Artis Real Estate Investment Trust has announced:
that it does not intend to exercise its right to redeem all or any part of the currently outstanding Preferred Units, Series A (“Series A Units”) (AX.PR.A) on September 30, 2017.
As a result, and subject to certain conditions set forth in the certificate of preferred units terms relating to the Series A Units dated effective August 2, 2012 (the “Certificate of Series A Unit Terms”), the holders of Series A Units will have the right to elect to reclassify all or any of their Series A Units into Preferred Units, Series B (“Series B Units”) of Artis on the basis of one Series B Unit for each Series A Unit held on September 30, 2017.
With respect to any Series A Units that remain outstanding after September 30, 2017, holders thereof will be entitled to receive distributions, if, as and when declared by the Board of Trustees of Artis, in an annual amount per Series A Unit determined by multiplying the Annual Fixed Distribution Rate for such subsequent fixed rate period by $25.00, and shall be payable quarterly on the last business day of each of March, June, September and December in each year during such subsequent fixed rate period. For the initial subsequent fixed rate period commencing on October 1, 2017, the Annual Fixed Distribution Rate is 5.662% per annum.
With respect to any Series B Units that may be issued on September 30, 2017, holders thereof will be entitled to receive distributions, if, as and when declared by the Board of Trustees of Artis, in an amount period per Series B Unit determined by multiplying the Floating Quarterly Distribution Rate (calculated on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed in such quarterly floating rate period, divided by 365) by $25.00, which shall be payable quarterly on the last business day of such quarterly floating rate period. For the initial quarterly floating rate period commencing October 1, 2017, the Floating Quarterly Distribution Rate is 4.802% per annum.
As provided in the Certificate of Series A Unit Terms: (i) if Artis determines that there would remain outstanding on September 30, 2017 less than 500,000 Series A Units, all remaining Series A Units shall be reclassified automatically into Series B Units on a oneforone basis, effective September 30, 2017; or (ii) if Artis determines that less than 500,000 Series B Units would be issued based upon the elections of holders, then holders of Series A Units shall not be entitled to reclassify their Series A Units into Series B Units.
As at the date hereof, there are an aggregate of 3,450,000 Series A Units issued and outstanding.
The Series A Units are issued in “book entry only” form and must be purchased or transferred through a participant in the CDS depository service (each, a “CDS Participant”). All rights of holders of Series A Units must be exercised through CDS or the CDS Participant through which the Series A Units are held. The deadline for the registered holder of Series A Units to provide notice of exercise of the right to reclassify Series A Units into Series B Units is 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on September 15, 2017. Any notices received after this deadline will not be valid. As such, holders of Series A Units who wish to exercise their right to reclassify their Series A Units into Series B Units should contact their broker or intermediary for more information and it is recommended that this be done well in advance of the deadline in order to provide the broker or other intermediary with time to complete the necessary steps.
If Artis does not receive an election notice from a holder of Series A Units during the time fixed therefor, then the Series A Units shall be deemed not to have been reclassified (other than pursuant to an automatic reclassification). Holders of Series A Units and Series B Units will have the opportunity to reclassify their units again on September 30, 2022, and every five years thereafter as long as such units remain outstanding.
The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) has conditionally approved the listing of the Series B Units effective upon reclassification. Listing of the Series B Units is subject to Artis fulfilling all the listing requirements of the TSX.
AX.PR.A is a FixedReset, 5.25%+406, that was announced 2012724 but only added to HIMIPref™ when the issue was rated by DBRS in 2013. It is tracked by HIMIPref™ but relegated to the Scraps subindex on credit concerns.
The most logical way to analyze the question of whether or not to convert is through the theory of Preferred Pairs, for which a calculator is available. Briefly, a Strong Pair is defined as a pair of securities that can be interconverted in the future (e.g., AX.PR.A and the FloatingReset that will exist if enough holders convert). Since they will be interconvertible on this future date, it may be assumed that they will be priced identically on this date (if they aren’t then holders will simply convert en masse to the higherpriced issue). And since they will be priced identically on a given date in the future, any current difference in price must be offset by expectations of an equal and opposite value of dividends to be received in the interim. And since the dividend rate on one element of the pair is both fixed and known, the implied average rate of the other, floating rate, instrument can be determined. Finally, we say, we may compare these average rates and take a view regarding the actual future course of that rate relative to the implied rate, which will provide us with guidance on which element of the pair is likely to outperform the other until the next interconversion date, at which time the process will be repeated.
We can show the breakeven rates for each FixedReset / FloatingReset Strong Pair graphically by plotting the implied average 3month bill rate against the next Exchange Date (which is the date to which the average will be calculated).
Click for Big
The market appears to have a distaste at the moment for floating rate product; most of the implied rates until the next interconversion are lower than the current 3month bill rate and the averages for investmentgrade and junk issues are both below current market rates, at +0.44% and +0.44%, respectively! Whatever might be the result of the next few Bank of Canada overnight rate decisions, I suggest that it is unlikely that the average rate over the next five years will be lower than current – but if you disagree, of course, you may interpret the data any way you like.
Since credit quality of each element of the pair is equal to the other element, it should not make any difference whether the pair examined is investmentgrade or junk, although we might expect greater variation of implied rates between junk issues on grounds of lower liquidity, and this is just what we see.
If we plug in the current bid price of the AX.PR.A FixedReset, we may construct the following table showing consistent prices for its soonmaybeissued FloatingReset counterpart given a variety of Implied Breakeven yields consistent with issues currently trading:
Estimate of FloatingReset (received in exchange for AX.PR.A) Trading Price In Current Conditions 

Assumed FloatingReset Price if Implied Bill is equal to 
FixedReset 
Bid Price 
Spread 
1.00% 
0.50% 
0.00% 
AX.PR.A 
22.66 
406bp 
22.08 
21.60 
21.12 
Based on current market conditions, I suggest that the FloatingResets that will result from conversion are likely to be cheap and trading below the price of their FixedReset counterparts. Therefore, it seems likely that I will recommend that holders of AX.PR.A continue to hold the issue and not to convert, but I will wait until it’s closer to the September 15 notification deadline before making a final pronouncement. I will note that, given the apparent cheapness of the FloatingResets, it may be a good trade to swap the FixedReset for the FloatingReset in the market once both elements of each pair are trading and you can – presumably, according to this analysis – do it with a reasonably good takeout in price, rather than doing it through the company on a 1:1 basis. But that, of course, will depend on the prices at that time and your forecast for the path of policy rates over the next five years. There are no guarantees – my recommendation is based on the assumption that current market conditions with respect to the pairs will continue until the FloatingResets commence trading and that the relative pricing of the two new pairs will reflect these conditions.
This entry was posted on Friday, September 1st, 2017 at 10:12 pm and is filed under Issue Comments, Return of Capital. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
AX.PR.A To Reset At 5.662%
Artis Real Estate Investment Trust has announced:
AX.PR.A is a FixedReset, 5.25%+406, that was announced 2012724 but only added to HIMIPref™ when the issue was rated by DBRS in 2013. It is tracked by HIMIPref™ but relegated to the Scraps subindex on credit concerns.
The most logical way to analyze the question of whether or not to convert is through the theory of Preferred Pairs, for which a calculator is available. Briefly, a Strong Pair is defined as a pair of securities that can be interconverted in the future (e.g., AX.PR.A and the FloatingReset that will exist if enough holders convert). Since they will be interconvertible on this future date, it may be assumed that they will be priced identically on this date (if they aren’t then holders will simply convert en masse to the higherpriced issue). And since they will be priced identically on a given date in the future, any current difference in price must be offset by expectations of an equal and opposite value of dividends to be received in the interim. And since the dividend rate on one element of the pair is both fixed and known, the implied average rate of the other, floating rate, instrument can be determined. Finally, we say, we may compare these average rates and take a view regarding the actual future course of that rate relative to the implied rate, which will provide us with guidance on which element of the pair is likely to outperform the other until the next interconversion date, at which time the process will be repeated.
We can show the breakeven rates for each FixedReset / FloatingReset Strong Pair graphically by plotting the implied average 3month bill rate against the next Exchange Date (which is the date to which the average will be calculated).
Click for Big
The market appears to have a distaste at the moment for floating rate product; most of the implied rates until the next interconversion are lower than the current 3month bill rate and the averages for investmentgrade and junk issues are both below current market rates, at +0.44% and +0.44%, respectively! Whatever might be the result of the next few Bank of Canada overnight rate decisions, I suggest that it is unlikely that the average rate over the next five years will be lower than current – but if you disagree, of course, you may interpret the data any way you like.
Since credit quality of each element of the pair is equal to the other element, it should not make any difference whether the pair examined is investmentgrade or junk, although we might expect greater variation of implied rates between junk issues on grounds of lower liquidity, and this is just what we see.
If we plug in the current bid price of the AX.PR.A FixedReset, we may construct the following table showing consistent prices for its soonmaybeissued FloatingReset counterpart given a variety of Implied Breakeven yields consistent with issues currently trading:
Price if Implied Bill
is equal to
Based on current market conditions, I suggest that the FloatingResets that will result from conversion are likely to be cheap and trading below the price of their FixedReset counterparts. Therefore, it seems likely that I will recommend that holders of AX.PR.A continue to hold the issue and not to convert, but I will wait until it’s closer to the September 15 notification deadline before making a final pronouncement. I will note that, given the apparent cheapness of the FloatingResets, it may be a good trade to swap the FixedReset for the FloatingReset in the market once both elements of each pair are trading and you can – presumably, according to this analysis – do it with a reasonably good takeout in price, rather than doing it through the company on a 1:1 basis. But that, of course, will depend on the prices at that time and your forecast for the path of policy rates over the next five years. There are no guarantees – my recommendation is based on the assumption that current market conditions with respect to the pairs will continue until the FloatingResets commence trading and that the relative pricing of the two new pairs will reflect these conditions.
This entry was posted on Friday, September 1st, 2017 at 10:12 pm and is filed under Issue Comments, Return of Capital. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.