PrefBlog

I have long been amused that monetary loosening intended to provoke investment in productivity enhancing endeavors has instead had the result of inflating housing bubbles; and now Citibank says there’s another problem:

Worldwide quantitative easing may be making investors richer rather than encouraging business investment, according to Citigroup Inc. (C)

Fulfilling the goals of central bankers such as Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, ultra-low interest rates and bond purchases are encouraging investors to buy stocks. Policy makers’ intent was that asset prices and wealth would rise, encouraging consumers and businesses to spend more.

The sticking point is the particular equities investors are favoring, Robert Buckland, Citigroup’s London-based chief global equity strategist, said in a Nov. 21 report. His research suggests they tend to choose companies that issue dividends and buy back shares rather than those that invest in the economy.

It was a modest day in the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums up 4bp while FixedResets and DeemedRetractibles both gained 2bp. Volatility was low but entirely comprised of losers. Volume was high.

And that’s it for another month!

Nothing happened today.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums gaining 7bp, FixedResets off 2bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 6bp. Volatility was minimal. Volume was above average.

Evan Soltas writes an interesting piece on Bloomberg titled Misconceptions 101: Why College Costs [in the US] Aren’t Soaring:

What has happened is a shift toward price discrimination — offering multiple prices for the same product. Universities have offset the increase in sticker price for most families through an expansion of grant-based financial aid and scholarships. That has caused the BLS measure to rise without increasing the net cost.

Wealthier families now pay more than ever to send their children to college. But for much of the middle class, the real net cost of college has not changed significantly; for much of the poor, the expansion of aid has increased the accessibility and affordability of a college education.

Data from the College Board show effectively no change in real net tuition and fees for dependent students at four-year public or private universities whose families are in the lower-two income quartiles. There also have been some increases in the real cost of room and board, but for families with below-average income, the rise has been on the order of 20 percent over 20 years.

At four-year public universities, the average sticker price for tuition and fees has risen 127 percent in real terms, from $3,810 in 1992 to $8,660 in this academic year. But only $990 of this $4,850 increase in sticker price, or 20 percent, is due to increases in net cost. The remaining 80 percent is price discrimination.

At four-year private universities, the story is the same. From 1992 to 2012, their average sticker price rose $12,020, or 70 percent, after inflation. Only 28 percent of this increase, or $3,370, has come from net cost; 72 percent of the increase is in the sticker price only.

In other words, the universities are now part of the tax system. Is this supposed to be good? I’m all in favour of merit-based scholarships and grants – but that’s not what is being defended. I also note that the increase in real net cost is about 25% over the past twenty years; it is not clear how this increase is justified.

Co-operators General Insurance Company was confirmed by DBRS at Pfd-3(high):

The Company is the cornerstone of The Co-operators Group Limited, a co-operative financial services organization with complementary interests in life insurance and investment management. As part of a larger financial services group, the Company enjoys a strong franchise in the co-operative space, which ranks it among the top five providers of general insurance products in Canada. The Company is positioned to benefit from recent management initiatives to reduce costs, contain underwriting risk and cultivate deeper customer relationships. The Company is demonstrating the discipline to pull back from unprofitable business even at the cost of lost revenue. More customer segmentation and differential pricing create a more favourable platform for improved future profitability.
…
In line with the improvement in underwriting profitability, return on equity has recovered to low double digits, which is in line with the Company’s targets. Investment income remains pressured by lower interest rates, although realized gains in market values of securities have supported investment results in recent periods. Financial leverage remains modest, with the preferred shares representing just 17.4% of capitalization. The corresponding fixed-charge coverage ratio has averaged between seven and eight times, which is strong for the rating category. The Company’s consolidated regulatory minimum (MCT) capital ratio is 269%, which is well in excess of the Company’s minimum target of 180% ($437 million of excess capital). Strong regulatory capital ratios at its major operating subsidiaries permit the regular flow of dividends up to the Company which, in addition to its own operating earnings, are available to meet its preferred share obligations. Liquidity is generally not a concern in the general insurance industry as premiums are written and invested in relatively liquid assets.

There’s an interesting article on Bloomberg about accountability of anti-piracy troops.

It was a day of very little movement for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums and DeemedRetractibles both gaining 1bp and FixedResets up 2bp. Volatility was low. Volume was a little above average.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 4.89%, equivalent to 6.36% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long Corporates now yield about 4.2%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 215bp, a small (and perhaps spurious) increase from the 210bp reported November 21.

There is some chatter about London’s decline as a financial centre:

Investment bankers and traders at European banks should expect at least a 15 percent cut in pay this year, while U.S. lenders may leave compensation unchanged, three consultants surveyed by Bloomberg said. That’s because bonus pools at European banks may be reduced by as much as half, while those at U.S. firms, which can cushion the impact of falling fees in the region with earnings from home, may fall 20 percent, they said.

“The real split is coming, and we will see the quantum divide this year,” said Tom Gosling, a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in London, referring to the difference in pay between the two financial centers. “U.S. regulators don’t have the same obsession with pay structures that European regulators have.”

While lower pay for all bankers reflects what may be a temporary drop in business, cuts at European lenders probably will be structural rather than cyclical, cementing a two-tier system, said John Purcell, chief executive officer of Purcell & Co., a London search firm. They also could spur some employees to relocate, according to recruitment company Astbury Marsden.

It’s not clear yet, but the latest Greek bail-out might work:

European finance ministers eased the terms on emergency aid for Greece, declaring after three years of false starts that Europe has found the formula for nursing the debt-stricken country back to health.

In the latest bid to keep the 17-nation euro intact, the ministers cut the rates on bailout loans, suspended interest payments for a decade, gave Greece more time to repay and engineered a Greek bond buyback. The country was also cleared to receive a 34.4 billion-euro ($44.7 billion) loan installment in December. Greek bonds rose.

“This has been a very difficult deal,” Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker told reporters in Brussels after chairing a 13-hour meeting that ended early today. “All initiatives decided upon today will bring Greece’s public debt clearly back on a sustainable path.”

After 240 billion euros in loan pledges and the biggest writedown of privately held debt failed to turn Greece around, the creditor governments led by Germany proclaimed the latest fix just as they grappled with swelling financing needs in Cyprus and a potential aid request by Spain, the fourth-largest euro economy.

To compensate for this little bit of progress, the Europeans have gone completely nuts on Credit Rating Agencies:

Credit ratings companies face curbs on when they can assess government debt and restrictions on their ownership under draft plans agreed on by European Union officials and legislators.

Lawmakers from the European Parliament and Cyprus, which holds the rotating presidency of the EU, also agreed today to allow investors to sue ratings companies if they lose money because of malpractice or gross negligence.
…
[ EU financial services chief Michel] Barnier proposed the tougher ratings rules after warnings from nations including France and Germany that downgrades of sovereign debt had deepened the bloc’s fiscal crisis. Barnier said last year that ratings companies were guilty of “serious mistakes” and shouldn’t be allowed to “increase market volatility” through ill-timed or unjustified downgrades.
…
On sovereign debt ratings, lawmakers and officials agreed that each credit rating firm must pick three days a year when they would be allowed to give so-called unsolicited assessments of governments’ creditworthiness, according to Jean-Paul Gauzes, a lawmaker involved in the talks. Ratings firms may get a chance to issue unsolicited ratings outside those dates if they could justify it to regulators.
…
The EU also plans to block any investor from owning stakes of more than 5 percent in more than one rating company, Gauzes said in an interview after the meeting.
…
The commission said that it will weigh further steps to regulate the credit ratings market, including the creation of a “European credit rating agency.” Officials will report on the possible step by 2016, it said.

All this sounds like a really good reason for CRAs to set up shop well outside the EU.

I wonder if they will declare the OECD to be illegal?

The OECD slashed its global growth forecasts on Tuesday, warning that the debt crisis in the recession-hit euro zone is the greatest threat to the world economy.

In light of the dire economic outlook, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development urged central banks to prepare for more exceptional monetary easing if politicians fail to come up with credible answers to the debt crisis.
…
Cutting its estimates, the OECD forecast that the euro zone economy would contract 0.4 per cent this year and another 0.1 per cent next year, only returning to growth in 2014 with a rate of 1.3 per cent.

Maybe that’s related to the bad press for long sovereigns:

Given the overheated market, it’s understandable why Michael Sabia, chief executive of the Caisse, told the Financial Times on Tuesday that he is planning to lower his institution’s $58.8-billion allocation to fixed-income investments by at least $7-billion next year. And why [Boston-based fund manager] GMO, a highly regarded money manager, told the FT it has “given up” on long-dated sovereign debt.

But if big institutions are starting to pull out of fixed income investments, ordinary Canadians are continuing to pile in. As of the end of October, retail investors had poured a net $16.3-billion into bond funds so far in 2012 – almost three times as much as in the same period in 2011 – while redeeming a net $11.5-billion from equity funds, according to the Investment Funds Institute of Canada.

The Caisse hasn’t always been the best proxy for smart money, but GMO has. Headed by the famed investor Jeremy Grantham, it shifted its portfolios to a high cash position in late 2007, just before the credit crisis mushroomed, and also managed to avoid being sucked in by the Internet bubble in the late 1990s.

Now, GMO is holding 40 per cent of its assets in cash, according to the FT. Canadians thinking it’s high time they added more bonds to their portfolios should think twice; there may be safer places to keep that money.

Why is it so expensive to go to school in the US?:

At universities nationwide, employment of administrators jumped 60 percent from 1993 to 2009, 10 times the growth rate for tenured faculty. “Administrative bloat is clearly contributing to the overall cost of higher education,” says Jay Greene, an education professor at the University of Arkansas. In a 2010 study, Greene found that from 1993 to 2007, spending on administration rose almost twice as fast as funding for research and teaching at 198 leading U.S. universities.

It was a negative day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums down 5bp, FixedResets losing 18bp and DeemedRetractibles off 3bp. Volatility was average, but all negative. Volume was well above average.

Lapdog Carney got a better job:

Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney was unexpectedly named head of the Bank of England as the U.K. government looked abroad for a candidate untainted by financial turmoil to lead the beefed-up central bank.

Carney, a 47-year old former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. managing director, will become the first foreigner to run the 318-year-old institution as it absorbs new powers to oversee banks. He’ll replace Mervyn King from July as policy makers pursue record-low interest rates and asset-buying to propel the economy from its first double-dip recession since the 1970s.
…
“Carney is a surprise choice but he is a highly respected central banker,” said Philip Shaw, an economist at Investec Securities in London. “The Canadian banking system is widely regarded to be in good shape because of the Bank of Canada’s approach to regulation ahead of the credit crisis, and this may have been a factor in his appointment.”

In announcing his selection and seeking to get ahead of any criticism about his decision to look overseas for talent, Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne described Carney as “quite simply the best, most experienced and most qualified person in the world to do the job.”

Mr. Shaw will doubtless be surprised to learn that the BoC does not, in fact, regulate banks in Canada – that’s what OSFI pretends to do – as Dickson was very quick to point out:

“Mr. Carney brings tremendous credibility in this new role and I will miss his counsel as a member of the team of government agencies in Canada that work together in support of a sound and stable financial system.”

Now we are all on tenterhooks: will Carney be able to read Osborne’s handwriting properly when drafting speeches? Osborne & Cameron remind me of another political pair:

David Cameron has ruled out George Osborne giving up his political strategy role to focus on being Chancellor.

Despite fierce criticism of Mr Osborne for grim economic figures, the Prime Minister told colleagues that Downing Street and the Treasury working hand in hand was a ‘strength, not a weakness’.

But Lord Ryder, a former Tory chief whip, has claimed both men are ‘obsessed with management of 24-hour news’ and called for there to be a ‘full-time’ Chancellor.

Revenge of the nerds?:

Having left the heavy-lifting to technology companies until early this year, San Francisco’s non-tech employers are playing a growing role in the city’s labor recovery. Positions in everything from retail to construction to hospitality now comprise about 75 percent of the city’s job growth, helping the Northern Californian hub add jobs at among the fastest rates in the nation and reduce its unemployment rate to 6.5 percent.

San Francisco’s experience is also seen in broadening expansions in other U.S. technology centers such as Seattle and Boston, easing concerns that innovation would create work for only the most highly-skilled and highly-paid while others get left behind. Every new technology job in a city creates five additional local jobs outside the sector over time, according to an analysis by Enrico Moretti, an economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

“People were missing the big picture,” said Moretti, author of “The New Geography of Jobs” published in May. “Tech cannot offer jobs to the average worker, but every software engineer attracted to Twitter will indirectly support many more service jobs. My research suggests that this multiplier effect is particularly large for high-tech jobs.”

The OSC has released OSC Staff Notice 33-738: 2012 OSC Annual Summary Report for Dealers, Advisers and Investment Fund Managers. The associated NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENT ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103
REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS AND TO COMPANION POLICY 31-103CP REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS June 14, 2012 (2nd Publication) Cost Disclosure, Performance Reporting and Client Statements states:

(v) Percentage return calculation method

We are proposing to mandate that registrants use the dollar-weighted method in calculating the percentage return on a client’s account or portfolio, in order to promote consistency and comparability in investor reporting from one registrant to another.

We had previously considered permitting registrants to choose between a time-weighted and dollar-weighted performance calculation method. We have decided to mandate the dollar-weighted method because it most accurately reflects the actual return of the client’s investments. This is in keeping with one of the main themes of the project — allowing investors to measure how their investments have performed.

Time-weighted methods are generally used to evaluate the registrant’s performance in managing an account, as the returns are calculated without taking into consideration any external cash flows. These methods isolate the portion of an account’s return that is attributable solely to the registrant’s actions. The philosophy behind time-weighted methods is that a registrant’s performance should be measured independently of external cash flows, because contributions and withdrawals by an investor are out of the registrant’s control.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Issue for comment

We invite comments on the benefits and constraints of the proposal to mandate the use of the dollar-weighted method, in particular as they relate to providing meaningful information to investors.

We are not prohibiting the use of the time-weighted method, but if a registered firm uses such a method, it must be in addition to the dollar-weighted calculation.

Given the very well known tendency of investors to make bad timing decisions , this will probably result in a decline of most honestly reported performance figures. There is no indication as yet as to whether mutual funds will be bound by the same rules.

Some Ontario lawyers are saying there are too many lawyers:

In another vote Thursday, the council responded to a critical shortage of articling positions by creating an alternative path to the profession. It calls for four months of extra classroom education as well as an unpaid, co-op work placement.

During debate, some council members expressed misgivings about the competency of many students flocking to a legal career.

“The law schools are now sending us flood upon flood of students,” said lawyer Bradley Wright. “Because no one fails any more, being accepted into first-year law school guarantees you a call to the bar. … Just show up at the door and you will be accepted into our profession.”

I’ll believe it when prices come down.

The Canadian preferred share market suffered a small decline today, with PerpetualPremiums and FixedResets down 7bp and DeemedRetractibles off 2bp. Volatility was non-existent. Volume was average and dominated by ENB issues in the wake of the new issue announcement.

Richard W. Fisher gave a rather provocative speech last week titled The State of the West (With Reference to George Shultz, Eisenhower, Buzz Lightyear, George Strait, the San Francisco Fed and Adam and Eve) :

I’ll just say this: Our Congress—past and present—has behaved disgracefully in discharging its fiscal duty. Its members have not shown themselves to be true born leaders.
…
The jig is up. Our fiscal authorities have mortgaged the material assets of our grandchildren to the nth degree. We are at risk of losing our political heritage of reaching across the aisle to work for the common good. In the minds of many, our government’s fiscal misfeasance threatens the world’s respect for America as the beacon of democracy.

Only the Congress of the United States can now save us from fiscal perdition. The Federal Reserve cannot. The Federal Reserve has been carrying the ball for the fiscal authorities by holding down interest rates in an attempt to stoke the recovery while the fiscal authorities wrestle themselves off the mat. But there are limits to what a monetary authority can do. For the central bank also plays a fiduciary role for the American people and, given our franchise as the globe’s premier reserve currency, the world. We dare not become the central bank counterpart to Congress by adopting a Buzz Lightyear approach of “To infinity and beyond!” by endlessly purchasing U.S. Treasuries and agency debt so as to encumber future generations of central bankers with Hobson’s choices when it comes to undoing what seems contemporarily appropriate.

So my only comment today regarding the recent federal elections is this: Pray that the president and the Congress will at last tackle the fiscal imbroglio they and their predecessors created and only they can undo.

This speech has been energetically attacked by Tim Duy, but only on the basis of timing:

What is it about fiscal policy that brings out the crazy?  Because it all seems pretty simple.  Joe Weisenthal hits the nail on the head:

The U.S. recovery has been remarkable on a comparative basis precisely for one reason: Because despite all of the rhetoric, the U.S. has completely avoided the austerity madness that's gripped much of the world.

Weisenthal points us to Ryan Avent and Josh Lehner, both showing in different ways the better post-recession outcomes experienced by the US compared to other economies.  Paul Krugman extends the argument by comparing the divergent path of Eurozone and US unemployment rates.  The key difference in policy – the US pursued a more aggressive fiscal policy and didn't pull back too quickly.  I don't think you can emphasize this point enough.   

Which brings us to the fiscal cliff (or slope, which is more accurate and avoids creating the false impression that all is lost come January 1).  The tax increases and spending cuts in place promise to repeat the mistakes of the UK and the Eurozone by pivoting too fast and too hard into the realm of fiscal austerity.  A solution to the fiscal cliff means smoothing the path to fiscal consolidation (optimally, with no austerity in the near term, but I don't see that as an outcome).

What I want to see from the politicians is sufficient changes to put the US into a structural surplus. Note the word “structural” – it does not mean diving off the fiscal cliff, although according to the Congressional Budget Office, even giving full effect to the fiscal cliff does not lead to a structural surplus; there is a projected deficit every year through 2022, the end of their horizon. Thus, while I would not like to see a sudden dive of the fiscal cliff, I feel that a path must be taken that goes beyond those projected measures (or equivalent) over the medium term.

Click for Big

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums up 12bp, FixedResets gaining 5bp and DeemedRetractibles off 1bp. Volatility continued to be low. FixedResets dominated a day of relatively low volume, perhaps influenced by a move towards the new FixedReset ETF, ZPR, which now claims to have $5.2-million under management and traded slightly under 40,000 shares today (at about $15 each, or a total of $0.6-million).