The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has announced:
that it has completed the offering of 12 million Basel III-compliant non-cumulative Rate Reset Class A Preferred Shares Series 41 (the “Series 41 Shares”) priced at $25.00 per share to raise gross proceeds of $300 million.
The offering was made through a syndicate of underwriters led by CIBC World Markets Inc. The Series 41 Shares commence trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange today under the ticker symbol CM.PR.P.
The Series 41 Shares were issued under a prospectus supplement dated December 8, 2014, to CIBC’s short form base shelf prospectus dated March 11, 2014.
CM.PR.P is a FixedReset, 3.75%+224, announced December 8. This issue will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and has been added to the FixedResets index.
The issue traded 862,850 shares today (consolidated exchanges) in a range of 24.75-94 before closing at 24.75-76.
Vital statistics are:
CM.PR.P | FixedReset | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2044-12-16 Maturity Price : 23.07 Evaluated at bid price : 24.75 Bid-YTW : 3.53 % |
Hi James,
I can currently purchase (via Scotia iTrade discount brokers) CIBC Capital Trust bonds (10.25% coupon, earliest call 30-Jun-2039, maturity 30-Jun-2108!) for $135.34 per $100 par value, for a yield of 6.5%. (I’m not sure if it is calculated to maturity or to the first call, but that shouldn’t make a big difference.) Similarly priced Capital Trust bonds for other banks are also available.
Presumably, these Capital Trust bonds would be of equivalent or, more likely, of better credit quality than NVCC-compliant prefs such as CM.PR.P. Nothwithstanding that the payout is taxable interest and that there is no reset provision with these bonds, it nevertheless seems that the difference in yield is very significant.
Would you please enlighten me as to why this difference is so pronounced? Stated more provocatively, why doesn’t everyone just buy the Capital Trust bonds and forget about the NVCC-compliant prefs?
From the prospectus:
A “Series B Interest Reset Date” means June 30, 2039, and every five years thereafter, so you’re OK on that one.
But a “Regulatory Event”?
And guess what? These issues are not NVCC compliant so CIBC expects to exercise the clause in 2022, as I discussed in my 2011 post Regulatory Event Clause To See Minimal Use. I complained about the effects of this on the so-called bond indices ha ha in my article Shaken and stirred: How the OSFI wants to manipulate bond investors
So I don’t know the yield of 6.5% was calculated, but a capital loss of $35 over the next seven years is $5 p.a., deducted from interest of $10.25, and paid on initial investment of $135 … the yield ain’t 6.5%, I’ll tell you that much. Did you take advice from a bank?
Thanks James for the clear response. It’s very disappointing that iTrade only indicates the possible 2039 early call and not the probable non-NVCC regulatory call. For most “retail” investors (like myself) it is very difficult to understand these subtleties from the prospectuses.