{"id":10341,"date":"2010-04-04T14:40:50","date_gmt":"2010-04-04T18:40:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=10341"},"modified":"2010-04-04T14:40:50","modified_gmt":"2010-04-04T18:40:50","slug":"index-performance-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=10341","title":{"rendered":"Index Performance: March 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Performance of the HIMIPref\u2122 Indices for March, 2010, was:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">Total Return<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Performance<br \/>\nMarch 2010<\/td>\n<td>Three Months<br \/>\nto<br \/>\nMarch 31, 2010<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ratchet<\/td>\n<td>+8.85%<b>*<\/b><\/td>\n<td>+32.94%<b>*<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FixFloat<\/td>\n<td>+7.56%<\/td>\n<td>+17.20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Floater<\/td>\n<td>+3.04%<\/td>\n<td>+19.91%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OpRet<\/td>\n<td>+0.09%<\/td>\n<td>-0.99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SplitShare<\/td>\n<td>+0.13%<\/td>\n<td>+1.88%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Interest<\/td>\n<td>+0.09%<b>****<\/b><\/td>\n<td>-0.99%<b>****<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PerpetualPremium<\/td>\n<td>-1.96%<\/td>\n<td>-1.70%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>-3.33%<\/td>\n<td>-3.51%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>+0.57%<\/td>\n<td>+0.89%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\"><b>*<\/b> <i>The last member of the RatchetRate index was transferred to Scraps at the February, 2009, rebalancing; subsequent performance figures are set equal to the Floater index<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Independent measurement was resumed when an issue qualified for inclusion (transferred from Scraps) at the <s>February<\/s> January, 2010, rebalancing.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\"><b>****<\/b> <i>The last member of the InterestBearing index was transferred to Scraps at the June, 2009, rebalancing; subsequent performance figures are set equal to the OperatingRetractible index<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">Passive Funds (see below for calculations)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CPD<\/td>\n<td>-0.96%<\/td>\n<td>-1.31%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DPS.UN<\/td>\n<td>+1.74%<\/td>\n<td>+1.22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">Index<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BMO-CM 50<\/td>\n<td>-0.66%<\/td>\n<td>+0.33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>TXPR Total Return<\/td>\n<td>-0.86%<\/td>\n<td>-0.95%<\/td>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>The pre-tax interest equivalent spread of PerpetualDiscounts over Long Corporates (which I also refer to as the Seniority Spread) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=10303\">ended the month<\/a> at +285bp, a sharp increase from the +235bp recorded at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=9878\">February month-end<\/a>. The decline in the PerpetualDiscount index was entirely due to an increase in the spread over corporates, since yields on long corporates actually declined from 5.9% to 5.8%.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/components_long_big.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/components_long_small.jpg\"><\/a><br \/><i>Click for big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>The Seniority Spread is now the largest component of PerpetualDiscount Interest-Equivalent yields:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/components_short_big.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/components_short_small.jpg\"><\/a><br \/><i>Click for big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>The seniority spread is at a one-year high:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/SenSpread_short_big.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/SenSpread_short_small.jpg\"><\/a><br \/><i>Click for big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>And the Seniority Spread is well above long-term levels:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/SenSpread_long_big.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/SenSpread_long_small.jpg\"><\/a><br \/><i>Click for big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>The relative returns on Floaters over the past year continues to impress:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/relRet_big.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/relRet_small.jpg\"><\/a><br \/><i>Click for big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>But one must remember how they got there:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/FloatersLT_big.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/FloatersLT_small.jpg\"><\/a><br \/><i>Click for big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>FixedReset volume picked up during the month. Volume may be under-reported due to the influence of Alternative Trading Systems (as discussed in the November <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefletter.com\">PrefLetter<\/a>), but I am biding my time before incorporating ATS volumes into the calculations, to see if the effect is transient or not.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/volume_big.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/volume_small.jpg\"><\/a><br \/><i>Click for big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>As discussed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=9930\">in February<\/a>, the impressive returns of the past year cannot continue indefinately. The long term return on a fixed income instrument is its yield &#8211; 6.2% for a PerpetualDiscount, and about 3.6% to the call date for a FixedReset, as of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=10325\">April 1<\/a>. The FixedReset index set <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=10183\">a new low yield in March<\/a>, highlighted by RY.PR.R&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=10272\">brief flirtation with sub-3% levels<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Compositions of the passive funds were discussed in the September edition of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefletter.com\">PrefLetter<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Claymore has published <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claymoreinvestments.ca\/etf\/fund\/cpd\/history\">NAV and distribution data<\/a> (problems with the page in IE8 can be kludged by using compatibility view) for its exchange traded fund (CPD) and I have derived the following table:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"5\">CPD Return, 1- &#038; 3-month, to March 31, 2010<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Date<\/td>\n<td>NAV<\/td>\n<td>Distribution<\/td>\n<td>Return for Sub-Period<\/td>\n<td>Monthly Return<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>December 31, 2009<\/td>\n<td>16.89<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>January 29<\/td>\n<td>16.80<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>-0.53%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>February 26, 2010<\/td>\n<td>16.83<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>+0.18%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>March 26<\/td>\n<td>16.64<\/td>\n<td>0.21<\/td>\n<td>+0.12%<\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"2\">-0.96%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>March 31, 2009<\/td>\n<td>16.46<\/td>\n<td>0.00<\/td>\n<td>-1.08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><strong>Quarterly Return<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>-1.31%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Claymore <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claymoreinvestments.ca\/etf\/fund\/cpd\">currently holds $435,437,774<\/a> (advisor &#038; common combined) in CPD assets, up about $15-million from the $420,750,223 reported last month and up about $62-million from the $373,729,364 reported at year-end.<\/p>\n<p>The DPS.UN NAV for March 31 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sentryselect.com\/English\/Products\/DiversifiedPreferredShareTrust\/default.aspx\">has been published<\/a> so we may calculate the approximate March returns. On March 29, it went ex-Dividend for $0.30 <a href=\"http:\/\/cxa.marketwatch.com\/tsx\/en\/market\/quote.aspx?symbol=dps.un&#038;x=14&#038;y=12\">according to the TMX<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"5\">DPS.UN NAV Return, March-ish 2010<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Date<\/td>\n<td>NAV<\/td>\n<td>Distribution<\/td>\n<td>Return for sub-period<\/td>\n<td>Return for period<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>February 24, 2010<\/td>\n<td>19.91<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>March 29, 2010<\/td>\n<td>20.09 <b>**<\/b><\/td>\n<td>0.30<\/td>\n<td>+2.41%<\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"2\">+1.59%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>March 31, 2010<\/td>\n<td>19.93<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td>-0.80%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">Estimated February Ending Stub<\/td>\n<td>-0.12% <b>*<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><strong>Estimated March Return<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>+1.47% ***<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"5\"><em><b>*<\/b>CPD had a NAVPU of 16.81 on February 24 and 16.83 on February 26, hence the total return for the period for CPD was +0.12%. The return for DPS.UN in this period is presumed to be equal.<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"5\"><b>**<\/b> The March 31 NAVPU was $19.93. CPD had a NAV of 16.46 on March 31 and 16.59 on March 29. Thus, a NAVPU of 20.09 for DPS on March 29 has been estimated<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"5\"><em><b>***<\/b> The estimated February return for DPS.UN&#8217;s NAV is therefore the product of three period returns, +2.41%, -0.80% and -0.12% to arrive at an estimate for the calendar month of +1.47%<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Now, to see the DPS.UN quarterly NAV approximate return, we refer to the calculations for  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=9592\">January<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=9930\">February<\/a>:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\">DPS.UN NAV Returns, three-month-ish to end-March-ish, 2010<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>January-ish<\/td>\n<td>+1.39%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>February-ish<\/td>\n<td>-1.61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>March-ish<\/td>\n<td>+1.47%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Three-months-ish<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>+1.22%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Performance of the HIMIPref\u2122 Indices for March, 2010, was: Total Return Index Performance March 2010 Three Months to March 31, 2010 Ratchet +8.85%* +32.94%* FixFloat +7.56% +17.20% Floater +3.04% +19.91% OpRet +0.09% -0.99% SplitShare +0.13% &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-index-construction-and-reporting"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10341"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10341\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}