{"id":1173,"date":"2007-09-07T22:39:30","date_gmt":"2007-09-08T02:39:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1173"},"modified":"2007-09-07T22:39:30","modified_gmt":"2007-09-08T02:39:30","slug":"september-7-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=1173","title":{"rendered":"September 7, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Well &#8211; a short week, but not entirely devoid of interest!<\/p>\n<p>Today&#8217;s big news was that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=avfz4xDx9KzE&#038;refer=home\">the US Jobs number was negative<\/a>, which hasn&#8217;t happened in a while. <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/economics\/2007\/09\/07\/politicians-react-troubling-vs-comfortable\/\">Politicians<\/a> reacted according to their stripe; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/economics\/2007\/09\/07\/economists-react-worse-to-come\/\">economists<\/a> hastily revised downwards their expectations for both growth and rates. Greenspan sounds <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/economics\/2007\/09\/07\/greenspan-on-euphoria-bubbles-and-fear\/\">very happy it&#8217;s not his problem<\/a>. There is general agreement <a href=\"http:\/\/www.econbrowser.com\/archives\/2007\/09\/dueling_recessi_1.html\">chances of a recession have increased<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve previously mentioned Deutsche Bank&#8217;s success at Credit Anticipation in betting against sub-prime. Another\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aoNBakuRHeH8&#038;refer=home\">winner emerged today<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The $4.5 billion Credit Opportunities fund, started last year, gained 26.7 percent in August, according to a Paulson investor. Credit Opportunities II, a newer $2.3 billion fund, is up more than threefold after a 32 percent return last month.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I feel quite sure that a lot of these massive losses we&#8217;re reading about are just hedge funds transferring money back and forth &#8230; when you share 20% of winnings and 0% of losses, why not bet the firm?<\/p>\n<p>The Canadian <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601009&#038;sid=ajeqUKjeUJQY&#038;refer=bond\">bank-operated ABCP market<\/a> is having major problems. Three-month BAs are yielding about 5% &#8230; ABCP is yielding about about 5.60% &#8230; when <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bankofcanada.ca\/en\/rates\/monmrt.html\">three-month bills are at 4.04%<\/a>. That kind of spread is &#8230; well, let&#8217;s just say that banks are not having a nice time. Mind you, it&#8217;s even worse in the States, with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ustreas.gov\/offices\/domestic-finance\/debt-management\/interest-rate\/yield.shtml\">bills at 4.07%<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.federalreserve.gov\/releases\/cp\/default.htm\">financial paper at 5.48%<\/a> (US ABCP at 6.18%). While we&#8217;re on the topic of ABCP, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.federalreserve.gov\/releases\/cp\/outstandings.htm\">outstandings in America<\/a> continue to shrivel, which indicates a ferocious combination of deleveraging and transfer to bank lines. The &#8216;transfer to bank lines&#8217; part is dangerous &#8211; there is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.voxeu.com\/index.php?q=node\/534\">some concern<\/a> regarding the banks&#8217; committments and whether regulators need to step in. I don&#8217;t know, frankly, if line committments are added in any way to risk-adjusted capital. They should be! Especially since laying off risk is, to an extent, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/finance\/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9769296\">boomeranging<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Countrywide Credit is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aQhytb8fv1Tk&#038;refer=home\">having a mass layoff<\/a>, trying to survive in environment where it&#8217;s difficult, to say the least, to securitize mortgages that it originates. Citigroup is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601009&#038;sid=aLU8dXZYK.Po&#038;refer=bond\">reportedly refusing to accept<\/a> new mortgage clients. But maybe they&#8217;re just providing bigger lines to fewer clients.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Centex Corp., a Dallas-based homebuilder and lender, said in a regulatory filing today it replaced a warehouse credit line with a larger one arranged by JPMorgan Chase &#038; Co. that may provide as much as $1 billion. Centex increased the credit line because the global credit crunch made it hard to rely on selling short-term notes to finance mortgages, the filing said.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601010&#038;sid=aIsb5gsbG7CI&#038;refer=news\">US equities<\/a> went splat on the jobs number. Recessions aren&#8217;t generally good for profits! <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601084&#038;sid=aZ2WD8FEqnU0&#038;refer=stocks\">Canadian equities\u00a0also fell<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601009&#038;sid=ag0arEFiTkCQ&#038;refer=bond\">Treasuries<\/a> had such a good day on the back of the jobs number it has to be referred to as panic-buying (possibly <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rgemonitor.com\/blog\/setser\/213948\">sending a lot of profit to foreign\u00a0central banks<\/a>, since boneheaded fiscal policies have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.clevelandfed.org\/research\/trends\/2007\/0907\/01intmar_090507.cfm\">sent a lot of money abroad<\/a>).\u00a0Why not, when\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbot.com\/cbot\/pub\/page\/0,3181,1563,00.html\">Fed Fund Futures<\/a> are predicting a\u00a0rate of 4.5%\u00a0by December? Well, perhaps because\u00a0Fed officials are <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/economics\/2007\/09\/06\/fed-talk-policymakers-are-watching-housing\/\">watching the\u00a0economy, not markets<\/a>.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/ca.news.finance.yahoo.com\/s\/07092007\/6\/finance-canada-dollar-sags-despite-domestic-data-bonds.html\">Canadas<\/a> had a super day, with the ten-years&#8217; yield declining about 13bp.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"8\"><strong>Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Mean Current Yield (at bid)<\/td>\n<td>Mean YTW<\/td>\n<td>Mean Average Trading Value<\/td>\n<td>Mean Mod Dur (YTW)<\/td>\n<td>Issues<\/td>\n<td>Day&#8217;s Perf.<\/td>\n<td>Index Value<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ratchet<\/td>\n<td>4.94%<\/td>\n<td>4.89%<\/td>\n<td>1,800,839<\/td>\n<td>15.54<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>+0.0000%<\/td>\n<td>1,043.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Fixed-Floater<\/td>\n<td>4.85%<\/td>\n<td>4.76%<\/td>\n<td>110,120<\/td>\n<td>15.85<\/td>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<td>+0.4523%<\/td>\n<td>1,032.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Floater<\/td>\n<td>4.43%<\/td>\n<td>3.06%<\/td>\n<td>89,111<\/td>\n<td>10.77<\/td>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td>+0.4089%<\/td>\n<td>1,048.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Op. Retract<\/td>\n<td>4.83%<\/td>\n<td>3.91%<\/td>\n<td>76,509<\/td>\n<td>3.03<\/td>\n<td>15<\/td>\n<td>-0.0474%<\/td>\n<td>1,028.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Split-Share<\/td>\n<td>5.11%<\/td>\n<td>4.62%<\/td>\n<td>100,629<\/td>\n<td>3.70<\/td>\n<td>15<\/td>\n<td>+0.2704%<\/td>\n<td>1,050.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Interest Bearing<\/td>\n<td>6.31%<\/td>\n<td>6.90%<\/td>\n<td>65,636<\/td>\n<td>4.55<\/td>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td>-0.3771%<\/td>\n<td>1,029.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Perpetual-Premium<\/td>\n<td>5.47%<\/td>\n<td>5.00%<\/td>\n<td>91,498<\/td>\n<td>5.00<\/td>\n<td>24<\/td>\n<td>+0.0058%<\/td>\n<td>1,032.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Perpetual-Discount<\/td>\n<td>5.06%<\/td>\n<td>5.10%<\/td>\n<td>262,025<\/td>\n<td>15.06<\/td>\n<td>38<\/td>\n<td>+0.0996%<\/td>\n<td>982.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><strong>Major Price Changes<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Issue<\/td>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Change<\/td>\n<td>Notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>MFC.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>OpRet<\/td>\n<td>-1.0828%<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.77% based on a bid of 25.58 and a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefshares.com\/glossary.html#softMaturity\">softMaturity<\/a> 2015-12-18 at 25.00. That&#8217;s about 5.25% yield equivalent &#8211; bonds are a better bet than this.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>LFE.PR.E<\/td>\n<td>SplitShare<\/td>\n<td>+1.0348%<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.71% based on a bid of 10.74 and a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefshares.com\/glossary.html#hardMaturity\">hardMaturity<\/a> 2012-12-1 at 10.00. Again &#8211; bonds look like a better idea at levels like this!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BCE.PR.T<\/td>\n<td>FixFloat<\/td>\n<td>+1.1066%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>RY.PR.E<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>+1.2849%<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.95% based on a bid of 22.86 and a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefshares.com\/glossary.html#limitMaturity\">limitMaturity<\/a>.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><strong>Volume Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Issue<\/td>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Volume<\/td>\n<td>Notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GWO.PR.I<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>353,675<\/td>\n<td>Nesbitt crossed 24,300 at 22.70. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.96% based on a bid of 22.68 and a limitMaturity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PWF.PR.F<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualPremium<\/td>\n<td>38,626<\/td>\n<td>National Bank crossed 35,000 at 24.95. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.29% based on a bid of 25.05 and a limitMaturity.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SLF.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>32,950<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.99% based on a bid of 23.80 and a limitMaturity.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>MFC.PR.C<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>27,825<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.86% based on a bid of 23.20 and a limitMaturity.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>POW.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualPremium<\/td>\n<td>27,550<\/td>\n<td>Scotia crossed 25,000 at 25.11. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.67% based on a bid of 25.10 and a limitMaturity.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>There were ten other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.\n<\/p>\n<p><!--6b5455b6c86b04222a373a46017db72c--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well &#8211; a short week, but not entirely devoid of interest! Today&#8217;s big news was that the US Jobs number was negative, which hasn&#8217;t happened in a while. Politicians reacted according to their stripe; economists &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-action"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1173"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1173\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}