{"id":12559,"date":"2010-10-14T21:46:13","date_gmt":"2010-10-15T01:46:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=12559"},"modified":"2010-10-14T21:46:13","modified_gmt":"2010-10-15T01:46:13","slug":"october-14-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=12559","title":{"rendered":"October 14, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"

It looks like the Flash Crash will be simply an excuse<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Data firm Nanex LLC has since questioned regulators’ finding, suggesting Waddell’s algorithm actually did factor in price because data show a slowdown in selling by Waddell during the market’s steepest decline.<\/p>\n

CFTC Economist Andrei Kirilenko on Tuesday left open the possibility that the algorithm didn’t completely ignore prices.<\/p>\n

The staff is “not aware of any specific price limit that was built into the algorithm,” he told CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler. But just because there wasn’t a price limit didn’t mean the algorithm didn’t “take into account prices and quantities,” he added.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

OK – so the Flash Crash report is now highly suspect. Intellectual dishonesty is running rampant. But why would they be dishonest?<\/p>\n

Commodity Futures Trading Commission enforcement attorney Bob Pease said the agency is eyeing the use of trading algorithms and a practice known as “quote stuffing” as possible areas that could be deemed disruptive under a provision in the Dodd-Frank financial law enacted in July.
…<\/b>
Mr. Pease, the CFTC lawyer, said the agency is looking to see if automated algorithms are “inherently disruptive” and if market players should have certain responsibilities in how they execute these orders. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Well, because you’ve got two-bit Napoleons like Bob Pease anxious to lump use of trading algorithms in the same category as quote-stuffing to push a regulatory agenda in which everything is regulated.<\/p>\n

Speaking of algorithms, the two Norwegians discussed October 5<\/a> have been convicted on charges of smart trading<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Two Norwegian day traders have been handed suspended prison sentences for market manipulation after outwitting the automated trading system of a big US broker.<\/p>\n

The two men worked out how the computerised system would react to certain trading patterns \u2013 allowing them to influence the price of low-volume stocks.
…<\/b>
Prosecutors said Mr Larsen and Mr Veiby \u201cgave false and misleading signals about supply, demand and prices\u201d by manipulating several Norwegian stocks through Timber Hill\u2019s online trading platform.<\/p>\n

Anders Brosveet, lawyer for Mr Veiby, acknowledged that his client had learnt how \u00adTimber Hill\u2019s trading algorithm would behave in response to \u00adcertain trades but denied this amounted to market manipulation. \u201cThey had an idea of how the computer would change the prices but that does not make them responsible for what the computer did,\u201d he told the Financial Times. Both men have vowed to appeal against their convictions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Precisely. While I suspect that this is one of those cases where the keys to the puzzle are too complex to make it into the newspaper, I cannot fathom how exploiting an idiotic algorithm – using only arm’s length trades between willing counterparties – can possibly be seen as a crime.<\/p>\n

CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler has been criticized on PrefBlog – but there can be no doubt he is a fine regulator<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Gensler has asked Congress to increase the agency\u2019s budget by 69 percent next year to $286 million and predicts the agency\u2019s budgeted staff of about 650 will need to grow to more than 1,000 to meet its new demands.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There are rumours that the capital surcharge talks are in trouble<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Leaders of the world\u2019s largest economies, divided over how to curb risk-taking by their biggest banks, will likely fail to agree on a capital surcharge.<\/p>\n

Instead, the Financial Stability Board, which is weighing measures to prevent such institutions from causing another economic crisis, will recommend a range of options without setting a level of extra capital to be imposed globally, said members of the group who declined to be identified because the discussions are private. The FSB will meet in Seoul next week.<\/p>\n

The fissures running through the group are similar to those that split the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision when it considered tighter capital requirements for all banks this year. Germany, France and Japan are resisting a surcharge for big lenders, as are lobbyists for those firms, while the U.K., U.S. and Switzerland advocate the approach, members say. That camp agreed to soften some of the Basel capital rules with the understanding that more would be done to restrain the largest banks through the FSB.
…<\/b>
France, Japan and Germany are opposing capital surcharges for big lenders because they say their banking systems are different from those in the U.S., U.K. and Switzerland, where the largest blow-ups occurred during the crisis, members say. U.S. regulators have been skeptical of contingent and bail-in capital as alternatives to straightforward surcharges, arguing that they\u2019re untested mechanisms that might not fulfill their intended purposes during the next crisis.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe can\u2019t rely on them yet,\u201d Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., said in a telephone interview last week. \u201cThere\u2019s not much of a market for them. Triggering them could end up destabilizing the bank and the markets. We just got rid of TruPS because they did not provide loss absorption in the crisis. We could end up with the same problem with these new instruments.\u201d <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Low US mortgage rates are having an effect<\/a> – just not the intended effect, that’s all:<\/p>\n

Rates for 30-year fixed loans declined to 4.19 percent in the week ended today from 4.27 percent, Freddie Mac said in a statement. It is the lowest rate since the McLean, Virginia- based company began tracking the data in 1971. The average 15- year rate tumbled to 3.62 percent from 3.72 percent.<\/p>\n

A six-month decline in mortgage rates has spurred a surge in refinancing while doing little to increase property demand as U.S. unemployment hovers near 10 percent. Sales of existing homes were the second-lowest on record in August, the National Association of Realtors in Washington said Sept. 23.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Canadian preferred share market had another strong day on extremely heavy volume, with PerpetualDiscounts up 22bp and FixedResets gaining 6bp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices<\/strong>
Values are provisional and are finalized monthly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Index<\/td>\nMean
Current
Yield
(at bid)<\/td>\n		Median
YTW<\/td>\n		Median
Average
Trading
Value<\/td>\n		Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)<\/td>\n		Issues<\/td>\nDay’s Perf.<\/td>\nIndex Value<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ratchet<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.00<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.0907 %<\/td>\n2,189.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FixedFloater<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.00<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.0907 %<\/td>\n3,317.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Floater<\/td>\n2.86 %<\/td>\n3.18 %<\/td>\n77,065<\/td>\n19.30<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n0.0907 %<\/td>\n2,364.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OpRet<\/td>\n4.91 %<\/td>\n3.53 %<\/td>\n77,631<\/td>\n0.13<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n-0.0905 %<\/td>\n2,371.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SplitShare<\/td>\n5.88 %<\/td>\n-28.27 %<\/td>\n64,448<\/td>\n0.09<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n0.4684 %<\/td>\n2,394.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Interest-Bearing<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.00<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n-0.0905 %<\/td>\n2,168.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Perpetual-Premium<\/td>\n5.70 %<\/td>\n5.09 %<\/td>\n146,736<\/td>\n4.84<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n0.0495 %<\/td>\n2,012.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Perpetual-Discount<\/td>\n5.43 %<\/td>\n5.42 %<\/td>\n238,044<\/td>\n14.71<\/td>\n58<\/td>\n0.2222 %<\/td>\n2,007.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FixedReset<\/td>\n5.27 %<\/td>\n3.07 %<\/td>\n337,204<\/td>\n3.28<\/td>\n47<\/td>\n0.0619 %<\/td>\n2,271.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Performance Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Issue<\/td>\nIndex<\/td>\nChange<\/td>\nNotes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BAM.PR.R<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n-2.26 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2040-10-14
\nMaturity Price : 25.95
\nEvaluated at bid price : 26.00
\nBid-YTW : 4.36 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BNA.PR.C<\/td>\nSplitShare<\/td>\n1.04 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Hard Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2019-01-10
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.33
\nBid-YTW : 6.12 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BNS.PR.L<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n1.05 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2040-10-14
\nMaturity Price : 22.03
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.15
\nBid-YTW : 5.09 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TD.PR.P<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n1.06 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2040-10-14
\nMaturity Price : 24.62
\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.86
\nBid-YTW : 5.28 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
GWO.PR.J<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n2.26 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Call
\nMaturity Date\t: 2014-01-30
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 27.20
\nBid-YTW : 3.26 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Volume Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Issue<\/td>\nIndex<\/td>\nShares
Traded<\/td>\n		Notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CM.PR.A<\/td>\nOpRet<\/td>\n168,500<\/td>\nCalled for redemption<\/a>. RBC crossed 80,000 at 24.98; Desjardins bought 80,000 from Nesbitt at the same price.
\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Call
\nMaturity Date\t: 2010-11-30
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.98
\nBid-YTW : 4.04 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CM.PR.E<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n146,131<\/td>\nScotia crossed 25,000 at 25.25. RBC crossed three blocks, of 30,000 shares, 10,000 and 59,800, all at 25.52.
\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Call
\nMaturity Date\t: 2012-11-30
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 25.25
\nBid-YTW : 4.99 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RY.PR.C<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n113,838<\/td>\nScotia crossed 100,000 at 22.55.
\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2040-10-14
\nMaturity Price : 22.37
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.52
\nBid-YTW : 5.18 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BMO.PR.K<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n112,501<\/td>\nTD crossed two blocks of 50,000 each, both at 24.89.
\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2040-10-14
\nMaturity Price : 24.58
\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.81
\nBid-YTW : 5.36 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RY.PR.R<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n107,820<\/td>\nTD crossed 25,000 at 27.85. RBC crossed 30,000 at 27.85 and 42,000 at 27.90.
\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Call
\nMaturity Date\t: 2014-03-26
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 27.85
\nBid-YTW : 3.03 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RY.PR.E<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n66,388<\/td>\nScotia crossed blocks of 25,000 and 10,000 at 22.10.
\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2040-10-14
\nMaturity Price : 21.94
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.06
\nBid-YTW : 5.17 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
There were 72 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It looks like the Flash Crash will be simply an excuse: Data firm Nanex LLC has since questioned regulators’ finding, suggesting Waddell’s algorithm actually did factor in price because data show a slowdown in selling …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12559","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-action"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12559","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12559"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12559\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12559"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}