{"id":1520,"date":"2007-11-27T14:09:50","date_gmt":"2007-11-27T18:09:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1520"},"modified":"2007-11-27T14:09:50","modified_gmt":"2007-11-27T18:09:50","slug":"bmo-tier-1-capital-october-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=1520","title":{"rendered":"BMO Tier 1 Capital &#8211; October, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>BMO has released its <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.bmo.com\/bmo\/files\/financial%20information%20slides\/3\/1\/Q4%20Eng%20PR%20with%20fs%20%20Logo.pdf\">Fourth Quarter Report<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.bmo.com\/ir\/qtrinfo\/1\/2007-q4\/Suppq407.pdf\">Supplementary Package<\/a>, so it&#8217;s time to recalculate how much room they have to issue new preferred shares &#8211; assuming they want to, in this environment!<\/p>\n<p>Step One is to analyze their Tier 1 Capital, reproducing the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=558\">summary I prepared last year<\/a>:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">BMO Capital Structure<br \/>\nOctober, 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total Tier 1 Capital<\/td>\n<td>16,994<\/td>\n<td>16,641<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common Shareholders&#8217; Equity<\/td>\n<td>83.8%<\/td>\n<td>86.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Shares<\/td>\n<td>8.5%<\/td>\n<td>6.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Innovative Tier 1 Capital Instruments<\/td>\n<td>14.3%<\/td>\n<td>13.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Non-Controlling Interests in Subsidiaries<\/td>\n<td>0.2%<\/td>\n<td>0.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Goodwill<\/td>\n<td>-6.7%<\/td>\n<td>-6.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Next, the\u00a0issuance capacity (from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=561\">Part 3 of last year&#8217;s series<\/a>):<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">BMO<br \/>\nTier 1 Issuance Capacity<br \/>\nOctober 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity Capital<\/td>\n<td>(A)<\/td>\n<td>13,126<\/td>\n<td>13,403<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Non-Equity Tier 1 Limit<\/td>\n<td>(B=A\/3)<\/td>\n<td>4,375<\/td>\n<td>4,468<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Innovative Tier 1 Capital<\/td>\n<td>(C)<\/td>\n<td>2,422<\/td>\n<td>2,192<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Limit<\/td>\n<td>(D=B-C)<\/td>\n<td>1,953<\/td>\n<td>2,276<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Y\/E Actual<\/td>\n<td>(E)<\/td>\n<td>1,446<\/td>\n<td>1,046<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>New Issuance Capacity<\/td>\n<td>(F=D-E)<\/td>\n<td>507<\/td>\n<td>880<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">\u00a0<em>Items A, C &#038; E are taken from the table<br \/>\n&#8220;Capital and Risk Weighted Assets&#8221;<br \/>\nof the supplementary information;<br \/>\nNote that Item A includes Goodwill and non-controlling interest<\/em><em><br \/>\nItem B is as per OSFI Guidelines<br \/>\nItems D &#038; F are my calculations<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>and the all important Risk-Weighted Asset Ratios!<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">BMO<br \/>\nRisk-Weighted Asset Ratios<br \/>\nOctober 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2007<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>Note<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity Capital<\/td>\n<td>A<\/td>\n<td>13,126<\/td>\n<td>13,403<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Risk-Weighted Assets<\/td>\n<td>B<\/td>\n<td>178,687<\/td>\n<td>162,794\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity\/RWA<\/td>\n<td>C=A\/B<\/td>\n<td>7.35%\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>8.23%\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tier 1 Ratio<\/td>\n<td>D<\/td>\n<td>9.51%\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>10.22%\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Capital Ratio<\/td>\n<td>E<\/td>\n<td>11.74%\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>11.76%\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">\u00a0<em>A is taken from the table &#8220;Issuance Capacity&#8221;, above<br \/>\nB, D &#038; E are taken from BMO&#8217;s Supplementary Report<br \/>\nC is my calculation.<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Note that while the Equity\/RWA ratio and Tier 1 Ratio have both deteriorated over the year, BMO&#8217;s Total Capital Ratio has remained constant. This is due to issuance of about $1-billion in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1491\">Subordinated Debt<\/a>, which is junior to deposits, but senior to Tier 1 Capital.<\/p>\n<p>It is disappointing to see the deterioration in the Equity\/RWA ratio over the year &#8211; I consider this to be a measure of the safety of the preferred shares, as it is the &#8220;total risk&#8221; of the bank&#8217;s assets (as defined by the regulators) divided by the value of capital junior to preferreds (which therefore takes the first loss). It is by no means anything to lose a lot of sleep over, as it still remains strong &#8211; the preferreds are better protected than the sub-debt of a lot of global banks &#8211; but &#8230; geez, the direction&#8217;s wrong!<\/p>\n<p>I won&#8217;t discuss the annual results to any great extent &#8211; there will be innumerable reports over the next few months released by analysts with a great deal more time to spend on the matter than I have (although their focus will not be the prospects for the preferred shares), but there is one snippet from the fourth quarter report that bears highlighting:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>In the fourth quarter, BMO recorded $318 million ($211 million after tax) of charges for certain trading activities and valuation adjustments related to deterioration in capital markets. The charges included $160 million in respect of trading and structured-credit related positions and preferred shares; $134 million related to Canadian asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP); and $15 million related to capital notes in the Links Finance Corporation (Links) and Parkland Finance Corporation (Parkland) structured investment vehicles.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Well! It isn&#8217;t often that preferred share trading &#038; underwriting have enough influence on profit to be worth a mention! It&#8217;s a pity they didn&#8217;t break out this amount; but investors who have sufferred through a horrendous time for the past six months in the preferred share market may at least take comfort that BMO took a good hit as well!\n<\/p>\n<p><!--b6b8c9062bcb6e2c89411f411e0b0800--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BMO has released its Fourth Quarter Report and Supplementary Package, so it&#8217;s time to recalculate how much room they have to issue new preferred shares &#8211; assuming they want to, in this environment! Step One &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-regulatory-capital"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1520\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}