{"id":1530,"date":"2007-11-29T13:52:44","date_gmt":"2007-11-29T17:52:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1530"},"modified":"2007-11-29T13:52:44","modified_gmt":"2007-11-29T17:52:44","slug":"td-tier-1-capital-october-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=1530","title":{"rendered":"TD Tier 1 Capital : October 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>TD has released its <a href=\"http:\/\/www.td.com\/investor\/2007\/2007q4qr.pdf\">Fourth Quarter Report<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.td.com\/investor\/2007\/2007q4_sup.pdf\">Supplementary Information<\/a>; I will analyze this in the same format as\u00a0was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1520\">recently done for BMO<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Step One is to analyze their Tier 1 Capital, reproducing the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=558\">summary<\/a>\u00a0I prepared last year:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">TD\u00a0Capital Structure<br \/>\nOctober, 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total Tier 1 Capital<\/td>\n<td>15,645<\/td>\n<td>17,079<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common Shareholders&#8217; Equity<\/td>\n<td>131.5%<\/td>\n<td>112.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Shares<\/td>\n<td>6.2%<\/td>\n<td>7.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Innovative Tier 1 Capital Instruments<\/td>\n<td>11.1%<\/td>\n<td>7.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Non-Controlling Interests in Subsidiaries<\/td>\n<td>0.1%<\/td>\n<td>14.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Goodwill<\/td>\n<td>-49.0%<\/td>\n<td>-41.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>\u00a0The change in the &#8220;Non-Controlling Interests in Subsidiaries&#8221; bears review: TD&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.td.com\/investor\/2007\/2007q2qr2.pdf\">Second Quarter Report<\/a> advises:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Bank\u2019s non-controlling interests in subsidiaries as at April 30, 2007 declined $2.4 billion from October 31, 2006 due to the privatization of TD Banknorth in the current quarter.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Next, the issuance capacity (from\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=561\">Part\u00a03 of last year&#8217;s series<\/a>):<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">TD<br \/>\nTier 1 Issuance Capacity<br \/>\nOctober 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity Capital<\/td>\n<td>(A)<\/td>\n<td>12,931<\/td>\n<td>14,510<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Non-Equity Tier 1 Limit<\/td>\n<td>(B=A\/3)<\/td>\n<td>4,310<\/td>\n<td>4,837<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Innovative Tier 1 Capital<\/td>\n<td>(C)<\/td>\n<td>1,740<\/td>\n<td>1,250<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Limit<\/td>\n<td>(D=B-C)<\/td>\n<td>2,570<\/td>\n<td>3,587<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Y\/E Actual<\/td>\n<td>(E)<\/td>\n<td>974<\/td>\n<td>1,319<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Post Y\/E Issuance<\/td>\n<td>(F)<\/td>\n<td>250<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>New Issuance Capacity<\/td>\n<td>(G=D-E-F)<\/td>\n<td>1,346<\/td>\n<td>2,268<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><em>Items A, C &#038; E are taken from the table<br \/>\n&#8220;Risk Weighted Assets and Capital&#8221;<br \/>\nof the supplementary information;<br \/>\nNote that Item A includes Goodwill and non-controlling interest<br \/>\n<\/em><em>Item B is as per OSFI Guidelines<br \/>\n<\/em><em>Items D, F &#038; G\u00a0are my calculations<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Items (E) and\u00a0(F) need a little explanation. The\u00a0decline in preferreds outstanding\u00a0is due to the redemption of\u00a0\u00a0$344-million worth of preferred shares issued by TD Mortgage Investment Corporation, mentioned in Note 12 of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.td.com\/ar2006\/pdfs\/ar2006.pdf\">2006 Annual Report<\/a>. The post-Y\/E issuance is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1409\">TD.PR.P, which settled November 1<\/a>, subsequent to year-end.<\/p>\n<p>Of the $974-million outstanding, $350-million is TD.PR.M and $200-million is TD.PR.N. Both are retractibles, but have been grandfathered by OSFI such that they count towards Tier 1 Capital. I do not have the details of the grandfathering, but given that they both carry coupons less than the TD.PR.P retractible &#8211; which is in turn less than what a new issue would carry &#8211; we can expect the two retractibles to stay on TD&#8217;s books for quite a while.<\/p>\n<p>We can now show\u00a0the all important Risk-Weighted Asset Ratios!<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">TD<br \/>\nRisk-Weighted Asset Ratios<br \/>\nOctober 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2007<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>Note<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity Capital<\/td>\n<td>A<\/td>\n<td>12,931<\/td>\n<td>14,510<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Risk-Weighted Assets<\/td>\n<td>B<\/td>\n<td>152,519<\/td>\n<td>141,879<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity\/RWA<\/td>\n<td>C=A\/B<\/td>\n<td>8.48%<\/td>\n<td>10.23%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tier 1 Ratio<\/td>\n<td>D<\/td>\n<td>10.3%<\/td>\n<td>12.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Capital Ratio<\/td>\n<td>E<\/td>\n<td>13.0%<\/td>\n<td>13.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><em>A is taken from the table &#8220;Issuance Capacity&#8221;, above<br \/>\nB, D &#038; E are taken from\u00a0the Supplementary Report<br \/>\nC is my calculation.<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Note that, as with BMO,\u00a0the Equity\/RWA ratio and Tier 1 Ratio have both deteriorated over the year,\u00a0while the\u00a0Total Capital Ratio has remained constant. This is largely\u00a0due to an increase in the amount of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1491\">Subordinated Debt<\/a>, which is junior to deposits, but senior to Tier 1 Capital.<\/p>\n<p>It is disappointing to see the deterioration in the Equity\/RWA ratio over the year &#8211; I consider this to be a measure of the safety of the preferred shares, as it is the &#8220;total risk&#8221; of the bank&#8217;s assets (as defined by the regulators) divided by the value of capital junior to preferreds (which therefore takes the first loss). It is by no means anything to lose a lot of sleep over, as it still remains strong &#8211; the preferreds are better protected than the sub-debt of a lot of global banks &#8211; but &#8230; geez, the direction&#8217;s wrong!<\/p>\n<p>I won&#8217;t discuss the annual results to any great extent &#8211; there will be innumerable reports over the next few months released by analysts with a great deal more time to spend on the matter than I have.<\/p>\n<p>I am advised that the bank expects the Tier 1 Capital Ratio to be 8.75-9.00% after the deal with Commerce Bancorp closes next spring, but I am unable to verify this claim. During an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.td.com\/investor\/2007\/02oct07transcript.pdf\">analyst call on October 2<\/a>, the question was asked and not answered:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Andre Hardy &#8211; RBC Capital Markets &#8211; Analyst<\/em> Just a few numbers questions, Colleen, to start with. You usually provide us with a tangible equity ratio as well in your presentation, so could you please update us on that? And as well, where would that Tier 1 capital ratio be under Basel II?<br \/>\n<strong>&#8230;<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Colleen Johnston &#8211; TD Bank Financial Group &#8211; CFO<\/em> So you had a number of questions, Andre. Why don&#8217;t I start with the Basel II scenario? I think it&#8217;s probably a little premature at this time to comment on Basel II. We&#8217;re still going through the process around with OSFI in terms of risk-weighted assets in the new regime which will obviously take effect in Q1 of 2008. And you&#8217;re well aware of then the deferral that we have in terms of the TDA deduction from Tier 1. So we&#8217;re not going to talk about Basel II today.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Update<\/strong>: The expected Tier 1 Capital Ratio is announced in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.td.com\/investor\/2007\/02_Oct_2007_Presentation.pdf\">October 2 Presentation<\/a>, page 5, slide 10. Oops!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TD has released its Fourth Quarter Report and Supplementary Information; I will analyze this in the same format as\u00a0was recently done for BMO.\u00a0 Step One is to analyze their Tier 1 Capital, reproducing the\u00a0summary\u00a0I prepared &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-regulatory-capital"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1530"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1530\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}