{"id":1536,"date":"2007-11-30T14:10:32","date_gmt":"2007-11-30T18:10:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1536"},"modified":"2007-11-30T14:10:32","modified_gmt":"2007-11-30T18:10:32","slug":"ry-tier-1-capital-october-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=1536","title":{"rendered":"RY Tier 1 Capital : October 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Royal\u00a0Bank has released its <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/investorrelations\/pdf\/q407release.pdf\">Fourth Quarter, 2007, Report<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/investorrelations\/pdf\/supp_q407.pdf\">Supplementary Information<\/a>; I will analyze this in the same format as was has been recently done for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1531\">NA<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1520\">BMO<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1530\">TD<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Step One is to analyze their Tier 1 Capital, reproducing the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=558\">summary produced last year<\/a>:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">RY\u00a0Capital Structure<br \/>\nOctober, 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total Tier 1 Capital<\/td>\n<td>23,383<\/td>\n<td>21,478<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common Shareholders&#8217; Equity<\/td>\n<td>95.2%<\/td>\n<td>98.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Shares<\/td>\n<td>10.0%<\/td>\n<td>6.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Innovative Tier 1 Capital Instruments<\/td>\n<td>14.9%<\/td>\n<td>15.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Non-Controlling Interests in Subsidiaries<\/td>\n<td>0.1%<\/td>\n<td>0.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Goodwill<\/td>\n<td>-20.3%<\/td>\n<td>-19.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Next, the issuance capacity (from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=561\">Part 3 of last year&#8217;s series<\/a>):<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">RY<br \/>\nTier 1 Issuance Capacity<br \/>\nOctober 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity Capital<\/td>\n<td>(A)<\/td>\n<td>17,545<\/td>\n<td>16,911<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Non-Equity Tier 1 Limit<\/td>\n<td>(B=A\/3)<\/td>\n<td>5,848<\/td>\n<td>5,637<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Innovative Tier 1 Capital<\/td>\n<td>(C)<\/td>\n<td>3,494<\/td>\n<td>3,222<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Limit<\/td>\n<td>(D=B-C)<\/td>\n<td>2,354<\/td>\n<td>2,415<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Preferred Y\/E Actual<\/td>\n<td>(E)<\/td>\n<td>2,344<\/td>\n<td>1,345<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>New Issuance Capacity<\/td>\n<td>(F=D-E)<\/td>\n<td>10<\/td>\n<td>1,070<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><em>Items A, C &#038; E are taken from the table<br \/>\n&#8220;Capital&#8221;<br \/>\nof the supplementary information;<br \/>\nNote that Item A includes Goodwill and\u00a0non-controlling interest<br \/>\n<\/em><em>Item B is as per OSFI Guidelines<br \/>\n<\/em><em><em>Items D &#038;\u00a0F are my calculations.<\/em><\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>We can now show the all important Risk-Weighted Asset Ratios!<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">RY<br \/>\nRisk-Weighted Asset Ratios<br \/>\nOctober 2007<br \/>\n&#038; October 2007<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>Note<\/td>\n<td>2007<\/td>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity Capital<\/td>\n<td>A<\/td>\n<td>17,545<\/td>\n<td>16,911<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Risk-Weighted Assets<\/td>\n<td>B<\/td>\n<td>247,635<\/td>\n<td>223,709<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Equity\/RWA<\/td>\n<td>C=A\/B<\/td>\n<td>7.09%<\/td>\n<td>7.56%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tier 1 Ratio<\/td>\n<td>D<\/td>\n<td>9.4%<\/td>\n<td>9.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Capital Ratio<\/td>\n<td>E<\/td>\n<td>11.5%<\/td>\n<td>11.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><em>A is taken from the table &#8220;Issuance Capacity&#8221;, above<br \/>\nB, D &#038; E are taken from the Supplementary Report<br \/>\nC is my calculation.<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Note that, as with\u00a0all banks examined thus far, the Equity\/RWA ratio and Tier 1 Ratio have both deteriorated over the year, but for NA and RY the Total Capital Ratio has also declined. RY&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1491\">Subordinated Debt<\/a> outstanding has been fairly constant over the past year, although $1-billion-odd of direct subordinated debt has been replaced with &#8220;Trust Subordinated Notes&#8221;. These are described in RY&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/investorrelations\/pdf\/q207report.pdf\">Second Quarter 2007 Report<\/a>\u00a0&#8211; seems to me that RY was able to get away with an extraordinarily low rate of interest on them &#8211; about 5bp over 7.5 year deposit notes, as far as I can make out.<\/p>\n<p>And, of course,\u00a0RY\u00a0has done\u00a0quite a bit of opportunistic &#8211; and very well timed! &#8211; preferred share issuance in the past fiscal year: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=242\">RY.PR.C<\/a> (settled 2006-11-1), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=395\">RY.PR.D<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=497\">RY.PR.E<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=662\">RY.PR.F<\/a> &#038;\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=765\">RY.PR.G<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It is disappointing to see the deterioration in the Equity\/RWA ratio over the year &#8211; I consider this to be a measure of the safety of the preferred shares, as it is the &#8220;total risk&#8221; of the bank&#8217;s assets (as defined by the regulators) divided by the value of capital junior to preferreds (which therefore takes the first loss). It is by no means anything to lose a lot of sleep over, as it still remains strong &#8211; the preferreds are better protected than the sub-debt of a lot of global banks &#8211; but &#8230; geez, the direction&#8217;s wrong!<\/p>\n<p>I won&#8217;t discuss the annual results to any great extent &#8211; there will be innumerable reports over the next few months released by analysts with a great deal more time to spend on the matter than I have.\n<\/p>\n<p><!--9a783db6d33e5c11d96a90dad284d968--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Royal\u00a0Bank has released its Fourth Quarter, 2007, Report and Supplementary Information; I will analyze this in the same format as was has been recently done for NA,\u00a0BMO and TD. Step One is to analyze their &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-regulatory-capital"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}