{"id":1772,"date":"2008-02-05T14:24:39","date_gmt":"2008-02-05T18:24:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1772"},"modified":"2008-02-05T14:24:39","modified_gmt":"2008-02-05T18:24:39","slug":"index-performance-january-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=1772","title":{"rendered":"Index Performance, January 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Performance of the HIMIPref\u2122 Indices for\u00a0January, 2008,\u00a0was:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">Total Return<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Performance<br \/>\nJanuary 2008<\/td>\n<td>Three Months<br \/>\nto<br \/>\nJanuary 31, 2008<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ratchet<\/td>\n<td>-0.28%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0+0.67%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FixFloat<\/td>\n<td>-1.57%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0-2.97%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Floater<\/td>\n<td>+3.17%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0-17.64%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OpRet<\/td>\n<td>+0.47%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0+1.75%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SplitShare<\/td>\n<td>+0.31%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0-1.01%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Interest<\/td>\n<td>+1.37%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0+1.04%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PerpetualPremium<\/td>\n<td>+0.19%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0+1.36%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>+0.40%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0+2.98%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">Funds (see below for calculations)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CPD<\/td>\n<td>+0.00%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0-0.08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DPS.UN<\/td>\n<td>-0.97%<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0-0.21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>The FloatingRate index bounced back (just a little bit!) from its disastrous <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1647\">performance in December<\/a>. The tepid returns for the two perpetual sub-indices mask\u00a0a great deal of excitement &#8211; at its peak on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1692\">January 16<\/a> the PerpetualDiscount index was up 1.85% on the month, while at its trough on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1715\">January 21<\/a> it was down 1.23%. The downdraft was caused by\u00a0a new issue: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1698\">BNS.PR.O, announced January 17<\/a>. There was extreme fear that this could presage <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1721\">another\u00a0hit to\u00a0the market<\/a> as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1256\">happened\u00a0in September<\/a>, but\u00a0by the time\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1723\">TD.PR.Q was\u00a0announced January 22<\/a> the worst was over.<\/p>\n<p>Claymore has published <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claymoreinvestments.ca\/ETFs\/Public\/fund\/History.aspx?ID=4dbd3e8b-3e6f-4377-810d-6c884faef157\">NAV data<\/a> for its exchange traded fund (CPD) and I have derived the following table:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"5\">CPD Return, 1- &#038; 3-month, to\u00a0January 31<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Date<\/td>\n<td>NAV<\/td>\n<td>Distribution<\/td>\n<td>Return for Sub-Period<\/td>\n<td>Monthly Return<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>October 31, 2007<\/td>\n<td>18.19<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>November 30<\/td>\n<td>17.97<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>-1.21%<\/td>\n<td>-1.21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>December 24<\/td>\n<td>17.75<\/td>\n<td>0.2219<\/td>\n<td>+0.01%<\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"2\">+1.14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>December 31, 2007<\/td>\n<td>17.95<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>+1.13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>January 31, 2008<\/td>\n<td>17.95<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>0.00%<\/td>\n<td>0.00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><strong>Quarterly Return<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>-0.08%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>The DPS.UN NAV for\u00a0January 30 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sentryselect.com\/English\/Products\/DiversifiedPreferredShareTrust\/default.aspx\">has been published<\/a> so we may calculate the January returns (approximately!) for this closed end fund:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">DPS.UN NAV Return, January-ish 2008<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Date<\/td>\n<td>NAV<\/td>\n<td>Distribution<\/td>\n<td>Return for period<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>December 27, 2007<\/td>\n<td>$21.07<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>January 30, 2008<\/td>\n<td>$21.02<\/td>\n<td>$0.00<\/td>\n<td>-0.24%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">Adjustment for\u00a0December stub-period<\/td>\n<td>-0.67%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">Adjustment for\u00a0January stub-period<\/td>\n<td>-0.06%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Estimated\u00a0January Return<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>-0.97%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><em>CPD had a NAV of $17.83 on December 27 and $17.95 on December 31. The estimated December end-of-month stub period return for CPD was therefore +0.67%, which is\u00a0subtracted from\u00a0the DPS.UN total return when estimating the return for January.<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\"><em>CPD had a NAV of $17.96 on\u00a0January 30\u00a0and $17.95 on\u00a0January 31. The estimated\u00a0January end-of-month stub period return for CPD was therefore -0.06%, which is added to the DPS.UN total return when estimating the return for January.<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Now, to see the DPS.UN quarterly NAV approximate return, we refer to the calculations for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1647\">December<\/a>:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\">DPS.UN NAV Returns, three-month-ish to end-January-ish, 2008<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>November-ish<\/td>\n<td>-1.14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>December-ish<\/td>\n<td>+1.93%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>January-ish<\/td>\n<td>-0.97%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Three-months-ish<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>-0.21%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p><!--1ab01802b3b91b0cfd722d6acabb15f9-->\n<\/p>\n<p><!--8d1faa43d0af78d9143f24ba30f1f9b8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Performance of the HIMIPref\u2122 Indices for\u00a0January, 2008,\u00a0was: Total Return Index Performance January 2008 Three Months to January 31, 2008 Ratchet -0.28% \u00a0+0.67% FixFloat -1.57% \u00a0-2.97% Floater +3.17% \u00a0-17.64% OpRet +0.47% \u00a0+1.75% SplitShare +0.31% \u00a0-1.01% Interest &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1772","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-index-construction-and-reporting"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1772","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1772"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1772\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1772"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1772"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}