{"id":2004,"date":"2008-04-01T15:46:26","date_gmt":"2008-04-01T19:46:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=2004"},"modified":"2008-04-01T15:46:26","modified_gmt":"2008-04-01T19:46:26","slug":"best-worst-performers-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=2004","title":{"rendered":"Best &amp; Worst Performers: March 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>These are total returns, with dividends presumed to have been reinvested at the bid price on the ex-date. The list has been restricted to issues in the HIMIPref\u2122 indices.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td>Issue<\/td>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>DBRS Rating<\/td>\n<td>Monthly Performance<\/td>\n<td>Notes (&#8220;Now&#8221; means &#8220;March 31&#8221;)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SLF.PR.C<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-1(low)<\/td>\n<td>-10.82%<\/td>\n<td>A rebound from excellent performance in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1868\">February<\/a>. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.74% based on a bid of 19.53 and a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefshares.com\/glossary.html#limitMaturity\">limitMaturity<\/a>.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SLF.PR.D<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-1(low)<\/td>\n<td>-10.71%<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.74% based on a bid of 19.50 and a limitMaturity.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FTU.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>SplitShare<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-2<br \/>[Review Developing]<\/td>\n<td>-10.25%<\/td>\n<td>Volatile! <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1773\">Performed well in January<\/a>, poorly in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1868\">February<\/a>. Asset coverage of just under 1.4:1 as of March 14 according to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.financial15.com\/valuations.html\">the company<\/a>. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 9.29% based on a bid of 8.52 and a hardMaturity 2012-12-1 at 10.00. Given the relatively low asset coverage, deep discount to par and the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=1936\">DBRS Review of the sector<\/a>, it might be wise to view these as an equity substitute rather than as a preferred issue.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BMO.PR.K<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualDiscount<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-1<\/td>\n<td>-9.77%<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.98% based on a bid of 22.25 and a limitMaturity.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BNA.PR.B<\/td>\n<td>SplitShare<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-2(low)<\/td>\n<td>-9.20%<\/td>\n<td>Asset coverage of 2.8+:1 as of February 29, according to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bamsplit.com\/investor_nav.htm\">the company<\/a>. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 8.86% based on a bid of 19.65 and a hardMaturity 2016-3-25 at 25.00. Compare with BNA.PR.A (6.47% to 2010-9-30) and BNA.PR.C (7.57% to 2019-1-10).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&#8230;<\/td>\n<td>&#8230;<\/td>\n<td>&#8230;<\/td>\n<td>&#8230;<\/td>\n<td>&#8230;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CL.PR.B<\/td>\n<td>PerpetualPremium<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-1(low)<\/td>\n<td>+1.32%<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of -7.53% (that&#8217;s right, negative) based on a bid of 26.04 and a call 2008-4-30 at 25.75. Even the call 2011-1-30 at 25.00 gives rise to a yield of 4.69% &#8230; this issue looks rich.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FIG.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>InterestBearing<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-2<\/td>\n<td>+1.37%<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.12% based on a bid of 10.00 and a call 2008-4-30 at 10.00.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BCE.PR.B<\/td>\n<td>Ratchet<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-2(low)<br \/>[Review Negative]<\/td>\n<td>+1.49%<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BAM.PR.I<\/td>\n<td>OpRet<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-2(low)<\/td>\n<td>+1.78%<\/td>\n<td>Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.96% based on a bid of 25.71 and a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefshares.com\/glossary.html#softMaturity\">softMaturity<\/a> 2013-12-30 at 25.00. Compare with the other BAM OpRets: BAM.PR.H (5.37% to 2012-3-30) and BAM.PR.J (5.25% to 2018-3-30).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BCE.PR.G<\/td>\n<td>FixFloat<\/td>\n<td>Pfd-2(low)<br \/>Review Negative<\/td>\n<td>+2.20%<\/td>\n<td>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>These are total returns, with dividends presumed to have been reinvested at the bid price on the ex-date. The list has been restricted to issues in the HIMIPref\u2122 indices. Issue Index DBRS Rating Monthly Performance &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2004","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issue-comments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2004"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2004\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}