{"id":27232,"date":"2014-12-20T00:35:04","date_gmt":"2014-12-20T05:35:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=27232"},"modified":"2014-12-20T00:35:04","modified_gmt":"2014-12-20T05:35:04","slug":"december-19-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=27232","title":{"rendered":"December 19, 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Canadian inflation was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2014-12-19\/canadian-inflation-slowed-more-than-forecast-to-2-0-on-gasoline.html\">tamer than expected<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Canada\u2019s inflation rate slowed more than economists forecast in November, returning to the central bank\u2019s target on a drop in gasoline prices.<\/p>\n<p>The consumer price index rose 2.0 percent from a year ago following the October pace of 2.4 percent, Statistics Canada said today from Ottawa. The core rate, which excludes eight volatile products including fruit, vegetables and gasoline, slowed to 2.1 percent following the October pace of 2.3 percent, which was the fastest in almost three years.<\/p>\n<p>Economists forecast the total rate would rise 2.2 percent and core by 2.4 percent, according to median responses in separate Bloomberg News surveys.<\/p>\n<p>Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz has said inflation will slow to a 1.4 percent pace in the second quarter of next year, ending a period of faster-than-expected gains linked to temporary factors such as a weaker currency and price increases for products such as meat. Policy makers have kept their benchmark overnight lending rate at 1 percent for more than four years and economists surveyed by Bloomberg predict Poloz won\u2019t tighten for about another year.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230; which <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2014-12-19\/canada-dollar-approaches-5-year-low-as-inflation-trails-forecast.html\">didn&#8217;t do the dollar much good<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Canada\u2019s dollar approached a five-year low after a report showed inflation slowed more than forecast in November, adding to speculation slumping crude-oil prices will damp economic growth and keep interest rates low for longer.<\/p>\n<p>The currency fell for a fourth week as crude, the nation\u2019s biggest export, traded at almost the lowest since 2009. Canadian two-year government bonds\u2019 yield advantage over U.S. peers shrank to the least since 2010 as traders priced in a rate increase by the Federal Reserve in the first half of 2015 and began to push chances for Bank of Canada rate action into 2016.<br \/><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>The loonie, as the Canadian dollar is known for the image of the aquatic bird on the C$1 coin, weakened 0.2 percent to C$1.1600 per U.S. dollar at 5 p.m. Toronto time. It touched C$1.1674 on Dec. 15, the weakest level since July 2009. One loonie purchases 86.21 U.S. cents.<br \/><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>Canada\u2019s two-year debt yielded 37 basis points, or 0.37 percentage point, more than comparable-maturity Treasuries, compared with 63 basis points in October. The Canadian yields have been little changed during the period, while U.S. yields rose as investors sold Treasuries. Two-year securities are more sensitive to expectations for changes in central-bank policy than longer-maturity debt, which tends to reflect expectations for inflation.<br \/><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>Canadian retail sales were little changed in October at C$42.8 billion ($36.9 billion), Statistics Canada said in another report. A Bloomberg survey of economists forecast a 0.3 percent decrease.<\/p>\n<p>Ontario, Canada\u2019s most populous province, had its credit rating downgraded to AA- from AA by Fitch Ratings. The company cited the difficult actions needed to meet the province\u2019s goal for a balanced budget by 2017-18.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230; but <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2014-12-19\/canada-stocks-headed-for-best-weekly-rally-since-2011.html\">equities seemed pretty happy<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Canadian stocks rose for a fourth day, capping their best week in five years, as energy producers led gains in a rally ignited by the Federal Reserve\u2019s pledge to be patient on boosting borrowing costs.<\/p>\n<p>Energy stocks in the Standard &#038; Poor\u2019s\/TSX Composite Index (SPTSX) rose 2.9 percent for a 13 percent gain this week, the most in five years. Trican Well Service Ltd. and TransGlobe Energy Corp. soared more than 8.8 percent. BlackBerry Ltd. dropped 1.2 percent after reporting third-quarter revenue short of analysts\u2019 estimates.<\/p>\n<p>The S&#038;P\/TSX index climbed 121.51 points, or 0.9 percent, to 14,468.26 at 4 p.m. in Toronto. The gauge surged 5.6 percent in the past four days as oil prices stabilized and Fed Chair Janet Yellen said the U.S. central bank will probably hold rates near zero at least through the first quarter.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>MetLife has been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2014-12-18\/metlife-gets-risk-tag-from-u-s-panel-faces-fed-oversight.html\">designated a systemically important financial institution<\/a> &#8211; and doesn&#8217;t like it:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Financial Stability Oversight Council voted to designate New York-based MetLife a SIFI, the insurer said today in a statement. The ruling subjects MetLife to stricter Federal Reserve oversight that could include tougher capital, leverage and liquidity requirements. The company can appeal in U.S. district court within 30 days.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe continue to believe that MetLife is not systemically important,\u201d the insurer said in the statement. \u201cThe company will carefully review the designation rationale as it considers its next steps.\u201d<br \/><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>The company has said that it wouldn\u2019t pose a risk to the broader financial system even if it were to fail, and Kandarian has called the insurance industry a source of stability. MetLife, based in New York, didn\u2019t take a bailout during the 2008 financial crisis.<\/p>\n<p>MetLife said today that FSOC should focus on activities that pose systemic risks, rather than on individual companies.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFSOC has already embraced this activities-based approach for the asset-management industry but has rejected it for the life-insurance industry,\u201d MetLife said in its statement.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. lawmakers voted last week to give the Fed more flexibility in how it sets rules after insurers said they shouldn\u2019t be subject to standards set for banks. Kandarian, in a Dec. 10 statement, praised Congress for passing the legislation, which he said would give the central bank the \u201copportunity to write rules that will preserve competition.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Simon Kennedy of Bloomberg draws our attention to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2014-12-19\/cold-war-era-lesson-of-suez-crisis-as-russia-burns-through-cash.html\">an interesting parallel to 1956<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The U.K., with France, followed Israel into Egypt in 1956 after President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the global commercial lifeline and kicked out the consortium that had been running the canal.<\/p>\n<p>Britain was exposed when sterling came under speculative attack. Investors targeted its $2.80 peg to the dollar, forcing the Bank of England to run down its reserves to defend it.<\/p>\n<p>For the U.K., \u201cSuez was also a financial crisis,\u201d according to a 2001 study by IMF historian James M. Boughton.<\/p>\n<p>As they struggled to maintain the $2 billion minimum viewed as necessary to stave off devaluation, British officials began looking for assistance. Knowing the U.S. was unlikely to help directly, they turned to the then decade-old IMF.<\/p>\n<p>No dice. U.S. Treasury Secretary George M. Humphrey told the U.K. he would only back it at the IMF when it was \u201cconforming to, rather than defying, the United Nations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On the verge of having to reveal its reserves had breached $2 billion, the British government buckled and announced a troop withdrawal from Egypt. That freed up $1.3 billion of international loans. Sterling was saved.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As noted very briefly above, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fitchratings.com\/creditdesk\/press_releases\/detail.cfm?pr_id=958755\">Fitch downgraded Ontari-ari-ari-owe<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>RATING DOWNGRADE: Difficult actions will be necessary to achieve the province&#8217;s deficit elimination goal of fiscal 2018 and budget options are likely to prove more limited given the extent of actions taken to date and use of one-time actions to achieve targets, in Fitch&#8217;s opinion. While the province is considering other fiscal options for fiscal 2016 should economic conditions restrain future revenue growth, the downgrade to &#8216;AA-&#8216; reflects Fitch&#8217;s concern that risks remain to achieving its goals and both debt burden and the accumulated deficit will remain significantly elevated, reflected in a rating level more consistent with an &#8216;AA-&#8216; rating.<br \/><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL IMBALANCE: The province had an accumulated deficit equal to 152% of operating revenues in fiscal 2014 (25.4% of gross domestic product [GDP]) due to, slow revenue growth, and increasing expenditures, and sizable capital borrowing. Annual deficits through the forecast period of fiscal 2018 will contribute to growth in the accumulated deficit.<br \/><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>LARGE AND GROWING DEBT BURDEN: The province has a high debt burden (net direct debt to GDP) with net debt to GDP at 38.4% for fiscal 2014, although debt service expense is a manageable 8% of annual expenditures. Fitch expects debt levels to increase through fiscal 2016, and then begin to decrease, given the province&#8217;s expectation of an annual deficit through that fiscal year and continued growth in GDP. Pensions are well funded.<\/p>\n<p>RATING SENSITIVITIES<\/p>\n<p>The rating is sensitive to the province&#8217;s commitment and success in achieving deficit elimination targets and restoring fiscal balance. Failure to enact budgets that follow a path toward articulated deficit elimination targets would result in negative rating pressure. Reaching deficit elimination targets ahead of forecast, sizable growth in GDP, and steady progress on lowering debt burden and the accumulated deficit would be positive credit factors.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It was a good day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts winning 37bp, FixedResets up 26bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 13bp. Volatility was high (although low by recent standards!) and dominated by FixedResets &#8211; particularly the low-spread and <a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=27014\">credit-uncertain Enbridge issues<\/a> which have been hit hard recently. Volume was average.<\/p>\n<p>For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I\u2019ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets\u2019 Implied Volatilities. This doesn\u2019t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.<\/p>\n<p>Remember that all rich \/cheap assessments are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>based on Implied Volatility Theory only\n<li>are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer\n<li>assume constant GOC-5 yield\n<li>assume constant Implied Volatility\n<li>assume constant spread<\/ul>\n<p>Here\u2019s TRP:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/impVol_TRP_141219.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/impVol_TRP_141219-300x246.jpg\" alt=\"impVol_TRP_141219\" width=\"400\" height=\"328\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-27237\" \/><\/a><br \/><i>Click for Big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>So according to this, TRP.PR.A, bid at 20.40, is $1.24 cheap, but it has already reset (at +192). TRP.PR.D, bid at 25.11 and resetting at +238bp on 2019-4-30 is $0.44 rich and TRP.PR.E, bid at 25.40 and resetting at +235bp on 2019-10-30, is $0.93 rich.<\/p>\n<p>This particular calculation is fascinating because it is apparent that &#8211; disregarding the TRP.PR.A outlier &#8211; the slope of the line used to calculate implied volatility is negative. I can&#8217;t remember seeing one of those since the Credit Crunch!<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/impVol_MFC_141219.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/impVol_MFC_141219-300x246.jpg\" alt=\"impVol_MFC_141219\" width=\"400\" height=\"328\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-27238\" \/><\/a><br \/><i>Click for Big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>Here, as has often been the case lately, it is apparent that<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>MFC.PR.F, resetting at 141bp on 2016-06-19 is in another world and distorting results again. It\u2019s the only deep-discount issue, bid at 20.65 \u2013 everything else is above or near par.\n<li>the slope determined by the higher-spread issues is unreasonably high if these are to be considered perpetual issues and unreasonably low if they are to be considered NVCC non-compliant issues<\/ul>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/impVol_BAM_141219.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/impVol_BAM_141219-300x246.jpg\" alt=\"impVol_BAM_141219\" width=\"400\" height=\"328\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-27239\" \/><\/a><br \/><i>Click for Big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>There continues to be extraordinary cheapness in the lowest-spread issue, BAM.PR.X, resetting at +180bp on 2017-6-30, which is bid at 20.26 and appears to be $0.95 cheap, while BAM.PR.R, resetting at +230bp 2016-6-30 is bid at 25.20 and appears to be $1.65 rich.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/impVol_FTS_141219.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/impVol_FTS_141219-300x246.jpg\" alt=\"impVol_FTS_141219\" width=\"400\" height=\"328\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-27240\" \/><\/a><br \/><i>Click for Big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>This is just weird because the middle is expensive and the ends are cheap but anyway \u2026 FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 18.60, looks $1.08 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp, and bid at 24.81, looks $1.02 expensive and resets 2019-3-1<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pairs_FR_141219.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pairs_FR_141219-300x222.jpg\" alt=\"pairs_FR_141219\" width=\"400\" height=\"296\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-27241\" \/><\/a><br \/><i>Click for Big<\/i><\/div>\n<p>The average break-even rate has declined from <a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=27134\">1.80%-2.00% at the time recent conversion decisions were made<\/a> to a current range of 1.50%-1.60%. This decline means that the estimated profit on TRP.PR.A conversion has declined from $0.48 to a mere $0.16 (at the lower end of the range).<\/p>\n<table border='1'>\n<tr>\n<td colspan='8'><strong>HIMIPref&trade; Preferred Indices<br \/>These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref&trade; Indices<\/strong><br \/>Values are provisional and are finalized monthly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Mean<br \/>Current<br \/>Yield<br \/>(at bid)<\/td>\n<td>Median<br \/>YTW<\/td>\n<td>Median<br \/>Average<br \/>Trading<br \/>Value<\/td>\n<td>Median<br \/>Mod Dur<br \/>(YTW)<\/td>\n<td>Issues<\/td>\n<td>Day&#8217;s Perf.<\/td>\n<td>Index Value<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ratchet<\/td>\n<td>0.00 %<\/td>\n<td>0.00 %<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0.00<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>1.1782 %<\/td>\n<td>2,479.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FixedFloater<\/td>\n<td>0.00 %<\/td>\n<td>0.00 %<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0.00<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>1.1782 %<\/td>\n<td>3,925.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Floater<\/td>\n<td>3.06 %<\/td>\n<td>3.16 %<\/td>\n<td>65,591<\/td>\n<td>19.34<\/td>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td>1.1782 %<\/td>\n<td>2,636.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OpRet<\/td>\n<td>4.41 %<\/td>\n<td>-2.78 %<\/td>\n<td>26,566<\/td>\n<td>0.08<\/td>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>0.0000 %<\/td>\n<td>2,748.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SplitShare<\/td>\n<td>4.31 %<\/td>\n<td>4.04 %<\/td>\n<td>39,459<\/td>\n<td>3.70<\/td>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td>-0.1804 %<\/td>\n<td>3,176.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Interest-Bearing<\/td>\n<td>0.00 %<\/td>\n<td>0.00 %<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0.00<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0.0000 %<\/td>\n<td>2,513.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Perpetual-Premium<\/td>\n<td>5.44 %<\/td>\n<td>-3.14 %<\/td>\n<td>75,182<\/td>\n<td>0.08<\/td>\n<td>20<\/td>\n<td>-0.0196 %<\/td>\n<td>2,475.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Perpetual-Discount<\/td>\n<td>5.20 %<\/td>\n<td>5.11 %<\/td>\n<td>110,801<\/td>\n<td>15.26<\/td>\n<td>15<\/td>\n<td>0.3683 %<\/td>\n<td>2,647.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>4.26 %<\/td>\n<td>3.58 %<\/td>\n<td>250,616<\/td>\n<td>16.57<\/td>\n<td>77<\/td>\n<td>0.2554 %<\/td>\n<td>2,519.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Deemed-Retractible<\/td>\n<td>4.98 %<\/td>\n<td>1.11 %<\/td>\n<td>99,552<\/td>\n<td>0.19<\/td>\n<td>40<\/td>\n<td>0.1252 %<\/td>\n<td>2,610.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FloatingReset<\/td>\n<td>2.56 %<\/td>\n<td>2.11 %<\/td>\n<td>63,285<\/td>\n<td>3.51<\/td>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td>-0.1417 %<\/td>\n<td>2,535.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<table border='1'>\n<tr>\n<td colspan='4'><strong>Performance Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Issue<\/td>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Change<\/td>\n<td>Notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ENB.PF.G<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>1.18 %<\/td>\n<td>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 22.74<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 23.99<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 4.23 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GWO.PR.H<\/td>\n<td>Deemed-Retractible<\/td>\n<td>1.25 %<\/td>\n<td>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Hard Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2025-01-31<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 25.00<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.28<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 5.23 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>TRP.PR.E<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>1.36 %<\/td>\n<td>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 23.30<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 25.40<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.63 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ENB.PF.E<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>1.41 %<\/td>\n<td>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 22.63<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 23.72<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 4.27 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PWF.PR.T<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>1.49 %<\/td>\n<td>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Call<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2019-01-31<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 25.00<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 25.83<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.49 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ENB.PR.Y<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>1.52 %<\/td>\n<td>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 21.71<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.08<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 4.27 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GWO.PR.N<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>1.53 %<\/td>\n<td>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Hard Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2025-01-31<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 25.00<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 19.95<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 5.33 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FTS.PR.H<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>1.58 %<\/td>\n<td>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 18.60<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 18.60<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.77 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PWF.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>Floater<\/td>\n<td>5.56 %<\/td>\n<td>Reasonably sort-of real. This reverses <a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=27219\">yesterday<\/a>&#8216;s loss, which was reasonably sort of real, but on trivial volume. Volume today was actually respectable, 5,776 shares, with the low for the day being 18.41 at the opening, with all subsequent trades near or above 19.00 &#8211; with a high of 19.98 for 500 shares late in the day.<br \/>\nYTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 19.00<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 19.00<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 2.78 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<table border='1'>\n<tr>\n<td colspan='4'><strong>Volume Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Issue<\/td>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Shares<br \/>Traded<\/td>\n<td>Notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>TD.PF.C<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>140,825<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=27181\">Recent new issue<\/a>.<br \/>\nYTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 23.07<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.76<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.53 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ENB.PR.Y<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>127,774<\/td>\n<td>Scotia crossed 100,000 at 21.98.<br \/>\nYTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 21.71<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.08<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 4.27 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ENB.PR.T<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>113,374<\/td>\n<td>Scotia crossed 100,000 at 22.40.<br \/>\nYTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 21.97<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.45<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 4.29 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SLF.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>Deemed-Retractible<\/td>\n<td>76,340<\/td>\n<td>Desjardins crossed 74,800 at 24.40.<br \/>\nYTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Hard Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2025-01-31<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 25.00<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.20<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 5.17 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>HSE.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>74,639<\/td>\n<td>RBC crossed 46,200 at 19.55.<br \/>\nYTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 19.66<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 19.66<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.99 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BMO.PR.S<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>63,578<\/td>\n<td>RBC crossed 50,000 at 25.53.<br \/>\nYTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 23.36<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 25.50<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.51 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan='4'>There were 34 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<table border='1'>\n<tr>\n<td colspan='3'><strong>Wide Spread Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Issue<\/td>\n<td>Index<\/td>\n<td>Quote Data and Yield Notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CGI.PR.D<\/td>\n<td>SplitShare<\/td>\n<td>Quote: 25.16 &#8211; 26.08<br \/>\nSpot Rate  :  0.9200<br \/>\nAverage  :  0.7739<\/p>\n<p>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Soft Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2023-06-14<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 25.00<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 25.16<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.69 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>IAG.PR.A<\/td>\n<td>Deemed-Retractible<\/td>\n<td>Quote: 23.41 &#8211; 23.99<br \/>\nSpot Rate  :  0.5800<br \/>\nAverage  :  0.4533<\/p>\n<p>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Hard Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2025-01-31<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 25.00<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 23.41<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 5.44 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>RY.PR.L<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>Quote: 26.02 &#8211; 26.34<br \/>\nSpot Rate  :  0.3200<br \/>\nAverage  :  0.2162<\/p>\n<p>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Call<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2019-02-24<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 25.00<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 26.02<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.30 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FTS.PR.G<\/td>\n<td>FixedReset<\/td>\n<td>Quote: 24.86 &#8211; 25.19<br \/>\nSpot Rate  :  0.3300<br \/>\nAverage  :  0.2354<\/p>\n<p>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 23.23<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.86<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.44 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BAM.PR.K<\/td>\n<td>Floater<\/td>\n<td>Quote: 16.55 &#8211; 16.95<br \/>\nSpot Rate  :  0.4000<br \/>\nAverage  :  0.3074<\/p>\n<p>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Limit Maturity<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2044-12-19<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 16.55<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 16.55<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.17 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NEW.PR.D<\/td>\n<td>SplitShare<\/td>\n<td>Quote: 32.17 &#8211; 33.09<br \/>\nSpot Rate  :  0.9200<br \/>\nAverage  :  0.8327<\/p>\n<p>YTW SCENARIO<br \/>\nMaturity Type   : Call<br \/>\nMaturity Date\t: 2015-06-26<br \/>\nMaturity Price  : 32.07<br \/>\nEvaluated at bid price : 32.17<br \/>\nBid-YTW : 3.46 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Canadian inflation was tamer than expected: Canada\u2019s inflation rate slowed more than economists forecast in November, returning to the central bank\u2019s target on a drop in gasoline prices. The consumer price index rose 2.0 percent &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-action"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}