{"id":27496,"date":"2015-01-15T20:36:00","date_gmt":"2015-01-16T01:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=27496"},"modified":"2015-01-15T20:36:00","modified_gmt":"2015-01-16T01:36:00","slug":"bbd-pr-b-bbd-pr-c-bbd-pr-d-downgraded-to-p-5high-by-sp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=27496","title":{"rendered":"BBD.PR.B, BBD.PR.C &amp; BBD.PR.D Downgraded to P-5(high) by S&amp;P"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bombardier announced a &#8216;pause&#8217; today <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2015-01-15\/bombardier-pauses-learjet-program-will-cut-about-1-000-jobs.html\">and the market paused its bids<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Bombardier Inc. (BBD\/B) tumbled the most in at least 26 years after moving to cut about 1,000 jobs and book $1.4 billion in pretax fourth-quarter costs as it halts work on the Learjet 85 business aircraft.<\/p>\n<p>The dismissals will take place in Kansas and Mexico, and result in severance expense of $25 million this quarter, said Bombardier, which didn\u2019t predict when the Learjet 85 program will resume. Profit in the aerospace and trainmaking units for 2014 will fall short of previously announced targets.<\/p>\n<p>Bombardier\u2019s pullback on the Learjet 85, which was described as a \u201cpause\u201d in the face of weak demand, underscored the company\u2019s struggle in developing new planes. The Learjet 85 is already more than a year behind schedule, and Montreal-based Bombardier eliminated about 3,500 aerospace jobs last year as it postponed the CSeries airliner for the fourth time.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s really not clear to me what \u2018pause\u2019 means,\u201d said Cam Doerksen, an analyst at National Bank of Canada Financial in Montreal who rates Bombardier as sector perform. \u201cThis is a pretty sizable charge, and this suggests to me this may be longer than a typical delay. This appears to be an indefinite pause.\u201d<br \/><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>The cost to protect Bombardier\u2019s debt from default within 5 years jumped 125 basis points to 481 basis points at 4:17 p.m., according to data provider CMA, which is owned by McGraw Hill Financial and compiles prices quoted by dealers in the privately negotiated market. The contracts are at the highest level since January 2012.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.standardandpoors.com\/prot\/ratings\/articles\/en\/us?articleType=HTML&#038;assetID=1245379900019\">S&#038;P cut their credit rating by a notch<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li>\u2022Montreal-based Bombardier Inc. announced it would pause its Learjet 85 program due to weak demand and has revised its business aircraft market forecast downward.\n<li>\u2022In addition, the company revised its 2014 guidance, including reduced earnings before interest and taxes margins at both the aerospace and<br \/>\ntransportation divisions.<\/p>\n<li>\u2022Because of Bombardier&#8217;s reduced profitability, pricing pressures on new aircraft, and revised escalation assumptions in the transportation division on some contracts that affected estimated future revenues, we<br \/>\nhave reassessed our comparable rating modifier on the company and revised it to &#8220;neutral&#8221; from &#8220;positive&#8221;.<\/p>\n<li>\u2022As a result, we are lowering our ratings on Bombardier, including our long-term corporate credit rating to &#8216;B+&#8217; from &#8216;BB-&#8216;\n<li>\u2022The negative outlook reflects our view that Bombardier&#8217;s 2015 performance could remain challenged due to market conditions and the company&#8217;s continued large capital spend program, leading to weaker credit protection measures than previously forecast.<\/ul>\n<p><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>The ratings on Bombardier reflect what we view as the company&#8217;s &#8220;satisfactory&#8221; business risk profile and &#8220;highly leveraged&#8221; financial risk profile. Our ratings take into consideration the company&#8217;s leading market positions in the transportation and business aircraft segments, as well as its product range and diversity. These positive factors are partially offset, in our opinion, by the continued execution risk associated with the entry into service of the CSeries jet, high leverage, and reported profitability that has been weak in both the aerospace and transportation divisions.<br \/><b>&#8230;<\/b><br \/>The negative outlook reflects our view that Bombardier&#8217;s 2015 performance could remain challenged due to market conditions and the company&#8217;s continued large capital spend program, leading to weaker credit protection measures than we previously forecast. Furthermore, the outlook incorporates our opinion that, given Bombardier&#8217;s current leverage and debt-to-cash flow metrics, there remains very limited room for delays on project execution or margin<br \/>\ndeterioration.<\/p>\n<p>We could lower the rating on Bombardier should its new aircraft program experience further delays or order levels do not allow for profitable production, resulting in a reassessment of the company&#8217;s business risk profile. In addition, we could take a negative rating action should Bombardier face liquidity pressures, which could result from either deteriorating headroom under its covenants or an inability to refinance upcoming maturities. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>These issues have previously been <a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=24445\">downgraded to P-4(low) by S&#038;P in February 2014<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=23608\">to Pfd-4(low) by DBRS<\/a>. All are tracked by HIMIPref&trade; and all are relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update, 2015-1-26<\/b>: Moody&#8217;s has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.moodys.com\/research\/Moodys-reviews-Bombardiers-Ba3-ratings-for-possible-downgrade-lowers-liquidity--PR_316568\">placed Bombardier under Review-Negative<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Moody&#8217;s Investors Service placed Bombardier Inc.&#8217;s Ba3 Corporate Family rating (CFR), Ba3-PD probability of default rating and Ba3 senior unsecured ratings under review for possible downgrade. Moody&#8217;s also lowered the company&#8217;s speculative grade liquidity rating to SGL-3 from SGL-2.<\/p>\n<p>The rating&#8217;s review follows Bombardier&#8217;s announcement yesterday that it has materially lowered its earnings and cash flow expectations for 2014. Consequently, Moody&#8217;s believes Bombardier will need to raise additional debt to fund the cash shortfall and address its weakened liquidity position, which would further pressure the company&#8217;s adjusted leverage from an already high level of approximately 7x currently. As well, given ongoing execution challenges in its Transportation division, relatively weak order flow for certain of its aircraft, and the potential for further cost escalation related to its CSeries aircraft program, Moody&#8217;s believes the company will continue to consume cash through at least 2015. Bombardier&#8217;s $2.4 billion of cash and $1.4 billion of available revolvers provides adequate liquidity, however continued covenant compliance through the next year is a concern in Moody&#8217;s opinion.<\/p>\n<p>Moody&#8217;s review will focus on Bombardier&#8217;s plans to strengthen its liquidity position, as well as the company&#8217;s prospects for improving its earnings and reducing its cash consumptiveness through 2016.<\/p>\n<p>Bombardier&#8217;s unsecured notes, which do not benefit from upstream guarantees, could be lowered by more than the CFR, particularly if the company obtains secured debt with any funding initiatives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombardier announced a &#8216;pause&#8217; today and the market paused its bids: Bombardier Inc. (BBD\/B) tumbled the most in at least 26 years after moving to cut about 1,000 jobs and book $1.4 billion in pretax &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issue-comments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27496","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27496"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27496\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}