{"id":2872,"date":"2008-09-08T12:31:24","date_gmt":"2008-09-08T16:31:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=2872"},"modified":"2008-09-08T12:31:24","modified_gmt":"2008-09-08T16:31:24","slug":"critchley-sounds-cautionary-note-on-fixed-resets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=2872","title":{"rendered":"Critchley Sounds Cautionary Note on Fixed-Resets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As noted by Assiduous Reader <i>Tobyone<\/i> in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=2830#comment-38703\">comments to a prior post<\/a>, Barry Critchley of the Financial Post has published a column with a cautionary note regarding this structure: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.financialpost.com\/analysis\/columnists\/story.html?id=00c37c14-8cc6-451d-af69-b1a031fdf541\">Banks Big on Reset Preferred Shares<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Over the past six months, five of the chartered banks &#8212; the Big Six less the Royal Bank&#8211;have raised more than $2-billion by way of reset preferred shares, a security they hadn&#8217;t previously sold to the public.<\/p>\n<p>But the security has been around for a long time, given that BCE, for example, issued a pile of them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=2870\">Royal Bank announced a new issue today<\/a> just to ruin his column.<\/p>\n<p>However, it is not strictly correct that BCE issued a pile of them. The BCE issues were reset at a proportion of five year Canadas determined by the board; the floating-rate side were ratchet-rate preferreds that could (and currently are) paying 100% of prime.<\/p>\n<p>Critchley notes the inflation-mitigating effect of this structure:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In a high-inflation world, that new feature allows investors to be offered market-type rates. That feature is better than what existed with the fixed-rate perpetuals where there was no ability in a high-inflation world for investors to receive market rates.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I noted the inflation-mitigating effect of this structure in the previous post on this topic, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=2830\">Harry Koza Likes Fixed-Resets<\/a>. Naturally, I will grant &#8220;that feature is better&#8221;. Of course it is. What else am I gonna say? The question is not whether the feature is good or not, but how good is it and how much are we paying for it?<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Critchley continues:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Investors giving up yield compared with buying a fixed-rate non-reset pref share: &#8220;In essence, you are paying a premium (in terms of a lower current yield) in exchange for inflation protection down the road that won&#8217;t likely materialize unless it is clearly in favour of the issuer,&#8221; he noted. &#8220;The only thing you know for sure is that you are taking long-term credit risk with a very uncertain compensation that is currently well below fixed-rate issues.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Exactly my point.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update, 2008-9-9<\/b>: The source for the quotations in the column was the screen-name <i>scomac<\/i>, writing in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.financialwebring.org\/forum\/viewtopic.php?t=108311&#038;start=0&#038;postdays=0&#038;postorder=asc&#038;highlight=\">Financial WebRing Forum<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As noted by Assiduous Reader Tobyone in the comments to a prior post, Barry Critchley of the Financial Post has published a column with a cautionary note regarding this structure: Banks Big on Reset Preferred &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2872","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-miscellaneous-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2872","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2872"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2872\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2872"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2872"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2872"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}