{"id":368,"date":"2006-12-06T22:43:31","date_gmt":"2006-12-07T02:43:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=368"},"modified":"2006-12-06T22:43:31","modified_gmt":"2006-12-07T02:43:31","slug":"strange-strength-in-sxtpra","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=368","title":{"rendered":"Strange Strength in SXT.PR.A"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What&#8217;s up with this issue? It&#8217;s not in the HIMI Preferred Indices (at the moment, anyway) due to volume considerations, but today it traded 41,832 shares and closed at 25.90-95, 78&#215;20. AND <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnxmarketlink.com\/en\/releases\/archive\/October2006\/24\/c3881.html\">it went ex-dividend today<\/a>. Maybe to you and me, that means the price should go down, but not this time!<\/p>\n<p>What makes this strange is that the pre-tax YTW on this issue is now -4.66% [that&#8217;s NEGATIVE 4.66% if the word-wrap on your browser is misbehaving!], based on the bid of $25.90 and a redemption call 2007-4-14 at $25.00. If it lasts until its scheduled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefshares.com\/glossary.html#hardMaturity\">hardMaturity<\/a> 2011-3-15, then it will have yielded +4.76%, but just how likely is this contingency, anyway?<\/p>\n<p>When we look at the financials, available via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotiamanagedcompanies.com\/mcapp\/home.do\">Scotia Managed Companies<\/a>, we find the following history of units outstanding:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"1\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\">SXT.PR.A Units Outstanding<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Date<\/td>\n<td>Units<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Issue, 2001-3-12<\/td>\n<td>7,500,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2003<\/td>\n<td>-107,540<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2004<\/td>\n<td>-492,059<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2005<\/td>\n<td>-2,161,719<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2006<\/td>\n<td>-3,202,804<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Remaining<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>1,535,878<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Which in the first place goes a long way towards explaining why the issue no longer qualifies for index inclusion on volume considerations and in the second place demonstrates that the capital unit holders aren&#8217;t exactly shy about redeeming units. Scotia says that the SXT Capital Units had a NAVPS of $19.61 as of December 5 &#8230; the market didn&#8217;t do much today, so say that&#8217;s constant &#8230; SXT closed at $19.23-84, 40&#215;50.<\/p>\n<p>There will always be those who disagree, of course, but it seems to me that the increase in the Capital Units&#8217; intrinsic value from about $17 last March to the current figure, together with the fact that the Capital Units were trading at a discount to intrinsic value of about 7-8% immediately following the last redemption, that has now been reduced to about 2%, makes the probability of redemption extremely high. Scotia has a great little feature on their <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotiamanagedcompanies.com\/mcapp\/historicalnav.do\">website<\/a> whereby a user can plot the intrinsic value and the market value and the discount over time. Have a look. Same pattern: discount goes to about 8% following the redemption period, increases gradually to about the current figure, then there&#8217;s a whacking great redemption.<\/p>\n<p>Given that, I wouldn&#8217;t be paying $25.90 for these shares!<\/p>\n<p>As I&#8217;ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=367\">said before<\/a>, the world would be a better place if more split share corporations&#8217; preferred shares had some degree of call protection via premia on early-call prices.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve attached two graphs of data over the past year: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/12\/SXTPRAFBP.pdf\">Flat Bid Price<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/12\/SXTPRAYTW.pdf\">Yield-to-Worst<\/a>. Check the glossary for explanations of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefshares.com\/glossary.html#flatBidPrice\">flatBidPrice<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefshares.com\/glossary.html#yieldToWorst\">yieldToWorst<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n<p><!--2e35cdcdff8a2ace1fee98747cc31745--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What&#8217;s up with this issue? It&#8217;s not in the HIMI Preferred Indices (at the moment, anyway) due to volume considerations, but today it traded 41,832 shares and closed at 25.90-95, 78&#215;20. AND it went ex-dividend &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issue-comments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}