{"id":4057,"date":"2008-11-19T13:36:23","date_gmt":"2008-11-19T17:36:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=4057"},"modified":"2008-11-19T13:36:23","modified_gmt":"2008-11-19T17:36:23","slug":"ffnpra-dividends-on-capital-units-suspended","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=4057","title":{"rendered":"FFN.PR.A : Dividends on Capital Units Suspended"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Financial 15 Split Corp. II <a href=\"http:\/\/www.marketwire.com\/press-release\/Financial-15-Split-Corp-Ii-TSX-FFN-922402.html\">has announced<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>its regular monthly distribution of $0.04375 for each Preferred share ($0.525 annually). Distributions are payable December 10, 2008 to shareholders on record as at November 28, 2008. There will not be a distribution paid to Financial 15 II Class A Shares for November 28, 2008 as per the Prospectus which states no regular monthly dividends or other distributions will be paid on the Class A Shares in any month as long as the net asset value per unit is equal to or less than $15.00. The Net Asset Value as of November 14, 2008 was $14.06.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>FFN.PR.A was last mentioned on PrefBlog when <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=3508\">it implored unitholders NOT TO PANIC!!!!<\/a>. There was a query regarding possible suspension of dividends on this thread; I concurred with the querant&#8217;s suggestion; both comments were posted *ahem* after the time-stamp of the press release. Well, it still hasn&#8217;t been posted on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.financial15.com\">the fund&#8217;s website<\/a> as of noon, that&#8217;s all I can say!<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.financial15.com\/pdf\/advisors\/f15_split_ll\/FINAL-Prospectus-FTN-II.pdf\">monthly retraction feature for FFN.PR.A<\/a> is supportive:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Holders retracting a Preferred Share will be entitled to receive an amount per Preferred Share equal to the lesser of (a) $10.00 and (b) 96% of the Net Asset Value per Unit determined as of the Retraction Date less the cost to the Company of the purchase of a Class A Share in the market for cancellation and less any related commissions and other costs (to a maximum of 1% of the Net Asset Value per Unit). Payment for any shares so retracted will be made within 15 days of the Retraction Date.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>NAV on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.financial15.com\/Split_ll\/valuations.html\">November 14 was $14.06<\/a>. The capital units closed that day at $7.01; the preferreds closed at $7.00. Support was only mild as of that day&#8217;s prices (what on earth were the capital units doing, trading at a 75% premium to their NAV?) but today looks much better.<\/p>\n<p>As I write this, FFN is quoted at 4.75-99 (still way above NAV!) and FFN.PR.A is quoted at $6.06-24. Using XFN as a proxy (not a particularly good proxy, since it&#8217;s all Canadian, and FFN is 1\/3 American) &#8230; it closed at $18.60 on the 14th and is now trading at $17.12. That&#8217;s a loss on XFN of 8% in the period, so estimate the current NAV of FFN + FFN.PR.A units at $14.06 * 0.92 = 12.93.<\/p>\n<p>Estimated Retraction Price:<br \/>\nR = 96% (NAV &#8211; C)<br \/>\nR = 96% (12.93 &#8211; 4.93)  &#8230;. [cheating on the price a little bit!]<br \/>\nR = 96% (8.00)<br \/>\nR = $7.68.<\/p>\n<p>So even with grossly over-valued capital units (although option players might have something to say about the value of the capital unitholders&#8217; options) the monthly retraction is now looking extremely profitable.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update, 2008-11-20<\/b>: I have received the following communication from a very nervous Assiduous Reader:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I noticed your post on prefblog.com yesterday about FFN.PR.A. With coverage of the preferreds at 1.4:1 now and with today&#8217;s sharp declines in the price of Canadian financials, which make up the bulk of FFN&#8217;s assets, isn&#8217;t there a danger that it won&#8217;t pay dividends on the preferreds next month? Wouldn&#8217;t that also lead to a downward revision of<br \/>\nthe NAV for the next monthly retraction?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Asset coverage of 1.4:1 is a lot. Maybe not when considering the long term, and maybe not when the underlying security is Consolidated Internet Mines &#038; Telecom, Inc., but when the time scale is a matter of days and the underlying is blue-chip (well &#8230; as blue as they get, nowadays!) financials, it&#8217;s a lot. Asset coverage of 1.4:1 means the the underlying has to drop by 1 &#8211; (1\/1.4) = 29% before the preferred shareholders become exposed to loss &#8230; and remember, that&#8217;s EXPOSED to loss, I&#8217;m talking about! At that point (asset coverage of 1:1), they basically own the portfolio of underlying equities.<\/p>\n<p>My XFN proxy is now trading at 15.66, down a lot from the 17.12 I used above. That&#8217;s a loss of<br \/>\nabout 8.5%, so estimate the current NAV of FFN + FFN.PR.A units at $12.93 * 0.915 = 11.83. This is incredible. Look at the 10-day chart:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/xfn_ffn_10d1.jpg\"><\/div>\n<p>This is epic. I pointed out the epic nature of this crash on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prefblog.com\/?p=3709\">October 31<\/a> and now it&#8217;s even &#8230; um &#8230; more epic.<\/p>\n<p>And you STILL have asset coverage of just under 1.2:1; the underlying can STILL go down ANOTHER 15%-odd; the capital unit-holders can lose even more money &#8211; before the preferred shareholders even have direct exposure. They haven&#8217;t lost anything at that point, not even on paper; but it takes all this before they can even become exposed.<\/p>\n<p>So while the cushion is being eroded, there&#8217;s still a cushion.<\/p>\n<p>As far as the preferred share dividends are concerned &#8230; well, the company can suspend them any time they like. That would be an enormous step and I consider it highly unlikely. Now that the capital unit dividends have been suspended, the company is cash-flow positive after expenses and dividends (assuming constancy of incoming dividends) and their assets are easy to sell if they need some money. I can remember only one case in which a split-shares&#8217; preferred dividends were suspended &#8230; that was GT.PR.A a few years back. I suspect that they wanted to suspend dividends to the capital units when their NAV got low, but there was no mechanism in the prospectus regarding an NAV test &#8211; so they left one single dividend on the preferreds unpaid, restarted preferred payments and left capital units hanging out to dry &#8230; because capital unitholders, under the terms of GT.PR.A&#8217;s prospectus, could not receive dividends if the company was in default to the preferreds.<\/p>\n<p>Your concerns about a dividend cut on the preferreds are &#8230; well, nothing&#8217;s impossible, but the probability is miniscule. And anyway, the dividends are cumulative. On windup of the company, the preferred shareholders would get their $10 principal and all unpaid dividends before the capital unitholders saw a single penny.<\/p>\n<p>However, non-payment of preferred dividends would have no effect on NAV. The cash would remain in the company, but so would a liability for unpaid dividends. There could well be an effect on market price, however!<\/p>\n<p>You seem extremely worried about the FFN.PR.A position you hold. Although your worries seem overblown to me, it&#8217;s your money, not mine! You may wish to consider reducing your position to the point where you can sleep again &#8230; but I earnestly suggest that if you do reduce, you give consideration to retraction rather than market sale, because selling into this market is a highly unpleasant experience.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Financial 15 Split Corp. II has announced: its regular monthly distribution of $0.04375 for each Preferred share ($0.525 annually). Distributions are payable December 10, 2008 to shareholders on record as at November 28, 2008. There &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issue-comments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4057"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4057\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}