{"id":48671,"date":"2017-08-03T22:11:00","date_gmt":"2017-08-04T02:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=48671"},"modified":"2025-07-23T22:13:23","modified_gmt":"2025-07-24T02:13:23","slug":"august-3-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=48671","title":{"rendered":"August 3, 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

Remember the Teachers \/ BCE deal<\/a>? Bloomberg has a look back, ten years later<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Another is what happened to BCE after the deal imploded. It flourished\u2014with what Jim Leech, head of Ontario Teachers\u2019 Pension Plan\u2019s private capital arm at the time, says is much of the board and management team his bidding group would have put in charge. <\/p>\n

Today the company\u2019s shares are up more than 150 percent from the day the deal collapsed.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt would have been a home run,\u201d Mark Wiseman, then head of private investment at the competing bidder Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, says. \u201cIt didn\u2019t beat what we projected\u2014it crushed what we projected.\u201d
…<\/b>
Wiseman:Hindsight is 20-20. As it turns out, the company could have easily supported the debt, given its outperformance. What\u2019s missed in the middle of this is that [KPMG\u2019s] Susan Glass helped save Citibank. If she had gone the other way on her going-concern opinion, Citi would have been on the hook for at least C$20 billion in the middle of the financial crisis. Could you imagine the loss they would have taken in trying to place that debt?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Joel Wagner of the BoC has published a Staff Paper, Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity in Canada: Evidence Against a \u201cGreasing Effect\u201d<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

The existence of downward nominal wage rigidity (DNWR) has often been used to justify a positive inflation target. It is traditionally assumed that positive inflation could \u201cgrease the wheels\u201d of the labour market by putting downward pressure on real wages, easing labour market adjustments during a recession. A rise in the inflation target would attenuate the long-run level of unemployment and hasten economic recovery after an adverse shock. Following Daly and Hobijn (2014), we re-examine these issues in a model that accounts for precautionary motives in wage-setting behaviour. We confirm that DNWR generates a long-run negative relation between inflation and unemployment, in line with previous contributions to the literature. However, we also find that the increase in the number of people bound by DNWR following a negative demand shock rises with inflation, offsetting the beneficial effects of a higher inflation target. As an implication, contrary to previous contributions that neglected precautionary behaviour, the speed at which unemployment returns to pre-crisis levels during recessions is relatively unaffected by variations in the inflation target.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Global bonds were strong today<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

\u2022The yield on 10-year Treasuries held at 2.22 percent after declining five basis points on Thursday.
\n\u2022Ten-year yield on Australian government notes fell five basis points to 2.62 percent<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Canada was not immune, with the five-year Canada yield<\/a> falling to 1.51%, from 1.65% at month-end.<\/p>\n

Americans are doing better with their retirement plans<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

A string of record 401(k) and IRA account totals now stretches across three consecutive quarters, according to second-quarter data from Fidelity Investments. The data covers 22,155 companies and 15.1 million 401(k) plan participants, as well as 8.8 million IRA accounts. The performance reflects the impressive display of endurance training by a stock market that just keeps on running, as well as increased employee and employer contributions to retirement accounts. <\/p>\n

The average 401(k) account balance stands at $97,700 as of June 30. That\u2019s a 9.6 percent gain from the $89,100 average of a year ago, and a big leap from the $73,300 average of five years ago. Average IRA totals, meanwhile, rose to $100,200 from $89,600 a year ago and $73,100 in 2012. For the 12 months ending June 30, market gains accounted for 72 percent of the rise in retirement account balances at Fidelity. Over that same period, the Standard & Poor\u2019s 500 had a total return of 17.9 percent.
…<\/b>
Employees put a record average of $5,850 into their 401(k)s over the past 12 months, a 4 percent increase from a year ago. Ninety-five percent of active employees contribute to their 401(k)s, and many defer enough of their pre-tax salary to get the average company match, which is 4.5 percent. But about 21 percent of employees can\u2019t, or aren\u2019t, contributing enough to get the full match. Many are likely to have been auto-enrolled into their 401(k) at a salary deferral rate of 3 percent, and left it there.<\/p>\n

The bit of good news is that many savers don\u2019t have that far to go before getting the full match\u201453 percent are 1 or 2 percentage points away. Competing financial priorities may mean saving another 1 or 2 percent of salary isn\u2019t feasible until a raise or bonus comes into play. But if extra cash flow exists, a relatively small increase in savings rates can make a big difference over a long career.\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices<\/strong>
Values are provisional and are finalized monthly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Index<\/td>\nMean
Current
Yield
(at bid)<\/td>\n		Median
YTW<\/td>\n		Median
Average
Trading
Value<\/td>\n		Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)<\/td>\n		Issues<\/td>\nDay’s Perf.<\/td>\nIndex Value<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ratchet<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.00<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n-0.0457 %<\/td>\n2,443.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FixedFloater<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.00<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n-0.0457 %<\/td>\n4,484.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Floater<\/td>\n3.54 %<\/td>\n3.56 %<\/td>\n128,595<\/td>\n18.36<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n-0.0457 %<\/td>\n2,584.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OpRet<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.00<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n-0.1332 %<\/td>\n3,058.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SplitShare<\/td>\n4.71 %<\/td>\n4.39 %<\/td>\n55,285<\/td>\n1.38<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n-0.1332 %<\/td>\n3,652.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Interest-Bearing<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0.00 %<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.00<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n-0.1332 %<\/td>\n2,849.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Perpetual-Premium<\/td>\n5.39 %<\/td>\n4.61 %<\/td>\n61,671<\/td>\n5.96<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n0.0232 %<\/td>\n2,785.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Perpetual-Discount<\/td>\n5.30 %<\/td>\n5.29 %<\/td>\n69,270<\/td>\n14.90<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n-0.3245 %<\/td>\n2,923.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FixedReset<\/td>\n4.33 %<\/td>\n4.43 %<\/td>\n168,840<\/td>\n6.33<\/td>\n98<\/td>\n-0.1546 %<\/td>\n2,409.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deemed-Retractible<\/td>\n5.06 %<\/td>\n5.38 %<\/td>\n110,816<\/td>\n6.10<\/td>\n30<\/td>\n0.0055 %<\/td>\n2,866.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FloatingReset<\/td>\n2.60 %<\/td>\n2.96 %<\/td>\n41,804<\/td>\n4.25<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n-0.0809 %<\/td>\n2,638.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Performance Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Issue<\/td>\nIndex<\/td>\nChange<\/td>\nNotes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
VNR.PR.A<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n-1.57 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 21.56
\nEvaluated at bid price : 21.90
\nBid-YTW : 5.12 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
IFC.PR.C<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n-1.21 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Hard Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2025-01-31
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.13
\nBid-YTW : 5.72 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MFC.PR.J<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n-1.20 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Hard Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2025-01-31
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 23.81
\nBid-YTW : 5.12 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BAM.PF.G<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n-1.15 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 22.99
\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.00
\nBid-YTW : 4.67 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BAM.PF.D<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n-1.15 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 22.14
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.40
\nBid-YTW : 5.53 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NA.PR.W<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n-1.14 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 21.38
\nEvaluated at bid price : 21.70
\nBid-YTW : 4.49 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BAM.PR.N<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n-1.10 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 21.51
\nEvaluated at bid price : 21.51
\nBid-YTW : 5.59 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BAM.PF.C<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\n-1.03 %<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 21.67
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.02
\nBid-YTW : 5.56 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Volume Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Issue<\/td>\nIndex<\/td>\nShares
Traded<\/td>\n		Notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TRP.PR.J<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n152,492<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Call
\nMaturity Date\t: 2021-05-31
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 26.94
\nBid-YTW : 3.60 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MFC.PR.R<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n66,124<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Call
\nMaturity Date\t: 2022-03-19
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 25.89
\nBid-YTW : 4.16 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RY.PR.Q<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n56,500<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Call
\nMaturity Date\t: 2021-05-24
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 26.65
\nBid-YTW : 3.56 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TRP.PR.D<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n39,480<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 22.30
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.64
\nBid-YTW : 4.45 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RY.PR.J<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n29,009<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 22.92
\nEvaluated at bid price : 23.82
\nBid-YTW : 4.43 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CM.PR.R<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\n28,534<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Call
\nMaturity Date\t: 2022-07-31
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 25.10
\nBid-YTW : 4.51 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
There were 12 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Wide Spread Highlights<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Issue<\/td>\nIndex<\/td>\nQuote Data and Yield Notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
VNR.PR.A<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\nQuote: 21.90 – 22.45
\nSpot Rate : 0.5500
\nAverage : 0.3714<\/p>\n

YTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 21.56
\nEvaluated at bid price : 21.90
\nBid-YTW : 5.12 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

IFC.PR.C<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\nQuote: 22.13 – 22.69
\nSpot Rate : 0.5600
\nAverage : 0.4010<\/p>\n

YTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Hard Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2025-01-31
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 22.13
\nBid-YTW : 5.72 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

GWO.PR.I<\/td>\nDeemed-Retractible<\/td>\nQuote: 21.91 – 22.28
\nSpot Rate : 0.3700
\nAverage : 0.2422<\/p>\n

YTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Hard Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2025-01-31
\nMaturity Price : 25.00
\nEvaluated at bid price : 21.91
\nBid-YTW : 6.74 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

NA.PR.W<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\nQuote: 21.70 – 22.05
\nSpot Rate : 0.3500
\nAverage : 0.2268<\/p>\n

YTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 21.38
\nEvaluated at bid price : 21.70
\nBid-YTW : 4.49 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

BAM.PF.G<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\nQuote: 24.00 – 24.29
\nSpot Rate : 0.2900
\nAverage : 0.1825<\/p>\n

YTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 22.99
\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.00
\nBid-YTW : 4.67 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

PWF.PR.F<\/td>\nPerpetual-Discount<\/td>\nQuote: 24.63 – 24.88
\nSpot Rate : 0.2500
\nAverage : 0.1560<\/p>\n

YTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2047-08-03
\nMaturity Price : 24.32
\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.63
\nBid-YTW : 5.35 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Remember the Teachers \/ BCE deal? Bloomberg has a look back, ten years later: Another is what happened to BCE after the deal imploded. It flourished\u2014with what Jim Leech, head of Ontario Teachers\u2019 Pension Plan\u2019s …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-action"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=48671"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48671\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48672,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48671\/revisions\/48672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=48671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=48671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=48671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}