{"id":49435,"date":"2018-06-03T20:54:00","date_gmt":"2018-06-04T00:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=49435"},"modified":"2025-08-15T20:56:28","modified_gmt":"2025-08-16T00:56:28","slug":"ema-pr-h-holds-its-own-on-excellent-volume","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/?p=49435","title":{"rendered":"EMA.PR.H Holds Its Own on Excellent Volume"},"content":{"rendered":"

Emera Incorporated has announced<\/a> (on May 31):<\/p>\n

that it has completed its bought deal offering of 12,000,000 Cumulative Minimum Rate Reset First Preferred Shares, Series H at a price of $25.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $300 million. The syndicate of underwriters was led by Scotiabank, CIBC Capital Markets, RBC Capital Markets and TD Securities Inc., as joint bookrunners, and also included BMO Capital Markets, National Bank Financial Inc., Industrial Alliance Securities Inc. and Raymond James Ltd. The net proceeds of the offering will be used for general corporate purposes.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

EMA.PR.H is a FixedReset, 4.90%+254M490, announced May 17<\/a>. It will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and has been assigned to the FixedReset subindex.<\/p>\n

The issue traded 1,345,583 shares on its May 31 opening day in a range of 24.65-95 before closing at 24.88-92. Vital Statistics are:<\/p>\n

\n\n\n
EMA.PR.H<\/td>\nFixedReset<\/td>\nYTW SCENARIO
\nMaturity Type : Limit Maturity
\nMaturity Date\t: 2048-05-31
\nMaturity Price : 23.11
\nEvaluated at bid price : 24.88
\nBid-YTW : 4.85 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

The new issue is somewhat expensive according to Implied Volatility Analysis<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"impvol_ema_180531\"<\/a>
Click for Big<\/i><\/div>\n

According to the analysis above, the fair value is $24.50 … note, however, that complainers will triumphantly point out that this assigns a value of zero to the Floor Rate Guarantee. But as I stated in the February, 2018, edition of PrefLetter<\/a>:<\/p>\n

It is often asserted that a horrific fall of FixedReset prices is a completely logical expectation; that the 2014-16 bear market was completely justified; that similar experiences will happen again; and that floor rates are an excellent way to protect investors from the decline in income.<\/p>\n

This assertion does not make a lot of sense to me. Suppose an investor holds a FixedReset with a coupon rate of 5% and that a decline in government yields makes a reduction to 4% seem both likely and imminent. If the bear market scenario is to play out, this investor and many like him will be selling to avoid experiencing the reset.<\/p>\n

But where is this money to be deployed? Yields are already down in the government market and all other fixed income markets will be affected to some degree; corporate-government spreads increased during the recent episode (see Chart FR-63 ), but corporate yields did decline \u2013 they just didn\u2019t decline as much. I see no reason for an expectation that FixedReset yields should magically remain constant if the face of global interest rate declines.
…<\/b>
However, any increase in the price of the floor-rate issue is capped by the call price. In the simplest scenario, the non-floor issue will remain priced at par and reset to a 4% distribution, while the floored issue will be called; the investor will then have to reinvest his funds \u2026 and find that he is reinvesting at contemporary rates and experiencing transaction costs that are not borne by the investor in the non-floored issue. It\u2019s not much of a win!<\/p>\n

In order for the floor rate to have value, both issues must be trading at a discount to par; this will give the floored issue room to rise in price on the secondary market. Such a price rise will be determined by the excess yield to be gained over the next five years until the next reset plus, perhaps, an allowance for the possibility that current conditions will persist and give the holder another chance to reset. The benefit will be capped by the distribution rate difference multiplied by the Modified Duration of the issues (which will normally be in the range of 20 to 25), so a price difference of between 20% and 25% for a one percent decline in government yields. However, this potential gain is capped by the potential for a call, so the issues must already be trading at a 20%-25% discount to par for this maximum to be reached \u2026 and to work out the value of this scenario, we must then calculate the probability of such a decline in government yields.<\/p>\n

Once we see floor-rate issues trading at large discounts in an environment in which a significant decline in government rates has a reasonable probability, I will revisit my opinion of the value of such guarantees. I\u2019m not holding my breath.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Now, against the above we have actual empirical data regarding the prices of the EMA FixedResets since the announcement date:<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n
Issue<\/td>\nIssue
Reset
Spread<\/td>\n		Total Return
5\/17 – 5\/31<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
EMA.PR.A<\/td>\n184<\/td>\n+0.05%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
EMA.PR.C<\/td>\n265<\/td>\n-2.76%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
EMA.PR.F<\/td>\n263<\/td>\n-2.33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

This has accompanied the fall in the GOC-5 yield from 2.33% on May 17 to 2.10% on May 31 (which, proponents will gleefully point out, has made the floor rate on the new issue a matter of great interest). For now, the situation remains murky.<\/p>\n

However, even those unimpressed by all that “Implied Volatility” blather and tiresome pettifogging regarding Floor Guarantees should be, at the very least, tempted by EMA.PR.A in preference to the new issue. Sure, it only pays 2.555% at present<\/a> … but it will reset on 2020-8-15 at GOC-5 + 184, or – given the May 31 GOC-5 yield of 2.10% – 3.94%. It was quoted May 31 at 19.10-31, an Expected Future Current Yield of 5.16%, which ain’t bad for investment grade!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Emera Incorporated has announced (on May 31): that it has completed its bought deal offering of 12,000,000 Cumulative Minimum Rate Reset First Preferred Shares, Series H at a price of $25.00 per share for aggregate …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issue-comments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=49435"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49436,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49435\/revisions\/49436"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=49435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=49435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prefblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=49435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}