Archive for September, 2008

September, 2008, PrefLetter Released

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

The September, 2008, edition of PrefLetter has been released and is now available for purchase as the “Previous edition”.

Until further notice, the “Previous Edition” will refer to the September, 2008, issue, while the “Next Edition” will be the October, 2008, issue, scheduled to be prepared as of the close October 10 and eMailed to subscribers prior to market-opening on October 14 (October 13 is Thanksgiving).

PrefLetter is intended for long term investors seeking issues to buy-and-hold. At least one recommendation from each of the major preferred share sectors is included and discussed.

The winner of the Win a PrefLetter Contest was Assiduous Reader adrian2, who must have done all kinds of work to dig up an old post regarding BMO.PR.G. I will review the situation regarding ACO.PR.A in the near future. Congratulations adrian2!

Note: PrefLetter, being delivered to clients as a large attachment by eMail, sometimes runs afoul of spam filters. If you have not received your copy within fifteen minutes of a release notice such as this one, please double check your (company’s) spam filtering policy and your spam repository. If it’s not there, contact me and I’ll get you your copy … somehow!

September 12, 2008

Friday, September 12th, 2008

Treasury has released FAQs regarding the FNM/FRE Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.

Naked Capitalism reprints an article in the Financial Times claiming that a consortium including BofA is looking at Lehman. Who knows? We could be having yet another Sunday Special!

Moody’s has cut Washington Mutual’s senior unsecured rating to junk:

Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the long-term deposit and issuer ratings of Washington Mutual Bank to Baa3 from Baa2. The bank’s financial strength rating was downgraded to D+ from C-, base line credit assessment (BCA) to Ba1 from Baa2, and short term rating to Prime-3 from Prime-2. Washington Mutual Inc.’s senior unsecured rating was downgraded to Ba2 from Baa3. The rating action concludes the review that was initiated on July 22, 2008. The outlook is negative.

Moody’s also expects WaMu to report future quarters of large losses. This could exacerbate negative market sentiment and lead to franchise impairment.

Washington Mutual Inc.’s preferred stock was downgraded to B2 from Ba2, reflecting Moody’s view that the risk of a suspension of dividends on these instruments has risen materially.

The Auction Rate Securities shakedown in the States continues, with Fidelity close to a $300-million buy-back:

Fidelity Investments is close to a settlement with New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo to buy back $300 million in auction-rate securities, according to a person familiar with the negotiations.

If there was misrepresentation of the product, or if clients were given grossly unsuitable advice, then somebody should be losing their license. After public hearings. If there was no such fraudulent misrepresentation, if the only problem was that investments didn’t work out as hoped, then nobody should be doing anything. Attorney General Andrew Cuomo would be well advised to look back at his schoolbooks, under “Rule of Law”. This whole business of negotiated settlements in regulatory matters is an affront to civilized values.

Hard on the heels of my speculation yesterday that the BoE was preparing the ground for a more punitive rate for its liquidity operations comes the news that the Fed’s discount window is working overtime:

Borrowing from the Fed’s discount window hit record levels in six of the past eight weeks, and reached $23.5 billion as of Sept. 10, Fed data show. By comparison, lending averaged just $779 million a week in the three months after New York Fed President Timothy Geithner urged banks to use the program.

The increasing use of the funds risks delaying banks’ disposal of nonperforming assets and capital raising. It also may make it tough to restore the rate on the loans to the historical 1 percentage point premium over overnight funds, analysts said. The Fed has lowered the rate nine times since August 2007.

The data comes from the Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.4.1. Bloomberg has a neat graph:

Nine times in twelve months! There is even some speculation that that the next move move might be a loosening:

Inflation looks likely to ebb, thanks to falling commodity prices and contained labor costs. The U.S. economy, meanwhile, may be set to take another lurch down as consumer spending gives way and the credit crunch intensifies with the plunge in Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s shares.

San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen left open the possibility of a rate cut in comments to reporters after a Sept. 4 speech in Salt Lake City. “There is some chance” of easing credit “if things start going seriously wrong,” she said.

Well … in and of itself, Yellen’s comment doesn’t mean anything. Of course there’s always the possibility of easing. There is also the possibility of … well, just about anything!

Including Lehman’s survival! They have reportedly received some serious bids for their Asset Management business:

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. received bids for its asset-management unit from private-equity firms including Bain Capital LLC and Clayton Dubilier & Rice Inc., as the investment bank seeks offers for the entire firm.

The bids value the unit, which includes the Neuberger Berman fund-management business, private-equity funds and a brokerage firm serving wealthy individuals, at about $5 billion, according to people familiar with the auction who asked not to be named because the process is private.

A very good day for the PerpetualDiscount sector on decent volume.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30.
The Fixed-Reset index was added effective 2008-9-5 at that day’s closing value of 1,119.4 for the Fixed-Floater index.
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Fixed-Floater 4.60% 4.62% 65,314 15.99 6 +0.0270% 1,112.5
Floater 4.40% 4.40% 47,807 16.65 2 -0.1245% 908.3
Op. Retract 4.94% 4.21% 126,651 3.08 14 -0.0328% 1,055.8
Split-Share 5.34% 5.82% 48,684 4.38 14 +0.0620% 1,046.7
Interest Bearing 6.42% 7.19% 51,097 5.19 2 -0.1568% 1,099.0
Perpetual-Premium 6.19% 5.73% 56,778 2.21 1 -0.4339% 1,002.5
Perpetual-Discount 5.99% 6.06% 183,803 13.62 70 +0.4551% 889.0
Fixed-Reset 5.06% 4.89% 1,425,073 14.16 9 +0.0600% 1,120.7
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BNA.PR.C SplitShare -1.1662% Asset coverage of 3.2+:1 as of August 29 according to the company. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 9.34% based on a bid of 16.95 and a hardMaturity 2019-1-10 at 25.00. Compare with BNA.PR.A (6.33% to 2010-9-30) and BNA.PR.B (8.85% to 2016-3-25).
POW.PR.C PerpetualDiscount +1.0080% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.13% based on a bid of 24.05 and a limitMaturity.
W.PR.J PerpetualDiscount +1.0348% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.65% based on a bid of 21.48 and a limitMaturity.
BMO.PR.K PerpetualDiscount +1.0565% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.03% based on a bid of 22.00 and a limitMaturity.
BNS.PR.N PerpetualDiscount +1.0818% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.70% based on a bid of 23.36 and a limitMaturity.
ELF.PR.F PerpetualDiscount +1.1856% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.89% based on a bid of 19.63 and a limitMaturity.
SLF.PR.E PerpetualDiscount +1.3904% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.96% based on a bid of 18.96 and a limitMaturity.
SLF.PR.B PerpetualDiscount +1.4106% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.99% based on a bid of 20.13 and a limitMaturity.
HSB.PR.D PerpetualDiscount +1.5347% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.12% based on a bid of 20.51 and a limitMaturity.
SLF.PR.D PerpetualDiscount +1.5821% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.00% based on a bid of 18.62 and a limitMaturity.
IAG.PR.A PerpetualDiscount +1.8468% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.16% based on a bid of 18.75 and a limitMaturity.
GWO.PR.I PerpetualDiscount +2.0452% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.96% based on a bid of 18.96 and a limitMaturity.
ELF.PR.G PerpetualDiscount +2.4404% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.88% based on a bid of 17.63 and a limitMaturity.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
TD.PR.A FixedReset 908,645 New issue settled today.
TD.PR.M OpRet 107,700 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.94% based on a bid of 26.04 and a softMaturity 2013-10-30 at 25.00.
BNS.PR.L PerpetualDiscount 88,725 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.76% based on a bid of 19.85 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.K FixedReset 84,315 New issue settled Wednesday.
SLF.PR.A PerpetualDiscount 62,400 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.99% based on a bid of 19.90 and a limitMaturity.

There were twenty-six other index-included $25-pv-equivalent issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

TD.PR.A Settles: Above Par on High Volume

Friday, September 12th, 2008

TD Bank has announced:

that a group of underwriters led by TD Securities Inc. has exercised the option to purchase an additional 2 million non-cumulative 5-Year Reset Preferred Shares, Series AA (the “Series AA Shares”) carrying a face value of $25.00 per share. This brings the total issue announced on September 2, 2008, and expected to close September 12, 2008, to 10 million shares and gross proceeds raised under the offering to $250 million. TDBFG has filed in Canada a prospectus supplement to its January 11, 2007 short form base shelf
prospectus in respect of this issue.

Details of this issue were reported when the issue was announced on September 2.

So – another greenshoe fully exercised for a fixed-reset issue! They’re clearly easy to sell, despite various reservations.

TD.PR.A traded 908,645 shares today in a range of 25.00-15, closing at 25.10-12, 10×6. It has been added to the HIMIPref™ database and Fixed-Reset Index.

RF.PR.A: 2.7-million Warrants Sold

Friday, September 12th, 2008

C. A. Bancorp has announced:

the Corporation has closed a public offering today (the “Offering”). The Corporation offered units (the “Units”) at a price of $10.00 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one Class A Share and one warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase a Series 1, Preferred Share (a “Preferred Share”).

At the closing, the Corporation issued 2,700,000 Units for aggregate gross proceeds of $27,000,000. The gross proceeds consisted of $23,181,260 in cash and $3,818,740 in publicly listed Canadian common shares and investment grade securities received under the exchange option of the Offering.

The agents for the Offering have been granted an over-allotment option to purchase up to 405,500 Units at any time during the next 30 days.

The securities forming a Unit will trade together on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) under the symbol RF.UN as a Unit and cannot be transferred except as part of a Unit and the Warrants may not be exercised for the first 30 days after the date hereof. Thereafter, the Class A Shares and the Warrants will trade separately on the TSX under the symbols RF.A and RF.WT, respectively.

Each Warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one Preferred Share at a subscription price of $23.75 at any time on or before 4:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on September 30, 2011.

The Manager uses the maturity value of the aggregate number of Preferred Shares issued and outstanding and compares that value to the tangible net book value of the aggregate number of Class A Shares issued and outstanding as a measure of the debt (the Preferred Shares) to equity (the Class A Shares) ratio of the Corporation (the “Leverage Ratio”). As at June 30, 2008, the Leverage Ratio was 8.8 to 1.

The Offering caused the debt to equity ratio or the Leverage Ratio of the Corporation to decrease. As at the date hereof, the Leverage Ratio is approximately 1.2 to 1.

As previously reported on PrefBlog, there was a 2-million unit minimum on the offering.

RF.PR.A is not tracked by HIMIPref™

PFD.PR.A to Vote on Various Proposals

Friday, September 12th, 2008

The nice thing about holding Charterhouse Preferred Share Index Corporation is that you get invited to a lot of meetings.

JovFunds Management has announced:

Charterhouse Preferred Share Index Corporation (“Charterhouse”), Fairway Diversified Income and Growth Trust (“Fairway Diversified”), Deans Knight Income and Growth Fund (“Deans Knight”) and Long Reserve Life Resource Fund (“Long Reserve”)(collectively, the “Funds”) announce that they will hold special meetings of the shareholders of Charterhouse and unitholders of Fairway Diversified, Deans Knight and Long Reserve (collectively, the “Securityholders”) on October 20, 2008. JovFunds Management Inc. (“JovFunds”) is the manager of each of these products.

At the meetings, Securityholders will be asked to consider and vote on various proposals relating to the Funds in order to be consistent across the Funds and with market practices, and to improve administrative and operational efficiencies that will be fully described in the management information circulars to be provided to Securityholders in advance of the meetings. Securityholders of record on September 19, 2008, will be entitled to receive notice of and vote at the meetings.

I have seen more informative press releases! The result of the August meeting has been discussed on PrefBlog.

PFD.PR.A is not tracked by HIMIPref™.

September PrefLetter Now in Preparation!

Friday, September 12th, 2008

The markets have closed and the September edition of PrefLetter is now being prepared.

PrefLetter is the monthly newsletter recommending individual issues of preferred shares to subscribers. There is at least one recommendation from every major type of preferred share; the recommendations are taylored for “buy-and-hold” investors.

PrefLetter is being expanded commencing this month! Two additional classes of recommendation will be included::

  • Fixed-Reset: My disdain for Fixed-Reset issues as currently priced is well known, but some people like them! Clearly, some of these issues will be better investment choices than others. Now that the asset class has been added to HIMIPref™, a recommendation from this class of preferred share will be included with the other recommendations.
  • Short-Term: I do not usually recommend short-term issues for preferred share portfolios, due in part to the fact that the relatively low level of price volatility gives little opportunity for trading; also due to the idea that the recommendations are for long-term buy-and-hold investors. However, there is public demand for short-term issues. While I will not create a specific asset class for these issues, I will henceforth recommend at least one issue from the combined OpRet / SplitShare indices that would otherwise be ineligible for recommendation due to shortness of term. Note that by “short-term”, I generally mean (as is usual in the bond world) “less than five years”.

There is still time to enter the contest to win a PrefLetter!

The September issue will be eMailed to clients and available for single-issue purchase with immediate delivery prior to the opening bell on Monday. I will write another post on the weekend advising when the new issue has been uploaded to the server … so watch this space carefully if you intend to order “Next Issue” or “Previous Issue”!

FTN.PR.A Asset Coverage to Improve Following Capital Share Consolidation

Friday, September 12th, 2008

Following the shareholder approval of the term extension and during the DBRS Credit Review-Developing, Financial 15 Split Corp. has announced:

a Class A share consolidation for all Class A shareholders of record on September 12, 2008.

The purpose of the share consolidation is to maintain an equal number of Class A shares and Preferred shares outstanding.

As a result of the successful vote to extend the termination date of Financial 15 to December 1, 2015 at the recent Special Meeting of Shareholders held on July 23, 2008, both Class A shareholders and Preferred shareholders were given a special retraction right. This special retraction right allowed both classes of shareholders to tender one or both classes of shares and receive a retraction price based on the August 29 net asset value per unit. In aggregate, there were more Preferred shares tendered for retraction than Class A shares. Since Financial 15 is required to maintain an equal number of shares outstanding for each Class as per the prospectus, the Company must reduce the Class A shares proportionate to the reduction in the Preferred shares.

Immediately after the special retraction payment on September 12, 2008, there would be 7,788,104 Preferred shares and 9,791,021 Class A shares outstanding. In order to restore an equal amount of shares outstanding for each Class, Class A shareholders will have each Class A share consolidated into 0.795432879 Class A shares. In addition the monthly Class A share dividend will be increased from 10 cents per share ($1.20 per annum) to 12.57 cents per share ($1.5084 per annum) in order to maintain the same pre consolidation dividend rate.

The consolidation of the Class A shares has no impact on the intrinsic value of the Class A shares since the net asset value per unit attributable to the Class A shares would increase proportionate to the reduction in the number of Class A shares.

The impact of the share consolidation will be reflected in the next reported net asset value per unit as at September 15, 2008.

This implies that the August 29 asset coverage of about 2.0:1 will increase to about 2.5:1.

September 11, 2008

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

A Bloomberg story pointed me towards remarks by Mervyn King of the BoE regarding long- and short-term bank funding:

we will also set out arrangements to ensure the banking system as a whole will continue to be able to access liquidity insurance from the Bank of England from October 22nd.

The objective of the new facility will be to provide short-term liquidity insurance to smooth the adjustment of financial institutions hit by unexpected shocks. The facility will be an important part of the contribution which the Bank can make to enhance the stability of the banking system. But it is not the purpose of central bank liquidity insurance to provide a source of long-term funding to the financial system – indeed it cannot do that. Only private savers or taxpayers via the government can provide such funds. So I hope everyone will understand that the proposals to be published next week, important though they are, will not and cannot solve the shortage of funding to finance bank lending, including mortgage lending.

So there’s a warning shot! I suspect that the touted new facility – the Special Liquidity Scheme (SLS) will not make new loans after October 21 – will follow Bagehot and include a far more penalizing rate for liquidity injections. The SLS fee is minimal:

Banks will be required to pay a fee to borrow the Treasury Bills. The fee charged will be the spread between the 3-month London Interbank interest rate (Libor) and the 3-month interest rate for borrowing against the security of government bonds, subject to a floor of 20 basis points.

Meanwhile there is the chance that Fannie & Freddie debt might be explicitly nationalized:

The federal takeover of the government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs, on Sept. 7 failed to address whether the debt of Fannie and Freddie should be included in the budget, or whether it carries an explicit government guarantee. In an interview this week, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson cited the “incongruities” in the law and said “we should be clear, is there a government guarantee or isn’t there?”

Any decision to add Fannie and Freddie to the budget wouldn’t automatically translate into an explicit government backing for the companies’ combined $1.7 trillion in unsecured debt and $3.5 trillion of mortgage guarantees. Granting the full faith and credit of the U.S. would require an act of Congress to change the companies’ legal status.

This would bring the Fannie/Freddie debt into a position resembling CMHC mortgage bonds:

CMHC’S GUARANTEE OF CANADA MORTGAGE BONDS CARRIES THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF CANADA, AND CONSTITUTES A DIRECT, UNCONDITIONAL OBLIGATION OF CANADA

CMB have been given Canada’s S&P AAA/Moody’s Aaa credit rating and a 0% capital weighting under the BIS guidelines. CMB are not subject to withholding tax by Canada.

and its direct debt:

CMHC’S DEBT OBLIGATIONS CARRY THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF CANADA, AND CONSTITUTE DIRECT, UNCONDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF AND BY CANADA.

Canada credit and a 0% capital weighting under the BIS guidelines

Though mind you, the CMHC is virtually invisible to retail-level Canadians – they buy their mortgages wholesale from the banks, except for those made in order to help cities build slums. The FannieFreddieFiasco has politicized foreclosures in an election year:

U.S. Senate Banking Committee members urged Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage companies placed under federal control this week, to freeze foreclosures on loans in their portfolios for at least 90 days.

“This action would provide immediate relief to many homeowners” and let the companies “turn these non-performing loans into performing assets to minimize losses,” Senators Charles Schumer, Robert Menendez and other panel Democrats said today in a letter to the companies and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which is overseeing them under the government conservatorship. The companies also should ease their policies on modifying mortgages, the senators wrote.

I guess, if you squint, you can put this politicization in the “unintended consequences” category, together with the Municipal Ratings Mess I posted about today. I just can’t resist noting another unintended consequence of feel-good politics that I learned about today: European Universities get paid for granting diplomas:

Indeed, with the notable exception of the UK, European universities display a poor performance in most international education rankings. According to both the Times Higher Education Supplement and the Shanghai Jiao Tong university rankings, only four institutions in continental Europe would rank among the top 50 universities in the world.

More precisely, the funds allocated to a university [in Italy] increase with the total number of full-time equivalent students (FTE), which is defined as the ratio between the number of exams passed and the number of exams that students should have taken.

The evidence suggests that a financing scheme that was meant to reward universities that produce higher value added is, instead, favouring universities with lower standards.

Surprise, surprise! It reminds me of Communist Russia’s Five Year Plans … tractor factory heads had to meet a production quota measured by weight of shipped products … and responded by building the world’s heaviest tractors.

Lehman continues to twist in the wind and is looking – urgently – for a buyer. The Bank of America has been mentioned. Why not? They’ve warmed up with Countrywide:

“This deal is so rancid and unpredictable,” said Christopher Whalen, managing director at the consulting firm Institutional Risk Analytics. “Bank of America’s executives can’t even articulate what the total liabilities from this deal are.”

Another possibility is for them simply to sell off their crown jewel, but there are financing problems:

Lehman Brothers Holdings originally sought to sell as much as 70% of its investment-management division but scaled that back to a sale of a 55% stake thinking that the private-equity firms mulling a bid would have trouble finding the financing for a bigger deal.

Final bids are due Friday, setting the stage for a weekend of wheeling and dealing if Lehman can fend off today’s brutal market evisceration of its stock, according to people familiar with the matter.

In a comment completely unrelated to Lehman, Blackstone Group COO Tony James said Wednesday that LBO financing has a hard limit of $5 billion these days.

A lot of European junk bond product is now classified as distressed:

More than 30 percent of European high-risk, high-yield bonds are trading at distressed levels, the most in five years, stoking speculation defaults will rise.

Investors demand an extra yield over government debt of more than 10 percentage points to hold 53 of the 169 bonds in Merrill Lynch & Co.’s Euro High Yield Constrained Index. That’s the biggest proportion of distressed debt since March 2003, in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terror attacks and the dot-com crisis.

A surprisingly quiet day on the market, with very few issues trading in substantial size. PerpetualDiscounts eked out a small gain, closing with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.09%, equivalent to interest of 8.53% at the standard 1.4x tax-equivalency factor. Long corporates are at 6.20%, so the spread is still a relatively high 233bp.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30.
The Fixed-Reset index was added effective 2008-9-5 at that day’s closing value of 1,119.4 for the Fixed-Floater index.
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Fixed-Floater 4.60% 4.62% 66,121 15.99 6 -0.3212% 1,112.2
Floater 4.39% 4.39% 47,885 16.66 2 +0.3578% 909.4
Op. Retract 4.94% 4.27% 127,059 3.15 14 +0.2362% 1,056.1
Split-Share 5.34% 5.84% 49,328 4.39 14 +0.0387% 1,046.1
Interest Bearing 6.41% 7.15% 51,746 5.19 2 +0.1576% 1,100.7
Perpetual-Premium 6.16% 5.52% 55,870 2.21 1 -0.0788% 1,006.9
Perpetual-Discount 6.02% 6.09% 183,203 13.76 70 +0.0156% 885.0
Fixed-Reset 5.07% 4.89% 1,284,065 13.99 8 +0.0001% 1,120.0
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
ELF.PR.G PerpetualDiscount -2.5481% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.04% based on a bid of 17.21 and a limitMaturity.
POW.PR.B PerpetualDiscount -1.0314% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.18% based on a bid of 22.07 and a limitMaturity.
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat -1.0200%  
FFN.PR.A SplitShare -1.0152% Asset coverage of just under 1.9:1 as of August 31 according to the company. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.80% based on a bid of 9.75 and a hardMaturity 2014-12-1 at 10.00.
PWF.PR.H PerpetualDiscount +1.2073% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.99% based on a bid of 24.31 and a limitMaturity.
BMO.PR.K PerpetualDiscount +1.2087% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.09% based on a bid of 21.77 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.N PerpetualDiscount +1.2219% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.08% based on a bid of 16.84 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.J OpRet +2.2248% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.02% based on a bid of 23.90 and a softMaturity 2018-3-30 at 25.00. Compare with BAM.PR.H (5.96% to 2012-3-30), BAM.PR.I (5.69% to 2013-12-30) and BAM.PR.O (7.60% to 2013-6-30).
BNA.PR.C SplitShare +2.3270% Asset coverage of 3.2+:1 as of August 29 according to the company. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 9.18% based on a bid of 17.15 and a hardMaturity 2019-1-10 at 25.00. Compare with BNA.PR.A (6.34% to 2010-9-30) and BNA.PR.B (8.89% to 2016-3-25).
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
ENB.PR.A PerpetualDiscount 201,700 Nesbitt crossed 200,000 at 23.57. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.87% based on a bid of 23.57 and a limitMaturity.
TD.PR.P PerpetualDiscount 201,000 Nesbitt crossed 200,000 at 23.30. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.73% based on a bid of 23.23 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.K Fixed-Reset 94,320 New issue settled yesterday. CIBC crossed 50,000 at 24.93.
BNS.PR.R Fixed-Reset 43,400 New issue settled Tuesday. Scotia bought 19,400 from Nesbitt at 25.10.
BNS.PR.Q Fixed-Reset 23,445 RBC crossed 20,000 at 25.10.

There were six other index-included $25-pv-equivalent issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

Global Scale for Municipal Credit Ratings a Bust?

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

Surprise, surprise.

PrefBlog reported on March 13 that Moody’s was going to assign Municipal credit ratings on its Global Scale, an idea I mocked at the time, with continued mockery in the post Municipal Ratings Scale: Be Careful What You Wish For!

Now Bloomberg is reporting:

The difference in borrowing costs for top-rated debt on the current municipal grading scale and A rated tax-exempt bonds in the $2.66 trillion municipal market has widened, rather than narrowed, leading up to when the new higher ratings take effect. The so-called spread has expanded to an average 60 basis points this month, according to Lehman data. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

Interest costs on 15-year debt for Nebraska’s largest public power utility, rated A1 on Moody’s municipal scale, have more than doubled from a year ago relative to top-rated tax-exempt bonds, climbing to 52 basis points, data compiled by Bloomberg and Municipal Market Advisors show.

“We have not witnessed any material tightening in the asset class as a result of the potential recalibration of muni ratings,” said Peter DeGroot, head of the municipal strategies group at New York-based Lehman.

Particularly funny is:

California Treasurer Bill Lockyer said in March that getting a Aaa rating may save taxpayers more than $5 billion over the life of the $61 billion in additional borrowing approved by voters. He also said the state paid $102 million from 2003 to 2007 to buy bond insurance, which would have been “unnecessary” if the state had a top rating.

California won a Aaa rating for its taxable debt in 2007, four grades higher than where Moody’s rates the most populous U.S. state on its municipal scale. Under the new system, the state may be rated instead at Aa2, based on the average, two grades below the top, said Tom Dresslar, Lockyer’s spokesman.

“They are not giving credit where credit is due,” Dresslar said. “The only promise we make to investors is that we will pay you your money on time and in full. California has never failed to do that.”

Many companies that have never yet defaulted on their debt have less than AAA ratings, Mr. Dressler!

And finally, a comment that is at least half-way sensible:

“The mapping of municipal credits to the global scale by Moody’s should have been done many years ago as the U.S. economy was growing strongly,” Mike Pietronico, chief executive officer of Miller Tabak Asset Management in New York, said in an e-mail. “We believe investors will balk at accepting lower yields with inflated ratings, and Moody’s has further damaged their franchise by bowing to political pressure.”

It’s too early to pronounce judgement regarding the effect of the Global Scale on municipal financing costs. The Global Scale isn’t even implemented yet and we are still experiencing interesting times. I suspect that it will not be possible to draw conclusions for at least ten years – long after the heroic politicians have been re-elected and the issue faded again into obscurity.

And I will also point out … I may be wrong on this! Maybe investors, as a class, are so utterly dumb that the cosmetic difference between the scales has had an effect that will unequivocably be shown to have increased the issuers’ expenses substantially.

But maybe it won’t. My concern about the issue is that there is very little public evidence that anybody has thought it through.

September 10, 2008

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

The question of whether the functions of Central Bank and Bank Regulator should be combined or not has been often discussed on PrefBlog. Elsewhere, too, like Frankfurt, with remarks by Ms. Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell of the ECB:

The main position at that time, which remains valid today, is that there is no optimal arrangement for the organisation of supervision at the national level. All organisational models – sectoral supervision, supervision by objectives, supervision in a single authority – can in principle work well or fail depending on circumstances. However, regardless of the model, it is important that there exists a very close and smooth interplay between the central banking and the supervisory function.

Provision of Emergency Liquidity Assistance is a clear point in case where central banks need supervisory information for decision-making. In this field, I believe that an important step forward is represented by the recent MoU on financial stability arrangement signed by the EU central banks, supervisors and ministries of finance in June 2008.

Finally, referring more to the supervisory domain but still linked to the central bank interest, the turmoil has evidenced the need for strengthening the macro-prudential dimension of regulation and supervision. This means the regulatory and supervisory requirements should be able to ensure adequate capital and liquidity buffers throughout the economic cycle. In this regard, the actual impact of the new capital adequacy regime under of Basel II will have to be monitored very closely.

Very bureaucratic! There isn’t the slightest hint of a recommendation in these remarks!

Lehman reported today:

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., reporting the biggest loss in its 158-year history, said it will sell a majority stake in its asset-management unit, spin off commercial real-estate holdings and cut the dividend in an effort to shore up capital and regain investor confidence.

There is little risk I can see that Lehman will flame out with the frightening speed of Bear Stearns – they have access to the discount window:

The program instituted in the aftermath of the Bear Stearns debacle, the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, could be used for funding while officials, regulators and executives find alternative sources of cash, Fed watchers said.

“The PDCF could be used to keep Lehman operating until a broader solution was found,” said Brian Sack, a former Fed research manager who’s now senior economist at Macroeconomic Advisers LLC in Washington. “The challenge is figuring out what the broader solution is.”

Lehman can borrow overnight from the central bank, with escalating costs if it keeps using the program. Because it’s a stopgap, speculation may mount that the government will again intervene to prevent a large financial company from failing, after the Bear Stearns rescue and takeovers of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Speaking of Fannie & Freddie, repercussions on the US preferred share market have been severe:

Prices of fixed-rate preferred stock fell an average of 9 cents to 71.5 cents on the dollar this week, according to Merrill Lynch & Co. index data, the biggest two-day drop in more than a decade. The 11 percent decline compares with a 1.4 percent drop in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index over the same time.

Sales of preferred securities in the U.S. have risen 48 percent this year to about $44 billion from more than $30 billion in the same period of 2007, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The average yield as measured by the Merrill index has risen to 10.1 percent from 8.8 percent on Sept. 5 and 7.9 percent at the end of last year.

Accrued Interest surveys the wreckage and recommends buying mortgage-backeds, while Fannie Mae has announced a $7-billion 2-year issue of its own debt (which, as Accrued Interest pointed out, had a lot taken up by central banks) … and at the same time, Vivendi has cancelled an offering of $846-million 7-years. And another US banking company slashed its common dividend:

Synovus Financial Corp., owner of 35 banks in the Southeastern U.S., will cut 650 jobs, or about 9 percent of its staff, and reduce the dividend by 65 percent to preserve capital depleted by mortgage losses.

The bank will record $15 million in costs for the two-year plan in 2008 and another $6 million later, and expects it will add $75 million in annual pretax earnings, the Columbus, Georgia- based Synovus said today in a statement. The quarterly payout was lowered to 6 cents a share.

All this excitement leaves little time for regulatory grandstanding, but some of them manage it:

Bank of America Corp. will buy back $4.5 billion of auction-rate securities to settle a nationwide probe led by Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin into its sales and marketing of the failed debt.

Bank of America, one of the largest underwriters of the securities, will offer to redeem the securities from its customers between Oct. 1 and Dec. 31, it said in a statement today. The Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank said it expects to record a pretax charge of about $275 million in connection with the buybacks.

Nothing like a little extortion to spice up a regulator’s life, eh?

“Liquidity” has often been mentioned in this blog – there was a story on Bloomberg today highlighting its importance in the day-to-day mechanics of bond trading:

Trading in the corporate bond market has fallen a third after averaging $26 billion a day in the first eight months of 2007, according to Federal Reserve data on primary dealers.

The biggest bond dealers, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Citigroup Inc., aren’t committing as much cash to boost corporate-bond trading. That’s because they’re shoring up their capital after the collapse of the subprime-mortgage market spurred about $511.4 billion of writedowns and losses.

While corporate-bond trading is shrinking, average daily trading in government securities has risen to about $584 billion this year from $560 billion in the same period of 2007, Fed data show.

The decline in corporate-debt trading, known in market parlance as illiquidity, is prompting fund managers to demand higher compensation to buy new bonds, driving up borrowing costs for companies, including American Express Co. and Verizon Communications Inc., and reducing returns on existing securities.

PerpetualDiscounts moved solidly upward on a moderately busy day. Royal Bank issues took the spotlight, with high volume and strong performance.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30.
The Fixed-Reset index was added effective 2008-9-5 at that day’s closing value of 1,119.4 for the Fixed-Floater index.
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Fixed-Floater 4.58% 4.60% 67,661 16.02 6 +0.0542% 1,115.8
Floater 4.35% 4.41% 49,798 16.50 2 +0.3699% 906.2
Op. Retract 4.94% 4.33% 129,253 3.31 14 -0.0947% 1,053.6
Split-Share 5.34% 5.84% 50,491 4.38 14 -0.0404% 1,045.7
Interest Bearing 6.42% 7.18% 53,108 5.20 2 -0.2088% 1,099.0
Perpetual-Premium 6.16% 5.48% 57,749 2.21 1 +0.0789% 1,007.7
Perpetual-Discount 6.02% 6.09% 187,147 13.75 70 +0.1386% 884.9
Fixed-Reset 5.07% 4.89% 1,306,083 13.99 7 +0.2054% 1,120.0
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BNA.PR.C SplitShare -1.4697% Asset coverage of 3.2+:1 as of August 29 according to the company. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 9.48% based on a bid of 16.76 and a hardMaturity 2019-1-10 at 25.00. Compare with BNA.PR.A (6.31% to 2010-9-30) and BNA.PR.B (8.81% to 2016-3-25).
BAM.PR.K Floater -1.3670%  
CIU.PR.A PerpetualDiscount -1.2468% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.11% based on a bid of 19.01 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.I OpRet -1.1417% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.68% based on a bid of 25.11 and a softMaturity 2013-12-30 at 25.00. Compare with BAM.PR.H (6.22% to 2012-3-30), BAM.PR.J (6.32% to 2018-3-30) and BAM.PR.O (7.48% to 2013-6-30).
TCA.PR.Y PerpetualDiscount -1.0471% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.96% based on a bid of 47.25 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.C PerpetualDiscount +1.2448% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.96% based on a bid of 19.52 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.G PerpetualDiscount +1.5173% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.41% based on a bid of 21.41 and a limitMaturity.
PWF.PR.E PerpetualDiscount +1.6000% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.07% based on a bid of 22.86 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.D PerpetualDiscount +1.7525% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.94% based on a bid of 19.16 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.W PerpetualDiscount +1.9006% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.94% based on a bid of 20.91 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.E PerpetualDiscount +1.9058% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.91% based on a bid of 19.25 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.B Floater +2.0408%  
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
BNS.PR.R Fixed-Reset 412,550 New issue settled yesterday. Thirteen blocks were traded, with Nesbitt very active; the two biggest were Nesbitt crossed 40,000 at 25.00 and 34,300 at the same price.
CM.PR.K Fixed-Reset 390,289 New issue settled today. Nine blocks; Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 24.87 and anonymous (not necessarily the same anonymous on each side) crossed 28,000 at 24.80.
RY.PR.D PerpetualDiscount 76,872 Four blocks; each one was anonymous bought 10,000 from Nesbitt at 18.95. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.94% based on a bid of 19.16 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.O OpRet 61,175 Nesbitt bought 12,000 from National at 22.90. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.48% based on a bid of 22.85 and a softMaturity 2013-6-30 at 25.00. ‘Get this thing off the shelves!’ comes the cry from Treasury! See above for comparators.
RY.PR.G PerpetualDiscount 59,370 National bought 20,000 from Anonymous at 19.00. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.98% based on a bid of 19.03 and a limitMaturity.

There were twenty-four other index-included $25-pv-equivalent issues trading over 10,000 shares today.