Those fun-loving directors at the National Bank! Always joking around!
I looked up their Dividend Calendar today in order to update the HIMIPref™ database and there is little, if any, consideration shown for consistency in dividend declaration.
I’ll reproduce their table here:
SHARES
|
BOARD APPROVAL
|
RECORD DATE
|
EX-DIVIDEND DATE
|
DIVIDEND PAYMENT DATE
|
Common
|
2005-12-08
|
2005-12-29
|
2005-12-23
|
2006-02-01
|
Series 15
|
2005-12-08
|
2006-01-13
|
2006-01-11
|
2006-02-15
|
Series 16
|
2005-12-08
|
2006-01-13
|
2006-01-11
|
2006-02-15
|
Common
|
2006-03-02
|
2006-03-30
|
2006-03-28
|
2006-05-01
|
Series 15
|
2006-03-02
|
2006-04-17
|
2006-04-12
|
2006-05-15
|
Séries 16
|
2006-03-02
|
2006-04-17
|
2006-04-12
|
2006-05-15
|
Common
|
2006-05-25
|
2006-06-22
|
2006-06-20
|
2006-08-01
|
Series 15
|
2006-05-25
|
2006-07-07
|
2006-07-05
|
2006-08-15
|
Series 16
|
2006-05-25
|
2006-07-07
|
2006-07-05
|
2006-08-15
|
Common
|
2006-08-31
|
2006-09-28
|
2006-09-26
|
2006-11-01
|
Series 15
|
2006-08-31
|
2006-10-13
|
2006-10-11
|
2006-11-15
|
Series 16
|
2006-08-31
|
2006-10-13
|
2006-10-11
|
2006-11-15
|
Just because the ex-Date was on July 5 doesn’t mean that the October ex-Date will be anywhere near the 5th! Be careful! When I look at the past 14 dividends for NA.PR.K (not including the next one) I get the following frequency of ex-date-day-of-the-month:
Ex-Date Day of Month |
Frequency |
4 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
8 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
12 |
1 |
The 11th and 12th are novel ex-dates, having been introduced only this year.
Yes, I know, it’s a small point. But I see strange trades going through all the time, with some poor retail guy putting through a trade where it’s obvious he hasn’t paid any attention to the ex-date. And by me, when somebody is kind enough to trade your debt on the secondary market, you try to keep things simple for them.
NA.PR.K / NA.PR.L Dividend Timing
Friday, September 29th, 2006Those fun-loving directors at the National Bank! Always joking around!
I looked up their Dividend Calendar today in order to update the HIMIPref™ database and there is little, if any, consideration shown for consistency in dividend declaration.
I’ll reproduce their table here:
SHARES
BOARD APPROVAL
RECORD DATE
EX-DIVIDEND DATE
DIVIDEND PAYMENT DATE
Common
2005-12-08
2005-12-29
2005-12-23
2006-02-01
Series 15
2005-12-08
2006-01-13
2006-01-11
2006-02-15
Series 16
2005-12-08
2006-01-13
2006-01-11
2006-02-15
Common
2006-03-02
2006-03-30
2006-03-28
2006-05-01
Series 15
2006-03-02
2006-04-17
2006-04-12
2006-05-15
Séries 16
2006-03-02
2006-04-17
2006-04-12
2006-05-15
Common
2006-05-25
2006-06-22
2006-06-20
2006-08-01
Series 15
2006-05-25
2006-07-07
2006-07-05
2006-08-15
Series 16
2006-05-25
2006-07-07
2006-07-05
2006-08-15
Common
2006-08-31
2006-09-28
2006-09-26
2006-11-01
Series 15
2006-08-31
2006-10-13
2006-10-11
2006-11-15
Series 16
2006-08-31
2006-10-13
2006-10-11
2006-11-15
Just because the ex-Date was on July 5 doesn’t mean that the October ex-Date will be anywhere near the 5th! Be careful! When I look at the past 14 dividends for NA.PR.K (not including the next one) I get the following frequency of ex-date-day-of-the-month:
The 11th and 12th are novel ex-dates, having been introduced only this year.
Yes, I know, it’s a small point. But I see strange trades going through all the time, with some poor retail guy putting through a trade where it’s obvious he hasn’t paid any attention to the ex-date. And by me, when somebody is kind enough to trade your debt on the secondary market, you try to keep things simple for them.
Posted in Issue Comments | No Comments »