Month end, and a funny day in the markets! American equities were hit, with a few companies exposed to sub-prime taking the brunt; Canadian equities stayed even, thanks to a CAD 5.8-billion takeover bid for Western Oil Sands by Marathon Oil.
Treasuries were strong, while Canadas were up a tad, further widening the rate gap … and I do mean widening! For purposes of US/Canada spreads, the vocabulary was established long, long ago, and “widening” means “Canada did worse”. Always.
The differing behaviour is due to – you guessed it! – sub-prime, other junk and hedge funds. Bear Stearns suspended redemptions in another fund, while Macquarie Fortress announced a monthly return of -25% on its high-yield (not sub-prime!) funds. Three French funds are toast, due to the classic:
“Like many actors, we have tried to revitalize the performance of our funds by investing in CDOs,” Arnaud Ploix, a spokesman for Paris-based Oddo, said in an interview today. “Like others, we noticed recent problems with short-term liquidity and were caught out by the subprime dilemma.”
Still … carnage means carrion, so there are some happy people out there (besides Deutsche Bank!). It’s probably a good time to short hedge funds! But you know things are getting interesting when three super-major dealers’ bonds trade as junk!
But take a break for some perspective:
High-yield, high-risk bonds lost 3.1 percent in July, their worst monthly performance since 2002, as concerns about an onslaught of debt to finance leveraged buyouts drove down prices.
Returning to our more normal and much more interesting apocalyptic screaming, there are musings that the USD 37.2-billion takeover of TXU is at risk, with the suddenly nervous financiers tempted to pay a billion bucks to get out of the deal. Observant readers will not that both amounts are oddly reminiscent of the BCE / Teachers’ agreement, but the musings are rebutted on another news service. Trial balloon? Chatter from clerks? Who knows? There would be a big reputational hit to take.
Meanwhile, back in the real economy (remember that?) US Inflation news was reasonably encouraging. There is no word yet on how third-tranche double-knockout inflation swaptions reacted to this story.
It looks like Murdoch will buy Dow Jones. It is not yet clear how much he will bid for Prefblog. Yo! Murdoch! Call me!
Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30 | |||||||
Index | Mean Current Yield (at bid) | Mean YTW | Mean Average Trading Value | Mean Mod Dur (YTW) | Issues | Day’s Perf. | Index Value |
Ratchet | 4.93% | 4.92% | 25,041 | 15.63 | 2 | +0.2060% | 1,039.4 |
Fixed-Floater | 4.98% | 5.11% | 131,615 | 15.46 | 8 | -0.0252% | 1,021.5 |
Floater | 4.85% | 1.06% | 76,954 | 11.52 | 4 | +0.0202% | 1,049.6 |
Op. Retract | 4.84% | 4.07% | 85,789 | 3.12 | 16 | -0.0348% | 1,020.3 |
Split-Share | 5.06% | 4.60% | 102,302 | 3.93 | 17 | -0.1769% | 1,046.5 |
Interest Bearing | 6.25% | 6.67% | 62,938 | 4.65 | 3 | +0.1383% | 1,031.7 |
Perpetual-Premium | 5.54% | 5.23% | 114,037 | 5.93 | 26 | -0.1430% | 1,022.0 |
Perpetual-Discount | 5.08% | 5.12% | 330,656 | 15.31 | 38 | +0.0585% | 973.3 |
Major Price Changes | |||
Issue | Index | Change | Notes |
BNA.PR.B | SplitShare (for now! Will be “Scraps” after rebalancing, due to volume concerns) | -1.9522% | Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.32% based on a bid of 24.61 and a hardMaturity 2016-3-25 at 25.00 |
CFS.PR.A | SplitShare | -1.3834% | Giving up yesterday’s gains. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.36% based on a bid of 9.98 and a hardMaturity 2012-1-31 at 10.00. |
LFE.PR.A | SplitShare | +1.2597% | Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.31% based on a bid of 10.45 and a hardMaturity 2012-12-1 at 10.00 |
Volume Highlights | |||
Issue | Index | Volume | Notes |
BMO.PR.J | PerpetualDiscount | 65,700 | Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.97% based on a bid of 23.01 and a limitMaturity. |
MFC.PR.A | OpRet | 59,790 | Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.29% based on a bid of 24.82 and a softMaturity 2015-12-18 at 25.00. |
BAM.PR.H | OpRet | 52,447 | Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 26.60. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.28% based on a bid of 26.60 and a call 2008-10-30 at 25.75. |
GWO.PR.E | OpRet | 33,905 | RBC crossed 30,000 at 25.80. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.96% based on a bid of 25.76 and a call 2011-4-30 at 25.00. A related issue, GWL.PR.L, has recently been called and there is an eagerly awaited (by me, anyway) earnings announcement tomorrow. |
CM.PR.J | PerpetualDiscount | 19,120 | Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.00% based on a bid of 22.62 and a limitMaturity. |
There were fourteen other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.
Is it the End of the World?
Sunday, July 29th, 2007On the July 27, 2007 post, assiduous reader kaspu asked:
Y’know, kaspu, without meaning any offense: I hate this sort of question.
It’s completely open-ended and the only parameters that you’re giving me are “complete corporate credit debacle” – which is a very open ended kind of thing. For any scenario I propose as a base case, for any scenario I propose as a worst case, you can say “Well, yeah, but what if … “. One of my favourite pieces of economic trivia is the fact that the during the Great Depression, there were instances of US Treasury Bills trading above par. Why shouldn’t they? Put your money in a bank, it’ll go bust. Put your money under your mattress, it will get stolen. Buy US T-bills above par and at least you know how much you’ll be losing…
What I’m trying to say is … you might not be satisfied with my answer!
I don’t think the current situation is as bad as all that. It’s certainly bad enough, for those who bought junk mortgage paper and those who had indirect, but highly leveraged, exposure via hedge funds, but I don’t see the world ending any time soon.
We are definitely heading into a period during which junk yields will be higher than they have been in the past few years; this will choke off leveraged buy-outs (at least until the next frenzy) and thereby blow a little froth of the equity markets. This is happening right now … according to Markit’s daily wrap-up:
According to this wrap-up, credit derivative swaps on HCA blew wider by 102bp to 555bp, while GMAC LLC was 94bp wider to 480bp. I do not profess to be an expert on CDS history – or even to have a huge amount of expertise in the field – but it seems to me that this kind of move, in the absence of company specific news, must be some kind of record. We are in the panic phase, and spreads might even go as high as they were in 2001!
2001? Have a look at what the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco had to say in 2001, when spreads spiked into the +1000bp area:
In other words … it’s all about liquidity. We have just been through a period in which every brain-dead retail stockbroker in the world was telling his clients that an extra 300bp on bonds was free and easy … we are now entering a period in which they are calling their clients and triumphantly telling them that they were able to get out at only +500. The more time I spend in this business, the more influence I attribute to the brain-dead retail stockbroker!
Now, none of this can really be called a direct answer to your question, but I’ll start trying now. There will be an influence on investment grade corporate bond spreads – and there already has been. Spreads moved wider on the week, because credit quality is a continuum. There is no magic line between Investment Grade and Junk … if Junk yields move higher, then Investment Grade will, to some extent, follow them, because investors will connect the dots and say ‘Gee … I can pick up a whole bunch of extra yield by accepting a relatively small amount of extra credit risk! When I divide return by risk, I get a big number! Time to trade!’
Spreads on paper of the quality you were talking about are something of a conundrum. Bank perp prefs are now yielding 5%-odd, interest equivalent of 7%-odd, which is basically Canadas +250bp, which is basically OK by me. I have previously expressed surprise at the very narrow spreads the market gives to Innovative Tier One Capital – which is basically a pref sold in the bond market, and these spreads have a long way to go before they’re even close.
If anything, I think a flight to quality corporates should be good for the high-quality end of the preferred share market, but I’m not going to hold my breath. The bank-perp-pref tax-equivalent spread to Canadas could very well vary by 50bp – up or down – and trying to outguess that is a mug’s game. If one of the banks gets into trouble with Junk exposure, we could very well see a spike in yields of those – but at that point, I’ll probably be in there buying!
Update 2007-07-30: More comment … Tom Graff’s headline is “We’re doomed” … but the post itself is at least a little bit more cheerful.
Posted in Reader Initiated Comments | No Comments »