This sounds like a good programme:
Unemployed (USURTOT) and pregnant with her second child in late 2013, Shantel Burris knew she needed to make a change. In a year, the 24-year-old went from jobless benefits to earning double the New York minimum wage.
Her first step was getting a high school diploma, and a chat with a counselor sparked a “nonstop” process of preparation centered on 11 weeks of free job training and a battery of mock interviews at Career Network: Healthcare. The New York initiative trained and matched her with a position in August at Montefiore Medical Center, where she prepares patient meal trays for $16.08 an hour.
Programs like Career Network seek to alleviate a shortage of workers in jobs that require less than a bachelor’s degree though more than a high school diploma. For the 146.2 million Americans who are 18 and older without an associate’s or higher degree, such opportunities offer a pathway to higher pay and job stability that would be difficult to find on their own.
Success hinges on identifying openings at local employers and equipping a spectrum of Americans — from the jobless to the underemployed — with needed skills. Such programs might also help hiring catch up with job vacancies, which are near a record high.
…
The need for a demand-driven approach became apparent when JPMorgan Chase & Co., as part of its philanthropic efforts, explored ways to reduce the so-called skills gap. The New York-based company in December announced New Skills at Work, a five-year $250 million global project to tailor training to available jobs.
…
JPMorgan will examine labor demand in nine U.S. metro areas, identifying fast-growing industries with middle-skill openings and better pay. The data and funding will be shared with community organizations serving youth and long-term unemployed.
I think someone at CDHowe reads PrefBlog:
Canada’s central bank should start publishing minutes of interest-rate meetings including any dissenting views, to meet the standards of counterparts in the U.S. and U.K., a research group said.
Such a move would improve the Ottawa-based Bank of Canada’s transparency and improve public understanding of the process used to determine interest rates, the Toronto-based C.D. Howe Institute said in a report due to be published today.
The central bank has resisted disclosing minutes, saying the rate-setting panel works by consensus and the distilled views of policy makers are represented in the statements that accompany the eight-yearly rate decisions.
…
“Withholding dissenting opinions has the potential to limit public understanding of important monetary policy questions,” Pierre Siklos, an economics professor at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo, Ontario, said in a summary of the report, co-authored with Matthias Neuenkirch at the University of Trier in Germany.
I said the same thing on October 10, 2014 and December 10, 2013 … and probably earlier, since I’ve thought this forever, but I won’t bother looking up more dates.
Ben Steverman of Bloomberg points out that that even US banks are still in the pre-PC mainframe era:
Behind every check written, card swiped and paycheck delivered is an antiquated payment system that isn’t real time. About $80 trillion a year flows by fits and starts through a Rube Goldberg-like set of interlocking payment networks. The most prominent is the Automated Clearing House, or ACH, now celebrating its 40th birthday. These networks carry funds electronically, yes. But they often only sync up with banks once a day. In other words, if you miss today’s only flight off Kiribati, then you have to wait for tomorrow’s.
It can take a customer of a U.S. bank more than three days to transfer funds to another U.S. bank. Banks haven’t seen an advantage in speeding that up, even though the lag is painful for businesses and families. Purchases don’t always clear before a store owner has to pony up for more inventory. Families get hit with overdraft fees when checks really are in the mail.
…
What the U.S. needs, the Federal Reserve said last month, is an entirely “new infrastructure” to keep banks connected day, night and through the weekend. Then last week, the Clearing House, a group owned by the largest banks, said it would build a real-time payment network. It didn’t specify a time frame or release cost estimates. It did say your bank would credit your account immediately and settle up with the payer’s bank later. The Fed estimates businesses could save $10 to $40 billion with a more efficient network.
…
Banks have been procrastinating on an upgrade. They worry changing over 1970s-era networks will be a big hassle. A 24/7 system will need to sync with bank’s old batch systems, which are designed to need maintenance on Sundays. And, if popular enough, real-time payments could threaten banks’ annual collection of $30 billion in overdraft fees and more than $12 billion in card fees.
That’s NUTHIN’! For a bachelor’s degree in Banking Contempt, transfer money across the Canada-US border. For a master’s, transfer it abroad. And for a Ph.D., see what happens when one of the clerks along the way makes a trivial data-input error. That’s happened to me … the money just disappears for a few days. Completely. They can’t even guess what happened.
IIROC – a regulatory organization notable for funnelling slush-funds to well-connected, friendly enterprises – has stepped up its interference in the bond market:
The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada said Thursday that it will change the reporting system for debt securities dealers. They will soon be required to report every trade on a daily basis, rather than weekly.
…
The new rules officially come into effect in two phases starting in November 2015, and they are meant to tighten up the current market trade reporting system (MTRS), which is based on weekly statistics that IIROC has said are not dependable enough, since methodologies differ among the firms.Under the current reporting system, dealers issue a weekly aggregate transaction report to the Bank of Canada through MTRS. In the new system, called MTRS 2.0, IIROC dealer members will swiftly report to IIROC all of their over the counter debt security transactions, as well as those of their affiliates that are government securities distributors (GSDs). IIROC will then share the data with the Bank of Canada.
Enbridge was confirmed at Pfd-2(low) by DBRS:
DBRS has confirmed the Issuer Rating of Enbridge Inc. (ENB or the Company) at A (low) and ratings on ENB’s Medium-Term Notes & Unsecured Debentures, Commercial Paper and Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares ratings at A (low), R-1 (low) and Pfd-2 (low), respectively, all with Stable trends. The ratings reflect (1) a relatively strong business risk profile, (2) pressure on ENB’s near-to-medium-term credit metrics and (3) results under the ten-year Competitive Tolling Settlement (CTS), effective July 1, 2011.
…
(2) DBRS expects ENB’s credit metrics, on fully consolidated and modified consolidated bases, to be pressured during the early years of its planned $37 billion capex program (excluding Sponsored Investments) from 2014 to 2018, due to a significant debt financing component related to large free cash flow deficits. DBRS expects improvement in the later years (as the longer-dated projects come onstream and begin to generate cash flow).
Enbridge has a lot of issues outstanding – roughly 10% of the universe. ENB.PF.A, ENB.PF.C, ENB.PF.E, ENB.PF.G, ENB.PR.A, ENB.PR.B, ENB.PR.D, ENB.PR.F, ENB.PR.H, ENB.PR.J, ENB.PR.N, ENB.PR.P, ENB.PR.T and ENB.PR.Y.
It was a mildly positive day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts, FixedResets and DeemedRetractibles all gaining 3bp. Volatility was average. Volume was very low.
The TMXMoney screen for BAM.PR.E is worth a picture:
HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices Values are provisional and are finalized monthly |
|||||||
Index | Mean Current Yield (at bid) |
Median YTW |
Median Average Trading Value |
Median Mod Dur (YTW) |
Issues | Day’s Perf. | Index Value |
Ratchet | 3.33 % | 3.33 % | 18,207 | 18.96 | 1 | 7.0919 % | 2,512.0 |
FixedFloater | 0.00 % | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | -0.4131 % | 3,972.5 |
Floater | 3.00 % | 3.11 % | 62,797 | 19.44 | 4 | -0.4131 % | 2,667.4 |
OpRet | 4.02 % | -2.41 % | 104,285 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.1571 % | 2,748.7 |
SplitShare | 4.27 % | 3.61 % | 72,619 | 3.79 | 5 | 0.0802 % | 3,169.5 |
Interest-Bearing | 0.00 % | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.1571 % | 2,513.4 |
Perpetual-Premium | 5.46 % | -4.00 % | 70,552 | 0.08 | 18 | 0.0698 % | 2,468.1 |
Perpetual-Discount | 5.25 % | 5.09 % | 102,249 | 15.22 | 18 | 0.0330 % | 2,625.7 |
FixedReset | 4.20 % | 3.64 % | 171,691 | 8.58 | 75 | 0.0324 % | 2,570.5 |
Deemed-Retractible | 5.00 % | 2.00 % | 98,728 | 0.17 | 42 | 0.0325 % | 2,579.6 |
FloatingReset | 2.55 % | 0.72 % | 69,573 | 0.16 | 6 | 0.1761 % | 2,550.1 |
Performance Highlights | |||
Issue | Index | Change | Notes |
PWF.PR.A | Floater | -2.56 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2044-10-30 Maturity Price : 19.00 Evaluated at bid price : 19.00 Bid-YTW : 2.75 % |
FTS.PR.G | FixedReset | -1.20 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2044-10-30 Maturity Price : 23.16 Evaluated at bid price : 24.70 Bid-YTW : 3.65 % |
BAM.PR.T | FixedReset | 1.06 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2044-10-30 Maturity Price : 23.44 Evaluated at bid price : 24.86 Bid-YTW : 3.85 % |
MFC.PR.F | FixedReset | 1.66 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Hard Maturity Maturity Date : 2025-01-31 Maturity Price : 25.00 Evaluated at bid price : 22.70 Bid-YTW : 4.32 % |
BAM.PR.E | Ratchet | 7.09 % | There were two trades today, at 23.47 and 23.48, which must have overloaded the computers and taxed the expertise of market-maker, because (as shown by the screenshot above) TMXMoney is reporting the CDN Consolidated Quote as no-bid, no-offer, even though they also show a TSX quote of 22.50-49. We are left to conclude that the Toronto Exchange is no longer included in the Canadian consolidation.
Anyway, this market move report isn’t real, it’s just a reversal of yesterday’s nonsense. |
Volume Highlights | |||
Issue | Index | Shares Traded |
Notes |
TRP.PR.A | FixedReset | 208,235 | The first Exchange Date is 2014-12-31 and the dividend will (barring ridiculously low-probability events) fall substantially (HIMIPref™ incorporates the current estimate in the calculated yield).
Desjardins crossed 200,000 at 21.73. |
NA.PR.W | FixedReset | 171,770 | Recent new issue. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2044-10-30 Maturity Price : 23.15 Evaluated at bid price : 25.01 Bid-YTW : 3.67 % |
BMO.PR.S | FixedReset | 131,674 | Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 25.52. Scotia crossed blocks of 25,000 and 49,200, both at 25.52. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Call Maturity Date : 2019-05-25 Maturity Price : 25.00 Evaluated at bid price : 25.48 Bid-YTW : 3.49 % |
BMO.PR.K | Deemed-Retractible | 103,062 | Scotia crossed two blocks of 25,000 each and one of 49,200, all at 25.78. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Call Maturity Date : 2014-12-25 Maturity Price : 25.50 Evaluated at bid price : 25.77 Bid-YTW : -4.08 % |
FTS.PR.H | FixedReset | 102,650 | Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 20.25. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2044-10-30 Maturity Price : 20.21 Evaluated at bid price : 20.21 Bid-YTW : 3.74 % |
PWF.PR.E | Perpetual-Premium | 81,145 | Desjardins bought blocks of 39,600 and 39,500 from anonymous, both at 25.40. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Call Maturity Date : 2014-11-29 Maturity Price : 25.00 Evaluated at bid price : 25.34 Bid-YTW : -10.84 % |
There were 16 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares. |
Wide Spread Highlights | ||
Issue | Index | Quote Data and Yield Notes |
RY.PR.I | FixedReset | Quote: 25.45 – 25.78 Spot Rate : 0.3300 Average : 0.2048 YTW SCENARIO |
ENB.PR.F | FixedReset | Quote: 24.62 – 24.89 Spot Rate : 0.2700 Average : 0.1725 YTW SCENARIO |
BNS.PR.Q | FixedReset | Quote: 25.36 – 25.64 Spot Rate : 0.2800 Average : 0.1950 YTW SCENARIO |
TD.PR.T | FloatingReset | Quote: 25.40 – 25.69 Spot Rate : 0.2900 Average : 0.2076 YTW SCENARIO |
ENB.PR.B | FixedReset | Quote: 24.62 – 24.84 Spot Rate : 0.2200 Average : 0.1438 YTW SCENARIO |
W.PR.H | Perpetual-Premium | Quote: 25.06 – 25.50 Spot Rate : 0.4400 Average : 0.3639 YTW SCENARIO |
FTS Outlook Revised By S&P From Negative To Stable
Tuesday, October 28th, 2014Following the conversion of convertible debentures Standard & Poor’s has announced:
The previous assessment of a negative outlook was previously reported on PrefBlog.
Fortis Inc. has several preferred issues trading on the Toronto Exchange: FTS.PR.E (OperatingRetractible); FTS.PR.F and FTS.PR.J (PerpetualDiscount); and FTS.PR.G, FTS.PR.H, FTS.PR.K and FTS.PR.M (FixedReset).
Posted in Issue Comments | No Comments »