Issue Comments

FCS.PR.B Credit Quality to Improve

PrefBlog’s awesome power has been illustrated yet again, as Faircourt Asset Management, the Manager of Faircourt Split Trust , has announced:

that $13,996,390 in aggregate principal amount of the Trust’s outstanding 6.25% Preferred Securities (the “Preferred Securities”) will be redeemed on July 22, 2011 (the “Redemption Payment Date”). The record date of the Preferred Securities partial redemption is July 15, 2011.

Proceeds from the Preferred Securities redemption will amount to $10.0377 for each $10.00 principal amount of Securities, being equal to the aggregate of (i) $10.00 (the “Redemption Price”), and (ii) all accrued and unpaid interest hereon to but excluding the Redemption Payment Date (collectively, the “Total Redemption Price”).

The interest upon the principal amount of Preferred Securities called for redemption shall cease to be payable from and after the Redemption Payment Date, unless payment of the Total Redemption Price shall not be made on presentation for surrender of such Preferred Securities on or after the Redemption Payment Date or prior to the setting aside of the Total Redemption Price pursuant to the Indenture.

Securities will be redeemed pro rata from each beneficial holder of Securities pursuant to the procedures of CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc. Beneficial holders of Preferred Securities should contact their broker with any questions regarding the redemption.

The size of the preferred share redemption exactly counterbalances the unmatched Capital Unit retraction discussed on PrefBlog in the post FCS.PR.B Credit Quality to Deteriorate.

FCS.PR.B is tracked by HIMIPref™, but is relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

Issue Comments

BSC.PR.B Warrant Offering Fully Subscribed; Added to HIMIPref™

Scotia Managed Companies, the sponsor of BNS Split Corp. II has announced:

the completion of its warrant offering.

The gross proceeds from the exercise of the warrants totaled $63.0 million, representing 100% of the maximum available subscription amount.

The net proceeds from the exercise of the warrants will be invested in accordance with the investment objectives of the Company.

BNS Split Corp. II is a mutual fund corporation created to hold a portfolio of common shares of The Bank of Nova Scotia. The Capital Shares and Preferred Shares of BNS Split Corp. II are listed for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols BSC and BSC.PR.B, respectively.

This doubles the size of the issue, meaning that there are now about 2.6-million shares outstanding with a par value of 18.85. This is sufficient to provide meaningful liquidity – not great, but meaningful – and the issue has been added to HIMIPref™ effective on the date of original issue, 2010-9-22. Purists will object to the backdating on the grounds that this increases selection bias in the HIMIPref™ universe; purists are invited to go take a running jump.

Issue information has been taken from the prospectus of the original issue.

BSC.PR.B was last mentioned on PrefBlog when I reported the imminent expiration of the warrants. BSC.PR.B is currently included in the Scraps index.

Market Action

July 7, 2011

Europeans want a rating agency that follows political instructions:

Europe’s leaders are accusing the world’s largest credit-rating agencies of bias in assessing the debt of troubled countries, renewing calls for the creation of a European rating agency.

The complaints were sparked after Moody’s downgraded Portugal by four notches Tuesday to “junk” status, and Standard & Poor’s warned Monday it would consider it a “selective default” if banks and insurers roll over about $42-billion of Greek debt – a move that could derail efforts to restructure Greece’s debt.

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said Wednesday he was surprised by the decision to downgrade Portugal, saying he “can’t decipher” the basis for the evaluation.

“We need to break the oligopoly of rating agencies,” he told reporters in Berlin.

Meanwhile Satyajit Das has a nice piece in the Globe, unsuccessfully attempting to make the numbers add up:

Under the sketchy proposal, for every €100 of maturing bonds, the banks will subscribe to new 30-year securities, but only equal to €70 (70 per cent). The banks will keep €50 and invest the other €20 in 30-year high-quality zero-coupon bonds (via a special purpose vehicle) to secure repayment of the new bonds. The new 30-year Greek debt will carry an interest rate of 5.5 per cent per annum with a bonus element linked to Greek growth of up to an additional 2.5 per cent.

Of the €340-billion in outstanding Greek bonds, banks hold 27 per cent, institutional and retail investors hold 43 per cent and the International Monetary Fund and European Central Bank hold 30 per cent. It is not clear whether non-bank investors are willing to participate in the arrangements. The ECB has previously resisted any debt restructuring, including maturity extension.

The French plan assumes holders of bonds would agree to roll over 50 per cent of their holdings to provide Greece net funding of €30-billion ($41-billion). But under the French banking federation’s own figures, this would be impossible unless all the €60.5-billion (excluding central bank holdings) maturing by mid-2014 is rolled over. This is inconsistent with the proposal’s assumption of investor acceptance of 80 per cent.

Greece must find €50 for every €100 debt exchanged under the proposal. Given it has no access to commercial funding, this would have to come from the EU, IMF, EFSF or ECB.

Greece’s cost would be between 7.7 per cent and 11.20 per cent per annum, as it only receives €50 of the €70 face value of the new bonds. Assuming the remaining funding is at 6 per cent, then Greece’s blended rate for every €100 of finance would be 6.85-8.60 per cent per annum, compared to the 7-8 per cent per annum considered sustainable by markets.

Most importantly, the overall level of debt, considered unsustainable, of Greece would remain unchanged.

Speaking of numbers that don’t add up, there’s more Sino-Forest related news:

John Paulson lost 11 percent in his biggest fund in June, according to an investor, as the firm sold off Sino-Forest Corp. (TRE) after a short-seller’s allegations.

The drop left Paulson’s Advantage Plus Fund, which uses strategies designed to profit from corporate events such as takeovers and bankruptcies, down 18 percent this year, said the client, who asked not to be named because the information is private. The fund’s gold-denominated share class declined 11 percent in June and 12 percent in 2011.

The crows are feasting on Nortel’s unexpectedly fat corpse:

Two and half years on, the breakup of Nortel Networks Corp. is all but complete save for one last but significant obstacle — how to allocate an unexpectedly large pile of cash of more than US$10-billion.

That job falls on the shoulders of Ontario Chief Justice Warren Winkler, who Wednesday was appointed mediator for all outstanding claims, which could swell in light of the colossal sum raised through last week’s US$4.5-billion patent sale to a consortium of technology giants.

Unsecured holders of Nortel’s suddenly hot bonds will also expect to be paid out at 100¢ on the dollar. Bonds maturing in 2013 and 2016 carry coupons of more 10% and are trading well above par. Each class of bond is up more than 650% since hitting bottom in February 2009.

JPMorgan was naughty:

Typically, when investors purchase municipal securities, the municipalities temporarily invest the proceeds of the sales in municipal reinvestment products until the money is used for the intended purposes. Under relevant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulations, the proceeds of tax-exempt municipal securities generally must be invested at fair market value. The most common way of establishing fair market value is through a competitive bidding process in which bidding agents search for the appropriate investment vehicle for a municipality.

The SEC alleges that from 1997 through 2005, JPMS’s fraudulent practices, misrepresentations and omissions undermined the competitive bidding process, affected the prices that municipalities paid for reinvestment products, and deprived certain municipalities of a conclusive presumption that the reinvestment instruments had been purchased at fair market value. JPMS’s fraudulent conduct also jeopardized the tax-exempt status of billions of dollars in municipal securities because the supposed competitive bidding process that establishes the fair market value of the investment was corrupted. The employees involved in the alleged misconduct are no longer with the company.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, JPMS, acting as the agent for its affiliated commercial bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., at times won bids because it obtained information from the bidding agents about competing bids, a practice known as “last looks.” In other instances, it won bids set up in advance for JPMS to win (“set-ups”) because the bidding agent deliberately obtained non-winning bids from other providers, and it facilitated bids rigged for others to win by deliberately submitting non-winning bids.

Dan Hallett has another nice piece in the Globe, How rising rates may affect bond portfolios.

RBC may be going into the ETF business:

Royal Bank of Canada (RY-T54.57-0.24-0.44%), which owns Canada’s largest mutual fund player, is the second domestic bank to jump into the fast-growing exchange traded fund (ETF) business.

Its fund arm, RBC Global Asset Management, has filed a preliminary prospectus to list eight, target-date maturity corporate bond ETFs on the Toronto Stock Exchange. These ETFs wind up in a specified year ranging from 2013 to 2020, and the cash is distributed to unitholders.

Jonathan Chevreau comments:

The entry of Canada’s largest bank, RBC, into exchange-traded funds is bound to legitimize the fast-growing ETF industry, just as the banks made mutual funds a household name in the late 1980s.

Yes, sir, that’s what ETFs need! Legitimacy!

Canada nestled deeper into Israel’s pocket:

The committee recommends that police forces across Canada be better trained to deal with anti-Semitism; that universities host conferences to counter events such as “Israeli Apartheid Week”; and that there should be a clear definition of what anti-Semitism entails.

The CPCCA countered that it did not want to limit reasonable criticism of Israel. But it also explained that “anti-Semitism is being manifested in a manner which has never been dealt with before. … This problem is especially prevalent on campuses where Jewish students are ridiculed and intimidated for any deemed support for the ‘Nazi’ and ‘apartheid’ State of Israel, which is claimed to have no right to exist.”

Don’t engage in vigorous debate! Not in Canada! The people with whom you vehemently disagree might be fwightened! Some of us believe that criticism of Israel, no matter how vociferous and ignorant, is not anti-Semitism – but perhaps the CPCCA considers that at anti-Semitic viewpoint. At least we can all be joyful that the CPCCA does not want to limit what it deems to be reasonable criticism of Israel. Golly, thanks guys!

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts losing 15bp, FixedResets winning 10bp, and DeemedRetractibles up 1bp. Volatility was good. Volume was fair.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.7155 % 2,439.8
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.7155 % 3,669.5
Floater 2.48 % 2.24 % 43,047 21.71 4 -0.7155 % 2,634.4
OpRet 4.87 % 1.89 % 63,540 0.23 9 0.0214 % 2,444.3
SplitShare 5.23 % 1.33 % 53,750 0.64 6 -0.0598 % 2,513.9
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0214 % 2,235.1
Perpetual-Premium 5.70 % 5.25 % 137,842 0.80 13 0.0734 % 2,086.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.47 % 5.47 % 117,853 14.70 17 -0.1546 % 2,188.2
FixedReset 5.17 % 3.21 % 220,429 2.69 57 0.1010 % 2,318.8
Deemed-Retractible 5.09 % 4.86 % 272,791 8.12 47 0.0121 % 2,155.5
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
TRI.PR.B Floater -2.68 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-07
Maturity Price : 22.98
Evaluated at bid price : 23.25
Bid-YTW : 2.24 %
SLF.PR.A Deemed-Retractible -1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.01
Bid-YTW : 5.81 %
POW.PR.D Perpetual-Discount -1.22 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-07
Maturity Price : 23.11
Evaluated at bid price : 23.46
Bid-YTW : 5.33 %
SLF.PR.B Deemed-Retractible -1.11 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.14
Bid-YTW : 5.80 %
PWF.PR.E Perpetual-Discount -1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-07
Maturity Price : 24.20
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 5.61 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset 5.48 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.84
Bid-YTW : 3.69 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
MFC.PR.A OpRet 113,354 TD crossed 100,000 at 25.55.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2015-12-18
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.50
Bid-YTW : 3.67 %
CM.PR.L FixedReset 106,138 TD crossed 100,000 at 27.36.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.35
Bid-YTW : 2.86 %
HSB.PR.E FixedReset 51,113 RBC crossed 48,500 at 27.55.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.50
Bid-YTW : 3.13 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 49,799 Scotia crossed 45,000 at 25.60.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-07
Maturity Price : 23.38
Evaluated at bid price : 25.60
Bid-YTW : 3.67 %
CU.PR.B Perpetual-Premium 26,433 National crossed 25,000 at 25.55.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-08-06
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.45
Bid-YTW : 3.42 %
RY.PR.G Deemed-Retractible 23,975 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.33
Bid-YTW : 4.92 %
There were 31 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
TRI.PR.B Floater Quote: 23.25 – 24.25
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.6787

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-07
Maturity Price : 22.98
Evaluated at bid price : 23.25
Bid-YTW : 2.24 %

IAG.PR.E Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.76 – 26.32
Spot Rate : 0.5600
Average : 0.3566

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.76
Bid-YTW : 5.56 %

NEW.PR.C SplitShare Quote: 14.25 – 14.77
Spot Rate : 0.5200
Average : 0.3188

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-06-26
Maturity Price : 13.70
Evaluated at bid price : 14.25
Bid-YTW : 2.02 %

HSB.PR.C Deemed-Retractible Quote: 24.80 – 25.20
Spot Rate : 0.4000
Average : 0.3201

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.80
Bid-YTW : 5.24 %

POW.PR.D Perpetual-Discount Quote: 23.46 – 23.75
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.2120

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-07
Maturity Price : 23.11
Evaluated at bid price : 23.46
Bid-YTW : 5.33 %

TD.PR.I FixedReset Quote: 27.25 – 27.49
Spot Rate : 0.2400
Average : 0.1622

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.25
Bid-YTW : 3.03 %

Market Action

July 6, 2011

Portugal’s downgrade is contagious:

Portugal’s downgrade to junk may stifle corporate bond sales in Europe, killing off a mini- revival in issuance spurred by investor optimism about Greece’s efforts to avoid default.

“The primary window has almost slammed shut just as spectacularly as it had flung open,” said Suki Mann, senior credit strategist at Societe Generale SA in London.

Notes sold by Enel SpA (ENEL), Italy’s largest power operator, and Fiat SpA (F) fell in their first day of trading today, while two issuers pulled deals. Enel and Fiat led 5.4 billion euros ($7.7 billion) of company bond sales in Europe this week, the biggest round of issuance by non-financial borrowers since May, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Ireland may be next!

Ireland’s credit rating may be cut to junk by Moody’s Investors Service after Portugal yesterday lost its investment grade rating, according to analysts.

Moody, which slashed Portugal to Ba2 from Baa1, in April lowered Ireland’s credit rating to the lowest investment grade Baa3 and left country’s outlook on negative.

The ratings company cut Portugal’s rating in part because the nation may not be able to return to debt markets in the second half of 2013. Ireland has been locked out of markets since September, and the yield on 10-year Irish bonds climbed to 12.44 percent today, a euro-area record for the country that agreed to a rescue package with the European Union and International Monetary Fund last November.

Synthetic ETFs are really getting a working-over:

U.K. fraud prosecutors are reviewing how exchange-traded funds are marketed and whether they have the proper tools to prosecute any wrongdoing in the industry, a person directly involved with the probe said.

The Serious Fraud Office, which prosecutes white collar crime, hired a consultant to interview bankers and lawyers to determine whether there is a risk that sales of the products may involve criminal conduct in the future. The Financial Services Authority and the Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee have warned of a lack of transparency in the ETF market.

“From the investor’s point of view, I think there are question marks over whether synthetic ETFs really are appropriate for all types of the retail marketplace,” FSA Chief Executive Officer Hector Sants said June 24.

Concerns about synthetic ETFs were last discussed on PrefBlog when the BoE June 2011 Financial Stability Report focussed on them.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, as PerpetualDiscounts gained 20bp, FixedResets were up 4bp and DeemedRetractibles lost 8bp. Volatility was quite good. Volume was average; Nesbitt scored a shut-out on the highlights table.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.44%, equivalent to 7.07% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield about 5.35% so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread is now about 175bp, a narrowing from the 185bp reported on June 29 due to a decline of PerpetualDiscount yields.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 1.6939 % 2,457.4
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 1.6939 % 3,695.9
Floater 2.46 % 2.23 % 43,728 21.69 4 1.6939 % 2,653.4
OpRet 4.87 % 1.73 % 64,046 0.23 9 0.1290 % 2,443.8
SplitShare 5.23 % 1.32 % 55,913 0.64 6 0.3256 % 2,515.4
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1290 % 2,234.6
Perpetual-Premium 5.70 % 5.26 % 142,980 1.27 13 -0.0226 % 2,084.9
Perpetual-Discount 5.46 % 5.44 % 114,233 14.68 17 0.2042 % 2,191.6
FixedReset 5.17 % 3.17 % 217,935 2.69 57 0.0442 % 2,316.4
Deemed-Retractible 5.10 % 4.84 % 275,383 8.13 47 -0.0787 % 2,155.3
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
GWO.PR.N FixedReset -4.50 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.55
Bid-YTW : 4.31 %
CIU.PR.C FixedReset -1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-06
Maturity Price : 23.02
Evaluated at bid price : 24.58
Bid-YTW : 3.63 %
TDS.PR.C SplitShare 1.07 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-11-15
Maturity Price : 10.00
Evaluated at bid price : 10.42
Bid-YTW : -4.84 %
NA.PR.N FixedReset 1.09 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-08-15
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : 2.75 %
NA.PR.O FixedReset 1.31 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-15
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.70
Bid-YTW : 2.06 %
FTS.PR.E OpRet 1.75 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 27.33
Bid-YTW : 1.73 %
TRI.PR.B Floater 2.75 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-06
Maturity Price : 23.62
Evaluated at bid price : 23.89
Bid-YTW : 2.18 %
PWF.PR.A Floater 2.86 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-06
Maturity Price : 23.14
Evaluated at bid price : 23.40
Bid-YTW : 2.23 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
CM.PR.J Deemed-Retractible 114,655 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 24.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 4.73 %
CM.PR.H Deemed-Retractible 106,596 Called for redemption.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-08-05
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 25.71
Bid-YTW : 2.69 %
BMO.PR.M FixedReset 63,259 Nesbitt crossed 60,000 at 26.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-08-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.21
Bid-YTW : 2.94 %
RY.PR.R FixedReset 38,365 Nesbitt crossed 25,000 at 27.23.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.21
Bid-YTW : 3.04 %
TD.PR.G FixedReset 33,933 Nesbitt crossed 25,000 at 27.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.10
Bid-YTW : 2.97 %
POW.PR.B Perpetual-Discount 28,719 Nesbitt crossed 25,000 at 24.45.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-06
Maturity Price : 24.03
Evaluated at bid price : 24.28
Bid-YTW : 5.52 %
There were 31 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
GWO.PR.N FixedReset Quote: 23.55 – 24.65
Spot Rate : 1.1000
Average : 0.6456

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.55
Bid-YTW : 4.31 %

BAM.PR.O OpRet Quote: 25.64 – 26.29
Spot Rate : 0.6500
Average : 0.4564

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.64
Bid-YTW : 3.72 %

FTS.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 25.76 – 26.23
Spot Rate : 0.4700
Average : 0.3494

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-09-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.76
Bid-YTW : 4.03 %

PWF.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 26.78 – 27.20
Spot Rate : 0.4200
Average : 0.3096

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.78
Bid-YTW : 2.95 %

SLF.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 25.25 – 25.55
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.1987

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 3.84 %

BAM.PR.J OpRet Quote: 27.16 – 27.51
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2562

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-31
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.16
Bid-YTW : 3.52 %

Press Clippings

Why only millionaires should invest in bonds directly

John Heinzl was kind enough to quote me in his Investors’ Clinic column titled Why only millionaires should invest in bonds directly:

Now, it’s true that bond ETFs typically roll over holdings one year before they mature, because at this point these securities are considered money-market instruments. But in an environment of rising interest rates, a bond ETF that follows a sell-before-maturity policy would buy new, higher-coupon bonds sooner than an identical portfolio of bonds that held to maturity, and the higher income would make up for any capital loss incurred as a result of selling early, said James Hymas, a fixed-income expert and president of Hymas Investment Management.

Bond ETFs have several advantages, he points out. Because ETFs buy in volume, they get much better pricing than retail investors could obtain through their broker, and this pricing advantage for most ETFs will outweigh the management expense ratio. Bond ETFs also provide instant diversification. The notion that bond ETFs don’t mature and should therefore be avoided makes no sense, he said.

“Anybody investing less than $1-million in bonds should do it through ETFs,” Mr. Hymas said. “If you have more than $1-million, then you can talk about buying individual issues, but if you have less than $1-million you’re either going to have poor diversification or poor pricing, perhaps both.”

The Globe’s website shows one comment worth addressing:

I disagree entirely. A bond costs $5K to buy and nothing to hold. For 70K you can set up a 7 year ladder with one bond maturing every 6 months. You hold every bond until it matures, reinvesting each matured bond with all the accumulated interest in the account in a new 7 year bond. When you retire you can use the interest payments as income if you like. You will earn the same as a second OAP, without the clawback.

If you don’t have 70K yet, you buy one $5K 7 year bond every 6 months for the next 7 years to set up.

It is not rocket science, I have been doing it for 15 years. The pros like Hymas hate it because, apart from the small fee when you buy a bond, you pay no fees at all.

A Bond ETF will have a management expense ratio of 25-35bp. The bid-offer spread on seven year bonds purchased in amount of $5,000 will almost certainly exceed this. Additionally, there will be costs associated with further trading, unless you spend amounts exactly equal to your coupon income.

Another commenter suggested:

It is certainly possible to create your own bond ladder as you describe, and there are benefits to that. But the costs are also hidden by the lack of transparency and liquidity in the smaller denominations. Perhaps $1M is overkill, but probably $25,000 is a practical trade-off between price/cost and yield.

I just checked a broker screen and spreads on medium-term corporates are about 35bp for quantities of $1,000. Sorry – I don’t know precisely where the price breaks are, or how much better pricing is at the 25,000 level.

I suggested $1-million because then you can buy 20 bonds in lots of $50,000. The ETF also has the advantage of greater liquidity, as well as freeing you from the tender mercies of your custodial broker’s bond desk should you need to sell, which are often not very tender.

Additionally, note that most retail bond desks will make only a very limited number of names available to investors – proper diversification of a bond portfolio will always be very difficult for retail, even those who do have $1-million.

For more on this theme – which addresses in more detail the ladder / ETF decision – see my March 2010 publication from the Advisors’ Edge Report.

Update, 2011-7-8: One commenter made an excellent point:

And have you ever tried to sell a bond? Sure, if you’ve laddered everything nicely you shouldn’t need to. But sometimes $hit happens and you need money unexpectedly. I’ve tried twice, once through W’house, once through e-trade. It took them days to get back to me with a (horrible) price, by which time I’d raised cash elsewhere. If you’re buying bonds directly, be really, really sure you’ll hold them to maturity.

One common theme in the comment is the view that holding bonds directly is better because “Transaction fees and the spread are a one time cost whereas the MER is forever.” In fact, transaction fees and the spread are a recurring cost, paid anew every time you roll a rung of the ladder. And, as stated in my post above, the spread for medium term corporates in small quantities at one broker is about 35bp per annum – when you express the spread as a difference in yield.

Update, 2011-7-7: See also discussion at Financial Webring Forum.

Market Action

July 5, 2011

FixedResets and new issuers got some ink in the Globe:

BCE Inc. (BCE-T38.220.230.61%), which has long history with these shares, is one of the latest firms to tap into this demand, closing a $345-million offering on Tuesday. These shares pay a fixed yield of 4.15 per cent for the first five years, and then investors have the choice to either take a rate equal to the Government of Canada 5-year yield plus 1.88 per cent, or a floating three-month T-bill rate plus 1.88 per cent.

Yet BCE isn’t alone. Intact Financial also just sold $225-million of these securities, as did Canaccord Financial. These two issues were a bit more surprising because both deals were the first time these firms offered this type of security.

Still, it makes a lot of sense. Much like Intact and Canaccord, firms such as GMP Capital and Bell Alliant also recently sold their first issue of rate reset preferred shares. If sales continue to be strong, don’t be surprised if more first-time issuers jump on the bandwagon.

Moody’s says Portugal is junk after a four-notch downgrade:

Moody’s Investors Service on Tuesday cut Portugal’s credit rating by four levels to Ba2, two notches into junk territory, saying there is great risk the country will need a second round of official financing before it can return to capital markets.

It was a mixed day on the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts down 4bp, FixedResets winning 15bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 5bp. Volatility was muted. Volume was average and dominated by FixedResets – perhaps due to portfolio reshuffling with the closing of the BCE.PR.K new issue.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.4394 % 2,416.5
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.4394 % 3,634.4
Floater 2.51 % 2.29 % 41,405 21.50 4 -0.4394 % 2,609.2
OpRet 4.86 % 2.54 % 64,684 0.24 9 0.2017 % 2,440.7
SplitShare 5.24 % 1.95 % 55,062 0.64 6 -0.0400 % 2,507.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2017 % 2,231.7
Perpetual-Premium 5.67 % 5.17 % 140,058 2.14 13 0.0777 % 2,085.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.45 % 5.47 % 114,563 14.65 17 -0.0423 % 2,187.1
FixedReset 5.16 % 3.20 % 218,541 2.69 57 0.1547 % 2,315.4
Deemed-Retractible 5.08 % 4.86 % 276,298 8.15 47 0.0482 % 2,157.0
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.B Floater -1.62 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-05
Maturity Price : 18.84
Evaluated at bid price : 18.84
Bid-YTW : 2.80 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset 1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.01
Bid-YTW : 3.64 %
HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 1.63 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.90
Bid-YTW : 5.09 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
MFC.PR.D FixedReset 237,393 RBC crossed blocks of 149,900 and 79,900, both at 27.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.22
Bid-YTW : 3.54 %
TD.PR.S FixedReset 212,291 RBC crossed blocks of 150,000 shares, 30,000 and 25,000, all at 26.15.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.15
Bid-YTW : 3.15 %
RY.PR.Y FixedReset 106,996 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 27.57.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-11-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.52
Bid-YTW : 3.18 %
RY.PR.I FixedReset 106,463 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 26.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.17
Bid-YTW : 3.37 %
BNS.PR.P FixedReset 105,784 TD crossed blocks of 23,900 and 75,000, both at 25.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.88
Bid-YTW : 2.81 %
MFC.PR.A OpRet 85,929 TD crossed 75,000 at 25.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2015-12-18
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.51
Bid-YTW : 3.66 %
There were 31 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 22.75 – 23.60
Spot Rate : 0.8500
Average : 0.6469

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-05
Maturity Price : 22.49
Evaluated at bid price : 22.75
Bid-YTW : 2.29 %

FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.00 – 24.59
Spot Rate : 0.5900
Average : 0.3873

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-05
Maturity Price : 23.52
Evaluated at bid price : 24.00
Bid-YTW : 5.14 %

POW.PR.D Perpetual-Discount Quote: 23.76 – 24.08
Spot Rate : 0.3200
Average : 0.2103

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-05
Maturity Price : 23.31
Evaluated at bid price : 23.76
Bid-YTW : 5.26 %

BAM.PR.N Perpetual-Discount Quote: 21.63 – 21.93
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2008

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-05
Maturity Price : 21.63
Evaluated at bid price : 21.63
Bid-YTW : 5.53 %

BAM.PR.H OpRet Quote: 25.21 – 25.44
Spot Rate : 0.2300
Average : 0.1608

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.21
Bid-YTW : 2.54 %

BNS.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 24.88 – 25.50
Spot Rate : 0.6200
Average : 0.5526

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.88
Bid-YTW : 3.68 %

Issue Comments

BCE.PR.K Firm on Excellent Volume

BCE Inc. has announced:

that it has closed its previously announced public offering of Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AK (series AK preferred shares), by a syndicate of underwriters led by CIBC World Markets Inc., RBC Dominion Securities Inc. and Scotia Capital Inc. As a result of the underwriters exercising in full their option to purchase an additional 1,800,000 series AK preferred shares, BCE issued 13,800,000 series AK preferred shares for gross proceeds of $345 million. The series AK preferred shares will begin trading on the TSX today under the symbol BCE.PR.K.

The series AK preferred shares will pay on a quarterly basis (with the first quarterly dividend to be paid September 30, 2011), for the initial fixed rate period ending December 30, 2016, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE, a fixed cash dividend based on an annual fixed dividend rate of 4.15%. The dividend rate will be reset on December 31, 2016 and every five years thereafter at a rate equal to the 5-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 1.88%. The series AK preferred shares will be redeemable by the issuer on December 31, 2016 and on December 31 every five years thereafter, in accordance with their terms.

Holders of the series AK preferred shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AL, (series AL preferred shares) subject to certain conditions, on December 31, 2016 and on December 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of the series AL preferred shares will be entitled to receive quarterly floating adjustable cash dividends as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE, at a rate equal to the three-month Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 1.88%.

The net proceeds of this offering will be used for general corporate purposes.

BCE.PR.K is a FixedReset, 4.15%+188, announced June 20. It is tracked by HIMIPref™, but has been relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

BCE.PR.K traded 558,795 shares today in a range of 24.74-99 before closing at 24.98-99, 8×17. Vital statisics are:

BCE.PR.K FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-05
Maturity Price : 23.13
Evaluated at bid price : 24.98
Bid-YTW : 4.02 %
Issue Comments

FCS.PR.B Credit Quality to Deteriorate

Faircourt Asset Management has announced:

that 164,456 Combined Units (consisting of one Trust Unit and one Preferred Security) and 1,399,639 Trust Units (without matching Preferred Securities) were submitted for redemption on May 31, 2011. Securityholders who tendered Combined Units for redemption will be entitled to receive $17.3310 per Combined Unit, which is equal to $7.3173, being the Net Asset Value per Trust Unit calculated using a three day volume weighted average price for exchange-traded securities held by the Trust, determined as of June 30, 2011 less costs of funding the redemption, including commissions, plus the $10.00 principal amount of the Preferred Security, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon to but excluding July 8, 2011 (the “Payment Date”). Securityholders who submitted unmatched Trust Units will receive $7.3173 per Trust Unit. Payment in respect of the redemptions of Combined Units and unmatched Trust Units will be made in full on the Payment Date.

The Manager also announced that effective June 30, 2011, NAV per Trust Unit has been reduced by $0.21 as a result of a corporate action involving one of the Trust’s investments having been improperly reflected in the NAV.

Faircourt Split Trust is an odd beast among Split Share Corporations because the number of preferred shares outstanding is not set equal to the number of capital shares. The unmatched retraction of 1,399,639 Trust Units represents over one-quarter of the 5,302,037 Trust Units outstanding on 2010-12-31.

The Asset Coverage on 2010-12-31 was about 1.57:1; applying the May 31 retraction on a pro-forma basis as of that date results in a pro-forma Asset Coverage of about 1.42:1.

FCS.PR.B was last mentioned on PrefBlog when it was exchanged from FCS.PR.A. FCS.PR.B is tracked by HIMIPref™, but is relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

Market Action

July 4, 2011

Nortel’s carcass is worth big bucks:

Apple Inc. (AAPL) joined with rivals Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Research in Motion Ltd. (RIM) to outbid Google Inc. (GOOG) for a patent portfolio from Nortel Networks Corp. and gain rights to technologies for mobile phones and tablet computers.

The group, which also includes Sony Corp. (6758), Ericsson AB and EMC Corp., agreed to pay $4.5 billion in cash for the assets, Ontario-based Nortel said in a statement. The companies aim to complete the sale this quarter pending approval from U.S. and Canadian courts, it said.

The purchase will give Apple, RIM and their bidding partners control over more than 6,000 patents and applications that cover wireless and Internet technologies. The winning offer came after several rounds of bidding and was five times the $900 million Google had offered before the auction for Nortel’s remaining intellectual property.

Nortel, which filed for bankruptcy in 2009, fetched more for the patents than the $3 billion it had previously raised by selling almost all its businesses. RIM, maker of the BlackBerry smartphone, will pay about $770 million for its share of the patents, the Waterloo, Ontario-based company said in a statement. Ericsson will pay $340 million, the Stockholm-based networking-equipment maker said. Steve Dowling, a spokesman for Apple, declined to comment beyond the Nortel statement.

The Greek problem has been papered over – at least for now:

The euro area approved its share of a 12 billion-euro ($17.4 billion) aid payment for Greece and pledged to complete work in the coming weeks on a second rescue package for the cash-strapped nation to prevent a default and contagion.

Finance ministers agreed to disburse 8.7 billion euros of loans under last year’s 110 billion-euro bailout, rewarding Greek Premier George Papandreou for pushing an extra austerity plan through parliament. The International Monetary Fund is due to provide the rest of the July aid installment, the fifth under the 2010 package.

The spotlight now turns to a second bailout to which banks and insurers plan to contribute following German demands for taxpayer relief. Euro-area governments and investors will provide 70 percent of new aid that may total as much as 85 billion euros, with the IMF offering the rest, Thomas Wieser, an Austrian Finance Ministry official, said on June 30.

S&P will likely label a Greek term extension as a selective default:

In summary, the growing risk that the Hellenic Republic might engage in a distressed debt restructuring was one of the reasons we lowered its rating on June 13 (see, “Long-term Sovereign Rating On Greece Cut To ‘CCC’; Outlook
Negative”). While we would likely view the FBF proposal, if it proceeds in its current form, as an effective default, we recognize that it is just one of a number of proposals attempting to address the Greek government’s 2011-2014 financing needs and the sustainability of its future debt burden. We
understand that the FBF proposal may change, and it is possible that it could take a form that results in a different rating outcome. Regardless of whether the current FBF proposal is implemented, however, we continue to believe the Hellenic Republic’s uncertain ability to implement the revised EU/IMF program
is a key risk weighing on its credit standing.

This has European shorts in a knot:

That may leave the European Central Bank unable to accept Greek government debt as collateral, impairing the lifeline it has provided the country’s banks.

“It sends all the officials and banks back to drawing board to think something new,” said Christoph Rieger, head of fixed-income strategy at Commerzbank AG in Frankfurt. “The ECB is saying it won’t accept debt in a default. Someone needs to give in — either Germany or the ratings agencies or the ECB. One of three will have to compromise.”

Despite all this, Greek notes had a good day:

Greek two-year note yield dropped below 26 percent for the first time since June 14.

Greek two-year yields slid 73 points to 26.11 percent, at one point dipping to 25.76 percent. The cost of insuring Greek debt against default rose four basis points to 1,865, signaling 80 percent odds the country will miss a bond payment in five years. The Markit iTraxx SovX Western Europe Index of credit- default swaps on 15 governments climbed four basis points to 222. The euro slipped 0.1 percent against the dollar and the yen.

There’s a new chapter in the Sino-Forest saga:

Sino-Forest Corp. (TRE), the Chinese tree- plantation operator accused by a short seller of overstating timber holdings, climbed in Toronto after Wellington Management Co. said it owned 11.5 percent of the company.

Sino-Forest rose as much as 56 percent after the Boston- based investment firm said in a regulatory filing it held 28.3 million shares as of June 30. Wellington, which manages $663 billion, held 79,700 Sino-Forest shares, or 0.03 percent, as of Dec. 31, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

I just finished reading The Taste of Conquest by Michael Krondl. Excellent, and a worthy companion to William Bernstein’s A Splendid Exchange.

After our beloved mayor turned down a chance to say hello to umpteen thousand tourists with deep pockets, another councillor suggested cutting off funds for the city’s #2 tourist event – even if it means #1 will become collateral damage. Meanwhile, crappy pseudo-festivals organized by the well-connected get megabucks. Just what exactly do we need to do in this city to get a competent, pro-business administration?

The month – and the quarter – started off on an upbeat for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts gaining 4bp, FixedResets up 11bp and DeemedRetractibeswinning 21bp. Decent volatility, volume was average. RBC had a nice day.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.7310 % 2,427.2
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.7310 % 3,650.4
Floater 2.49 % 2.29 % 41,234 21.50 4 -0.7310 % 2,620.7
OpRet 4.87 % 2.80 % 65,221 1.82 9 0.1762 % 2,435.7
SplitShare 5.24 % 1.94 % 55,392 0.64 6 0.0579 % 2,508.3
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1762 % 2,227.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.68 % 5.08 % 140,533 1.28 13 0.1922 % 2,083.7
Perpetual-Discount 5.45 % 5.47 % 118,489 14.66 17 0.0398 % 2,188.0
FixedReset 5.17 % 3.26 % 217,727 2.69 57 0.1090 % 2,311.8
Deemed-Retractible 5.08 % 4.86 % 277,383 8.14 47 0.2105 % 2,155.9
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater -2.99 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-04
Maturity Price : 22.49
Evaluated at bid price : 22.75
Bid-YTW : 2.29 %
IGM.PR.B Perpetual-Premium 1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.45
Bid-YTW : 5.57 %
BAM.PR.O OpRet 1.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.77
Bid-YTW : 3.44 %
CM.PR.I Deemed-Retractible 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.88
Bid-YTW : 4.74 %
BAM.PR.R FixedReset 1.37 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-04
Maturity Price : 23.42
Evaluated at bid price : 25.85
Bid-YTW : 4.48 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TD.PR.S FixedReset 355,342 RBC crossed four blocks: 275,000 shares, 25,000 shares, 30,000 and 20,000, all at 26.15.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.12
Bid-YTW : 3.21 %
TD.PR.Q Deemed-Retractible 246,500 RBC crossed 240,000 at 26.29.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 26.40
Bid-YTW : 4.69 %
BNS.PR.T FixedReset 130,550 RBC crossed four blocks: two of 50,000 each, 15,000 shares and 10,000, all at 27.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.19
Bid-YTW : 2.84 %
MFC.PR.D FixedReset 101,202 RBC crossed 99,900 at 27.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.12
Bid-YTW : 3.68 %
RY.PR.R FixedReset 83,900 TD crossed 69,900 at 27.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.20
Bid-YTW : 3.05 %
SLF.PR.F FixedReset 79,600 RBC bought 25,000 from Scotia at 26.90, then crossed 41,900 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.80
Bid-YTW : 3.49 %
There were 31 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 22.75 – 23.40
Spot Rate : 0.6500
Average : 0.4243

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-04
Maturity Price : 22.49
Evaluated at bid price : 22.75
Bid-YTW : 2.29 %

BNS.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 24.85 – 25.50
Spot Rate : 0.6500
Average : 0.4787

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.85
Bid-YTW : 3.69 %

SLF.PR.F FixedReset Quote: 26.80 – 27.24
Spot Rate : 0.4400
Average : 0.3017

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.80
Bid-YTW : 3.49 %

TRP.PR.B FixedReset Quote: 25.18 – 25.51
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.1928

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-04
Maturity Price : 23.31
Evaluated at bid price : 25.18
Bid-YTW : 3.46 %

TRP.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 25.50 – 25.88
Spot Rate : 0.3800
Average : 0.2549

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-07-04
Maturity Price : 23.35
Evaluated at bid price : 25.50
Bid-YTW : 3.68 %

TCA.PR.Y Perpetual-Premium Quote: 50.10 – 50.39
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1941

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-05
Maturity Price : 50.00
Evaluated at bid price : 50.10
Bid-YTW : 5.37 %

Issue Comments

LSC.PR.C: Partial Call for Redemption

Lifeco Split Corporation, sponsored by Scotia Managed Companies, has announced:

that it has called 34,146 Preferred Shares for cash redemption on July 29, 2011 (in accordance with the Company’s Articles) representing approximately 11.435% of the outstanding Preferred Shares as a result of the special annual retraction of 68,292 Capital Shares by the holders thereof. The Preferred Shares shall be redeemed on a pro rata basis, so that each holder of Preferred Shares of record on July 28, 2011 will have approximately 11.435% of their Preferred Shares redeemed. The redemption price for the Preferred Shares will be $36.84 per share.

Holders of Preferred Shares that are on record for dividends but have been called for redemption will be entitled to receive dividends thereon which have been declared but remain unpaid up to but not including July 29, 2011.

Payment of the amount due to holders of Preferred Shares will be made by the Company on July 29, 2011. From and after July 29, 2011 the holders of Preferred Shares that have been called for redemption will not be entitled to dividends or to exercise any right in respect of such shares except to receive the amount due on redemption.

Lifeco Split Corporation Inc. is a mutual fund corporation created to hold a portfolio of common shares of selected publicly listed Canadian life insurance companies. Capital Shares and Preferred Shares of Lifeco Split Corporation Inc. are listed for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols LSC and LSC.PR.C respectively.

LSC.PR.C was last mentioned on PrefBlog when there was a partial redemption and change of terms last year. LSC.PR.C is not tracked by HIMIPref™.