May PrefLetter Released!

May 16th, 2011

The May, 2011, edition of PrefLetter has been released and is now available for purchase as the “Previous edition”. Those who subscribe for a full year receive the “Previous edition” as a bonus.

The May edition contains an appendix discussing the theory and practice of dividend capture strategies, particularly as applied to FixedResets.

PrefLetter may now be purchased by all Canadian residents.

Until further notice, the “Previous Edition” will refer to the May, 2011, issue, while the “Next Edition” will be the June, 2011, issue, scheduled to be prepared as of the close June 10 and eMailed to subscribers prior to market-opening on June 13.

PrefLetter is intended for long term investors seeking issues to buy-and-hold. At least one recommendation from each of the major preferred share sectors is included and discussed.

Note: My verbosity has grown by such leaps and bounds that it is no longer possible to deliver PrefLetter as an eMail attachment – it’s just too big for my software! Instead, I have sent passwords – click on the link in your eMail and your copy will download.

Note: The PrefLetter website has a Subscriber Download Feature. If you have not received your copy, try it!

Note: PrefLetter eMails sometimes runs afoul of spam filters. If you have not received your copy within fifteen minutes of a release notice such as this one, please double check your (company’s) spam filtering policy and your spam repository – there are some hints in the post Sympatico Spam Filters out of Control. If it’s not there, contact me and I’ll get you your copy … somehow!

Note: There have been scattered complaints regarding inability to open PrefLetter in Acrobat Reader, despite my practice of including myself on the subscription list and immediately checking the copy received. I have had the occasional difficulty reading US Government documents, which I was able to resolve by downloading and installing the latest version of Adobe Reader. Also, note that so far, all complaints have been from users of Yahoo Mail. Try saving it to disk first, before attempting to open it.

Note: There have been other scattered complaints that double-clicking on the links in the “PrefLetter Download” email results in a message that the password has already been used. I have been able to reproduce this problem in my own eMail software … the problem is double-clicking. What happens is the first click opens the link and the second click finds that the password has already been used and refuses to work properly. So the moral of the story is: Don’t be a dick! Single Click!

DGS.PR.A Annual Report 2010

May 15th, 2011

Dividend Growth Split Corp. has released its Annual Report to December 31, 2010.

DGS / DGS.PR.A Performance
Instrument One
Year
Three
Years
Whole Unit +11.4% +1.3%
DGS.PR.A +5.4% +5.3%
DGS +19.5% -1.7%
S&P/TSX Composite Index +17.6% +2.1%

I think a dividend-tilting index would have been a more appropriate benchmark for this fund than the Composite, but we’ll let that go.

Figures of interest are:

MER: 1.22% of the whole unit value

Average Net Assets: The fund more than doubled in size during 2010, making this calculation a little tricky; the value is required in order to calculate portfolio yield. The Net Asset Value at year end was $79.0-million, compared to $36.1-million a year prior, so call it an average of $57.6-million. Total Preferred Share Distribution was $1.60-million, at $0.525/unit implies an average of 3.05-million units, at an average NAV of (18.17 + 17.99) / 2 = 18.08, so call it $55.1-million. This is good agreement, call the average NAV $56-million.

Underlying Portfolio Yield: Dividends and interest received of $2.24-million divided by average net assets of 56-million is 4.0%.

Income Coverage: Dividends, Securities Lending Income & Interest of $2.24-million less expenses of $1.55-million is $0.7-million, to cover preferred dividends of $1.6-million is 44%.

BNA Annual Report

May 15th, 2011

BAM Split Corp. has not posted its 2010 Annual Report on its website, so investors must go to SEDAR to get it; it was filed on 2010-12-17.

The performance reporting is rather boring, since only the various preferred share issues (BNA.PR.B, BNA.PR.C, BNA.PR.D and BNA.PR.E) are listed; the returns for the capital units are not reported, nor is the return of the underlying portfolio – which is entirely BAM.A plus or minus a bit of cash drag anyway. The performance table will therefore not be reproduced here.

Figures of interest are:

MER: (excluding dividends on preferred shares, issue costs and Class A Preferred Share redemption premium) 0.0%. You don’t see that number very often! A more precise calculation from the Income Statement shows that the expenses totalled $333,000, or about 2bp on assets.

The expenses are wel itemized, however, and are a delight for voyeurs. I found the Listing Fees of $72,000 and Rating Fees of $20,000 to be most interesting.

Average Net Assets: There’s no point calculating this, since Portfolio Yield can be estimated directly from BAM.A

Underlying Portfolio Yield: Given the fund’s portfolio composition and investment policy, deviations from the raw yield on BAM.A will not be material. This is currently 1.60%

Income Coverage: Dividends & Interest of $28.8-million less expenses (before amortization of issue costs) of $0.3-million is $28.5-million, to cover preferred dividends of $19.9-million is 143%.

May PrefLetter Now In Preparation

May 14th, 2011

The markets have closed and the May edition of PrefLetter is now being prepared.

PrefLetter is the monthly newsletter recommending individual issues of preferred shares to subscribers. There is at least one recommendation from every major type of preferred share with investment-grade constituents. The recommendations are taylored for “buy-and-hold” investors.

The May edition will contain an appendix discussing Dividend Capture and its relationship to the FixedReset sector.

Those taking an annual subscription to PrefLetter receive a discount on viewing of my seminars.

PrefLetter is now available to all residents of Canada.

The May issue will be eMailed to clients and available for single-issue purchase with immediate delivery prior to the opening bell on Monday. I will write another post when the new issue has been uploaded to the server … so watch this space carefully if you intend to order “Next Issue” or “Previous Issue”! Until then, the “Next Issue” is the May issue.

May 13, 2011

May 13th, 2011

Well, let’s think about bankruptcy … banks are no longer allowed to go bust … countries are no longer allowed to go bust … now, it would appear, power companies can no longer go bust:

Japan’s government will provide financial aid for Tokyo Electric Power Co. to protect the utility from bankruptcy as it pays compensation to those affected by the worst nuclear disaster in 25 years.

Japan’s government will create a body to handle claims made against Tepco, as the company is called, and will issue bonds to fund them, according to a statement released today after a meeting of Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s cabinet.

“Our requirement is that the company continues to operate as a listed company and continue to provide a stable supply of power,” Trade Minister Banri Kaieda told reporters after the statement was released. He said Tepco bondholders rights will be maintained.

Power companies that operate nuclear stations will be required to pay into the compensation organization being set up by the government, according to the statement.

Tepco will be monitored by the government as a condition for aid to ensure full compensation will be paid to those affected by the disaster, Kaieda said earlier this week.

“Eventually, the matter could become one of how to share the burden between Tepco and the government, but it will be something to be decided in the distant future,” [Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio] Edano said.

Still, it hasn’t done the Samurai market any harm:

HSBC’s unit HSBC Bank Plc sold 108.2 billion yen of five- year, 0.91 percent bonds priced to yield 31 basis points more than the yen swap rate, and 35.2 billion yen of floating-rate notes that pay 46 basis points over the three-month London interbank offered rate, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The bank had planned to sell at least 50 billion yen of notes, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because the information is private.

Lehman defaulted on 195 billion yen of Samurai bonds when it filed for bankruptcy in September 2008, a collapse that froze global credit markets and curbed investor demand for all but the safest government debt. Today’s sale is the biggest without a sovereign guarantee since Citigroup Inc. sold 186.5 billion yen of three-year, 2.66 percent Samurai bonds to individual investors in June 2008, Bloomberg data show.

US inflation ticked up a bit:

The cost of living in the U.S. rose in April, led by increases in food and fuel costs that are starting to filter down to other goods and services.

The consumer-price index increased 0.4 percent, matching the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News and following a 0.5 percent advance in March, figures from the Labor Department showed today in Washington. Excluding volatile food and energy, the so-called core gauge rose 0.2 percent, also as projected.

Oh, the joys of doing business in kleptocracies run by thugs:

Yahoo! Inc. fell for a third day as signs of tension with Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. raised speculation it may benefit less from part ownership of China’s largest e-commerce provider.

Concerns surfaced after a May 10 Yahoo filing that said Alibaba Group spun off the lucrative Alipay online-payments business, and then deepened the next two days amid conflicting statements from Yahoo and Alibaba over Alibaba Group’s disclosure of the transfer.

Yahoo, based in Sunnyvale, California, fell as much as 7.1 percent to $15.96 in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. It has lost 10 percent since May 10, when it said the entire equity of Alipay had been transferred to a company controlled by Alibaba Chief Executive Officer Jack Ma.

Alibaba was paid about 300 million yuan ($46 million) for Alipay by a company controlled by Ma, Caing.com reported today, citing public company registry data. Alibaba’s Spelich declined to comment on the report.

Alipay has a value of $5 billion, Brett Harriss, an analyst at Gabelli & Co., wrote in a report yesterday.

The Bank of Canada has released a discussion paper by David Bolder, Simon Deeley titled The Canadian Debt-Strategy Model: An Overview of the Principal Elements:

As part of managing a debt portfolio, debt managers face the challenging task of choosing a strategy that minimizes the cost of debt, subject to limitations on risk. The Bank of Canada provides debt-management analysis and advice to the Government of Canada to assist in this task, with the Canadian debt-strategy model being developed to help in this regard. The authors outline the main elements of the model, which include: cost and risk measures, inflation-linked debt, optimization techniques, the framework used to model the government’s funding requirement, the sensitivity of results to the choice of joint stochastic macroeconomic term-structure model, the effects of shocks to macroeconomic and term-structure variables and changes to their long-term values, and the relationship between issuance yield and issuance amount. Emphasis is placed on the degree to which changes to the formulation of model elements impact key results. The model is an important part of the decision-making process for the determination of the government’s debt strategy. However, it remains one of many tools that are available to debt managers and is to be used in conjunction with the judgment of an experienced debt manager.

I mentioned Jonathan Weill’s excellent column Greeks Blaming Speculators Sure Sign of Panic yesterday and now there’s reason to mention it again, now that Irshad Manji has written a column in the Globe titled The paranoid can’t handle the truth:

Routine, reactionary denial is a dead end. When conspiracy-peddling persists, what can ever be true? Indeed, the very idea of truth loses meaning. Which is why I can’t ascribe the popular label “truthers” to those who claim that 9/11 was itself an inside job.

It’s easy to dismiss the hyperventilating as simple nuttiness. But the nutters have an outsized impact on shared values, a crucial aspect of the glue that holds societies together. The decibel level of conspiracy merchants, amplified by the explosion of media platforms through which to express themselves, infects our very capacity for common purpose – and our human need for hope.

Is there a solution? I’d argue that students should be taught to think not just critically, but also “generatively,” so they can rationally reassemble the pieces of what they’ve just ripped apart. Thinking critically enables us to question the information we’re being fed, and that’s a good thing. But what then? Unless we can reason our way to factual accuracy, critical thinking easily degenerates into emotionalism – conflating emotion with evidence. Not a good thing.

Americans, for starters, should ask at what point Ronald Reagan’s adage of “trust but verify” encounters its corollary – “verified, now trust.”

Without insisting on each of these halves, citizens in any society can’t achieve a consensus that’s whole enough to move on to new challenges. Blowhards will keep poking holes in old news, falling through those holes and toward a pit where believing in nothing becomes the hallmark of truth. Sounds to me like a lie.

This is an interesting counterpoint to Jonathan Weill’s observatins:

For instance, the first paragraph of the article said euro- area finance ministers and European Commission officials had scheduled a secret meeting for that night in Luxembourg. That same day, a spokesman for Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker, who is chairman of the euro area’s council of finance ministers, told reporters for several news outlets that there was no meeting and that this part of the Spiegel story was wrong. Actually such a meeting did occur on May 6. The spokesman, Guy Schuller, later conceded he had lied.

Asked to explain why, Schuller told the Wall Street Journal that “I was told to say there was no meeting,” and that “we had certain necessities to consider.” The euro was falling on the Spiegel report and “there was a very good reason to deny that the meeting was taking place,” he said, namely “self- preservation.” Besides, he said, when Juncker says something to the markets, “nobody seems to believe it.”

And let’s not even get into Spend-Every-Penny’s blase dismissal of the Junior Republicans’ campaign pledge on the deficit.

Ms. Manji makes good points, but she ignores the other side of the equation. A world in which lying has become acceptable is a fertile ground for conspiracy-theory wingnuts.

A relatively quiet day on the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts up 10bp, FixedResets gaining 3bp and DeemedRetractibles basically flat. There were two entries in the Performance Highlights tables, both MFC issues which went ex-Dividend today. Volume was low, although there were some pockets of size.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1174 % 2,447.1
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1174 % 3,680.4
Floater 2.46 % 2.26 % 37,982 21.61 4 0.1174 % 2,642.2
OpRet 4.87 % 3.50 % 62,253 0.45 9 -0.0445 % 2,420.0
SplitShare 5.19 % -1.70 % 61,775 0.59 6 0.0420 % 2,507.6
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0445 % 2,212.9
Perpetual-Premium 5.74 % 5.21 % 130,728 1.01 9 -0.0176 % 2,063.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.53 % 5.55 % 121,482 14.51 15 0.1016 % 2,150.5
FixedReset 5.14 % 3.26 % 198,139 2.89 57 0.0266 % 2,311.0
Deemed-Retractible 5.18 % 4.92 % 294,823 8.14 53 -0.0006 % 2,120.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible 1.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.45
Bid-YTW : 6.32 %
MFC.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 1.36 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.15
Bid-YTW : 6.09 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
RY.PR.R FixedReset 165,735 Desjardins crossed two blocks of 79,500 each at 27.02. These were 26 minutes apart, so it’s possible that it was the same 79,500 shares.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.03
Bid-YTW : 3.26 %
CM.PR.E Deemed-Retractible 153,840 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 25.50. RBC crossed blocks of 30,000 and 20,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-11-30
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.46
Bid-YTW : 4.39 %
GWO.PR.G Deemed-Retractible 113,661 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 24.45.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.45
Bid-YTW : 5.58 %
CM.PR.J Deemed-Retractible 65,059 TD bought 10,000 from National at 24.30, then crossed 25,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.25
Bid-YTW : 4.91 %
SLF.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 63,060 RBC crossed 25,000 at 22.96; Desjardins crossed 30,800 at 22.93.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.90
Bid-YTW : 5.92 %
BNS.PR.Q FixedReset 57,991 Desjardins crossed 55,000 at 26.22.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-11-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : 3.04 %
There were 25 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
CM.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 27.81 – 28.44
Spot Rate : 0.6300
Average : 0.4247

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.81
Bid-YTW : 3.00 %

PWF.PR.G Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.16 – 25.49
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2205

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-08-16
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.16
Bid-YTW : 4.27 %

BAM.PR.M Perpetual-Discount Quote: 21.75 – 22.06
Spot Rate : 0.3100
Average : 0.2074

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-05-13
Maturity Price : 21.46
Evaluated at bid price : 21.75
Bid-YTW : 5.52 %

NA.PR.O FixedReset Quote: 27.50 – 27.75
Spot Rate : 0.2500
Average : 0.1660

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-17
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.50
Bid-YTW : 2.95 %

IAG.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 27.10 – 28.15
Spot Rate : 1.0500
Average : 0.9987

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.10
Bid-YTW : 3.21 %

IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.21 – 22.40
Spot Rate : 0.1900
Average : 0.1393

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.21
Bid-YTW : 6.14 %

Ottawa Issues Covered Bond Consultation Paper

May 13th, 2011

Ogilvy Renault has reported Canadian Covered Bond Legislation Consultation Paper Released:

Following the Canadian Government’s announcement in its 2010 budget of its intention to introduce a legislative framework for covered bonds, the Department of Finance yesterday released its much anticipated consultation paper on the proposed framework.

In the consultation paper, the Government reiterates its objective of ensuring financial institutions have access to covered bonds as a funding source. It also acknowledges the increased importance of covered bonds to Canadian banks in recent years with issuances by Canadian financial institutions having increased to over $30 billion since the first covered bonds were issued by a Canadian bank in 2007. Further, the Government recognizes that the stability of financial institutions and the financial sector can be enhanced by providing funding options that are robust under stress and that a legislative framework for covered bonds will benefit Canadians.

It this wasn’t a PrefLetter Weekend, I’d be spending a lot more time on this … but I’ll have to leave that until later. From a quick glance, it does not appear as if Bankers’ Acceptances are intended to be covered by the legislation – they should be!

Covered Bonds were last discussed in the post US Covered Bond Legislation Moving Forward. A previous article discussed the question of BAs or BDNs: What’s the Difference?.

Hat tip to Assiduous Reader GA, who brought the Ogilvy Renault article to my attention.

Update, 2011-5-25: The consultation period ends 2011-6-10.

DGS.PR.A: Private Placement

May 13th, 2011

Dividend Growth Split Corp has announced:

that the board of directors has approved a private placement of 468,480 preferred shares at $10.30. The private placement is being made in order to maintain an equal number of outstanding preferred shares and class A shares of Dividend Growth Split Corp. following its merger with Brompton Equity Split Corp.

The closing of the private placement, as well as the merger, is expected to take place on May 18, 2011, subject to regulatory approvals. As a result of the private placement, there will be no requirement for Brompton Equity Split Corp. to redeem any of its class A shares, as more fully described in the joint management information circular of Brompton Equity Split Corp. and Dividend Growth Split Corp. dated March 11, 2011.

Based on the April 28, 2011 net asset values, the class A share exchange ratio for the merger is 1.493584 Dividend Growth Split Corp. class A shares for each Brompton Equity Split Corp. class A share. After giving effect to the private placement and the merger, Dividend Growth Split Corp. will have 6,374,149 class A shares and preferred shares outstanding.

I find it rather odd that the private placement was necessary: the implication is that a large number of preferred shareholders retracted at $10 rather than selling into the market at a higher price.

DGS.PR.A was last mentioned on PrefBlog when the merger and term extension were approved. DGS.PR.A is tracked by HIMIPref™ but is relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

May 12, 2011

May 12th, 2011

Foreclosures are down in the States, but it’s not really good news:

Foreclosure filings in the U.S. fell 34 percent last month from a year earlier as lenders already swamped with seized homes delayed action on thousands of additional delinquent mortgages, RealtyTrac Inc. said.

A total of 219,258 properties received default, auction or repossession notices in April, the fewest in 40 months, the Irvine, California-based data seller said today in a statement. It was the seventh straight month that filings dropped from a year earlier. They were down 9 percent from March. One in 593 U.S. households got a notice.

“Banks already sitting on thousands of properties they can’t sell as quickly and profitably as they’d like aren’t going to be anxious to accelerate foreclosures on tens of thousands more,” Rick Sharga, RealtyTrac’s senior vice president, said in an e-mail.

But commercial real-estate is doing well enough:

Investors are turning to secondary markets as credit availability improves and surging demand for properties in New York, Washington and San Francisco boosts prices and reduces returns in those areas. Cities such as Dallas and Houston are attracting real estate buyers because of the prospects for job and population growth, according to Robert Bach, chief economist for Grubb & Ellis Co., a Santa Ana, California-based broker.

Jonathan Weil made a good observation yesterday:

Whenever you see an issuer of securities — be it a sovereign nation or a Wall Street bank — blame speculators, journalists or rumor- mongerers for its troubles, you know the bosses there are panicking.

One could even add “bloggers” to that list, nowadays!

It was a mixed day in the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts off 6bp, FixedResets up 3bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 12bp; but all three entries in the Performance Highlights table were positive. Volume was very light and spreads on some of the less liquid issues reached ridiculous levels.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1524 % 2,444.2
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1524 % 3,676.1
Floater 2.47 % 2.26 % 38,498 21.60 4 -0.1524 % 2,639.1
OpRet 4.87 % 3.63 % 62,588 0.46 9 -0.0643 % 2,421.1
SplitShare 5.20 % -1.69 % 64,323 0.59 6 0.2219 % 2,506.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0643 % 2,213.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.74 % 4.96 % 132,218 1.01 9 -0.0463 % 2,063.7
Perpetual-Discount 5.53 % 5.55 % 118,497 14.52 15 -0.0649 % 2,148.3
FixedReset 5.14 % 3.24 % 205,004 2.86 57 0.0264 % 2,310.4
Deemed-Retractible 5.18 % 4.91 % 297,928 8.08 53 0.1238 % 2,120.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
TDS.PR.C SplitShare 1.07 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-12-15
Maturity Price : 10.00
Evaluated at bid price : 10.38
Bid-YTW : -1.69 %
BAM.PR.X FixedReset 1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-05-12
Maturity Price : 23.06
Evaluated at bid price : 24.87
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %
IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.15
Bid-YTW : 6.17 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
MFC.PR.D FixedReset 232,222 RBC crossed blocks of 100,000 and 114,800, both at 27.55.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.51
Bid-YTW : 3.62 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 38,231 Desjardins crossed 29,400 at 26.05.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.02
Bid-YTW : 3.57 %
RY.PR.X FixedReset 34,600 TD crossed 25,000 at 27.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-09-23
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.35
Bid-YTW : 3.28 %
MFC.PR.A OpRet 29,430 TD crossed 25,000 at 25.80.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2015-12-18
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.65
Bid-YTW : 3.64 %
RY.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 27,637 Desjardins bought 11,500 from Nesbitt at 24.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.37
Bid-YTW : 4.76 %
RY.PR.G Deemed-Retractible 24,243 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.24
Bid-YTW : 4.87 %
There were 23 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.J OpRet Quote: 26.86 – 28.66
Spot Rate : 1.8000
Average : 1.0566

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-30
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.86
Bid-YTW : 4.23 %

IAG.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 26.95 – 28.25
Spot Rate : 1.3000
Average : 0.9425

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.95
Bid-YTW : 3.43 %

BNS.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 24.77 – 25.45
Spot Rate : 0.6800
Average : 0.5586

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.77
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %

PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 23.49 – 23.80
Spot Rate : 0.3100
Average : 0.2139

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-05-12
Maturity Price : 23.19
Evaluated at bid price : 23.49
Bid-YTW : 2.20 %

TRP.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 26.02 – 26.25
Spot Rate : 0.2300
Average : 0.1476

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.02
Bid-YTW : 3.57 %

FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount Quote: 23.10 – 23.33
Spot Rate : 0.2300
Average : 0.1499

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-05-12
Maturity Price : 22.90
Evaluated at bid price : 23.10
Bid-YTW : 5.31 %

May 11, 2011

May 11th, 2011

Nothing happened today.

It was another good solid day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts up 4bp, FixedResets gaining 13bp and DeemedRetractibles ahead 11bp.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.55%, equivalent to 7.22% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Volatility was muted and volume was average. Long Corporates now yield 5.4%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread is now 180bp, a little wider than the April 27 figure of 175bp.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.3765 % 2,448.0
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.3765 % 3,681.7
Floater 2.46 % 2.26 % 38,207 21.61 4 0.3765 % 2,643.1
OpRet 4.86 % 2.57 % 62,713 1.17 9 0.0799 % 2,422.6
SplitShare 5.21 % 0.11 % 65,257 0.59 6 0.0300 % 2,501.0
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0799 % 2,215.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.74 % 5.11 % 134,007 0.87 9 0.1316 % 2,064.7
Perpetual-Discount 5.53 % 5.55 % 118,393 14.52 15 0.0441 % 2,149.7
FixedReset 5.14 % 3.22 % 207,660 2.87 57 0.1279 % 2,309.8
Deemed-Retractible 5.18 % 4.94 % 300,198 8.08 53 0.1108 % 2,118.0
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
SLF.PR.F FixedReset -1.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.35
Bid-YTW : 3.16 %
RY.PR.F Deemed-Retractible 1.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.22
Bid-YTW : 4.83 %
GWO.PR.H Deemed-Retractible 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.03
Bid-YTW : 5.96 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
BNS.PR.Q FixedReset 90,820 Desjardins crossed 85,000 at 26.22.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-11-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.30
Bid-YTW : 2.87 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 62,940 TD crossed 50,000 at 25.68.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-02-29
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.65
Bid-YTW : 3.83 %
PWF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 47,499 Scotia crossed 40,000 at 24.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-05-11
Maturity Price : 23.62
Evaluated at bid price : 23.89
Bid-YTW : 5.53 %
RY.PR.Y FixedReset 42,990 Desjardins crossed 25,000 at 27.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-12-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.29
Bid-YTW : 3.38 %
CM.PR.J Deemed-Retractible 39,566 Desjardins crossed 30,000 at 24.35.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.31
Bid-YTW : 4.88 %
CM.PR.L FixedReset 38,920 TD crossed 31,000 at 27.83.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.63
Bid-YTW : 2.99 %
There were 34 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BNS.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 24.76 – 25.45
Spot Rate : 0.6900
Average : 0.4254

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.76
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %

FTS.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 26.09 – 26.99
Spot Rate : 0.9000
Average : 0.7104

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-10-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.09
Bid-YTW : 3.16 %

SLF.PR.F FixedReset Quote: 27.35 – 27.72
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2808

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.35
Bid-YTW : 3.16 %

CM.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 27.73 – 28.05
Spot Rate : 0.3200
Average : 0.2320

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.73
Bid-YTW : 3.09 %

ELF.PR.F Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.50 – 22.74
Spot Rate : 0.2400
Average : 0.1624

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.50
Bid-YTW : 6.71 %

BMO.PR.J Deemed-Retractible Quote: 24.41 – 24.66
Spot Rate : 0.2500
Average : 0.1739

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.41
Bid-YTW : 4.79 %

RON.PR.A: DBRS Changes Trend to Negative

May 11th, 2011

DBRS has revised the trend on the Pfd-3 rating of RON.PR.A from stable to negative:

DBRS has today changed the trend on the BBB Senior Unsecured Debt rating and Pfd-3 Preferred Shares rating of RONA inc. (RONA or the Company) to Negative from Stable. The rating action reflects DBRS’s concern that weak operating performance and a challenging consumer environment may result in RONA’s credit risk profile to deteriorate to a level that is no longer consistent with the current rating categories.