Archive for December, 2012

BMO Preferreds Downgraded by S&P to P-2

Friday, December 14th, 2012

Standard & Poor’s has announced:

  • •We believe that the Canadian banking sector is encountering incremental pressure from headwinds facing the Canadian economy, which is heightening economic risk in the banking system.
  • •We also believe that industry risk for the Canadian banking sector is increasing. We expect that intensifying competition for loans and deposits will lead to pressure on profitability growth, especially in banks’ retail businesses.
  • •We are affirming our ‘A+/A-1’ long- and short-term issuer credit ratings on BMO and BMO Financial Corp., as well as the ‘A+’ issue rating on BMO’s senior unsecured debt. We are lowering our issue rating on BMO’s and BMO Financial’s subsidiaries’ nondeferrable subordinated debt to ‘BBB+’ from ‘A-‘, and our rating on its preferred shares and hybrid securities to ‘BBB’ from ‘BBB+’.
  • •The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the bank’s credit fundamentals will remain consistent with its current ratings over the next 24 months.


The resulting SACP of ‘a-‘ is adjusted upward two notches in arriving at the ‘A+’ issuer credit rating, reflecting our expectation for potential extraordinary government support in a stress scenario.

We could revise the outlook to negative or lower the ratings if the Marshall & Ilsley acquisition pressures BMO’s operating performance through weakening asset quality and additional credit marks, making net charge-offs consistently and materially exceed those of its domestic peers. We could also revise the outlook to negative or lower the rating if the projected Standard & Poor’s RAC ratio falls below 7% for several consecutive quarters. We could revise the outlook to positive or raise the rating if BMO garners a stronger retail and commercial market position in Canada, becoming more closely aligned with the top performers (TD Bank and Royal Bank of Canada, in our view), or if its RAC ratio is consistently above 10%. We see this as unlikely at this time.

BMO has the following series of preferreds outstanding: BMO.PR.H (Series 5); BMO.PR.J (Series 13); BMO.PR.K (Series 14); BMO.PR.L (Series 15); BMO.PR.M (Series 16); BMO.PR.N (Series 18); BMO.PR.O (Series 21); BMO.PR.P (Series 23) and BMO.PR.Q (Series 25). All have been downgraded to P-2 from P-2(high).

BNS Preferreds Downgraded by S&P to P-2(high); Outlook Now Stable

Friday, December 14th, 2012

Standard & Poor’s has announced:

  • •We believe that the Canadian banking sector is encountering incremental pressure from headwinds facing the Canadian economy, which is heightening economic risk in the banking system.
  • •We also believe industry risk for the Canadian banking sector is increasing. We expect that intensifying competition for loans and deposits will lead to pressure on profitability growth, especially in banks’ retail businesses.
  • •We are lowering our long- and short-term issuer credit ratings on Bank of Nova Scotia to ‘A+/A-1’ from ‘AA-/A-1+’, following our revision of the stand-alone credit profile on the bank to ‘a’ from ‘a+’, and assigning a stable outlook.
  • •The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Bank of Nova Scotia’s credit fundamentals will remain consistent with current ratings over the next 24 months.


Consequently, we lowered our anchor SACP, which is the starting point for our ratings on financial institutions operating primarily in Canada, to ‘a-‘ from ‘a’ But the anchor for BNS was lowered to ‘bbb+’ from ‘a-‘, reflecting its operating footprint in countries that are weaker than Canada, in our view. This is reflected in our revision of Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment (BICRA) for Canada to group ‘2’ from ‘1’ and revised our industry risk score, a component of the BICRA, to ‘2’ from ‘1’ (see “Various Rating Actions Taken On Canadian Financial Institutions Due To Rising Industry and Economic Risks,” published Dec. 13, 2012, on RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal).

The resulting SACP of ‘a’ is adjusted upward one notch in arriving at the ‘A+’ issuer credit rating to reflect our expectation for extraordinary government support in a crisis.

Hands up whoever feels good about sovereign support of BNS expansion into countries with weaker economies!

The prior negative outlook on BNS was reported on PrefBlog.

BNS has the following preferred shares outstanding: BNS.PR.J (Series 12); BNS.PR.K (Series 13); BNS.PR.L (Series 14); BNS.PR.M (Series 15); BNS.PR.N (Series 16); BNS.PR.O (Series 17); BNS.PR.P (Series 18); BNS.PR.Q (Series 20); BNS.PR.R (Series 22); BNS.PR.T (Series 26); BNS.PR.X (Series 28); BNS.PR.Y (Series 30) and BNS.PR.Z (Series 32). All have been downgraded from P-1(low) to P-2(high).

LB Preferreds Downgraded by S&P; Outlook Now Stable

Friday, December 14th, 2012

Standard & Poor’s has announced:

  • •We believe that the Canadian banking sector is encountering incremental pressure from headwinds facing the Canadian economy, which is heightening economic risk in the banking system.
  • •We also believe industry risk for the Canadian banking sector is increasing. We expect that intensifying competition for loans and deposits will lead to pressure on profitability growth, especially in banks’ retail businesses.
  • •We are lowering our long- and short-term issuer credit ratings on Laurentian Bank to ‘BBB/A-2’ from ‘BBB+/A-2’, and assigning a stable outlook, following our revision of Laurentian Bank’s stand-alone credit profile to ‘bbb’ from ‘bbb+’. In conjunction with these actions, we are also lowering our issue ratings on Laurentian Bank’s senior unsecured debt to ‘BBB’ from ‘BBB+’ and its nondeferrable subordinated debt to ‘BBB-‘ from ‘BBB’, and its preferred shares and hybrids to ‘BB+’ from ‘BBB-‘.
  • •The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Laurentian will maintain its current credit profile across a range of future scenarios.


Our “weak” business position assessment of Laurentian recognizes the bank’s limited diversity of business lines and somewhat concentrated regional focus. Recent acquisitions to expand Laurentian’s B2B franchise may over time contribute to the resilience of Laurentian’s business position, although integration costs and risks offset the potential benefits in the near term.

We view Laurentian Bank’s funding as “above average” and liquidity as “adequate”, given the bank’s relatively low reliance on more expensive and less reliable wholesale funds; competition for retail deposits will likely continue to impose margin pressure on Laurentian, however.

In distinction to their views on CM but similarly to NA, there is no allusion to LB being systemically important and no expectation of government support in times of stress.

S&P’s prior outlook of Negative on LB was reported on PrefBlog.

LB has three issues of preferreds outstanding: LB.PR.D (Series 9); LB.PR.E (Series 10); and LB.PR.F (Series 11). All have been downgraded from P-2(low) to P-3(high).

NA Preferreds Downgraded by S&P; Outlook Now Stable

Friday, December 14th, 2012

Standard & Poor’s has announced:

  • •We believe that the Canadian banking sector is encountering incremental pressure from headwinds facing the Canadian economy, which is heightening economic risk in the banking system.
  • •We also believe industry risk for the Canadian banking sector is increasing. We expect that intensifying competition for loans and deposits will lead to pressure on profitability growth, especially in banks’ retail businesses.
  • •We are lowering our long- and short-term issuer credit ratings on National Bank of Canada to ‘A-/A-2’ from ‘A/A-1’, following our revision of the stand-alone credit profile on the bank to ‘a-‘ from ‘a’. The outlook is stable.
  • •The stable outlook reflects our expectation that National Bank of Canada’s credit fundamentals will remain consistent with current ratings over the next 24 months.

In distinction to S&P’s views regarding CM, there is no allusion to NA being systemically important and no expectation of government support in times of stress.

S&P’s prior Negative Outlook on NA was reported on PrefBlog.

NA has the following preferred share issues outstanding: NA.PR.K (Series 15, called for redemption); NA.PR.L (Series 16); NA.PR.M (Series 20); NA.PR.N (Series 21); NA.PR.O (Series 24); NA.PR.P (Series 26); NA.PR.Q (Series 28). All have been downgraded to P-2 from P-2(high).

CM Preferreds Downgraded by S&P

Friday, December 14th, 2012

Standard and Poor’s has announced:

  • •We believe that the Canadian banking sector is encountering incremental pressure from headwinds facing the Canadian economy, which is heightening
    economic risk in the banking system.

  • •We also believe that industry risk for the Canadian banking sector is
    increasing. We expect that intensifying competition for loans and deposits will lead to pressure on profitability growth, especially in banks’ retail businesses.

  • •We are affirming our ‘A+/A-1’ long- and short-term issuer credit ratings
    on CIBC, as well as the ‘A+’ issue rating on CIBC’s senior unsecured debt. We are lowering our issue rating on CIBC’s nondeferrable subordinated debt to ‘BBB+’ from ‘A-‘, and our rating on its preferred shares and hybrids to ‘BBB’ from ‘BBB+’.

  • •The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the bank’s credit fundamentals will remain consistent with its current ratings over the next 24 months.


It is our view that CIBC is a “systemically important” bank and that it would likely benefit from extraordinary government support in times of stress.

This results in the CM PerpetualPremiums, CM.PR.D (Series 26) and CM.PR.E (Series 27) being downgraded from P-2 to P-2(low). CM.PR.G (Series 29) can be taken as equivalent although it is not rated by S&P, oddly enough. These are the issues which have been recognized by OSFI has having a good enough NVCC clause.

CM’s other three issues outstanding are CM.PR.K (Series 33), CM.PR.L (Series 35) and CM.PR.M (Series 37), have been downgraged to P-2 from P-2(high)

December 12, 2012

Wednesday, December 12th, 2012

IIROC has published a study of HFT titled The HOT Study: Phases I and II of IIROC’s Study of High Frequency Trading Activity on Canadian Equity Marketplaces:

Despite the absence of a clear definition, HFT is of concern to many stakeholders in the Canadian equity marketplace:
• Retail investors complain that their bids and offers are often continuously bettered by the minimum tick size, forcing them to cross the spread by entering market orders to execute a trade;

So retail investors attempting to get paid for supplying liquidity to the marketplace find out that somebody else can supply it cheaper. BooHooHoo.

• Institutional investors, and inventory traders providing liquidity to them, are concerned that algorithms with a technological advantage prey on their large orders, negatively impacting their transaction prices and trading costs;

So market participants with brains manage to out-trade salesmen with big smiles. BooHooHoo.

• Traditional market makers complain they are unable to compete with high frequency electronic liquidity providers (“ELP”);

So the buggy-whip boys can’t compete with nerdy little geeks who didn’t even go to the right schools. BooHooHoo.

• Regulators are concerned with the heightened possibility of spoofing, layering, quote stuffing and other potentially manipulative activity; and

Finally! A point that might, possibly, in some alternate universe, be of concern. You can’t spoof or manipulate somebody who trades on fundamentals – in fact, any attempt to do so is just as likely to provide a fundamental trader with an opportunity as otherwise. Why are the regulators so concerned about protecting idiots who don’t trade on fundamentals? Why are the regulators so upset that sometimes the gamers get outgamed?

• Participants are impacted by increased messaging rates incurring costs for processing and storing data.

Well, that’s the participants’ problem, isn’t it? Just part of that nasty little thing called “competition”, that the regulators are determined to stamp out so the financial marketplace can become a cooperative game where we all help each other, just like in kiddy-school. At any rate, if the exchanges consider it to be a problem (or a potential source of competitive advantage) they can always start charging for each order placed, regardless of whether or not it’s filled.

IIROC, eh? They’re good at awarding single-source contracts to insiders … at thinking things through, not so much.

The Press Release highlights the findings:

Key Findings of Phases I and II — Trading by the Study Group

  • • HOT traders:
    • o represent 11% of User IDs
    • o account for 22% of trading volume, 32% of dollar value, 42% of trades and 94% of all order messages sent
    • o trade 36% of all Canadian share volume traded in US inter-listed securities
    • o trade 60% of all Canadian trading in ETFs and ETNs
  • • HOT users trade:
    • o a larger percentage of total dark activity than displayed market activity
    • o anonymously more often than other market participants
    • o passively approximately 66% of the time
    • o over 90% of their activity through seven IIROC Dealer Members
    • o 23% of their volume within the same broker1 – generally more than retail users and less than other users (excluding retail)
    • o predominantly liquid TSX-listed securities priced over $1.00
    • o more in TSX 60 Index securities than in other TSX-listed securities
    • o primarily outside of the Opening or Market on Close trading sessions
  • • HOT Users earned $250,000 more per day in rebates than they paid in fees. All other participants earned more rebates than HOT Users; however these other participants paid $462,000 more per day in fees than they earned in rebates.
  • • 40% of HOT Users were identified as DMA (as opposed to non-DMA).
  • • HOT DMA Users:
    • o were responsible for the majority of trading by all HOT Users
    • o that were categorized as “Fast” (44% of HOT DMA Users) were responsible for 91% of HOT DMA Users’ share volume
    • o have lower order-to-trade ratios when compared with non-DMA HOT Users
  • • Average order-to-trade ratio is higher in ETF trading for all HOT Users, but particularly for the non-DMA groups.
  • • By all measures, HOT clients (DMA and non-DMA) are more active in common shares and HOT non-DMA (inventory and other) are more active in ETFs/ETNs.

The FOMC statement was interesting:

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee expects that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. The Committee views these thresholds as consistent with its earlier date-based guidance. In determining how long to maintain a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy, the Committee will also consider other information, including additional measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent.

The Canadian preferred share market drifted slightly upwards today, with PerpetualPremiums and DeemedRetractibles gaining 2bp and FixedResets winning 6bp. Volatility was minimal. Volume was average, but made notable by significant trading in the BAM floaters.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 4.87%, equivalent to 6.33% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield about 4.25%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 210bp, a slight (and perhaps spurious) decline from the 215bp reported December 5.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0083 % 2,478.1
FixedFloater 4.11 % 3.46 % 29,202 18.35 1 0.6090 % 3,917.7
Floater 2.80 % 2.99 % 57,383 19.76 4 -0.0083 % 2,675.7
OpRet 4.62 % 1.81 % 35,823 0.51 4 0.0569 % 2,599.7
SplitShare 4.65 % 4.71 % 62,597 4.41 2 0.0405 % 2,864.3
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0569 % 2,377.2
Perpetual-Premium 5.25 % 2.14 % 73,055 0.38 30 0.0187 % 2,320.2
Perpetual-Discount 4.86 % 4.87 % 134,646 15.61 4 0.0139 % 2,631.4
FixedReset 4.94 % 2.95 % 230,818 4.34 77 0.0640 % 2,449.9
Deemed-Retractible 4.91 % 3.17 % 115,934 0.68 46 0.0230 % 2,407.2
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
GWO.PR.N FixedReset -1.90 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.22
Bid-YTW : 3.86 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
MFC.PR.J FixedReset 281,692 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 3.82 %
BAM.PR.K Floater 172,050 Nesbitt crossed 150,000 at 17.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-12
Maturity Price : 17.36
Evaluated at bid price : 17.36
Bid-YTW : 3.02 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 160,822 Nesbitt crossed 150,000 at 17.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-12
Maturity Price : 17.50
Evaluated at bid price : 17.50
Bid-YTW : 2.99 %
RY.PR.T FixedReset 136,250 RBC crossed 119,800 at 26.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.76
Bid-YTW : 2.22 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset 103,828 Desjardins crossed 95,800 at 24.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.27
Bid-YTW : 3.51 %
BMO.PR.M FixedReset 96,184 National crossed 70,000 at 24.76.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 3.19 %
There were 29 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.K Floater Quote: 17.36 – 18.10
Spot Rate : 0.7400
Average : 0.5562

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-12
Maturity Price : 17.36
Evaluated at bid price : 17.36
Bid-YTW : 3.02 %

FTS.PR.E OpRet Quote: 27.12 – 27.50
Spot Rate : 0.3800
Average : 0.2807

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 27.12
Bid-YTW : -5.98 %

GWO.PR.N FixedReset Quote: 23.22 – 23.45
Spot Rate : 0.2300
Average : 0.1307

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.22
Bid-YTW : 3.86 %

CIU.PR.B FixedReset Quote: 26.64 – 26.90
Spot Rate : 0.2600
Average : 0.1626

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.64
Bid-YTW : 2.31 %

HSE.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 25.78 – 26.03
Spot Rate : 0.2500
Average : 0.1529

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-12
Maturity Price : 23.58
Evaluated at bid price : 25.78
Bid-YTW : 2.92 %

HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.82 – 26.10
Spot Rate : 0.2800
Average : 0.1838

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.82
Bid-YTW : -6.20 %

December 11, 2012

Tuesday, December 11th, 2012

What’s going on with Northern Securities, IIROC and Penson?:

9. NSI advised IIROC Staff that it was considering the following three options to address the pending wind down of Penson:
i. Retain a new carrying broker;
ii. Enter into an omnibus arrangement with an existing carrying broker or self-clearing firm and administer certain back office functions itself;
iii. Enter into a business amalgamation or a sale.

10. On November 23, 2012, IIROC Staff advised NSI that NSI’s failure to enter into a new introducing-carrying arrangement or to demonstrate progress toward an alternative arrangement would soon result in such financial and operating difficulty for NSI that NSI cannot be permitted to continue to operate without risk of imminent harm to NSI’s clients.

11. IIROC Staff also advised NSI that if it did not enter into a binding agreement for either a new introducing-carrying arrangement or a business combination with a self-clearing Dealer Member by December 7, 2012, then IIROC Staff would proceed to an expedited hearing to seek appropriate remedies from an IIROC Hearing Panel.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums gaining 6bp, FixedResets down 3bp and DeemedRetractibles off 2bp. Volatility was low. Volume was heavy.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0133 % 2,478.3
FixedFloater 4.13 % 3.48 % 28,122 18.30 1 -0.4762 % 3,894.0
Floater 2.79 % 3.01 % 56,494 19.63 4 0.0133 % 2,675.9
OpRet 4.60 % 1.03 % 35,270 0.48 4 0.0569 % 2,598.3
SplitShare 4.65 % 4.72 % 64,652 4.41 2 0.3247 % 2,863.1
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0569 % 2,375.9
Perpetual-Premium 5.25 % 1.83 % 74,102 0.38 30 0.0601 % 2,319.8
Perpetual-Discount 4.83 % 4.87 % 132,848 15.61 4 0.0304 % 2,631.0
FixedReset 4.94 % 2.95 % 219,461 4.34 77 -0.0298 % 2,448.4
Deemed-Retractible 4.91 % 2.52 % 119,262 0.45 46 -0.0152 % 2,406.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
TRP.PR.C FixedReset -1.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-11
Maturity Price : 23.57
Evaluated at bid price : 25.67
Bid-YTW : 2.79 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
ENB.PR.T FixedReset 249,620 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-11
Maturity Price : 23.10
Evaluated at bid price : 25.02
Bid-YTW : 3.70 %
MFC.PR.J FixedReset 140,025 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.11
Bid-YTW : 3.91 %
TD.PR.O Deemed-Retractible 106,124 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 25.85.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-01-10
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.83
Bid-YTW : -4.40 %
ENB.PR.B FixedReset 103,159 TD crossed 73,600 at 25.24; Nesbitt bought 10,000 from National at 25.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-11
Maturity Price : 23.28
Evaluated at bid price : 25.24
Bid-YTW : 3.57 %
POW.PR.G Perpetual-Premium 101,380 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 27.15.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2020-04-15
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 27.02
Bid-YTW : 4.58 %
TD.PR.I FixedReset 78,652 RBC crossed 67,600 at 26.85.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.84
Bid-YTW : 2.11 %
There were 43 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.K Floater Quote: 17.50 – 18.10
Spot Rate : 0.6000
Average : 0.3548

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-11
Maturity Price : 17.50
Evaluated at bid price : 17.50
Bid-YTW : 3.03 %

TRP.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 25.67 – 25.99
Spot Rate : 0.3200
Average : 0.1784

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-11
Maturity Price : 23.57
Evaluated at bid price : 25.67
Bid-YTW : 2.79 %

PWF.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 26.03 – 26.36
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2250

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.03
Bid-YTW : 2.91 %

PWF.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 25.12 – 25.35
Spot Rate : 0.2300
Average : 0.1665

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-11
Maturity Price : 23.40
Evaluated at bid price : 25.12
Bid-YTW : 2.95 %

BMO.PR.K Deemed-Retractible Quote: 26.16 – 26.27
Spot Rate : 0.1100
Average : 0.0707

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-01-10
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.16
Bid-YTW : 0.25 %

POW.PR.C Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.51 – 25.65
Spot Rate : 0.1400
Average : 0.1052

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-01-10
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.51
Bid-YTW : -7.73 %

INE.PR.C Shows Lots of Volume But No Energy On Closing

Tuesday, December 11th, 2012

Innergex Renewable Energy Inc. has announced that it:

has completed today the previously announced bought deal offering of Cumulative Redeemable Fixed-Rate Preferred Shares Series C (the “Series C Shares”).

The Corporation issued a total of 2,000,000 Series C Shares at a price of $25.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $50,000,000. The offering was made on a bought deal basis through a syndicate of underwriters co-led by TD Securities Inc., National Bank Financial Inc. and BMO Capital Markets.

The Series C Shares commence trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange today under the symbol INE.PR.C.

The Corporation intends to use the proceeds of the offering to repay a portion of its revolving term credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

The Series C Shares were distributed under a short form prospectus dated December 4, 2012 and details of the distribution are set out in the short form prospectus which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

INE.PR.C is a Straight Perpetual, 5.75%, announced November 21. It is rated Pfd-3(low) [Trend Negative] by DBRS.

INE.PR.C will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and assigned to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

INE.PR.C traded 136,220 shares today in a range of 24.45-76 before closing at 24.46-50, 50×35 – the volume was pretty good considering it’s only a $50-million issue! Vital statistics are:

INE.PR.C Perpetual-Discount YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-12-11
Maturity Price : 24.10
Evaluated at bid price : 24.46
Bid-YTW : 5.90 %

YLO Reorganization To Be Effective December 20

Tuesday, December 11th, 2012

Yellow Media Inc. has announced:

it reached a settlement with the lenders under its senior unsecured credit facility who were opposing the Company’s proposed recapitalization (the “Recapitalization”). Pursuant to the settlement, such lenders agreed to notify the Québec Superior Court (the “Court”) that they do not object to the implementation of the Recapitalization and agreed to facilitate its implementation.

The Company has agreed to propose to the Court that the terms of the Recapitalization be amended such that:

  • upon implementation of the Recapitalization, the Company will pay to the lenders, the holders of its existing medium term notes and the holders of its existing convertible unsecured subordinated debentures all accrued and unpaid interest up to but excluding the date of implementation of the Recapitalization, and pay to the lenders the $25 million amortization payment on the outstanding balance of the non-revolving tranche of the credit facility originally due on October 1, 2012;
  • the lenders will receive $25 million additional principal amount of new senior secured notes pursuant to the Recapitalization;
  • in exchange for the payment of the additional $25 million amortization amount on the non-revolving tranche of the credit facility and the issuance of the additional $25 million principal amount of new senior secured notes to the lenders upon implementation of the Recapitalization, the principal amount of the outstanding credit facility debt will be reduced by $58 million, from $369 million to $311 million, for purposes of calculating the pro rata distribution of the consideration under the Recapitalization;
  • the holders of the existing convertible unsecured subordinated debentures will receive $5 million additional principal amount of new senior subordinated exchangeable debentures pursuant to the Recapitalization;
  • the annual interest rate on the new senior secured notes will be increased from 9.00% to 9.25%;
  • the mandatory redemption provisions in respect of the new senior secured notes will be amended to provide, notably, that:
    • o the Company will use an amount equivalent to 75% (up from 70%) of its consolidated excess cash flow (as determined pursuant to the indenture governing the new senior secured notes) for the immediately preceding two fiscal quarters, on a semi-annual basis on the last day of May and November of each year, commencing on May 31, 2013, to redeem the new senior secured notes at par on a pro rata basis;
    • o the Company will make minimum annual aggregate mandatory redemption payments thereunder of $100 million for the combined payments due on May 31, 2013 and November 30, 2013, $75 million for the combined payments due on May 31, 2014 and November 30, 2014, and $50 million for the combined payments due on May 31, 2015 and November 30, 2015; and
    • o for purposes of determining consolidated excess cash flow, deductions for capital expenditures and information systems/information technology (IS/IT) expenses will each be subject to an annual deduction limit of $50 million;
  • the Board of Directors of New Yellow Media will be comprised of ten directors (instead of nine) and the lenders will have the right to nominate one member of the initial Board of Directors of New Yellow Media, who will also be a member of the initial audit committee of New Yellow Media.


As a result of the settlement, the Recapitalization is now expected to be implemented and become effective on December 20, 2012, subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange and the receipt of the final approval from the Court in respect of the Recapitalization, which is no longer being contested by any party before the Court.

As a result of the Recapitalization becoming effective, the Company will not redeem any existing cumulative redeemable first preferred shares, series 1 that have been or may be tendered for redemption by holders in accordance with the terms of such preferred shares beginning as of December 31, 2012, and will therefore not pay any retraction price nor any accrued and unpaid dividends in respect thereof. Pursuant to the Recapitalization, the holders of all of Yellow Media’s existing preferred shares, other than the preferred shares, series 7, will be entitled to receive the same consideration (as described above) in exchange for each preferred share and all related entitlements.

In the course of negotiations with the lenders in connection with the Recapitalization, the Company disclosed confidential information to the lenders pursuant to signed confidentiality agreements.

According to the 5-Year Plan, forecasted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) during the five-year period should be sufficient to enable the Company to meet its obligations and give effect to its announced business plan notwithstanding that those forecasts showed fiscal 2013 EBITDA being substantially lower than forecasted fiscal 2012 EBITDA.

The company has four series of preferred shares outstanding, YLO.PR.A, YLO.PR.B, YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D. These shares will be wiped out in exchange for shares representing 6.5% of the outstanding common together with some warrants.

Complaint Examination Policy

Tuesday, December 11th, 2012

Hymas Investment Management Inc. is required to have a Complaint Examination Policy due to its registration with the Autorité des marchés financiers.

Accordingly, a Complaints Policy has been prepared and is linked on the corporate website through the page Ethical Standards.