BCE Deal Dead

December 11th, 2008

BCE Acquisition has announced:

that the agreement to acquire BCE Inc. (TSX, NYSE: BCE) has been terminated in accordance with its terms.

Receipt of a solvency opinion from a nationally recognized valuation firm was included in the June 30, 2007 definitive agreement between the Purchaser and BCE as a mutual closing condition. The agreement of the Purchaser and BCE to both the selection of KPMG to serve as the valuation firm and the form of the solvency opinion was reflected in the July 4, 2008 amendment to the definitive agreement. Because KPMG has concluded that a required test for the solvency opinion was not met, this mutual condition to completion of the acquisition could not be, and was not, satisfied. Accordingly, the Purchaser terminated the agreement in accordance with its terms. Under these circumstances neither party owes a termination fee to the other.

There is no telling what will happen now. In an ideal world, we return to the status quo ante and the BCE Prefs retain their Pfd-2(low) / P-2(low) credit rating. But Bloomberg reports other ideas:

BCE Inc., the Canadian phone company that had been planning to go private for the past 18 months, may have to buy back shares or restore its dividend to placate investors now that its leveraged buyout has fallen apart.

But I’m afraid that in the absence of strong, credible statements from BCE regarding their capital structure going forward, BCE prefs remain rather more speculative than I like.

The last post in this saga was BCE Buyout in Trouble; Prefs Plunge.

BCE has the following preferred shares outstanding: BCE.PR.A, BCE.PR.B, BCE.PR.C, BCE.PR.D, BCE.PR.E, BCE.PR.F, BCE.PR.G, BCE.PR.H, BCE.PR.I, BCE.PR.R, BCE.PR.S, BCE.PR.T, BCE.PR.Y & BCE.PR.Z

Update, 2008-12-11: BCE is desperately grandstanding:

BCE Inc. (TSX, NYSE: BCE) today announced that it received last evening from the Purchaser, a company formed by an investor group led by Teachers’ Private Capital, the private investment arm of the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, and affiliates of Providence Equity Partners Inc., Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, and Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity, a notice purporting to terminate the Definitive Agreement dated June 29, 2007, as amended. BCE disputes that the Purchaser was entitled to terminate the Definitive Agreement, as such notice was delivered prematurely, prior to the outside date for closing of the transaction, and therefore invalid. Given the Purchaser’s position, the BCE privatization
transaction will not proceed.

As previously announced, the closing of the privatization transaction is contingent upon the fulfillment of several closing conditions, including, pursuant to Section 8.1(f) of the Definitive Agreement, the receipt at the effective time of a positive solvency opinion from KPMG. Earlier this morning, KPMG confirmed that it would not be able to deliver an opinion that BCE would
meet, post transaction, the solvency tests set out in the Definitive Agreement.

In light of these developments, BCE will be terminating the Definitive Agreement in accordance with its terms, and will be demanding payment of the $1.2-billion break-up fee from the Purchaser. All closing conditions have been satisfied by BCE, other than the solvency opinion, a condition to closing that was to be satisfied by its nature at the effective time. Under such circumstances, the agreement provides that the break up fee will be owed to BCE by the Purchaser. The Purchaser has taken the position that it is not obligated to pay the break-up fee.

In addition, the BCE Board intends that immediately following termination of the Definitive Agreement in accordance with its terms, it will address a reinstatement of its common share dividend beginning with its fourth quarter common share dividend payable on January 15, 2009, and that it will return capital to its shareholders through a Normal Course Issuer Bid.

I would have a lot more confidence in the credit quality of the BCE Prefs if they indicated the size of the Normal Course Issuer Bid.

December 10, 2008

December 10th, 2008

This is funny. Goldman is being criticized for advising shorting municipal credit (via credit default swaps):

It’s “disturbing” to advise investors to bet against the financial health of a state whose bonds Goldman helps sell, Assemblyman Gary S. Schaer, a Democrat who chairs the Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee, said last week in a letter to Chief Executive Officer Lloyd C. Blankfein.

“New Jersey needs to maximize its presence in the credit markets, not to see its presence undermined.” Schaer wrote.

As part of a September presentation to institutional investors on “Best Long and Short Risk Strategies,” Goldman recommended buying credit-default swaps on “a basket of liquid State General Obligation credits with current and worsening fiscal outlooks,” including California, Florida, Nevada, Ohio, Wisconsin and Michigan.

The firm also recommended the derivatives on states with “significant unfunded pension” and other retiree obligations, including Illinois, Connecticut, Hawaii, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Nevada.

The practice of betting against such states is “distasteful,” said Frank Hoadley, Wisconsin’s director of capital finance in Madison.

Didn’t we do the whole “analyst independence” thing a few years ago? However, the original Newark Star-Ledger story, while attempting to sell newspapers, is better balanced than Bloomberg’s efforts.

I do apologize … but I am YET AGAIN neglecting to present the price-movement and volume-highlight tables. At some point, perhaps, I will have caught up on other committments – but not tonight.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30.
The Fixed-Reset index was added effective 2008-9-5 at that day’s closing value of 1,119.4 for the Fixed-Floater index.
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Fixed-Floater 7.50% 7.85% 93,464 12.74 6 -4.0589% 705.4
Floater 9.56% 9.85% 72,723 9.52 2 +3.0634% 371.0
Op. Retract 5.46% 6.42% 146,946 3.97 15 +0.7500% 990.9
Split-Share 6.95% 13.38% 73,707 3.95 14 -0.1942% 887.0
Interest Bearing 9.69% 20.82% 55,306 2.78 3 -0.2190% 756.4
Perpetual-Premium N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Perpetual-Discount 7.79% 7.92% 212,362 11.50 71 +0.0649% 709.9
Fixed-Reset 6.02% 5.38% 1,081,559 14.48 16 +0.5017% 995.8

STW.PR.A: Stealth Redemption Confirmed

December 10th, 2008

The essence of the redemption noted by Assiduous Reader erikd has been confirmed:

STW.PR.A has been called at $10.2 + accrued for total of $10.3173913 per share. 33.8575% of preferred shares have been called. This is a good premium to last friday’s trading price.

source is bloomberg, under news of the capital shares
I grabbed the screen at work. It will trade ex-redemption on Dec 9th, and supposed to get redeemed on Dec 12th.

I have confirmed with investor relations at Middlefield that the size is at least approximately correct; the redemption price per the prospectus is indeed 10.20.

The closing quote on Dec 8 – the last cum-redemption day, according to erikd, and the day he posted his note – was 9.11-18, on volume of 9227 shares. Yesterday was 8.64-87 on 5,294 shares. Today was 8.80-26, 13×2 on no volume.

I don’t know when the information was posted on Bloomberg, but if I had sold shares prior to the ex-redemption date and after the posting, I’d be pretty upset. According to me, a sizable redemption at a premium of more than 10% to market price counts as material information. Nothing was on their website, and investor relations could not confirm or deny immediately.

Their investor relations representative emphasized that they were not in breach of regulatory requirements. That may well be the case (it is not my place to judge) but I will suggest that:

  • The redemption was material information.
  • Bloomberg is a paid service; advising Bloomberge does not (or should not) constitute public disclosure
  • Therefore – whatever the strict legalities might be – I consider this a case of selective disclosure
  • If Middlefield did indeed follow minimum regulatory standards, that’s not good enough. They should have more consideration for their investors’ interests than that.
  • Let’s see a press release next time!

I will also be most interested to learn whether Middlefield purchased preferred according to the issuer bid. I will suggest that, given that STW.PR.A has not closed above 9.60 in at least a month, it would have been in the best interests of the fund to have exercised this right to the maximum extent possible.

I have noted a previous STW.PR.A stealth redemption.

STW.PR.A is tracked by HIMIPref™ and is part of the InterestBearing subindex. Given the low asset coverage ratio, it will probably be downgraded at some point in the near future at which point it will be relegated to “Scraps”. It is also possible that reduced liquidity due to the reduced float will be a prior cause for relegation.

Weston on Review-Developing by DBRS

December 10th, 2008

DBRS has announced that it:

has today placed the long-term and short-term ratings of George Weston Limited (Weston or the Company) – the Notes & Debentures at BBB, the Preferred Shares at Pfd-3 and the Commercial Paper at R-2 (high) – Under Review with Developing Implications.

The action follows Weston’s announcement today that its subsidiary, Dunedin Holdings S.a.r.l. (Dunedin), has entered into an agreement to sell its U.S. fresh bread and baked goods business to Grupo Bimbo for net proceeds of approximately US$2.5 billion. The completion of the transaction is subject to normal closing conditions, including regulatory approval; if the closing conditions are met, the parties expect the transaction to close in the first quarter of 2009.

Although the transaction represents an opportunity for Weston to realize a significant gain on the sale of this business, which it acquired in 2001, it will fundamentally alter the Company’s profile as the business to be sold represents more than half of Weston’s (ex-Loblaw Companies Limited (Loblaw)) operating income.

Dunedin contributed US$255 million of EBITDA to Weston’s consolidated results for the 52-weeks ended October 4, 2008. On this basis, DBRS estimates Weston’s pro forma (from continuing businesses) EBITDA for the same period to be approximately $175 million – this estimate also adjusts for the December 1, 2008 sale of Neilson Dairy (approximately $50 million of annual EBITDA) to Saputo Inc. for net proceeds of approximately $400 million.

The proposed divestiture of these assets would also have a meaningful impact on Weston’s financial risk profile. DBRS estimates the Company would have total cash and cash equivalents of more than $3.5 billion, after repaying $250 million of notes that come due in February 2009 and satisfying it current intention to redeem approximately $265 million of preferred shares in 2009. This cash and equivalent balance would compare to an estimated gross debt balance of $775 million (after February 2009) and preferred share balance of $835 million.

In its review, DBRS will focus on Weston’s intention with regards to its large cash and cash equivalent balance, its remaining operating business and its investment in Loblaw. DBRS believes that with an appropriate financial profile, Weston has the ability to remain placed in the BBB rating category with its continuing businesses (i.e., gross debt-to-pro forma EBITDA a maximum of 2.5 times).

The ratings for Loblaw (rated BBB and R-2 (middle) with Negative trends) remain unaffected at this point as DBRS believes the proposed transaction, in and of itself, does not impact the credit risk profile of Loblaw.

We’ll see what happens! Presumably the credit would be adversely affected if they use the excess cash to privatize Loblaws:

Speculation has swirled over what the company could do with its bulked up bank account.

Galen Weston said the company could look towards opportunities in either the United States or Canada, and the possibility of expanding its frozen bakery business.

There have also been suggestions that Weston is planning to buy out minority shareholders of Loblaw Cos. (TSX: L.TO), Canada’s largest supermarket operator. That would cost Weston about $3.5 billion at current stock values.

Galen Weston briefly addressed the rumours after an analyst question.

“The way we look at our position in the baking and supermarket business is there’s a lot more opportunity to come,” he said, without mentioning specifics.

Outstanding Weston issues are WN.PR.A, WN.PR.B, WN.PR.C, WN.PR.D and WN.PR.E. They were last mentioned on PrefBlog en masse when Loblaws was downgraded. All issues are tracked by HIMIPref™, but are incorporated in the Scraps index due to credit concerns.

Update: S&P is much more emphatic:

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services today said it placed its ratings, including its ‘BBB’ long-term corporate credit rating, on Toronto-based George Weston Ltd. on CreditWatch with negative implications. This means that we could either lower or affirm the ratings after completion of our review.

“The CreditWatch placement follows the company’s announcement that its subsidiary, Dunedin Holdings SARL, is in discussions with Mexico-based Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V. about the possible divestment of George Weston’s U.S. fresh bread and baked goods business,” said Standard & Poor’s credit analyst Lori Harris. Although total estimated sales proceeds and their redeployment are currently unknown, there is market speculation about whether the proceeds will be used for the possible privatization of George Weston’s 62%-owned subsidiary Loblaw Companies Ltd. (BBB/Negative/–) or of George Weston itself.

“In Standard & Poor’s opinion, the deployment of potential sales proceeds for privatization or acquisitions, combined with the absence of the EBITDA for the U.S. fresh baked goods business, could lead to higher debt levels and weaker credit protection measures,” Ms. Harris added. With adjusted debt to EBITDA of about 4.4x for the 12 months ended Oct. 4, 2008, George Weston’s credit measures are already weak for the ratings in our view.

While the ratings on George Weston and Loblaw are currently the same, the rating relationship between the two remains one of linkage, not equalization, with each rating jointly influenced by the respective credit profiles. In the event of the sale, Standard & Poor’s would reevaluate the key parent-subsidiary relationship, including the strategic importance and ownership structure, to determine the rating links between George Weston and Loblaw. The ratings could become equalized should the relationship become significantly closer.

Standard & Poor’s will monitor current developments and meet with management to discuss the proposed divestment and use of proceeds. The resolution of the CreditWatch placement depends on the transaction closing and subsequent redeployment of funds, the revised capital structure, and George Weston’s future business and financial strategies.

December 9, 2008

December 9th, 2008

With all this rate-cutting, here’s a little bit of history for you: Four-Week US T-Bills were auctioned off at 0% today. A big fat zero, to three decimal places.

Preferred share volume remained heavy today (well … heavy for the preferred market, I mean!) while prices eased off after yesterday’s gains.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30.
The Fixed-Reset index was added effective 2008-9-5 at that day’s closing value of 1,119.4 for the Fixed-Floater index.
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Fixed-Floater 7.19% 7.52% 90,573 13.08 6 -1.2930% 735.2
Floater 9.85% 10.16% 69,970 9.28 2 -2.9216% 359.9
Op. Retract 5.50% 6.88% 145,387 4.04 15 +0.5511% 983.5
Split-Share 6.93% 13.28% 72,752 3.95 14 +0.3167% 888.7
Interest Bearing 9.67% 21.42% 56,961 2.82 3 -5.0826% 758.1
Perpetual-Premium N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Perpetual-Discount 7.80% 7.92% 209,091 11.50 71 -0.4855% 709.4
Fixed-Reset 6.05% 5.41% 1,106,660 14.44 16 +0.3609% 990.8
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
FIG.PR.A InterestBearing -8.5308% Asset coverage of 1.0+:1 as of December 4, based on Capital Unit NAV of 0.39 according to Faircourt and 0.71 Capital Units per preferred. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 18.60% based on a bid of 5.79 and a hardMaturity 2014-12-31 at 10.00. Closing quote of 5.79-09, 2×2. Day’s range of 5.02-6.21.
STW.PR.A InterestBearing -5.1592% Asset coverage of 1.3-:1 as of December 4 according to Middlefield. Assiduous Reader erikd advises that there has been a rather large stealth-redemption; as of 4:30 pm, Middlefield’s Investor Relations department was unable to confirm or deny the report. A note on the November 30 NAV states “(Redemption Price Payable December 12, 2008)” Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 22.27% based on a bid of 8.64 and a hardMaturity 2009-12-31. Closing quote of 8.64-87, 60×1. Day’s range of 8.79-83.
BAM.PR.B Floater -4.0761%  
DFN.PR.A SplitShare -4.0586% Asset coverage of 1.7+:1 as of November 28 according to the company. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 8.58% based on a bid of 8.51 and a hardMaturity 2014-12-1 at 10.00. Closing quote of 8.51-06, 3×1. Day’s range of 8.72-85.
GWO.PR.G PerpetualDiscount -4.0219% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 8.30% based on a bid of 15.75 and a limitMaturity. Closing quote 15.75-17, 7×5. Day’s range of 15.67-48.
FBS.PR.B SplitShare -3.6765% Asset coverage of 1.0+:1 as of December 4 according to TD Securities. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 13.71% based on a bid of 7.86 and a hardMaturity 2011-12-15 at 10.00. Closing quote of 7.86-00, 32×17. Day’s range of 7.76-00.
SBN.PR.A SplitShare -3.0879% Asset coverage of 1.7-:1 as of December 4 according to Mulvihill. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 9.48% based on a bid of 8.16 and a hardMaturity 2014-12-1 at 10.00. Closing quote of 8.16-39, 3×1. Day’s range of 8.28-30.
BCE.PR.G FixFloat -2.9375%  
GWO.PR.I PerpetualDiscount -2.7465% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 8.19% based on a bid of 13.81 and a limitMaturity. Closing quote 13.81-90, 4×12. Day’s range of 13.61-25.
SLF.PR.A PerpetualDiscount -2.6756% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 8.20% based on a bid of 14.55 and a limitMaturity. Closing quote 14.55-65, 1×8. Day’s range of 14.27-19.
ALB.PR.A SplitShare -2.6366% Asset coverage of 1.2-:1 as of December 4 according to Scotia Managed Companies. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 14.56% based on a bid of 20.31 and a hardMaturity 2011-2-28 at 25.00. Closing quote of 20.31-48, 46×1. Day’s range of 20.31-86.
FTN.PR.A SplitShare -2.6277% Asset coverage of 1.6-:1 as of November 28 according to the company. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 12.73% based on a bid of 12.73% based on a bid of 6.67 and a hardMaturity 2015-12-1 at 10.00.
BCE.PR.C FixFloat -2.5215%  
PWF.PR.I PerpetualDiscount -2.2857% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 8.13% based on a bid of 18.81 and a limitMaturity. Closing quote 18.81-00, 4×7. Day’s range of 18.75-25.
CM.PR.D PerpetualDiscount -2.1476% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 8.25% based on a bid of 17.77 and a limitMaturity. Closing quote 17.77-99, 3×3. Day’s range of 17.87-30.
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat -2.0888%  
SLF.PR.E PerpetualDiscount -2.0863% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 8.31% based on a bid of 13.61 and a limitMaturity. Closing quote 13.61-75, 2×16. Day’s range of 13.52-90.
MFC.PR.A OpRet -2.0317% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.71% based on a bid of 24.11 and a softMaturity 2015-12-18 at 25.00. Closing quote of 24.11-66, 3×3. Day’s range of 24.05-99.
BNS.PR.N PerpetualDiscount -2.0157% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.64% based on a bid of 17.50 and a limitMaturity. Closing quote 17.50-67, 10×9. Day’s range of 17.55-25.
RY.PR.F PerpetualDiscount +2.0653% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.35% based on a bid of 15.32 and a limitMaturity. Closing quote 15.32-48. Day’s range of 15.03-75.
BAM.PR.H OpRet +2.2500% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 13.24% based on a bid of 20.45 and a softMaturity 2012-3-30 at 25.00. Closing quote of 20.45-00, 5×10. Day’s range of 20.20-50.
NA.PR.N FixedReset +3.1630%  
LFE.PR.A SplitShare +3.9744% Asset coverage of 1.7-:1 as of November 28 according to the company. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 11.41% based on a bid of 8.11 and a hardMaturity 2012-12-1 at 10.00. Closing quote of 8.11-23, 7×1. Day’s range of 7.91-24.
LBS.PR.A SplitShare +4.2802% Asset coverage of 1.4-:1 as of December 4 according to Brompton Group. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 10.72% based on a bid of 8.04 and a hardMaturity 2013-11-29 at 10.00. Closing quote of 8.04-24, 24×3. Day’s range of 7.70-25.
BAM.PR.O OpRet +10.3333% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 16.17% based on a bid of 16.55 and optionCertainty 2013-6-30 at 25.00. Closing quote of 16.55-17.60, 5×1. Day’s range of 15.65-17.25.
BNA.PR.B SplitShare +13.4089% Asset coverage of 1.6+:1 as of December 4 based on BAM.A at 16.72 and 2.4 BAM.A per unit. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 11.67% based on a bid of 17.00 and a hardMaturity 2016-3-25 at 25.00. Closing quote of 17.00-50, 10×11. Day’s range of 16.19-18.00.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
WN.PR.B Scraps (would be OpRet but there are credit concerns) 386,360 Desjardins crossed a block of 300,000, then 50,000, then 28,400 all at 25.05. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.57% based on a bid of 25.06 and OptionCertainty 2009-6-30.
BNS.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 247,193 Nesbitt crossed 110,600 at 18.00. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.43% based on a bid of 17.98 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.N FixedReset 109,740 Nesbitt bought 12,900 from Canaccord at 25.00. Recent new issue
MFC.PR.A OpRet 53,035 TD crossed 24,300 at 24.05. See above
RY.PR.I FixedReset 50,961 RBC crossed 23,700 at 21.40.
RY.PR.B PerpetualDiscount 49,197 Desjardins bought 26,300 from anonymous at 16.15. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.39% based on a bid of 16.10 and a limitMaturity.

There were seventy-four index-included $25-pv-equivalent issues trading over 10,000 shares today

Bank Rate Cut 75bp; Prime 50bp. Canada Prime Now 3.50%

December 9th, 2008

The Bank of Canada cut by 75bp today:

The Bank of Canada today announced that it is lowering its target for the overnight rate by three-quarters of a percentage point to 1 1/2 per cent. The operating band for the overnight rate is correspondingly lowered, and the Bank Rate is now 1 3/4 per cent.

The outlook for the world economy has deteriorated significantly and the global recession will be broader and deeper than previously anticipated. Global financial markets remain severely strained. Measures taken by major governments are beginning to encourage credit flows, although it will take some time before conditions in financial markets normalize. In addition, a series of recently announced monetary and fiscal policy actions will also support global economic growth.

While Canada’s economy evolved largely as expected during the summer and early autumn, it is now entering a recession as a result of the weakness in global economic activity. The recent declines in terms of trade, real income growth, and confidence are prompting more cautious behaviour by households and businesses.

All of these factors imply a lower profile for core inflation than had been projected at the time of the last Monetary Policy Report in October.

Several factors are helping to counterbalance the negative drag from the global economic and financial developments. The depreciation of the Canadian dollar will continue to provide an important offset to the effects of weaker global demand and lower commodity prices. As well, money markets and overall credit conditions in Canada are responding to significant and ongoing efforts to provide liquidity to the Canadian financial system.

In light of the weakening outlook for growth and inflation, the Bank of Canada lowered its policy interest rate by a total of 75 basis points in October and by an additional 75 basis points today. These monetary policy actions provide timely and significant support to the Canadian economy.

The Bank will continue to monitor carefully economic and financial developments in judging to what extent further monetary stimulus will be required to achieve the 2 per cent inflation target over the medium term.

The banks did not fully participate:

  • TD, down 50bp, now 3.50%
  • CIBC, down 50bp, now 3.50%
  • Scotia, down 50bp, now 3.50%
  • Royal, down 50bp, now 3.50
  • BMO, down 50bp, now 3.50%

At the penultimate cut, TD threw down the gauntlet by not maintaining the spread; this resulted in a $25-billion liquidity injection, later increased to $75-billion which maintained the historical relationship.

The most recent cut in the overnight rate maintained the spread.

Given that What-Debt? has run away from Parliament, it will be most interesting to see if there is any political reaction to this turn of events. Quick! Call Duceppe so Spend-Every-Penny will know what to oppose!

RY.PR.N Settles Without Incident

December 9th, 2008

The Royal Bank Fixed-Reset 6.25%+350 announced November 24 settled today on good volume and little price movement – a departure from recent norms for which the underwriters will doubtless be grateful!

It traded 389,932 shares in a range of 24.85-05, closing at 25.00-03, 40×177. From the bid of 25.00, the YTW is 5.89% to the limitMaturity, while the yield to the five year call is 6.27%.

RY Raising Significant Equity Capital

December 9th, 2008

When reviewing RY’s 4Q08 Capitalization, I commented:

Royal Bank needs to do some delevering – an equity issue is indicated, since the Equity / RWA ratio is below that of its peers.

Royal Bank has announced:

it has entered into an underwriting agreement with a syndicate of underwriters for the sale of 56,750,000 common shares at $35.25 per share for total gross proceeds of $2.0 billion. The offering is expected to close on December 22, 2008.

The bank has also granted to the underwriters an over-allotment option to purchase, on the same terms, up to a further 8,512,500 common shares. The option is exercisable, in whole or in part, up to 30 days after the closing. The maximum gross proceeds raised under the offering will be $2.3 billion if the option is exercised in full.

As announced on December 5, 2008, the bank’s Tier 1 capital ratio was 9% as of October 31, 2008. Earlier this fiscal quarter, we issued $525 million of Series AL and Series AN Preferred Shares. On a pro forma basis, adjusting for the issue of Series AL and Series AN Preferred Shares and this issue of common shares, the bank expects its Tier 1 capital ratio will be approximately 9.9%, or 10.1% if the over-allotment option is exercised in full.

This is great news!

December 8, 2008

December 9th, 2008

American pension funds begged for relief from having to top up their accounts:

Pension funds at Pfizer Inc., International Business Machines Corp., United Parcel Service Inc. and dozens of other companies have joined the parade of businesses seeking relief from Congress amid this year’s economic meltdown.

Instead of money, they want legislation to suspend a federal law that would make them pump billions of dollars into retirement plans to offset stock-market losses as many struggle to find enough cash just to stay in business. They’re pressing Congress to consider the issue this week before this year’s session adjourns.

It’s another difficult question of mark-to-market vs. whatever-other accounting! Frankly, I think the entire defined-benefit paradigm is dead – or if not dead, should be.

In a rather chilling development, specific bank credit decisions are being politicized:

Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich said today the state would suspend its business with Bank of America Corp. until the lender restores credit to the shuttered Republic Windows & Doors company in Chicago where workers are staging a sit-in.

Blagojevich commented at a news conference after meeting with employees who have stayed at the factory since Dec. 5, when it closed after the bank canceled its line of credit. Illinois does “hundreds of millions of dollars” in business with the bank, he said.

Three-month US T-Bills are now trading at less than a beep:

The Treasury sold $27 billion in three-month bills at the lowest rate since it starting auctioning the securities in 1929 amid record demand for the safety of U.S. debt during the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

The bills were sold at a high discount rate of 0.005 percent, the Treasury said today in Washington. At last week’s auction, the bills drew a rate of 0.05 percent. The government received bids for the bills totaling more than triple the amount sold.

There is a report of another chapter in the BCE saga:

BCE Inc. told would-be acquirers that it received an auditor’s opinion showing the company would be solvent after the C$52 billion purchase by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan and a group of U.S. private-equity firms, according to two people briefed on the matter.

The opinion, delivered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, is contrary to an analysis by rival accounting firm KPMG LLC.

Hmm … I wonder if the same deal can go the Supreme Court twice!

Sorry, folks! I’m just plain out of time, so there is no volume or price-change table today. I will point out though, that the SplitShare sector was on fire today, with strength pretty much across the board.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30.
The Fixed-Reset index was added effective 2008-9-5 at that day’s closing value of 1,119.4 for the Fixed-Floater index.
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Fixed-Floater 7.09% 7.43% 87,773 13.18 6 +1.6424% 744.9
Floater 9.56% 9.85% 68,374 9.53 2 +0.4077% 370.8
Op. Retract 5.53% 6.99% 141,821 4.05 15 -0.1799% 978.1
Split-Share 6.94% 13.23% 71,831 3.94 14 +6.0720% 885.9
Interest Bearing 9.17% 18.04% 56,659 2.87 3 +2.7985% 798.7
Perpetual-Premium N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Perpetual-Discount 7.76% 7.88% 206,837 11.55 71 +1.7398% 712.9
Fixed-Reset 6.07% 5.42% 1,125,193 14.41 16 +1.3936% 987.2

IMF Releases December 2008 Issue of Finance & Development

December 9th, 2008

The IMF has released its December 2008 Issue of Finance & Development. Articles are:

  • Cracks in the System: Repairing th Damaged Global Economy
  • F&D on Financial Crisis Origins
  • Preventing Future Crises
  • When Crises Collide
  • A Crisis to Remember
  • Global Financial Turmoil Tests Asia
  • The Crisis through the Lens of History
  • Ensuring Food Security
  • Stockholm Solutions
  • Neighborly Investments
  • The Road to Recovery: A View from Japan
  • Nigeria’s Shot at Redemption
  • The Catch-Up Game
  • The Economic Geography of Regional Integration

To be frank, I wasn’t much impressed by the Stockholm Solutions article about the Nordic crisis. It was very general.

A topic more suited to generality was The Crisis through the Lens of History:

A second important lesson is the value of providing macroeconomic support in parallel with financial actions. With the effectiveness of monetary policy limited by financial disruptions, fiscal stimulus must play an important role to help maintain the momentum of the real economy and curtail negative feedbacks between the financial and real sectors. Indeed, increasing interest is now being paid to boosting infrastructure spending, akin to the public work programs of the Depression era. But, as the Japanese example makes clear, macroeconomic support by itself provides only breathing room, not a cure; it is essential to use the space provided to address the underlying financial problems or the outcome will be a series of fiscal packages with diminishing impact. And it should also be recognized that there will be limited space for macroeconomic responses in countries where the weakness of public sector management has been an integral source of the problem, as has often been the case in emerging market crises.

Additionally, the article on Preventing Future Crises contains many of the familiar old nostrums but, as a saving grace, adds an element I’ve been harping on:

Safeguarding diversity to promote systemic complementarities
The degree to which financial institutions with long maturing liabilities (for example, pension funds and life insurance companies) should be subject to mark-to-market requirements or to risk management standards based on risk models focused on short-run price volatility in managing
their assets could be reconsidered. Regulations could increase the scope for such institutions to play the role of long-term, hold-to-maturity investors. But low-leverage financial institutions with limited systemic importance may need only light, if any, regulation, thus allowing them to play a potentially stabilizing role in taking more risky or contrarian positions compared with other market participants (Nugée and Persaud, 2006).

I’ve said it before … I’ll say it again. The current crisis has shown significant cracks in bank regulation, but let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. What we should be aiming for is a rock solid banking system core, surrounded in turn by more exciting investment banks, which are in turn surrounded by a wild-n-wooly world of hedge funds, SIVs, and whatever else gets dreamed up to make a buck.