Archive for December, 2006

Strange Strength in SXT.PR.A

Wednesday, December 6th, 2006

What’s up with this issue? It’s not in the HIMI Preferred Indices (at the moment, anyway) due to volume considerations, but today it traded 41,832 shares and closed at 25.90-95, 78×20. AND it went ex-dividend today. Maybe to you and me, that means the price should go down, but not this time!

What makes this strange is that the pre-tax YTW on this issue is now -4.66% [that’s NEGATIVE 4.66% if the word-wrap on your browser is misbehaving!], based on the bid of $25.90 and a redemption call 2007-4-14 at $25.00. If it lasts until its scheduled hardMaturity 2011-3-15, then it will have yielded +4.76%, but just how likely is this contingency, anyway?

When we look at the financials, available via Scotia Managed Companies, we find the following history of units outstanding:

SXT.PR.A Units Outstanding
Date Units
Issue, 2001-3-12 7,500,000
2003 -107,540
2004 -492,059
2005 -2,161,719
2006 -3,202,804
Remaining 1,535,878

Which in the first place goes a long way towards explaining why the issue no longer qualifies for index inclusion on volume considerations and in the second place demonstrates that the capital unit holders aren’t exactly shy about redeeming units. Scotia says that the SXT Capital Units had a NAVPS of $19.61 as of December 5 … the market didn’t do much today, so say that’s constant … SXT closed at $19.23-84, 40×50.

There will always be those who disagree, of course, but it seems to me that the increase in the Capital Units’ intrinsic value from about $17 last March to the current figure, together with the fact that the Capital Units were trading at a discount to intrinsic value of about 7-8% immediately following the last redemption, that has now been reduced to about 2%, makes the probability of redemption extremely high. Scotia has a great little feature on their website whereby a user can plot the intrinsic value and the market value and the discount over time. Have a look. Same pattern: discount goes to about 8% following the redemption period, increases gradually to about the current figure, then there’s a whacking great redemption.

Given that, I wouldn’t be paying $25.90 for these shares!

As I’ve said before, the world would be a better place if more split share corporations’ preferred shares had some degree of call protection via premia on early-call prices.

I’ve attached two graphs of data over the past year: Flat Bid Price and Yield-to-Worst. Check the glossary for explanations of flatBidPrice and yieldToWorst.

ASC.PR.A : Rights Offering and DBRS Upgrade

Wednesday, December 6th, 2006

Here’s a switch!

AIC Global Financial Split Corp. has announced a rights offering, giving unit holders the opportunity to subscribe for additional units. Given that ASC (the capital units) closed at $16.25 today and ASC.PR.A closed at $10.52, it would appear that the offering should be successful and the company will issue additional units worth about $9.3-million.

The decision to issue more units makes all kinds of sense to me: the fund had total assets of only about $41-million as of the last annual report, dated 2005-12-31. Issuing more units should result in increased liquidity for the unitholders – not to mention increased fees for the manager!  It’s a cheap way to raise money for a split share fund, according to the prospectus disclosure of fees:

Proceeds from the Subscription for Units to the Company: Approximately $9,295,625 after deduction of expenses of the Offering estimated at $290,000 inclusive of all fees and commissions which could be payable by the Company pursuant to the Soliciting Dealer Group Agreement (as hereinafter defined) between the Company and National Bank Financial Inc. (the “Dealer Manager”) which provides that the Company will pay a fee of $100,000 to the Dealer Manager plus a subscription fee of $0.30 per Unit in respect of each subscription procured by a member of the Soliciting Dealer Group (as hereinafter defined). See “Soliciting Dealer Group”.

So AIC expects to receive $9,295,625 of the total $9,585,625 paid by the ultimate owners. In other words, they’re raising this money with an efficiency of 96.97%. We can compare this to the efficiency of the 5Banc reissue, where they expect to see $285,850,000 of the total $300-million, for an efficiency of 95.28%.

Equity analysts and other such good-for-nothing spendthrifts will doubtless pooh-pooh an efficiency increase of 1.69% absolute, but here in this blog we’re fixed income analysts and know better. Pennies Count! And when these pennies are left inside the company, they help our credit quality!

Just to make things more exciting, DBRS announced today that the credit rating of the ASC.PR.A has been increased to Pfd-2(high) from Pfd-2, which should help sales a bit. The prospectus claims that this occurred on November 28, 2006, but the DBRS press release is dated today, December 6. The prospectus itself is dated November 30, so it’s all rather mysterious. I regret to say I don’t know the DBRS policy on giving committments to issuers and making these committments public.

 The HIMIPref™ database has been updated with the new creditRatingDataRecord effective tomorrow, December 7, 2006.

More later.

Later, more : ASC.PR.A currently has an AFTER-TAX YTW of 3.34% based on a bid of $10.52 and a hardMaturity 2011-05-31 at $10.00. The curvePrice is $10.76 evaluated under the after-tax curve. The PRE-TAX bid-YTW is 4.19%.

BDS.PR.A Partial Call for Redemption

Wednesday, December 6th, 2006

This is BG Income + Growth Split Trust, a preferred security not tracked by HIMIPref™ … but I’ll report on its partial redemption call just for fun anyway!

According to their prospectus, the prefs had good call protection:

Preferred Securities also may be called by the Trust and purchased prior to the Maturity Date (the “”Call Right”), at a price per Preferred Security which until May 31, 2005 will be equal to $10.40 and which will decline by $0.10 each year thereafter to $10.00 after May 31, 2008, plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

Now some of them have been called:

The call of Preferred Securities represents approximately 18.3% of the outstanding Preferred Securities. The Preferred Securities will be called on a pro rata basis such that each holder of Preferred Securities of record on December 6, 2006, as per the records of the Canadian Depository for Securities Limited (CDS), will have approximately 18.3% of their Preferred Securities redeemed. The total redemption amount for the Preferred Securities will be $10.33587 per security, which represents a price of $10.30 plus interest from the date of the last distribution to December 6, 2006.

Given that the maturity is May 31,2009 … call it 2.5 years away … we can say, roughly that a price of 10.30 equates to a call yield of 4.7%. So – the pref holders did fine.

Some of the holders did really well! I see a volume spike – such as it is! – on November 13, when the closing price was over $10.60, and a close of over $10.80 on November 24.

Definately, the world would be a better place if all split-share preferred had some call-protection via premia on the call price.

December 5, 2006

Tuesday, December 5th, 2006
Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.26% 4.27% 36,532 16.91 1 +0.1622% 1,019.9
Fixed-Floater 4.80% 3.71% 96,007 6.65 7 +0.1917% 1,031.8
Floater 4.46% -21.20% 61,799 6.57 5 +0.0080% 1,038.3
Op. Retract 4.63% -0.95% 81,820 2.21 17 -0.0563% 1,032.6
Split-Share 5.11% 2.92% 152,466 2.73 8 +0.1561% 1,040.9
Interest Bearing 6.89% 5.76% 73,261 2.36 7 +0.1581% 1,026.0
Perpetual-Premium 5.02% 3.45% 259,049 4.63 51 -0.0192% 1,050.6
Perpetual-Discount 4.58% 4.58% 1,006,272 16.28 6 +0.0004% 1,047.9
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
FFN.PR.A SplitShare +1.2195% Well, I didn’t understand it on November 30 and I don’t understand it now. Why is this stuff trading at such stratospheric levels? At the closing bid of $10.79, it has a pre-tax bid-YTW of 2.50% based on a hard maturity 2009-12-01 – bond equivalent is 3.50%, less than treasury bills! The capital units closed today at $15.38-49 and the last NAVPU was November 30, 2006 at $26.67. Hmmm … according to their prospectus, the prefs are not redeemable. You can only submit a matched unit in October. The price of a matched pair today is $26.17, total, at the bid, almost 1.9% below the NAV. Or, it could be that capital units have been submitted for regular monthly retraction, at 96% of 26.67, which is $25.60, less the price to the company of buying the pref, which we’ll call $10.79, leaving $14.81, which isn’t enough to make sense unless banks have really shot through the roof! Well, either people are bidding up the prefs to settle down and wait for next October’s concurrent retraction (buying units at a 2% discount to Nov 30’s NAV) or … the market is nuts. One or the other, as far as I can see.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
CM.PR.I PerpetualPremium 124,154 Recent new issue, pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.66% based on a bid of $25.20 and a call 2016-3-1 at $25.00.
SLF.PR.D PerpetualDiscount 48,801 Recent blue-light special, pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.57% based on a bid of $24.30 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 27,260 Recent new issue, pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.79% based on a bid of $24.96 and a limitMaturity.
SLF.PR.C PerpetualDiscount 21,993 Virtually identical to the SLF.PR.D mentioned above – same coupon & credit – and, if anything, should be priced slightly lower than SLF.PR.D since the redemption schedule starts earlier. But it closed at $24.60 bid, good for a pre-tax YTW of 4.52% based on a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.G PerpetualPremium 20,120 At the closing bid of $27.11, it has a pre-tax YTW of 4.07% based on a call 2010-5-31. Since it pays $1.35, there’s at least some chance it hanging on longer while the bank saves $0.25 as the redemption price declines – if it’s called 2014-5-31 at $25.00, it will have yielded 4.19%, which doesn’t seem worthwhile. Still, of all the perpetualPremium issues in the index, there is nothing out there with a higher price AND a higher YTW. The average volume is impressive, as well, nearly double the nearest-in-volume of its higher-priced competitors. It would be most interesting to compare this with a retractible … it may be that somebody is simply assuming that it will be called and is willing to pay up for that certainty … see How Long is Forever? for an explanation of how that game works.

There were eight other index-included issues with over 10,000 shares traded today.

December 4, 2006

Monday, December 4th, 2006
Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.28% 4.29% 38,041 16.89 1 -0.7646% 1,018.2
Fixed-Floater 4.81% 3.82% 98,094 6.65 7 +0.1698% 1,029.8
Floater 4.47% -20.72% 62,146 6.59 5 -0.0700% 1,038.2
Op. Retract 4.63% -1.03% 82,481 2.21 17 +0.0306% 1,033.1
Split-Share 5.11% 2.94% 156,248 2.73 8 +0.3847% 1,039.2
Interest Bearing 6.90% 5.71% 72,389 3.87 7 +0.0198% 1,024.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.01% 3.39% 261,734 4.63 51 +0.0271% 1,050.8
Perpetual-Discount 4.58% 4.58% 1,015,140 14.71 6 +0.0677% 1,047.9
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
LBS.PR.A SplitShare +1.7757 Recovering from yesterday – and then some! Pre-tax bid-YTW is 3.89% based on a bid of $10.89 and a hardMaturity at $10.00 2013-11-29
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
SLF.PR.D PerpetualDiscount 230,717 Recent blue-light special.
CM.PR.R OpRet 154,380 Desjardins crossed 100,000 at $27.15, then another 51,600 at the same price about three and a half hours later. I’d like to meet the purchaser, shake his hand, take him out to dinner, talk a little business and maybe sell him the rights to the Toronto Airport Bridge. The pre-tax bid-YTW is 1.97% based on a bid of $26.95 and a call 2008-5-30 at $25.75. The purchaser may be hoping it hangs on until its softMaturity 2013-4-29 at $25.00, at which point it will have yielded 3.77%, but really! The thing pays $1.238 and CIBC just issued a perpetual that paid only 1.175. You can stretch a point, talk about the savings that CIBC will realize by waiting, adjust the “effective cost”, hope that nobody notices that you’re comparing it with a perpetual and that CIBC would probably pay less than a buck per share per annum on a new retractible … but to get what? 3.77% at the bid? There’s other fish in the sea. Comparable yields computed from the closing ask price of $27.19 are 1.34% and 3.60%.
CM.PR.I PerpetualPremium 135,607 Recent new issue, pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.66% based on a call 2016-3-1 at $25.00.
ELF.PR.G PerpetualPremium 37,600 Recent new issue that continues to amaze me with a closing quotation of $25.60-65, pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.53% based on a call 2015-11-16 at $25.00. DBRS rates this as Pfd-2(low), so you sure aren’t getting much yield increment for the credit spread!
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 37,495 Recent new issue, pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.79% based on a limitMaturity. It pays $1.1875, exactly the same as the ELF.PR.G mentioned above. Same credit rating. I love this market!

There were seven other index-included issues with over 10,000 shares traded today.

EN.PR.A Partial Redemption

Monday, December 4th, 2006

I will admit to being fascinated at the prospect of client retractions of income-trust-based split share corporations over the next few months.

Energy Split II Corporation has announced that only about 1.547% of the preferred shares outstanding will be redeemed in order to match Capital Units tendered separately.

This is much less than I would have expected; as shown on the company’s website, the NAV got hammered in the aftermath of the Hallowe’en Massacre, with the Capital Units losing almost 28% of their NAV from the October 26 valuation to November 30. They mature next December anyway; it is interesting to note that the only prior redemption possibility, in 2005 after a year on the market, called only about 5.4% of the shares outstanding.

However, they somehow managed to continue trading at a premium to NAV – as much as 33% as measured on November 2 – and so it was in the interest of Capital Unitholders to sell in the marketplace rather than retract – to the tune of almost 5% on November 30.

The prefs don’t trade much (averageTradingValue of just over $5,000) and are not eligible for recommendation by HIMIPref™ since pseudoModifiedDuration (Cost) of buy side less than minimum setting : the pseudoModifiedDurationCost is 0.886 and the minimum setting in the current parameterization is 1.020.

Still, y’know: These things have a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.22% based on their hard-maturity on 2007-12-16 at $25 (because those who buy prior to the ex-date of 2006-12-12 will be getting five dividend payments in a year-and-a-few-days) so some hopeful souls may wish to put in a bid at $25.01, given that the current quotation is $25.00-$26.00, 54×1.

Royal Bank New Issue: 4.5% Perp

Monday, December 4th, 2006

Royal Bank has announced a new issue of 4.5% Perpetuals – I am advised that the redemption schedule commences 2012-2-24 at $26.00, but have not yet confirmed this.

This would not appear, at first blush, to be a particularly attractive issue considering the most obvious comparables. Reasonable, but not particularly attractive:

Recent RY Perpetuals
Issue Dividend Rate Quote 11/30
RY.PR.A 4.45% 24.98-00
RY.PR.B 4.70% 25.90-22
RY.PR.C 4.60% 25.35-37

More later.

Later, more:

Royal Bank Perpetuals
Analysis Using AFTER-TAX Curve (except as noted)
Curve price Component RY.PR.A RY.PR.B RY.PR.C RY.PR.W RY.PR.?
Price due to base-rate 23.12 23.91 23.69 24.44 23.29
Price due to short-term 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.05
Price due to long-term 0.56 0.59 0.57 0.61 0.54
Price to to Cumulative Dividends 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Price due to Liquidity 1.46 1.50 1.49 0.66 1.49?
Price due to error -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.02 -0.00
CurvePrice 25.16 26.01 25.77 25.74 25.36
Annual Dividend 1.1125 1.1750 1.1500 1.2250 1.1250
2006-12-01 Quote 25.00-08 25.90-09 25.40-50 26.45-52 Issue: $25.00
After-tax Bid YTW 3.55% 3.37% 3.54% 3.19% 3.58%
Pre-Tax Bid YTW 4.47% 4.24% 4.46% 4.01% 4.50%

 

Tax has been included in the calculation of the elements of the above table in accordance with the Ontario Highest Marginal Rate.

This issue has been added to the HIMIPref™ database on a preIssue basis with the securityCode P75000.

5Banc Split New Issue

Saturday, December 2nd, 2006

The 5Banc Split Inc. new issue has been added to the HIMIPref™ database.

The anticipated closing date is 2006-12-15; it pays 4.75% as a cumulative dividend; it’s provisionally rated Pfd-2 by DBRS; and it’s a split share backed by … (wait for it) … five banks! BMO, BNS, CM, RY & TD are the portfolio shares.

I had a hard time deciding whether or not to include this issue in the database. It’s redeemable annually at the $10 issue price and I don’t like that. It means, for one thing, that the YTW will almost always be based on a call at the next annual date (assuming it trades at a premium, which, with a 4.75% dividend, seems likely for the forseeable future). I like the system whereby a declining schedule is put in place … like, f’rinstance, BSD.PR.A has. I’d be prepared to give up a little coupon for such a feature (how much? Consultancy can be easily arranged at a moderate fee).

In the end, I decided – sure, let’s include it. After all, it’s just replacing the FBS.PR.A and given that I expect a lot of redemptions over the next few years, I’d like to ensure I have a lot of issues with some history at all times, just to maintain continuity of the calculations.

The annual no-fee no-pain redemption feature for the capital units just creates a lot of churn (which may be the point, given that the selling commission is 3% on the prefs, 6% on the capital units.). This is a refinancing for 5Banc, with the old capital units eligible for tax-free conversion into the new capital units; the historical units outstanding have been:

5Banc Split Inc. Unit Activity
Date Units
2001-12-28 (Issue) +3,250,000
2002 -168,855
2003 -1,408,167
2004 -605,827
2005 -254,044
For Redemption 2006-12-15 813,107

The dividend is certainly attractive and the issue should go to a premium immediately after issue – and the underwriters are selling the prefs separately. The upside is limited by the very onerous redemption schedule, though, and I calculate a curvePrice of $10.26 (excluding liquidity considerations). One thing to remember about this kind of issue is that redemption will be driven by Capital Unitholders trying to cash in on the Next Big Thing – it will not necessarily have anything to do with prevailing interest rates. You could get redeemed (and receive the $10 par value) if rates are at 10% and the prefs are trading at $7.50. I can’t model that possibility though, and I wouldn’t count on it!

The preIssue securityCode for this issue is P50008.

MAPF Returns : November, 2006

Saturday, December 2nd, 2006

The monthly return for Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund has been calculated.
The unit price as of November 30, 2006, was $9.8314

Returns may therefore be calculated as:

Period Ending November 30, 2006 Return (see Note)
Month +1.74%
Quarter +3.71%
Year +6.61%
Two Years (Annualized) +6.51%
Three Years (Annualized) +9.22%
Four Years (Annualized) +14.22%
Five Years (Annualized) +10.87%
MAPF returns are shown after expenses, but before fees.

Note that past performance should not be taken as a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in MAPF or any other investment.

“But what about risk?” you ask, and I’m glad you asked that question. All issues held in the portfolio are rated Pfd-2(low) or better by DBRS. 43% are rated Pfd-1(low) or better, the remainder are rated Pfd-2(low) or better.

The composition of the portfolio in terms of the HIMI Preferred Indices as of November 30, 2006 is:

Index MAPF Composition
Ratchet 0%
Fixed-Floater 0%
Floating Rate 0%
OpRet 25%
SplitShare 23%
InterestBearing 0%
PerpetualPremium 34%
PerpetualDiscount 20%
Cash -2%

The nice thing about the returns is that they have been virtually entirely dividends and capital gains, resulting in a generally lower tax rate than for interest for most taxable investors.
The fund is available only to accredited investors in Ontario. If you are a Canadian accredited investor not in Ontario with a substantial amount of money to invest, contact me and we can discuss the possibility of Hymas Investment Management Inc. (HIMI) applying for registration in your province or territory.
For more information and documents regarding the fund, see the HIMI website

CIBCWM Likes Prefs

Saturday, December 2nd, 2006

The current issue of Canadian Portfolio Strategy Outlook has a few things to say about prefs:

While trust valuations are likely to bounce back, trust market issuance will be restricted by the new regulations. Hence investors’ search for yield is likely to lead them to new instruments in 2007. A resurgence in preferred share issuance may be one of the new vehicles to pick up the slack.

I’ve been saying this for a while now – every time a trust blew up, in fact – but now the line is being picked up by the majors. I hope that doesn’t mean it’s not likely any more.

An important advantage of preferred shares for taxable investors is that the income, in contrast to the coupon stream from a bond, qualifies for the dividend tax credit. All the more so given Federal tax changes that lowered the effective tax rate on dividend income from 31% to 25% starting this year. Since 2004 preferred shares have offered a higher yield than even long Canada bonds. The average yield at present on Canadian preferred shares is about 5%, versus 4.0% for the GoC 30-year bond and about 4.7% for the typical Canadian corporate bond (Chart 7). However, on an after-tax basis, the spread against the long Canada rises to 150 bps, (Chart 8 ) a huge yield pickup for investors able to tolerate the somewhat larger degree of repayment risk.

I wish I knew where to pick up a basket of good quality prefs yielding an average 5%, but I guess that’s one of the things you learn when you work for a bank. And I think they could have been more specific about taxation. Still – it’s nice to see an organization that has an actual marketting budget talking about these things!