Archive for March, 2011

March 2, 2011

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

DBRS has released a commentary titled Sovereign Ratings Provide a Benchmark for other DBRS Credit Ratings:

  • Sovereign credit ratings serve as a general benchmark for all other DBRS credit ratings. DBRS uses a case-by-case approach when rating non-sovereign entities or transactions, and avoids using a static “sovereign ceiling” concept, because this would imply that ratings are capped at the sovereign rating. DBRS does not institute a maximum number of notches between the sovereign rating and non-sovereign ratings.
  • Financial institution and corporate ratings are typically constrained by the sovereign rating, although both could have a higher credit rating that that of the central government, with the level of operations outside of the country of domicile typically being a key consideration. Structured Finance ratings are addressed on a case-by-case basis and in many instances can be higher than the sovereign rating.
  • In certain cases, country risks, which do not necessarily result in sovereign rating changes, may also affect non-sovereign ratings.
  • Within the Euro zone, non-sovereign ratings may enjoy a lower degree of influence from sovereign-related stresses, since there is far lower exchange rate risk, less regulatory risk and existing support mechanisms from European institutions.

It was a mixed day on the Canadian preferred share market, as PerpetualDiscounts were up 10bp, FixedResets gained 6bp, but DeemedRetractibles got knocked back for 16bp. Not much volatility, with only two issues on the Performance Highlight list. Volume was above average.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.61%, equivalent to 7.28% at the now standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long Corporates now yield about 5.5%, so the pre-tax interest equivalent spread is now about 180bp. Given the change in the equivalency factor, this is not really comparable to prior figures; the raw data for February 23 was 5.61% for PerpetualDiscounts and 5.50 for Long Corporates, so the change is really zero.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1549 % 2,389.9
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1549 % 3,594.4
Floater 2.51 % 2.27 % 46,275 21.55 4 -0.1549 % 2,580.5
OpRet 4.87 % 3.58 % 59,276 0.40 9 0.0086 % 2,392.3
SplitShare 5.09 % 2.79 % 230,587 1.05 5 0.2252 % 2,482.1
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0086 % 2,187.5
Perpetual-Premium 5.74 % 5.54 % 131,810 6.19 10 -0.0536 % 2,033.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.51 % 5.61 % 127,283 14.41 14 0.1032 % 2,118.8
FixedReset 5.21 % 3.48 % 197,756 3.00 54 0.0635 % 2,279.6
Deemed-Retractible 5.23 % 5.24 % 379,719 8.28 53 -0.1605 % 2,080.3
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
SLF.PR.B Deemed-Retractible -1.40 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.18
Bid-YTW : 5.69 %
CIU.PR.B FixedReset 1.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.35
Bid-YTW : 3.76 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
SLF.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 81,904 RBC crossed blocks of 26,000 and 48,600, both at 21.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.85
Bid-YTW : 6.03 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 62,609 RBC crossed 58,000 at 25.45.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-07-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.35
Bid-YTW : 3.91 %
RY.PR.F Deemed-Retractible 60,741 TD crossed 50,000 at 23.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.68
Bid-YTW : 5.13 %
BNS.PR.O Deemed-Retractible 56,070 RBC crossed 50,000 at 25.66.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-05-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.78
Bid-YTW : 5.14 %
CM.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 55,580 Desjardins crossed 40,000 at 25.65.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.61
Bid-YTW : 1.90 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 52,676 RBC bought 17,500 from Scotia at 25.45 and crossed 20,900 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-02-29
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.46
Bid-YTW : 4.08 %
There were 40 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
MFC.PR.B Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.59 – 22.88
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1765

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.59
Bid-YTW : 5.86 %

MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible Quote: 21.93 – 22.22
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1862

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.93
Bid-YTW : 6.06 %

GWO.PR.F Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.05 – 25.34
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1990

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-10-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.05
Bid-YTW : 5.50 %

ELF.PR.F Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.45 – 22.79
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2679

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.45
Bid-YTW : 6.77 %

TRP.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 25.55 – 25.99
Spot Rate : 0.4400
Average : 0.3679

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.55
Bid-YTW : 3.90 %

CM.PR.K FixedReset Quote: 26.62 – 26.95
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2589

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.62
Bid-YTW : 3.53 %

New Issue: BMO FixedReset 3.90%+115

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

The Bank of Montreal has announced:

a domestic public offering of $250 million of Non-Cumulative 5-year Rate Reset Class B Preferred Shares Series 25 (the “Preferred Shares”). The offering will be underwritten on a bought deal basis by a syndicate led by BMO Capital Markets. The Bank has granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional $50 million of the Preferred Shares exercisable at any time up to two days before closing.

The Preferred Shares will be issued to the public at a price of $25.00 per Preferred Share and holders will be entitled to receive non-cumulative preferential fixed quarterly dividends for the initial period ending August 25, 2016, as and when declared by the board of directors of the Bank, payable in the amount of $0.24375 per Preferred Share, to yield 3.90 per cent annually.

Thereafter, the dividend rate will reset every five years to be equal to the 5-Year Government of Canada Bond Yield plus 1.15 per cent. Subject to certain conditions, holders may elect to convert any or all of their Preferred Shares into an equal number of Non-Cumulative Floating Rate Class B Preferred Shares Series 26 on August 25, 2016 and on August 25 of every fifth year thereafter. Holders of the Preferred Shares Series 26 will be entitled to receive non-cumulative preferential floating rate quarterly dividends, as and when declared by the board of directors of the Bank, equal to the then 3-month Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 1.15 per cent.

The anticipated closing date is March 11, 2011. The net proceeds from the offering will be used by the Bank for general corporate purposes.

There is a long first coupon on this ($0.4461 payable August 25) so mark your calendars – there might be some trading opportunities!

I haven’t seen anything definitive yet, but I believe this will be the first issue with the new NVCC Clause; I will be most interested to see just exactly what it looks like.

They also announced a announced a new issue of sub-debt:

it intends to issue subordinated indebtedness under its Canadian Medium Term Note Program. The issue, the Series G Medium Term Notes, First Tranche, is a $1.5 billion public offering due 2021. Interest on this issue is payable semi-annually at a fixed rate of 3.979% until July 8, 2016, and at a floating rate equal to the rate on 3 month CDOR plus 1.09% (paid quarterly) thereafter to maturity.

Bank of Montreal may, at its option, with the prior approval of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada, redeem the subordinated indebtedness, in whole or in part, on not less than 30 days and not more than 60 days notice to registered holders, at any time or from time to time on or after July 8, 2016 at par together with accrued and unpaid interest to but excluding the date fixed for redemption.

The net proceeds of the offering, which is expected to close on March 9, 2011, will be used for general corporate purposes of Bank of Montreal.

This makes things doubly interesting, because OSFI expects different treatment of different levels of capital should the NVCC clause be triggered. I presume they’ve consulted with OSFI regarding the wording of the two clauses; these issues could well set the paradigm.

Update, 2011-3-8: The sub-debt prospectus supplement on SEDAR (Mar 4 2011 Prospectus supplement – English) states:

The Notes may not fully qualify as non-common Tier 2 capital under new Canadian bank capital guidelines.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has announced new international bank capital adequacy rules (commonly called Basel III) which will amend the existing Basel II capital management framework. The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions of Canada (‘‘OSFI’’) has announced that it plans to adopt the new Basel III rules for purposes of Canadian bank capital guidelines. Under the new Basel III rules, effective January 1, 2013, all non-common Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital instruments issued by a bank must have, either in their contractual terms and conditions or by way of statute in the issuer’s home country, a clause requiring a full and permanent conversion into common shares of such bank upon certain trigger events at the point where such bank is determined to be no longer viable. The Notes as a result may not fully qualify as non-common Tier 2 capital under the new capital rules as no such conversion mechanism exists. For purposes of being included in the Bank’s regulatory capital under the new capital rules, the Notes would be phased out beginning January 31, 2013 (their recognition will be capped at 90% of total Tier 2 capital from January 1, 2013, with the cap reducing by 10% in each subsequent year). As a result, the Bank may, with the prior approval of the Superintendent, redeem the Notes in accordance with their terms.

The similarly available prospectus for the preferreds states:

Under the new Basel III rules, effective January 1, 2013, all non-common Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital instruments issued by a bank must have, either in their contractual terms and conditions or by way of statute in the issuer’s home country, a clause requiring a full and permanent conversion into common shares of such bank upon certain trigger events at the point where such bank is determined to be no longer viable. The Preferred Shares Series 25 as a result may not fully qualify as non-common Tier 1 capital under the new capital rules as no such conversion mechanism exists. As a result, the Bank may, with the prior approval of the Superintendent, redeem the Preferred Shares Series 25 in accordance with their terms.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has announced new international bank capital adequacy rules (commonly called Basel III) which will amend the existing Basel II capital management framework. The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions of Canada (‘‘OSFI’’) has announced that it plans to adopt the new Basel III rules for purposes of Canadian bank capital guidelines. Under the new Basel III rules, effective January 1, 2013, all non-common Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital instruments issued by a bank must have, either in their contractual terms and conditions or by way of statute in the issuer’s home country, a clause requiring a full and permanent conversion into common shares of such bank upon certain trigger events at the point where such bank is determined to be no longer viable. The Preferred Shares Series 25 and, if and when issued, the Preferred Shares Series 26 as a result may not fully qualify as non-common Tier 1 capital under the new capital rules as no such conversion mechanism exists. For purposes of being included in the Bank’s regulatory capital under the new capital rules, the Preferred Shares Series 25 and the Preferred Shares Series 26 would be phased out beginning January 31, 2013 (their recognition will be capped at 90% of total Tier 1 capital from January 1, 2013, with the cap reducing by 10% in each subsequent year). As a result, the Bank may, with the prior approval of the Superintendent, redeem the Preferred Shares Series 25 and the Preferred Shares Series 26, if any, in accordance with their respective terms.

Marginal Tax Rates: Alberta 2011

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

E&Y have analyzed Alberta tax rates as of 2011-1-15 and we may draw some conclusions from these data:

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 25.00% 0.00% 1.33
Professionals $75,000 32.00% 7.85% 1.36
Plutocrats $150,000 39.00% 17.72% 1.35

Equivalency factors have declined marginally since my 2010 post on this topic.

Two nuances should be noted. Firstly, E&Y appears to have put a floor of 0.00% on the published marginal tax rate for dividends; in fact, the tax on dividends can be negative if the taxpayer has other income available to soak up the excess dividend tax credit. This will increase the equivalency factor for “Widows & Orphans”.

Secondly, if the taxpayer is subject to OAS clawback, the equivalency factor will decline by about 0.1. It should be noted that this figure is an extremely rough estimate and is based solely on the direct income tax effect – there may be other net-income-tested benefits to the taxpayer, such as drug plans, which will exacerbate the decline.

Marginal Tax Rates: BC 2011

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

E&Y have analyzed British Columbia tax rates as of 2011-1-15 and we may draw some conclusions from these data:

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 20.06% 0.00% 1.25
Professionals $75,000 32.50% 8.11% 1.36
Plutocrats $150,000 43.70% 23.91% 1.35

Equivalency factors have declined marginally since my 2010 post on this topic.

Two nuances should be noted. Firstly, E&Y appears to have put a floor of 0.00% on the published marginal tax rate for dividends; in fact, the tax on dividends can be negative if the taxpayer has other income available to soak up the excess dividend tax credit. This will increase the equivalency factor for “Widows & Orphans”.

Secondly, if the taxpayer is subject to OAS clawback, the equivalency factor will decline by about 0.1. It should be noted that this figure is an extremely rough estimate and is based solely on the direct income tax effect – there may be other net-income-tested benefits to the taxpayer, such as drug plans, which will exacerbate the decline.

Marginal Tax Rates: Ontario 2011

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

E&Y have analyzed Ontario tax rates as of 2011-1-15 and we may draw some conclusions from these data:

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 20.05% 0.00% 1.25
Professionals $75,000 32.98% 11.72% 1.32
Plutocrats $150,000 46.41% 28.19% 1.34

Equivalency factors have declined slightly since my 2010 post on this topic

Two nuances should be noted. Firstly, E&Y appears to have put a floor of 0.00% on the published marginal tax rate for dividends; in fact, the tax on dividends can be negative if the taxpayer has other income available to soak up the excess dividend tax credit. This will increase the equivalency factor for “Widows & Orphans”.

Secondly, if the taxpayer is subject to OAS clawback, the equivalency factor will decline by about 0.1. It should be noted that this figure is an extremely rough estimate and is based solely on the direct income tax effect – there may be other net-income-tested benefits to the taxpayer, such as drug plans, which will exacerbate the decline.

SXT.PR.A Maturity Confirmed

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

Sixty Split Corp. has announced:

The Board of Directors of Sixty Split Corp. has declared today an ordinary dividend of $0.3563 per Preferred Share payable on March 15, 2011 to holders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2011.

Holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to receive quarterly fixed cumulative distributions equal to $0.3563 per Preferred Share.

The Capital Shares and Preferred Shares will be redeemed by the Company on March 15, 2011 (the “Redemption Date”) in accordance with the redemption provisions of the shares. Pursuant to these provisions, the Preferred Shares will be redeemed at a price per share equal to the lesser of $25.00 and the net asset value per Unit. The Capital Shares will be redeemed at a price per two Capital Shares equal to the amount by which the net asset value per unit exceeds $25.00. The net asset value per unit was $68.86 as at March 1, 2011.

Holders of Capital Shares who requested to receive their redemption payment in portfolio securities and gave notice to this effect and tendered $25.00 for every two Capital Shares by February 14, 2011 will receive their pro rata share of the portfolio securities. The redemption of Capital Shares and Preferred Shares will constitute a taxable disposition of the Company’s shares at the time of the redemption whether the payment is received in the form of cash or portfolio securities.

A further press release will be issued by the Company in connection with the redemption prices on March 14, 2011. Payment of the amounts due to holders of Capital Shares and Preferred Shares will be made by the Company on March 15, 2011.

Sixty Split Corp. is a mutual fund corporation created to hold a portfolio of common shares and income funds of the companies and trusts that make up the S&P/TSX 60 Index. Capital Shares and Preferred Shares of Sixty Split Corp. are listed for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols SXT and SXT.PR.A respectively.

Update, 2011-3-14:Final redemption prices

March 1, 2011

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has released a Staff Report by Olivier Armantier, Eric Ghysels, Asani Sarkar, and Jeffrey Shrader titled Stigma in Financial Markets: Evidence from Liquidity Auctions and Discount Window Borrowing during the Crisis:

We provide empirical evidence for the existence, magnitude, and economic impact of stigma associated with banks borrowing from the Federal Reserve’s discount window facility. We find that, during the height of the financial crisis, banks were willing to pay an average premium of at least 37 basis points (and 150 basis points after Lehman’s bankruptcy) to borrow from the Term Auction Facility rather than from the discount window. The incidence of stigma varied according to bank characteristics and market conditions. Finally, we find that discount window stigma is economically relevant since it increased banks’ borrowing costs during the crisis. Our results have important implications for the provision of liquidity by central banks.

Also released was a Staff Report by Maria Kasch and Asani Sarkar titled Comovement Revisited:

We find, unlike earlier studies, that there is no rise in the market betas of stocks that enter the S&P 500 index when the estimated factor model is that of Fama and French (1993). We also find that SMB and HML factor betas decline after the stocks are added to the index. This decline is explained by strong increases in earnings and in the market value of the event stocks in the period around―and, in particular, prior to―their inclusion in the index. We suggest that inclusions to the S&P 500 index are informative events that trigger a reassessment of the risk of newly added firms by drawing the broad market’s attention to their extraordinary growth in size and profitability.

It was a good day in the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts up 16bp, FixedResets gaining 3bp and DeemedRetractibes winning 11bp. Above-average volume.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2149 % 2,393.6
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2149 % 3,600.0
Floater 2.50 % 2.27 % 47,918 21.55 4 0.2149 % 2,584.5
OpRet 4.87 % 3.57 % 61,583 1.34 9 0.1505 % 2,392.1
SplitShare 5.11 % 3.39 % 233,266 1.05 5 0.5769 % 2,476.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1505 % 2,187.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.74 % 5.54 % 125,265 2.49 10 0.0854 % 2,034.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.51 % 5.60 % 128,167 14.42 14 0.1642 % 2,116.6
FixedReset 5.21 % 3.52 % 199,373 3.00 54 0.0296 % 2,278.1
Deemed-Retractible 5.22 % 5.21 % 385,017 8.29 53 0.1101 % 2,083.7
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
CIU.PR.B FixedReset -1.21 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.00
Bid-YTW : 4.19 %
BAM.PR.O OpRet 1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.00
Bid-YTW : 3.59 %
NA.PR.L Deemed-Retractible 1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.64
Bid-YTW : 5.08 %
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-03-01
Maturity Price : 22.72
Evaluated at bid price : 22.90
Bid-YTW : 5.37 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-03-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.79
Bid-YTW : 3.79 %
GWO.PR.M Deemed-Retractible 1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.40
Bid-YTW : 5.52 %
BNA.PR.E SplitShare 2.58 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2017-12-10
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.22
Bid-YTW : 5.42 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TD.PR.M OpRet 169,711 Nesbitt sold blocks of 10,000 and 22,300 to RBC, both at 25.65. Nesbitt sold blocks of 13,600 and 36,400 to Desjardins at 25.65. Nebit crossed 50,000 at 25.65; RBC crossed 25,500 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.70
Bid-YTW : 2.98 %
BMO.PR.P FixedReset 119,302 Desjardins crossed 20,000 at 26.70; Nesbitt crossed blocks of 40,300 and 25,000, both at 26.70. TD crossed 15,000 at 26.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-03-27
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.70
Bid-YTW : 3.61 %
SLF.PR.F FixedReset 108,086 Desjardins crossed 100,000 at 26.80.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.75
Bid-YTW : 3.70 %
BNS.PR.O Deemed-Retractible 77,881 Nesbitt crossed blocks of 50,000 and 25,000, both at 25.66.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-05-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.65
Bid-YTW : 5.24 %
TD.PR.R Deemed-Retractible 59,997 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 25.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.72
Bid-YTW : 5.18 %
SLF.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 54,872 Desjardins crossed 50,200 at 23.23.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.15
Bid-YTW : 5.65 %
There were 43 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
IAG.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 26.75 – 28.24
Spot Rate : 1.4900
Average : 0.8440

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.75
Bid-YTW : 4.02 %

GWO.PR.M Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.40 – 25.83
Spot Rate : 0.4300
Average : 0.2739

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.40
Bid-YTW : 5.52 %

FTS.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 25.68 – 26.10
Spot Rate : 0.4200
Average : 0.2761

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-10-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.68
Bid-YTW : 4.10 %

CIU.PR.B FixedReset Quote: 27.00 – 27.50
Spot Rate : 0.5000
Average : 0.3757

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.00
Bid-YTW : 4.19 %

IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.26 – 22.78
Spot Rate : 0.5200
Average : 0.4014

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.26
Bid-YTW : 5.96 %

TRP.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 25.58 – 25.97
Spot Rate : 0.3900
Average : 0.2888

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.58
Bid-YTW : 3.86 %

FBS.PR.B Upgraded to Pfd-3(high) by DBRS

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

Dominion Bond Rating Service has announced that it:

has today upgraded the rating of the Class B Preferred Shares (the Preferred Shares) issued by 5Banc Split Inc. (the Company) to Pfd-3 (high) from Pfd-3. In December 2006, the Company issued 14 million Preferred Shares at $10 each and an equal number of Class B Capital Shares (the Capital Shares) at $10 each. The final redemption date for the Preferred Shares and Capital Shares is December 15, 2011.

The rating of the Preferred Shares was last confirmed on August 10, 2010. Since then, the net asset value (NAV) of the Company has increased by approximately 9%. The current downside protection (as of February 24, 2011) is approximately 49%. The upgrade of the rating of the Preferred Shares is primarily based on the increased downside protection since August 2010 and the fairly short term to final redemption of the Preferred Shares.

The main constraints to the rating are the following:

(1) The downside protection provided to holders of the Preferred Shares is dependent on the value of the shares in the Portfolio.

(2) Volatility of price and changes in the dividend policies of the Canadian banks may result in significant reductions in downside protection from time to time.

(3) The Portfolio is entirely concentrated in the Canadian financial services industry.

FBS.PR.B was last mentioned on PrefBlog when there was a partial redemption call in December 2009. FBS.PR.B is tracked by HIMIPref™, but is relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

Ups and Downs of Doing the Splits

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

John Heinzl’s Investor Clinic in the Globe is titled Ups and Downs of Doing the Splits and addresses the question: What are split shares exactly, and are they a good investment?

He starts of really well:

Because split shares can get a bit tricky, we’ve invited one of Canada’s leading preferred share experts, James Hymas of Hymas Investment Management in Toronto, to share his expertise.

Dear Sirs: Please extend my Globe & Mail subscription …

Most of it’s pretty basic. My favourite part was when I was asked ‘Who buys Capital Units?’:

For those reasons, Mr. Hymas says the capital shares are only appropriate for “suckers.”

“They’re for people who like to pay high fees, and they’re for people who like to take a lot of risk, and they’re for people who can’t read a prospectus properly,” he says.