Archive for December, 2011

December 12, 2011

Monday, December 12th, 2011

The European governments need the banks, because the banks buy their debt. Guess who the banks depend on?

European banks turning to their governments to raise required capital could trigger a downward spiral of declining sovereign-debt prices and further losses for the lenders.

The European Banking Authority ordered the region’s banks on Dec. 8 to raise 115 billion euros ($154 billion) by June. Faced with dwindling profits and unable to tap capital markets to sell new shares, firms may be forced to seek government help. About 70 percent of the capital requirement falls on lenders in Spain, Greece, Italy and Portugal, countries struggling to convince the world they can pay their debts.

“If the Southern governments put money in their banks, their sovereign debt will go up, exacerbating their problems,” said Karel Lannoo, chief executive officer of the Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels. “Then the banks’ losses will rise because they hold the government debt. That’s a vicious cycle. It’s hard to know which one to stabilize first, the sovereign bonds or the banks.”

Moody’s blue:

European leaders unveiled a blueprint after meetings on Dec. 8 and 9 for a closer fiscal accord to save the euro, adding 200 billion euros to their bailout fund and tightening rules to curb future debts. They also agreed to start a 500 billion-euro rescue fund next year.

The agreement offered few new measures and doesn’t diminish the risk of credit-ranking revisions, Moody’s said in its Weekly Credit Outlook. “In the absence of any decisive policy initiatives that stabilize credit-market conditions effectively, our intention as announced in November is to revisit the level and dispersion of ratings during the first quarter of 2012,” the company said.

Bad news from Sino-Forest:

The company won’t be able to publish the earnings within the 30-day period stated on Nov. 15, Hong Kong- and Mississauga, Ontario-based Sino-Forest said today in a statement. There’s no assurance if or when the results will be released, it said. Sino-Forest also said a report by an independent committee into the fraud allegations now won’t be issued until 2012, instead of the year-end as previously stated.

Sino-Forest said it decided it won’t make a $9.78 million interest payment on its 2016 convertible notes that’s due Dec. 15. The company said it retained Houlihan Lokey and Bennett Jones LLP as its financial and legal advisers to assist in the evaluation of its options.

“In these circumstances, the board has determined that it must consider all strategic options available,” the company said in the statement. “The company may consider obtaining other sources of capital, including through the recapitalization of the company or the sale of some or all of its business.”

A lot of the fuss could be – could! – simply hysteria. That’s just people talking. But not being able to produce financials, another delay in the special committee report and skipping an interest payment … that’s real.

The Republicans are going to love this:

China may use tax cuts to shore up expansion in the second-largest economy next year as export growth weakens and the threat of bad loans from stimulus spending narrows the government’s options.

Another thing that’s real is Sun Life retreating from the US:

Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF), Canada’s third-largest insurer, plans to stop selling variable annuities and individual life insurance products in the U.S. and will cut 800 jobs there as it shifts focus to Canada and Asia. The stock had its biggest gain in more than two years.

Sun Life expects to record costs of about C$75 million ($73 million) to C$100 million from the changes, a portion of which will be in the fourth quarter, the Toronto-based company said today in a statement. The insurer will also take a writedown of about C$97 million.

Variable annuities, which provide guaranteed incomes to customers regardless of market performance, have led to losses at Sun Life and bigger rival Manulife Financial Corp. (MFC) after equities plunged. Sun Life’s U.S. insurance unit had losses of C$569 million in the third quarter, and C$279 million in the first nine months of 2011.

The common soared, but the preferreds were actually down on good volume!

DBRS commented:

Over the past several years, volatility has highlighted SLF’s economic exposure to the capital markets from guarantees written on variable annuities and embedded interest rate guarantees associated with life insurance products. However, the Company’s ability to mitigate these market fluctuations is limited by the disadvantageous accounting and regulatory capital treatment faced by Canadian life insurance companies, especially with regard to these long-tailed products. Since U.S.-based competitors have not faced the same disadvantage, the ability of Canadian companies to compete on a level playing field in these increasingly commoditized product lines has deteriorated. Despite recent efforts to de-risk, re-price and hedge these products, the cost to the Company in terms of capital allocation charges and earnings volatility, combined with cost and product disadvantages, has been deemed by the management team under new Sun Life CEO Dean Connor to be unsustainable. As of December 30, 2011, sales of these products will therefore cease.

While reduced exposure to the U.S. variable annuity and individual life markets makes good sense from a capital and earnings perspective, DBRS recognizes that the Canadian life insurance industry continues to move away from its core and unique expertise in life underwriting in favour of more commoditized and more competitive wealth management products that require less regulatory capital.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts gaining 4bp, FixedResets down 1bp and DeemedRetractibles losing 12bp. Volatility was good, mostly on the down side. Volume was low.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.3484 % 2,045.4
FixedFloater 4.87 % 4.61 % 34,789 17.10 1 -1.6625 % 3,166.4
Floater 3.24 % 3.55 % 65,229 18.32 3 -0.3484 % 2,208.5
OpRet 4.91 % 3.05 % 57,555 1.42 6 -0.2179 % 2,468.1
SplitShare 5.83 % 6.85 % 59,229 5.10 3 -0.7322 % 2,516.1
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2179 % 2,256.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.50 % 2.92 % 90,968 0.86 18 0.2238 % 2,166.6
Perpetual-Discount 5.23 % 5.15 % 105,413 15.08 12 0.0413 % 2,313.9
FixedReset 5.10 % 3.03 % 221,207 2.52 64 -0.0102 % 2,340.2
Deemed-Retractible 5.04 % 4.32 % 194,199 3.38 46 -0.1244 % 2,227.2
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater -1.66 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-12
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.52
Bid-YTW : 4.61 %
BNA.PR.E SplitShare -1.35 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2017-12-10
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.64
Bid-YTW : 6.85 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset -1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.10
Bid-YTW : 4.25 %
SLF.PR.E Deemed-Retractible -1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.96
Bid-YTW : 6.73 %
GWO.PR.H Deemed-Retractible -1.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.40
Bid-YTW : 5.69 %
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.86 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-12
Maturity Price : 24.20
Evaluated at bid price : 24.70
Bid-YTW : 4.66 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
SLF.PR.C Deemed-Retractible 29,465 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.83
Bid-YTW : 6.75 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 21,677 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-12
Maturity Price : 14.95
Evaluated at bid price : 14.95
Bid-YTW : 3.55 %
ENB.PR.D FixedReset 21,635 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-12
Maturity Price : 23.15
Evaluated at bid price : 25.16
Bid-YTW : 3.61 %
SLF.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 20,193 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.10
Bid-YTW : 6.37 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 19,075 RBC crossed 17,200 at 25.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-12
Maturity Price : 23.45
Evaluated at bid price : 25.68
Bid-YTW : 2.89 %
SLF.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 18,776 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.83
Bid-YTW : 6.75 %
There were 19 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
ELF.PR.G Perpetual-Discount Quote: 21.30 – 22.02
Spot Rate : 0.7200
Average : 0.6353

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-12
Maturity Price : 21.30
Evaluated at bid price : 21.30
Bid-YTW : 5.67 %

CM.PR.I Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.90 – 26.20
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2238

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.90
Bid-YTW : 3.97 %

BAM.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 25.40 – 25.64
Spot Rate : 0.2400
Average : 0.1686

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-12
Maturity Price : 23.23
Evaluated at bid price : 25.40
Bid-YTW : 4.26 %

HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.42 – 25.73
Spot Rate : 0.3100
Average : 0.2421

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.42
Bid-YTW : 4.94 %

BNA.PR.E SplitShare Quote: 22.64 – 22.94
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2401

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2017-12-10
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.64
Bid-YTW : 6.85 %

CIU.PR.B FixedReset Quote: 26.91 – 27.45
Spot Rate : 0.5400
Average : 0.4839

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.91
Bid-YTW : 3.56 %

BCE.PR.K Reopening: Ridiculous Rip-Off Wrinkle

Monday, December 12th, 2011

BCE Inc. has announced:

that it has entered into an agreement to issue and sell 10,000,000 Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AK (series AK preferred shares), at a price of $25.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $250 million on a bought deal basis to a syndicate led by RBC Capital Markets, BMO Capital Markets and TD Securities Inc. This offering constitutes an additional issuance to the 13,800,000 series AK preferred shares that BCE initially issued on July 5, 2011.

The underwriters have also been granted an over-allotment option to purchase, at the offering price, up to an additional 1,200,000 series AK preferred shares exercisable until the date that is 30 days following the closing. Should the over-allotment be fully exercised, the total gross proceeds of the offering will be $280 million.

The series AK preferred shares will have the same terms and conditions as the existing series AK preferred shares and will pay on a quarterly basis (with the first quarterly dividend to be paid March 31, 2012), for the initial fixed rate period ending December 31, 2016, if, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE, a fixed cash dividend of $0.25938. The dividend rate will be reset on December 31, 2016 and every five years thereafter at a rate equal to the 5-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 1.88%. The series AK preferred shares are redeemable by the issuer on or after December 31, 2016, in accordance with their terms.

Holders of series AK preferred shares have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AL, (series AL preferred shares) subject to certain conditions, on December 31, 2016 and on December 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of series AL preferred shares are entitled to receive quarterly floating adjustable cash dividends at a rate equal to the three-month Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 1.88%.

The series AK preferred shares will be offered for sale to the public in each of the provinces of Canada pursuant to a short form prospectus to be filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities in all Canadian provinces. The offering is scheduled to close on or about January 4, 2012, subject to certain conditions, including obtaining all necessary regulatory approvals.

The net proceeds of this offering will be used for general corporate purposes.

The extant issue traded today slightly above 25.00, but IIROC halted trading shortly before the close.

I’m surprised the underwriters are letting BCE get away with this, but all’s fair in love, war and investments!

BCE.PR.K is a 4.15%+188 FixedReset that began trading in July. At the time of its announcement on June 20, the GOC 5-Year yield was about 2.20%. Since then it has tumbled to about 1.33% … implying that the normal structure would require an Issue Reset Spread of about 275bp if a new issue was done today. Naturally, the company prefers to issue new shares with a spread of 188bp!

One reason the structure evolved the way it did was because of all of the bank issuance – OSFI will allow index-based coupons in Tier 1 Capital, but only if there’s no future step-up implied in the calculation on approval date. I wonder how they feel about step-downs!

I had a number of things to say about the price effect of projected reset rates for discounted and near-par FixedResets in the December edition of PrefLetter which was published early this morning. Correlation or Causation?

Update: DBRS rates Pfd-3(high), Trend Stable.

December PrefLetter Released!

Monday, December 12th, 2011

The December, 2011, edition of PrefLetter has been released and is now available for purchase as the “Previous edition”. Those who subscribe for a full year receive the “Previous edition” as a bonus.

The December edition contains an appendix discussing “Liquidity Black Holes” – violent and brief downturns in the market, aka Flash Crashes.

PrefLetter may now be purchased by all Canadian residents.

Until further notice, the “Previous Edition” will refer to the December, 2011, issue, while the “Next Edition” will be the January, 2012, issue, scheduled to be prepared as of the close January 13 and eMailed to subscribers prior to market-opening on January 16.

PrefLetter is intended for long term investors seeking issues to buy-and-hold. At least one recommendation from each of the major preferred share sectors is included and discussed.

Note: My verbosity has grown by such leaps and bounds that it is no longer possible to deliver PrefLetter as an eMail attachment – it’s just too big for my software! Instead, I have sent passwords – click on the link in your eMail and your copy will download.

Note: The PrefLetter website has a Subscriber Download Feature. If you have not received your copy, try it!

Note: PrefLetter eMails sometimes runs afoul of spam filters. If you have not received your copy within fifteen minutes of a release notice such as this one, please double check your (company’s) spam filtering policy and your spam repository – there are some hints in the post Sympatico Spam Filters out of Control. If it’s not there, contact me and I’ll get you your copy … somehow!

Note: There have been scattered complaints regarding inability to open PrefLetter in Acrobat Reader, despite my practice of including myself on the subscription list and immediately checking the copy received. I have had the occasional difficulty reading US Government documents, which I was able to resolve by downloading and installing the latest version of Adobe Reader. Also, note that so far, all complaints have been from users of Yahoo Mail. Try saving it to disk first, before attempting to open it.

Note: There have been other scattered complaints that double-clicking on the links in the “PrefLetter Download” email results in a message that the password has already been used. I have been able to reproduce this problem in my own eMail software … the problem is double-clicking. What happens is the first click opens the link and the second click finds that the password has already been used and refuses to work properly. So the moral of the story is: Don’t be a dick! Single Click!

December PrefLetter Now in Preparation!

Friday, December 9th, 2011

The markets have closed and the December edition of PrefLetter is now being prepared.

PrefLetter is the monthly newsletter recommending individual issues of preferred shares to subscribers. There is at least one recommendation from every major type of preferred share with investment-grade constituents. The recommendations are taylored for “buy-and-hold” investors.

The December edition will contain an appendix reviewing the concept of “Liquidity Black Holes”.

Those taking an annual subscription to PrefLetter receive a discount on viewing of my seminars.

PrefLetter is now available to all residents of Canada.

The December issue will be eMailed to clients and available for single-issue purchase with immediate delivery prior to the opening bell on Monday. I will write another post when the new issue has been uploaded to the server … so watch this space carefully if you intend to order “Next Issue” or “Previous Issue”! Until then, the “Next Issue” is the December issue.

December 9, 2011

Friday, December 9th, 2011

Moody’s downgraded some French banks:

BNP Paribas SA (BNP), Societe Generale SA and Credit Agricole SA (ACA) had their credit ratings cut by Moody’s Investors Service, which cited funding constraints and deteriorating economic conditions amid Europe’s debt crisis.

Moody’s cut the long-term debt ratings for BNP Paribas and Credit Agricole by one level to Aa3, the fourth-highest investment grade. Societe Generale’s rating was cut to A1, the fifth highest. Moody’s also cut the standalone assessments of financial strength of the three banks, while saying there’s a “very high” chance they will get state support if needed.

“Liquidity and funding conditions have deteriorated significantly,” the ratings company said in a statement. The likelihood that they “will face further funding pressures has risen in line with the worsening European debt crisis.”

The US MMFs have awesome influence:

The eight largest prime U.S. money- market mutual funds cut holdings in French banks by 68 percent in November, shifting investments to Swiss, Swedish, Canadian and Japanese banks.

French bank holdings declined by $11.7 billion to $5.56 billion, according to an analysis of fund disclosures by the Bloomberg Risk newsletter. The eight funds have reduced French bank debt by $76.8 billion in the past 12 months.

Senator Snowe is upset with Amazon:

Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) should end its price- checking promotion because it gives consumers an incentive to gather price data from small retailers and leave stores without spending money, said Senator Olympia Snowe.

The world’s largest online retailer is offering a 5 percent discount to entice users to try a new mobile application that compares prices with physical retailers. The app, called Price Check, allows shoppers to look up Amazon’s prices by scanning products at a store using their phones.

“Amazon’s promotion — paying consumers to visit small businesses and leave empty-handed — is an attack on Main Street businesses that employ workers in our communities,” Snowe, a Maine Republican, said in a statement yesterday. “Small businesses are fighting everyday to compete with giant retailers, such as Amazon, and incentivizing consumers to spy on local shops is a bridge too far.”

That’s right, Senator, competition is un-American.

However, the issue highlights something I’ve been pondering for the past ten-odd years: what is the future of retail? I have a friend who retails computers: he pays more for his inventory than a retail customer can buy for at the big guys. And we’re seeing more and more of this type of thing all of the time.

My suspicion is that retail stores will eventually become show-rooms. For anything that’s not perishable, you’ll go into a store, look at the merchandise and if you like it – you’ll place an order. Then you pick it up a week later – or, perhaps, have it delivered for an extra five bucks.

There’s aways a possibility that retail will disappear completely – for non-perishable items – but I don’t think that will happen. You can’t covet what you don’t know about and people always want to see things. So manufacturers (like Apple) and distributors (like Amazon) will (i) obviously, pay a commission on sales, and (ii) pay a fee for shelf space (which has been the case for years in the grocery industry and, I’m sure, lots of other places). Maybe it’s a relatively low shelf-space fee, then a huge commission on the first sale or two, then the regular commission on more; just to keep the retailers honest.

Doesn’t this make sense? Why should I pay an extra $100 for a television, just so that Future Shop can keep fifty of each model stacked behind their enormous store on expensive urban land? Is it really worth that much to get same-day delivery of my television?

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts gaining 7bp, FixedResets down 3bp and DeemedRetractibles winning 8bp. Volatility was OK. Volume was very low.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.9941 % 2,052.5
FixedFloater 4.79 % 4.50 % 35,352 17.23 1 1.7949 % 3,220.0
Floater 3.23 % 3.52 % 65,370 18.40 3 -0.9941 % 2,216.2
OpRet 4.90 % 1.51 % 59,626 1.43 6 -0.1664 % 2,473.5
SplitShare 5.79 % 6.57 % 59,850 5.12 3 0.3249 % 2,534.6
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1664 % 2,261.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.51 % 3.11 % 91,299 0.86 18 0.0348 % 2,161.7
Perpetual-Discount 5.23 % 5.16 % 105,461 14.89 12 0.0689 % 2,313.0
FixedReset 5.10 % 3.08 % 223,008 2.50 64 -0.0282 % 2,340.4
Deemed-Retractible 5.03 % 4.28 % 194,789 3.32 46 0.0818 % 2,230.0
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater -2.56 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-09
Maturity Price : 19.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.00
Bid-YTW : 2.78 %
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount -1.26 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-09
Maturity Price : 23.76
Evaluated at bid price : 24.25
Bid-YTW : 4.75 %
CIU.PR.B FixedReset -1.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.91
Bid-YTW : 3.55 %
HSB.PR.C Deemed-Retractible 1.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.63
Bid-YTW : 4.71 %
GWO.PR.M Deemed-Retractible 1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.99
Bid-YTW : 5.28 %
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater 1.79 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-09
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.85
Bid-YTW : 4.50 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
ENB.PR.D FixedReset 66,136 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-09
Maturity Price : 23.16
Evaluated at bid price : 25.17
Bid-YTW : 3.61 %
RY.PR.H Deemed-Retractible 65,510 Nesbitt crossed 60,000 at 26.80.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-05-24
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.75
Bid-YTW : 3.55 %
MFC.PR.E FixedReset 51,240 Nesbitt bought 16,500 from RBC at 25.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-09-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.79
Bid-YTW : 4.35 %
BNS.PR.Z FixedReset 36,145 Nesbitt bought 12,400 from RBC at 25.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.97
Bid-YTW : 3.17 %
RY.PR.I FixedReset 33,837 TD crossed 25,200 at 26.06.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.05
Bid-YTW : 3.13 %
TD.PR.Q Deemed-Retractible 26,500 Scotia crossed 25,000 at 26.82.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-01-31
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.84
Bid-YTW : 3.01 %
There were 19 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.25 – 24.82
Spot Rate : 0.5700
Average : 0.4026

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-09
Maturity Price : 23.76
Evaluated at bid price : 24.25
Bid-YTW : 4.75 %

CIU.PR.B FixedReset Quote: 26.91 – 27.45
Spot Rate : 0.5400
Average : 0.4223

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.91
Bid-YTW : 3.55 %

PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 19.00 – 20.00
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.8882

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-09
Maturity Price : 19.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.00
Bid-YTW : 2.78 %

GWO.PR.M Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.99 – 26.30
Spot Rate : 0.3100
Average : 0.2142

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.99
Bid-YTW : 5.28 %

BAM.PR.O OpRet Quote: 25.65 – 26.10
Spot Rate : 0.4500
Average : 0.3557

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.65
Bid-YTW : 3.92 %

GWO.PR.J FixedReset Quote: 26.41 – 26.74
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2407

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.41
Bid-YTW : 2.99 %

December 8, 2011

Friday, December 9th, 2011

Three cheers for BMO!

The consortium, known as Maple Group, wants to buy TMX for $3.8-billion. It also wants to buy privately-held Alpha, TMX’s biggest competitor in the stock market business in Canada, then combine Alpha and TMX into an entity that would be home to more than 80 per cent of all share trading in Canada.

However, the parties are nowhere close on a value for Alpha, according to people familiar with the situation. Maple is offering something in the range of $100-million to $200-million, while Alpha is looking for something in the range of $450-million to $600-million, the people said. The expectation is that the parties will likely have to go to binding arbitration to set a price.

Should regulators block the Alpha deal, Maple has said it will drop plans to buy TMX. On the other side, if TMX thinks Maple is paying too much for Alpha, TMX can back out of the deal to merge with Maple.

What’s more, the Alpha situation is complicated by an interlocking web of conflicts of interest.

Another Alpha shareholder, Bank of Montreal, is not a member of Maple but it is advising TMX on its plan to merge with Maple

DBRS downgraded Spain to AA(low) Trend Negative.

BSD.PR.A was confirmed at Pfd-4(low) by DBRS:

Despite a deterioration in the Portfolio metrics since the previous rating review, specifically with respect to the Preferred Security downside protection (currently at 23.9%, down from 30.6% since December 31, 2010) and dividend yield, DBRS remains comfortable with the current assessment of the Portfolio and the confirmation of the Pfd-4 (low) rating. DBRS will continue to monitor the performance of Brookfield Soundvest Split Trust to determine the required level of downside protection for the assigned rating, and take appropriate action as needed.

The redemption date for the Preferred Securities is March 31, 2015.

Due to collywobbles at TMX DataLinx, the preferred share report has been prepared using Yahoo! data again.

It was a good day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts winning 14bp, FixedResets up 6bp and DeemedRetractible gaining 8bp. Volatility was muted, although Floaters bounced back from yesterday’s debacle. Volume was low.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 2.6447 % 2,073.1
FixedFloater 4.87 % 4.61 % 34,493 17.10 1 -0.3067 % 3,163.2
Floater 3.20 % 3.52 % 66,235 18.39 3 2.6447 % 2,238.4
OpRet 4.90 % 1.51 % 59,645 1.43 6 -0.2107 % 2,477.6
SplitShare 5.81 % 6.60 % 60,371 5.12 3 -0.3659 % 2,526.4
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2107 % 2,265.5
Perpetual-Premium 5.51 % 2.97 % 94,394 0.87 18 0.0011 % 2,161.0
Perpetual-Discount 5.23 % 5.19 % 105,346 15.06 12 0.1415 % 2,311.4
FixedReset 5.10 % 3.06 % 225,975 2.50 64 0.0564 % 2,341.1
Deemed-Retractible 5.04 % 4.30 % 196,960 3.39 46 0.0819 % 2,228.2
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.O OpRet -1.11 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.76
Bid-YTW : 3.62 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-08
Maturity Price : 15.07
Evaluated at bid price : 15.07
Bid-YTW : 3.52 %
PWF.PR.A Floater 2.52 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-08
Maturity Price : 19.50
Evaluated at bid price : 19.50
Bid-YTW : 2.71 %
BAM.PR.K Floater 4.40 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-08
Maturity Price : 14.72
Evaluated at bid price : 14.72
Bid-YTW : 3.61 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
ENB.PR.D FixedReset 177,355 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-08
Maturity Price : 23.15
Evaluated at bid price : 25.16
Bid-YTW : 3.66 %
CM.PR.E Perpetual-Premium 146,788 TD bought 10,000 from Nesbitt at 25.25; Scotia crossed 25,000 at the same price. RBC crossed two blocks of 25,000 each at the same price. TD closed off by crossing 35,000 at the same price again.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 5.13 %
CM.PR.D Perpetual-Premium 97,980 Desjardins crossed 30,000 at 25.69; Scotia crossed blocks of 30,000 and 25,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-01-07
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.67
Bid-YTW : -7.12 %
BMO.PR.H Deemed-Retractible 92,200 National crossed 90,000 at 26.15.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.08
Bid-YTW : 1.86 %
RY.PR.P FixedReset 62,685 TD crossed blocks of 25,000 and 29,800 at 27.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.93
Bid-YTW : 2.76 %
RY.PR.X FixedReset 43,550 RBC crossed blocks of 24,500 and 14,700, both at 27.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.20
Bid-YTW : 2.97 %
There were 26 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
ELF.PR.G Perpetual-Discount Quote: 21.26 – 21.93
Spot Rate : 0.6700
Average : 0.5559

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-08
Maturity Price : 21.26
Evaluated at bid price : 21.26
Bid-YTW : 5.68 %

RY.PR.H Deemed-Retractible Quote: 26.75 – 27.10
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2577

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-05-24
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.75
Bid-YTW : 3.54 %

BAM.PR.O OpRet Quote: 25.76 – 26.10
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2523

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.76
Bid-YTW : 3.62 %

FTS.PR.E OpRet Quote: 27.00 – 27.42
Spot Rate : 0.4200
Average : 0.3325

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 27.00
Bid-YTW : 1.51 %

BAM.PR.G FixedFloater Quote: 19.50 – 20.00
Spot Rate : 0.5000
Average : 0.4233

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-08
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.50
Bid-YTW : 4.61 %

RY.PR.I FixedReset Quote: 26.05 – 26.25
Spot Rate : 0.2000
Average : 0.1324

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.05
Bid-YTW : 3.13 %

DBRS Confirms YLO Preferreds at Pfd-4(low), Trend Negative

Thursday, December 8th, 2011

A mere affirmation of a rating would not normally warrant a dedicated post, but I’ve spent so much of the past six months writing about the issue, it’s worth highlighting.

DBRS confirmed its ratings on YLO today:

DBRS has today confirmed Yellow Media Inc.’s (Yellow Media or the Company) Issuer Rating at BB, its Medium-Term Notes at BB with an RR4 recovery rating, its Exchangeable Subordinated Debentures at B (high) with an RR6 recovery rating and its Preferred Shares at Pfd-4 (low). The trend on its Issuer Rating, debt and preferred shares remains Negative (DBRS lowered its ratings on Yellow Media on September 28, 2011).

DBRS notes that Yellow Media’s unsecured debt has average recovery prospects while its subordinated debt has poor recovery prospects under a base case default/recovery scenario. As such, DBRS has confirmed Yellow Media’s Medium-Term Notes recovery rating at RR4 (30% to 50% expected recovery) with an instrument rating of BB and confirmed its Exchangeable Subordinated Debentures recovery rating at RR6 (0% to 10% expected recovery) with an instrument rating at B (high).

From a financial risk perspective, DBRS notes that Yellow Media’s limited financial flexibility and liquidity are compounded by little access to the capital markets. This puts the Company in a position of being largely reliant on its internally generated free cash flow as its primary source of liquidity to repay its debt maturities. While DBRS notes that reduced debt in 2011 (largely paid for with proceeds from the sale of Trader Corporation and LesPAC Inc., as well as free cash flow), the lower resulting interest expense and the reduction and ultimate elimination of its common share dividend in Q4 2011 will help in terms of free cash flow, these will only partially offset the aforementioned pressure on EBITDA as the print-to-digital transition continues. Despite these factors, DBRS expects the Company should be able to generate free cash flow of $200 million or more per year (DBRS has assumed cash taxes are paid in the year they are incurred) in 2012. However, DBRS notes that over the four years from 2013 to 2016, roughly two-thirds of Yellow Media’s total debt ($1.9 billion as at September 30, 2011) matures. In 2013, the Company faces its largest maturity year (likely to be approximately $400 million) as its credit facility matures in February, followed by notes in July and December.

DBRS notes that Yellow Media must demonstrate meaningful traction with its digital transition while attaining additional liquidity to help with refinancing needs to keep its Issuer Rating in the BB range. Alternatively, should its transition take longer while print pressure continues to accelerate, Yellow Media may not have the ability to handle its debt maturities by means of internally generated free cash flow as they mature.

Separately, the commercial paper rating was withdrawn:

DBRS had today discontinued its Commercial Paper rating of Yellow Media Inc. (Yellow Media or the Company) after all of the Company’s outstanding commercial paper was repaid upon maturity in November 2011.

DBRS does not expect Yellow Media to issue commercial paper in the near term.

YLO has four listed issues of preferred shares: YLO.PR.A and YLO.PR.B (OperatingRetractible) and YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D (FixedReset). All are tracked by HIMIPref™; all are relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

These issues were last mentioned on PrefBlog when S&P downgraded them to P-4(low).

BoC Releases December 2011 Financial Stability Review

Thursday, December 8th, 2011

The Bank of Canada has released the Financial Stability Review for December 2011 with articles:

  • Risk Assessment
    • Macrofinancial Conditions
    • Key Risks
      • Global Sovereign Debt
      • Economic Downturn in Advanced Economies
      • Global Imbalances
      • Low Interest Rate Environment in Major Advanced Economies
      • Canadian Household Finances
    • Safeguarding Financial Stability
  • Strengthening Bank Management of Liquidity Risk:
    The Basel III Liquidity Standards

  • A Fundamental Review of Capital Charges Associated
    with Trading Activities

Click for Big

Market-making activity has decreased, with U.S. primary-dealer inventories of corporate bonds falling in recent months (Chart 4).

It remains to be seen whether this is a normal reaction to the ebb and flow of trading activity, or whether the Volcker Rule – and all the other rules that have been introduced in the past few years – have permanently damaged corporate bond market liquidity.


Click for Big

European banks’ access to U.S.-dollar funding has again come under mounting pressure, motivating the ECB to enhance its program to provide U.S.-dollar liquidity. Since European banks hold large amounts of assets denominated in that currency, they have a significant and persistent need for U.S.-dollar funding. This was heightened in recent months as U.S. money market mutual funds reduced their positions in European bank debt (Chart 10), shortened the maturities of their loans to euro-area banks and placed limits on overall counterparty credit exposure. In September, the ECB announced three 3-month U.S.-dollar liquidity operations, allowing financial institutions to secure financing in U.S. dollars beyond the year-end, which is typically a period when funding needs rise owing to seasonal factors. In addition, 1-week U.S.-dollar liquidity operations, which were set to expire in August 2011, have been extended until August 2012.


Click for Big

With tensions in U.S.-dollar funding markets particularly acute as a result of rising counterparty concerns in Europe (Chart 11), a group of six central banks, including the Bank of Canada, took action on 30 November to extend U.S.-dollar swap lines with the U.S. Federal Reserve to 1 February 2013. The rate was lowered by 50 basis points, and the network of swap lines was expanded to include bilateral swaps among all pairs of currencies to provide financing if needed. For a number of the central banks involved, including
the Bank of Canada, the U.S.-dollar swap lines have been precautionary in nature, but the ECB has made use of its swap facility to provide U.S.-dollar financing to European banks.

So, obviously, if your requirements are killing you, the best thing to do is reduce your requirements, right? That’s what has the Canadian banks salivating:

This deleveraging is likely to be accelerated by the requirement to boost core Tier 1 capital to 9 per cent of risk-weighted assets by mid-2012, which was announced as part of the 26 October package of measures. Given market conditions, it seems likely that the higher capital ratios will be achieved at least in part through asset sales, as well as retained earnings and capital issuance. In an extreme scenario where only asset sales are used, up to €2.5 trillion of disposals would be required to raise core Tier 1 capital ratios to 9 per cent by next June as agreed to by euro-area leaders. Based on last year’s earnings, and assuming that no dividends are paid, the lower bound for asset sales would be €1.4 trillion.

Asset sales are likely to be concentrated in non-core business lines. For instance, there are reports that European banks have been selling assets in emerging-market economies.

Some European banks are also selling U.S.-dollar assets, which has the advantage of reducing the funding-currency
mismatch that has plagued them for the past several years.

With recent quarterly results, banks have also announced a number of cost-cutting measures, including downsizing trading desks and other capital market operations. This raises the possibility of a marked decrease in their market-making activities, especially since this appears to be a strategy being used by many banks in Europe and abroad.

Somewhat surprisingly, the FSR points out that the Europeans might have shot themselves in the foot:

Positions in credit default swap (CDS) markets are used to hedge sovereign risk exposures. Since a credit event triggering payments on sovereign CDSs would entail losses for institutions that have sold credit protection, there is a risk that this could be an important channel of contagion to other markets and institutions. At the same time, the usefulness of such protection is called into question by recent proposals for voluntary writedowns of Greek sovereign debt by 50 per cent without triggering a credit event. The resulting inability to hedge exposures to sovereign credit risk could further reduce investor demand for these securities.

Cheery news for pensioners:


Click for Big

… and for those (ahem!) with high exposure to insurers:

Recent market developments have had a similar negative impact on the life insurance sector. Some large Canadian insurers reported sizable losses in
the third quarter, reflecting the impact of lower interest rates, the decline in equity markets and revisions to actuarial assumptions. The recent market turmoil has also intensified sensitivities to market risk. Equity hedging strategies designed to help mitigate the impact on profit and loss will be less effective under very stressful financial market conditions to the extent that these strategies may be subject to basis and counterparty risk. These issues are especially challenging for firms that have been more aggressive in providing guarantees on investment products and in operating with greater asset-liability mismatches.

To my disappointment, the article by Grahame Johnson on capital charges in the trading book glosses over what I consider to have been the most egregious, and most easily fixed, element of regulatory failure in the run-up to the Panic of 2007: the fact that regulators do not impose a surcharge on trading book positions based on the age of those positions:

Drawing the boundary between the trading book and the banking book on the basis of intent has proven to be vulnerable to misuse. Trading intent is extremely difficult
either to define or to enforce; as such, there is a risk that some assets that might not be readily tradable (or hedgeable) will be held in the trading book. As well, there is a potential for regulatory arbitrage, where firms move positions into whatever classification provides the most favourable capital treatment.

This incentive to move positions can work in both directions. For example, credit exposures generally require a lower amount of capital if held in the trading book (given the use of internal models that allow for the benefits of hedging). This provides a strong motivation to securitize credit and hold it in the trading book, even if it is ultimately impossible to sell the exposure. The banking book, on the other hand, does not require assets to be marked to market, which would allow institutions to avoid recognizing (temporary) losses. For securities that have seen sharp declines in market price (which the bank views as temporary), there is an incentive to move these positions to the banking book, where the short-term loss would not have to be recognized. Highly rated sovereign government bonds present an example of this second arbitrage opportunity. In a volatile market, a portfolio of high-grade sovereign bonds could require a significant capital charge in the trading book (based on movements in the market price of the bonds); yet if the holding was moved to the banking book, the securities would have a risk weight of zero and would therefore require no capital.

In addition, long term readers will remember that I also advocate a certain separation of function: banks should declare whether they are primarily traders or primarily bankers, and face a surcharge on their capital requirements for their secondary function.

December 7, 2011

Thursday, December 8th, 2011

FortisBC Energy (formerly Terasen; now owned by Fortis, proud issuer of FTS.PR.C & FTS.PR.E (OperatingRetractible), FTS.PR.F (PerpetualPremium), and FTS.PR.G & FTS.PR.H (FixedReset)) has issued 30-year paper at 4.25%.

DBRS has confirmed BIG.PR.B and BIG.PR.C at Pfd-2:

On December 9, 2010, DBRS confirmed the ratings on the Preferred Shares at Pfd-2. However since that time, the net asset value and downside protection available to the Preferred Shares has declined due to general market instability. This decline has affected several sectors, including the financial services industry, which is the primary investment sector for Big 8 Split Inc. Downside protection has decreased to 56.7% from 62.6% since December 2010 (the S&P/TSX Composite Bank Index declined 5.9% and the S&P/TSX Composite Insurance Index declined 18.8% over the same period). In addition, based on the current dividend yield on the Portfolio, the current Preferred Share dividend coverage ratio is approximately 1.5 times. Despite the recent downturn, DBRS remains comfortable confirming the current Pfd-2 ratings of the Preferred Shares, primarily because of the sufficient level of downside protection and dividend coverage available in the transaction, as well as the credit quality and consistency of dividend distributions of the Portfolio holdings.

The BoC maintained the overnight rate:

The Bank of Canada today announced that it is maintaining its target for the overnight rate at 1 per cent. The Bank Rate is correspondingly 1 1/4 per cent and the deposit rate is 3/4 per cent.

Uncertainty around the global economic outlook has increased in the weeks since the Bank released its October Monetary Policy Report (MPR). Conditions in global financial markets have deteriorated as the sovereign debt crisis in Europe has deepened. Additional measures will be required to contain the European crisis. The recession in Europe is now expected to be more pronounced than the Bank had anticipated in October, as a result of increased deleveraging and tighter financial conditions, as well as necessary fiscal austerity and structural reforms.

On balance, recent economic indicators in Canada suggest that growth in the second half of this year is slightly stronger than the Bank projected in October. Household expenditures have more momentum than had been expected and business investment remains solid. Going forward, the weaker external outlook is expected to dampen GDP growth in Canada through financial, confidence and trade channels. The economy also continues to face competitiveness challenges, including the persistent strength of the Canadian dollar.

Although total CPI inflation has been slightly higher than projected, the Bank continues to expect the inflation rate to decline as a result of reduced pressures from food and energy prices and ongoing excess supply in the economy. Core inflation has also been slightly firmer than projected and is expected to ease as the output gap persists well into 2013.

Floaters didn’t do very well today – maybe a little bit of capitulation by the prophets of the inflation apocalypse?

It was a good day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts winning 15bp, FixedResets up 7bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 9bp. Volatility was OK; volume was average.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.19%, equivalent to 6.75% at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates are now a little under 4.80%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (also called the Seniority Spread) is now 195bp, a significant tightening from the 210bp reported November 30 as PerpetualDiscounts have come in.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -2.0200 % 2,019.7
FixedFloater 4.86 % 4.59 % 35,716 17.13 1 0.3077 % 3,172.9
Floater 3.28 % 3.56 % 67,090 18.30 3 -2.0200 % 2,180.8
OpRet 4.89 % 0.99 % 59,091 1.44 6 0.2240 % 2,482.8
SplitShare 5.79 % 6.73 % 61,103 5.12 3 0.2823 % 2,535.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2240 % 2,270.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.51 % 3.02 % 94,346 0.87 18 0.1731 % 2,161.0
Perpetual-Discount 5.24 % 5.19 % 106,632 15.01 12 0.1452 % 2,308.1
FixedReset 5.10 % 3.14 % 228,010 2.46 64 0.0709 % 2,339.8
Deemed-Retractible 5.04 % 4.39 % 195,066 3.82 46 0.0915 % 2,226.3
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.K Floater -5.24 % Not to be taken seriously. It’s simply a matter of the bid disappearing after the issue traded 8,225 shares in a range of 14.76-90, last trade at 14.81.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-07
Maturity Price : 14.10
Evaluated at bid price : 14.10
Bid-YTW : 3.77 %
BAM.PR.B Floater -1.52 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-07
Maturity Price : 14.90
Evaluated at bid price : 14.90
Bid-YTW : 3.56 %
MFC.PR.F FixedReset 1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.96
Bid-YTW : 3.96 %
ENB.PR.A Perpetual-Premium 1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-01-06
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.10
Bid-YTW : -40.97 %
BAM.PR.O OpRet 1.72 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.05
Bid-YTW : 2.85 %
IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 1.81 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.55
Bid-YTW : 5.89 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
CM.PR.E Perpetual-Premium 71,556 Desjardins bought two blocks from Nesbitt, 10,000 and 13,900 shares, both at 25.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.23
Bid-YTW : 5.21 %
TD.PR.E FixedReset 57,145 RBC crossed 50,000 at 27.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.06
Bid-YTW : 2.94 %
BNS.PR.O Deemed-Retractible 56,300 Scotia crossed 50,000 at 26.82.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-26
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.82
Bid-YTW : 3.44 %
ENB.PR.D FixedReset 55,330 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-07
Maturity Price : 23.15
Evaluated at bid price : 25.14
Bid-YTW : 3.67 %
RY.PR.H Deemed-Retractible 46,878 Nesbitt crossed 40,000 at 26.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-05-24
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.68
Bid-YTW : 3.73 %
TD.PR.R Deemed-Retractible 46,006 Scotia crossed 40,000 at 26.87.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-30
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.87
Bid-YTW : 3.31 %
There were 36 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.K Floater Quote: 14.10 – 14.99
Spot Rate : 0.8900
Average : 0.5471

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-07
Maturity Price : 14.10
Evaluated at bid price : 14.10
Bid-YTW : 3.77 %

RY.PR.G Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.25 – 25.61
Spot Rate : 0.3600
Average : 0.2408

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-05-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 4.31 %

BAM.PR.G FixedFloater Quote: 19.56 – 19.99
Spot Rate : 0.4300
Average : 0.3392

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-07
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.56
Bid-YTW : 4.59 %

BAM.PR.H OpRet Quote: 25.40 – 25.71
Spot Rate : 0.3100
Average : 0.2239

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-01-06
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.40
Bid-YTW : -0.82 %

TCA.PR.X Perpetual-Premium Quote: 52.61 – 52.89
Spot Rate : 0.2800
Average : 0.2014

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-10-15
Maturity Price : 50.00
Evaluated at bid price : 52.61
Bid-YTW : 3.02 %

RY.PR.T FixedReset Quote: 27.15 – 27.44
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.2142

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.15
Bid-YTW : 3.04 %

BAF.PR.C Firm on Reasonable Volume

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

Bell Aliant has announced:

that its subsidiary, Bell Aliant Preferred Equity Inc. (the “Company”), has closed the sale of 4,600,000 4.55% Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Series C Preferred Shares (the “Series C Preferred Shares”) at a price of $25.00 per Series C Preferred Share for total gross proceeds of $115 million. This follows the Company’s previously announced bought deal public offering led by RBC Capital Markets, Scotia Capital and BMO Capital Markets, and includes the exercise in full by the syndicate of underwriters of their over-allotment option. The Series C Preferred Shares begin trading on the TSX under the symbol “BAF.PR.C” today.

BAF.PR.C is a FixedReset, 4.55%+309, announced November 21. BAF.PR.C will be tracked by HIMIPref™, but relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

The issue traded 151,545 shares today in a range of 24.75-00 before closing at 25.00-06, 8×24.

Vital statistics are:

BAF.PR.C FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-12-07
Maturity Price : 23.14
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 4.38 %