Archive for March, 2013

March PrefLetter Now In Preparation

Saturday, March 9th, 2013

The markets have closed and the March edition of PrefLetter is now being prepared.

PrefLetter is the monthly newsletter recommending individual issues of preferred shares to subscribers. There is at least one recommendation from every major type of preferred share with investment-grade constituents. The recommendations are taylored for “buy-and-hold” investors.

The March edition may contain an appendix updating the data regarding tax effects on high-coupon FixedResets. Or it may not! I’ll know for sure late on Sunday …

Those taking an annual subscription to PrefLetter receive a discount on viewing of my seminars.

PrefLetter is now available to all residents of Canada.

The March issue will be eMailed to clients and available for single-issue purchase with immediate delivery prior to the opening bell on Monday. I will write another post when the new issue has been uploaded to the server … so watch this space carefully if you intend to order “Next Issue” or “Previous Issue”! Until then, the “Next Issue” is the March issue.

March 8, 2013

Saturday, March 9th, 2013

The US reported a good jobs number:

ob growth surged last month as automakers, builders and retailers pushed the unemployment rate to a four-year low, defying concerns that budget battles in Washington would harm the economic expansion.

Employment rose 236,000 last month after a revised 119,000 gain in January that was smaller than first estimated, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington. The median forecast of 90 economists surveyed by Bloomberg projected an advance of 165,000. The jobless rate dropped to 7.7 percent, the lowest since December 2008, from 7.9 percent.

This was echoed in Canada:

Canada’s see-sawing labour force swung back into job-creation mode in February, with a net 50,700 people finding work. Most of those new hires were aged 55 or older — continuing a trend from January.

There’s a kerfuffle about revolving door regulation in the US:

“There’s a basic resistance to seeing things from the investor point of view,” said Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America. “It all goes back to the same thing — the degree to which the industry dominates this whole conversation.”

It’s a cultural problem as Roper sees it: Regulators and the regulated operate in a setting where people with the same pedigree move back and forth between government and private- sector jobs and outside views carry little weight. SEC spokesman Kevin Callahan said in an e-mail that investor protection is at the core of all the agency’s actions, and that until an investor advocate is appointed, existing SEC offices are performing the roles required by Dodd-Frank.

A study released last month by the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit watchdog group, stirred up a discussion about the revolving door of lawyers who alternate between government and industry, where they defend banks and brokers. Sorting through documents filed by 419 SEC alumni who had recently left the agency, the Project found 2,000 cases in which alumni planned to represent a client or an employer before the SEC between 2001 and 2010.

That’s a lot of meetings among lawyers who used to work down the hall from one another, but who now — officially, anyway — are adversaries. In the view of SEC critics, it is part of the clubby state of affairs that pushes government watchdogs and banks to see things the same way. Callahan said that the U.S. Government Accountability Office studied the revolving-door issue and concluded that the SEC’s controls were as strong as those of other government agencies. What a relief.

The problem is not so much that these guys know each other; I suspect that this helps as much as it hurts in terms of lawyers having a known reputation and encourages a little more frankness than might otherwise be the case. The problem is that the regulatory guys are representing their current employer against their future employer.

Instead of addressing the issues, the SEC is busily enforcing Brazilian laws:

A published report says the Brazilian operations of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. are under investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over allegations that it used bribes to get approval for construction deals.

The Wall Street Journal report said the SEC is expected to interview former Brookfield executive Daniela Gonzalez, who worked in its Sao Paulo unit, over allegations she made.

The Great White Fathers at the SEC evidently believe that Brazilian savages can’t enforce their own laws.

Fitch downgraded Italy:

Fitch Ratings-London-08 March 2013: Fitch Ratings has downgraded Italy’s Long-term foreign and local currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) to ‘BBB+’ from ‘A-‘. The Outlook on the Long-term IDRs is Negative. Fitch has simultaneously affirmed the Short-term foreign currency IDR at ‘F2’ and the common eurozone Country Ceiling for Italy at ‘AAA’.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The downgrade of Italy’s sovereign ratings reflects the following key rating factors:

– The inconclusive results of the Italian parliamentary elections on 24-25 February make it unlikely that a stable new government can be formed in the next few weeks. The increased political uncertainty and non-conducive backdrop for further structural reform measures constitute a further adverse shock to the real economy amidst the deep recession.
– Q412 data confirms that the ongoing recession in Italy is one of the deepest in Europe. The unfavourable starting position and some recent developments, like the unexpected fall in employment and persistently weak sentiment indicators, increase the risk of a more protracted and deeper recession than previously expected. Fitch expects a GDP contraction of 1.8% in 2013, due largely to the carry-over from the 2.4% contraction in 2012.
– Due to the deeper recession and its adverse impact on headline budget deficit, the gross general government debt (GGGD) will peak in 2013 at close to 130% of GDP compared with Fitch’s estimate of 125% in mid-2012, even assuming an unchanged underlying fiscal stance.
– A weak government could be slower and less able to respond to domestic or external economic shocks.

Spend-Every-Penny continued his centrally planned micromanaging approach to banking:

Canada’s Finance Minister has taken his battle against a housing bubble an extraordinary step further, issuing rare praise for the country’s banks for not matching Bank of Montreal’s cut-rate mortgage.

Jim Flaherty said Friday he also spoke with BMO this week after it cut its five-year, fixed-rate mortgage last weekend to 2.99 per cent, expressing how troubled he was by the cut from 3.09 per cent.

“I spoke with them about that this week and expressed my concern … in two ways,” Mr. Flaherty told reporters in Ottawa.

There is not any mention in the article of the FedGov’s policy of pouring gasoline onto the housing market fire by increasing the amount of federal mortgage insurance available through the CMHC.

Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund returned 13.4% last year. The fund has recently formalized its rebalancing policy and has returned +2.57% p.a. real return since 1998; note, however that this does not appear to be as good as the OTPP returns. If a pension plan wants good returns, it needs a captive asset manager.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums off 3bp, FixedResets down 12bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 2bp. Volatility was nil. Volume was on the high side of average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.3289 % 2,626.0
FixedFloater 4.09 % 3.43 % 30,117 18.42 1 0.0000 % 3,971.7
Floater 2.53 % 2.86 % 89,704 20.01 5 0.3289 % 2,835.3
OpRet 4.80 % 2.49 % 50,592 0.31 5 -0.0464 % 2,595.3
SplitShare 4.29 % 4.50 % 118,979 4.23 4 0.3441 % 2,930.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0464 % 2,373.2
Perpetual-Premium 5.21 % 1.57 % 86,531 0.15 31 -0.0268 % 2,356.7
Perpetual-Discount 4.82 % 4.85 % 139,254 15.65 4 -0.1111 % 2,657.6
FixedReset 4.89 % 2.72 % 292,536 3.33 80 -0.1175 % 2,508.5
Deemed-Retractible 4.86 % 1.73 % 140,574 0.22 44 0.0247 % 2,446.8
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
No issues gained or lost more than 1% today
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
BAM.PR.T FixedReset 96,900 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 26.40; Desjardins crossed 38,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.39
Bid-YTW : 3.26 %
TRP.PR.D FixedReset 88,320 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-08
Maturity Price : 23.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.46
Bid-YTW : 3.57 %
GCS.PR.A SplitShare 61,500 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2019-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.85
Bid-YTW : 4.10 %
RY.PR.T FixedReset 53,359 TD crossed 50,000 at 26.60.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.58
Bid-YTW : 2.03 %
RY.PR.H Deemed-Retractible 52,630 TD crossed 49,600 at 26.45.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-05-24
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.40
Bid-YTW : -1.00 %
ABK.PR.C SplitShare 39,900 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-10
Maturity Price : 31.64
Evaluated at bid price : 31.89
Bid-YTW : 3.18 %
There were 35 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
MFC.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 26.31 – 26.63
Spot Rate : 0.3200
Average : 0.1842

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-12-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.31
Bid-YTW : 2.90 %

HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.91 – 26.31
Spot Rate : 0.4000
Average : 0.2862

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-07
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.91
Bid-YTW : -3.60 %

BAM.PF.A FixedReset Quote: 26.26 – 26.52
Spot Rate : 0.2600
Average : 0.1572

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.26
Bid-YTW : 3.68 %

GWO.PR.I Deemed-Retractible Quote: 24.50 – 24.85
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2507

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 4.76 %

PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.56 – 25.83
Spot Rate : 0.2700
Average : 0.1979

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.56
Bid-YTW : 4.62 %

RY.PR.I FixedReset Quote: 25.51 – 25.73
Spot Rate : 0.2200
Average : 0.1551

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.51
Bid-YTW : 3.05 %

ABK.PR.C Achieves Good Premium on Decent Volume

Saturday, March 9th, 2013

Scotia Managed Companies has announced:

allBanc Split Corp. (the “Company”) (TSX:ABK.A)(TSX:ABK.PR.C) is pleased to announce that is has completed its public offering of Class C preferred shares, series 1 (“Preferred Shares”) and Class A capital shares (“Capital Shares”), raising $60,713,709 through the issuance of 1,177,652 Preferred Shares and 560,000 Capital Shares at a price per share of $31.64 and $41.88, respectively. In addition, the Company has redeemed all of its outstanding Class B preferred shares. The Preferred Shares and Capital Shares were offered to the public on a best efforts basis by a syndicate of agents led by Scotiabank which included CIBC, RBC Capital Markets, TD Securities Inc., BMO Capital Markets, National Bank Financial Inc., Canaccord Genuity Corp., Macquarie Private Wealth Inc., Raymond James Ltd., GMP Securities L.P., Mackie Research Capital Corporation, Burgeonvest Bick Securities Limited, Desjardins Securities Inc. and Manulife Securities Incorporated.

allBanc Split Corp. is a mutual fund corporation created to hold a portfolio of common shares of the Bank of Montreal, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada and The Toronto Dominion Bank.

The Capital Shares and Preferred Shares of allBanc Split Corp. are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols ABK.A and ABK.PR.C, respectively.

ABK.PR.C is a SplitShare paying 4.00% Eligible Dividends, maturing March 9, 2018. As reported earlier, proceeds are being used to refund ABK.PR.B, which matured today. This issue will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and assigned to the SplitShares subindex. Par value is, rather oddly, $31.64. The company’s website is at http://www.scotiamanagedcompanies.com/smc/profile.do?company=ABK.

DBRS rates the issue Pfd-2(low):

The Pfd-2 (low) rating of the Class C Preferred Shares is primarily based on the downside protection available to holders of the Class C Preferred Shares (55.0%), the Class C Preferred Share distribution coverage ratio (2.0 times) and the credit quality of the underlying companies in the Company’s portfolio.

The issue traded 39,900 shares today in a range of 31.51-32.50 (rather a wide range!) before closing at 31.89-99, 10×10. Vital statistics are:

ABK.PR.C SplitShare YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-10
Maturity Price : 31.64
Evaluated at bid price : 31.89
Bid-YTW : 3.18 %

March 7, 2013

Friday, March 8th, 2013

I have a little difficulty with the definition of “skilled workers” in the following but it’s nice to see people who can actually do things in demand:

After spending years searching for enough crude to pump, the U.S. oil and natural gas industry now is struggling to find and pay for enough skilled workers to tap the abundant supply in shale rock, putting $100 billion in planned petrochemical projects at risk.

Engineers and similar professionals earned an average $183,000 to $285,000 in 2012 depending on their position and background, a 20 percent to 50 percent jump since 2009, NES Global Talent data show. Wages in energy and mining have grown at nine times the rate of all industries since 2008, and starting salaries for petroleum engineering graduates are about $98,000, up 9.7 percent since 2008, according to PayScale Inc.

Chevron Phillips expects to employ 10,000 engineers and construction workers to build an ethylene plant and two plastics factories outside Houston at a cost of $5 billion. Chevron is racing competitors such as Dow, Exxon Mobil Corp. and a half dozen other companies that have announced plans to build plants for converting gas into ethylene, the most used petrochemical, on the Gulf Coast.

To me, “skilled workers” means tradesmen – electricians, plumbers, mechanics – not engineers, who I think of as “professionals”. But no matter.

John Paulson, whose successful bet against sub-prime made him a fortune and attracted a lot of assets, is the poster-boy for performance chasing:

John Paulson posted an 18 percent decline in his Gold Fund last month as a slump in the metal, after more than a decade of gains, undermined efforts by the billionaire hedge-fund manager to rebound from two years of losses in some strategies.

Paulson is being hurt as gold fell for the fifth straight month, its longest slump in 16 years. The manager told clients in 2012 his Gold Fund would beat his other strategies over five years because the metal was the best hedge against inflation and currency debasement as countries pump money into their economies. Falling gold stocks helped fuel losses last year in the manager’s $4.9 billion event-driven Advantage funds and the Gold Fund, and he also made wrong-way bets that Europe’s debt crisis would worsen.

The latest New Big Thing in junk bonds is Covenant Arbitrage, which is the cool way to say “reading the prospectus”:

The hundreds of pages of tedious documents that govern every corporate bond sold are suddenly a hot commodity as traders look for an edge with the biggest bull market ever in junk debt slowing.

Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK)’s $1.3 billion of 6.775 percent notes climbed to a record 104.5 cents on the dollar in a wager that the natural gas producer has run out of time to repurchase the debt at par, or 100 cents, as allowed by the debt’s covenants. Plano, Texas-based J.C. Penney Co. (JCP)’s 7.125 percent notes due 2023 have risen 9 percent this month, even as the rest of its debt plummets, in a bet the retailer will be forced to repay the issue early because of a covenant breach.

Investors began pushing up the price of Chesapeake’s 2019 notes last month to take advantage of “sloppy” language in the deal documents, according to Covenant Review’s [founder Adam] Cohen. Those securities rose above par even though the bond covenant has a redemption provision based on a March 15 date. The debt has since declined to 103.5 cents.

Some traders believe that the company is wrong that it can redeem the notes at par and that Chesapeake would have to pay a substantial premium if it wanted to repurchase them, Cohen said. If a so-called make-whole call provision were triggered, the company would have to pay bondholders as much $400 million in addition to the principal amount of the notes.

“The value of litigating the position may be high enough to make a little legal spending on a narrow issue worthwhile,”
Cohen wrote in a March 1 report. “Hiring a law firm to challenge the narrow issue of a par call would be relatively inexpensive.”

Jim Gipson, a spokesman for Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake, said he couldn’t immediately comment.

I quite agree with the conclusion of this article comparing US and Canadian mutual fund fees:

Over the longer term, fund investors should be asking regulators to allow the sale of U.S.-domiciled funds in Canada. While a common regulatory regime similar to the UCITS system in Europe (which allows funds to be sold throughout the European Union) may not be possible between Canada and the United States, fund regulation between the two countries is not so different as to prohibit the creation of a passport system.

Such a move would give Canadian fund investors more choice and more access to economies of scale, which could only translate into further reductions in the cost disparity between the two countries.

However, we have a mercantilist regulatory environment in Canada: US funds are disallowed in a tit-for-tat move taken in reaction to the SEC’s ban on US investment in Canadian funds. “You’re screwing your consumers, eh?” shout our red-faced regulators while practicing for their next job interviews. “Ha! We’ll just screw our consumers MORE! That’ll show you!”

What is it about university administration that attracts the brain-dead?

Scholarship programs funded by some of the nation’s biggest donors, including Gates, Coca-Cola Co. and Michael Dell, are taking aim at practices used by wealthy colleges, such as Boston College, which has a $1.65 billion endowment, Amherst, with a $1.64 billion fund and Barnard, with $216.4 million. They say the schools hurt poor and minority students by rescinding aid once they find out they have awards from outside sources or by banning use of the funds to cover some student contributions.

Letting students like Brindis use outside grants to cover the contribution “would be unfair to all the other ones who didn’t win the Gates,” [Boston College director of student financial strategies Bernie] Pekala said.

Similarly at Amherst College, a wealthy liberal arts school in Massachusetts, students can’t use outside scholarships to pay their “summer contribution,” which can run as high as $1,600, said Tom Parker, dean of admission and financial aid.

“Here’s the conundrum. You want to treat everybody as equally as you can,” Parker said. “Morally it’s a difficult question.”

Um … isn’t the whole point of scholarships to discriminate on the basis of ability?

It was a day of highly segmented gains for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums up 3bp, FixedResets winning 27bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 1bp. This may be due to the market absorbing the TRP.PR.D monster issue, or it may not. Volatility was high and dominated by – you guessed it – winning FixedResets. Volume was very high.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.3787 % 2,617.3
FixedFloater 4.09 % 3.43 % 29,237 18.42 1 -0.2151 % 3,971.7
Floater 2.54 % 2.86 % 90,567 20.00 5 0.3787 % 2,826.0
OpRet 4.80 % 2.49 % 51,048 0.31 5 0.0077 % 2,596.5
SplitShare 4.41 % 4.54 % 117,993 5.13 3 -0.4592 % 2,920.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0077 % 2,374.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.20 % 0.98 % 86,686 0.15 31 0.0331 % 2,357.3
Perpetual-Discount 4.81 % 4.85 % 137,883 15.66 4 0.1720 % 2,660.6
FixedReset 4.89 % 2.59 % 292,915 3.50 80 0.2732 % 2,511.4
Deemed-Retractible 4.86 % 2.52 % 138,273 0.21 44 0.0132 % 2,446.2
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
MFC.PR.J FixedReset 1.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.15
Bid-YTW : 2.99 %
HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-06
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 26.05
Bid-YTW : -10.11 %
BMO.PR.Q FixedReset 1.02 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.76
Bid-YTW : 2.62 %
BAM.PR.Z FixedReset 1.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.20
Bid-YTW : 3.04 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 1.35 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.25
Bid-YTW : 2.00 %
MFC.PR.H FixedReset 1.47 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.94
Bid-YTW : 2.53 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 1.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-07
Maturity Price : 23.69
Evaluated at bid price : 25.93
Bid-YTW : 2.68 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TRP.PR.D FixedReset 192,507 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-07
Maturity Price : 23.24
Evaluated at bid price : 25.45
Bid-YTW : 3.49 %
FTS.PR.E OpRet 103,100 National crossed 60,000 at 26.35; Scotia crossed 40,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 26.27
Bid-YTW : -3.40 %
BNS.PR.X FixedReset 90,122 TD crossed 75,000 at 26.35.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.33
Bid-YTW : 2.02 %
ENB.PR.B FixedReset 88,556 Nesbitt crossed 75,800 at 26.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.97
Bid-YTW : 3.05 %
PWF.PR.S Perpetual-Discount 81,622 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-07
Maturity Price : 24.59
Evaluated at bid price : 24.98
Bid-YTW : 4.81 %
FTS.PR.C OpRet 76,295 Scotia crossed 75,000 at 25.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2013-08-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.16
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %
There were 62 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 23.87 – 24.29
Spot Rate : 0.4200
Average : 0.3528

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-07
Maturity Price : 23.60
Evaluated at bid price : 23.87
Bid-YTW : 2.18 %

TD.PR.P Deemed-Retractible Quote: 26.50 – 26.70
Spot Rate : 0.2000
Average : 0.1337

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-06
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.50
Bid-YTW : -12.09 %

CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.12 – 25.31
Spot Rate : 0.1900
Average : 0.1251

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-07
Maturity Price : 24.78
Evaluated at bid price : 25.12
Bid-YTW : 4.59 %

RY.PR.L FixedReset Quote: 25.72 – 25.90
Spot Rate : 0.1800
Average : 0.1234

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.72
Bid-YTW : 2.78 %

BMO.PR.L Deemed-Retractible Quote: 26.65 – 26.85
Spot Rate : 0.2000
Average : 0.1515

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-05-25
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.65
Bid-YTW : -5.11 %

CM.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 26.76 – 26.90
Spot Rate : 0.1400
Average : 0.0957

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.76
Bid-YTW : 1.88 %

GCS.PR.A Soft On Low Volume

Friday, March 8th, 2013

Global Champions Split Corp. has announced:

that it has completed its initial public offering of Class A Preferred Shares, Series 1 (the “Series 1 Shares”). The offering raised gross proceeds of $50.0 million, and was offered by a syndicate of agents led by National Bank Financial Inc., CIBC World Markets, RBC Capital Markets, Scotiabank and TD Securities Inc. and includes BMO Capital Markets, Canaccord Genuity Corp., GMP Securities L.P., Raymond James Ltd., Macquarie Private Wealth Inc. and Brookfield Financial Corp. (the “Agents”). A total of 2,000,000 Series 1 Shares were issued at a price of $25.00 per Series 1 Share. The Company also announced today that it has completed the issuance of 2,000,000 capital shares of the Company to BAM Investments Corp.

The Company has granted the Agents an over-allotment option to acquire up to an additional 300,000 Series 1 Shares at a price of $25.00 per Series 1 Share for a period of 30 days after closing of the offering which, if exercised in full, would increase the total gross proceeds of the offering to $57.5 million.

The Series 1 Shares have been rated Pfd-2 (low) by DBRS Limited. The Series 1 Shares will commence trading today on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “GCS.PR.A”.

The Company’s investment objectives with respect to the Series 1 Shares are (i) to provide holders of Series 1 Shares with fixed cumulative preferential quarterly cash distributions in the amount of $0.25 per Series 1 Share to yield 4.00% per annum on the original issue price of the Series 1 Shares and (ii) on or about July 31, 2019, to pay the holders of Series 1 Shares the original issue price of $25.00 of those shares, through the redemption of each Series 1 Share held on July 31, 2019. Such quarterly distributions are expected to be paid by the Company to holders of record on the last Business Day of March, June, September and December in each year with payments being made on or before the 15th day of the following month. The initial distribution will be prorated from today’s date until March 31, 2013 and is expected to be payable on or before April 15, 2013 to holders of record on March 28, 2013. The final prospectus is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Initially, the Portfolio will consist of 15 large capitalization companies and will be approximately equally weighted on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis.

GCS.PR.A is a SplitShare paying 4.00% (probably) eligible dividends, maturing July 31, 2019, initially reported on PrefBlog on February 15. This issue will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and assigned to the SplitShares subindex. The company’s website is http://globalchampions.com/.

The issue traded 28,150 shares today in a range of 24.76-95 before closing at 24.86-90, 12×40. Vital Statistics are:

GCS.PR.A SplitShare YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2019-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.86
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %

March 6, 2013

Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

The Bank of Canada statement held no surprises:

Canada’s economy grew by 0.6 per cent at annual rates in the fourth quarter of 2012, with solid growth across most domestic components of GDP offset by a sharp reduction in the pace of inventory investment. The Bank expects growth in Canada to pick up through 2013, supported by modest growth in household spending combined with a recovery in exports and solid business investment. With a more constructive evolution of imbalances in the household sector, residential investment is expected to decline further from historically high levels. The Bank expects trend growth in household credit to moderate further, with the debt-to-income ratio stabilizing near current levels. Despite the expected recovery in exports, they are likely to remain below their pre-recession peak until the second half of 2014 owing to restrained foreign demand and ongoing competitiveness challenges, including the persistent strength of the Canadian dollar.

Total CPI inflation has been somewhat more subdued than projected in the January MPR as a result of weaker core inflation and lower mortgage interest costs, which were only partially offset by higher gasoline prices. Low core inflation reflects muted price pressures across a wide range of goods and services, consistent with material excess capacity in the economy. Core and total CPI inflation are expected to remain low in the near term before rising gradually to reach 2 per cent over the projection horizon as the economy returns to full capacity and inflation expectations remain well-anchored.

Reflecting all of these factors, the Bank has decided to maintain the target for the overnight rate at 1 per cent. With continued slack in the Canadian economy, the muted outlook for inflation, and the more constructive evolution of imbalances in the household sector, the considerable monetary policy stimulus currently in place will likely remain appropriate for a period of time, after which some modest withdrawal will likely be required, consistent with achieving the 2 per cent inflation target.

The Financial Post points out:

In their statement, policymakers said that given the “continued slack in the Canadian economy, the muted outlook for inflation, and the more constructive evolution of imbalances in the household sector, the considerable monetary stimulus currently in place will likely remain appropriate for a period of time, after which some modest withdrawal will likely be required.”

That replaces the phrase “the timing of any such withdrawal is less imminent than previously anticipated,” which has accompanied recent rate announcements.

ETFs are a marvellous way for liquidity seeking investors to invest in illiquid markets. But friction works both ways:

Exchange traded funds have transformed the gold market. Since the first fund was launched nearly a decade ago, the products have become so successful in offering a simple way for investors to buy physical gold that they have acquired the nickname “the people’s central bank.”

But what happens when the people’s central bank decides to sell?

That is the question now haunting the bullion market. Since the start of January, gold ETFs have dumped 140 tonnes of gold. February saw the largest monthly outflow of gold from ETFs on record.

The sell-off is partly a reflection of broader negative sentiment towards gold, as investors become more confident in the global economy and put their money into riskier assets such as equities. Prices have slid 12 per cent since October to less than $1,580 (U.S.) an ounce, and are down 18 per cent from their record nominal high in 2011.

This taxonomy of sales traders made me laugh:

5.) Low Man –If I sneezed he’d say “bless you,” if I was tired and hung over he’d worry he’d done something wrong. He worked extremely hard, but the problem was he didn’t get a lot of respect from his own desk.

6.) The Man – He’d answer the phone “250k up – what do you want to do?” Management loved him—he was the busiest guy on Wall Street. All you had to do was ask him. He’d get business done and wears his firm’s crest on his sleeve. He worked for one of the white-shoe investment banks and had gone to one of the best schools. He wound up as an equity sales trader because he wasn’t smart enough to do something more difficult, but he always spun it that it was his choice to trade.

7.) Family Man – He’d been passed over for several promotions, and was often caught off the desk calling his wife to discuss the twins’ science project. He’d accepted the ceiling in his career; Family Man was honest, calm and genuinely cared about doing the right thing. He tended to whisper.

8.) Script Man – Every morning he’d call at the exact time using the exact voice from the day before. Early in his career he’d been confused about the business, so he decided to keep it simple. He never cracked a joke in his entire career

This characterization of entrepreneurs was interesting:

Some of the common characteristics that “turn out to be accurate predictors of entrepreneurial success” go back to when they were teenagers, said the release about the study, which looked at longitudinal data of more than 12,000 men and women.

Among them: the entrepreneurs had high IQs, came from stable families, had parents earning higher than average salaries, and they showed greater self-esteem, the release said.

But they also “exhibited aggressive behaviour and got in trouble as teenagers,” said one of the researchers, Ross Levine, a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley, in the release about the study, which he carried out with Yona Rubinstein of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

“This is the person who wasn’t afraid to break the rules, take things by force or even be involved in minor drugs.”

I mentioned BNS.PR.Y BNS.PR.P yesterday with reference to its imminent Exchange Date and the lack of guidance in the bank’s earnings release. The Financial Post has more:

John Nagel, head of the preferred share trading group at Desjardins Securities the firm that help design the rate reset pref, is also waiting anxiously, though he believes BNS should call the deal. “Half the people I have spoken to think they will call the issue; the other half think BNS will leave it out there because the rate [for the bank] is reasonable.”

If BNS doesn’t redeem, Nagel argues for investors there is better value in opting for the floating rate prefs, both from an initial absolute yield and the expectation that rates will rise over the next five years.

Nagel does have a point about floating rate: three month bills are averaging 0.96% while five-year Canadas are currently at 1.31% – it won’t take much of a nudge for the bills to average more than 1.31% over the next five years. Nagel has been previously quoted as favouring the Floating Rate option.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiumgs gaining 3bp, FixedResets off 5bp and DeemedRetractibles down 7bp. Volatility was minor. Volume was quite high.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 4.87%, equivalent to 6.33% interest at the standard conversion factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield about 4.25%, so the pre-tax interest equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 210bp, unchanged from February 27.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2035 % 2,607.5
FixedFloater 4.09 % 3.42 % 27,054 18.44 1 -0.8529 % 3,980.2
Floater 2.55 % 2.86 % 90,821 20.01 5 -0.2035 % 2,815.4
OpRet 4.80 % 2.48 % 47,285 0.31 5 -0.0155 % 2,596.3
SplitShare 4.59 % 4.59 % 53,191 4.24 2 0.2803 % 2,934.0
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0155 % 2,374.1
Perpetual-Premium 5.21 % 1.29 % 89,789 0.15 31 0.0275 % 2,356.5
Perpetual-Discount 4.82 % 4.87 % 136,618 15.63 4 0.1114 % 2,656.0
FixedReset 4.90 % 2.72 % 286,016 3.54 80 -0.0524 % 2,504.6
Deemed-Retractible 4.86 % 1.72 % 139,379 0.22 44 -0.0722 % 2,445.8
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
MFC.PR.F FixedReset -1.84 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.02
Bid-YTW : 3.20 %
PWF.PR.A Floater -1.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-06
Maturity Price : 23.48
Evaluated at bid price : 23.75
Bid-YTW : 2.19 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TRP.PR.D FixedReset 130,521 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-06
Maturity Price : 23.24
Evaluated at bid price : 25.45
Bid-YTW : 3.49 %
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater 102,140 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 23.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-06
Maturity Price : 23.43
Evaluated at bid price : 23.25
Bid-YTW : 3.42 %
RY.PR.T FixedReset 92,183 CIBC sold 50,000 to TD and 28,700 to Desjardins, both at 26.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.50
Bid-YTW : 2.24 %
CM.PR.L FixedReset 88,244 RBC bought blocks of 10,000 and 25,000 from TD and blocks of 10,000 and 12,700 from CIBC, all at 26.49.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.49
Bid-YTW : 1.81 %
BAM.PR.K Floater 78,025 Scotia crossed blocks of 48,200 and 25,000, both at 18.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-06
Maturity Price : 18.39
Evaluated at bid price : 18.39
Bid-YTW : 2.88 %
BNS.PR.T FixedReset 71,540 RBC bought 33,700 from CIBC at 26.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.30
Bid-YTW : 2.12 %
There were 53 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
MFC.PR.H FixedReset Quote: 26.55 – 27.00
Spot Rate : 0.4500
Average : 0.2730

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.55
Bid-YTW : 2.93 %

MFC.PR.F FixedReset Quote: 25.02 – 25.38
Spot Rate : 0.3600
Average : 0.2170

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.02
Bid-YTW : 3.20 %

HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.79 – 26.07
Spot Rate : 0.2800
Average : 0.1738

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-05
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.79
Bid-YTW : 1.72 %

W.PR.J Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.59 – 25.94
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2549

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-05
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.59
Bid-YTW : -13.11 %

NA.PR.N FixedReset Quote: 25.21 – 25.50
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.2002

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.21
Bid-YTW : 3.29 %

RY.PR.I FixedReset Quote: 25.51 – 25.74
Spot Rate : 0.2300
Average : 0.1430

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.51
Bid-YTW : 3.03 %

LFE.WT.A Exercise Date Changed

Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

In June 2012, it was announced that each share of LFE.PR.A had been exchanged for

  • One share of LFE.PR.B
  • One LFE.WT.A (exercise price $12.00 for a unit, expiry 2013-6-3)
  • One LFE.WT.B (exercise price $12.60 for a unit, expiry 2014-6-2

Now, Quadravest Capital Management Inc. has announced:

Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. (the “Company”) today announced that it has exercised the call option on its 2013 Warrants (Symbol: LFE.WT.A) (the “Warrants”). The call option permits the Company to elect an earlier expiry date for the Warrants than June 3, 2013.

The expiry date of the Warrants will now be March 27, 2013 (the “New Expiry Date”). The exercise price for the 2013 Warrants is $12.00. Warrants that are not exercised prior to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on the New Expiry Date will be void and of no value.

Warrantholders that wish to exercise Warrants must provide the CDS Participant holding their Warrants with instructions and the required payment sufficiently in advance of the New Expiry Date to permit the proper exercise of their Warrants. CDS Participants will have an earlier deadline for receipt of instructions and payment.

Additional information regarding the 2013 Warrants is contained in the Management Information Circular dated March 14, 2012 prepared in respect of the June 2012 Preferred Share Capital Reorganization, or in the Company’s annual information form dated February 20, 2013 each available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on the Company’s website www.lifesplit.com.

For further information, please contact Investor Relations at 416-304-4443, toll free at 1-877-4-Quadra
(1-877-478-2372), or visit www.lifesplit.com.

The “Call Option” on the warrants was described in the Management Information Circular:

The Company will have the right, but not the obligation, to call the Warrants at any time (the “Call Option”). The Company must issue a press release when it decides to exercise the Call Option and deliver a notice within five business days to all Warrantholders if it decides to exercise the Call Option.

The 2013 Warrant Expiry Date will be June 3, 2013, unless the 2013 Warrants are called by the Company, in which case the 2013 Warrant Expiry Date will be 20 business days from the date the Call Option is exercised by the Company. 2013 Warrants not exercised prior to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on the 2013 Warrant Expiry Date will be void and of no value.

The 2014 Warrant Expiry Date will be June 2, 2014, unless the 2014 Warrants are called by the Company, in which case the 2014 Warrant Expiry Date will be 20 business days from the date the Call Option is exercised by the Company. 2014 Warrants not exercised prior to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on the 2014 Warrant Expiry Date will be void and of no value.

The NAV as of February 28, 2013 has been reported as:

Canadian Life Companies Split $13.71 (Diluted: $13.03*)
(LFE & LFE.PR.B)

*Does not account for estimated warrant subscription fee of $0.13 per unit.

I don’t understand this calculation, frankly, which echoes my previous bafflement at the dilution calculation. The Management Information Circular – posted on SEDAR, dated March 21, 2012) states:

If at any time while any 2013 Warrants are outstanding the net asset value per Unit is in excess of the 2013 Warrant Subscription Price, or while any 2014 Warrants are outstanding the net asset value per Unit is in excess of the 2014 Warrant Subscription Price, a diluted net asset value per Unit will be calculated in addition to the basic net asset value per Unit, and any payment of retraction proceeds will be based on the diluted net asset value per Unit. The diluted net asset value per Unit of the Company at any such time shall be calculated by dividing (a) the net asset value at that time plus the product of the number of 2013 Warrants then outstanding and the 2013 Warrant Subscription Price plus (if the net asset value per Unit exceeds the 2014 Warrant Subscription Price) the product of the number of 2014 Warrant then outstanding and the 2014 Warrant Subscription Price, by (b) the number of Units then outstanding plus the number of Units to be issued on the exercise of all 2013 Warrants then outstanding plus (if the net asset value per Unit exceeds the 2014 Warrant Subscription Price), the number of Units to be issued on the exercise of all 2014 Warrants then outstanding. The diluted net asset value per Unit shall be deemed to be the resulting quotient. If the Company were to issue additional warrants in the future, it would similarly calculate a diluted net asset value at any time when such warrants were “in the money”.

A further complication is:

Subscription Fee
The Company will pay a subscription fee of $0.25 per Unit in respect of each subscription procured by a CDS Participant on behalf of their clients.

My previous bafflement was explained by the fact that the Subscription Fee was accounted for in the published calculation, although it was not mentioned in the Information Circular’s calculation methodology.

I suspect that my current bafflement is affected by the Normal Course Issuer Bid:

As of January 2, 2012, there are 7,930,113 Preferred Shares and 7,930,113 Class A Shares issued and outstanding.

… while TMX Money reports:

Shares Out.: 8,181,613

… which is a change in the wrong direction, unless there have been warrant exercises in the interim, which is permitted by the Information Circular:

each 2013 Warrant can be exercised to purchase one 2012 Preferred Share and one Class A Share (together a “Unit”) for an exercise price of the lesser of $13.25 and 103% of the net asset value of the Company on the Conversion Date (the “2013 Warrant Subscription Price”) on any business day during the period commencing at market open

I have sent an inquiry to the company and will update this post if and when I receive an answer.

At any rate, let us assume that they have done their calculations properly (I’m sure they have; I just don’t understand it) and the adjusted diluted NAV is $13.03 less warrant exercise fees of $0.13 = $12.90 as of February 28.

Now let’s see if the NAV has changed since last month-end:

Estimate of LFE Unit NAV
As of 2013-3-6
Holding Price
2/28
Price
3/6
Change
MFC 15.30 15.39 +0.58%
SLF 28.81 28.64 -0.59%
GWO 27.40 27.55 +0.55%
IAG 37.00 36.90 -0.27%
Portfolio
(Assuming equal weighting)
+0.07%

Thus we may assume that the NAVPU of LFE is currently virtually equal to the month-end value, maybe a penny more. But nothing dramatic. About $12.90, fully diluted and adjusted for subscription fees.

Since the exercise price of LFE.PR.A is $12.00, this implies that the intrinsic value of the warrants is about $0.90. But LFE.WT.A closed today at $0.37. And they’ve been trading in good size for the past few weeks, too. The problem is that the Units are trading at a substantial discount to intrinsic value: LFE closed today at $2.31, while LFE.PR.B closed at $10.08, total is $12.39, approximately equal to the warrant price plus the subscription price.

What’s going on? Why is LFE trading so far below intrinsic value?

Update, 2013-3-8: The manager doesn’t know how the diluted NAV is calculated either:

Good morning,

The Company’s NAV is calculated by RBC Dexia. In the past 30 days there have been capital changes, making it difficult to calculate the NAV without having all of the relevant information. For example, there were significant warrant exercises along with corporate buybacks that impacted the NAV.

Kind regards.

Quadravest Investor Relations

March 5, 2013

Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

The Europeans are backing away from austerity:

European finance ministers opened the way for looser budget policies after a backlash against austerity thrust Italy into political limbo and shattered months of relative stability in European markets.

Italy’s deadlocked election, France’s refusal to make deeper budget cuts and protests against the shrinking of the welfare state across southern Europe escalated the rebellion against the German-led prescription for fighting the debt crisis.

Economic strains “may also justify in a certain number of cases reviewing deadlines for the correction of excessive deficits,” European Union Economic and Monetary Commissioner Olli Rehn told reporters late yesterday after a meeting of euro-area finance ministers in Brussels.

Meanwhile, there is chatter that loose money is required in Canada:

Hedge funds are amassing record bets against the Canadian dollar on speculation the Bank of Canada will drop its bias toward raising interest rates, putting it in unison with the rest of the Group of Seven nations.

Futures contracts wagering on a decline in the Canadian dollar versus its U.S. counterpart held by so-called leveraged funds totaled C$6.3 billion ($6.1 billion) in the week ended Feb. 26, according to Citigroup Inc., citing U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission figures. Overall, the data showed traders reversed bets on a rise in the Canadian currency during the five-day period for the first time in eight months.

Weak exports and record debts are eroding growth in the world’s 11th-largest economy, with the slowest expansion forecast this year since 2009. Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney remains the lone central-bank head in the G-7 suggesting a rate increase. BlackRock Inc. and State Street Canada are among the fixed-income managers speculating that Carney may drop his tightening bias when the central bank meets tomorrow, making Canadian-dollar denominated assets less attractive to international investors.

Loose money is government policy – why, look at the 12Q1 Scotia Investor Presentation! 58% of their $188-billion mortgage portfolio is government insured. Thank you, Federal Junior Republicans!

One of the words that can generally be relied upon to turn brains into much is “privacy” (another is “kiddie-porn”). It was nice to see the word being used to eliminate a little stupid red tape:

Ontario’s privacy commissioner has ordered the LCBO to stop collecting personal information from people who buy alcohol through wine clubs.

Ann Cavoukian’s decision came after a wine club complained that the Liquor Control Board of Ontario required it to provide the names, addresses, phone numbers and selections of everyone taking part in bulk orders.

“The LCBO has not provided my office with much more than anecdotal or hypothetical evidence to support its position that the illegal resale of liquor by wine clubs in this province is so problematic that it necessitates the collection of the personal information of club members who purchase wine through their clubs,” she wrote last week.

Scotia’s 12Q1 Quarterly Press Release did not contain a statement of intent to redeem BNS.PR.P, a FixedReset, 5.00%+205 that will reset 2013-4-30 at a yield currently forecast to be 3.25% if not called. Make of that what you will.

It was a very uneven day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums gaining 1bp, FixedResets winning 29bp and DeemedRetractibles up 10bp. Lots of volatility, comprised almost entirely of FixedReset winners. Volume was extremely high, helped along by the CU 4.50% Straight new issue and the CPX 4.50%+315 FixedReset new issue – and, doubtless, continued shuffling after the closing of TRP.PR.D yesterday.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.7026 % 2,612.8
FixedFloater 4.05 % 3.39 % 25,032 18.51 1 -0.3823 % 4,014.5
Floater 2.54 % 2.87 % 84,031 20.00 5 0.7026 % 2,821.1
OpRet 4.80 % 2.55 % 47,843 0.31 5 0.1548 % 2,596.7
SplitShare 4.60 % 4.63 % 49,256 4.24 2 -0.0800 % 2,925.8
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1548 % 2,374.5
Perpetual-Premium 5.21 % 1.56 % 90,412 0.16 31 0.0094 % 2,355.9
Perpetual-Discount 4.83 % 4.87 % 133,609 15.60 4 0.0203 % 2,653.0
FixedReset 4.90 % 2.74 % 285,413 3.31 80 0.2892 % 2,505.9
Deemed-Retractible 4.86 % 1.63 % 141,305 0.22 44 0.1049 % 2,447.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.C Floater -1.24 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-05
Maturity Price : 18.26
Evaluated at bid price : 18.26
Bid-YTW : 2.90 %
HSE.PR.A FixedReset 1.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-03-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.76
Bid-YTW : 1.98 %
ENB.PR.D FixedReset 1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-03-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.96
Bid-YTW : 3.18 %
VNR.PR.A FixedReset 1.02 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-10-15
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.76
Bid-YTW : 2.87 %
PWF.PR.A Floater 1.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-05
Maturity Price : 23.70
Evaluated at bid price : 24.01
Bid-YTW : 2.16 %
BMO.PR.P FixedReset 1.09 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.94
Bid-YTW : 1.48 %
BNS.PR.Z FixedReset 1.24 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.36
Bid-YTW : 2.81 %
IFC.PR.C FixedReset 1.53 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.17
Bid-YTW : 1.90 %
IFC.PR.A FixedReset 1.69 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.01
Bid-YTW : 2.59 %
SLF.PR.I FixedReset 1.77 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.42
Bid-YTW : 2.61 %
TRI.PR.B Floater 3.09 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-05
Maturity Price : 23.74
Evaluated at bid price : 24.05
Bid-YTW : 2.17 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
CU.PR.D Perpetual-Premium 404,200 TD crossed blocks of 309,900 and 74,600, both at 26.25. Nice tickets!
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2021-09-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.25
Bid-YTW : 4.23 %
TRP.PR.D FixedReset 216,520 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-05
Maturity Price : 23.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.46
Bid-YTW : 3.48 %
PWF.PR.S Perpetual-Discount 66,958 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-05
Maturity Price : 24.58
Evaluated at bid price : 24.97
Bid-YTW : 4.81 %
BAM.PR.K Floater 62,496 Scotia crossed 44,800 at 18.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-05
Maturity Price : 18.40
Evaluated at bid price : 18.40
Bid-YTW : 2.88 %
BNS.PR.P FixedReset 59,599 Scotia crossed 28,000 at 25.15.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.18
Bid-YTW : 2.98 %
ENB.PR.T FixedReset 48,932 National crossed 19,500 at 25.67.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-05
Maturity Price : 23.30
Evaluated at bid price : 25.66
Bid-YTW : 3.53 %
There were 62 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
SLF.PR.F FixedReset Quote: 26.20 – 26.50
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.1963

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : 1.97 %

BMO.PR.K Deemed-Retractible Quote: 26.30 – 26.65
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2669

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-04
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.30
Bid-YTW : -7.45 %

BAM.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 26.85 – 27.15
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2178

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.85
Bid-YTW : 3.34 %

TRP.PR.B FixedReset Quote: 24.45 – 24.65
Spot Rate : 0.2000
Average : 0.1265

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-03-05
Maturity Price : 23.29
Evaluated at bid price : 24.45
Bid-YTW : 2.58 %

RY.PR.R FixedReset Quote: 25.90 – 26.07
Spot Rate : 0.1700
Average : 0.0999

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.90
Bid-YTW : 2.68 %

TD.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 25.74 – 26.04
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2343

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.74
Bid-YTW : 2.86 %

BAM Trend Negative, Says DBRS

Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

DBRS has announced that it:

has today confirmed all ratings of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM or the Company) but changed the trends to Negative from Stable. The ratings are BAM’s Issuer Rating at A (low), Commercial Paper rating at R-1 (low), Senior Notes and Debentures Rating at A (low) and Preferred Shares and Preferred Securities ratings, both at Pfd-2 (low). The trend change to Negative follows the downgrade of the Issuer Rating of BAM’s subsidiary, Brookfield Office Properties Inc. (BOP), to BBB from BBB (high), reflecting that BAM’s ratings are under pressure because of BOP’s weaker credit quality, as well as the sustained high debt level at BAM’s corporate level.

DBRS recognizes that BAM’s corporate-level cash flow metrics have improved in 2012 and are close to our previously stated expectations. For the full-year 2012, the Company’s FFO-to-debt was 28% (compared with 23% in 2011 and DBRS’s expectation of 30%) and FFO interest coverage was 4.9x (compared with 4.5x in 2011 and DBRS’s expectation of 5.0x). The shortfalls from our previously stated expectations also reflect the impact of continued difficult hydrology to operating cash flow in its renewable power segment and some delays in its asset disposal plan.

However, DBRS notes that, as was the case with BOP, the quality of BAM’s portfolio of operating assets has been affected in recent years by its respective debt-financed expansions at operating company levels (particularly in the retail property, renewable power and infrastructure segments). Although such expansions are generally earnings accretive, the increased leverage, weakened coverage metrics and, in some cases, higher business and project risks, have constrained the quality of cash flow from these companies, most of which are assessed to be compatible to rating levels of BBB or weaker.

DBRS believes that, to sustain its ratings at the A (low) level, BAM will need to improve the overall credit quality of its investments over time through increasing the proportion of investments with strong BBB or better credit quality and more conservative use of leverage at the operating-company level. With weaker quality of cash flow from BOP and increasing leverage (and therefore debt servicing requirements) in its key subsidiaries in recent years, DBRS now believes the cash flow metrics at BAM’s corporate level will need to be raised in order to maintain the necessary cushion for its ratings. Specifically, DBRS expects BAM to further improve its corporate-level FFO-to-debt toward 35% and FFO interest coverage toward 5.5x, and to maintain at these levels on a sustained basis. DBRS will review the progress during the course of 2013.

DBRS could consider a one-notch downgrade of BAM’s ratings if it becomes evident that the Company will be unable to meet any of the above expectations and to remedy the shortfall within an acceptable timeframe.

Previously reported on PrefBlog have been the downgrade of BPO and DBRS’ nervousness about BAM.

A downgrade of BAM would also have an immediate effect on the SplitShares issued by BAM Split Corp.: BNA.PR.B, BNA.PR.C, BNA.PR.D and BNA.PR.E.

It also seems likely that a BAM downgrade would involve collateral or related damage to the ratings of Brookfield Properties Corp (BPO.PR.F, BPO.PR.H, BPO.PR.J, BPO.PR.K, BPO.PR.L, BPO.PR.N, BPO.PR.P, BPO.PR.R, BPO.PR.T), Brookfield Office Properties (BPP.PR.G, BPP.PR.J, BPP.PR.M), Brookfield Renewable Power Preferred Equity Inc (BRF.PR.A, BRF.PR.C, BRF.PR.E) and Brookfield Investments Corporation (BRN.PR.A).

Brookfield Asset Management is the proud issuer of:

FixedResets BAM.PF.A, BAM.PF.B, BAM.PR.P, BAM.PR.R, BAM.PR.T, BAM.PR.X, BAM.PR.Z
Floaters BAM.PR.B, BAM.PR.C, BAM.PR.K
RatchetRate BAM.PR.E
FixedFloater BAM.PR.G
OperatingRetractible BAM.PR.J, BAM.PR.O
Straight Perpetual BAM.PR.M, BAM.PR.N, BAM.PF.C

BPO Downgraded to Pfd-3 [Stable] by DBRS

Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

DBRS has announced that it:

has today downgraded the Issuer Rating and Senior Unsecured Debt of Brookfield Office Properties Inc. (Brookfield or the Company) to BBB from BBB (high), and the Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Class AAA to Pfd-3 from Pfd-3 (high).The trends on all ratings have been revised to Stable from Negative.

…Brookfield has released its F2012 year-end results, which included an update on the pending three million square foot (sq. ft.) vacancy at towers two and four of BPNY. Brookfield’s management indicated that it is nearing letters of intent on 1.5 million sq. ft. at BPNY, which accounts for approximately 50% of the remaining exposure to the Bank of America Merrill Lynch lease. While this leasing update is encouraging, DBRS expects operating income to remain relatively flat in 2013, and expects further pressure on operating income during the BPNY re-leasing transition period in 2014 and 2015.

Since DBRS does not expect Brookfield to take measures that would meaningfully reduce debt to offset softness in operating income, DBRS expects the EBITDA coverage ratio to remain below 2.00x during this time frame. As a result, DBRS believes Brookfield’s credit risk profile is no longer consistent with a BBB (high) rating.

DBRS notes that a prolonged weakness in operating performance (particularly due to further leasing delays at BPNY) and/or an increase in financial leverage that results in further deterioration of key credit metrics (i.e., EBITDA interest coverage below 1.70x) could result in a trend change to Negative. Although highly unlikely at this time, a change to Positive trend would require Brookfield to demonstrate meaningful improvement in operating income and significant deleveraging of its balance sheet.

DBRS’ prior “Trend Negative” outlook on BPO was reported on PrefBlog. It will be noted that BPO ratings have a knock-on effect on their parent, BAM.

Brookfield Office Properties is the proud issuer of:

OperatingRetractibles BPO.PR.H, BPO.PR.J, BPO.PR.K
FixedResets BPO.PR.L, BPO.PR.N, BPO.PR.P, BPO.PR.R and BPO.PR.T