Archive for December, 2014

December 8, 2014

Tuesday, December 9th, 2014

Assiduous Reader JP, who often sends me interesting snippets, unlike youse other bums, brings to my attention a small preferred share issue from China:

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China will issue US$5.7 billion worth of preferred shares in three currencies in what will be the largest offshore issuance of hybrid securities from a mainland firm.

ICBC proposed issuing US$2.94 billion in dollar-denominated shares, €600 million (HK$5.73 billion) and 12 billion yuan (HK$15.13 billion) all priced at 6 per cent, according to a regulatory filing.

The shares will count as additional tier-1 capital, boosting the bank’s capital adequacy ratio as defined by Basel III, an international accord aimed at raising the viability of banks and avoiding public bailouts.

The record deal also marked the first time a mainland bank issued offshore preferred shares denominated in three currencies.

ICBC International was the sole global coordinator and UBS, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs were joint book-runners on the deal.

It’s nice to see some real progress on solar power efficiency:

UNSW’s solar researchers have converted over 40% of the sunlight hitting a solar system into electricity, the highest efficiency ever reported.

The world-beating efficiency was achieved in outdoor tests in Sydney, before being independently confirmed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at their outdoor test facility in the United States.

The work was funded by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) and supported by the Australia–US Institute for Advanced Photovoltaics (AUSIAPV).

“This is the highest efficiency ever reported for sunlight conversion into electricity,” UNSW Scientia Professor and Director of the Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics (ACAP) Professor Martin Green said.

The price wasn’t mentioned, but the basic idea comes first, right? Then give it to the engineers to make it cheap. Too bad this research wasn’t done in Ontari-ari-ari-owe, but we blew our solar budget on political grandstanding.

After posting the MAPF November statements, I posted the following on the Canada Post Facebook Page:

I just sent a batch of letters with Madonna & Child stamps when a thought struck me and caused me to check your website.

I see your “Holiday 2014” collection is dominated by Santa Claus – rather childish in my view, but the important thing is that they are stamps and you stick them on letters and they get delivered.

But why are there no stamps with an Islamic theme? No Jewish stamps? No stamps for Kwanzai, Bohdi Day, Pancha Ganapati or Yule? It would make things more interesting.

It was an awful day for equities:

Oil, bank and raw-materials are the biggest laggards in Canada for the first time since at least 1988, fueling concern the nation’s economy is fading just as the U.S. is taking off.

The three industries, which collectively account for two-thirds of the Standard & Poor’s/TSX Composite Index, are the worst performers among 10 groups this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The nation’s largest banks joined oil and materials in a rout that erased 4.1 percent from the benchmark index in three days, including the biggest one-day retreat since June 2013.

The selloff in the biggest pillars of the Canadian equity market comes as data showing a weaker jobs market coupled with slowing exports suggest a tentative economic recovery. Banks have slumped as earnings last week collectively missed estimates amid declining trading revenue and sluggish consumer borrowing. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 Index has reached all-time highs on signs of accelerating growth.

The S&P 500/TSX tumbled 329.53 points, or 2.3 percent, to 14,144.17 yesterday as the selloff in oil accelerated, with energy companies plunging the most since August 2011 as crude dropped to a five-year low.

The Canadian benchmark equity gauge has plunged 9.7 percent since reaching a record on Sept. 3, wiping out more than C$270 billion in market value and reducing its gain for the year to 3.8 percent. The S&P/TSX, which was the second-best performing market among developed nations through the first half of the year, now ranks 16th.

Happy crowds of preferred share investors held parades for their portfolios today.

funeralProcession
Click for Big

And with TXPR and TXPL down 0.76% and 0.96%, why not?

It was an appallingly poor day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts off 24bp, FixedResets losing 85bp and DeemedRetractibles down 36bp. There is a very lengthy list of losers, dominated by FixedResets. Volume was high.

And given these massive changes, let’s have another look at some pictures of Implied Volatility. Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are

  • based on Implied Volatility Theory only
  • are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
  • assume constant GOC-5 yield
  • assume constant Implied Volatility
  • assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

ImpVol_TRP_141208A
Click for Big

So according to this, TRP.PR.A, bid at 21.36, is $0.57 cheap, but it has already reset. TRP.PR.B, bid at 17.20, is $0.55 cheap, but it resets 2015-6-30. TRP.PR.C, bid at 19.75, is $0.30 expensive, but it resets 2016-1-30. It looks like the market is beginning to realize that TRP.PR.C is overpriced.

ImpVol_MFC_141208
Click for Big

MFC implied volatility is still very high. The low-spread MFC.PR.F looks a little cheap … and it doesn’t reset until 2016-6-19.

ImpVol_BAM_141208
Click for Big

BAM.PR.X, with a +180bp spread, bid at 21.15, looks $0.79 cheap and doesn’t reset until 2017-6-30 – but Implied Volatility is still a little high and is dropping rapidly (a reduction in Implied Volatility flattens the curve and causes low-spread issues to underperform). BAM.PR.R, with a +230bp spread, bid at 25.51, looks $1.56 rich and resets 2016-6-30. So go figure that one out, wise guy.

ImpVol_FTS_141208
Click for Big

This is just weird because the middle is expensive and the ends are cheap but anyway … FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 20.00, looks $0.41 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp, and bid at 24.70, looks $0.54 expensive and resets 2019-3-1

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.3254 % 2,528.6
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.3254 % 4,003.2
Floater 2.98 % 3.09 % 62,509 19.42 4 -0.3254 % 2,688.0
OpRet 4.40 % -11.74 % 26,639 0.08 2 -0.0195 % 2,758.5
SplitShare 4.30 % 3.92 % 40,711 3.73 5 -0.2697 % 3,177.9
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0195 % 2,522.4
Perpetual-Premium 5.44 % -1.70 % 70,645 0.08 20 -0.4542 % 2,476.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.17 % 5.11 % 113,618 15.27 15 -0.2392 % 2,650.5
FixedReset 4.25 % 3.71 % 182,150 16.54 74 -0.8512 % 2,530.6
Deemed-Retractible 4.99 % 0.67 % 103,056 0.14 40 -0.3755 % 2,603.5
FloatingReset 2.54 % 1.89 % 60,065 0.08 5 -0.0861 % 2,550.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
TRP.PR.C FixedReset -3.51 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 19.80
Evaluated at bid price : 19.80
Bid-YTW : 3.92 %
ENB.PR.T FixedReset -3.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.28
Evaluated at bid price : 22.95
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset -3.36 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 20.40
Evaluated at bid price : 20.40
Bid-YTW : 3.87 %
MFC.PR.F FixedReset -3.35 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.75
Bid-YTW : 5.27 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset -3.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.10
Bid-YTW : 6.06 %
ENB.PR.P FixedReset -2.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.39
Evaluated at bid price : 23.12
Bid-YTW : 4.26 %
MFC.PR.I FixedReset -2.38 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-09-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.42
Bid-YTW : 3.73 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset -2.37 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.33
Bid-YTW : 5.83 %
HSE.PR.A FixedReset -2.27 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 19.35
Evaluated at bid price : 19.35
Bid-YTW : 4.21 %
ENB.PR.J FixedReset -2.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.84
Evaluated at bid price : 24.02
Bid-YTW : 4.21 %
ENB.PR.F FixedReset -1.87 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.72
Evaluated at bid price : 23.60
Bid-YTW : 4.17 %
ENB.PF.E FixedReset -1.86 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.88
Evaluated at bid price : 24.31
Bid-YTW : 4.24 %
ENB.PF.G FixedReset -1.85 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.88
Evaluated at bid price : 24.35
Bid-YTW : 4.25 %
ENB.PF.A FixedReset -1.81 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.92
Evaluated at bid price : 24.35
Bid-YTW : 4.22 %
MFC.PR.M FixedReset -1.74 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible -1.67 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.41
Bid-YTW : 5.89 %
BNS.PR.Y FixedReset -1.62 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.67
Bid-YTW : 3.44 %
IGM.PR.B Perpetual-Premium -1.52 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.00
Bid-YTW : 5.00 %
ENB.PF.C FixedReset -1.45 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.94
Evaluated at bid price : 24.44
Bid-YTW : 4.19 %
SLF.PR.A Deemed-Retractible -1.39 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.11
Bid-YTW : 5.20 %
GWO.PR.Q Deemed-Retractible -1.37 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.15
Bid-YTW : 5.06 %
BAM.PR.T FixedReset -1.36 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 23.36
Evaluated at bid price : 24.61
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %
SLF.PR.E Deemed-Retractible -1.34 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.77
Bid-YTW : 5.66 %
ENB.PR.D FixedReset -1.33 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.44
Evaluated at bid price : 23.05
Bid-YTW : 4.16 %
POW.PR.G Perpetual-Premium -1.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2021-04-15
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.65
Bid-YTW : 4.57 %
ENB.PR.H FixedReset -1.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 21.36
Evaluated at bid price : 21.36
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %
ELF.PR.H Perpetual-Premium -1.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 24.83
Evaluated at bid price : 25.30
Bid-YTW : 5.50 %
PWF.PR.T FixedReset -1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 23.39
Evaluated at bid price : 25.50
Bid-YTW : 3.71 %
SLF.PR.B Deemed-Retractible -1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.21
Bid-YTW : 5.20 %
PWF.PR.R Perpetual-Premium -1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2021-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.06
Bid-YTW : 4.85 %
GWO.PR.I Deemed-Retractible -1.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.00
Bid-YTW : 5.53 %
SLF.PR.I FixedReset -1.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.78
Bid-YTW : 2.56 %
BAM.PF.C Perpetual-Discount -1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 21.27
Evaluated at bid price : 21.56
Bid-YTW : 5.72 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
BMO.PR.P FixedReset 259,575 Desjardins crossed 200,000 at 25.32. TD crossed 53,600 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.30
Bid-YTW : 0.73 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 182,016 Will reset to 3.266% effective December 31. Nesbitt crossed 30,000 at 21.36. TD crossed 25,000 at the same price and Scotia crossed 30,000 at the same price again.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 21.36
Evaluated at bid price : 21.36
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
ENB.PR.T FixedReset 102,709 RBC crossed 50,700 at 23.15 and 21,800 at 23.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 22.28
Evaluated at bid price : 22.95
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %
BAM.PF.F FixedReset 87,304 Desjardins crossed 75,000 at 25.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.68
Bid-YTW : 4.09 %
FTS.PR.M FixedReset 73,932 RBC crossed 70,000 at 25.60.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-12-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.50
Bid-YTW : 3.69 %
MFC.PR.M FixedReset 54,843 Scotia crossed 35,000 at 25.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
There were 41 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 19.20 – 20.20
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.6772

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-08
Maturity Price : 19.20
Evaluated at bid price : 19.20
Bid-YTW : 2.75 %

MFC.PR.I FixedReset Quote: 25.42 – 25.95
Spot Rate : 0.5300
Average : 0.3221

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-09-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.42
Bid-YTW : 3.73 %

IGM.PR.B Perpetual-Premium Quote: 26.00 – 26.46
Spot Rate : 0.4600
Average : 0.2744

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.00
Bid-YTW : 5.00 %

MFC.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 24.81 – 25.23
Spot Rate : 0.4200
Average : 0.2506

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %

MFC.PR.F FixedReset Quote: 20.75 – 21.20
Spot Rate : 0.4500
Average : 0.2812

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.75
Bid-YTW : 5.27 %

MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.41 – 23.10
Spot Rate : 0.6900
Average : 0.5286

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.41
Bid-YTW : 5.89 %

New Issue: CM FixedReset, 3.75%+224

Tuesday, December 9th, 2014

The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has announced:

that it had entered into an agreement with a group of underwriters led by CIBC World Markets Inc. for an issue of 10 million Basel III-compliant non-cumulative Rate Reset Class A Preferred Shares, Series 41 (the “Series 41 Shares”) priced at $25.00 per Series 41 Share to raise gross proceeds of $250 million.

CIBC has granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional two million Series 41 Shares at the same offering price, exercisable at any time up to two days prior to closing. Should the underwriters’ option be fully exercised, the total gross proceeds of the financing will be $300 million.

The Series 41 Shares will yield 3.75% per annum, payable quarterly, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of CIBC, for an initial period ending January 31, 2020. On January 31, 2020, and on January 31 every five years thereafter, the dividend rate will reset to be equal to the then current five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 2.24%.

Subject to regulatory approval and certain provisions of the Series 41 Shares, on January 31, 2020 and on January 31 every five years thereafter, CIBC may, at its option, redeem all or any part of the then outstanding Series 41 Shares at par.

Subject to the right of redemption, holders of the Series 41 Shares will have the right to convert their shares into non-cumulative Floating Rate Class A Preferred Shares, Series 42 (the “Series 42 Shares”), subject to certain conditions, on January 31, 2020 and on January 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of the Series 42 Shares will be entitled to receive a quarterly floating rate dividend, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of CIBC, equal to the three-month Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 2.24%.

Holders of the Series 42 Shares may convert their Series 42 Shares into Series 41 Shares, subject to certain conditions, on January 31, 2025 and on January 31 every five years thereafter.

The expected closing date is December 16, 2014. CIBC will make an application to list the Series 41 Shares as of the closing date on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The net proceeds of this offering will be used for general purposes of CIBC.

CM has only one other FixedReset outstanding, CM.PR.O, which is a NVCC-compliant FixedReset, 3.90%+232, which commenced trading 2014-6-11 after being announced 2014-6-2.

CM.PR.E To Be Redeemed

Tuesday, December 9th, 2014

The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has announced:

its intention to redeem all of its issued and outstanding Non-cumulative Class A Preferred Shares Series 27 (TSX: CM.PR.E), for cash. The redemption will occur on January 31, 2015. The redemption price is $25.00 per Series 27 share.

The $0.350000 quarterly dividend announced on December 4, 2014 will be the final dividend on the Series 27 shares and will be paid on January 28, 2015, covering the period to January 31, 2015, to shareholders of record on December 29, 2014.

Holders of the Series 27 shares should contact the financial institution, broker or other intermediary through which they hold the shares to confirm how they will receive their redemption proceeds.

CM.PR.E is a NVCC-compliant Straight Perpetual paying 5.60% of par. It has been tracked by HIMIPref™ and is currently assigned to the PerpetualPremium index.

New Issue: TD FixedReset, 3.75%+225

Saturday, December 6th, 2014

The Toronto-Dominion Bank has announced:

a domestic public offering of Non-Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series 5 (the “Series 5 Shares”).

TD has entered into an agreement with a group of underwriters led by TD Securities Inc. to issue, on a bought deal basis, 12 million Series 5 Shares at a price of $25.00 per share to raise gross proceeds of $300 million. TD has also granted the underwriters an option to purchase, on the same terms, up to an additional 2 million Series 5 Shares. This option is exercisable in whole or in part by the underwriters at any time up to two business days prior to closing.

The Series 5 Shares will yield 3.75% annually, payable quarterly, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of TD, for the initial period ending January 31, 2020. Thereafter, the dividend rate will reset every five years at a level of 2.25% over the then five-year Government of Canada bond yield.

Subject to regulatory approval, on January 31, 2020 and on January 31 every 5 years thereafter, TD may redeem the Series 5 Shares, in whole or in part, at $25.00 per share. Subject to TD’s right of redemption, holders of the Series 5 Shares will have the right to convert their shares into Non-Cumulative Floating Rate Preferred Shares, Series 6 (the “Series 6 Shares”), subject to certain conditions, on January 31, 2020, and on January 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of the Series 6 Shares will be entitled to receive quarterly floating dividends, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of TD, equal to the three-month Government of Canada Treasury bill yield plus 2.25%.

The expected closing date is December 16, 2014. TD will make an application to list the Series 5 Shares as of the closing date on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The net proceeds of the offering will be used for general corporate purposes.

Later, they announced:

that as a result of strong investor demand for its previously announced domestic public offering of Non-Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series 5 (the “Series 5 Shares”), the size of the offering has been increased to 20 million Series 5 Shares. The gross proceeds of the offering will now be $500 million. The offering will be underwritten by a group of underwriters led by TD Securities Inc.

I can’t say the Implied Volatility calculation is particularly helpful, but I’ll show it anyway:

impVol_TD_141205
Click for Big

December 5, 2014

Friday, December 5th, 2014

Jobs, jobs, jobs!

A November surprise that included a jump in wages as well as the biggest hiring surge in almost three years suggests the world’s largest economy is putting aside doubts about the strength of the expansion.

The 321,000 advance in payrolls followed a 243,000 increase in October that was stronger than previously reported, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington. The jobless rate held at a six-year low of 5.8 percent and earnings rose by the most since June of last year.

The breadth of industries hiring last month was the broadest since 1998, a sign the benefits of the expansion were rippling through the economy.

Factory payrolls rose by the most in a year, professional and business services companies took on more employees than at any time since November 2010, financial firms boosted payrolls by the most since early 2012 and hiring at retailers picked up.

The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose to 2.31 percent at 2:47 p.m. in New York from 2.24 percent late yesterday. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index, which tracks the greenback against 10 trading partners, gained 0.8 percent, and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index advanced 0.2 percent.

Up north, not so much:

The Canadian dollar reached a five-year low as data showed the economy lost jobs in November while U.S. payrolls swelled, adding to speculation the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates before the Bank of Canada.

The currency erased a weekly gain as the report showed employment fell by 10,700 jobs. The drop bolstered a Bank of Canada statement this week that, while the recovery shows signs of broadening, the labor market “continues to indicate significant slack in the economy.” The nation added 117,200 jobs over the previous two months.

Canadian government bonds fell, pushing the yield on the benchmark 10-year security up five basis points, or 0.05 percentage point, to 1.96 percent. It reached 1.98 percent, the highest level since Nov. 25. The price of the debt dropped 46 cents to C$104.67.

Employment declined after jumps of 43,100 and 74,100 the last two months, Statistics Canada said today from Ottawa. The unemployment rate rose to 6.6 percent from a six-year low of 6.5 percent. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News projected employment would be unchanged and the jobless rate would rise to 6.6 percent, according to median forecasts.

And things are still sluggish in Germany:

But Germany’s Bundesbank halved its 2015 growth forecast for Germany to 1.0 per cent and also cut its estimate for this year to 1.4 per cent from a forecast of 1.9 per cent made in June. It also trimmed its prediction for 2016 to 1.6 per cent.

“However, there is reason to hope that the current sluggish phase will prove to be short-lived,” Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann said in a statement, adding that opportunities abroad would likely increase again next year.

He also said that if crude oil prices remained subdued for a longer period, gross domestic product (GDP) could expand by an additional 0.1-0.2 percentage points in both 2015 and 2016.

… and in Italy:

Standard & Poor’s cut Italy’s sovereign credit rating on Friday from triple-B to triple-B-minus, just one notch above junk, saying weak growth and poor competitiveness undermined the sustainability of its huge public debt.

The downgrade is a blow for Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, who came to office in February pledging an ambitious reform agenda to lift Italy out of recession, but has seen the economy continue to shrink.

S&P said the new triple-B-minus rating carried a stable outlook. It forecast Italian economic growth would be just 0.2 per cent in 2015 and would average 0.5 per cent in 2014-2017.

As recently as June, the agency had confirmed Italy’s triple-B rating and forecast average growth of 1.0 per cent over the three-year period.

Italy’s economy is expected to shrink in 2014 for the third consecutive year.

There’s an interesting paper by Gregory Thwaites titled Why are real interest rates so low? Secular stagnation and the relative price of investment goods:

Over the past four decades, real interest rates have risen then fallen across the industrialised world. Over the same period, nominal investment rates are down, while house prices and household debt are up. I explain these four trends with a fifth – the widespread fall in the relative price of investment goods. I present a simple closed-economy OLG model in which households finance retirement in part by selling claims on the corporate sector (capital goods) accumulated over their working lives. As capital goods prices fall, the interest rate must fall to reflect capital losses. And in the long run, a given quantity of saving buys more capital goods. This has ambiguous effects on interest rates in the long run: if the production function is inelastic, in line with most estimates in the literature, interest rates stay low even after relative prices have stopped falling. Lower interest rates reduce the user cost of housing, raising house prices and, given that housing is bought early in life, increasing household debt. I extend the model to allow for a heterogeneous bequest motive, and show that wealth inequality rises but consumption inequality falls. I test the model on cross-country data and find support for its assumptions and predictions. The analysis in this paper shows recent debates on macroeconomic imbalances and household and government indebtedness in a new light. In particular, low real interest rates may be the new normal. The debt of the young provides an alternative outlet for the retirement savings of the old; preventing the accumulation of debt, for example through macroprudential policy, leads to a bigger fall in interest rates.

This paper fleshes out a new, complementary explanation for the falls in real interest rates, rises in household debt and falling investment rates across the industrialised world. The story is based on the widespread fall in the price of investment goods – the machines, equipment and buildings that firms buy – relative to the prices of other things the economy produces. This fall has reduced the demand for savings, rather than the supply.

This makes sense to me. When you’re starting a business, you don’t (usually) need $100-million for a new factory any more; $10,000 for a couple of new computers will (often) do the trick. Thanks to Ian McGugan of the Globe for writing a review.

It’s a black day … the UK is redeeming some perps:

U.K. Chancellor George Osborne is to repay the state’s century-old war debt. By current standards, the undated stock is expensive for the government to service. Terms give holders of the hard-to-trade bond a decent payoff. It looks like a win-win. Time could prove a harsher judge of the deal.

The British government issued its War Loan in 1917. At first, the undated debt offered a yield of 5 per cent. It was restructured in 1947 to pay 3.5 per cent. Even that lower figure looks expensive by current standards. Weak economic growth and low inflation have suppressed long-dated yields. Ten-year UK government debt gives only 2 per cent at present.

I’ve always been fond of the British perps … fortunately, my all-time favourite, the 2.5% annuities issued in 1853 are still outstanding … all £1-million of them!

BSD.PR.A was confirmed at Pfd-4(low) by DBRS:

As of December 1, 2014, the Portfolio consisted of 72.0% Canadian common stock, 22.0% REITs, 4.0% limited partnerships and 2.0% Canadian preferred stock. The rating was last confirmed in December 2013 and performance has been generally positive in the first half year of 2014, but has since been volatile. Downside protection available to holders of the Preferred Securities rose to 29.9% in June 2014, but has since been volatile, dropping to approximately 20.0% at the end of November 2014 (similar to November 2013 levels). The yield on the Portfolio has decreased slightly, causing the distribution coverage ratio to drop to 0.70 times (as of November 28, 2014). The rating on the Preferred Securities continues to be constrained by the large percentage of underlying securities in the Portfolio that are not rated by any rating agency and the grind on the Portfolio due to distributions exceeding income.

I suggest that preferred share investors stop looking at their monitors and go for a nice walk … like this guy:

endOfTheWorld

It was another awful day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts losing 38bp, FixedResets down 36bp and DeemedRetractibles off 5bp. Another lengthy Performance Report is – again – dominated by losing FixedResets which are – again – predominantly lower spread and Enbridge issues. Despite four issues (recent heavy losers) breaking the 100,000 share barrier, volume was slightly below average.

All this poor performance by the lower-reset issues should imply a decrease in Implied Volatility, so here are some pictures:

impVol_TRP_141205
Click for Big

So according to this, TRP.PR.A, bid at 21.40, is $0.74 cheap, but it has already reset. TRP.PR.B, bid at 17.37, is $0.60 cheap, but it resets 2015-6-30. TRP.PR.C, bid at 20.52, is $0.86 expensive, but it resets 2016-1-30. So an alternative way of resolving the differences between these three issues is to expect the GOC-5 yield to stay at 1.48% until TRP.PR.B resets, but to increase to about 1.72% prior to TRP.PR.C resetting.

impVol_MFC_141205
Click for Big

MFC volatility is still very high. The low-spread MFC.PR.F looks a little cheap … and it doesn’t reset until 2016-6-19.

impVol_BAM_141205
Click for Big

BAM.PR.X, with a +180bp spread, bid at 21.40, looks $1.06 cheap and doesn’t reset until 2017-6-30. BAM.PR.R, with a +230bp spread, bid at 25.71, looks $1.48 rich and resets 2016-6-30. So go figure that one out, wise guy.

impVol_FTS_141205
Click for Big

This is just weird because the middle is expensive and the ends are cheap but anyway … FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 20.01, looks $0.39 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp, and bid at 24.81, looks $0.56 expensive and resets 2019-3-1.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.7412 % 2,536.8
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.7412 % 4,016.3
Floater 2.97 % 3.08 % 62,774 19.45 4 0.7412 % 2,696.8
OpRet 4.40 % -11.75 % 26,721 0.08 2 -0.0195 % 2,759.0
SplitShare 4.28 % 3.84 % 40,220 3.74 5 -0.3663 % 3,186.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0195 % 2,522.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.41 % -2.53 % 73,249 0.09 20 0.0117 % 2,487.7
Perpetual-Discount 5.16 % 5.06 % 114,478 15.34 15 -0.3773 % 2,656.8
FixedReset 4.21 % 3.63 % 194,795 16.75 74 -0.3560 % 2,552.4
Deemed-Retractible 4.97 % -0.83 % 102,250 0.15 40 -0.0505 % 2,613.3
FloatingReset 2.53 % 1.87 % 59,644 3.48 5 0.3221 % 2,552.8
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
SLF.PR.G FixedReset -2.48 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.70
Bid-YTW : 5.60 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset -2.46 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.80
Bid-YTW : 5.46 %
TRP.PR.B FixedReset -2.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 17.37
Evaluated at bid price : 17.37
Bid-YTW : 3.85 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset -1.81 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 21.11
Evaluated at bid price : 21.11
Bid-YTW : 3.65 %
ENB.PR.B FixedReset -1.54 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 22.92
Evaluated at bid price : 23.73
Bid-YTW : 3.96 %
CGI.PR.D SplitShare -1.51 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2023-06-14
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.85
Bid-YTW : 3.84 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset -1.44 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 20.52
Evaluated at bid price : 20.52
Bid-YTW : 3.68 %
MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible -1.43 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.79
Bid-YTW : 5.67 %
ENB.PR.H FixedReset -1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 21.33
Evaluated at bid price : 21.63
Bid-YTW : 4.15 %
ENB.PR.N FixedReset -1.27 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 22.90
Evaluated at bid price : 24.10
Bid-YTW : 4.10 %
ENB.PR.D FixedReset -1.27 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 22.62
Evaluated at bid price : 23.36
Bid-YTW : 4.02 %
PWF.PR.S Perpetual-Discount 1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 24.10
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 4.93 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 1.54 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 17.18
Evaluated at bid price : 17.18
Bid-YTW : 3.08 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
HSE.PR.A FixedReset 145,346 Nesbitt crossed 127,800 at 19.63.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 19.80
Evaluated at bid price : 19.80
Bid-YTW : 4.02 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 132,032 Will reset at 3.266%. Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 21.36.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 21.40
Evaluated at bid price : 21.40
Bid-YTW : 3.85 %
ENB.PF.G FixedReset 122,942 RBC crossed blocks of 77,600 shares, 15,000 and 21,100, all at 24.85.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 23.05
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 4.08 %
ENB.PF.C FixedReset 102,155 Desjardins sold blocks of 49,200 and 46,300 to anonymous, both at 24.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 23.08
Evaluated at bid price : 24.80
Bid-YTW : 4.05 %
TD.PR.S FixedReset 98,336 TD crossed 90,000 at 25.42.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.35
Bid-YTW : 3.03 %
TRP.PR.E FixedReset 67,400 RBC crossed 62,000 at 25.55.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 23.30
Evaluated at bid price : 25.40
Bid-YTW : 3.67 %
There were 24 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PVS.PR.C SplitShare Quote: 25.90 – 26.90
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.8043

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-12-10
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.90
Bid-YTW : 3.17 %

TD.PR.R Deemed-Retractible Quote: 26.27 – 26.88
Spot Rate : 0.6100
Average : 0.4440

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-04
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 26.27
Bid-YTW : -12.23 %

ENB.PR.B FixedReset Quote: 23.73 – 24.23
Spot Rate : 0.5000
Average : 0.3427

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 22.92
Evaluated at bid price : 23.73
Bid-YTW : 3.96 %

MFC.PR.H FixedReset Quote: 25.90 – 26.45
Spot Rate : 0.5500
Average : 0.4146

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.90
Bid-YTW : 2.90 %

MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.79 – 23.27
Spot Rate : 0.4800
Average : 0.3517

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.79
Bid-YTW : 5.67 %

FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.51 – 25.00
Spot Rate : 0.4900
Average : 0.3672

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-05
Maturity Price : 24.07
Evaluated at bid price : 24.51
Bid-YTW : 5.01 %

Deriving Reset Yields: Mystery Partially Resolved

Friday, December 5th, 2014

In the post Deriving a Reset Yield, I noted a huge difference in the GOC-5 Yield used as a base for the resets of TRP.PR.A, AZP.PR.A and FFH.PR.C.

As it turns out, the calculation for TRP.PR.A was correctly based on the December 1 GOC-5 yield at 10am, while the calculations for the FFH was correctly based on the December 2 figure. AZP is still a bit of a mystery.

If we look at TRP.PR.A: SEDAR TransCanada Corporation Sep 23 2009 16:14:12 ET Prospectus supplement – English PDF 127 K, we find the definitions (emphasis added):

‘‘Fixed Rate Calculation Date’’ means, for any Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the 30th day prior to the first day of such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period.

‘‘Subsequent Fixed Rate Period’’ means, for the initial Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the period from and including December 31, 2014, to but excluding December 31, 2019, and for each succeeding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period means the period from and including the day immediately following the last day of the immediately preceding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period to but excluding December 31 in the fifth year thereafter.

… while for FFH.PR.C, SEDAR Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited Sep 29 2009 18:40:58 ET Prospectus supplement – English PDF 419 K, we find (emphasis added):

“Fixed Rate Calculation Date” means, for any Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the 30th day prior to the first day of such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period.

“Subsequent Fixed Rate Period” means for the initial Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on and including December 31, 2019 and for each succeeding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the period commencing on the day immediately following the end of the immediately preceding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period and ending on and including December 31 in the fifth year thereafter.

… while for AZP.PR.B, SEDAR Atlantic Power Preferred Equity Ltd. Oct 21 2009 17:20:19 ET Final short form prospectus – English PDF 229 K, we find (emphasis added):

“Fixed Rate Calculation Date” means, for any Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the 30th day prior to the first day of such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period.

“Subsequent Fixed Rate Period” means the period from and including December 31, 2014 to, but excluding, December 31, 2019 and each five year period thereafter from and including the day immediately following the end of the immediately preceding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period to, but excluding, December 31 in the fifth year thereafter.

So as it turns out, the critical element is the precise definition of the “Subsequent Fixed Rate Period”; TRP was quite correct in calculating their figure on December 1 and FFH was quite correct in calculating their figure on December 2.

Investor Relations at TRP (who are now my favourite people) sent me the following screenshot justifying their calculation:

GOC5_TRP_141201_10am
Click for Big

So that number of 1.346% that I calculated in the original post was justified. I have good reason to hope that I will shortly be receiving the screenshot for the December 2 calculation; if I get it, I’ll update this post.

I’ll have to call Atlantic Power again, since I continue to have problems with AZP: the calculation was performed on December 1, the same as TRP. As previously reported on PrefBlog, Atlantic Power stated:

The Reset Dividend Rate will be calculated on December 1, 2014

… but it looks like they used 1.39% as the GOC-5 rate and I don’t know where that number comes from.

Update, 2014-12-5: Here’s the screenshot for the FFH reset … 1.428%, as determined earlier:

prefFFHReset
Click for Big

… and a big THANK YOU for John Varnell at Fairfax!

What Is The Yield Of HSE.PR.A?

Friday, December 5th, 2014

Assiduous Reader B writes in and says:

I am a subscriber to your monthly newsletter but haven’t notice anything recent on this issue

My question is why would investors embrace the new issue at a yield of 4.50% while selling down the existing A issue which is now paying a yield that is a full percentage point higher.

I recognize the higher reset rate but the yield spread still seems excessive.

Thanks for your assistance

So, since he’s a customer I answered; and I said:

I will address your question in a post on prefblog.com tonight, but in the meantime can you tell me why you believe that HSE.PR.A is yielding a full percentage point higher?

… and he responded:

Thanks James for getting back to me – according to my screen on TD, HSE PR A is yielding 5.68 – the new issue is yielding 4.50% – I know there is something to be said for the extra reset pickup but the difference in current yield seems excessive

… and he included a picture:

HSEPRAquote
Click for Big

OK, so his first mistake is getting advice – even advice on such a simple thing as yield – from a bank. You should never seek advice or analysis from a bank, because they’re all domeless wonderboys, with about enough brains to say “We’re big!” and not much else.

In this particular case, TD has told him that the yield on HSE.PR.A, when quoted at 19.56-59, is 5.6789%, which a little experimentation tells us, is the Current Yield Ask, that is to say, the Current Dividend, 1.1125, divided by the Ask Price of 19.59, equals 5.6789178%, where I have tacked another three decimal places on to their reported figure just to sneer at the bank and their precious four decimal places of meaningless precision.

Never Use Current Yield When Analyzing Preferreds

It isn’t even accurate when evaluating Straight Perpetuals (since the relationship between the calculation date and the next payment date is a significant source of error), and is absolutely hopeless when evaluating something that may be called (which is not important in this case) or which is expected to experience a change in dividend (which is very important in this case).

Assiduous Reader B has made the mistake of assuming that the Issue Reset Spread is of minor importance, a mere adjustment to Current Yield, but in this case the projected dividend is so different from the current dividend that he’s wrong.

HSE.PR.A is a FixedReset, 4.45%+173, that commenced trading 2011-3-18 after being announced 2011-3-10. It resets in March, 2016, and if the GOC-5 yield continues to be at its yield of 1.45%, the reset rate will be 3.18%, a 29% drop from current levels.

One chart I am particularly fond of illustrates the relative importance of the Current Dividend vs. the Issue Reset Spread for FixedResets that may be assumed to be perpetual (which is a pretty good bet in this case):

PL_141114_App_FR_Chart_17
Click For Big

Given that HSE.PR.A resets in a little over one year, we see that the headline figure, 4.45%, contributes less than 10% of the valuation of the instrument – all the rest is entirely up to the Issue Reset Spread.

So, given that we know the importance of the Issue Reset Spread, how can we work out the all in yield of the issue in order to allow us to compare HSE.PR.A to the new issue, which is a FixedReset, 4.50%+313?

The answer is to use the Yield Calculator for Resets, which is an Excel Spreadsheet I have made available to the public, linked on the Right-Hand Navigation Panel under the heading “Calculators”. [Update: Note that this calculator has been improved since this post was written; the input of the data has been simplified. … JH 2015-8-7] [and a very minor modification added 2023-9-27 … JH 2023-9-27] It should be noticed that this is not a magic black box, nor is it particularly sophisticated. It’s simply a tool to allow a schedule of cash flows to be input into a spreadsheet easily. So to use the tool, we input our data into the yellow boxes. We’ll get the results of the calculation in the green boxes and the calculation is performed in the turquoise boxes;; we don’t touch them. Only touch the yellow boxes:

  • Current Price: we’ll put in 19.59, because that’s what the bank used.
  • Call Price: You can put in the call price here, but we’re not expecting the issue to be called – we expect it to remain outstanding in 25 years. So what will the price be in 25 years? There are various approaches to this, one of which is discussed in PrefLetter, but it’s reasonable to assume that in 25 years it will be priced the same as it is now, so we’ll put in 19.59. If you don’t like 19.59, put in some other number. It’s not magic. The Yield Calculation Police won’t take you away if you put in some other number. But your calculation is only as good as your assumptions, so if you calculate a very high yield by inputting some silly price – like $50.00 – as the end-price, well, your calculation is only as good as your assumptions.
  • Settlement Date: Strictly speaking, we should put in the date that a trade executed today will settle (2014-12-9), but I usually use the Trade Date, on the grounds that the bank won’t even let you enter the order unless you’ve got money available RIGHT NOW to pay for it. So I’ll input 2014-12-4.
  • Call Date: If it was priced at $26.00 and I was expecting it to be called, I would put in the call date. But I expect it to be around in twenty-five years (the maximum allowable in this spreadsheet) so I’ll put in 2039-12-4. Again, it’s up to you. If detailed examination of the numerological code embedded in The Gospel According To St. Mark has convinced you that it will be priced at 21.13 on 2028-7-8, go ahead and put in that call price and that date. Don’t worry about the Yield Calculation Police, I’ve paid them off.
  • Quarterly Dividend: So what dividend does it pay right now, expressed as a quarterly amount? I hate using a calculator to calculate six decimal places, so I will input a tiny Excel formula “=25 * 0.0445 / 4”, that is, “equal to the par value times the annual coupon rate divided by four”.
  • Cycle: This gets a little tricky, because we need to know the pay-date of each dividend. A little research tells us it’s paid on the last day of each quarter, March / June / September / December, which is cycle 3. So plug in “3”
  • Pay Date: So what day of these months? It’s the last day, so plug in “31”. In the cash flow schedule, the calculated date “June 31” will be transformed to “July 1”, as you can see in the turquoise area to the right of the data input area. This is a bit of an error, but a very tiny one.
  • Include First Dividend: This is quite important. As the spreadsheet tells you, the next dividend payment is December 31, based on the information you’ve input above. If you buy it today, will you earn that dividend? You’ll have to look up the ex-dividend date for the issue; in this case the ex-dividend date was 2014-11-25, which is now in the past, so you WON’T get the next dividend, so input “0”
  • First Dividend Value: For most issues, the first dividend payment is for a different amount from the others, since it’s adjusted to reflect the time from the security’s issue to the pay date, rather than pay-date to pay-date. HSE.PR.A has been around for a long time, so this does not apply and we’re not even earning the next dividend anyway, so it doubly doesn’t matter. Leave this field blank.
  • Reset Date: The issue resets 2016-3-31. Plug in this date
  • Quarterly Dividend After Reset: This is the moment we’ve all been waiting for! We have to estimate what the dividend will be after the reset, while bearing in mind that the yield we calculate will only be as good as our estimates. It’s generally best to assume that major market yields will not change; that on the reset calculation date the 5-year GOC yield will be the same as it is today, 1.45%. But if you feel this is unreasonable, put in another number you’re more comfortable with. If you think that 1.45% is ridiculous and that GOC-5 will be 2.00% on recalculation day, use 2.00%. You have to use some kind of assumption, there’s no way around that. We will note that TD’s calculation, in using Current Yield, assumed the dividend would not change; i.e., that the dividend would reset to be equal to the 4.45% it is currently, i.e., that GOC-5 on reset calculation date will be 2.72%. Well, if that’s the number you want to use, go ahead. It’s a free country and you can assume anything you like. Just remember that the quality of your yield estimate will reflect the quality of your assumptions; and also remember that consistency is a virtue, so if two issues are resetting at the same time, you should use the same estimate for GOC-5. But I will assume a future GOC-5 rate of 1.45%, so I’ll input the Excel formula “=25 * (0.0145 + 0.0173) / 4” = par value * (sum of assumed GOC-5 rate and Issue Reset Spread [expressed annually]) divided by 4 [quarters per year]. We should also note that the spreadsheet makes no provision for changes in GOC-5, so if you feel that GOC-5 will be 2.00% on the 2016 reset calculation date, but 3.00% on the 2021 reset calculation date, you’ll have to develop your own elaboration of this spreadsheet.

And that’s the end of our input and our answer pops up in the green boxes! Current Yield, 5.68%, just as advertised by TD, but an Annualized Quarterly Yield To Call of 4.17%. That’s quite a difference! And, I will note, it is substantially less than the New Issue FixedReset, 4.50%+313. Implied Volatility Theory tells us to expect less for a deeply discounted issue compared to one at or near par value, but just how much less it should be is a whole ‘nuther issue.

And, I suggest, you should always think of this number as “4.17%, assuming an end-price of 19.59 and a constant GOC-5 of 1.45%”, just to remind yourself of the two critical assumptions you made.

So there you have it. I suggest that those interested in using this spreadsheet as an adjunct to their trading first check all the calculations – Trust But Verify! – and second, play around with it a bit. Change the assumptions of end-price and GOC-5 estimate on reset, see how sensitive the answers are to the inputs. The better you understand your data, the better an investor you’ll be.

December 4, 2014

Thursday, December 4th, 2014

Europe is inching towards quantitative easing:

Mario Draghi dragged the European Central Bank toward more monetary stimulus with a pledge to assess the need early next year, disappointing some investors seeking faster action.

Even as he unveiled “substantially” lower forecasts for euro-area inflation and economic growth, the ECB president said officials will wait to evaluate whether they’re doing enough to revive the weakest consumer-price growth in five years. They are already intensifying preparations for further measures, including studying the merits of buying government debt.

If policy makers do see a need to combat a prolonged period of low inflation then “this would imply altering early next year the size, pace and composition of our measures,” Draghi told reporters in Frankfurt after his Governing Council met to set policy for the last time in 2014. “We don’t need unanimity” on the 24-member council to act, he said.

The ECB Governing Council expects to consider a proposal for a broad-based asset program including sovereign debt next month, according to two euro-area central-bank officials familiar with deliberations who asked not to be identified because the discussion is private. The package is envisaged to include various types of bonds, but no equities, and has yet to be designed, the people said.

Canadian equities got hammered:

Canadian stocks fell the most in more than a year as the nation’s biggest banks posted results that missed estimates and energy shares resumed a selloff with the price of crude.

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD), the country’s largest lender by assets, tumbled the most in more than five years after posting fourth-quarter profit short of estimates. Energy stocks tumbled 2.1 percent as a group as oil fell. Canadian Oil Sands Ltd. (COS) sank 16 percent to a decade low after slashing its dividend. Enbridge Inc. jumped 10 percent to a record on plans to transfer C$17 billion ($14.9 billion) in assets to a fund.

The Standard & Poor’s/TSX Composite Index (SPTSX) slumped 284.11 points, or 1.9 percent, to 14,469.95 at 4 p.m. in Toronto, the biggest drop since June 2013. The equities benchmark pared its gain to 6.2 percent this year.

All of the 10 industries in the S&P/TSX dropped at least 0.6 percent on trading volume 45 percent higher than the 30-day average today. Global equities slumped after the European Central Bank said policy makers will reassess stimulus next quarter, damping hopes for additional bond purchases this year.

And whenever there’s a big market move there’s only one party at fault:

A nearly 1 per cent drop in the S&P/TSX composite index in the final hour of trading Thursday was due to a large order from Goldman Sachs to sell a basket of Canadian stocks, according to a note from the Bank of Montreal.

Canada’s main stock index recorded one of its biggest declines of the year on Thursday, as investors reacted to another push lower in the price of crude oil as well as a disappointing earnings report from Toronto-Dominion Bank.

According to BMO, the Goldman Sachs sell order was for approximately $600-million in a broad selection of Canadian stocks, but many were in the banking and energy sectors. The heaviest volumes sold by Goldman were shares in Royal Bank of Canada, TD Bank, Bank of Nova Scotia, Bank of Montreal, Canadian Natural Resources, Enbridge and Suncor.

The TSX closed down 284.1 points, or 1.93 per cent, at 14,469.95, far outpacing the 0.12 per cent fall in the S&P 500. The Canadian index had been down nearly 1 per cent prior to 3 p.m. (ET), which is around when the Goldman order was believed to be transacted.

The feds are shilling for the Toronto Exchange:

The Canadian government has approved Burger King Worldwide Inc.’s purchase of Tim Hortons Inc. on condition it maintains employment levels and list the company in Toronto.

To win approval under the nation’s foreign takeover law, Burger King has agreed to “work with Tim Hortons (THI) franchisees” to maintain employment levels across Canada, and accelerate expansion of new restaurants outside Canada at a “significantly greater pace than currently planned,” Industry Minister James Moore said in a statement.

Burger King has also agreed to establish the new company’s headquarters in Oakville, Ontario and list on the Toronto Stock Exchange, according to the statement. Other commitments include managing Tim Hortons as a “distinct brand” that won’t be co-branded with Burger King and the maintenance of franchise rent and royalty structure at current levels for the next five years.

Yay! Micromanagement and central planning! Soon we’ll all be RICH!

Bond salesmen won’t be rich, though (emphasis added):

Four of Canada’s six biggest banks have posted quarterly declines in trading, dragged down by plunging bond markets in October and one-time changes to how lenders value uncollaterized derivatives.

Toronto-Dominion Bank’s trading revenue dropped 14 percent to C$296 million ($260 million) in the period ended Oct. 31 from a year earlier, led by declines in interest-rate and credit trading, the company said today. The lender recorded a C$65 million pretax charge in its wholesale bank tied to the valuation adjustment.

Bank of Montreal (BMO) trading revenue tumbled 21 percent to C$186 million as fixed-income trading plunged 79 percent from a year earlier, the bank said in a Dec. 2 statement. The valuation adjustment reduced revenue by C$39 million.

CIBC trading revenue fell 81 percent to C$27 million, with a C$98 million loss in interest-rates trading, the Toronto-based bank said today in a statement. The lender said it recorded an C$82 million after-tax charge tied to funding valuation adjustments.

Trimming Capital

Royal Bank’s total trading revenue slid 43 percent to C$371 million, fueled by a 70 percent drop in trading of interest-rate and credit securities, the Toronto-based bank said yesterday. Royal Bank had a C$51 million after-tax charge tied to the adjustments.

Royal Bank has been trimming the capital devoted to bond trading as global regulations meant to prevent another credit crisis make it one of the lender’s most costly businesses, CFO Janice Fukakusa said.

So bond market liquidity just got a little worse. Just in time for the long-awaited crash due to policy rate changes!

I try to restrain myself from ranting on non-preferred share issues on this soap-box, but every now and then something irritates me enough that I think it would be a shame to deprive you of my views. Today’s rant is about a Bloomberg story titled Princeton Has a Shadow Fraternity System Nobody Controls. So in the first place, the headline is nonsense. The ‘shadow fraternity system’ certainly is under control by somebody, how could it be otherwise? The writer is merely upset that it’s not controlled by people of whom he approves.

When Princeton officials learned that a student had mass-emailed a photo of a woman performing oral sex at one of its 11 eating clubs (social clubs that resemble fraternities), it quietly began investigating the matter. Despite the fact that passing around a photo of a sex act without the consent of those pictured is a crime in New Jersey, the university did not inform local police. The school’s squeamish approach to the incident raises questions about how it can discipline its students — and abide by stricter government guidelines for handling sexual assault — when so much of social life at the institution lives outside the walls of campus.

“Our investigation began as soon as we received a report, just days after the alleged incident,” says Martin Mbugua, a University spokesman. The Princeton Police Department only found out about the email three weeks later, when an anonymous third party notified the police chief. Any misbehavior at the Tiger Inn, headquartered in a stately mansion on a street just off the main campus, technically falls under the jurisdiction of local police.

In November, the Department of Education found that Princeton botched its response to reports of sexual assault and the University formally agreed to tighten its handling of alleged sexual crimes. New guidelines implemented by the government require schools to investigate sexual violence reports that occur outside of school grounds if the incident has “continuing effects on campus.”

So the university is on the defensive about not being an official informer, and are expected to be Junior Policemen with respect to sexual violence. Sorry, buddies: these are university students we are talking about here – young men and young women. If they want something to be a police matter, they should be expected to know how to contact the police themselves. Junior Police and a Junior Justice System with the power to expel students are not the answer to anything. But meanwhile, the politicians bleat that 20-year olds are old enough to die in Afghanistan, but not old enough to take responsibility for themselves, and drip crocodile tears over the rising cost of tuition due to administrative overload.

There was one cry on the lips of FixedReset investors today:

clobberinTime

One thing I can’t help but highlighting, given the horrible (second-worst) performance of TRP.PR.C today, is the Implied Volatility analysis for the TRP FixedResets:

impVol_TRP_141204
Click for Big

Assiduous Readers will recognize that the overall appearance of the graph has not changed from the chart published as of the close on December 2, but Alert Assiduous Readers will notice that the fit to theory is much better. On Tuesday I asserted that:

Prices for the TRP issues are very strange: consider that TRP.PR.A, bid at 21.15, is priced lower than TRP.PR.C, which is a FixedReset, 4.40%+154, resetting 2016-1-30, bid at 21.77. … TRP.PR.A is now $1.44 cheap while TRP.PR.C is $1.73 expensive

Well, that was then. Now I say that TRP.PR.A is bid at 21.39 and is $0.89 cheap, while TRP.PR.C is bid at 20.82 and is $1.06 expensive. So according to me, there’s more adjustment yet to come!

Despite that – and despite a reported 42bp decline in TXPR and a 79bp hit for TXPL – it was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market today, with PerpetualDiscounts off 6bp, FixedResets down 62bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 4bp. There is a very lengthy list of performance highlights, just like the old days of 2008, dominated of course by FixedReset losers with a large contingent of Enbridge issues, spooked by the credit muttering. Volume was average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0285 % 2,518.1
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0285 % 3,986.7
Floater 2.99 % 3.10 % 63,408 19.41 4 0.0285 % 2,677.0
OpRet 4.39 % -11.90 % 27,137 0.08 2 -0.0390 % 2,759.6
SplitShare 4.27 % 3.63 % 41,879 3.75 5 0.0791 % 3,198.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0390 % 2,523.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.41 % -2.69 % 73,001 0.09 20 0.0605 % 2,487.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.14 % 5.03 % 115,315 15.40 15 -0.0652 % 2,666.9
FixedReset 4.20 % 3.58 % 196,880 8.57 74 -0.6162 % 2,561.5
Deemed-Retractible 4.97 % -0.69 % 94,662 0.15 40 0.0446 % 2,614.7
FloatingReset 2.54 % 1.88 % 60,146 3.48 5 -0.1569 % 2,544.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
HSE.PR.A FixedReset -4.34 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 19.61
Evaluated at bid price : 19.61
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset -3.92 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 20.82
Evaluated at bid price : 20.82
Bid-YTW : 3.63 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset -3.41 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.50
Evaluated at bid price : 21.50
Bid-YTW : 3.58 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset -3.20 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.30
Bid-YTW : 5.16 %
ENB.PR.Y FixedReset -2.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.14
Evaluated at bid price : 22.75
Bid-YTW : 4.17 %
ENB.PR.H FixedReset -2.45 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.63
Evaluated at bid price : 21.91
Bid-YTW : 4.09 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset -1.87 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 19.97
Evaluated at bid price : 19.97
Bid-YTW : 3.57 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset -1.70 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.20
Bid-YTW : 5.30 %
ENB.PR.B FixedReset -1.67 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.10
Evaluated at bid price : 24.10
Bid-YTW : 3.89 %
ENB.PR.D FixedReset -1.62 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.78
Evaluated at bid price : 23.66
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
BAM.PR.X FixedReset -1.61 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.45
Evaluated at bid price : 21.45
Bid-YTW : 3.98 %
ENB.PR.J FixedReset -1.60 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.08
Evaluated at bid price : 24.60
Bid-YTW : 4.02 %
ENB.PF.E FixedReset -1.47 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.07
Evaluated at bid price : 24.82
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
ENB.PF.A FixedReset -1.39 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.11
Evaluated at bid price : 24.86
Bid-YTW : 4.05 %
ENB.PR.N FixedReset -1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.03
Evaluated at bid price : 24.41
Bid-YTW : 4.04 %
ENB.PR.T FixedReset -1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.78
Evaluated at bid price : 23.92
Bid-YTW : 4.01 %
ENB.PR.P FixedReset -1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.80
Evaluated at bid price : 23.92
Bid-YTW : 4.01 %
BAM.PF.B FixedReset -1.19 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.20
Evaluated at bid price : 24.96
Bid-YTW : 3.99 %
TRP.PR.B FixedReset -1.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 17.75
Evaluated at bid price : 17.75
Bid-YTW : 3.77 %
BAM.PF.A FixedReset -1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.55
Bid-YTW : 4.13 %
ENB.PF.G FixedReset -1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.09
Evaluated at bid price : 24.92
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount 1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 24.04
Evaluated at bid price : 24.45
Bid-YTW : 4.86 %
IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 1.24 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.75
Bid-YTW : 5.23 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
ENB.PR.P FixedReset 521,700 Desjardins sold 18,500 to Scotia at 24.10, then blocks of 125,500 shares, 241,000 shares, 15,600 and 16,000 to anonymous, all at 24.00, and finally crossed 65,200 at 24.00. Nice tickets!
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.80
Evaluated at bid price : 23.92
Bid-YTW : 4.01 %
ENB.PF.C FixedReset 199,713 Desjardins sold blocks of 111,200 and 55,200 to anonymous at 25.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.13
Evaluated at bid price : 24.96
Bid-YTW : 4.01 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 157,332 TD crossed 14,300 at 21.40 and 20,000 at 21.35. RBC crossed 37,300 at 21.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.39
Evaluated at bid price : 21.39
Bid-YTW : 3.85 %
MFC.PR.N FixedReset 120,750 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.06
Bid-YTW : 3.73 %
ENB.PF.E FixedReset 67,617 National crossed 26,000 at 25.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.07
Evaluated at bid price : 24.82
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
ENB.PF.G FixedReset 37,700 RBC bought 11,500 from anonymous at 25.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.09
Evaluated at bid price : 24.92
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
There were 29 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PVS.PR.C SplitShare Quote: 25.90 – 26.90
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.5898

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-12-10
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.90
Bid-YTW : 3.16 %

BAM.PF.E FixedReset Quote: 25.25 – 26.25
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.5928

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.22
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 3.93 %

HSE.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 19.61 – 20.36
Spot Rate : 0.7500
Average : 0.4868

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 19.61
Evaluated at bid price : 19.61
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %

PWF.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 21.50 – 22.19
Spot Rate : 0.6900
Average : 0.4603

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.50
Evaluated at bid price : 21.50
Bid-YTW : 3.58 %

ENB.PR.Y FixedReset Quote: 22.75 – 23.10
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2344

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.14
Evaluated at bid price : 22.75
Bid-YTW : 4.17 %

BAM.PR.T FixedReset Quote: 25.02 – 25.49
Spot Rate : 0.4700
Average : 0.3566

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.52
Evaluated at bid price : 25.02
Bid-YTW : 3.73 %

Rating Agencies Unhappy With Enbridge

Thursday, December 4th, 2014

Enbridge announced some very shareholder-friendly moves yesterday:

  • 33% dividend increase, payable March 1, 2015
  • Plans to transfer Canadian Liquids Pipelines business to Enbridge Income Fund
  • New dividend payout policy range of 75% to 85% of adjusted earnings
  • 2015 Adjusted EPS guidance of $2.05 to $2.35
  • Parallel U.S. restructuring plan under consideration


These actions are intended to enhance the value to investors of the Company’s record organic growth capital program and enhance the competitiveness of its funding costs for new organic growth opportunities and asset acquisitions.

The Canadian restructuring plan has been approved in principle by Enbridge’s Board of Directors but remains subject to finalization of preliminary internal reorganization steps and a number of internal and external consents and approvals, including final approval of definitive transfer terms by the Enbridge Board and by the Boards of Holdings and the Fund following a recommendation by an independent committee of the Fund and Holdings, and the receipt of all necessary shareholder and regulatory approvals that may be required.

Enbridge also has under review a potential parallel U.S. restructuring plan which would involve transfer of its directly held U.S. Liquids Pipelines assets to its U.S. affiliate, Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (EEP). This review has not yet progressed to a conclusion.

Commenting on today’s announcement, Al Monaco, President and Chief Executive Officer, Enbridge Inc., noted the following:

“The 33% increase in our dividend that we announced today and 14% to 16% expected annual average dividend growth rate through 2018 reflects Management’s confidence in the strength and embedded cash flow growth from the existing assets and the capital projects that will be put into service over the next four years. The change in our dividend policy range to 75 – 85% of adjusted earnings is supported by the excellent progress we’ve made on our enterprise-wide funding program, raising some $16 billion in debt and equity capital over the last two years; the expected increase in free cash flow through 2018; and reliable access to effective sources of equity funding including from our sponsored vehicles.

Today, shareholders indicated they are in favour of shareholder friendliness:

Enbridge Inc. (ENB) surged the most in 27 years after Canada’s largest pipeline operator boosted its dividend and said it plans to shift assets to an affiliate.

The shares climbed 10 percent in Toronto, the biggest gain since October 1987. The stock has increased 29 percent this year.

Enbridge said yesterday it plans to move C$17 billion ($15 billion) worth of Canadian liquids pipelines to the Enbridge Income Fund to help pay for capital investment. The company also boosted its dividend 33 percent and said earnings per share next year will be C$2.05 to C$2.35.

The so-called dropdown allows Enbridge “to accelerate dividend growth immediately and for the next 4+ years,” Matthew Akman, a Toronto-based analyst for ScotiaBank, wrote in a note today.

The boost in dividend comes as oil producers are cutting their payouts. Canadian Oil Sands Ltd. yesterday said it would reduce its quarterly dividend by 42 percent to 20 cents a share in late January. Enbridge ships crude from Canadian producers through its network of pipelines across North America.

Assiduous Readers will have no problem with the following pop quiz: “Shareholder-friendly actions are creditor _______________” (for the answer, see the bottom of this post).

Moody’s affirmed the rating but changed the outlook to negative:

Moody’s Investors Service has affirmed its ratings on Enbridge Inc (ENB), Enbridge Energy Partners L.P. (EEP), Enbridge Income Fund (EIF) and Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership (EELP) and Enbridge (U.S.) Inc. At the same time, Moody’s changed the outlooks on ENB, EEP, and EELP to negative. The outlook on EIF has been changed to developing. This follows Enbridge’s news release dated December 3 announcing a material financial restructuring and significant dividend increase. For a complete list of Moody’s ratings actions see the end of this press release.

“The negative outlook reflects the uncertainty surrounding the announced financial restructuring plans and the prospects for increased structural subordination at ENB, the company’s weak consolidated financial metrics and the reduction in financial flexibility associated with the proposed increase in dividends.” said Gavin MacFarlane, Vice President/Senior Analyst.

The company’s financial restructuring plans represent a substantial change in the company’s structure, with approximately C$17 billion in assets to be transferred to EIF from ENB. This compares to current total assets at ENB of C$67 billion and EIF of C$2.7 billion at 30 September 2014. One of the entities being transferred, Enbridge Pipelines (Athabasca) Inc. has no external debt, highlighting the increased structural subordination that will result at ENB going forward. The Canadian liquids pipeline business currently with assets of $16 billion and an associated capital program of $15 billion dominates the proposed transfer. Management has also indicated that it is contemplating a potential parallel U.S. restructuring plan that would transfer all of ENB’s US liquids assets to EEP.

Consolidated FFO/debt of 10.2% on an LTM basis remains weak and is slightly above the 10% adjusted FFO/debt level we have associated with a potential downgrade. The proposed increase in the dividend payout ratio from a range of 60-70% to 75-85% weakens the company’s financial flexibility as it moves forward with its current consolidated capital program of about $44 billion over the period 2014-2018. The increase is slightly mitigated by being tied to the execution of the capital program and any associated moderation in spend. On a consolidated basis, the business risk profile of ENB is unchanged.

We will look to resolve the outlooks when there is greater certainty and clarity surrounding the proposed restructuring in 2015.

It was only two weeks ago that I reported that S&P changed the outlook on ENB to Negative. Now the other shoe has dropped:

  • •We are placing our ratings on Calgary, Alta.-based Enbridge Inc. and Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Toronto-based Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc., and Houston-based Enbridge Energy Partners L.P. on CreditWatch with negative implications.
  • •The CreditWatch placements follows the announcement of dropdown of assets from parent Enbridge to Enbridge Income Fund (EIF), as well as a change to the company’s dividend policy.
  • •We believe that there is a potential for financial metrics to weaken further due to the additional dividend expense.
  • •In addition, the dropdown into EIF could raise the issue of subordination of debt at the Enbridge level.


The CreditWatch placements reflect our assessment of the existing weak forecast financial metrics at parent Enbridge, combined with the announced change in dividend policy and the dropdown of assets to subsidiary Enbridge Income Fund (EIF). Enbridge intends to increase its dividend payout ratio to 75%-85% of adjusted net income, from 60%-70%, effective March 2015. In addition, the dropdown plan covers US$17 billion of assets, comprising the Canadian liquids pipeline and renewable energy portfolio.

“We believe that there is a potential for financial metrics to weaken further due to the additional dividend expense, depending on the ultimate financing strategy,” said Standard & Poor’s credit analyst Gerry Hannochko. “As well, the dropdown to EIF could raise the issue of subordination of debt at the Enbridge level,” Mr. Hannochko added.

In addition, the company is contemplating transferring Enbridge’s U.S.-based liquids pipeline assets to subsidiary EEP.

On Nov. 21, 2014, we revised the outlook on the Enbridge group to negative based on weak forecast financials that we assess to be below the threshold for the “significant” financial risk profile category.

Compared with this, DBRS has been quite restrained:

DBRS Limited (DBRS) has today placed all ratings of Enbridge Inc. (ENB), Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (EPI) and Enbridge Income Fund (EIF or the Fund) as follows Under Review with Developing Implications:

The current rating actions reflect uncertainty associated with the ongoing corporate developments, percentage take-up of the debt exchange and the future funding strategy among the entities within ENB’s organization. For clarity, DBRS does not rule out potential future rating changes for any of the entities placed Under Review today and will provide updates as more information becomes available

From a financial risk perspective, DBRS expects a mix of factors to affect ENB’s future ratings. Firstly, a material increase in dividend payout combined with the proposed Transaction would mean that ENB would have to rely more on external funds to finance its portion of capex which, while substantial over the 2014 to 2018 period, would be reduced on a direct-to-ENB basis. Secondly, direct external debt at ENB would be reduced by the proposed debt exchange, although the sizable preferred shares outstanding at ENB would remain unchanged and would continue to weigh on ENB’s credit metrics. Finally, since all assets of EPI and EPA would be transferred to the Fund, holders of ENB’s direct external debt would be further away from the cash flow of the Transferred Assets than is currently the case. Dividend distributions from the Transferred Assets would have to be used to support debt service at the Fund before dividends could then be distributed to ENB. At this time, there are uncertainties with respect to the debt exchange details and the future financing needs at the ENB level as well as the amount of dividends to be received at ENB. Consequently, while DBRS believes that Under Review with Developing Implications is the appropriate rating action at this time, DBRS does not rule out a negative rating action in the future based on further analysis.

Enbridge Inc. is the issuer of (deep breath) ENB.PR.A (Straight Perpetual), ENB.PR.B, ENB.PR.D, ENB.PR.F, ENB.PR.H, ENB.PR.J, ENB.PR.N, ENB.PR.P, ENB.PR.T, ENB.PR.Y, ENB.PF.A, ENB.PF.C, ENB.PF.E and ENB.PF.G (FixedResets) and ENB.PR.U, ENB.PR.V, ENB.PF.U and ENB.PF.V (US-Pay FixedResets).

All told, I believe that total issuance comprises roughly 10% of the Canadian preferred share market, virtually all of which has come out since the issue of ENB.PR.B just over three years ago. A downgrade to junk would certainly make the market a bit more interesting for a while!

Answer to Pop-Quiz : ʎlpuǝᴉɹɟun ɹoʇᴉpǝɹɔ ǝɹɐ suoᴉʇɔɐ ʎlpuǝᴉɹɟ-ɹǝploɥǝɹɐɥS

December 3, 2014

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2014

The BoC announced its rate decision:

The Bank of Canada today announced that it is maintaining its target for the overnight rate at 1 per cent. The Bank Rate is correspondingly 1 1/4 per cent and the deposit rate is 3/4 per cent.

Inflation has risen by more than expected. The increase in inflation over the past year is largely due to the temporary effects of a lower Canadian dollar and some sector-specific factors, notably telecommunications and meat prices. Underlying inflation has edged up but remains below 2 per cent.

The U.S. economy has clearly strengthened, particularly business investment, which has benefitted Canada’s exports. Growth in the rest of the world, in contrast, continues to disappoint, leading authorities in some regions to deploy further policy stimulus. Oil prices have continued to fall, due to both supply and demand developments. In this context, global financial conditions have eased further.

Canada’s economy is showing signs of a broadening recovery. Stronger exports are beginning to be reflected in increased business investment and employment. This suggests that the hoped-for sequence of rebuilding that will lead to balanced and self-sustaining growth may finally have begun. However, the lower profile for oil and certain other commodity prices will weigh on the Canadian economy.

The net effect of these recent developments, together with upward revisions to historical data, is that the output gap appears to be smaller than the Bank had projected in the October Monetary Policy Report (MPR). However, the labour market continues to indicate significant slack in the economy.

While inflation is at a higher starting point relative to the October MPR, weaker oil prices pose an important downside risk to the inflation profile. This is tempered by a stronger U.S. economy, Canadian dollar depreciation, and recent federal fiscal measures. Household imbalances, meanwhile, present a significant risk to financial stability. Overall, the balance of risks remains within the zone for which the current stance of monetary policy is appropriate and therefore the target for the overnight rate remains at 1 per cent.

One pundit thinks the bank is preparing for a rate hike in 2015:

RBC Dominion Securities economist Mark Chandler said fading economic slack is “an important part of laying the groundwork for higher rates in 2015.”

… and household debt is increasing:

The central bank has oft cited this threat as household debt burdens rose to record levels. Its latest red flag went up on the same day as two reports underscored the swollen debts among Canadians just as the holiday shopping frenzy begins.

In one report, Equifax Canada said that “Canadian consumers have yet again tipped the scales setting a new benchmark of over $1.513-trillion in debt.”

That third-quarter figure marked an increase from $1.448-trillion in the second quarter and $1.409-trillion a year earlier, according to Equifax, whose numbers are based on more than 25 million unique consumer files.

Excluding mortgages, average debt held by Canadians has increased 2.7 per cent to $20,891.

There is a bright spot, however, in that delinquency rates declined.

Co-operators General Insurance Company, proud issuer of CCS.PR.C was confirmed at Pfd-3(high) by DBRS:

The Co-operators Group, by tradition, has strong presence in rural markets and obtains excellent brand recognition. The property and casualty operations rank in the top six by premiums in Canada. The Group is making efforts to achieve client growth in Québec and is utilizing direct response marketing in Ontario and Alberta. The Group maintains conservative regulatory capital ratios, which supports the rating given the capital raising constraints of a cooperative.

The general insurance business has had difficulty keeping combined ratios at acceptable levels for the rating. The Company is looking at better segmentation to improve results and has been investing in technology and process improvement to achieve a better customer experience. Financial leverage is at reasonable level and supportive of the rating.

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, proud issuer of FFH.PR.C, FFH.PR.E, FFH.PR.G, FFH.PR.I and FFH.PR.K, was confirmed at Pfd-3 by DBRS:

Over the long term, Fairfax has generally achieved strong investment results on the investment portfolios it manages for its insurance subsidiaries. With willingness to take advantage of market disruptions and distressed valuations for particular securities and purchase hedges against general market downturns versus the actual portfolio investments, the active investment management generates volatile financial results.

Financial leverage (preferred shares and debt-to-total capital), although declining from September 2013, remains at the upper range for the rating in the mid-thirties. Fixed charge coverage ratios have been very low for the last few years, with low profitability, but the year-to-date (September 2014) results have yielded a desirable ratio. The Company maintains a minimum balance of $1 billion in cash and marketable securities at the holding company for liquidity and contingent subsidiary capital needs, which is viewed as prudent given the earnings volatility.

The Company’s management culture places a high reliance on local management to manage their businesses prudently. The decentralized structure has allowed Fairfax to grow by acquisition globally to take advantage of profitable niches held by existing businesses. DBRS realizes this decentralized management structure contrasts sharply with most Canadian financial institutions, but notes that, if done correctly and with the right businesses and people, it can be a successful strategy, which the Company has been able to demonstrate.

HSBC Bank Canada, proud issuer of HSB.PR.C and HSB.PR.D, has been confirmed at Pfd-2 by DBRS (for NVCC non-compliant shares):

With Canada being a priority market for the HSBC Group, HSBC Bank Canada benefits from the strength of the Parent and the international capabilities and relationships of one of the largest banking groups in the world. HSBC has good intrinsic strengths, including its low cost-to-income ratio and superior customer service model, somewhat offset by geographic and industry concentrations, its historically higher interest-rate risk tolerance and scale challenges in its retail banking and wealth management businesses.

The Bank continues to execute on its strategy of growing its Commercial Banking and its Global Banking and Markets segments. At the same time, HSBC has made strides to increase presence with credit cards, mortgages and wealth products, particularly with its globally affluent customers. Earnings have continued to be good, with ROE in the mid-teens and risk metrics strong, although somewhat lumpy due to the proportions of commercial and wholesale lending.

Notable business changes over the past couple of years are largely complete, allowing the Bank to concentrate on its strategy, although implementing HSBC Group-wide improvements in compliance and risk controls may continue to occupy management attention. The run-off of the consumer finance portfolio is proceeding as planned, as is the repositioning of business banking towards clients with multi-product opportunities and lower compliance risk.

It was a poor day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts losing 20bp, FixedResets off 8bp and DeemedRetractibles down 11bp. Volatility was minor, but exciting anyway. Volume was slightly below average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2134 % 2,517.4
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2134 % 3,985.6
Floater 2.99 % 3.11 % 63,840 19.39 4 -0.2134 % 2,676.2
OpRet 4.39 % -12.05 % 27,216 0.08 2 0.0782 % 2,760.6
SplitShare 4.27 % 3.63 % 43,605 3.75 5 0.1347 % 3,195.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0782 % 2,524.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.42 % -2.85 % 75,995 0.09 20 0.1387 % 2,485.9
Perpetual-Discount 5.14 % 5.03 % 116,328 15.40 15 -0.2037 % 2,668.6
FixedReset 4.17 % 3.57 % 193,501 8.63 74 -0.0849 % 2,577.4
Deemed-Retractible 4.97 % -0.75 % 98,012 0.16 40 -0.1128 % 2,613.5
FloatingReset 2.54 % 1.89 % 60,591 3.49 5 -0.1097 % 2,548.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
HSE.PR.A FixedReset -5.09 % This is a real drop, since several trades were executed below 20.50, but the volume around these levels (about 1,600 shares, late in the day) was low relative to the day’s trading of 19,629 shares. The VWAP was $20.99. The weakness is probably related to yesterday’s new issue announcement.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 20.50
Evaluated at bid price : 20.50
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %
BAM.PF.D Perpetual-Discount -1.46 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 21.90
Evaluated at bid price : 22.23
Bid-YTW : 5.60 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
MFC.PR.N FixedReset 707,152 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.07
Bid-YTW : 3.72 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 281,206 Scotia crossed 177,100 at 21.27. Will reset at 3.266% December 31.YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 21.33
Evaluated at bid price : 21.33
Bid-YTW : 3.86 %
ENB.PR.P FixedReset 71,210 RBC crossed 50,000 at 24.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 22.93
Evaluated at bid price : 24.23
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
ENB.PF.C FixedReset 62,053 RBC crossed 50,000 at 25.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 23.21
Evaluated at bid price : 25.20
Bid-YTW : 3.96 %
FTS.PR.M FixedReset 60,325 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 25.65.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-12-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.57
Bid-YTW : 3.62 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 57,062 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 20.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 20.35
Evaluated at bid price : 20.35
Bid-YTW : 3.50 %
There were 27 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
SLF.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 20.55 – 20.90
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2382

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.55
Bid-YTW : 5.10 %

MFC.PR.H FixedReset Quote: 26.00 – 26.45
Spot Rate : 0.4500
Average : 0.3496

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.00
Bid-YTW : 2.71 %

BAM.PR.T FixedReset Quote: 25.26 – 25.59
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2323

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 23.60
Evaluated at bid price : 25.26
Bid-YTW : 3.68 %

FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.20 – 24.55
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2582

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 23.81
Evaluated at bid price : 24.20
Bid-YTW : 4.92 %

SLF.PR.D Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.96 – 23.24
Spot Rate : 0.2800
Average : 0.1897

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.96
Bid-YTW : 5.49 %

IFC.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 24.34 – 24.65
Spot Rate : 0.3100
Average : 0.2234

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.34
Bid-YTW : 3.90 %