Japan is rumoured to be considering a capital surcharge on systemically important banks, but details and confirmations are scarce:
Japan’s financial regulator is considering forcing the country’s largest banks to hold more capital than required under Basel III rules, a person with direct knowledge of the matter said.
The Financial Services Agency will start internal discussions soon on whether to apply a capital surcharge to systemically important lenders such as Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., the person said, declining to be identified because the matter is confidential.
…
The Swiss panel said UBS AG and Credit Suisse should hold almost double the capital required under the Basel III proposals announced last month. By 2019, the lenders would need to hold at least 10 percent of capital in common equity, compared with 7 percent required under Basel.The possibility of a global capital surcharge of around 2 percent for the world’s most important banks “cannot be ruled out,” Shinichi Ina, a Tokyo-based analyst at Credit Suisse, wrote in a report this week.
This is regulation in a nut’s hell. I support a progressive surcharge on Risk Weighted Assets. I am quite aware that RWA is, at best, an imperfect measure of a bank’s systemic importance; but I assert that singling out a group of “Top Tier” banks is worse.
Ireland got an unwelcome jolt Wednesday as Fitch Ratings cut its sovereign credit rating to the lowest level of any of the major agencies, citing the heavy burden of bailing out the country’s banking sector.
Fitch cut Ireland’s long-term foreign- and local-currency ratings to A+ from AA-. Moody’s Investors Service, which warned Tuesday that it was reviewing the country for a possible downgrade, and Standard & Poor’s both rate Irish debt higher.
The move “reflects the exceptional and greater-than-expected fiscal cost associated with the government’s recapitalization of the Irish banks, especially Anglo Irish Bank,” Chris Pryce, Fitch’s director of sovereign ratings said in a statement.
The Bank of Canada has released a Working Paper by James Chapman, Jonathan Chiu, and Miguel Molico titled Central Bank Haircut Policy:
We present a model of central bank collateralized lending to study the optimal choice of the haircut policy. We show that a lending facility provides a bundle of two types of insurance: insurance against liquidity risk as well as insurance against downside risk of the collateral. Setting a haircut therefore involves balancing the trade-off between relaxing the liquidity constraints of agents on one hand, and increasing potential inflation risk and distorting the portfolio choices of agents on the other. We argue that the optimal haircut is higher when the central bank is unable to lend exclusively to agents who actually need liquidity. Finally, for an unexpected drop in the haircut, the central bank can be more aggressive than when setting a permanent level of the haircut.
The TMX has a new page showing Bond Market Data. The data from today (labelled July 19, 2010), showing $20.04-billion face nominal Canadas being traded vs. $0.01-billion face RRBs, should illustrate the points I have made at various time regarding the relative liquidity of the latter! I presume – but do not know – that they get their trading statistics from the same data set used for their prices, which are major Canadian dealers.
The Canadian preferred share market showed continued strength on continued high volume, with PerpetualDiscounts gaining 17bp and FixedResets up 10bp.
PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.47%, equivalent to 7.66% interest at the standard conversion factor of 1.4x. Long corporates now yield 5.2% so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (also called the Seniority Spread) now stands at about 245bp, a sharp decline from the 260bp reported on September 30.
HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices Values are provisional and are finalized monthly |
|||||||
Index | Mean Current Yield (at bid) |
Median YTW |
Median Average Trading Value |
Median Mod Dur (YTW) |
Issues | Day’s Perf. | Index Value |
Ratchet | 0.00 % | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.1102 % | 2,163.9 |
FixedFloater | 0.00 % | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.1102 % | 3,278.1 |
Floater | 2.89 % | 3.24 % | 74,699 | 19.17 | 3 | 0.1102 % | 2,336.5 |
OpRet | 4.91 % | 3.10 % | 76,913 | 0.15 | 9 | 0.0457 % | 2,370.4 |
SplitShare | 5.91 % | -31.75 % | 66,246 | 0.09 | 2 | 0.1836 % | 2,383.6 |
Interest-Bearing | 0.00 % | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.0457 % | 2,167.5 |
Perpetual-Premium | 5.74 % | 5.30 % | 125,143 | 4.86 | 19 | 0.0921 % | 1,999.8 |
Perpetual-Discount | 5.46 % | 5.47 % | 223,552 | 14.68 | 58 | 0.1676 % | 1,995.5 |
FixedReset | 5.29 % | 3.20 % | 321,372 | 3.30 | 47 | 0.1029 % | 2,262.6 |
Performance Highlights | |||
Issue | Index | Change | Notes |
ELF.PR.G | Perpetual-Discount | -1.59 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2040-10-06 Maturity Price : 19.85 Evaluated at bid price : 19.85 Bid-YTW : 6.01 % |
GWO.PR.L | Perpetual-Discount | -1.05 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2040-10-06 Maturity Price : 24.30 Evaluated at bid price : 24.51 Bid-YTW : 5.80 % |
TRP.PR.C | FixedReset | 1.06 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2040-10-06 Maturity Price : 25.63 Evaluated at bid price : 25.68 Bid-YTW : 3.60 % |
MFC.PR.E | FixedReset | 1.32 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Call Maturity Date : 2014-10-19 Maturity Price : 25.00 Evaluated at bid price : 26.93 Bid-YTW : 3.60 % |
HSB.PR.D | Perpetual-Discount | 1.34 % | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2040-10-06 Maturity Price : 23.29 Evaluated at bid price : 23.52 Bid-YTW : 5.34 % |
Volume Highlights | |||
Issue | Index | Shares Traded |
Notes |
SLF.PR.C | Perpetual-Discount | 120,790 | RBC crossed 89,100 at 20.25. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2040-10-06 Maturity Price : 20.27 Evaluated at bid price : 20.27 Bid-YTW : 5.53 % |
BNS.PR.T | FixedReset | 95,566 | RBC crossed blocks of 50,000 and 10,000, both at 27.55. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Call Maturity Date : 2014-05-25 Maturity Price : 25.00 Evaluated at bid price : 27.55 Bid-YTW : 3.16 % |
BAM.PR.B | Floater | 91,262 | Nesbitt crossed 88,000 at 16.35. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2040-10-06 Maturity Price : 16.30 Evaluated at bid price : 16.30 Bid-YTW : 3.24 % |
RY.PR.I | FixedReset | 59,453 | RBC crossed 49,900 at 26.66. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Call Maturity Date : 2014-03-26 Maturity Price : 25.00 Evaluated at bid price : 26.60 Bid-YTW : 3.15 % |
IAG.PR.F | Perpetual-Discount | 46,291 | Desjardins crossed 30,000 at 25.00. YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Option Certainty Maturity Date : 2040-10-06 Maturity Price : 25.00 Evaluated at bid price : 25.00 Bid-YTW : 5.95 % |
BNS.PR.M | Perpetual-Discount | 38,548 | YTW SCENARIO Maturity Type : Limit Maturity Maturity Date : 2040-10-06 Maturity Price : 21.45 Evaluated at bid price : 21.77 Bid-YTW : 5.16 % |
There were 54 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares. |
[…] PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.42%, equivalent to 7.59% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.4x. Long corporates now yield about 5.2%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread now stands at about 240bp, as slight (and perhaps meaningless) tightening from the 245bp reported on October 6. […]