Archive for the ‘Better Communication, Please!’ Category

BNA: Ticker Change to PVS

Friday, July 18th, 2014

The useless pack of morons in charge of Partners Value Split Corp. have announced:

That’s right – nothing. The dolts calling themselves directors are:

  • John P. Barratt
  • Brian D. Lawson
  • James L.R. Kelly
  • Frank N.C. Lochan *
  • Edward C. Kress *
  • Allen G. Taylor *

The twerps marked with an asterisk are also boneheaded officers of the corporation, joined by the lackadaisical Loretta M. Corso.

None of these idiots ensured that there was anything at all on the company website to indicate a change of ticker. My Lord, but these cretins are lucky that running a single-share Split Corp. doesn’t take any brains.

It was left to Stockwatch to publish the only internet mention I have found of today’s ticker change:

Partners Value Split Corp. has changed its trading symbol to PVS from BNA, according to the Toronto Stock Exchange. The exchange reports the company’s preferred shares will start trading under the new symbol at the open on Friday, July 18, 2014. There will be no change to the Cusip numbers. The company’s Series 1 preferred shares will trade under the symbol PVS.PR.A, its Series 3 preferred shares will trade under PVS.PR.B, its Series 5 preferred shares will trade under PVS.PR.C and its Series 6 preferred shares will trade under PVS.PR.D.

This allows us to construct the following table, which I have checked from data available from the Toronto Stock Exchange, once you know what to look for and pay:

Partners Value Split Corp.
Ticker Changes, 2014-7-19
Series Old
Ticker
New
Ticker
1 BNA.PR.B PVS.PR.A
3 BNA.PR.C PVS.PR.B
5 BNA.PR.E PVS.PR.C
6 BNA.PR.F PVS.PR.D

Update, 2014-7-21: They have issued a press release!

Toronto, July 21, 2014: Partners Value Split Corp. (the “Company”) announced today that the Company has changed the ticker symbol of its preferred shares trading on the TSX from BNA to PVS, effective Friday, July 18, 2014. The Company’s ticker symbol is now aligned with its corporate name.

The following table shows the former ticker symbol and new ticker symbol for each series of the Company’s outstanding preferred shares:

Preferred Share Former Ticker Symbol New Ticker Symbol
Series 1 BNA.PR.B PVS.PR.A
Series 3 BNA.PR.C PVS.PR.B
Series 5 BNA.PR.E PVS.PR.C
Series 6 BNA.PR.F PVS.PR.D

The Company owns a portfolio consisting of 53,160,644 Class A Limited Voting Shares of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (the “Brookfield Shares”) which is expected to yield quarterly dividends that are sufficient to fund quarterly fixed cumulative preferential dividends for the holders of the Company’s preferred shares and to enable the holders of the Company’s capital shares to participate in any capital appreciation of the Brookfield Shares. Brookfield Asset Management is a global alternative asset manager with over US$175 billion in assets under management. For more than 100 years, Brookfield has owned and operated assets on behalf of shareholders and clients with a focus on property, renewable energy, infrastructure and private equity. Brookfield has a range of public and private investment products and services which leverage its expertise and experience. The Brookfield Shares are co-listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BAM”, the TSX under the symbol “BAM.A” and the NYSE Euronext under the symbol “BAMA”.

* * * *

For further information, please contact: Allen G. Taylor, Chief Financial Officer, at (416) 359-7864

GMP.PR.B Next Ex-Dividend Date?

Thursday, February 28th, 2013

It’s rather difficult to get information about the GMP.PR.B dividends!

Their historical dividend information indicates that the last dividend was paid 2012-9-30, although I feel certain that the December payment proceeded smoothly; Information regarding 12Q4 is not available; and the TMX Money site reports an ex-date of 2012-12-6.

Come on, guys! I find this poor communication irritating enough in non-financial companies; it is not acceptable for a financial firm – particularly one rated Pfd-3(low) Trend Negative – to cultivate such an air of mystery.

SJR.PR.A 2nd Quarter Dividend

Tuesday, June 26th, 2012

Shaw Communications declared the 12Q2 dividend on SJR.PR.A with record date 2012-6-15.

So why does TMXMoney still report that the last ex-date was 2012-3-13?

LFE.PR.A Tight-Lipped Regarding Special Retraction Results

Wednesday, June 6th, 2012

It will be recalled that LFE.PR.A is undergoing a reorganization; a very important part of this reorganization was:

Shareholders who do not wish to remain invested in the Company under its reorganized share structure will have until the close of business on May 17, 2012 to provide the Company with notice through their CDS participant that they wish to have their Preferred Shares or Class A Shares redeemed pursuant to the 2012 Special Retraction Right, and to surrender their Shares for retraction. On such a special retraction, each holder of a Preferred Share will receive the lesser of (i) $10.00 and (ii) the net asset value per Unit calculated on May 31, 2012; while holder of a Class A Share will receive the net asset value per Unit calculated on May 31, 2012, less $10.00. Shareholders interested in exercising such retraction right should contact the CDS Participant through which they hold the Shares for further information and instructions as to how to exercise this right. Shareholders should note that the requirements of any particular CDS Participant may vary, and that Shareholders may need to inform their CDS Participant of any intention to exercise this retraction right in advance of the May 17 deadline. Payment for the Class A Shares or Preferred Shares so tendered for retraction pursuant to the 2012 Special Retraction Right will be made no later than June 19, 2012.

So – the company has known what the consolidation ratio was going to be for which issue (either the capital units or the preferreds) since … oh, call it the morning of May 18. In my innocence, I had assumed that the details of the consolidation would be made available on the NAV date of May 31 (or June 1, anyway!):

If more Class A Shares are tendered for retraction under the 2012 Special Retraction Right than Preferred Shares, the outstanding Preferred Shares will be consolidated so that following the retraction pursuant to the 2012 Special Retraction Right there would be an equal number of Preferred Shares and Class A Shares outstanding. Similarly, if more Preferred Shares are tendered for retraction than Class A Shares, the outstanding Class A shares will be consolidated so that again there would be an equal number of Preferred Shares and Class A Shares outstanding following implementation of the 2012 Special Retraction Right. The Company may implement this consolidation by adjusting the number of 2012 Preferred Shares, 2013 Warrants and 2014 Warrants to be issued to holders of Preferred Shares, in the event a consolidation of Preferred Shares is required.

No announcement has yet been made, so I inquired; the answer received was:

A news release will likely be disseminated close to the June 19th Special Retraction payment date.

Knowing the consolidation ratio is critical when evaluating credit quality of LFE.PR.A; it is also critical when evaluating the option value of LFE. But good old Quadravest is going to keep us in the dark; and I cannot even begin to fathom the purpose behind the delay.

All I can suggest is that according to the 2011 Financials, there were 10,712,753 units outstanding on 2011-11-30 and this number is reflected for each part of the unit on the TMX Money Website. Another possibility is to check SEDAR for filings that are only semi-publicized.

What a total waste of time.

BNA Dividends Still Not Declared

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

The recent infusion of riches doesn’t seem to have improved BAM Split’s ability to service its preferred shareholders to any great extent.

I have estimated that the ex-date of the current dividend should be tomorrow, August 20, but it has still not been declared.

The company has made something of a fetish of forgetting to declare dividends and at one point declared dividends on some, but not all, of their issues outstanding

I have sent an inquiry to the company at ir@brookfield.com. Readers may also wish to contact BAM Investments and ask why a company they control is so screwed up.

BAM Split Corp. has the following preferred issues outstanding: BNA.PR.B, BNA.PR.C & BNA.PR.D. All are tracked by HIMIPref™.

Update, 2009-8-20: The TSX is now reporting that the ex-Dividend date for the current distribution was yesterday, August 19.

Yesterday, of course, they were reporting only the last ex-Date, 2009-5-20.

Anybody who bought yesterday in expectation of receiving the current distribution has cause for complaint to the company – it won’t get you very far, mind you, but you can complain.

Update, 2009-08-21: I have received a communication from BNA claiming that the dividends were declared in May and included a dividend payable on BNA.PR.A, which has been redeemed.

I have responded seeking clarification regarding the dividend payable on the redeemed security, and asking why the TSX is reporting a declaration date of 8/18.

Bad Job, SunLife!

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

The last dividend paid on the SunLife preferreds (SLF.PR.A, SLF.PR.B, SLF.PR.C, SLF.PR.D & SLF.PR.E) had an ex-dividend date of November 17, 2008.

Therefore, it is reasonable to pencil in February 17, 2009 as the ex-dividend date for the current dividend. And therefore, I assert, it is reasonable to expect that the dividend will be declared by February 11, 2009, regardless of the actual details of record and payment date.

‘Nope!’ says SunLife. ‘Can’t be bothered!’

The current dividend has not yet been declared and there is nothing on SunLife’s Investor Relations page to indicate any kind of schedule.

SunLife releases their 4th Quarter Earnings tomorrow and I can only speculate that some Moronic Boomer Asshole has determined that it would be efficient to release dividend details at the same time.

There is no doubt in my mind regarding payment of the current dividend; I have guessed at:

  • Ex-Date 2/17
  • Record-Date 2/19
  • Pay-Day 3/31

but it’s only a guess.

Sunlife’s carelessness in leaving the declaration so late – with no indication of the dates that are anticipated – shows a contempt for its shareholders. Get with the programme, guys!

Update, 2009-2-12: SunLife has announced:

the following quarterly dividends on its Class A Non-Cumulative Preferred Shares payable on March 31, 2009 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 25, 2009: $0.296875 per Series 1 share; $0.30 per Series 2 share; $0.278125 per Series 3 share; $0.278125 per Series 4 share; and $0.28125 per Series 5 share.

STW.PR.A: Stealth Redemption Confirmed

Wednesday, December 10th, 2008

The essence of the redemption noted by Assiduous Reader erikd has been confirmed:

STW.PR.A has been called at $10.2 + accrued for total of $10.3173913 per share. 33.8575% of preferred shares have been called. This is a good premium to last friday’s trading price.

source is bloomberg, under news of the capital shares
I grabbed the screen at work. It will trade ex-redemption on Dec 9th, and supposed to get redeemed on Dec 12th.

I have confirmed with investor relations at Middlefield that the size is at least approximately correct; the redemption price per the prospectus is indeed 10.20.

The closing quote on Dec 8 – the last cum-redemption day, according to erikd, and the day he posted his note – was 9.11-18, on volume of 9227 shares. Yesterday was 8.64-87 on 5,294 shares. Today was 8.80-26, 13×2 on no volume.

I don’t know when the information was posted on Bloomberg, but if I had sold shares prior to the ex-redemption date and after the posting, I’d be pretty upset. According to me, a sizable redemption at a premium of more than 10% to market price counts as material information. Nothing was on their website, and investor relations could not confirm or deny immediately.

Their investor relations representative emphasized that they were not in breach of regulatory requirements. That may well be the case (it is not my place to judge) but I will suggest that:

  • The redemption was material information.
  • Bloomberg is a paid service; advising Bloomberge does not (or should not) constitute public disclosure
  • Therefore – whatever the strict legalities might be – I consider this a case of selective disclosure
  • If Middlefield did indeed follow minimum regulatory standards, that’s not good enough. They should have more consideration for their investors’ interests than that.
  • Let’s see a press release next time!

I will also be most interested to learn whether Middlefield purchased preferred according to the issuer bid. I will suggest that, given that STW.PR.A has not closed above 9.60 in at least a month, it would have been in the best interests of the fund to have exercised this right to the maximum extent possible.

I have noted a previous STW.PR.A stealth redemption.

STW.PR.A is tracked by HIMIPref™ and is part of the InterestBearing subindex. Given the low asset coverage ratio, it will probably be downgraded at some point in the near future at which point it will be relegated to “Scraps”. It is also possible that reduced liquidity due to the reduced float will be a prior cause for relegation.

CU Inc. Issues Long Term Debs

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

CU Inc. has an issue trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange, CIU.PR.A, now bid at 20.50 for a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.64% based on a limitMaturity; this is an interest-equivalent of 7.90% at a conversion factor of 1.4x. These are Series 1 Preferred. The company also has an approximately equal value of “Series Second Preferred” outstanding, all of which are held by the parent company.

Today they issued some 30-year debs at 5.58%.

Mainly I was interested in this because of the 232bp interest-equivalent spread between the prefs and the long debs, but there’s a little twist …

A grossly abbreviated statement of their liabilites is:

CIU Inc. Liabilities
Item Value
CAD Millions
Current Liabilities 250.6
Non-Current Non-Capital 229.6
Long-Term Debt 2,459.4
Series 1 Prefs 115.0
Series 2 Prefs 130.0
Equity 1,675.5
Total 4,860.1

According to the prospectus for CIU.PR.A:

In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, or other distribution of assets of the Corporation among its shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs, the holders of the Series 1 Preferred Shares shall be entitled to receive the amount paid up on such shares together with all accrued and unpaid cumulative preferential dividends thereon and, if such liquidation, dissolution, winding-up or distribution is voluntary, a premium of $1.00 per share if such event commences prior to June 1, 2009, and, if such event commences thereafter, a premium equivalent to the premium payable on redemption if such shares were to be redeemed at the date of commencement of any such voluntary liquidation, dissolution, winding-up or distribution, before any amount shall be paid or any property or assets of the Corporation shall be distributed to the holders of any Class A non-voting shares or Class B common shares or other shares ranking junior to the Series 1 Preferred Shares. After payment to the holders of the Series 1 Preferred Shares of the amounts so payable to them, they shall not be entitled to share in any further distribution of the property or assets of the Corporation.

… which is not entirely satisfactory, because nowhere in the document is the seniority of the “Series Second Preferred Shares” clearly defined relative to the “Series 1 Preferred Shares”.

I have used their contact form to ask the question:

Are the CU Inc. Series 1 Preferred Shares junior, senior, or parri passu to the Series Second Preferred Shares?

Where may I find legal documentation of the relative status?

Update, 2008-5-27: I have received a note from Atco staff denying the existence of Series Second Preferred shares. Further inquiries are in progress.

BNA.PR.A, BNA.PR.B, BNA.PR.C Dividends Declared

Friday, May 16th, 2008

I wouldn’t normally post on such a routine matter as dividend declarations, but having made an issue of the matter I will note that dividends for these issues have been declared.

ex-Date: 5/20
record-Date: 5/22
pay-Date: 6/7

BNA.PR.A BNA.PR.B & BNA.PR.C Dividends Not Yet Declared

Wednesday, May 14th, 2008

I’m not very happy with the Directors of BAM Split Corp..

The last dividend on their preferred shares went ex on February 20. They have not yet declared a current dividend, according to the Toronto Stock Exchange. This follows last year’s fiasco with the first BNA.PR.C dividend, an eMail sent on the weekend (not answered) and a voice mail message left today (not answered).

The company is sitting on client money of about $1.7-billion. This inattention to detail isn’t good enough, guys.