December 4, 2014

December 4th, 2014

Europe is inching towards quantitative easing:

Mario Draghi dragged the European Central Bank toward more monetary stimulus with a pledge to assess the need early next year, disappointing some investors seeking faster action.

Even as he unveiled “substantially” lower forecasts for euro-area inflation and economic growth, the ECB president said officials will wait to evaluate whether they’re doing enough to revive the weakest consumer-price growth in five years. They are already intensifying preparations for further measures, including studying the merits of buying government debt.

If policy makers do see a need to combat a prolonged period of low inflation then “this would imply altering early next year the size, pace and composition of our measures,” Draghi told reporters in Frankfurt after his Governing Council met to set policy for the last time in 2014. “We don’t need unanimity” on the 24-member council to act, he said.

The ECB Governing Council expects to consider a proposal for a broad-based asset program including sovereign debt next month, according to two euro-area central-bank officials familiar with deliberations who asked not to be identified because the discussion is private. The package is envisaged to include various types of bonds, but no equities, and has yet to be designed, the people said.

Canadian equities got hammered:

Canadian stocks fell the most in more than a year as the nation’s biggest banks posted results that missed estimates and energy shares resumed a selloff with the price of crude.

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD), the country’s largest lender by assets, tumbled the most in more than five years after posting fourth-quarter profit short of estimates. Energy stocks tumbled 2.1 percent as a group as oil fell. Canadian Oil Sands Ltd. (COS) sank 16 percent to a decade low after slashing its dividend. Enbridge Inc. jumped 10 percent to a record on plans to transfer C$17 billion ($14.9 billion) in assets to a fund.

The Standard & Poor’s/TSX Composite Index (SPTSX) slumped 284.11 points, or 1.9 percent, to 14,469.95 at 4 p.m. in Toronto, the biggest drop since June 2013. The equities benchmark pared its gain to 6.2 percent this year.

All of the 10 industries in the S&P/TSX dropped at least 0.6 percent on trading volume 45 percent higher than the 30-day average today. Global equities slumped after the European Central Bank said policy makers will reassess stimulus next quarter, damping hopes for additional bond purchases this year.

And whenever there’s a big market move there’s only one party at fault:

A nearly 1 per cent drop in the S&P/TSX composite index in the final hour of trading Thursday was due to a large order from Goldman Sachs to sell a basket of Canadian stocks, according to a note from the Bank of Montreal.

Canada’s main stock index recorded one of its biggest declines of the year on Thursday, as investors reacted to another push lower in the price of crude oil as well as a disappointing earnings report from Toronto-Dominion Bank.

According to BMO, the Goldman Sachs sell order was for approximately $600-million in a broad selection of Canadian stocks, but many were in the banking and energy sectors. The heaviest volumes sold by Goldman were shares in Royal Bank of Canada, TD Bank, Bank of Nova Scotia, Bank of Montreal, Canadian Natural Resources, Enbridge and Suncor.

The TSX closed down 284.1 points, or 1.93 per cent, at 14,469.95, far outpacing the 0.12 per cent fall in the S&P 500. The Canadian index had been down nearly 1 per cent prior to 3 p.m. (ET), which is around when the Goldman order was believed to be transacted.

The feds are shilling for the Toronto Exchange:

The Canadian government has approved Burger King Worldwide Inc.’s purchase of Tim Hortons Inc. on condition it maintains employment levels and list the company in Toronto.

To win approval under the nation’s foreign takeover law, Burger King has agreed to “work with Tim Hortons (THI) franchisees” to maintain employment levels across Canada, and accelerate expansion of new restaurants outside Canada at a “significantly greater pace than currently planned,” Industry Minister James Moore said in a statement.

Burger King has also agreed to establish the new company’s headquarters in Oakville, Ontario and list on the Toronto Stock Exchange, according to the statement. Other commitments include managing Tim Hortons as a “distinct brand” that won’t be co-branded with Burger King and the maintenance of franchise rent and royalty structure at current levels for the next five years.

Yay! Micromanagement and central planning! Soon we’ll all be RICH!

Bond salesmen won’t be rich, though (emphasis added):

Four of Canada’s six biggest banks have posted quarterly declines in trading, dragged down by plunging bond markets in October and one-time changes to how lenders value uncollaterized derivatives.

Toronto-Dominion Bank’s trading revenue dropped 14 percent to C$296 million ($260 million) in the period ended Oct. 31 from a year earlier, led by declines in interest-rate and credit trading, the company said today. The lender recorded a C$65 million pretax charge in its wholesale bank tied to the valuation adjustment.

Bank of Montreal (BMO) trading revenue tumbled 21 percent to C$186 million as fixed-income trading plunged 79 percent from a year earlier, the bank said in a Dec. 2 statement. The valuation adjustment reduced revenue by C$39 million.

CIBC trading revenue fell 81 percent to C$27 million, with a C$98 million loss in interest-rates trading, the Toronto-based bank said today in a statement. The lender said it recorded an C$82 million after-tax charge tied to funding valuation adjustments.

Trimming Capital

Royal Bank’s total trading revenue slid 43 percent to C$371 million, fueled by a 70 percent drop in trading of interest-rate and credit securities, the Toronto-based bank said yesterday. Royal Bank had a C$51 million after-tax charge tied to the adjustments.

Royal Bank has been trimming the capital devoted to bond trading as global regulations meant to prevent another credit crisis make it one of the lender’s most costly businesses, CFO Janice Fukakusa said.

So bond market liquidity just got a little worse. Just in time for the long-awaited crash due to policy rate changes!

I try to restrain myself from ranting on non-preferred share issues on this soap-box, but every now and then something irritates me enough that I think it would be a shame to deprive you of my views. Today’s rant is about a Bloomberg story titled Princeton Has a Shadow Fraternity System Nobody Controls. So in the first place, the headline is nonsense. The ‘shadow fraternity system’ certainly is under control by somebody, how could it be otherwise? The writer is merely upset that it’s not controlled by people of whom he approves.

When Princeton officials learned that a student had mass-emailed a photo of a woman performing oral sex at one of its 11 eating clubs (social clubs that resemble fraternities), it quietly began investigating the matter. Despite the fact that passing around a photo of a sex act without the consent of those pictured is a crime in New Jersey, the university did not inform local police. The school’s squeamish approach to the incident raises questions about how it can discipline its students — and abide by stricter government guidelines for handling sexual assault — when so much of social life at the institution lives outside the walls of campus.

“Our investigation began as soon as we received a report, just days after the alleged incident,” says Martin Mbugua, a University spokesman. The Princeton Police Department only found out about the email three weeks later, when an anonymous third party notified the police chief. Any misbehavior at the Tiger Inn, headquartered in a stately mansion on a street just off the main campus, technically falls under the jurisdiction of local police.

In November, the Department of Education found that Princeton botched its response to reports of sexual assault and the University formally agreed to tighten its handling of alleged sexual crimes. New guidelines implemented by the government require schools to investigate sexual violence reports that occur outside of school grounds if the incident has “continuing effects on campus.”

So the university is on the defensive about not being an official informer, and are expected to be Junior Policemen with respect to sexual violence. Sorry, buddies: these are university students we are talking about here – young men and young women. If they want something to be a police matter, they should be expected to know how to contact the police themselves. Junior Police and a Junior Justice System with the power to expel students are not the answer to anything. But meanwhile, the politicians bleat that 20-year olds are old enough to die in Afghanistan, but not old enough to take responsibility for themselves, and drip crocodile tears over the rising cost of tuition due to administrative overload.

There was one cry on the lips of FixedReset investors today:

clobberinTime

One thing I can’t help but highlighting, given the horrible (second-worst) performance of TRP.PR.C today, is the Implied Volatility analysis for the TRP FixedResets:

impVol_TRP_141204
Click for Big

Assiduous Readers will recognize that the overall appearance of the graph has not changed from the chart published as of the close on December 2, but Alert Assiduous Readers will notice that the fit to theory is much better. On Tuesday I asserted that:

Prices for the TRP issues are very strange: consider that TRP.PR.A, bid at 21.15, is priced lower than TRP.PR.C, which is a FixedReset, 4.40%+154, resetting 2016-1-30, bid at 21.77. … TRP.PR.A is now $1.44 cheap while TRP.PR.C is $1.73 expensive

Well, that was then. Now I say that TRP.PR.A is bid at 21.39 and is $0.89 cheap, while TRP.PR.C is bid at 20.82 and is $1.06 expensive. So according to me, there’s more adjustment yet to come!

Despite that – and despite a reported 42bp decline in TXPR and a 79bp hit for TXPL – it was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market today, with PerpetualDiscounts off 6bp, FixedResets down 62bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 4bp. There is a very lengthy list of performance highlights, just like the old days of 2008, dominated of course by FixedReset losers with a large contingent of Enbridge issues, spooked by the credit muttering. Volume was average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0285 % 2,518.1
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0285 % 3,986.7
Floater 2.99 % 3.10 % 63,408 19.41 4 0.0285 % 2,677.0
OpRet 4.39 % -11.90 % 27,137 0.08 2 -0.0390 % 2,759.6
SplitShare 4.27 % 3.63 % 41,879 3.75 5 0.0791 % 3,198.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0390 % 2,523.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.41 % -2.69 % 73,001 0.09 20 0.0605 % 2,487.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.14 % 5.03 % 115,315 15.40 15 -0.0652 % 2,666.9
FixedReset 4.20 % 3.58 % 196,880 8.57 74 -0.6162 % 2,561.5
Deemed-Retractible 4.97 % -0.69 % 94,662 0.15 40 0.0446 % 2,614.7
FloatingReset 2.54 % 1.88 % 60,146 3.48 5 -0.1569 % 2,544.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
HSE.PR.A FixedReset -4.34 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 19.61
Evaluated at bid price : 19.61
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset -3.92 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 20.82
Evaluated at bid price : 20.82
Bid-YTW : 3.63 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset -3.41 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.50
Evaluated at bid price : 21.50
Bid-YTW : 3.58 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset -3.20 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.30
Bid-YTW : 5.16 %
ENB.PR.Y FixedReset -2.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.14
Evaluated at bid price : 22.75
Bid-YTW : 4.17 %
ENB.PR.H FixedReset -2.45 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.63
Evaluated at bid price : 21.91
Bid-YTW : 4.09 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset -1.87 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 19.97
Evaluated at bid price : 19.97
Bid-YTW : 3.57 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset -1.70 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.20
Bid-YTW : 5.30 %
ENB.PR.B FixedReset -1.67 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.10
Evaluated at bid price : 24.10
Bid-YTW : 3.89 %
ENB.PR.D FixedReset -1.62 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.78
Evaluated at bid price : 23.66
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
BAM.PR.X FixedReset -1.61 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.45
Evaluated at bid price : 21.45
Bid-YTW : 3.98 %
ENB.PR.J FixedReset -1.60 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.08
Evaluated at bid price : 24.60
Bid-YTW : 4.02 %
ENB.PF.E FixedReset -1.47 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.07
Evaluated at bid price : 24.82
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
ENB.PF.A FixedReset -1.39 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.11
Evaluated at bid price : 24.86
Bid-YTW : 4.05 %
ENB.PR.N FixedReset -1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.03
Evaluated at bid price : 24.41
Bid-YTW : 4.04 %
ENB.PR.T FixedReset -1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.78
Evaluated at bid price : 23.92
Bid-YTW : 4.01 %
ENB.PR.P FixedReset -1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.80
Evaluated at bid price : 23.92
Bid-YTW : 4.01 %
BAM.PF.B FixedReset -1.19 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.20
Evaluated at bid price : 24.96
Bid-YTW : 3.99 %
TRP.PR.B FixedReset -1.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 17.75
Evaluated at bid price : 17.75
Bid-YTW : 3.77 %
BAM.PF.A FixedReset -1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.55
Bid-YTW : 4.13 %
ENB.PF.G FixedReset -1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.09
Evaluated at bid price : 24.92
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount 1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 24.04
Evaluated at bid price : 24.45
Bid-YTW : 4.86 %
IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 1.24 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.75
Bid-YTW : 5.23 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
ENB.PR.P FixedReset 521,700 Desjardins sold 18,500 to Scotia at 24.10, then blocks of 125,500 shares, 241,000 shares, 15,600 and 16,000 to anonymous, all at 24.00, and finally crossed 65,200 at 24.00. Nice tickets!
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.80
Evaluated at bid price : 23.92
Bid-YTW : 4.01 %
ENB.PF.C FixedReset 199,713 Desjardins sold blocks of 111,200 and 55,200 to anonymous at 25.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.13
Evaluated at bid price : 24.96
Bid-YTW : 4.01 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 157,332 TD crossed 14,300 at 21.40 and 20,000 at 21.35. RBC crossed 37,300 at 21.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.39
Evaluated at bid price : 21.39
Bid-YTW : 3.85 %
MFC.PR.N FixedReset 120,750 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.06
Bid-YTW : 3.73 %
ENB.PF.E FixedReset 67,617 National crossed 26,000 at 25.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.07
Evaluated at bid price : 24.82
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
ENB.PF.G FixedReset 37,700 RBC bought 11,500 from anonymous at 25.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.09
Evaluated at bid price : 24.92
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
There were 29 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PVS.PR.C SplitShare Quote: 25.90 – 26.90
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.5898

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-12-10
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.90
Bid-YTW : 3.16 %

BAM.PF.E FixedReset Quote: 25.25 – 26.25
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.5928

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.22
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 3.93 %

HSE.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 19.61 – 20.36
Spot Rate : 0.7500
Average : 0.4868

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 19.61
Evaluated at bid price : 19.61
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %

PWF.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 21.50 – 22.19
Spot Rate : 0.6900
Average : 0.4603

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 21.50
Evaluated at bid price : 21.50
Bid-YTW : 3.58 %

ENB.PR.Y FixedReset Quote: 22.75 – 23.10
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2344

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 22.14
Evaluated at bid price : 22.75
Bid-YTW : 4.17 %

BAM.PR.T FixedReset Quote: 25.02 – 25.49
Spot Rate : 0.4700
Average : 0.3566

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-04
Maturity Price : 23.52
Evaluated at bid price : 25.02
Bid-YTW : 3.73 %

Rating Agencies Unhappy With Enbridge

December 4th, 2014

Enbridge announced some very shareholder-friendly moves yesterday:

  • 33% dividend increase, payable March 1, 2015
  • Plans to transfer Canadian Liquids Pipelines business to Enbridge Income Fund
  • New dividend payout policy range of 75% to 85% of adjusted earnings
  • 2015 Adjusted EPS guidance of $2.05 to $2.35
  • Parallel U.S. restructuring plan under consideration


These actions are intended to enhance the value to investors of the Company’s record organic growth capital program and enhance the competitiveness of its funding costs for new organic growth opportunities and asset acquisitions.

The Canadian restructuring plan has been approved in principle by Enbridge’s Board of Directors but remains subject to finalization of preliminary internal reorganization steps and a number of internal and external consents and approvals, including final approval of definitive transfer terms by the Enbridge Board and by the Boards of Holdings and the Fund following a recommendation by an independent committee of the Fund and Holdings, and the receipt of all necessary shareholder and regulatory approvals that may be required.

Enbridge also has under review a potential parallel U.S. restructuring plan which would involve transfer of its directly held U.S. Liquids Pipelines assets to its U.S. affiliate, Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (EEP). This review has not yet progressed to a conclusion.

Commenting on today’s announcement, Al Monaco, President and Chief Executive Officer, Enbridge Inc., noted the following:

“The 33% increase in our dividend that we announced today and 14% to 16% expected annual average dividend growth rate through 2018 reflects Management’s confidence in the strength and embedded cash flow growth from the existing assets and the capital projects that will be put into service over the next four years. The change in our dividend policy range to 75 – 85% of adjusted earnings is supported by the excellent progress we’ve made on our enterprise-wide funding program, raising some $16 billion in debt and equity capital over the last two years; the expected increase in free cash flow through 2018; and reliable access to effective sources of equity funding including from our sponsored vehicles.

Today, shareholders indicated they are in favour of shareholder friendliness:

Enbridge Inc. (ENB) surged the most in 27 years after Canada’s largest pipeline operator boosted its dividend and said it plans to shift assets to an affiliate.

The shares climbed 10 percent in Toronto, the biggest gain since October 1987. The stock has increased 29 percent this year.

Enbridge said yesterday it plans to move C$17 billion ($15 billion) worth of Canadian liquids pipelines to the Enbridge Income Fund to help pay for capital investment. The company also boosted its dividend 33 percent and said earnings per share next year will be C$2.05 to C$2.35.

The so-called dropdown allows Enbridge “to accelerate dividend growth immediately and for the next 4+ years,” Matthew Akman, a Toronto-based analyst for ScotiaBank, wrote in a note today.

The boost in dividend comes as oil producers are cutting their payouts. Canadian Oil Sands Ltd. yesterday said it would reduce its quarterly dividend by 42 percent to 20 cents a share in late January. Enbridge ships crude from Canadian producers through its network of pipelines across North America.

Assiduous Readers will have no problem with the following pop quiz: “Shareholder-friendly actions are creditor _______________” (for the answer, see the bottom of this post).

Moody’s affirmed the rating but changed the outlook to negative:

Moody’s Investors Service has affirmed its ratings on Enbridge Inc (ENB), Enbridge Energy Partners L.P. (EEP), Enbridge Income Fund (EIF) and Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership (EELP) and Enbridge (U.S.) Inc. At the same time, Moody’s changed the outlooks on ENB, EEP, and EELP to negative. The outlook on EIF has been changed to developing. This follows Enbridge’s news release dated December 3 announcing a material financial restructuring and significant dividend increase. For a complete list of Moody’s ratings actions see the end of this press release.

“The negative outlook reflects the uncertainty surrounding the announced financial restructuring plans and the prospects for increased structural subordination at ENB, the company’s weak consolidated financial metrics and the reduction in financial flexibility associated with the proposed increase in dividends.” said Gavin MacFarlane, Vice President/Senior Analyst.

The company’s financial restructuring plans represent a substantial change in the company’s structure, with approximately C$17 billion in assets to be transferred to EIF from ENB. This compares to current total assets at ENB of C$67 billion and EIF of C$2.7 billion at 30 September 2014. One of the entities being transferred, Enbridge Pipelines (Athabasca) Inc. has no external debt, highlighting the increased structural subordination that will result at ENB going forward. The Canadian liquids pipeline business currently with assets of $16 billion and an associated capital program of $15 billion dominates the proposed transfer. Management has also indicated that it is contemplating a potential parallel U.S. restructuring plan that would transfer all of ENB’s US liquids assets to EEP.

Consolidated FFO/debt of 10.2% on an LTM basis remains weak and is slightly above the 10% adjusted FFO/debt level we have associated with a potential downgrade. The proposed increase in the dividend payout ratio from a range of 60-70% to 75-85% weakens the company’s financial flexibility as it moves forward with its current consolidated capital program of about $44 billion over the period 2014-2018. The increase is slightly mitigated by being tied to the execution of the capital program and any associated moderation in spend. On a consolidated basis, the business risk profile of ENB is unchanged.

We will look to resolve the outlooks when there is greater certainty and clarity surrounding the proposed restructuring in 2015.

It was only two weeks ago that I reported that S&P changed the outlook on ENB to Negative. Now the other shoe has dropped:

  • •We are placing our ratings on Calgary, Alta.-based Enbridge Inc. and Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Toronto-based Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc., and Houston-based Enbridge Energy Partners L.P. on CreditWatch with negative implications.
  • •The CreditWatch placements follows the announcement of dropdown of assets from parent Enbridge to Enbridge Income Fund (EIF), as well as a change to the company’s dividend policy.
  • •We believe that there is a potential for financial metrics to weaken further due to the additional dividend expense.
  • •In addition, the dropdown into EIF could raise the issue of subordination of debt at the Enbridge level.


The CreditWatch placements reflect our assessment of the existing weak forecast financial metrics at parent Enbridge, combined with the announced change in dividend policy and the dropdown of assets to subsidiary Enbridge Income Fund (EIF). Enbridge intends to increase its dividend payout ratio to 75%-85% of adjusted net income, from 60%-70%, effective March 2015. In addition, the dropdown plan covers US$17 billion of assets, comprising the Canadian liquids pipeline and renewable energy portfolio.

“We believe that there is a potential for financial metrics to weaken further due to the additional dividend expense, depending on the ultimate financing strategy,” said Standard & Poor’s credit analyst Gerry Hannochko. “As well, the dropdown to EIF could raise the issue of subordination of debt at the Enbridge level,” Mr. Hannochko added.

In addition, the company is contemplating transferring Enbridge’s U.S.-based liquids pipeline assets to subsidiary EEP.

On Nov. 21, 2014, we revised the outlook on the Enbridge group to negative based on weak forecast financials that we assess to be below the threshold for the “significant” financial risk profile category.

Compared with this, DBRS has been quite restrained:

DBRS Limited (DBRS) has today placed all ratings of Enbridge Inc. (ENB), Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (EPI) and Enbridge Income Fund (EIF or the Fund) as follows Under Review with Developing Implications:

The current rating actions reflect uncertainty associated with the ongoing corporate developments, percentage take-up of the debt exchange and the future funding strategy among the entities within ENB’s organization. For clarity, DBRS does not rule out potential future rating changes for any of the entities placed Under Review today and will provide updates as more information becomes available

From a financial risk perspective, DBRS expects a mix of factors to affect ENB’s future ratings. Firstly, a material increase in dividend payout combined with the proposed Transaction would mean that ENB would have to rely more on external funds to finance its portion of capex which, while substantial over the 2014 to 2018 period, would be reduced on a direct-to-ENB basis. Secondly, direct external debt at ENB would be reduced by the proposed debt exchange, although the sizable preferred shares outstanding at ENB would remain unchanged and would continue to weigh on ENB’s credit metrics. Finally, since all assets of EPI and EPA would be transferred to the Fund, holders of ENB’s direct external debt would be further away from the cash flow of the Transferred Assets than is currently the case. Dividend distributions from the Transferred Assets would have to be used to support debt service at the Fund before dividends could then be distributed to ENB. At this time, there are uncertainties with respect to the debt exchange details and the future financing needs at the ENB level as well as the amount of dividends to be received at ENB. Consequently, while DBRS believes that Under Review with Developing Implications is the appropriate rating action at this time, DBRS does not rule out a negative rating action in the future based on further analysis.

Enbridge Inc. is the issuer of (deep breath) ENB.PR.A (Straight Perpetual), ENB.PR.B, ENB.PR.D, ENB.PR.F, ENB.PR.H, ENB.PR.J, ENB.PR.N, ENB.PR.P, ENB.PR.T, ENB.PR.Y, ENB.PF.A, ENB.PF.C, ENB.PF.E and ENB.PF.G (FixedResets) and ENB.PR.U, ENB.PR.V, ENB.PF.U and ENB.PF.V (US-Pay FixedResets).

All told, I believe that total issuance comprises roughly 10% of the Canadian preferred share market, virtually all of which has come out since the issue of ENB.PR.B just over three years ago. A downgrade to junk would certainly make the market a bit more interesting for a while!

Answer to Pop-Quiz : ʎlpuǝᴉɹɟun ɹoʇᴉpǝɹɔ ǝɹɐ suoᴉʇɔɐ ʎlpuǝᴉɹɟ-ɹǝploɥǝɹɐɥS

December 3, 2014

December 3rd, 2014

The BoC announced its rate decision:

The Bank of Canada today announced that it is maintaining its target for the overnight rate at 1 per cent. The Bank Rate is correspondingly 1 1/4 per cent and the deposit rate is 3/4 per cent.

Inflation has risen by more than expected. The increase in inflation over the past year is largely due to the temporary effects of a lower Canadian dollar and some sector-specific factors, notably telecommunications and meat prices. Underlying inflation has edged up but remains below 2 per cent.

The U.S. economy has clearly strengthened, particularly business investment, which has benefitted Canada’s exports. Growth in the rest of the world, in contrast, continues to disappoint, leading authorities in some regions to deploy further policy stimulus. Oil prices have continued to fall, due to both supply and demand developments. In this context, global financial conditions have eased further.

Canada’s economy is showing signs of a broadening recovery. Stronger exports are beginning to be reflected in increased business investment and employment. This suggests that the hoped-for sequence of rebuilding that will lead to balanced and self-sustaining growth may finally have begun. However, the lower profile for oil and certain other commodity prices will weigh on the Canadian economy.

The net effect of these recent developments, together with upward revisions to historical data, is that the output gap appears to be smaller than the Bank had projected in the October Monetary Policy Report (MPR). However, the labour market continues to indicate significant slack in the economy.

While inflation is at a higher starting point relative to the October MPR, weaker oil prices pose an important downside risk to the inflation profile. This is tempered by a stronger U.S. economy, Canadian dollar depreciation, and recent federal fiscal measures. Household imbalances, meanwhile, present a significant risk to financial stability. Overall, the balance of risks remains within the zone for which the current stance of monetary policy is appropriate and therefore the target for the overnight rate remains at 1 per cent.

One pundit thinks the bank is preparing for a rate hike in 2015:

RBC Dominion Securities economist Mark Chandler said fading economic slack is “an important part of laying the groundwork for higher rates in 2015.”

… and household debt is increasing:

The central bank has oft cited this threat as household debt burdens rose to record levels. Its latest red flag went up on the same day as two reports underscored the swollen debts among Canadians just as the holiday shopping frenzy begins.

In one report, Equifax Canada said that “Canadian consumers have yet again tipped the scales setting a new benchmark of over $1.513-trillion in debt.”

That third-quarter figure marked an increase from $1.448-trillion in the second quarter and $1.409-trillion a year earlier, according to Equifax, whose numbers are based on more than 25 million unique consumer files.

Excluding mortgages, average debt held by Canadians has increased 2.7 per cent to $20,891.

There is a bright spot, however, in that delinquency rates declined.

Co-operators General Insurance Company, proud issuer of CCS.PR.C was confirmed at Pfd-3(high) by DBRS:

The Co-operators Group, by tradition, has strong presence in rural markets and obtains excellent brand recognition. The property and casualty operations rank in the top six by premiums in Canada. The Group is making efforts to achieve client growth in Québec and is utilizing direct response marketing in Ontario and Alberta. The Group maintains conservative regulatory capital ratios, which supports the rating given the capital raising constraints of a cooperative.

The general insurance business has had difficulty keeping combined ratios at acceptable levels for the rating. The Company is looking at better segmentation to improve results and has been investing in technology and process improvement to achieve a better customer experience. Financial leverage is at reasonable level and supportive of the rating.

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, proud issuer of FFH.PR.C, FFH.PR.E, FFH.PR.G, FFH.PR.I and FFH.PR.K, was confirmed at Pfd-3 by DBRS:

Over the long term, Fairfax has generally achieved strong investment results on the investment portfolios it manages for its insurance subsidiaries. With willingness to take advantage of market disruptions and distressed valuations for particular securities and purchase hedges against general market downturns versus the actual portfolio investments, the active investment management generates volatile financial results.

Financial leverage (preferred shares and debt-to-total capital), although declining from September 2013, remains at the upper range for the rating in the mid-thirties. Fixed charge coverage ratios have been very low for the last few years, with low profitability, but the year-to-date (September 2014) results have yielded a desirable ratio. The Company maintains a minimum balance of $1 billion in cash and marketable securities at the holding company for liquidity and contingent subsidiary capital needs, which is viewed as prudent given the earnings volatility.

The Company’s management culture places a high reliance on local management to manage their businesses prudently. The decentralized structure has allowed Fairfax to grow by acquisition globally to take advantage of profitable niches held by existing businesses. DBRS realizes this decentralized management structure contrasts sharply with most Canadian financial institutions, but notes that, if done correctly and with the right businesses and people, it can be a successful strategy, which the Company has been able to demonstrate.

HSBC Bank Canada, proud issuer of HSB.PR.C and HSB.PR.D, has been confirmed at Pfd-2 by DBRS (for NVCC non-compliant shares):

With Canada being a priority market for the HSBC Group, HSBC Bank Canada benefits from the strength of the Parent and the international capabilities and relationships of one of the largest banking groups in the world. HSBC has good intrinsic strengths, including its low cost-to-income ratio and superior customer service model, somewhat offset by geographic and industry concentrations, its historically higher interest-rate risk tolerance and scale challenges in its retail banking and wealth management businesses.

The Bank continues to execute on its strategy of growing its Commercial Banking and its Global Banking and Markets segments. At the same time, HSBC has made strides to increase presence with credit cards, mortgages and wealth products, particularly with its globally affluent customers. Earnings have continued to be good, with ROE in the mid-teens and risk metrics strong, although somewhat lumpy due to the proportions of commercial and wholesale lending.

Notable business changes over the past couple of years are largely complete, allowing the Bank to concentrate on its strategy, although implementing HSBC Group-wide improvements in compliance and risk controls may continue to occupy management attention. The run-off of the consumer finance portfolio is proceeding as planned, as is the repositioning of business banking towards clients with multi-product opportunities and lower compliance risk.

It was a poor day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts losing 20bp, FixedResets off 8bp and DeemedRetractibles down 11bp. Volatility was minor, but exciting anyway. Volume was slightly below average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2134 % 2,517.4
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2134 % 3,985.6
Floater 2.99 % 3.11 % 63,840 19.39 4 -0.2134 % 2,676.2
OpRet 4.39 % -12.05 % 27,216 0.08 2 0.0782 % 2,760.6
SplitShare 4.27 % 3.63 % 43,605 3.75 5 0.1347 % 3,195.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0782 % 2,524.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.42 % -2.85 % 75,995 0.09 20 0.1387 % 2,485.9
Perpetual-Discount 5.14 % 5.03 % 116,328 15.40 15 -0.2037 % 2,668.6
FixedReset 4.17 % 3.57 % 193,501 8.63 74 -0.0849 % 2,577.4
Deemed-Retractible 4.97 % -0.75 % 98,012 0.16 40 -0.1128 % 2,613.5
FloatingReset 2.54 % 1.89 % 60,591 3.49 5 -0.1097 % 2,548.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
HSE.PR.A FixedReset -5.09 % This is a real drop, since several trades were executed below 20.50, but the volume around these levels (about 1,600 shares, late in the day) was low relative to the day’s trading of 19,629 shares. The VWAP was $20.99. The weakness is probably related to yesterday’s new issue announcement.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 20.50
Evaluated at bid price : 20.50
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %
BAM.PF.D Perpetual-Discount -1.46 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 21.90
Evaluated at bid price : 22.23
Bid-YTW : 5.60 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
MFC.PR.N FixedReset 707,152 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.07
Bid-YTW : 3.72 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 281,206 Scotia crossed 177,100 at 21.27. Will reset at 3.266% December 31.YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 21.33
Evaluated at bid price : 21.33
Bid-YTW : 3.86 %
ENB.PR.P FixedReset 71,210 RBC crossed 50,000 at 24.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 22.93
Evaluated at bid price : 24.23
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
ENB.PF.C FixedReset 62,053 RBC crossed 50,000 at 25.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 23.21
Evaluated at bid price : 25.20
Bid-YTW : 3.96 %
FTS.PR.M FixedReset 60,325 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 25.65.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-12-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.57
Bid-YTW : 3.62 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 57,062 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 20.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 20.35
Evaluated at bid price : 20.35
Bid-YTW : 3.50 %
There were 27 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
SLF.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 20.55 – 20.90
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2382

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.55
Bid-YTW : 5.10 %

MFC.PR.H FixedReset Quote: 26.00 – 26.45
Spot Rate : 0.4500
Average : 0.3496

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.00
Bid-YTW : 2.71 %

BAM.PR.T FixedReset Quote: 25.26 – 25.59
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2323

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 23.60
Evaluated at bid price : 25.26
Bid-YTW : 3.68 %

FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.20 – 24.55
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2582

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-03
Maturity Price : 23.81
Evaluated at bid price : 24.20
Bid-YTW : 4.92 %

SLF.PR.D Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.96 – 23.24
Spot Rate : 0.2800
Average : 0.1897

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.96
Bid-YTW : 5.49 %

IFC.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 24.34 – 24.65
Spot Rate : 0.3100
Average : 0.2234

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.34
Bid-YTW : 3.90 %

MFC.PR.N Firm On Decent Volume

December 3rd, 2014

Manulife Financial Corporation has announced:

that it has completed its offering of 10 million Non-cumulative Rate Reset Class 1 Shares Series 19 (the “Series 19 Preferred Shares”) at a price of $25 per share to raise gross proceeds of $250 million.

The offering was underwritten by a syndicate of investment dealers co-led by Scotia Capital Inc., CIBC World Markets and RBC Capital Markets. The Series 19 Preferred Shares commence trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange today under the ticker symbol MFC.PR.N.

The Series 19 Preferred Shares were issued under a prospectus supplement dated November 26, 2014 to Manulife’s short form base shelf prospectus dated June 23, 2014.

MFC.PR.N is a FixedReset, 3.80%+230, announced November 26. It will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and has been assigned to the FixedResets index.

Note that since this is issued by an Insurance Holding Company and is not convertible (or otherwise potentially NVCC-compliant), I have added a DeemedMaturity to the option schedule for analytical purposes, at $25.00 for 2025-1-31.

MFC.PR.N traded 1,163,652 shares today (consolidated exchanges) in a range of 24.95-12 before closing at 25.07-10. Vital statistics are:

MFC.PR.N FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.07
Bid-YTW : 3.72 %

Implied volatility theory suggests that this issue is fairly priced relative to other MFC issues … but remember that the Implied Volatility calculation ignores DeemedMaturities and the calculated volatility is very high!

impVol_MFC_141203

Deriving a Reset Yield

December 3rd, 2014

We have been treated to the spectacle of three FixedResets resetting their dividend on the same day … TRP.PR.A To Reset To 3.266%, AZP.PR.B To Reset To 5.57% and FFH.PR.C To Reset To 4.578%.

Let’s have a little look at how all these rates were calculated. I regret I cannot link directly to the prospectuses because the Canadian Securities Administrators insist that this public information be available to retail scum only in an inconvenient manner.

TRP.PR.A: SEDAR TransCanada Corporation Sep 23 2009 16:14:12 ET Prospectus supplement – English PDF 127 K

‘‘Fixed Rate Calculation Date’’ means, for any Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the 30th day prior to the first day of such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period.

‘‘Government of Canada Yield’’ on any date means the yield to maturity on such date (assuming semi-annual compounding) of a Canadian dollar denominated non-callable Government of Canada bond with a term to maturity of five years as quoted as of 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on such date and that appears on the Bloomberg Screen GCAN5YR Page on such date; provided that if such rate does not appear on the Bloomberg Screen GCAN5YR Page on such date, then the Government of Canada Yield shall mean the arithmetic average of the yields quoted to the Corporation by two registered Canadian investment dealers selected by the Corporation as being the annual yield to maturity on such date, compounded semi-annually, that a non-callable Government of Canada bond would carry if issued, in Canadian dollars, at 100% of its principal amount on such date with a term to maturity of five years.

AZP.PR.B: SEDAR Atlantic Power Preferred Equity Ltd. Oct 21 2009 17:20:19 ET Final short form prospectus – English PDF 229 K:

“Bloomberg Screen GCAN5YR Page” means the display designated on page “GCAN5YR” on the Bloomberg Financial L.P. service (or such other page as may replace the GCAN5YR page on that service for purposes of displaying Government of Canada Bond yields).

“Fixed Rate Calculation Date” means, for any Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the 30th day prior to the first day of such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period.

“Government of Canada Bond Yield” on any date means the yield to maturity on such date (assuming semi-annual compounding) of a Canadian dollar denominated non-callable Government of Canada bond with a term to maturity of five years as quoted as of 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on such date and which appears on the Bloomberg Screen GCAN5YR Page on such date; provided that, if such rate does not appear on the Bloomberg Screen GCAN5YR Page on such date, the Government of Canada Bond Yield will mean the arithmetic average of the yields quoted to the Corporation by two registered Canadian investment dealers selected by the Corporation as being the annual yield to maturity on such date, compounded semi-annually, which a non-callable Government of Canada bond would carry if issued, in Canadian dollars in Canada, at 100% of its principal amount on such date with a term to maturity of five years.

FFH.PR.C: SEDAR Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited Sep 29 2009 18:40:58 ET Prospectus supplement – English PDF 419 K

“Bloomberg Screen GCAN5YR Page” means the display designated as page “GCAN5YRGINDEXH” on the Bloomberg Financial L.P. service (or such other page as may replace the GCAN5YR page on that service) for purposes of displaying Government of Canada bond yields.

“Fixed Rate Calculation Date” means, for any Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the 30th day prior to the first day of such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period.

“Government of Canada Yield” on any date means the yield to maturity on such date (assuming semi-annual compounding) of a Canadian dollar denominated non-callable Government of Canada bond with a term to maturity of five years as quoted as of 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on such date and which appears on the Bloomberg Screen GCAN5YR Page on such date; provided that, if such rate does not appear on the Bloomberg Screen GCAN5YR Page on such date, the Government of Canada Yield will mean the average of the yields determined by two registered Canadian investment dealers selected by the Company, as being the yield to maturity on such date (assuming semi-annual compounding) which a Canadian dollar denominated non-callable Government of Canada bond would carry if issued in Canadian dollars at 100% of its principal amount on such date with a term to maturity of five years.

OK, so according to me these reset yields are calculated in all the same way at the same time. So let’s look at the announced reset yields and see what the GOC-5 yield was:

Issue Announced
Rate
Spread Presumed
GOC-5
Yield
TRP.PR.A 3.266% 192bp 1.346%
AZP.PR.B 5.57% 418bp 1.39%
FFH.PR.C 4.578% 315bp 1.428%

Eight basis points difference? On a five year Canada? When all the calculations are supposed to be performed the same way at the same time?

This is very odd.

Accordingly, I have sent the following eMail to investor_relations@transcanada.com:

Sirs,

I understand that the dividend on TRP.PR.A is to be reset to 3.266% in accordance with the terms of the prospectus, which implies that the “Government of Canada Yield”, as defined in the prospectus, was 1.346% at 10am on December 1.

However, as discussed at https://prefblog.com/?p=26996 , measurements of this yield taken at the same time, in the same manner and for the same purpose by two other companies resulted in assessments of 1.39% and 1.428%, which are very different numbers when one considers what is being measured.

I would appreciate receiving further details of your calculation of the “Government of Canada Yield”, as defined, with any supporting material that you choose to provide.

Sincerely,

… but it appears that I will have to call John Varnell of Fairfax at (416) 367-4941 and Computershare on behalf of Atlantic Power at (800) 564-6253 because those companies haven’t implemented eMail yet, as far as I can tell.

Update, 2014-12-3: TRP got back to me with a link to the prospectus and a quote from it which duplicates part of the text I’ve quoted above. I’ve left a message with John Varnell of FFH, and with the Investor Relations department of AZP.

Update #2, 2014-12-3: TRP’s Investor Relations department has forwarded the query to Treasury, and expect to hear back tomorrow.

Update, 2014-12-5: See the post Deriving Reset Yields: Mystery Partially Resolved

FFH.PR.C To Reset To 4.578%

December 2nd, 2014

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited has announced:

that it has determined the fixed dividend rate on its Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series C (“Series C Shares”) (TSX:FFH.PR.C) for the five years commencing January 1, 2015 and ending December 31, 2019, with the result that the quarterly dividends on the Series C Shares during that period will be paid at an annual rate equal to Cdn.$1.14450 per share.

Holders of Series C Shares have the right, at their option, to convert all or part of their Series C Shares, on a one-for-one basis, into Cumulative Floating Rate Preferred Shares, Series D (the “Series D Shares”), effective December 31, 2014. The deadline for exercising this conversion privilege is 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on December 16, 2014.

The quarterly floating rate dividends on the Series D Shares will be paid at an annual rate, calculated for each quarter, of 3.15% over the annual yield on three-month Government of Canada treasury bills (calculated as set out in the prospectus supplement relating to the public offering of the Series C Shares dated September 29, 2009). The quarterly dividend amount in respect of the initial dividend period will be Cdn.$0.25212 per share, payable on March 31, 2015.

As provided in the share conditions of the Series C Shares, (i) if Fairfax determines that there would be fewer than 1,000,000 Series C Shares outstanding after December 31, 2014, all remaining Series C Shares will be automatically converted into Series D Shares on a one-for-one basis effective December 31, 2014; and (ii) if Fairfax determines that there would be fewer than 1,000,000 Series D Shares outstanding after December 31, 2014, no Series C Shares will be permitted to be converted into Series D Shares. There are currently 10,000,000 Series C Shares outstanding.

The Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) has conditionally approved the listing of the Series D Shares effective upon conversion. Listing of the Series D Shares is subject to Fairfax fulfilling all the listing requirements of the TSX and, upon approval, the Series D Shares will be listed on the TSX under the trading symbol “FFH.PR.D”.

FFH.PR.C is a FixedReset, 5.75%+315, which commenced trading 2009-10-5 after being announced 2009-9-29.

From a 5.75% coupon to 4.578% is a big hit – a reduction in income of just over 20%.

The new rate of 4.578% implies that the five-year Canada was at 1.428% at time of measurement, significantly higher than 1.346%”used for TRP.PR.A. Very curious.

Using similar arguments to those made with respect to TRP.PR.A, I suggest that conversion to the FloatingReset issue is currently favoured, with a projected price on the FloatingReset of 25.06 compared to 24.78 for the FixedReset. However, any decision should be made at the last possible moment – which will be earlier than the company’s last possible moment of 5pm, December 16, 2014. Check with your broker to determine what their deadline is!

AZP.PR.B To Reset To 5.57%

December 2nd, 2014

Atlantic Power Corporation and Atlantic Power Preferred Equity Ltd. have announced:

the dividend rate on Preferred Equity’s outstanding Cumulative Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Shares”) will be reset on December 31, 2014, using a reset dividend rate (the “Reset Dividend Rate”) calculated on December 1, 2014.

The Reset Dividend Rate was calculated on December 1, 2014 to be 5.57%, representing the sum of the Canadian Government five-year bond yield of 1.39% plus 4.18%.

Such Reset Dividend Rate will commence with the March 31, 2015 dividend payment to the holders of the Series 2 Shares and continue through the December 31, 2019 dividend payment to the holders of the Series 2 Shares, at which time such Reset Dividend Rate will again be reset.

On December 31, 2014 and again on December 31 of every fifth year thereafter, the holders of Series 2 Shares have the right to convert their Series 2 Shares, on a one-for-one basis, into Cumulative Floating Rate Preferred Shares (the “Series 3 Shares”).

The Series 3 Shares dividend rate was calculated on December 1, 2014 to be 5.09%, representing the sum of the Canadian Government 90-day Treasury Bill yield (using the three-month average result of .91%) plus 4.18%.

Holders of Series 2 Shares who wish to convert such securities to Series 3 Shares should contact the financial institution, broker or other intermediary through which they hold the Series 2 Shares to exercise this conversion privilege. Notice of the exercise of the conversion privilege must be received by Preferred Equity not earlier than December 1, 2014 and not later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on December 16, 2014.

If after giving effect to all Election Notices, there would remain outstanding less than 1 million Series 2 Shares, then all remaining outstanding Series 2 Shares will automatically convert into Series 3 Shares, on a one-for-one basis on December 31, 2014. Holders of the Series 2 Shares will not be permitted to convert their Series 2 Shares into Series 3 Shares if, after giving effect to all Election Notices, there would be outstanding less than 1 million Series 3 Shares.

Inquiries should be directed to Preferred Equity’s registrar and transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company of Canada, at (800) 564-6253.

AZP.PR.B used to be CZP.PR.B, which used to be EPP.PR.B, and throughout has been a FixedReset, 7.00%+418, which commenced trading 2009-11-2 after being announced 2009-10-13. You can’t tell your players without a programme!

The new rate of 5.57% is a sharp drop from 7.00%, just over 20% of the coupon in fact. This probably explains recent weakness in the issue’s price, although the company has not exactly been a picture of health lately.

Using similar arguments to those made with respect to TRP.PR.A, I suggest that conversion to the FloatingReset issue is currently favoured, with a projected price on the FloatingReset of 12.35 compared to 12.10 for the FixedReset … which looks better in percentage terms than absolutes! However, any decision should be made at the last possible moment – which will be earlier than the company’s last possible moment of 5pm, December 16, 2014. Check with your broker to determine what their deadline is!

TRP.PR.A To Reset To 3.266%

December 2nd, 2014

TransCanada Corporation has announced:

that it has notified the registered shareholder of its Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series 1 (Series 1 Shares) of the Conversion Privilege and Dividend Rate Notice.

Beginning on December 1, 2014 and ending on December 16, 2014, holders of the Series 1 Shares will have the right to choose one of the following options with regard to their shares:
1.To retain any or all of their Series 1 Shares and continue to receive a fixed quarterly dividend; or
2.To convert, on a one-for-one basis, any or all of their Series 1 Shares into Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series 2 (Series 2 Shares) of TransCanada and receive a floating quarterly dividend.

Holders of the Series 1 Shares and the Series 2 Shares will have the opportunity to convert their shares again on December 31, 2019, and every five years thereafter as long as the shares remain outstanding.

Effective December 1, 2014, the Annual Fixed Dividend Rate for the Series 1 shares was set for the next five year period at 3.266 per cent.

Effective December 1, 2014, the Floating Quarterly Dividend for the Series 2 Shares was set for the first Quarterly Floating Rate Period (being the period from and including December 31, 2014, to but excluding March 31, 2015) at 2.815 per cent. The Floating Quarterly Dividend Rate will be reset every quarter.

The Series 1 Shares are issued in “book entry only” form and, as such, the sole registered holder of the Series 1 Shares is the Canadian Depositary for Securities Limited (CDS). All rights of beneficial holders of Series 1 Shares must be exercised through CDS or the CDS participant through which the Series 1 Shares are held. The deadline for the registered shareholder to provide notice of exercise of the right to convert Series 1 Shares into Series 2 Shares is 5 p.m. (ET) on December 16, 2014. Any notices received after this deadline will not be valid. As such, holders of Series 1 Shares who wish to exercise their right to convert their shares should contact their broker or other intermediary for more information and it is recommended that this be done well in advance of the deadline in order to provide the broker or other intermediary with time to complete the necessary steps.

For more information on the terms of, and risks associated with an investment in, the Series 1 Shares and the Series 2 Shares, please see the Corporation’s prospectus supplement dated September 22, 2009 which can be found under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

TRP.PR.A is a FixedReset, 4.60%+192, which closed 2009-9-30 after being announced 2009-9-22.

From 4.60% coupon to 3.266% is a big hit – a 29% reduction. And it’s a big issue – $550-million par value. I anticipate a lot of highly unhappy brokerage customers who may, as has been speculated previously, be overselling the issue so they don’t have to see any reduced dividends.

The new rate of 3.266% implies that the GOC-5 rate at time of measurement was 1.346%, which sounds about right according to what I saw yesterday (the BoC says yesterday’s close was 1.38%), but it is most interesting to note that CBID says today’s close 1.45%. Conspiracy theories regarding manipulation of the GOC-5 rate on a day when three issues reset may be recorded in the comments.

Prices for the TRP issues are very strange: consider that TRP.PR.A, bid at 21.15, is priced lower than TRP.PR.C, which is a FixedReset, 4.40%+154, resetting 2016-1-30, bid at 21.77. One can only suppose that the market expects some dramatic changes in the five year Canada yield over the next year! Implied Volatility analysis – which assumes, among many other things, that GOC-5 will not change, ever – suggests that TRP.PR.A is now $1.44 cheap while TRP.PR.C is $1.73 expensive (both relative only to other TRP FixedResets, not to anything else). Well … place yer bets, gennelmen, place yer bets!

impVol_TRP_141202

So, the perennial question was most recently asked by Assiduous Reader janbjarne and will be highlighted because of the flattering introduction:

Thank you for the very informative Prefblog and PrefLetter.

Your comments on how underpriced TRP.PR.A appears are interesting. Any thoughts on the pending conversion? A few months ago I thought that converting to the floater was a no-brainer. Now I am not so sure as both the TD.PR.Y/Z and the DC.PR.B/D pairs are trading at the same price.

Well, I’m not sure either! If you want absolute certainty, ask a stockbroker! Just don’t be so rude as to remind him of his prediction later!

We can make an informed guess, though, using the Pair Equivalency Calculator which is explained in the article Preferred Pairs. We can examine all the currently trading FixedReset / FloatingReset pairs and determine the break-even average three-month bill rate for each pair:

pairEquivalents_bills_141202
Click for Big

There’s a fair bit of scatter, but the average for investment grade is 1.70% … that is, for each member of each pair to have an identical total return over the period until the next Exchange Date, the average bill rate until that date must be X, and the average of the Xs calculated for each pair is 1.70%, implying (assuming a steady increase in yields) a rate on the end date of 2.55%.

If we then reverse the calculation, the predicted price for the TRP FloatingReset is, given a bid of 21.15 for TRP.PR.A and an average bill rate of 1.70%, equal to 21.53: that is to say, we predict an immediate profit of $0.38 to result from conversion.

Even if we say that the average bill rate will be 1.54%, the lowest of the estimates, the predicted price of the FloatingReset should be 21.36, a profit of $0.21 … no great shakes, but it does indicate that the expectations of at least not losing are reasonably well-founded.

It should be remembered, though, that things can change dramatically in the course of even just a few weeks. The DC.PR.B / DC.PR.D conversion was a missed opportunity, because the break-even rate observed in the market changed dramatically between the date at which the estimate was made and the date the newly issued FloatingReset commenced trading..

Instructions are required by the company by December 16. I suggest holders first check with their broker to see what their broker’s deadline is (it’s usually a day or two earlier) and wait until the last minute before repeating the calculation and making up their mind. But at this point, it looks as if conversion to FloatingReset is the better bet.

December 2, 2014

December 2nd, 2014

They’re playing a sad song in Australia:

Australia’s economy expanded slower than economists forecast in the third quarter, underscoring the central bank’s decision to keep interest rates at a record low. The currency fell to its lowest since July 2010.

Gross domestic product advanced 0.3 percent from the previous three months, when it rose 0.5 percent, a Bureau of Statistics report released in Sydney today showed. The result compared with a median estimate of a 0.7 percent gain from a Bloomberg News survey of 29 economists.

The Reserve Bank of Australia has kept its benchmark rate unchanged at a record low for 16 months as it seeks to encourage spending by consumers and companies to offset falling mining investment. Australian firms, outside of property, have opted to pay dividends or salt away cash rather than invest in new projects as they wait for higher household demand, which has been damped by an 11-year-high unemployment rate.

and there are funding cuts all over:

Funding cuts at Australia’s leading scientific institution CSIRO have led to world-leading researchers seeing their positions abolished. At least one of these, Dr. San Thang, is so committed to his work that he has continued his role unpaid. What makes the story even more poignant is that at the same time Thang was let go, there was speculation he might share a Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

… and the same tune in Russia:

Russia’s economic crisis deepened as the government acknowledged it’s heading for recession and a former central banker spoke of “some panic” in the financial system as oil prices plunged.

Speaking a day after President Vladimir Putin said Russia is scrapping a proposed $45 billion pipeline to Europe, the government predicted the economy will contract next year and canceled a bond auction. It was also forced to pledge 39.95 billion rubles ($740 million) to support OAO Gazprombank, at least the third lender to secure a capital injection since U.S. and European Union sanctions curbed their ability to borrow.

SBN.PR.A was confirmed at Pfd-3 by DBRS:

Based on the most recent dividend paid on the BNS Shares, the dividend income net of management fees and other expenses is expected to cover approximately 47% of the Preferred Share distributions. Holders of the Class A Shares are expected to receive regular monthly cash distributions in an amount targeted to be 6% per annum on the net asset value of the Class A Shares.

On September 5, 2014, DBRS confirmed the ratings of the Preferred Shares at Pfd-3. Since then, the performance of the Company has been volatile, with downside protection decreasing since the last rating action in September 2014 (50.3% as of November 20, 2014). Despite the drop, downside protection remain at levels typically seen at the Pfd-3 level.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts down 18bp, FixedResets off 12bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 7bp. Volatility was average, dominated by FixedReset losers. Volume was above average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1710 % 2,522.8
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1710 % 3,994.1
Floater 2.99 % 3.10 % 62,509 19.41 4 0.1710 % 2,681.9
OpRet 4.40 % -12.64 % 26,659 0.08 2 -0.0391 % 2,758.5
SplitShare 4.28 % 3.85 % 45,402 3.75 5 0.0820 % 3,191.4
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0391 % 2,522.4
Perpetual-Premium 5.42 % -7.85 % 76,863 0.09 20 -0.0391 % 2,482.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.13 % 5.06 % 113,667 15.37 15 -0.1807 % 2,674.1
FixedReset 4.17 % 3.55 % 177,070 8.51 73 -0.1158 % 2,579.6
Deemed-Retractible 4.97 % -1.97 % 98,743 0.16 40 0.0703 % 2,616.5
FloatingReset 2.53 % 1.20 % 60,844 0.16 5 -0.1252 % 2,551.4
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
TRP.PR.B FixedReset -1.79 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-02
Maturity Price : 18.07
Evaluated at bid price : 18.07
Bid-YTW : 3.70 %
FTS.PR.K FixedReset -1.31 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-02
Maturity Price : 23.14
Evaluated at bid price : 24.77
Bid-YTW : 3.46 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset -1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.70
Bid-YTW : 5.01 %
GWO.PR.Q Deemed-Retractible 1.19 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.41
Bid-YTW : 4.92 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
W.PR.J Perpetual-Premium 120,100 Desjardins bought 115,800 from anonymous at 25.18.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.24
Bid-YTW : 2.86 %
CU.PR.E Perpetual-Discount 77,000 Nesbitt crossed 75,000 at 24.60.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-02
Maturity Price : 24.09
Evaluated at bid price : 24.51
Bid-YTW : 5.01 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 41,583 Will reset 2014-12-31 to 3.266%
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-02
Maturity Price : 21.15
Evaluated at bid price : 21.15
Bid-YTW : 3.90 %
BMO.PR.S FixedReset 40,194 Nesbitt crossed 36,700 at 25.52.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-05-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.50
Bid-YTW : 3.55 %
TRP.PR.D FixedReset 36,067 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-02
Maturity Price : 23.31
Evaluated at bid price : 25.30
Bid-YTW : 3.65 %
BMO.PR.J Deemed-Retractible 30,335 Nesbitt crossed 25,600 at 25.79.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-01
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.75
Bid-YTW : -6.35 %
There were 36 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
GWO.PR.I Deemed-Retractible Quote: 23.20 – 23.68
Spot Rate : 0.4800
Average : 0.3165

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.20
Bid-YTW : 5.41 %

NEW.PR.D SplitShare Quote: 32.69 – 33.45
Spot Rate : 0.7600
Average : 0.6146

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-06-26
Maturity Price : 32.07
Evaluated at bid price : 32.69
Bid-YTW : 2.09 %

MFC.PR.H FixedReset Quote: 26.07 – 26.45
Spot Rate : 0.3800
Average : 0.2395

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.07
Bid-YTW : 2.58 %

MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible Quote: 23.21 – 23.50
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.2095

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.21
Bid-YTW : 5.43 %

FTS.PR.K FixedReset Quote: 24.77 – 25.00
Spot Rate : 0.2300
Average : 0.1686

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2044-12-02
Maturity Price : 23.14
Evaluated at bid price : 24.77
Bid-YTW : 3.46 %

PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.24 – 25.45
Spot Rate : 0.2100
Average : 0.1510

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.24
Bid-YTW : 4.54 %

A Trend in Pricing

December 2nd, 2014

As noted in MAPF Portfolio Composition: November 2014, this year’s trend for the fund to sell Straight Perpetuals to buy FixedResets continued and even accelerated during the month.

In addition, Assiduous Reader prefQC asked:

A question concerning fixed-reset DeemedRetractable MFC.PR.F:

Late 2013, as fears of imminently increasing interest rates were at a bit of a frenzy, MFC.PR.F fell to a new one-year low, recovering gradually in mid-January 2014 as fears of significant rate increases waned.

Now, as interest rates are in contrast falling to unexpected lows and the outlook for increasing interest rates is rather gloomy, MFC.PR.F appears to be on the way to testing those previous lows again.

What gives here? Of course we are one year closer to the June 2016 reset date with its modest reset spread, but other than that, the behavior of MFC.PR.F seems contradictory. Any ideas?

.

Therefore it is interesting to look at the price trend of some of these pairs. We’ll start with GWO.PR.N / GWO.PR.I; the fund sold the latter to buy the former at a takeout of about $1.00 in mid-June, 2014; relative prices over the past year are plotted as:

GWOPRN_GWOPRI_bidDiff_141128
Click for Big

Given that the current take-out is $2.27, this is clearly a trade that has not worked out very well.

In July, 2014, I reported sales of SLF.PR.D to purchase SLF.PR.G at a take-out of about $0.15:

SLFPRG_SLFPRD_bidDiff_141128
Click for Big

There were similar trades in August, 2014 (from SLF.PR.C) at a take-out of $0.35. The current take-out is $2.07, so that hasn’t worked very well either.

The trend paused in September, 2014 and, indeed, can be said to have reversed, with the fund selling SplitShares (PVS.PR.B at 25.25-30) to purchase PerpetualDiscounts (BAM.PR.M / BAM.PR.N at about 21.25), a trade which worked out favourably and has been sort-of reversed (into PVS.PR.D) in November 2014.

In October 2014 there was another bit of counterflow, as the fund sold more SplitShares (CGI.PR.D at about 25.25) to purchase more PerpetualDiscounts (CU.PR.F and CU.PR.G, at about 21.25) which again worked out well and was reversed in November, selling the CU issues at about 22.45 to purchase low-spread FixedResets (TRP.PR.A and TRP.PR.B) at about 21.50 and 18.75 (post dividend equivalent), which was basically down by transaction costs at month-end.

And November saw the third insurer-based sector swap, as the fund sold MFC.PR.C to buy the FixedReset MFC.PR.F at a post-dividend-adjusted take-out of about $0.85 … given a month-end take-out of about $1.30, that’s another regrettable trade.

MFCPRF_MFCPRC_bidDiff_141128
Click for Big

This trend is not restricted to the insurance sector. Other pairs of interest are BAM.PR.X / BAM.PR.M:

BAMPRX_BAMPRN_bidDiff_141128
Click for Big

… and FTS.PR.H / FTS.PR.J:

FTSPRH_FTSPRJ_bidDiff_141128
Click for Big

… and PWF.PR.P / PWF.PR.S:

PWFPRP_PWFPRS_bidDiff_141128
Click for Big

I will agree that the fund’s trades highlighted in this post may be decried as cases of monumental bad timing, but I should point out that in May, 2014, the fund was 63.9% Straight / 9.5% FixedReset
while in November 2014 the fund was 42.6% Straight / 39.0% FixedReset. Given that the indices are roughly 30% Straight / 60% FixedReset, it is apparent that the fund was extremely overweighted in Straights / underweighted in FixedResets in May 2014 and that this qualitative tilt remains – just not quite so extreme.

Summarizing the charts above in tabular form, we see:

FixedReset Straight Take-out
November 2013
Take-out
MAPF Trade
Take-out
November 2014
GWO.PR.N
3.65%+130
GWO.PR.I
4.5%
$0.17 $1.00 $2.27
SLF.PR.G
4.35%+141
SLF.PR.D
4.45%
($1.43) $0.25 $2.07
MFC.PR.F
4.20%+141
MFC.PR.C
4.50%
($1.07) $0.86 $1.30
BAM.PR.X
4.60%+180
BAM.PR.M
4.75%
($2.81)   $0.35
FTS.PR.H
4.25%+145
FTS.PR.J
4.75%
$1.35   $3.91
PWF.PR.P
4.40%+160
PWF.PR.S
4.80%
($1.26)   $2.09
The ‘Take-Out’ is the bid price of the Straight less the bid price of the FixedReset; approximate execution prices are used for the “MAPF Trade” column. Bracketted figures in the ‘Take-Out’ columns indicate a ‘Pay-Up’

So why is all this happening? One should take care in explaining market movements, but it is my belief that in the latter half of 2013 we were dealing with the ‘taper tantrum’ – the market’s fears that Fed tapering and subsequent tapering would lead to massive spikes in yields; this led to a great preference for FixedResets over Straights. Now, with the economic news getting less inflationary with every news story and Europe and Japan desperately trying to reflate their sluggish economies, the market seems to think that these rate increases are still a long way off … leading to a great preference for Straights over FixedResets.