LBS.PR.A to Reset at 4.75%

October 4th, 2013

Reset? Well, I couldn’t think of another word to use!

Brompton Funds announced in April that the term would be extended and the dividend changed on November 29; they announced the new rate on August 14:

At a special meeting held on April 11, 2013, shareholders of Life & Banc Split Corp. (“LBS” or the “Fund”) approved a special resolution to allow the Board of Directors to extend the term of the Class A Shares and the Preferred Shares for up to 5 years and to determine the distribution ratesfor the extended term. The Board of Directors is pleased to announce that it has approved a 5 year extension to the term of the Class A Shares and Preferred Shares to November 29, 2018. The Fund was originally scheduledto terminate on November 29, 2013. The distribution rate for the Fund’s Preferred Shares for this new 5 year term which commences on November 30, 2013 will be $0.475 per annum paid in equal quarterly amounts. The new Preferred Share distribution rate is based on current market rates for preferred shares with similar terms. The Preferred Share distribution for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 is expected to be $0.12690 per Preferred Share which takes into account the new distribution rate for December and the previous distribution rate for October and November. In addition, the Fund intends to maintain the targeted monthly Class A Share distribution at $0.10 per Class A Share.

LBS invests in a portfolio, on an approximately equal weight basis, of common shares of 6 Canadian Banks: Bank of Montreal, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, National Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Canada, The Bank of Nova Scotia and The Toronto-Dominion Bank and 4 Canadian life insurance companies: Great-West Lifeco Inc., Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc., Manulife Financial Corporation and Sun Life Financial Inc. The extension of the term of the Fund is not a taxable event and enables shareholders to defer potential capital gains tax liability that would have otherwise been realized on the redemption of the Class A Shares or Preferred Shares until such time as such shares are disposed of by shareholders.

In connection with the extension, those shareholders who do not wish to continue their investment in the Fund and do not wish to sell their shares through the TSX, may retract their Preferred Shares or Class A Shares on November 29, 2013 pursuant to a special retraction right and receive a retraction price that is calculated in the same way that such price would be calculated if the Fund were to terminate on November 29, 2013. Such retraction price will be approximately equal to the net asset value per share less certain costs including trading commissions. The notice expiry for the special retraction is October 31, 2013 at 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time). Shareholders are reminded that Class A Shares and Preferred Shares have traded at an average premium to net asset value of 8.7% and 1.2%,respectively, over the past 12 months to July 31.

The new rate of 4.75% represents a modest decline from the previous rate of 5.25%.

LBS.PR.A currently has asset coverage of 1.8-:1 and income coverage of 100%. The reduced dividend on the preferreds will move income coverage over the 100% mark.

I recommend that holders retain their shares.

October 3, 2013

October 3rd, 2013

There is increasing awareness that the economy is not all that great:

Bank of Nova Scotia economists are now raising the possibility of no move in the Bank of Canada’s benchmark interest rate until 2016.

Other observers have speculated on late next year or early in 2015 for the first rate hike by the central bank.

But Scotiabank’s Derek Holt, Mary Webb and Dov Zigler say the Bank of Canada is now signalling a hold of more than two years, citing signs in a recent speech by senior deputy governor Tiff Macklem, among other things.

“The BoC probably now envisages spare capacity remaining into 2016,” the Scotiabank economists said, adding the central bank now projects hitting its 2-per-cent target for annual inflation in mid-2015.

They believe the Bank of Canada may change that forecast, to an even later date, when meets later this month and also issues its monetary policy report.

But that’s OK! We’ll all retire on the CPP:

A proposal to boost the retirement benefits for the middle class from the Canada Pension Plan through increases in contributions is rekindling momentum for pension reform ahead of a key December meeting with Finance Minister Jim Flaherty.

Prince Edward Island Finance Minister Wes Sheridan is trying to rally his colleagues around changes that would see the maximum CPP contribution rise to $4,681.20 a year from $2,356.20 starting in 2016, and the maximum annual benefit would increase to $23,400 from $12,150.

Qualifying for the maximum benefit would take an income of $102,000, up sharply from the current maximum insurable earnings cutoff of $51,000. The overall goal is to boost the savings rates of middle-income Canadians who earn less than six figures.

And – surprise! – middle-class jobs are scarce:

The top-10 list suggests there are really two sets of expanding job opportunities, at either end of the income spectrum – and not much in the middle.

If you’re entering the labour market – say you’re young, or you’re a newcomer to Canada – there are lots of points of entry at the low end of the scale. But they are not generally the types of jobs that lead you down a career path to something better, nor do these jobs fully employ many workers’ skill sets. If you are lucky enough to find full-time, full-year work in these types of jobs, paying $13 an hour or less, you would be making $26,000 a year before taxes, or less.

There is another cluster of job opportunities that pay median wages of $35 an hour or more, which translates to $70,000 a year before taxes, or more.

There are fewer opportunities in the middle, jobs that pay in the $20-something per hour range.

However, a bright note is that European distressed assets seem to have found a level:

Blackstone Group LP (BX) raised more than $4 billion in 2009 to buy European property assets anticipating that cash-strapped banks would be forced to sell as the region’s debt crisis worsened. Almost all of it sat idle for two years.

Today, the inaction has given way to a surge of deals, as lenders from Lloyds Banking Group Plc (LLOY) to Commerzbank AG (CBK) cut loose soured real estate, corporate and consumer loans. Sales of loan portfolios and other unwanted assets by European Union banks could reach 60 billion euros ($82 billion) in face value this year, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the most since the firm began tracking data in 2010.

Apollo is among the most active investors, amassing loans with a face value of about 12 billion euros, including 11,000 mortgages in the U.K. Blackstone, the world’s largest alternative-asset manager, last year put $3.5 billion into distressed European mortgages and properties, the most its real estate group has plowed into the region in one year.
Investors also are buying European properties from real estate developers and taking over troubled companies or lending directly to them where banks have scaled back.
EU banks unloaded 29 billion euros of portfolio loans and assets such as mortgage-servicing units and branches in the first half of 2013, according to Richard Thompson, a partner at PwC in London. That compares with sales of 46 billion euros for all of last year, 36 billion euros in 2011 and 11 billion euros in 2010. The majority of sales have been distressed loans, Thompson said.

The arbitrary nature of corporate bond pricing (and hence the opportunity for profit) is well illustrated by this tale of woe:

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) mistakenly added about $1.5 million of interest costs to a Ford Motor Co. (F) bond sale last week by using the wrong Treasury note as a benchmark for the security, according to two people with knowledge of the transaction.

Typically, banks set the price of new corporate securities by using Treasury bonds with similar maturities. If the U.S. government issues notes in the middle of the week, underwriters don’t use that security as a benchmark until the following Monday.

For Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford’s Sept. 26 offering, Goldman Sachs added a 1.45 percentage-point spread to the 1.375 percent Treasury note due September 2018 that was auctioned on Sept. 25, Bloomberg data show. Instead, the bonds should have been based off the 1.5 percent security that matures in August 2018.

Matthew Klein of Bloomberg offers an excellent perspective on endowment investing:

The modern style of institutional investing can be traced to Yale University’s David Swensen, who literally wrote the book on the subject. … Three core ideas inform his thinking.

1. Savers are paid to take risk. If you want to generate big returns you have to be willing to endure large losses at any point.

2. Universities and other institutional investors have long time horizons because they expect to exist forever. This makes them different from regular people who save for retirement.

3. Contrary to standard academic theory, which suggests that savers should invest in broad indexes and avoid fees, market imperfections create opportunities for talented money managers. They can improve a portfolio’s performance through a combination of high returns and diversification benefits.

The potential for a mismatch between assets and liabilities is one big problem with the Yale model. Another is the focus on hunting for the best hedge funds, private-equity managers and stock pickers. This is where most of the money is made (and lost) in the endowment business. According to the Yale endowment’s most recent report, “nearly 80 percent of Yale’s outperformance relative to the average Cambridge Associates endowment was attributable to the value added by Yale’s active managers, while only 20 percent was the result of Yale’s asset allocation.” That’s great for Yale, but it’s impossible for every institution to have the best managers.

In general, I think Mr. Klein overstates the need for liquidity – it’s important, but my views are closer to precept 2 than that which he espouses.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the Yale model, but there are definitely problems with the implementation – as I told one guy recently, just because I believe the “Warren Buffet style” of investment CAN work, doesn’t mean I think YOU can do it.

The field is filled with ignoramuses and charlatans and institutional boards aren’t any better at picking winners than any other retail investor who handles his investments as a part-time job. Hiring a small group of specialists to farm out the work to third party firms just makes matters worse, because then allocations are made on the basis of two salesmen talking to each other.

For an institution to outperform, I believe that you have to have most, if not all, of the investment expertise in-house. ‘You don’t need to sell anything, guys, you just have to outperform on a rolling four year basis or you’re fired.’ This is the Teachers/OMERS model – and it works.

Canajans, eh? The Bank of Canada has published a working paper by Mikael Khan, Louis Morel and Patrick Sabourin titled The Common Component of CPI:An Alternative Measure of Underlying Inflation for Canada, in which the authors use factor analysis to find a common factor among 54 different components of the Consumer Price Index.


Click for Big

But, you ask, which of these 54 series was best correlated with this single underlying factor? Well, I’m glad you asked that question:

Table 2. Relationship between common component and individual components of the CPI

CPI components (y/y) Correlation % of explained variance
Alcoholic beverages served in licensed establishments 0.86 0.74

This suggests a new currency ….

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts getting whacked for 40bp, FixedResets off 3bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 4bp. Predictably, the Performance Highlights table is heavily populated by losing PerpetualDiscounts. Volume was slightly above average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.3151 % 2,525.5
FixedFloater 4.40 % 3.70 % 31,995 17.86 1 -1.3692 % 3,777.3
Floater 2.68 % 2.91 % 65,975 19.98 5 -0.3151 % 2,726.9
OpRet 4.64 % 2.96 % 60,751 0.48 3 -0.0901 % 2,632.7
SplitShare 4.76 % 5.07 % 60,910 4.03 6 -0.0622 % 2,946.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0901 % 2,407.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.76 % 1.77 % 111,776 0.12 8 -0.0644 % 2,276.8
Perpetual-Discount 5.53 % 5.56 % 147,151 14.38 30 -0.4041 % 2,346.9
FixedReset 4.93 % 3.68 % 238,684 3.62 85 -0.0261 % 2,457.8
Deemed-Retractible 5.12 % 4.43 % 197,492 6.89 43 0.0438 % 2,381.9
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
CIU.PR.C FixedReset -3.98 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 20.74
Evaluated at bid price : 20.74
Bid-YTW : 4.03 %
BAM.PF.D Perpetual-Discount -1.57 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 20.71
Evaluated at bid price : 20.71
Bid-YTW : 5.96 %
BAM.PF.C Perpetual-Discount -1.44 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 19.80
Evaluated at bid price : 19.80
Bid-YTW : 6.17 %
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater -1.37 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 21.93
Evaluated at bid price : 21.61
Bid-YTW : 3.70 %
CU.PR.F Perpetual-Discount -1.33 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 21.50
Evaluated at bid price : 21.50
Bid-YTW : 5.30 %
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount -1.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 23.31
Evaluated at bid price : 23.61
Bid-YTW : 5.23 %
CU.PR.G Perpetual-Discount -1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 21.37
Evaluated at bid price : 21.37
Bid-YTW : 5.33 %
FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount -1.27 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 23.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.30
Bid-YTW : 5.14 %
BAM.PR.M Perpetual-Discount -1.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 19.75
Evaluated at bid price : 19.75
Bid-YTW : 6.06 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset 1.47 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.49
Bid-YTW : 4.15 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TRP.PR.D FixedReset 91,600 Nesbitt crossed 75,000 at 24.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 23.02
Evaluated at bid price : 24.70
Bid-YTW : 4.12 %
TD.PR.Y FixedReset 68,305 To reset 10/31 at 3.5595%.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.14
Bid-YTW : 3.61 %
TD.PR.T FixedReset 63,782 Scotia crossed 50,000 at 25.31.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.32
Bid-YTW : 2.28 %
IFC.PR.A FixedReset 63,200 Scotia sold 21,600 to RBC at 24.55 and another 10,000 to Anonymous at the same price. RBC crossed 19,700 at the same price again.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.55
Bid-YTW : 4.08 %
BAM.PR.M Perpetual-Discount 39,904 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 19.75
Evaluated at bid price : 19.75
Bid-YTW : 6.06 %
BAM.PR.R FixedReset 39,592 Scotia crossed 25,000 at 25.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 23.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.21
Bid-YTW : 4.21 %
There were 37 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
RY.PR.B Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.29 – 25.77
Spot Rate : 0.4800
Average : 0.3265

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-08-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.29
Bid-YTW : 4.37 %

TCA.PR.Y Perpetual-Discount Quote: 50.00 – 50.40
Spot Rate : 0.4000
Average : 0.2505

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-05
Maturity Price : 50.00
Evaluated at bid price : 50.00
Bid-YTW : 4.53 %

MFC.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 25.53 – 25.86
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2089

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-12-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.53
Bid-YTW : 3.77 %

TRP.PR.B FixedReset Quote: 20.13 – 20.50
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2530

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-03
Maturity Price : 20.13
Evaluated at bid price : 20.13
Bid-YTW : 4.02 %

HSB.PR.C Deemed-Retractible Quote: 24.90 – 25.34
Spot Rate : 0.4400
Average : 0.3314

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.90
Bid-YTW : 5.20 %

GWO.PR.Q Deemed-Retractible Quote: 23.61 – 23.87
Spot Rate : 0.2600
Average : 0.1627

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.61
Bid-YTW : 5.87 %

October 2, 2013

October 2nd, 2013

SEC Chair Mary Jo White gave a speech titled Focusing on Fundamentals: The Path to Address Equity Market Structure. All the usual blather, but there was one point of interest:

So, today, I am pleased to announce a new initiative we are launching that is designed to promote a fuller empirical understanding of the equity markets. SEC staff has prepared and assembled resources and data on the SEC’s web site focusing exclusively on equity market structure. The new web site should be available as early as next week and will serve as a central location for us to publicly share evolving data, research, and analysis.

Part of this initiative will be to disseminate data and related observations drawn from MIDAS that address the nature and quality of displayed liquidity across the full range of U.S.-listed equities –from the life-time of quotes, to the speed of the market, to the nature of order cancellations.

The new web site will also feature staff research papers based on a variety of data sources and staff reviews that identify and assemble information from the expanding economic literature on market structure topics. One paper, using order audit trail data on off-exchange trading, provides key metrics describing the underlying nature of off-exchange trading by the 44 alternative trading systems that trade equity securities. The staff’s primary observation is that ATS trading looks very similar in many respects to exchange trading.[20] Another paper summarizes current studies that address market fragmentation – both visible and dark. Additional research papers and reviews are already planned.

Maneuvering over the US debt limit continues:

Lew and President Barack Obama have said they won’t negotiate on the limit, which is tied to obligations the U.S. has already incurred. Boehner, an Ohio Republican, has issued a list of demands before he’ll support raising the ceiling. His conditions include approval of TransCanada Corp. (TRP)’s Keystone XL pipeline, major revisions to the tax code and a one-year delay of the insurance mandate in the Obama health-care law.

The U.S. government is already limited in action after Republicans and Democrats in Congress failed to agree on funding for the new fiscal year that began yesterday. That led to a partial shutdown of the government at midnight, forcing about 800,000 federal workers off the job. The shutdown could cost the economy as much as $10 billion a week, the White House said on its website.

DS is having a good year with US junk:

Royal Bank of Canada is on pace to join the ranks of the 10 largest underwriters of high-yield debt in the U.S. for the first time as the largest Canadian lender seeks profits abroad with issuance slowing at home.

Royal Bank’s RBC Capital Markets ranks 10th among arrangers of speculative-grade bonds at the end of the third quarter after luring bankers from firms including Deutsche Bank AG (DBK) and Credit Suisse Group AG. (CSGN) The Toronto-based firm has never been a top-10 underwriter for non-investment-grade debt in the U.S. on any given year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

While RBC expects total sales of junk bonds in the U.S. market to surpass last year’s record $353 billion, on Sept. 4 it cut its annual forecast for Canadian issuance to as little as C$4 billion ($3.9 billion) from about C$6 billion. The firm boosted the headcount in its U.S. credit team by 15 percent in the past two years, hiring almost 20 people, including 10 sales staff and eight traders. Last month Neil Yaris, who has held jobs at Credit Suisse and Bank of America Corp., joined as co-head of high-yield debt trading.

Royal Bank’s long-standing goal to be a Top 10 investment bank in the U.S. contrasts with retrenchment in other areas of banking. The company sold its unprofitable U.S. lender RBC Bank to PNC Financial Services Group Inc. in March 2012, ending an unsuccessful decade-long foray into U.S. retail banking.

In Canada, RBC slipped to the third spot among underwriters of high-yield debt, from No. 1 in 2012. Still, the firm has led arrangers of investment-grade company bonds in Canada for at least 14 years.

I’m in the wrong business:

Carnegie Hall employs five full-time stagehands and uses part-timers as needed, a spokeswoman, Synneve Carlino, said in an e-mail.

The full-timers earned an average of $420,000 in 2011, according to the tax return. They move equipment in and out of the building and prepare three stages for performances, while operating audiovisual and other equipment. They work on holidays and weekends.

Oh, they work on holidays and weekends. Well, I’m glad that’s cleared up.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts down 15bp, FixedResets gaining 7bp and DeemedRetractibles off 2bp. The Performance Highlights table is average sized – by standards of the last few months – with BAM issues notable on the downside. Volume was average.

PerpetualDiscounts yield 5.56%, equivalent to 7.23% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long Corporates now yield about 4.8%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 245bp, a significant increase from the 235bp reported September 25, as long corporate yields have declined about 10bp on the week, while PerpetualDiscounts haven’t done much of anything.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0508 % 2,533.5
FixedFloater 4.34 % 3.65 % 32,045 17.99 1 -1.0835 % 3,829.7
Floater 2.67 % 2.89 % 65,657 20.03 5 -0.0508 % 2,735.5
OpRet 4.63 % 2.78 % 61,624 0.49 3 -0.1028 % 2,635.1
SplitShare 4.76 % 4.97 % 60,900 4.03 6 0.1024 % 2,948.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1028 % 2,409.5
Perpetual-Premium 5.76 % 3.04 % 112,395 0.12 8 -0.0520 % 2,278.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.51 % 5.56 % 145,987 14.44 30 -0.1529 % 2,356.4
FixedReset 4.93 % 3.68 % 235,270 3.65 85 0.0736 % 2,458.4
Deemed-Retractible 5.12 % 4.42 % 198,981 6.75 43 -0.0171 % 2,380.8
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater -1.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.36
Evaluated at bid price : 21.91
Bid-YTW : 3.65 %
BAM.PF.D Perpetual-Discount -1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 21.04
Evaluated at bid price : 21.04
Bid-YTW : 5.87 %
BAM.PR.B Floater -1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 18.21
Evaluated at bid price : 18.21
Bid-YTW : 2.89 %
FTS.PR.G FixedReset -1.02 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.45
Evaluated at bid price : 23.31
Bid-YTW : 4.24 %
CIU.PR.C FixedReset -1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 21.30
Evaluated at bid price : 21.60
Bid-YTW : 3.84 %
MFC.PR.F FixedReset 1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.58
Bid-YTW : 4.68 %
TRI.PR.B Floater 1.18 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 21.35
Evaluated at bid price : 21.35
Bid-YTW : 2.47 %
HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 1.62 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.05
Bid-YTW : 4.89 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
ENB.PR.T FixedReset 87,816 TD crossed 25,000 at 24.10; Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.75
Evaluated at bid price : 24.01
Bid-YTW : 4.40 %
TRP.PR.D FixedReset 73,493 RBC crossed 56,500 at 24.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 23.04
Evaluated at bid price : 24.75
Bid-YTW : 4.11 %
BAM.PF.A FixedReset 58,449 Scotia crossed 45,000 at 24.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 23.11
Evaluated at bid price : 24.85
Bid-YTW : 4.65 %
HSE.PR.A FixedReset 58,356 Desjardins crossed 45,000 at 23.28.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.66
Evaluated at bid price : 23.25
Bid-YTW : 3.97 %
TD.PR.Y FixedReset 52,125 Will reset 2013-10-31 at 3.5595%.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.15
Bid-YTW : 3.61 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 43,235 Desjardins crossed 30,000 at 23.33.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.66
Evaluated at bid price : 23.21
Bid-YTW : 3.75 %
There were 32 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
TD.PR.T FixedReset Quote: 25.31 – 26.59
Spot Rate : 1.2800
Average : 0.7157

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.31
Bid-YTW : 2.29 %

BAM.PR.G FixedFloater Quote: 21.91 – 23.12
Spot Rate : 1.2100
Average : 0.8050

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.36
Evaluated at bid price : 21.91
Bid-YTW : 3.65 %

TRP.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 23.21 – 23.64
Spot Rate : 0.4300
Average : 0.3076

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.66
Evaluated at bid price : 23.21
Bid-YTW : 3.75 %

ENB.PR.Y FixedReset Quote: 23.90 – 24.19
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1833

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.69
Evaluated at bid price : 23.90
Bid-YTW : 4.33 %

PWF.PR.K Perpetual-Discount Quote: 22.66 – 22.99
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2275

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.24
Evaluated at bid price : 22.66
Bid-YTW : 5.54 %

ELF.PR.G Perpetual-Discount Quote: 20.91 – 21.28
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2922

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 20.91
Evaluated at bid price : 20.91
Bid-YTW : 5.70 %

PPL.PR.C Weak On Reasonable Volume

October 2nd, 2013

Pembina Pipeline Corporation has announced:

that it has closed its previously announced public offering of 6,000,000 cumulative redeemable rate reset class A preferred shares, series 3 (the “Series 3 Preferred Shares”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $150 million (the “Offering”).

The Offering was first announced on September 23, 2013 when Pembina entered into an agreement with a syndicate of underwriters led by RBC Capital Markets and Scotiabank.

Proceeds from the Offering will be used to partially fund capital projects, to reduce short-term indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes of the Company and its affiliates.

The Series 3 Preferred Shares will begin trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange today under the symbol PPL.PR.C.

PPL.PR.C is a FixedReset, 4.70%+260 announced September 23. It will be tracked by HIMIPref™ but relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

The issue traded 232,472 shares today in a range of 24.44-54 before closing at 24.45-50, 16×22. Vital statistics are:

PPL.PR.C FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-02
Maturity Price : 22.94
Evaluated at bid price : 24.45
Bid-YTW : 4.57 %

MAPF Portfolio Composition: September 2013

October 2nd, 2013

Turnover remained reasonable in September, at about 9%.

There is extreme segmentation in the marketplace, with OSFI’s NVCC rule changes in February 2011 having had the effect of splitting the formerly relatively homogeneous Straight Perpetual class of preferreds into three parts:

  • Unaffected Straight Perpetuals
  • DeemedRetractibles explicitly subject to the rules (banks)
  • DeemedRetractibles considered by me, but not (yet!) by the market, to be likely to be explicitly subject to the rules in the future (insurers and insurance holding companies)

This segmentation, and the extreme valuation differences between the segments, has cut down markedly on the opportunities for trading. Another trend that hasn’t helped was the migration of PerpetualDiscounts into PerpetualPremiums (due to price increases) earlier in the year – many of the PerpetualPremiums had negative Yields-to-Worst and those that don’t aren’t particularly thrilling; speaking very generally, PerpetualPremiums are to be avoided, not traded! This effect has caused the first of the three segments noted above to be untradeable for most practical purposes. The recent downdraft has reversed the trend and resulted in a large pool of PerpetualDiscounts, but due to their long term they are still, as a class, inferior to DeemedRetractibles.

To make this more clear, it used to be that there were 70-odd Straight Perpetuals and I was more or less indifferent as to which ones I owned (subject, of course, to issuer concentration concerns and other risk management factors). Thus, if any one of these 70 were to go down in price by – say – $0.25, I would quite often have something in inventory that I’d be willing to swap for it. The segmentation means that I am no longer indifferent; in addition to checking the valuation of a potential buy to its peers, I also have to check its peer group. This cuts down on the potential for trading.

There is no real hope that this situation will be corrected in the near-term. OSFI has indicated that the long-promised “Draft Definition of Capital” for insurers will not be issued “for public consultation in late 2012 or early 2013”, as they fear that it might encourage speculation in the marketplace. It is not clear why OSFI is so afraid of informed speculation, since the constant speculation in the marketplace is currently less informed than it would be with a little bit of regulatory clarity.

As a result of this delay, I have extended the Deemed Maturity date for insurers and insurance holding companies by three years (to 2025-1-31), in the expectation that when OSFI finally does provide clarity, they will allow the same degree of lead-in time for these companies as they did for banks. This has obviously had a major effect on the durations of preferred shares subject to the change but, fortunately, not much on their calculated yields as most of these issues are either trading near par or were trading at sufficient premium that a par call was expected on economic grounds. However, with the declines in the market over the past two months, the expected capital gain on redemption of the insurance-issued DeemedRetractibles has become an important component of the calculated yield.

Sectoral distribution of the MAPF portfolio on September 30 was as follows:

MAPF Sectoral Analysis 2013-9-30
HIMI Indices Sector Weighting YTW ModDur
Ratchet 0% N/A N/A
FixFloat 0% N/A N/A
Floater 0% N/A N/A
OpRet 0% N/A N/A
SplitShare 18.4% (-0.6) 4.91% 6.21
Interest Rearing 0% N/A N/A
PerpetualPremium 0.0% (0) N/A N/A
PerpetualDiscount 9.6% (+5.4) 5.30% 14.98
Fixed-Reset 8.1% (-4.8) 3.75% 5.56
Deemed-Retractible 54.1% (+0.7) 6.09% 8.54
Scraps (Various) 9.3% (-0.5) 6.51% 12.79
Cash +0.4% (-0.2) 0.00% 0.00
Total 100% 5.62% 8.85
Totals and changes will not add precisely due to rounding. Bracketted figures represent change from August month-end. Cash is included in totals with duration and yield both equal to zero.
DeemedRetractibles are comprised of all Straight Perpetuals (both PerpetualDiscount and PerpetualPremium) issued by BMO, BNS, CM, ELF, GWO, HSB, IAG, MFC, NA, RY, SLF and TD, which are not exchangable into common at the option of the company. These issues are analyzed as if their prospectuses included a requirement to redeem at par on or prior to 2022-1-31 (banks) or 2025-1-3 (insurers and insurance holding companies), in addition to the call schedule explicitly defined. See OSFI Does Not Grandfather Extant Tier 1 Capital, CM.PR.D, CM.PR.E, CM.PR.G: NVCC Status Confirmed and the January, February, March and June, 2011, editions of PrefLetter for the rationale behind this analysis. (all recent editions have a short summary of the argument included in the “DeemedRetractible” section)

Note that the estimate for the time this will become effective for insurers and insurance holding companies was extended by three years in April 2013, due to the delays in OSFI’s providing clarity on the issue.

The “total” reflects the un-leveraged total portfolio (i.e., cash is included in the portfolio calculations and is deemed to have a duration and yield of 0.00.). MAPF will often have relatively large cash balances, both credit and debit, to facilitate trading. Figures presented in the table have been rounded to the indicated precision.

Credit distribution is:

MAPF Credit Analysis 2013-9-30
DBRS Rating Weighting
Pfd-1 0 (0)
Pfd-1(low) 36.0% (+0.9)
Pfd-2(high) 42.2% (+6.2)
Pfd-2 2.2% (-6.3)
Pfd-2(low) 9.9% (-0.2)
Pfd-3(high) 1.0% (0)
Pfd-3 4.7% (-0.1)
Pfd-3(low) 1.6% (-0.2)
Pfd-4(high) 0% (0)
Pfd-4 0% (0)
Pfd-4(low) 0.8% (0)
Pfd-5(high) 1.2% (-0.1)
Cash 0.4% (-0.2)
Totals will not add precisely due to rounding. Bracketted figures represent change from August month-end.
A position held in NPI.PR.A is not rated by DBRS, but has been included as “Pfd-3” in the above table on the basis of its S&P rating of P-3.

Changes in sectoral distribution and credit quality were driven largely by the swap of most of the position held in HSB.PR.E (FixedReset, Pfd-2) to purchase CU.PR.F and CU.PR.G (PerpetualDiscount, Pfd-2(high).

Liquidity Distribution is:

MAPF Liquidity Analysis 2013-9-30
Average Daily Trading Weighting
<$50,000 0.6% (+0.6)
$50,000 – $100,000 16.7% (-0.6)
$100,000 – $200,000 28.4% (-3.3)
$200,000 – $300,000 42.7% (+7.2)
>$300,000 11.1% (-3.9)
Cash 0.4% (-0.2)
Totals will not add precisely due to rounding. Bracketted figures represent change from August month-end.

MAPF is, of course, Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund, a “unit trust” managed by Hymas Investment Management Inc. Further information and links to performance, audited financials and subscription information are available the fund’s web page. The fund may be purchased either directly from Hymas Investment Management or through a brokerage account at Odlum Brown Limited. A “unit trust” is like a regular mutual fund, but is sold by offering memorandum rather than prospectus. This is cheaper, but means subscription is restricted to “accredited investors” (as defined by the Ontario Securities Commission) or those who subscribe for $150,000+. Fund past performances are not a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in MAPF or any other fund.

A similar portfolio composition analysis has been performed on the Claymore Preferred Share ETF (symbol CPD) (and other funds) as of August 31, 2012, and published in the October (mainly methodology), November (most funds), and December (ZPR) 2012, PrefLetter. While direct comparisons are difficult due to the introduction of the DeemedRetractible class of preferred share (see above) it is fair to say:

  • MAPF credit quality is better
  • MAPF liquidity is a lower
  • MAPF Yield is higher
  • Weightings in
    • MAPF is much more exposed to DeemedRetractibles
    • MAPF is much less exposed to Operating Retractibles
    • MAPF is much more exposed to SplitShares
    • MAPF is less exposed to FixFloat / Floater / Ratchet
    • MAPF weighting in FixedResets is much lower

New Issue: Prime US Banking Sector Split Corp.

October 2nd, 2013

Quadravest has announced:

Prime U.S. Banking Sector Split Corp. (“The Company”) is pleased to announce the filing of a preliminary prospectus dated September 30, 2013 for a proposed new offering. The offering is an investment in common shares of a portfolio consisting primarily of 15 U.S. financial services companies selected from a portfolio universe consisting of 20 companies. The Company will offer two investment choices: Priority Equity Shares at $10 per share and Class A shares at $10 per share.

The Company’s Priority Equity Shares will provide holders with monthly cumulative preferential floating rate cash dividends at an annual rate of U.S. prime plus 1.75% (Min: 5.0% / Max: 7.0%) based on the original issue price.

The Company’s Class A Shares offer regular monthly cash dividends initially targeted to be 6.5% per annum based on the original issue price. The Class A shares will be entitled on redemption to the benefit of any capital appreciation in the market price of the shares in the portfolio.

The Company has been created to provide investors with an opportunity to invest in a portfolio of 15 U.S. financial services companies whose shares will likely continue to benefit from an improving economy. The Company will employ a covered call writing strategy to generate additional income to the portfolio.

The 15 portfolio companies will be selected from a portfolio universe consisting of the following 20 companies:

American Express Company City National Corporation Northern Trust Corporation
Bank of America Corporation Fifth Third Bancorp The PNC Financial Services Group Inc.
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Regions Financial Corporation
BB&T Corporation JPMorgan Chase & Co. State Street Corporation
Capital One Financial Corp. KeyCorp. SunTrust Banks Inc.
Citigroup Inc. M&T Bank Corporation U.S. Bancorp
Morgan Stanley Wells Fargo & Company

The proposed offering is co-lead by RBC Capital Markets and CIBC World Markets Inc. The other members of the syndicate are BMO Capital Markets, National Bank Financial Inc., Scotiabank, TD Securities Inc., GMP Securities L.P., Raymond James Ltd., Canaccord Genuity Corp., Desjardins Securities Inc. and Mackie Research Capital Corporation.

Please visit our website at: www.primeusbanking.com

According to the preliminary prospectus:

The Shares will be redeemed by the Company in connection with its termination, scheduled to be on or about December 1, 2020, subject to the right of the Board of Directors of the Company, on the advice of Quadravest, to extend the termination date for further terms of five years each (the day the Company terminates being the “Termination Date”). The Company may also be terminated and the Shares redeemed prior to the Termination Date in certain circumstances. See “Termination of the Company”.

There is a NAV Test:

No regular monthly dividends will be paid on the Class A Shares in any month as long as any dividends on the Priority Equity Shares are then in arrears or so long as the net asset value per Unit is equal to or less than $15.00. Additionally, it is currently intended that no special year-end dividends will be paid if after payment of such a dividend the net asset value per Unit would be less than $20.00.

There is annual and monthly retractibility:

Shareholders retracting Shares on an Annual Retraction Date will be entitled to receive a retraction price per Share equal to the net asset value per Unit on the Annual Retraction Date, less any costs associated with the retraction including commissions and other such costs, if any, related to the liquidation of any portion of the Portfolio required to fund such retraction.

Except as noted below, holders of Priority Equity Shares whose shares are surrendered for [monthly] retraction will be entitled to receive a price per share (the “Priority Equity Share Retraction Price”) equal to the lesser of (i) $10.00 and (ii) 96% of the net asset value per Unit determined as of the Retraction Date, less in either case the cost to the Company of the purchase of a Class A Share in the market for cancellation and less any other applicable costs.

The Management Expense Ratio looks like it will be somewhere around 1.50%:

Quadravest is entitled to a management fee at an annual rate equal to 0.75% of the Company’s net asset value calculated as at the last Valuation Date in each month, plus an amount equal to the service fee (the “Service Fee”) payable to dealers, together with applicable taxes. Quadravest will pay the Service Fee to each registered dealer whose clients hold Shares. The Service Fee will be calculated and paid at the end of each calendar quarter and will be equal to 0.50% annually of the value of the Class A Shares held by clients of the dealer, plus applicable taxes. For these purposes, the value of a Class A Share at any time is the net asset value per Unit at such time less $10.00. No Service Fee will be paid in any calendar quarter if regular dividends are not paid to holders of Class A Shares in respect of each month of such calendar quarter.

The Company will pay for all other expenses incurred in connection with the operation and administration of the Company, estimated to be approximately $300,000 per annum.

Income coverage will be a major problem:

Based on the current dividends paid by the companies in the Portfolio Universe, the Company is initially expected to generate dividend income, net of withholding tax, of approximately 1.53% per annum. The Company would be required to generate an additional return, net of withholding tax, of approximately 6.0% per annum, including from dividend growth, capital appreciation and option premiums from the Portfolio, in order for the Company to pay these initial targeted distributions and maintain a stable net asset value.

Those who have read some of my writings about Split Share Credit Quality will understand the combined effects of cash shortfalls and portfolio volatility. It’s not pretty!

As usual, a lot of space is used up blathering about the ever so wonderful covered call writing strategy. I have never seen any Split Share Corporation publish any evidence that such a strategy has amounted to a row of beans. I find it rather amusing that they present earnest calculations of “Required Call Writing at Various Volatility Levels to Achieve Target Distribution”, without taking into account the idea that Black-Scholes specifies the fair price; i.e., any option premium earned may be assumed to be offset by capital gains foregone. But there’s one born every minute ….

This issue will not be tracked by HIMIPref™; the dependence upon the US Prime Rate means there are insufficient comparables.

Update, 2013-10-28: I understand that the new issue has been withdrawn. However, there is no confirmation of this as yet on the Quadravest website, the fund’s website or SEDAR.

October 1, 2013

October 2nd, 2013

Tiff Macklem gave a speech to the Economic Club of Canada titled Global Growth and the Prospects for Canada’s Exports – I found Chart 12 to be of great interest:

A second factor influencing our exports is competitiveness. Between 2000 and 2012, the labour cost of producing a unit of output in Canada compared with the United States, adjusted for the exchange rate, increased by 75 per cent (Chart 12). The majority of this loss of competitiveness reflects the appreciation of the Canadian dollar (shown in blue), but weak productivity growth in Canada relative to the United States also played a significant role (shown in green).


Click for Big

From the bureaucrats at the UBC Staff Pension Plan comes an excellent lesson in bafflement via bullshit:

“We have what is called a target benefit plan,” says Mr. Parker, who is executive director of the University of British Columbia’s staff pension plan.

In a target plan, the employer and its employees make fixed contributions, similar to a defined contribution plan. The payouts that can be expected are set as a target, which depends on projections, made by actuarial experts, of what the plan will be able to afford.

So in other words, it’s a Defined Contribution plan but they don’t want to say the words, so instead of handing over the dollar value of the account on retirement, they hand over a package of benefits, that may or may not increase or decrease and which will disappear when the beneficiary dies. Well done!

Fitch is unimpressed with the games in Washington:

The US government shutdown is not in itself a downgrade trigger for the sovereign’s ‘AAA’/Negative rating. However, it undermines confidence in both the budgetary process and critically in the prospect of the debt ceiling being raised in a timely manner to avert the risk of default on US sovereign debt obligations, says Fitch Ratings in a reiteration of its June 28 rating commentary.

A formal review of the rating with potentially negative implications would be triggered if the US government has not raised the federal debt ceiling in a timely manner prior to when the Treasury will have exhausted extraordinary measures and cash reserves. According to official comments by the US Treasury secretary, extraordinary measures could be exhausted by 17 October.

In such a scenario, the Treasury would be forced to dramatically cut back on current spending with adverse implications for the economic recovery. Even if it were to prioritise debt service – something the Treasury has repeatedly stated it has neither the legal authority nor logistical capability to do – it would likely incur arrears on a range of payment obligations and thus continue to incur debt, but in a disorderly and disruptive manner.

Even if the debt limit is not raised in a timely manner we believe there is sufficient political will and capacity to ensure that Treasury securities will continue to be honoured in full and on time. Nevertheless, investor confidence in the full faith and credit of the US would be undermined in such a scenario. This “faith” is a key underpinning of the US dollar’s global reserve currency status and reason why the US ‘AAA’ rating can tolerate a substantially higher level of public debt than other ‘AAA’ sovereigns.

Non-essential operations of the federal government will cease from today – the government shutdown – after the US House of Representatives and Senate failed to agree a continuing resolution to grant it the necessary spending authority.

Further to my rant of September 25, I was infuriated by the “Moment in Time” feature in today’s Globe (not available on-line), which claimed that “[Henry Ford] raised wages so his workers could become customers”, I looked around more carefully and found this:

It should be obvious that this story doesn’t work: Boeing would most certainly be in trouble if they had to pay their workers sufficient to afford a new jetliner. It’s also obviously true that you want every other employer to be paying their workers sufficient that they can afford your products: but that’s very much not the same as claiming that Ford should pay his workers so that they can afford Fords.

Ford’s turnover rate was very high. In 1913, Ford hired more than 52,000 men to keep a workforce of only 14,000.

Car production in the year before the pay rise was 170,000, in the year of it 202,000. As we can see above the total labour establishment was only 14,000 anyway. Even if all of his workers bought a car every year it wasn’t going to make any but a marginal difference to the sales of the firm.

We can go further too. As we’ve seen the rise in the daily wage was from $2.25 to $5 (including the bonuses etc). Say 240 working days in the year and 14,000 workers and we get a rise in the pay bill of $9 1/4 million over the year. A Model T cost between $550 and $450 (depends on which year we’re talking about). 14,000 cars sold at that price gives us $7 3/4 million to $6 1/4 million in income to the company.

It should be obvious that paying the workforce an extra $9 million so that they can then buy $7 million’s worth of company production just isn’t a way to increase your profits. It’s a great way to increase your losses though.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts up 30bp, FixedResets off 3bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 3bp. Not surprisingly, there’s a bit of a skew in the Performance Highlights table towards winning PerpetualDiscounts. Volume was average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2853 % 2,534.8
FixedFloater 4.29 % 3.61 % 31,089 18.08 1 0.7734 % 3,871.7
Floater 2.67 % 2.86 % 66,116 20.11 5 0.2853 % 2,736.9
OpRet 4.63 % 2.61 % 63,724 0.49 3 0.1674 % 2,637.8
SplitShare 4.76 % 5.03 % 60,188 4.03 6 0.1285 % 2,945.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1674 % 2,412.0
Perpetual-Premium 5.75 % 0.37 % 111,952 0.12 8 0.2829 % 2,279.5
Perpetual-Discount 5.50 % 5.55 % 148,220 14.46 30 0.3039 % 2,360.0
FixedReset 4.94 % 3.69 % 237,575 3.65 85 -0.0280 % 2,456.6
Deemed-Retractible 5.12 % 4.44 % 201,038 6.89 43 0.0333 % 2,381.2
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
MFC.PR.F FixedReset -1.80 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.35
Bid-YTW : 4.79 %
HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible -1.40 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.65
Bid-YTW : 5.24 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset -1.38 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 23.76
Evaluated at bid price : 24.21
Bid-YTW : 3.96 %
BAM.PF.C Perpetual-Discount -1.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 20.14
Evaluated at bid price : 20.14
Bid-YTW : 6.07 %
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 23.56
Evaluated at bid price : 23.90
Bid-YTW : 5.17 %
PWF.PR.R Perpetual-Discount 1.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 24.73
Evaluated at bid price : 25.15
Bid-YTW : 5.55 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset 1.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 23.19
Evaluated at bid price : 24.21
Bid-YTW : 3.67 %
W.PR.H Perpetual-Discount 1.26 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 23.91
Evaluated at bid price : 24.15
Bid-YTW : 5.71 %
CGI.PR.D SplitShare 1.31 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2023-06-14
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.91
Bid-YTW : 4.35 %
TRI.PR.B Floater 1.39 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 21.10
Evaluated at bid price : 21.10
Bid-YTW : 2.50 %
FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount 1.90 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 23.33
Evaluated at bid price : 23.65
Bid-YTW : 5.06 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
CU.PR.C FixedReset 104,121 Desjardins crossed 100,000 at 25.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 4.12 %
SLF.PR.H FixedReset 59,870 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 24.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.57
Bid-YTW : 4.21 %
BNS.PR.Q FixedReset 52,414 RBC bought 11,800 from National at 24.80.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.80
Bid-YTW : 3.69 %
MFC.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 39,809 Desjardins crossed 15,600 at 21.77, then bought 17,200 from Anonymous at 21.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.75
Bid-YTW : 6.33 %
BAM.PF.D Perpetual-Discount 31,981 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 21.26
Evaluated at bid price : 21.26
Bid-YTW : 5.80 %
BMO.PR.L Deemed-Retractible 31,541 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-25
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 26.12
Bid-YTW : 4.25 %
There were 33 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
RY.PR.B Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.49 – 25.82
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.2109

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-08-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.49
Bid-YTW : 3.92 %

BMO.PR.L Deemed-Retractible Quote: 26.12 – 26.42
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.1916

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-25
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 26.12
Bid-YTW : 4.25 %

CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Quote: 20.68 – 21.42
Spot Rate : 0.7400
Average : 0.6337

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 20.68
Evaluated at bid price : 20.68
Bid-YTW : 5.63 %

BAM.PR.X FixedReset Quote: 22.44 – 22.88
Spot Rate : 0.4400
Average : 0.3380

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 22.01
Evaluated at bid price : 22.44
Bid-YTW : 4.28 %

HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible Quote: 24.65 – 24.99
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2458

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.65
Bid-YTW : 5.24 %

CIU.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 21.82 – 22.39
Spot Rate : 0.5700
Average : 0.4804

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-10-01
Maturity Price : 21.46
Evaluated at bid price : 21.82
Bid-YTW : 3.79 %

TD.PR.Y To Reset At 3.5595%

October 1st, 2013

The Toronto-Dominion Bank has announced:

the applicable dividend rates for its Non-Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series Y (the “Series Y Shares”) and Non-Cumulative Floating Rate Preferred Shares, Series Z (the “Series Z Shares”).

With respect to any Series Y Shares that remain outstanding after October 31, 2013, holders of the Series Y Shares will be entitled to receive quarterly fixed non-cumulative preferential cash dividends, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of TD, subject to the provisions of the Bank Act (Canada). The dividend rate for the 5-year period from and including October 31, 2013 to but excluding October 31, 2018 will be 3.5595%, being equal to the 5-Year Government of Canada bond yield determined as at October 1, 2013 plus 1.68%, as determined in accordance with the terms of the Series Y Shares.

With respect to any Series Z Shares that may be issued on October 31, 2013, holders of the Series Z Shares will be entitled to receive quarterly floating rate non-cumulative preferential cash dividends, calculated on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed in such quarterly period divided by 365, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of TD, subject to the provisions of the Bank Act (Canada). The dividend rate for the floating rate period from and including October 31, 2013 to but excluding January 31, 2014 will be 2.666%, being equal to the 90-day Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield determined as of October 1, 2013 plus 1.68%, as determined in accordance with the terms of the Series Z Shares.

Beneficial owners of Series Y Shares who wish to exercise their conversion right should communicate as soon as possible with their broker or other nominee to obtain instructions for exercising such right on or prior to the deadline for exercise, which is 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on October 16, 2013.

The new rate of 3.5595%, is $0.889875 p.a. This represents a steep decline from the original rate of 5.10% (or $1.275 p.a.), so my mailbox will be filling up shortly with outraged queries from casual investors.

We can examine the comparables with the help of the Pairs Equivalency Calculator:

FixedReset / FloatingReset Strong Pairs
FixedReset FloatingReset Next
Exchange
Date
Implied
3-Month
Bill Rate
BNS.PR.P BNS.PR.A 2018-4-26 2.61%
TD.PR.S TD.PR.T 2018-7-31 2.32%
BMO.PR.M BMO.PR.R 2018-8-25 2.14%

The closing bid for TD.PR.Y yesterday was 25.06; assuming this holds after the conversion privilege is no longer available then the average implied three-month bill rate of 2.36% calculated above in turn implies a bid on the new issue of 25.58.

So, as of right now, it looks like conversion is recommended. Naturally, investors will want to wait until the last moment before making a decision.

Additionally, it will be noted that although the deadline for notifying the company is October 16, intermediary brokers will almost always have earlier internal deadlines. Also, it is normal that trades must be settled before notice can be given … so for most brokers, I suggest that the last day for trading the issue in the hopes of reaping enormous profits on conversion will be Wednesday October 9 (remember there is a skip-day for Thanksgiving). This strategy didn’t work very well for the BMO.PR.M / BMO.PR.R conversion, when the price of BMO.PR.M was supported by the conversion privilege and promptly sank after the last trading day to settle prior to the notification date.

On the other hand, the current bid of 25.06 for TD.PR.Y gives a current yield of 3.55% (calculated from the new 3.5595% coupon rate), compared to an average Current Yield of 3.42% for the FixedResets noted above. On that basis – without looking at anything else – TD.PR.Y looks cheap.

On the other hand, the FloatingReset resulting from TD.PR.Y conversion will pay three-month bills +168. BMO.PR.R pays +165 and is bid at 25.11; TD.PR.S pays +160 and is bid at 25.38; both are above today’s bid on TD.PR.Y, but certainly nothing to run around mortgaging the farm for.

So … some might wish to speculate, on the basis that TD.PR.Y should be priced higher than it is and the FloatingReset issue that results from conversion should be higher still. Just remember it’s a speculation!

DGS.PR.A Extends Term, Proposes Treasury Offering

October 1st, 2013

Brompton Group has announced:

Dividend Growth Split Corp. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce it has filed a preliminary short form prospectus with respect to a treasury offering of class A and preferred shares. The class A and preferred share offering prices will be set at levels that ensure that existing unitholders are not diluted.

Dividend Growth Split Corp. invests in a portfolio of common shares of high quality, large capitalization companies, which have among the highest dividend growth rates of those companies included in the S&P/TSX Composite Index. Currently, the portfolio consists of common shares of the following 20 companies:

Great-West Lifeco Inc. The Bank of Nova Scotia AGF Management Limited Shaw Communications Inc.
Industrial Alliance Insurance
and Financial Services Inc.
Canadian Imperial Bank
of Commerce
IGM Financial Inc. TELUS Corporation
Manulife Financial Corporation National Bank of Canada Power Corporation of Canada Canadian Utilities Limited
Sun Life Financial Inc. Royal Bank of Canada Manitoba Telecom Services Enbridge Inc.
Bank of Montreal The Toronto-Dominion Bank Rogers Communications Inc. TransCanada Corporation

The investment objectives for the class A shares are to provide holders with regular monthly cash distributions targeted to be $0.10 per class A share, and to provide the opportunity for growth in net asset value per class A share.

The investment objectives for the preferred shares are to provide holders with fixed cumulative preferential quarterly cash distributions currently in the amount of $0.13125 per preferred share, representing a yield on the original issue price of 5.25% per annum, and to return the original issue price to holders of preferred shares on the original November 30, 2014 maturity date.

The Company is also pleased to announce that the board of directors has approved an extension of the maturity date of the class A and preferred shares of the Company for an additional 5 year term to November 28, 2019. The preferred share dividend rate for the extended term will be announced at least 60 days prior to the original November 30, 2014 maturity date. The new dividend rate will be determined based on then-current market yields for preferred shares with similar terms.

The syndicate of agents for the offering is being led by RBC Capital Markets and CIBC and includes Scotiabank, TD Securities Inc., BMO Capital Markets, National Bank Financial Inc., GMP Securities L.P., Raymond James Ltd., Canaccord Genuity Corp., Desjardins Securities Inc., Dundee Securities Ltd., Mackie Research Capital Corporation, and Macquarie Private Wealth Inc.

September 30, 2013

September 30th, 2013

The US government is heading towards shut-down:

The U.S. government stands poised for its first partial shutdown in 17 years at midnight tonight, after a weekend with no signs of negotiations or compromise from the Congress or the White House.

House Republicans, led by Speaker John Boehner, want to delay President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act for a year and make other changes to the law. Democrats, led by Obama, say that won’t happen. Republicans and Democrats say they don’t want to close the government, though neither side is budging from their positions.

A brief government closure won’t lead to any significant change of the Treasury Department’s forecast for when the U.S. will breach the debt limit, a Treasury spokeswoman said yesterday in an e-mail. The Treasury has said measures to avoid breaching the debt ceiling will be exhausted on Oct. 17.

It was a very, very slightly negative day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts and DeemedRetractibles off 1bp and FixedResets off 2bp. Considering the modesty of the overall moves the Performance Highlights table is surprisingly lengthy, with BAM issues notable on the winning side. Volume was above average.

And that’s it for another month!

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1628 % 2,527.6
FixedFloater 4.32 % 3.64 % 30,916 18.02 1 -1.0356 % 3,841.9
Floater 2.67 % 2.84 % 66,159 20.12 5 -0.1628 % 2,729.1
OpRet 4.63 % 3.09 % 64,489 0.49 3 -0.2953 % 2,633.4
SplitShare 4.77 % 4.96 % 60,488 4.04 6 -0.1958 % 2,941.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2953 % 2,408.0
Perpetual-Premium 5.88 % 5.56 % 124,474 4.52 2 0.0989 % 2,273.1
Perpetual-Discount 5.56 % 5.55 % 145,009 14.32 36 -0.0095 % 2,352.9
FixedReset 4.93 % 3.65 % 240,346 3.63 85 -0.0190 % 2,457.3
Deemed-Retractible 5.12 % 4.47 % 199,971 6.78 43 -0.0124 % 2,380.4
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater -2.39 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 22.22
Evaluated at bid price : 22.50
Bid-YTW : 2.32 %
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount -1.89 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 20.80
Evaluated at bid price : 20.80
Bid-YTW : 5.60 %
BNS.PR.Y FixedReset -1.26 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.45
Bid-YTW : 3.92 %
FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount -1.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 22.80
Evaluated at bid price : 23.21
Bid-YTW : 5.15 %
SLF.PR.E Deemed-Retractible -1.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.62
Bid-YTW : 6.21 %
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater -1.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 22.41
Evaluated at bid price : 21.98
Bid-YTW : 3.64 %
BAM.PR.J OpRet -1.02 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-31
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.26
Bid-YTW : 3.22 %
BAM.PF.C Perpetual-Discount 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 20.36
Evaluated at bid price : 20.36
Bid-YTW : 6.00 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 18.46
Evaluated at bid price : 18.46
Bid-YTW : 2.84 %
IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 1.78 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.81
Bid-YTW : 5.69 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 2.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 21.50
Evaluated at bid price : 21.50
Bid-YTW : 3.99 %
BAM.PF.D Perpetual-Discount 2.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 21.31
Evaluated at bid price : 21.31
Bid-YTW : 5.79 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible 72,005 RBC crossed 57,100 at 21.35.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.26
Bid-YTW : 6.43 %
BNS.PR.Q FixedReset 63,445 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.79
Bid-YTW : 3.70 %
GWO.PR.R Deemed-Retractible 51,938 Desjardins crossed 30,000 at 22.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.50
Bid-YTW : 6.07 %
BAM.PF.D Perpetual-Discount 37,430 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 21.31
Evaluated at bid price : 21.31
Bid-YTW : 5.79 %
ENB.PR.Y FixedReset 35,105 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 22.71
Evaluated at bid price : 23.95
Bid-YTW : 4.32 %
TD.PR.A FixedReset 31,190 Nesbitt crossed 15,000 at 25.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.35
Bid-YTW : 3.29 %
There were 43 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
MFC.PR.F FixedReset Quote: 22.76 – 23.90
Spot Rate : 1.1400
Average : 0.7851

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.76
Bid-YTW : 4.59 %

CGI.PR.D SplitShare Quote: 23.60 – 24.23
Spot Rate : 0.6300
Average : 0.4009

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2023-06-14
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.60
Bid-YTW : 4.51 %

CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Quote: 20.80 – 21.50
Spot Rate : 0.7000
Average : 0.5171

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 20.80
Evaluated at bid price : 20.80
Bid-YTW : 5.60 %

FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount Quote: 23.21 – 23.74
Spot Rate : 0.5300
Average : 0.3879

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-09-30
Maturity Price : 22.80
Evaluated at bid price : 23.21
Bid-YTW : 5.15 %

BNS.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 23.58 – 23.91
Spot Rate : 0.3300
Average : 0.1981

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.58
Bid-YTW : 4.15 %

BNS.PR.O Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.70 – 25.99
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1758

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-04-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.70
Bid-YTW : 4.62 %