Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund’s Net Asset Value per Unit as of the close August 30, 2024, was $10.4589.
Performance was affected by CM.PR.S underperforming (+0.81%, following two months of outperformance); FFH.PR.I (+1.06%); and BN.PR.R (+2.43%). These were outweighed by GWO.PR.G (+7.45%), CU.PR.C (+5.64%, following outperformance in May and underperformance in June and July) and MFC.PR.B (+5.62%) [small holdings are not considered for individual mention here].
FixedResets continue to yield more, in general, than PerpetualDiscounts although the spread has narrowed considerably despite a bounce upwards in May; on August 30, I reported median YTWs of 6.76% and 6.08%, respectively, for these two indices; compare with mean Current Yields of 5.43% and 5.95%, respectively.
| Returns to August 30, 2024 | ||||
| Period | MAPF | TXPR* Total Return |
CPD – according to Blackrock | |
| One Month | +3.38% | +2.71% | N/A | |
| Three Months | +4.50% | +4.99% | N/A | |
| One Year | +41.58% | +30.50% | +29.57% | |
| Two Years (annualized) | +12.26% | +6.98% | N/A | |
| Three Years (annualized) | +4.32% | +2.17% | +1.61% | |
| Four Years (annualized) | +14.11% | +7.48% | N/A | |
| Five Years (annualized) | +12.27% | +7.19% | +6.59% | |
| Six Years (annualized) | +5.39% | +3.42% | N/A | |
| Seven Years (annualized) | +6.25% | +3.91% | N/A | |
| Eight Years (annualized) | +8.40% | +5.21% | N/A | |
| Nine Years (annualized) | +7.59% | +4.92% | N/A | |
| Ten Years (annualized) | +4.93% | +2.68% | +2.16% | |
| Eleven Years (annualized) | +5.49% | +3.03% | ||
| Twelve Years (annualized) | +4.94% | +2.69% | ||
| Thirteen Years (annualized) | +4.88% | +2.88% | ||
| Fourteen Years (annualized) | +5.56% | +3.27% | ||
| Fifteen Years (annualized) | +5.81% | +3.45% | ||
| Sixteen Years (annualized) | +8.52% | +3.64% | ||
| Seventeen Years (annualized) | +7.92% | +3.02% | ||
| Eighteen Years (annualized) | +7.66% | |||
| Nineteen Years (annualized) | +7.57% | |||
| Twenty Years (annualized) | +7.52% | |||
| Twenty-One Years (annualized) | +8.00% | |||
| Twenty-Two Years (annualized) | +8.45% | |||
| Twenty-Three Years (annualized) | +8.39% | |||
| MAPF returns assume reinvestment of distributions, and are shown after expenses but before fees. | ||||
| The BMO Capital Markets “50” Preferred Share Index is no longer being calculated. The final performance report incorporating this venerable index was published as of December, 2020. | ||||
| “TXPR” is the S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index. It is calculated without accounting for fees, but does assume reinvestment of dividends. | ||||
| CPD Returns are for the NAV and are after all fees and expenses. Reinvestment of dividends is assumed. | ||||
| All fund and ETF returns shown below are after all fees and expenses | ||||
| Figures for NBI Preferred Equity Income Fund, Series F [NBC780] (formerly Omega Preferred Equity) (which are after all fees and expenses) for 1-, 3- and 12-months are +2.15%, +4.35% and +31.87%, respectively, according to National Bank Investments after all fees & expenses. Three year performance is +2.86%; five year is +9.01%; ten year is +4.47%.
Figures from Morningstar are no longer conveniently available. |
||||
| Manulife Preferred Income Class Adv has been terminated by Manulife. The performance of this fund was last reported here in March, 2018. | ||||
| Figures for Horizons Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR) (which are after all fees and expenses) for 1-, 3- and 12-months are +1.95%, +4.23% & +33.05%, respectively. Three year performance is +3.09%, five-year is +8.92%, ten year is +3.65% | ||||
| Figures for NBI Preferred Equity Fund Series F [NBC710] (formerly Altamira Preferred Equity Fund) are +1.98%, +4.22% and +34.86% for one-, three- and twelve months, respectively. Three year performance is +3.55%; five-year is +9.35%; ten-year is +3.82%
Acccording to the fund’s fact sheet as of June 30, 2016, the fund’s inception date was October 30, 2015. I do not know how they justify this nonsensical statement, but will assume that prior performance is being suppressed in some perfectly legal manner that somebody at National considers ethical. The last time Altamira Preferred Equity Fund’s performance was reported here was April, 2014; performance under the National Bank banner was first reported here May, 2014. |
||||
| The figures for the NAV of BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR) is +31.97% for the past twelve months. Two year performance is +7.29%, three year is +2.92%, five year is +8.46%, ten year is +2.14%
Note that analysis of ZPR shows some doubt as to whether this fund is either "laddered" or an "index fund". However, there was a remarkable improvement in the laddering in the six months following the publication of my analysis. |
||||
| Figures for Fiera Canadian Preferred Share Class Cg Series F, (formerly Natixis Canadian Preferred Share Class Series F) (formerly NexGen Canadian Preferred Share Tax Managed Fund) are no longer available as the Fund is now the property of Canoe Financial. The last reported performance for the merged fund was May 2020. | ||||
| Figures for BMO Preferred Share Fund (advisor series) are not available as the fund has been terminated. This is as per an announcement by the bank on 2024-5-28. The last performance report for this awful fund was as of July 31, 2024. | ||||
| Figures for PowerShares Canadian Preferred Share Index Class, Series F (PPS) are no longer available since the fund has been terminated. Performance was last reported for the fund to month-end, March 2023 | ||||
| Figures for the First Asset Preferred Share Investment Trust (PSF.UN) are no longer available since the fund has merged with First Asset Preferred Share ETF (FPR).
Performance for the fund was last reported here in September, 2016; the first report of unavailability was in October, 2016. |
||||
| Figures for Lysander-Slater Preferred Share Dividend Fund (Class F) according to the company are +1.7%, +3.8% and +29.9% for the past one, three and twelve months, respectively. Three year performance is +2.7%, five-year is +8.1%. | ||||
| Figures for the Desjardins Canadian Preferred Share Fund F Class (F Class), as reported by the company are +2.74%, +5.10% and +29.40% for the past one, three and twelve months, respectively. Two year performance is +6.71%, three-year is +1.42%, five-year is +6.44% | ||||
| Figures for the RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF (RPF) are reported as +2.2%, +3.8% and +32.0% for the past one, three and twelve months, respectively. Three-year performance is +1.8%, five-year is +7.9% | ||||
| Figures for the Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF (DXP) are +2.5%, +5.2% and +31.7% for the past one, three and twelve months, respectively. Three-year performance is +4.2%; five-year is +10.1% | ||||
| Figures for the Purpose Canadian Preferred Share Fund (Class F) are +1.83%, +3.41% and +31.26% for the past one, three and twelve months, respectively. Three-year performance is +2.18%; four-year is +10.94%; five-year is +9.94%; seven-year is +3.92%; ten-year is +5.02%. | ||||
| Figures for the TD Active Preferred Share ETF (TPRF) are +2.32%, +4.80% and +32.98% for the past one, three and twelve months, respectively. Two-year performance is 8.45%, three-year is +4.52%; five-year is +10.95%.
Note that “The TD ETF may also hold common shares, government and corporate bonds, and other income-producing securities. … The TD ETF may invest in foreign securities to an extent that will vary from time to time but is not typically expected to exceed 5% of its assets at the time that foreign securities are purchased. The non-preferred share components of the portfolio are relatively minor – as of their year-end 2023 report, they had $1.6-million in Canadian Natural Resources Limited common, $1.8-million in RBC common, $1.6-million in SLF common, and $1.75-million in Fortis common, totalling $6.75-million in a $220-million portfolio. I take the view that the purpose of this mandate is to destroy, or at least deprecate, comparability. Banks hate comparability. |
||||
The five-year Canada yield decreased, with the five-year Canada yield (“GOC-5”) moving from 3.24% at July month-end to 2.97% at August month-end.
The Seniority Spread (between long-term corporate bonds and interest-equivalent PerpetualDiscounts) was 305bp on 2024-08-28, a significant narrowing from the 325bp on 2024-7-31 (chart end-date 2024-8-9). This was, presumably, due to widespread reporting that inflation has been conquered:
The situation with FixedResets is interesting, with the spread between GOC-5 and the interest-adjusted FixedReset (Discount) rate widening significantly (despite recent narrowing) from its 2021-11-10 low of 344bp to a level of 589bp (as of 2024-8-28) … (chart end-date 2024-08-9):
…while at the same time the interest-equivalent spread between FixedReset (Discounts) and PerpetualDiscounts has narrowed to -94bp (as of 2024-8-28) from its 2021-7-28 level of +170bp (chart end-date 2024-07-31):
There is no significant correlation between the Issue Reset Spread and 1-month performance for discounted FixedResets for either the Pfd-2 or Pfd-3 Group issues.
There is no significant correlation between the Issue Reset Spread and 3-month performance for discounted FixedResets for either the Pfd-2 or Pfd-3 Group issues.
There is significant correlation for the Pfd-2 Group (26%) and for the Pfd-3 Group (24%) for 1-Month performance against term-to-reset:
… while the three-month returns vs. Term to Reset, show correlations for both the Pfd-2 Group (22%) and the Pfd-3 Group (55%):
It should be noted that to some extent a dependence (of performance on term-to-reset) can be justified as the nearer-term issues will receive the benefit (adverse effects) of higher (lower) projected dividend rates sooner as a result of higher GOC-5 yields and therefore, perhaps, for longer. Equations for the relationship between correlation slope and change in GOC-5 were derived in the August 2022 PrefLetter.
Upward-sloping correlations of Performance vs. Term are to be expected when GOC-5 declines.
I keep talking about ‘Sustainable Income’ and nowadays it’s far higher than the dividends that are currently being distributed. This is because Sustainable Income is the average yield-to-worst (YTW) of the portfolio when the YTW is calculated to perpetuity (or to redemption, of course, if the yield to redemption is lower), including resets at the current GOC-5 rate. The sharp increase in GOC-5 in the past few years has caused the difference between YTW and Current Yield to skyrocket, but one way or another I expect that these two values will become much closer – slowly at first, but quickening in the fairly near future. We have to wait for the reset date of the MAPF portfolio securities before we see a change in actual cash receipts – and, of course, there is no guarantee whatsoever that the rate used for estimation purposes now will be used for the actual calculation in the future (chart prepared as of 2024-8-9).
I will note that the fund’s current holdings of FixedResets are now paying dividends based on their previous reset at an average GOC-5 rate of 1.62% (weighted by shares held).
| Calculation of MAPF Sustainable Income Per Unit | ||||||
| Month | NAVPU | Portfolio Average YTW |
Leverage Divisor |
Securities Average YTW |
Capital Gains Multiplier |
Sustainable Income per current Unit |
| June, 2007 | 9.3114 | 5.16% | 1.03 | 5.01% | 1.3240 | 0.3524 |
| September | 9.1489 | 5.35% | 0.98 | 5.46% | 1.3240 | 0.3773 |
| December, 2007 | 9.0070 | 5.53% | 0.942 | 5.87% | 1.3240 | 0.3993 |
| March, 2008 | 8.8512 | 6.17% | 1.047 | 5.89% | 1.3240 | 0.3938 |
| June | 8.3419 | 6.034% | 0.952 | 6.338% | 1.3240 | $0.3993 |
| September | 8.1886 | 7.108% | 0.969 | 7.335% | 1.3240 | $0.4537 |
| December, 2008 | 8.0464 | 9.24% | 1.008 | 9.166% | 1.3240 | $0.5571 |
| March 2009 | $8.8317 | 8.60% | 0.995 | 8.802% | 1.3240 | $0.5872 |
| June | 10.9846 | 7.05% | 0.999 | 7.057% | 1.3240 | $0.5855 |
| September | 12.3462 | 6.03% | 0.998 | 6.042% | 1.3240 | $0.5634 |
| December 2009 | 10.5662 | 5.74% | 0.981 | 5.851% | 1.1141 | $0.5549 |
| March 2010 | 10.2497 | 6.03% | 0.992 | 6.079% | 1.1141 | $0.5593 |
| June | 10.5770 | 5.96% | 0.996 | 5.984% | 1.1141 | $0.5681 |
| September | 11.3901 | 5.43% | 0.980 | 5.540% | 1.1141 | $0.5664 |
| December 2010 | 10.7659 | 5.37% | 0.993 | 5.408% | 1.0298 | $0.5654 |
| March, 2011 | 11.0560 | 6.00% | 0.994 | 5.964% | 1.0298 | $0.6403 |
| June | 11.1194 | 5.87% | 1.018 | 5.976% | 1.0298 | $0.6453 |
| September | 10.2709 | 6.10% Note |
1.001 | 6.106% | 1.0298 | $0.6090 |
| December, 2011 | 10.0793 | 5.63% Note |
1.031 | 5.805% | 1.0000 | $0.5851 |
| March, 2012 | 10.3944 | 5.13% Note |
0.996 | 5.109% | 1.0000 | $0.5310 |
| June | 10.2151 | 5.32% Note |
1.012 | 5.384% | 1.0000 | $0.5500 |
| September | 10.6703 | 4.61% Note |
0.997 | 4.624% | 1.0000 | $0.4934 |
| December, 2012 | 10.8307 | 4.24% | 0.989 | 4.287% | 1.0000 | $0.4643 |
| March, 2013 | 10.9033 | 3.87% | 0.996 | 3.886% | 1.0000 | $0.4237 |
| June | 10.3261 | 4.81% | 0.998 | 4.80% | 1.0000 | $0.4957 |
| September | 10.0296 | 5.62% | 0.996 | 5.643% | 1.0000 | $0.5660 |
| December, 2013 | 9.8717 | 6.02% | 1.008 | 5.972% | 1.0000 | $0.5895 |
| March, 2014 | 10.2233 | 5.55% | 0.998 | 5.561% | 1.0000 | $0.5685 |
| June | 10.5877 | 5.09% | 0.998 | 5.100% | 1.0000 | $0.5395 |
| September | 10.4601 | 5.28% | 0.997 | 5.296% | 1.0000 | $0.5540 |
| December, 2014 | 10.5701 | 4.83% | 1.009 | 4.787% | 1.0000 | $0.5060 |
| March, 2015 | 9.9573 | 4.99% | 1.001 | 4.985% | 1.0000 | $0.4964 |
| June, 2015 | 9.4181 | 5.55% | 1.002 | 5.539% | 1.0000 | $0.5217 |
| September | 7.8140 | 6.98% | 0.999 | 6.987% | 1.0000 | $0.5460 |
| December, 2015 | 8.1379 | 6.85% | 0.997 | 6.871% | 1.0000 | $0.5592 |
| March, 2016 | 7.4416 | 7.79% | 0.998 | 7.805% | 1.0000 | $0.5808 |
| June | 7.6704 | 7.67% | 1.011 | 7.587% | 1.0000 | $0.5819 |
| September | 8.0590 | 7.35% | 0.993 | 7.402% | 1.0000 | $0.5965 |
| December, 2016 | 8.5844 | 7.24% | 0.990 | 7.313% | 1.0000 | $0.6278 |
| March, 2017 | 9.3984 | 6.26% | 0.994 | 6.298% | 1.0000 | $0.5919 |
| June | 9.5313 | 6.41% | 0.998 | 6.423% | 1.0000 | $0.6122 |
| September | 9.7129 | 6.56% | 0.998 | 6.573% | 1.0000 | $0.6384 |
| December, 2017 | 10.0566 | 6.06% | 1.004 | 6.036% | 1.0000 | $0.6070 |
| March, 2018 | 10.2701 | 6.22% | 1.007 | 6.177% | 1.0000 | $0.6344 |
| June | 10.2518 | 6.22% | 0.995 | 6.251% | 1.0000 | $0.6408 |
| September | 10.2965 | 6.62% | 1.018 | 6.503% | 1.0000 | $0.6696 |
| December, 2018 | 8.6875 | 7.16% | 0.997 | 7.182% | 1.0000 | $0.6240 |
| March, 2019 | 8.4778 | 7.09% | 1.007 | 7.041% | 1.0000 | $0.5969 |
| June | 8.0896 | 7.33% | 0.996 | 7.359% | 1.0000 | $0.5953 |
| September | 7.7948 | 7.96% | 0.998 | 7.976% | 1.0000 | $0.6217 |
| December, 2019 | 8.0900 | 6.03% | 0.995 | 6.060% | 1.0000 | $0.4903 |
| March | 5.5596 | 7.04% | 1.006 | 6.998% | 1.0000 | $0.3891 |
| June | 6.3568 | 6.10% | 0.9900 | 6.162% | 1.0000 | $0.3917 |
| September | 7.2852 | 5.32% | 1.00 | 5.320% | 1.0000 | $0.3876 |
| December, 2020 | 8.3947 | 4.46% | 0.999 | 4.464% | 1.0000 | $0.3747 |
| March, 2021 | 9.6473 | 4.48% | 0.996 | 4.498% | 1.0000 | $0.4339 |
| June | 10.3712 | 3.92% | 0.985 | 3.980% | 1.0000 | $0.4127 |
| September | 10.7572 | 4.08% | 1.017 | 4.012% | 1.0000 | $0.4316 |
| December, 2021 | 10.7432 | 4.31% | 0.999 | 4.314% | 1.0000 | $0.4635 |
| March, 2022 | 10.5040 | 5.53% | 1.004 | 5.508% | 1.0000 | $0.5786 |
| June | 9.3115 | 7.04% | 0.993 | 7.090% | 1.0000 | $0.6672 |
| September | 8.4093 | 8.10% | 0.997 | 8.124% | 1.0000 | $0.6916 |
| December, 2022 | 7.9921 | 8.47% | 0.996 | 8.504% | 1.0000 | $0.6796 |
| March, 2023 | 8.0788 | 7.90% | 0.997 | 7.924% | 1.0000 | $0.6401 |
| June 30 | 8.0197 | 9.19% | 1.003 | 9.163% | 1.0000 | $0.7348 |
| September 29 | 7.9922 | 9.86% | 0.997 | 9.890% | 1.0000 | $0.7904 |
| Decenber 29, 2023 | 8.4715 | 8.14% | 1.002 | 8.124% | 1.0000 | $0.6882 |
| March 28,2024 | 9.5892 | 7.60% | 1.006 | 7.555% | 1.0000 | $0.7244 |
| June 28, 2024 | 9.8516 | 7.32% | 0.999 | 7.327% | 1.0000 | $0.7219 |
| August 30,2024 | 10.4589 | 6.77% | 0.998 | 6.784% | 1.0000 | $0.7095 |
| NAVPU is shown after quarterly distributions of dividend income and annual distribution of capital gains. Portfolio YTW includes cash (or margin borrowing), with an assumed interest rate of 0.00% The Leverage Divisor indicates the level of cash in the account: if the portfolio is 1% in cash, the Leverage Divisor will be 0.99 Securities YTW divides “Portfolio YTW” by the “Leverage Divisor” to show the average YTW on the securities held; this assumes that the cash is invested in (or raised from) all securities held, in proportion to their holdings. The Capital Gains Multiplier adjusts for the effects of Capital Gains Dividends. On 2009-12-31, there was a capital gains distribution of $1.989262 which is assumed for this purpose to have been reinvested at the final price of $10.5662. Thus, a holder of one unit pre-distribution would have held 1.1883 units post-distribution; the CG Multiplier reflects this to make the time-series comparable. Note that Dividend Distributions are not assumed to be reinvested. Sustainable Income is the resultant estimate of the fund’s dividend income per current unit, before fees and expenses. Note that a “current unit” includes reinvestment of prior capital gains; a unitholder would have had the calculated sustainable income with only, say, 0.9 units in the past which, with reinvestment of capital gains, would become 1.0 current units. |
||||||
| DeemedRetractibles are comprised of all Straight Perpetuals (both PerpetualDiscount and PerpetualPremium) issued by BMO, BNS, CM, ELF, GWO, HSB, IAG, MFC, NA, RY, SLF and TD, which are not exchangable into common at the option of the company or the regulator (definition refined in May, 2011). These issues are analyzed as if their prospectuses included a requirement to redeem at par on or prior to 2022-1-31 (banks) or the Deemed Maturity date for insurers and insurance holding companies (see below)), in addition to the call schedule explicitly defined. See the Deemed Retractible Review: September 2016 for the rationale behind this analysis.
The same reasoning is also applied to FixedResets from these issuers, other than explicitly defined NVCC from banks. In November, 2019, the assumption of DeemedRetraction for insurance issues was cancelled in the wake of the IAIS decision included in ICS 2.0. This resulted in a large drop in the yield calculated for these issues |
||||||
| The Deemed Maturity date for insurers was set at 2022-1-31 at the commencement of the process in February, 2011. It was extended to 2025-1-31 in April, 2013 and to 2030-1-31 in December, 2018. In November, 2019, the assumption of DeemedRetraction was cancelled in the wake of the IAIS decision included in ICS 2.0. | ||||||
| Yields for September, 2011, to January, 2012, were calculated by imposing a cap of 10% on the yields of YLO issues held, in order to avoid their extremely high calculated yields distorting the calculation and to reflect the uncertainty in the marketplace that these yields will be realized. From February to September 2012, yields on these issues have been set to zero. All YLO issues held were sold in October 2012. | ||||||
These calculations were performed assuming constant contemporary GOC-5 and 3-Month Bill rates, as follows:
| Canada Yields Assumed in Calculations | ||
| Month-end | GOC-5 | 3-Month Bill |
| September, 2015 | 0.78% | 0.40% |
| December, 2015 | 0.71% | 0.46% |
| March, 2016 | 0.70% | 0.44% |
| June | 0.57% | 0.47% |
| September | 0.58% | 0.53% |
| December, 2016 | 1.16% | 0.47% |
| March, 2017 | 1.08% | 0.55% |
| June | 1.35% | 0.69% |
| September | 1.79% | 0.97% |
| December, 2017 | 1.83% | 1.00% |
| March, 2018 | 2.06% | 1.08% |
| June | 1.95% | 1.22% |
| September | 2.33% | 1.55% |
| December, 2018 | 1.88% | 1.65% |
| March, 2019 | 1.46% | 1.66% |
| June | 1.34% | 1.66% |
| September | 1.41% | 1.66% |
| December, 2019 | 1.68% | 1.68% |
| March, 2020 | 0.57% | 0.21% |
| June | 0.37% | 0.21% |
| September | 0.35% | 0.14% |
| December, 2020 | 0.42% | 0.08% |
| March, 2021 | 0.94% | 0.09% |
| June | 0.93% | 0.13% |
| September | 1.07% | 0.13% |
| December, 2021 | 1.31% | 0.16% |
| March, 2022 | 2.44% | 0.53% |
| June | 3.24% | 2.11% |
| September | 3.45% | 3.60% |
| December, 2022 | 3.37% | 4.35% |
| March, 2023 | 2.93% | 4.44% |
| June | 3.74% | 5.00% |
| September | 4.31% | 5.21% |
| December, 2023 | 3.21% | 5.13% |
| March, 2024 | 3.55% | 5.06% |
| June | 3.41% | 4.71% |
| August, 2024 | 2.97% | 4.29% |
“The situation with FixedResets is interesting, with the spread between GOC-5 and the interest-adjusted FixedReset (Discount) rate widening significantly (despite recent narrowing) from its 2021-11-10 low of 344bp to a level of 589bp (as of 2024-8-28)”
The interruption in the decline from the peak in October gives this recovery (to a lower spread) a different shape that the previous two recoveries. I don’t expect that nearly 6% is the new normal spread. A further decline of 2% or more should be in the cards.
I wonder what is the historical spread between GOC-5 and FR rate?
I understand that the historical average spread is dependent of different market condition but still would give some sort of baseline
“I wonder what is the historical spread between GOC-5 and FR rate?”
I think a better question is what is a reasonable spread. Investors are accepting the risk of placing their money between common equity and junior subordinated debt of corporate entities to capture the spread (and for individuals, dividend income vs interest income). How much is enough? I suggest below 4%, which can be seen in James’ chart quite clearly.
Before about 2015 it was below 4%, sometimes below 2%. Since then, we have had three blowouts where the spread has ballooned to irrational levels. Both previous times the spread fell below 4% before the next crises sent it soaring. I’d be very surprised if the curve stalls out near 6% this time.
Does anyone have the details on TA.PR.J?
I understand EQB.PR.C was called.
Been gone until today and looking at nothing on TA site.
Thx.
here is the news release from TRansalta:
https://transalta.com/newsroom/transalta-announces-dividend-rates-on-series-g-preferred-shares-and-series-h-preferred-shares/
No correction from what I have seen from ALtagas.
Brookfield should be announcing the new rate on BN.PF.F as well, though nothing on their website yet.
On a different note, does anyone have any idea why many split share prefs suddenly spike on large volume just before the close? DFN.PR.A, SBC.PR.A, LBS.PR.A….well, just about all of the bigger prefs. Maybe ETF buying?
There were buy orders for the below in the TSX MOC which starts getting disseminated at 3:50. Looks like some of them started moving before that though. No clue who or why.
DFN.PR.A 86034
BK.PR.A 64103
FFN.PR.A 63194
FTN.PR.A 61421
LBS.PR.A 56401
SBC.PR.A 39399
GDV.PR.A 26810
DF.PR.A 24541
ENS.PR.A 20246
LCS.PR.A 19815
RS.PR.A 10601
PWI.PR.A 2470
IS.PR.A 1846
TRP.PR.A 500
Here is the Brookfield announcement on the dividend for BN.PR.F:
https://bn.brookfield.com/press-releases/brookfield-announces-reset-dividend-rate-its-series-40-preference-shares
BN.PF.F 5.833%
https://bn.brookfield.com/press-releases/brookfield-announces-reset-dividend-rate-its-series-40-preference-shares
PIC.PR.A to pay 8.5%
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/premium-income-corporation-preferred-share-200000209.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9jYS5maW5hbmNlLnlhaG9vLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHm9INgS7n0PtLSbbwymUqVyGkU5ezBMrTEYlC0f2Ithuho3H-JKkzgrRCeP5vnduMHi5Ph1Q3pkSfjSb1MywFlnfiA1WLmxT9MDCm5Vv49SdM_zTfS0Jj8_RBTL1n0ZraEXq8sLPXQD6NbniQE9ZKO5SUL7RHdxdd85MMiEoVT-&_guc_consent_skip=1725402976
Re PIC.PR.A
So there is only about 19.3% downside protection (based on Aug 30 NAVs), the capital shares are paid $0.80 in dividends per annum with no NAV trigger to pause dividends on the capital shares (please correct me if I am wrong about this) and now pref divvys of $1.275 per annum, so total div of $2.075 per annum for the fund. Huge grind here I would imagine.
Better hope that the bank shares do damn well and that the fund managers don’t give away all that upside by selling too many calls.
I will pass on this.
[…] & ALA.PR.H To Be Extended. There are numerous other announcements to pass on (as noted in the comments, but I will take care of them in the […]
wow these split preferred today.
Someone brought the price of LBS.PR.A to
$10.79… why?!
Re PIC.pr.a
On current data, I tend to agree with Niagara ´s analysis.
This is a desperate attempt to starve off redemptions at the end of the month. They will want to avoid pref redemptions as much as they can especially given that the capital shares trade above NAV.
That being said, if there is significant redemptions, then there will be consolidation of the capital shares and that should improve the downward protection, and then 8.5% maybe more appropriate given the risk.
The lack of NAV trigger reamaining an issue.
So it is quite a conondrum. For this issue to make sense it requires a lot of redemptions, but if you redeem, you do not hold the issue anymore to benefit from the result of the redemption.
I own a bunch of them that I purchased with the intent of redeeming and I think I will stay the course. Fully expect yield chasers to thank me for this 😄
Altagas update:
https://www.altagas.ca/newsroom/news-releases/altagas-provides-final-pricing-and-dividend-reset-rates-series-g-and-series
victory! successfully lobbied to lower the coupon 7bps
bit odd they used 2.95 and not 2.97 though as others did
[…] Thanks to Assiduous Reader newbiepref for bringing this to my attention. […]
[…] Thanks to Assiduous Reader IrateAR for bringing this to my attention. […]