Market Action

September 21, 2010

Ireland looks like it’s heading for the debt trap:

Ireland will today try to sell as much as 1.5 billion euros ($1.96 billion) in bonds as the government tries to convince investors the country can avoid a European Union bailout.

One day after the premium on Irish 10-year debt over German equivalents rose to a record, the Dublin-based National Treasury Management Agency is offering between 1 billion euros and 1.5 billion euros of four- and eight-year bonds. The auction results will be announced after 10 a.m.

Investors’ concerns about the fiscal health of some euro nations are resurfacing four months after the EU announced an almost $1 trillion rescue package to stamp out contagion from Greece’s fiscal crisis. The spread on Irish debt over bunds yesterday exceeded 400 basis points as the government struggles to cap the cost of bailing out its banking system. In Portugal, the spread climbed as high as 399 basis points.

The Bank Act review cycle has started again:

The Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, today launched the scheduled review of legislation governing federally regulated financial institutions.

“The Government reviews the statutes that govern federally regulated financial institutions every five years to ensure Canada remains a global leader in financial services,” said Minister Flaherty. “This practice sets Canada apart from almost every other country in the world.”

“Some fine-tuning to the system may be required, but wholesale change is not necessary,” he said. “The Government would like to hear the views of all Canadians on how to improve our financial system.”

My wish-list includes greater clarity on the status of Bankers’ Acceptances in bankruptcy (are they covered bonds? Can investors look through the bank guarantee to the actual issuer of the paper?) and a requirement that the seniority of instruments within the “general” bucket be specified … if I own a BDN, is that more or less senior than a BA?

The FOMC Statement was gloomy:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in August indicates that the pace of recovery in output and employment has slowed in recent months. Household spending is increasing gradually, but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software is rising, though less rapidly than earlier in the year, while investment in nonresidential structures continues to be weak. Employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. Housing starts are at a depressed level. Bank lending has continued to contract, but at a reduced rate in recent months. The Committee anticipates a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability, although the pace of economic recovery is likely to be modest in the near term.

and accordingly:

The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period. The Committee also will maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings.

This had an effect:

Gold rose to a record, Treasury two-year yields slid to an all-time low while the dollar weakened as the Federal Reserve said it’s willing to ease monetary policy further if needed to boost the economy. Most U.S. stocks fell.

Gold futures surged as much as 0.9 percent to $1,292.40 an ounce as of 4 p.m. in New York as the dollar depreciated against 15 of 16 major counterparts. The 10-year Treasury yield lost 13 basis points to 2.58 percent and the 2-year yield slid to a record low of 0.4155 percent.

Quadravest, purveyor of SplitShare funds, has announced:

Dividend Select 15 Corp. (“The Company”) is pleased to announce the filing of a preliminary prospectus dated September 17, 2010 for a proposed new offering of equity shares at $10.00 per share.
The Company has been created to provide investors with an opportunity to invest in a portfolio (the “Portfolio”) of 15 high quality Canadian companies (the “Portfolio Companies”) whose shares provide an attractive dividend yield, and which have shown solid earnings growth and have a history of capital appreciation. The Company will employ a covered call writing strategy to generate additional income to the Portfolio. The 15 Portfolio Companies will be selected from among the following 20 companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange: [Usual suspects – JH]

Interestingly, the prospectus makes the flat statement:

The Company will not borrow money or use leverage as part of its investment strategies.

In accordance with the usual state of affairs, the prospectus fully discloses the investment managers’ experience, but is completely silent regarding the investment managers’ performance.

The Canadian preferred share market continued to move from strength to strength on heavy volume today, with PerpetualDiscounts up 27bp and FixedResets gaining 18bp.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.5688 % 2,120.1
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.5688 % 3,211.7
Floater 2.87 % 3.30 % 74,074 18.98 3 0.5688 % 2,289.1
OpRet 4.86 % 0.83 % 82,825 0.19 9 0.2522 % 2,385.4
SplitShare 5.88 % -30.85 % 62,709 0.09 2 -0.1012 % 2,396.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2522 % 2,181.2
Perpetual-Premium 5.67 % 5.23 % 149,005 5.35 14 0.2512 % 1,997.1
Perpetual-Discount 5.50 % 5.60 % 197,520 14.51 63 0.2694 % 1,979.4
FixedReset 5.21 % 2.94 % 292,739 3.30 47 0.1778 % 2,280.4
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.K Floater 1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 15.70
Evaluated at bid price : 15.70
Bid-YTW : 3.34 %
NA.PR.M Perpetual-Premium 1.18 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-14
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.51
Bid-YTW : 5.08 %
MFC.PR.B Perpetual-Discount 1.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 20.25
Evaluated at bid price : 20.25
Bid-YTW : 5.78 %
SLF.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.48 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 21.21
Evaluated at bid price : 21.21
Bid-YTW : 5.63 %
POW.PR.B Perpetual-Discount 1.69 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 23.74
Evaluated at bid price : 24.00
Bid-YTW : 5.67 %
MFC.PR.C Perpetual-Discount 1.70 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 19.74
Evaluated at bid price : 19.74
Bid-YTW : 5.74 %
BAM.PR.I OpRet 1.70 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-10-21
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 26.30
Bid-YTW : -31.13 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
CM.PR.I Perpetual-Discount 208,169 RBC crossed blocks of 55,000 and 40,000, both at 22.35. Nesbitt crossed 23,600 at 22.40. RBC crossed 42,600 at 22.35.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 22.20
Evaluated at bid price : 22.33
Bid-YTW : 5.34 %
CM.PR.L FixedReset 159,704 Desjardins crossed 119,000 at 28.40 and 25,000 at 28.41.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 28.36
Bid-YTW : 2.92 %
TD.PR.P Perpetual-Discount 151,890 TD crossed 100,000 at 24.41; RBC crossed 40,000 at 24.55.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 24.25
Evaluated at bid price : 24.48
Bid-YTW : 5.44 %
TD.PR.O Perpetual-Discount 140,375 RBC crossed blocks of 65,000 and 54,100, both at 23.35.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 23.12
Evaluated at bid price : 23.34
Bid-YTW : 5.26 %
BMO.PR.K Perpetual-Discount 139,631 TD crossed blocks of 100,000 and 25,000, both at 24.60.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-21
Maturity Price : 24.35
Evaluated at bid price : 24.58
Bid-YTW : 5.39 %
BMO.PR.P FixedReset 85,232 Desjardins crossed 50,000 at 27.92.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-03-27
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.96
Bid-YTW : 2.66 %
There were 56 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Miscellaneous News

European FixedReset Bonds

RWE AG, a German utility sold some hybrids:

RWE AG, Germany’s second-biggest utility, sold 1.75 billion euros ($2.3 billion) of hybrid bonds in the biggest offering of the equity-like securities in Europe since 2006.

RWE’s perpetual notes were priced to yield 265 basis points more than the five-year benchmark swap rate, according to a banker involved in the sale. The Essen-based company can redeem the fixed-rate notes in 2015 and 2020. If the notes aren’t called within 10 years, the coupon changes to a floating rate equal to the initial spread plus 100 basis points more than the euro interbank offered rate.

In another Euro deal Scottish and Southern Energy plc issued a big whack of similar instruments:

The Euro Securities will bear interest from (and including) the Issue Date to (but excluding) 1 October 2015 at a rate of 5.025 per cent. per annum, payable annually in arrear on 1 October in each year. The first payment of interest, to be made on 1 October 2011, will be in respect of the period from (and including) the Issue Date to (but excluding) 1 October 2011 and will amount to A51.76 per A1,000 in principal amount of the Euro Securities. Thereafter, unless previously redeemed, the Euro Securities will bear interest from (and including) 1 October 2015 to (but excluding) 1 October 2020 at a rate per annum which shall be 3.150 per cent. above the then prevailing euro 5 year Swap Rate, payable annually in arrear on 1 October in each year. From (and including) 1 October 2020, the Euro Securities will bear interest at a rate reset annually of 4.150 per cent. per annum above the Euro interbank offered rate for 12-month deposits in euro, payable annually in arrear on the Interest Payment Date falling in October in each year, all as more particularly described in ‘‘Terms and Conditions of the Euro Securities — Interest Payments’’.

The Issuer may redeem all, but not some only, of the relevant Securities on the First Call Date, the Second Call Date or any Interest Payment Date thereafter at their principal amount together with any accrued and unpaid interest up to (but excluding) the redemption date and any outstanding Arrears of Interest.

Index Construction / Reporting

FixedReset Index YTW Now Through 3.00%

It seems like only yesterday that I was excited that the FixedReset Index YTW had hit an all-time low of 3.26% … but no, that happened on August 19. It only took another month to hop over the next milestone, as the median weighted average Yield-to-Worst of the FixedReset index is now firmly below 3.00%.


Click for Big

To celebrate, I am publishing the FixedReset index constituent list, sorted three ways:

Short corporates now yield about 2.7%, so one can certainly make a case for the idea that a yield below 3.0% for FixedResets is fair and reasonable – that allows 150bp for extension and credit risk on a pre-tax interest-equivalent basis – but I don’t think the market thinks like that and I think the market will receive a rude shock when the issuers start calling these things.

I was interviewed today by a reporter for a major Canadian newspaper and talked about what I liked for 15 minutes … then told her ‘wait a minute, you have to put something about FixedResets in this article or you’ll get about 100 eMails following publication, because a lot of people love these things.’ Not to worry – apparently the other experts she interviewed for the piece strongly recommended FixedResets. Hopefully, I’ll get a look at the article later this week.

How about that PWF.PR.P, eh? It’s a 4.40%+160 FixedReset issued in June …. now trading at 26.23-34, but given a 5-Year GOC yield of 2.11%, it’s not expected to be called 2016-1-31.

Market Action

September 20, 2010

Stub quotes will be butted out:

NYSE Euronext, Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. and Bats Global Markets sought permission from regulators yesterday to eliminate stub quotes, or bids and offers as low as pennies or as high as thousands of dollars provided by market makers that were blamed for worsening the May 6 crash.

Stub quotes are placeholders provided by market makers at prices as low as 1 cent to satisfy a regulatory obligation to submit both bids and offers. Transactions aren’t meant to occur at those levels.

I don’t understand why stub quotes were ever allowed in the first place. As some HFT firms have pointed out:

In exchange for meeting stricter obligations, market makers are generally given advantages over other market participants, which act like subsidies,” RGM, Hudson River, Allston and Quantlab said in their letter. “These advantages have typically involved preferential access to the markets, lower fees and informational advantages. These advantages come at a substantial cost for all investors as they degrade competition and raise barriers to entry for new participants.”

Why market makers would be permitted to pay for these presumably valuable privileges with stub quotes is quite beyond me.

The pointless nature of financial journalism was well illustrated by two stories published back to back. The first was Fed Will Retain Policy on Assets, Low-Rate Pledge, Survey Shows:

The Federal Reserve next week is likely to affirm its pledge to keep interest rates low for an “extended period” and maintain the floor on its holdings of securities, say economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

The Fed’s Open Market Committee at its Sept. 21 meeting will hold off from expanding the balance sheet by purchasing securities, according to 60 of 64 analysts surveyed Sept. 16-17. Fifty-four of 63 economists said the Fed will leave unchanged a sentence saying high unemployment and low inflation warrant “exceptionally low” rates for an “extended period.”

… and the second was Treasury Notes Gain on Bets Fed’s Statement Will Signal More Accommodation:

Treasury 10-year notes rose for the first time in four weeks as traders speculated the Federal Reserve will be more accommodative in its policy statement next week as the economic recovery showed signs of stalling.

A rally in two-year notes pushed yields down this week the most since May after the central bank bought shorter-maturity government debt and as investors bet that Japan’s purchases of securities will favor the front end of the U.S. yield curve after it sold the yen to weaken its currency. Notes climbed before the Sept. 21 Fed meeting as the annual rate of inflation excluding food and energy stayed at a 44-year low.

There’s a negative CDS basis in bank bonds:

Gaps between credit-default swaps and bonds have widened to 25 basis points from less than 2 basis points about three months ago, according to Citigroup Inc. Pimco, the manager of the world’s largest bond fund is finding as much as 1 percent of extra yield even after paying to insure bank debt, said Mark Kiesel, a managing director at the Newport Beach, California- based firm.

A rally that started in June may gain momentum as the divergence between swaps and yields gives investors extra incentive to own corporate debt. The increase in the so-called negative basis is attracting buyers that seek to profit by buying the debt while also purchasing credit swaps.

The 100-basis-point gaps Pimco is identifying in bank bonds and 25 basis points in the broader market compare with the average difference of more than 250 basis points after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. two years ago, just before bonds posted a record rally. The all-time wide gaps emerged as credit markets seized up, causing bond spreads to soar while demand for swap protection failed to keep up.

“When capital is scarce, the basis becomes more negative,” said Alberto Gallo, a New York-based strategist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. He said the basis should narrow as monetary policy and regulation reduce risk in the financial system and stabilize funding costs.

Negative-basis CDS spreads were discussed in Canadian Bond Liquidity Premia

I have sent the following communication to Canada Post and True North Public Affairs, where James Roche, Chairman of the Canada Post Foundation for Mental Health, has his day-job:

Sirs,

One of your clerks advised me that you were “collecting for mental health” today while I was purchasing stamps and requested a donation.

I strongly object to being importuned by beggars while going about my business and wish to advise you that I will have my first class mail serviced by your competitors in future.

I have often observed that precious little do-gooders tend to behave as thugs and therefore have a question: do you make it clear to your front-line staff that participation in this disgraceful exhibition of poor manners is entirely voluntary and there will be no repercussions on those who do not wish to humiliate themselves by begging? Or are they forced to participate as a condition of employment?

Sincerely,

Beggars! It’s enough to make a strong man go postal!

Hellzapoppin’ on the Canadian preferred share market today, with PerpetualDiscounts up 55bp and FixedResets gaining 12bp on heavy volume.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.6278 % 2,108.1
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.6278 % 3,193.5
Floater 2.89 % 3.33 % 74,914 18.92 3 0.6278 % 2,276.2
OpRet 4.87 % -0.20 % 85,589 0.19 9 -0.4130 % 2,379.4
SplitShare 5.87 % -27.57 % 63,073 0.09 2 -0.0809 % 2,398.6
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.4130 % 2,175.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.68 % 5.29 % 137,820 5.35 14 0.1649 % 1,992.1
Perpetual-Discount 5.51 % 5.60 % 194,338 14.47 63 0.5511 % 1,974.1
FixedReset 5.22 % 2.96 % 294,601 3.30 47 0.1158 % 2,276.4
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.I OpRet -4.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-10-20
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.86
Bid-YTW : -13.04 %
BNS.PR.K Perpetual-Discount 1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 22.86
Evaluated at bid price : 23.08
Bid-YTW : 5.27 %
BAM.PR.K Floater 1.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 15.52
Evaluated at bid price : 15.52
Bid-YTW : 3.38 %
PWF.PR.K Perpetual-Discount 1.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 22.15
Evaluated at bid price : 22.30
Bid-YTW : 5.63 %
RY.PR.D Perpetual-Discount 1.07 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 21.49
Evaluated at bid price : 21.81
Bid-YTW : 5.19 %
CU.PR.B Perpetual-Premium 1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-10-20
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.69
Bid-YTW : 0.53 %
PWF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 23.01
Evaluated at bid price : 23.29
Bid-YTW : 5.71 %
BMO.PR.J Perpetual-Discount 1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 22.17
Evaluated at bid price : 22.30
Bid-YTW : 5.09 %
PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Discount 1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 22.72
Evaluated at bid price : 22.90
Bid-YTW : 5.65 %
POW.PR.C Perpetual-Discount 1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-01-05
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.35
Bid-YTW : 5.56 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 15.73
Evaluated at bid price : 15.73
Bid-YTW : 3.33 %
GWO.PR.H Perpetual-Discount 1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 21.75
Evaluated at bid price : 21.75
Bid-YTW : 5.60 %
BNS.PR.M Perpetual-Discount 1.19 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 21.95
Evaluated at bid price : 22.06
Bid-YTW : 5.17 %
BNS.PR.L Perpetual-Discount 1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 21.95
Evaluated at bid price : 22.06
Bid-YTW : 5.17 %
HSB.PR.D Perpetual-Discount 1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 23.32
Evaluated at bid price : 23.55
Bid-YTW : 5.32 %
MFC.PR.C Perpetual-Discount 1.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 19.41
Evaluated at bid price : 19.41
Bid-YTW : 5.84 %
HSB.PR.C Perpetual-Discount 1.63 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 23.45
Evaluated at bid price : 23.70
Bid-YTW : 5.39 %
RY.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.92 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 22.11
Evaluated at bid price : 22.25
Bid-YTW : 5.05 %
POW.PR.D Perpetual-Discount 2.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 22.66
Evaluated at bid price : 22.85
Bid-YTW : 5.57 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
BNS.PR.Q FixedReset 212,890 TD crossed 65,000 at 26.70; RBC crossed two blocks of 64,800 each, both at 26.65.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-11-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.65
Bid-YTW : 2.98 %
CM.PR.G Perpetual-Discount 78,219 RBC bought 12,600 from Scotia at 24.64; TD crossed 29,200 at 24.61. Desjardins bought 12,000 from Scotia at 24.63.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 24.34
Evaluated at bid price : 24.62
Bid-YTW : 5.56 %
MFC.PR.B Perpetual-Discount 69,698 RBC sold 11,100 to anonymous at 19.98; ITG Canada (who?) crossed 13,500 at 20.08.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 20.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.00
Bid-YTW : 5.86 %
RY.PR.I FixedReset 59,500 TD crossed 50,000 at 26.73.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.70
Bid-YTW : 3.00 %
RY.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 55,145 Scotia crossed 14,000 at 21.81.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-20
Maturity Price : 22.11
Evaluated at bid price : 22.25
Bid-YTW : 5.05 %
SLF.PR.F FixedReset 51,400 Nesbitt crossed 49,900 at 27.65.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.60
Bid-YTW : 3.09 %
There were 68 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Issue Comments

FIG.PR.A Holders Approve Merger; Now up To FIG.UN

Faircourt Asset Management has announced:

The adjourned special meetings of preferred securityholders of Faircourt Income & Growth Split Trust (“FIG”) and Faircourt Split Trust (“FCS”), which were originally held on September 13, 2010 but were adjourned for lack of quorum, were held today at which the preferred securityholders of FIG approved the merger of FIG into FCS (the “Merger”) and the exchange of preferred securities of FIG for a new class of preferred securities of FCS (the “Exchange”), and the preferred securityholders of FCS approved various amendments to the FCS declaration of trust and FCS trust indenture (the “FCS Proposals”), as described in the joint management information circular dated August 13, 2010 (the “Circular”). The Merger Proposal remains subject to approval by the unitholders of FIG.

The Merger and FCS Proposals are a response to expected changes in the taxation of income funds. As a result of these changes, there are now an insufficient number of “income funds” for FIG and FCS to continue to meet its investment restrictions. Consequently, upon implementation of the FCS Proposals, the investment mandate of FCS, as the continuing trust, will be expanded to remedy this situation and FCS will be able to invest in a broader range of securities and adjust its portfolio in the future as and when required to respond to market movements.

The Merger will also be considered by unitholders of FIG the funds at the adjourned special meeting of such unitholders to be held on September 27, 2010, and implementation of the Merger and the FCS Proposals are conditional on the approval of the unitholders of FIG at such meeting, all as described in the Circular.

FIG.PR.A was last mentioned on PrefBlog when the first attempt to approve the merger did not get quorum. FIG.PR.A is tracked by HIMIPref™ but is relegated to the Scraps Index on credit concerns.

Issue Comments

NEW.PR.C To Get Bigger

NewGrowth Corp. has announced:

that the Company has issued one warrant for each Capital Share held by holders of Capital Shares of the Company of record as at the close of business on September 17, 2010.

Each warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one Unit, each Unit consisting of one Capital Share and one Preferred Share, for a subscription price of $41.57 per Unit. Commencing September 20, 2010, warrants may be exercised at any time on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on March 31, 2011. The warrants are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol NEW.WT.

Holders of the Preferred Shares are entitled to receive quarterly fixed cumulative dividends equal to $0.2055 per Preferred Share. The Company’s Capital Share dividend policy is to pay holders of Capital Shares quarterly dividends in an amount equal to the revenue received by the Company on the underlying portfolio securities minus the dividends payable on the Preferred Shares and all administrative and operating expenses provided the net asset value per Unit at the time of declaration, after giving effect to the dividend, would be greater than the original issue price of the Preferred Shares.

NewGrowth Corp. is a mutual fund corporation whose investment portfolio consists of publicly-listed securities of selected Canadian chartered banks, telecommunication, pipeline and utility issuers. The Capital Shares and Preferred Shares of NewGrowth Corp. are both listed for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols NEW.A and NEW.PR.C respectively.

The warrants will be outstanding for more than six months!

NEW.PR.C was last mentioned on PrefBlog when it started trading 2009-6-26. There are only 2.2-million of the $13.70 preferreds outstanding, so the issue won’t be tracked by HIMIPref™ any time soon.

Issue Comments

DBRS Discontinues ELF Rating

DBRS has announced that it:

has today announced that it will discontinue its public rating on the First Preference Shares, Series 1 of E-L Financial Corporation Limited (E-L) on October 20, 2010 (30 days from today).

DBRS notes that this action is unrelated to E-L’s credit profile.

ELF has two issues of preferreds outstanding, both PerpetualDiscounts: ELF.PR.F & ELF.PR.G. The issues have been rated Pfd-2(low) by DBRS for a long time, contrasted with S&P’s ratings of P-2(high)/BBB+.

I don’t see any other news – and remember, ELF is probably the largest public company in Canada, if not North America, that doesn’t have a website – so it’s hard to guess what this might mean. It could be a signal that a new issue is on its way and ELF didn’t feel like cutting more cheques to DBRS.

Contingent Capital

Contingent Capital Update

A Reuters columnist suggested Big banks winners from new contingent capital move:

Plans to make hybrid bond investors share the pain when banks run into trouble could polarise the financial sector into big firms that can afford to pay up for capital and smaller players that cannot.

But these plans from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision could reinforce a pattern emerging in the aftermath of the crisis — a two-tier banking market with international banks that investors favour over smaller banks seen as riskier.

“It could polarise the market further in terms of issuer access and could shut out some smaller institutions and give larger firms a competitive advantage,” said one debt capital markets banker at a major international banking group.

I don’t think that this is necessarily the case. Small banks in the US have never been able to issue their own non-equity regulatory capital – it has all been repackaged into CDOs. This was one of the sideswipes of the Panic of 2007 – the CDO market froze up and these smaller banks were unable to issue.

Investors have mixed views on contingent capital. They would have problems with more issues along the lines of bonds sold by British bank Lloyds, which are designed to convert to equity in the early stages of a bank running into difficulties.

“We don’t think there is a large market for them, certainly among institutional bond investors,” said Roger Doig, credit analyst at Schroders. Analysts say that such issues are difficult for credit rating agencies to evaluate and many institutional credit investors are not mandated to hold equity.

Well, we will see. It’s not fair focussing on the poorly structure Lloyds ECN issue as that gave no first-loss protection to holders.

The McDonald CoCos are not only much better structured and better investments, but they will also work better in averting a crisis, rather than helping to clean up.

Stan Maes and William Schoutens provide Contingent Capital: An In-Depth Discussion:

Somewhat paradoxically, funded contingent capital or CoCos may actually increase the systemic risks they are intended to reduce. For example, whereas some banking regulators recorded CoCos as capital, some insurance regulators treated them as debt. Hence, significant amounts of CoCos were held by insurers, creating a risk of contagion from the banking sector to the insurance sector. Also a problem of moral hazard arises. Taking excessive risks (by for example buying additional risky assets) could lead to a triggering of the note and hence the wiping out of a lot of outstanding debt. Banks with contingent debt could therefore be tempted to seek additional risk near the trigger point (taking risk on the back of the CoCo holders and maybe taxpayers as well).

Finally, Hart and Zingales (2010) argue that contingent capital introduces inefficiency as conversion eliminates default, which forces inefficient businesses to restructure and incompetent managers to be replaced.

Allowing CoCos to be held as assets by other financial institutions and risk-weighted as debt is just stupid. I won’t waste time discussing stupidity.

Given the above, it may make a lot of sense to define triggers in terms of market based terms. Note however that a simple market based trigger may not be desirable as short sellers may be tempted to push down the stock price in order to profit from the resulting dilution of the bank’s stock following the conversion triggered by the stock price drop. Such a self-generated decline in shares prices is referred to as a “death spiral”. The above problem can be mitigated by making the trigger dependent on a rolling average stock price (say the average closing price of the stock over the preceding 20 business days, as Duffie (2010) and Goodhart (2010) propose). In fact, Flannery (2009) demonstrates that the incentive for speculative attack is lessened or even eliminated altogether by setting a sufficiently high contractual conversion price, such that the conversion becomes anti-dilutive (raising the price of the share rather than lowering it).

A market based trigger has the additional advantage that it limits the ability of management to engage in balance sheet manipulation. Also, it prevents forbearance on behalf of the regulators, as it eliminates regulatory discretion in deciding when the trigger should be invoked. Some analysts refer to the double trigger as the double disaster (regulatory discretion as well as politics).

My own preference is for the Volume Weighted Average Price over a relatively lengthy period (20 trading days?) to be the trigger.

If the conversion ratio is based on the stock price at the time of the triggering point, the amount of capital to be brought in can be very substantial and will make thecounterparty a major, if not the largest, shareholder. Original shareholders will be diluted. On the one hand, there is a clear potential dilution effect which could affect the bank’s equity price itself. On the other hand, CoCos may as well introduce a floor on the equity price in these situations.

When the conversion ratio is determined at the time of conversion and not at the time of issuance, the conversion is likely to be relatively generous to the holder of the contingent capital instrument. When the debt holders can expect to get out at close to par value, it would reduce the cost of the contingent capital instrument, making it a significantly cheaper form of capital than equity (of course its low coupon would reduce investors’ appetite).

The authors close with:

We close by raising concerns about the pricing of the instruments by highlighting the similarities between CoCos and equity barrier options and credit default swaps. These barrier-like features and the fact that CoCos are fat-tail event claims, in combination with calibration and model risks, imply that these contingent instruments are very hard to value under a particular model. Since CoCos are expected not to be highly liquid instruments (and until real market prices are widely available), the extreme complexity of mark to modeling CoCos will be a big disadvantage that may hamper their success.

Market Action

September 17, 2010

Ireland needs some green:

Treasuries rose while the cost to insure Irish government bonds jumped to a record amid concern that Europe’s debt crisis is worsening and American consumer confidence is slumping.

The yield on the 10-year Irish bond surged 26 basis points to 6.29 percent in London. The spread with German bunds widened to as much as 389 basis points, or 3.89 percentage points, the most on record, according to Bloomberg generic data.

Corporate creditworthiness in Europe is the best ever compared with governments, credit-default swap prices show, as companies cut debt while governments struggle with budget deficits.

The difference between the Markit iTraxx Europe Index of corporate credit-default swaps and the Markit iTraxx SovX Western Europe Index of contracts tied to government debt widened 1 basis point to a record 49, according to data from CMA and JPMorgan Chase & Co.

I don’t think there’s much need to worry. I think all those patriotic Americans who funded the IRA back in the eighties will be overjoyed to cut cheques to help out the old country.

Speaking of Europe, there’s a very good article on Greece, with the obligatory “It’s all Goldman Sachs’ fault” paragraph in the middle, by Michael Lewis, titled Beware of Greeks bearing bonds (hat tip: Financial Webring Forum).

A day of big volume on the Canadian preferred share market, with very strong returns: PerpetualDiscounts were up 45bp and FixedResets gained 12bp.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0554 % 2,094.9
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0554 % 3,173.6
Floater 2.91 % 3.37 % 69,826 18.83 3 0.0554 % 2,262.0
OpRet 4.85 % 0.59 % 86,715 0.20 9 0.2304 % 2,389.3
SplitShare 5.86 % -33.52 % 63,365 0.09 2 1.0215 % 2,400.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2304 % 2,184.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.69 % 5.32 % 136,547 5.36 14 0.2550 % 1,988.8
Perpetual-Discount 5.54 % 5.64 % 189,904 14.41 63 0.4514 % 1,963.3
FixedReset 5.23 % 3.00 % 289,142 3.31 47 0.1245 % 2,273.7
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
GWO.PR.G Perpetual-Discount 1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 22.87
Evaluated at bid price : 23.10
Bid-YTW : 5.64 %
RY.PR.E Perpetual-Discount 1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 21.59
Evaluated at bid price : 21.59
Bid-YTW : 5.27 %
ELF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 22.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.36
Bid-YTW : 6.02 %
RY.PR.C Perpetual-Discount 1.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 21.90
Evaluated at bid price : 22.02
Bid-YTW : 5.27 %
PWF.PR.K Perpetual-Discount 1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 21.72
Evaluated at bid price : 22.07
Bid-YTW : 5.68 %
PWF.PR.E Perpetual-Discount 1.24 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 23.29
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 5.64 %
PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Discount 1.43 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 22.48
Evaluated at bid price : 22.64
Bid-YTW : 5.71 %
RY.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.44 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 21.52
Evaluated at bid price : 21.83
Bid-YTW : 5.13 %
HSB.PR.C Perpetual-Discount 1.61 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 23.09
Evaluated at bid price : 23.32
Bid-YTW : 5.48 %
BMO.PR.J Perpetual-Discount 1.66 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 21.93
Evaluated at bid price : 22.05
Bid-YTW : 5.15 %
RY.PR.B Perpetual-Discount 1.66 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 22.44
Evaluated at bid price : 22.60
Bid-YTW : 5.25 %
BNA.PR.C SplitShare 1.81 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2019-01-10
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.45
Bid-YTW : 5.98 %
HSB.PR.D Perpetual-Discount 1.88 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 23.04
Evaluated at bid price : 23.25
Bid-YTW : 5.39 %
BAM.PR.I OpRet 2.98 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-10-17
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 26.98
Bid-YTW : -55.95 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
GWL.PR.O Perpetual-Premium 116,835 Called for redemption.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-11-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.26
Bid-YTW : 2.97 %
MFC.PR.A OpRet 98,521 RBC bought 17,500 from anonymous at 25.20 and 10,900 from Nesbitt at the same price. Desjardins crossed 25,000 at 25.18.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2015-12-18
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.20
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
CM.PR.L FixedReset 86,160 RBC bought two blocks of 11,000 each from anonymous, both at 28.45. RBC bought 10,000 from Desjardins at the same price. RBC crossed 13,400 at the same price again.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 28.42
Bid-YTW : 2.85 %
BNS.PR.L Perpetual-Discount 83,789 RBC crossed blocks of 25,000 and 35,000, both at 21.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 21.46
Evaluated at bid price : 21.78
Bid-YTW : 5.23 %
MFC.PR.B Perpetual-Discount 76,473 Nesbitt crossed blocks of 17,400 and 46,800, both at 19.98.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-17
Maturity Price : 19.92
Evaluated at bid price : 19.92
Bid-YTW : 5.88 %
HSB.PR.E FixedReset 68,766 RBC bought two blocks of 10,000 each from HSBC, both at 28.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 28.05
Bid-YTW : 3.21 %
There were 65 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Market Action

September 16, 2010

Nothing happened today.

Volume was very good on the Canadian preferred share market, while PerpetualDiscounts were up 9bp and FixedResets gained 10bp – although the vagaries of the index calculations meant that the reported yield for FixedResets crept up 2bp (returns are a mean; YTW is a median). MFC issues were, for a change, missing from both the performance and volume highlights.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1660 % 2,093.8
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1660 % 3,171.8
Floater 2.91 % 3.38 % 65,384 18.80 3 -0.1660 % 2,260.7
OpRet 4.86 % 0.58 % 86,382 0.20 9 0.2910 % 2,383.8
SplitShare 5.92 % -29.91 % 61,605 0.09 2 0.4103 % 2,376.3
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2910 % 2,179.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.71 % 5.40 % 126,968 5.36 14 -0.1148 % 1,983.7
Perpetual-Discount 5.57 % 5.65 % 190,951 14.39 63 0.0862 % 1,954.5
FixedReset 5.24 % 3.06 % 292,068 3.31 47 0.1020 % 2,270.9
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
POW.PR.D Perpetual-Discount -1.85 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-16
Maturity Price : 22.11
Evaluated at bid price : 22.25
Bid-YTW : 5.72 %
BMO.PR.L Perpetual-Premium -1.34 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.70
Bid-YTW : 5.40 %
RY.PR.W Perpetual-Discount 1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-16
Maturity Price : 23.35
Evaluated at bid price : 23.60
Bid-YTW : 5.23 %
BAM.PR.I OpRet 1.95 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-10-16
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : -27.95 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
SLF.PR.C Perpetual-Discount 168,500 Nesbitt crossed blocks of 100,000 and 29,000, both at 19.70. Desjardins crossed 11,800 at 19.59.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-09-16
Maturity Price : 19.69
Evaluated at bid price : 19.69
Bid-YTW : 5.68 %
TD.PR.K FixedReset 95,085 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 28.17; TD crossed 10,600 at the same price; Desjardins crossed 13,200 at the same price again.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 28.16
Bid-YTW : 3.08 %
RY.PR.Y FixedReset 87,500 Nesbitt crossed 85,000 at 28.12.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-12-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 28.08
Bid-YTW : 3.12 %
CM.PR.K FixedReset 73,574 National crossed 10,900 at 27.62. TD crossed 13,600 at 27.55 and RBC crossed 35,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.50
Bid-YTW : 2.80 %
RY.PR.R FixedReset 71,650 RBC crossed 48,100 at 27.85; Desjardins crossed 17,500 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.86
Bid-YTW : 2.97 %
BMO.PR.N FixedReset 65,550 TD crossed 53,800 at 28.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-27
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 28.28
Bid-YTW : 2.67 %
There were 50 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.