Archive for August, 2007

August 9, 2007

Thursday, August 9th, 2007

The markets giveth and the markets taketh away.

The trouble started in Europe, when BNP Paribas halted redemptions on some hedge funds, due to an inability to find a bid on some of their holdings.

“The complete evaporation of liquidity in certain market segments of the U.S. securitization market has made it impossible to value certain assets fairly regardless of their quality or credit rating,” BNP Paribas said in a statement.

This caused panic – or, at least, a major recalculation of just how bad things actually are. Overnight LIBOR increased 53bp and the European Central Bank stepped up to flood the system with cash. There is, as yet, no word on whether they have started renting helicopters. Similarly, the Fed pumped in liquidity (albeit not so much) and the Bank of Canada proudly announced that its employees showed up for work today.

The stock market did not like being reminded of sub-prime and showed its displeasure in both the US and Canada. The market is so upset that it has been knocked back all the way to where it was on Monday at about 2pm:

As might be imagined, the bond markets did interesting things. The flood of short-term money from the central banks sent two-year Treasury yields sharply lower. Fears that this money might fuel inflation steepened the curve considerably, both in the US and Canada. It would be really, really nice to see a decent term premium again, y’know? The WSJ has a round-up of reactions to the liquidity pumping.

Thirty-day Fed-Fund Futures are now indicating a rate of 5.20% for August and 4.73% for next February, but it’s an open question about how reliable this predictor is. There’s a lot of arbitrage problems with this contract – it’s hard to short Treasury Bills – as well as segmentation problems.

In stories of continuing interest, Joseph Stiglitz blames the sub-prime mess on Greenspan & Bush and Brad Setser has some things to say about China’s Reserve Policy sabre-rattling.

The preferred share market saw increased volumes today – back to normal levels, perhaps even normal+, with three issues trading in excess of 100,000 shares without being internal crosses or dividend capture plays.

PerpetualDiscount managed to squeak out another daily gain, while perpetualPremiums fell a bit, but nothing too exciting.

In keeping with the “flight to quality” theme, a number of lower-rated issues not included in the indices performed poorly today: NTL.PR.G, -2.89%; HPF.PR.B, -1.71%; DC.PR.A, -1.66%; EPP.PR.A, -1.45%; NTL.PR.F, -1.16%; and our friend from yesterday, YPG.PR.B, -1.14%. I will note that DBRS rates HPF.PR.B as Pfd-2(low), but I don’t understand why.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.75% 4.78% 29,515 15.96 1 +0.0410% 1,045.0
Fixed-Floater 4.99% 4.98% 127,739 14.19 8 -0.1018% 1,020.9
Floater 4.88% 0.33% 74,315 8.18 4 -0.1992% 1,048.6
Op. Retract 4.82% 3.89% 83,087 2.95 16 +0.1512% 1,024.4
Split-Share 5.04% 4.64% 101,688 3.91 15 -0.0949% 1,045.9
Interest Bearing 6.25% 6.71% 64,530 4.62 3 -0.7418% 1,032.2
Perpetual-Premium 5.53% 5.18% 101,910 5.65 24 -0.0459% 1,024.2
Perpetual-Discount 5.07% 5.11% 309,389 15.32 39 +0.0278% 977.5
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing -1.7989% Very volatile lately! Asset coverage is down to 1.86:1 as of August 3, down from 1.97:1 on July 13. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.47% based on a bid of 9.28 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount -1.4151% So much for yesterday’s gains! Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.77% based on a bid of 20.90 and a limitMaturity.
WFS.PR.A SplitShare -1.0721% Probably the “World Financial” part of its name that did it! Had asset coverage of 2.13:1 as of July 31. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.02% based on a bid of 10.15 and a hardMaturity 2011-6-30 at 10.00.
PWF.PR.J OpRet +1.0074% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.93% based on a bid of 26.07 and either a call 2009-5-30 at 25.75 OR a softMaturity 2013-7-30 at 25.00. Take your pick. Anything in between will be pretty much the same as well.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
GWO.PR.X OpRet 262,683 Nesbitt crossed 200,000 at 26.85, then another 50,000 at the same price. Nice tickets! Assiduous readers will remember my fascination with this issue. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.68% based on a bid of 26.66 and a call 2009-10-30 at 26.00. Or a whopping 3.70% if it hangs on until its softMaturity 2013-9-29 at 25.00. That’s 5.15% interest equivalent. I suppose that’s OK, but you can get slightly over 5% on a bank deposit note for about the same term, and about 5.4% on GWL 10-year paper … so why give up seniority AND increase negative convexity? Some things in this life puzzle me.
TD.PR.N OpRet 103,400 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 25.85. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.07% based on a bid of 25.81 and a softMaturity 2014-1-30 at 25.00.
TD.PR.M OpRet 102,500 The busy boys at Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 26.11. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.91% based on a bid of 26.14 and a softMaturity 2013-10-30 at 25.00.
BNS.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 67,830 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 23.06. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.92% based on a bid of 23.00 and a limitMaturity.
GWO.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 64,939 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.05% based on a bid of 22.56 and a limitMaturity.

There were twenty-six other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

August 8, 2007

Wednesday, August 8th, 2007

OK, everybody, we can relax now! George W. Bush has stated “I’m not an economist, but my hope is that the market, if it functions normally, will be able to yield a soft landing. That’s kind of what it looks like so far.”  The equity markets immediately responded with a huge advances, both in the US and in Canada.

Sub-prime is old news, as evidenced by the fact that the IMF is pontifficating on the subject. The Europeans say investors can take their lumps anyway. Of far greater interest is rumblings from China that they may be willing, under certain circumstances, to flex their treasury muscle and use their currency reserves as a political weapon. Bush says that this would be foolhardy, and it’s therefore surprising that anybody is still taking the threat seriously. But … there is some concern the Fed doesn’t have the same influence over longer-term rates that it used to. Tom Graff has some comments and I have previously noted the effect of Chinese investment on Treasuries. Their trade surplus rose again in July, so they’ve got plenty of ammunition.

Treasuries got thumped, and whether that’s a rebound of the flight to quality or a China Syndrome is a matter of taste. Canadas followed Treasuries, unnoticed by media and bloggers.

The Wall Street Murdoch is Magnificent Journal posted an interesting comparison of credit markets, now vs. the LCTM blow-up. Given the state of economic education, however, nobody will notice.

It was a good day in pref-land, with volume picking up a bit and numerous “Scraps” issues (those not included in the indices due to either low volume or poor credit) gaining over 1% in price (bid / bid). The PerpetualDiscount index continued to shine and – who knows – might even make it back to its 2006-6-30 level of 1,000.00 before too long.

BAM had an interesting day, with two of its floating-rate issues and one of its perpetualDiscounts gaining over 1% (bid / bid). There seems to have been some pickup in activity in the BAM.PR.M / BAM.PR.N issues but whether this is meaningful remains to be seen. The fund has a position! An attractive yield, anyway – but I will confess I don’t know how many, if any, the underwriters of BAM.PR.N still have to unload. Certain the blow-out sale on EPP.PR.A I was told about has fizzled – the issue immediately started trading below the price I was told and has remained there since.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.76% 4.79% 29,027 15.94 1 +0.7842% 1,044.6
Fixed-Floater 4.98% 5.00% 128,065 14.18 8 -0.1729% 1,022.0
Floater 4.87% 0.32% 72,172 8.22 4 +0.9444% 1,050.7
Op. Retract 4.83% 4.07% 81,890 3.43 16 -0.0089% 1,022.9
Split-Share 5.04% 4.58% 103,213 3.91 15 -0.0171% 1,046.9
Interest Bearing 6.20% 6.58% 62,625 4.65 3 +0.7230% 1,039.9
Perpetual-Premium 5.52% 5.20% 102,727 5.65 24 +0.0182% 1,024.7
Perpetual-Discount 5.07% 5.11% 308,888 15.32 39 +0.1314% 977.3
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat -1.0305%  
BNS.PR.M PerpetualDiscount +1.0545% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.92% based on a bid of 23.00 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.B Floater +1.1438% Pays 70% of Canadian Prime; currently redeemable at $25.00; now bid at 24.76.
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount +1.1933% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.68% based on a bid of 21.20 and a limitMaturity. The virtually identical BAM.PR.N issue is bid at 20.62 for a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.84, and its redemption period starts six months later.
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing +1.6129% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.15% (as interest) based on a bid of 9.45 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00
BAM.PR.K Floater +2.6217% Pays 70% of Canada Prime, currently redeemable at 25.00, now bid at 24.66
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
BNS.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 94,840 National Bank crossed 70,000 at 23.00. Also a big price-mover – see above.
RY.PR.G PerpetualDiscount 56,060 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.98% based on a bid of 22.65 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 31,230 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.10% based on a bid of 23.19 and a limitMaturity.
BNS.PR.L PerpetualDiscount 17,360 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.93% based on a bid of 22.95 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 15,060 Also a big price-mover – see above.

There were sixteen other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

BCE.PR.A / BCE.PR.B : Fixed-Rate Dividend Set

Wednesday, August 8th, 2007

BCE has announced:

BCE Inc. will, on September 1, 2007, continue to have Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AA (“Series AA Preferred Shares”) outstanding if holders of at least 2.5 million of its Series AA Preferred Shares elect not to convert such shares into Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AB by August 22, 2007. In such a case, as of September 1, 2007, the Series AA Preferred Shares will pay, on a quarterly basis, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE Inc., a fixed cash dividend of $0.300000 based on an annual dividend rate of 4.800% for the five-year period beginning on September 1, 2007.

As previously discussed, the Teachers’ bid includes cancellation of BCE.PR.A (the fixed rate) for $25.76 and of BCE.PR.B (the ratchet rate) for $25.50.

BCE.PR.B does not currently exist; according to the prospectus the initial rate will be 80% of prime, ratcheted. If we assume that two dividends will be paid prior to cancellation and that this rate increases at the maximum speed of 4% per month and that prime continues to be 6.25%, then we arrive at an average rate of 90% of prime, which is 5.625%, which is dividends per share of about $0.70.

Two dividends on the “A” at 4.80% will come to $0.60.

Thus, if one were absolutely sure that the Teachers bid will take be consumated as advertised, one would stick with the BCE.PR.A at 4.80%.

I’m not convinced, though. I think there is a significant chance that the bid will not be completed as currently envisaged and that the preferred shares will continue to exist in some form or another at a reduced credit rating. Should this come to pass, a ratcheting floater will almost certainly be much more valuable than a 4.80% fixed rate to be reset/exchange in 2012. Given that the potential reward for keeping the BCE.PR.A issue is so low – only sixteen cents per share, net – I believe that the risk/reward profile makes conversion to BCE.PR.B the path of prudence.

Others may disagree!

August 7, 2007

Tuesday, August 7th, 2007

It was a day of mixed indicators, with frenzied traders choosing random bits of data and making bets on them! US equities rose again, continuing a huge rise from yesterday while all sensible people were on holiday, on the very good rationale that the Fed says the economy is growing enough that the main risk is inflation. It therefore makes all kinds of sense that Canadian equities fell on fears that the US Economy is slowing, doesn’t it? Is the glass half-empty or half-full? I guess it depends how far away you are from the glass.

The US Treasury market did homage to the Fed statement as well, falling a bit – not much – as traders appeared to take the view that the expected rate cut will take longer to arrive than expected. Torn between the domestic equity market and the Treasury market, Canadian bonds declined a bit, but nothing to write home about.

The knock-on effects of tighter credit in the wake of the sub-prime frenzy are showing amongst those firms attempting to finance share buy-backs in the bond market. Bear Stearns, which has been caught up in this debacle more than it would probably like to, has indicated it will not be buying back shares, has paid up big-time to get some five-year money to reduce dependence on the money-market, and gotten rid of a high-ranking executive. Sounds like they’re taking things seriously!

The Fed statement today was notable for more than the usual reasons. There was a rare mention of the global economy, and its role in buying American stuff rather than selling cheap stuff to Americans. There is some further comment to the effect that American productivity growth is slowing. Meanwhile, there are rumblings that maybe Greenspan should be blamed for sub-prime and that US officials think the market is always perfect.

All in all, an interesting day!

Not the most active of days in the preferred share market, but at least trading was more inspired than it was Friday. InterestBearing issues did well and the PerpetualDiscount index continued what has been a fairly steady grind upwards since mid-July.

A number of Pfd-3 and worse issues did horribly, with YPG.PR.B, for instance, hitting a new low. It can only be detected over long periods of time … but yes, the preferred market does eventually  reflect the bond market! YPG.PR.B now yields 6.48% based on a bid of 22.60 and a softMaturity 2017-6-29 at 25.00 … not bad! At a conversion factor of 1.4, that’s equivalent to interest of over 9% …. but it’s a Pfd-3(high). Suitable only in very sparing quantities!

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.81% 4.85% 27,128 15.86 1 +0.2482% 1,036.4
Fixed-Floater 4.97% 5.01% 129,589 14.17 8 -0.0460% 1,023.7
Floater 4.91% 0.39% 72,604 8.06 4 -0.8811% 1,040.9
Op. Retract 4.83% 4.04% 82,423 3.32 16 +0.0513% 1,023.0
Split-Share 5.03% 4.57% 105,271 3.91 15 -0.1268% 1,047.1
Interest Bearing 6.25% 6.70% 62,501 4.63 3 +0.7609% 1,032.4
Perpetual-Premium 5.52% 5.20% 102,767 5.65 24 -0.0325% 1,024.5
Perpetual-Discount 5.08% 5.11% 310,171 15.04 39 +0.0904% 976.0
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.K FixFloat -2.8306%  
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing +1.0870% Continuing the recovery from Thursday’s loss. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.42% based on a bid of 9.30 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
RY.PR.E PerpetualDiscount +1.1008% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.91% based on a bid of 22.96 and a limitMaturity.
FIG.PR.A InterestBearing +1.1244% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.56% (as interest) based on a bid of 9.91 and a hardMaturity 2014-12-31 at 10.00.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
BMO.PR.I OpRet 75,550 Scotia crossed 74,200 at 25.00. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.07% based on a bid of 25.00 and a call 2007-12-25 (give or take a few days!) at 25.00.
BAM.PR.H OpRet 50,691 Desjardins crossed 50,000 at 26.70. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.04% based on a bid of 26.69 and a call 2008-10-30 at 25.75. It would appear that there are some who feel the privilege of early call will not be exercised!
GWO.PR.F PerpetualPremium 50,570 Desjardins crossed 49,700 at 26.85. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.52% based on a bid of 26.83 and a call 2008-10-30 at 26.00. Another bet on call-waiving!
CM.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 18,710 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.12% based on a bid of 23.11 and a limitMaturity.
BCE.PR.A FixFloat 18,298 Scotia bought 10,000 from National Bank at 24.49.

There were twelve other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

FIG.PR.A Partial Redemption

Monday, August 6th, 2007

Better late than never! In a press release dated July 4, Faircourt Income & Growth Split Trust announced:

After giving effect to the redemption of the Trust Units, and in order to maintain appropriate balance in the fund between the Trust Units and Preferred Securities, the Manager announces that $45,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Trust’s 6.25% outstanding Preferred Securities (the “Preferred Securities”) will be redeemed on August 3, 2007 (the “Redemption Date”).

Interestingly, this press release is not to be found on the fund’s website.

The proportion of preferred securities redeemed is slightly over 25% of the total.

I noted the high yield available on this issue in the June Index Review – with the redemption, a lot of that yield has been received earlier than anticipated!

Update, 2007-08-11: The last commentary regarding this issue had to do with the DBRS credit review. There appears to have been some kind of oversight at DBRS – the issue is still “Under Review – Developing”

August 3, 2007

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

It turned out that the end of the world, previously thought to have been cancelled, was merely postponed; a few proponents of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (strong form) received bruises in the rush to the exits but, as they themselves noted, they probably would have got them anyway.

The day started well for fixed-income investors, with the Non-Farm Payrolls report showing that 92,000 jobs were created while unemployment crept up a fraction. James Hamilton at Econbrowser says it actually be worse than it looks, since it does not go far enough to contradict his other indicators. Other reactions have been compiled by the Wall Street Murdoch is Magnificent Journal.

The report was weak enough that even hawkish economists conceded a rate-increase might be further off than anticipated so Treasuries had a great day, closely followed by Canadas.

This exuberance does not extend to lending money to actual companies, however, especially not those involved in sourcing, packaging and selling mortgages. Employees of such firms hoping to get work processing redemptions from hedge funds were disappointed when another European fund halted redemptions.

All this crushed US stocks, while Canada had to deal not only with the US news, but also the fact that it doesn’t look like we’ll be able to go work at Telus, either. So Canada got squashed.

Speaking of Telus, they released their quarterlies today, and noted:

TELUS in July continued its assessment of whether it should potentially make a competing offer for BCE. TELUS has concluded this assessment and it does not intend to submit a competing offer to acquire BCE.

I’m still not convinced that Teachers / BCE story is over yet. I have convinced myself, however, that the secret of happiness is putting oneself into a position of not caring. Which is to say, not holding BCE Prefs.

Meanwhile, the preferred share market simply continued not reacting much to anything at all, but there was one notable exception. The Argus Preferreds, AR.PR.B, are tracked by HIMIPref™ for the very good reason that about ten years ago they were in an index for ten minutes. They were down 63.69% today (bid/bid) on no volume, as the already pathetic bid vanished. To be perfectly frank, I don’t know off the top of my head who owns Argus. Is it the soon to be bankrupt Hollinger or the soon to be jailed Lord Black? Whatever … this issue hasn’t paid its dividend for over two years, so it will be of interest only to hedge funds and scrip collectors.

The post regarding Malachite’s recent performance has been updated with figures for DPS.UN and a joke, so read it again. Read it many times!

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.84% 4.87% 28,131 15.82 1 -0.1652% 1,033.9
Fixed-Floater 4.97% 5.02% 130,092 14.15 8 -0.3249% 1,024.2
Floater 4.87% 0.39% 73,752 8.22 4 +0.0206% 1,050.1
Op. Retract 4.83% 3.94% 83,551 3.44 16 +0.0450% 1,022.5
Split-Share 5.03% 4.49% 106,471 3.92 15 +0.2070% 1,048.4
Interest Bearing 6.29% 6.82% 61,292 4.63 3 +0.3859% 1,024.6
Perpetual-Premium 5.52% 5.17% 103,376 5.66 24 -0.0270% 1,024.8
Perpetual-Discount 5.08% 5.11% 313,647 15.31 39 +0.0577% 975.1
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat -1.4622%  
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing +1.4333% Recovering about half of yesterday’s loss. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.59% based on a bid of 9.20 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
GWO.PR.I PerpetualDiscount +1.5922% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.95% based on a bid of 22.97 and a limitMaturity.
CFS.PR.A SplitShare +3.4895% Flight to quality with a vengeance! Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.40% (less than today’s gain!) based on a bid of 10.38 and a hardMaturity 2012-1-31 at 10.00.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
ACO.PR.A OpRet 78,070 Global crossed 38,800 at 27.34 for cash at 27.34, then the same amount for regular settlement at 26.98. Ex-Dividend today for 0.359375.
BCE.PR.I FixFloat 26,640  
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat 16,978  
CM.PR.P PerpetualPremium 10,250 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.85% based on a bid of 25.81 and a call 2012-11-28 at 25.00.

There were NO other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

Zip. Zero. Zilch. There weren’t even enough issues trading in size to fill a table with five prime examples.

HIMI Index Performance: July 2007

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

Performance of the HIMI Indices for July was:

Total Return, July 2007
Index Performance
Ratchet +8.24%
FixFloat +14.21%
Floater +0.06%
OpRet -0.10%
SplitShare +0.17%
Interest +0.03%
PerpetualPremium -0.03%
PerpetualDiscount +0.78%

Well – how about them fixed-floaters, eh? Or perhaps I should say “BCE Prefs”, since the FixedFloater index was comprised of eight issues in July, seven of which were BCE. It’s amazing what a generous takeover offer can do, eh? Especially since credit concerns had just about reached their peak on June 29 – the FixedFloater index was at 894.4 on June 29; above its low of 878.4 reached on June 11, but not by much!

The “Ratchet” index has been comprised solely of BCE issues throughout the period, but these fell less during the doldrums and hence had less ground to make up when Teachers’ gave the pref market its big boost.

As has been discussed elsewhere, the Claymore ETF returned -0.11% on the month; this number is after all fees and expenses and is after their rebalancing. I do not know what market action, if any, they took in order to reflect the index changes in their portolio … the current portfolio composition reflects at least some changes, but I do not know how completely the portfolio now reflects the index. It is also possible that they took no market action at all and the changes are due entirely to creation and destruction of units, with differing baskets. One can be reasonably sure, however, that changing their portfolio did not give their returns a trading-derived boost.

The same post has been updated with results for the other major passive preferred share fund listed on the TSX, DPS.UN. This fund returned (approximately; they do not report month-end NAVs) +1.38% on the month and -2.64% on the trailing three months. This fund has a higher weighting in the extremely volatile BCE prefs than does CPD.

Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund, actively managed by my firm, returned +0.55% on the month, +0.22% on the trailing three months. Returns assume reinvestment of dividends and are reported after expenses but before fees. Past performance is not  a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund or any other fund.

The return of the “BMO Capital Markets 50” in July was +1.33%, but this will not be analyzed in detail due to the proprietary nature of this index. It should suffice to note that this index has a higher weighting in BCE issues than does the S&P/TSX index.

 

BBD.PR.B / BBD.PR.D Arbitrage Closes

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

As fanatical devotees of the preferred share market will know, the two captioned issues are exchangeable into each other every five years … which gives rise to opportunities for arbitrage.

There are tax and liquidity headaches associated with this arbitrage, but it can be profitable – I have, for instance, received the following communication:

I can finally report that the BBD Pref B/D Arbitrage trades have finally closed.  I received the Pref B floating rate shares yesterday and swapped them into my shorting accounts to close out the positions today.  For 8-9 months, these trades returned a little over 10% annualized after costs — exactly as expected.  I see there are still 2.4M Pref D shares still outstanding, so we might get other arbitrage chances in the future.  Unlike my previous arbitrage trades of a couple of years ago when a $2.00 price difference evaporated in 2-3 months, this trade took the full period.  Indeed, the Aug 2 closing price difference of $1.60 is basically the same as when I started, so you could say the market is a wonderful forecaster!

So which pension fund wants to be first to give me a $50-million hedge fund mandate?

Update, 2007-08-10: The dividend going forward on the BBD.PR.D has been previously reported as 5.267%.

Update, 2007-08-12: I note from the Bombardier website that:

Following the conversion privilege of August 1, 2007, 82,736 Series 2 preferred shares were converted into 82,736 Series 3 preferred shares and 6,949,749 Series 3 preferred shares were converted into 6,949,749 Series 2 preferred shares.

Series 3 is BBD.PR.D, the Fixed-Rate element of the pair.

August 2, 2007

Thursday, August 2nd, 2007

Much to investors’ relief, the previously scheduled end of the world was cancelled today, which was considered good news for both American and Canadian equities. A good day all ’round, in fact, as Treasuries rose, dutifully followed by Canadas.

It is entirely possible that this exuberance has been caused by reports that Stephen Harper said there had been a lot of easy credit internationally, suggesting the recent turmoil was a reassessment of risk. We shall all sleep better tonight provided, of course, that the cheques resulting from massive redemptions of US Junk Funds don’t bounce. Meanwhile, Flaherty says he’s from the government and he’s here to help us.

Sub-Prime had a bad day amongst some indications that credit standards spiralled downwards over the past few years:

It makes one feel at least a little bit more sympathetic to the ratings agencies criticized for over-optimism!

Fed Funds contracts are showing a Fed easing ahead, but this is not necessarily a logical conclusion, especially considering that Europe might tighten.

Rio Tinto’s financing of its Alcan takeover is reported to be doing well.

As far as prefs are concerned … BSN.PR.A has been removed from the HIMIPref™ universe, due to its redemption.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.85% 4.88% 28,446 15.80 1 -0.3704% 1,035.6
Fixed-Floater 4.95% 5.01% 130,654 14.16 8 +0.6142% 1,027.6
Floater 4.87% -0.15% 75,136 8.20 4 -0.0197% 1,049.9
Op. Retract 4.84% 3.95% 84,865 3.29 16 +0.0008% 1,022.0
Split-Share 5.04% 4.56% 108,886 3.86 15 -0.0563% 1,046.2
Interest Bearing 6.32% 6.85% 62,002 4.62 3 -0.5324% 1,020.7
Perpetual-Premium 5.52% 5.17% 105,558 5.66 24 +0.0763% 1,025.1
Perpetual-Discount 5.08% 5.12% 320,279 15.31 39 -0.0660% 974.5
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing -2.4731% Even worse than yesterday, and now it’s just getting silly. It hit a new low of 8.40. Asset coverage is about 1.9:1 after a big hit in July. But it’s still not junk! Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.83% (as interest) based on a bid of 9.07 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
BAM.PR.N PerpetualDiscount -2.0515% Are the underwriters finally getting serious about clearing this out? New low today of 20.50. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.86% based on a bid of 20.53 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.A PerpetualDiscount -1.0667% Dropping back after yesterday’s gain. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.00% based on a bid of 22.26 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.G FixFloat +2.5717% Can we take this as meaning that the BAM.PR.N price doesn’t indicate revulsion at the Brookfield name?
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
RY.PR.K OpRet 97,510 RBC crossed 90,000 at 24.95. Callable at par commencing 2007-9-23; softMaturity 2008-8-23.
BNS.PR.J PerpetualPremium 52,971 Desjardins crossed 50,000 at 25.85. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.81% based on a bid of 25.66 and a call 2013-11-28 at 25.00.
BNS.PR.K PerpetualDiscount 26,070 RBC bought 10,000 from Nesbitt at 24.40. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.95% based on a bid of 24.37 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 18,975 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.10% based on a bid of 23.16 and a limitMaturity.
TD.PR.O PerpetualDiscount 16,750 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.97% based on a bid of 24.50 and a limitMaturity.

There were Ten other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

HIMI Index Rebalancing : July 31, 2007

Thursday, August 2nd, 2007

Not much change this time ’round, unlike June Month-End! Three issues were relegated to “Scraps” on volume concerns and the flow of PerpetualPremiums to PerpetualDiscount slowed to a bare trickle.

HIMI Index Changes, July 31, 2007
Issue From To Because
BNA.PR.B SplitShare Scraps Volume
PAY.PR.A SplitShare Scraps Volume
BCE.PR.H Ratchet Scraps Volume
PWF.PR.F PerpetualPremium PerpetualDiscount Price

As has previously been noted, CM.PR.C has been redeemed and removed from the PerpetualPremium index. Its last day of inclusion was July 31.

I will post about index performance and extreme issue performance at another time. I have already posted regarding MAPF Composition and MAPF Performance.