Category: Issue Comments

Issue Comments

DBRS: BN and BRN under Review-Positive

DBRS Limited (DBRS Morningstar) has announced:

placed the Issuer Rating, long-term obligations, and preferred shares credit ratings of Brookfield Corporation (BN or the Company, formerly Brookfield Asset Management Inc.) and its guaranteed subsidiaries Under Review with Positive Implications. In addition, DBRS Morningstar placed the short-term credit ratings of BN and its guaranteed subsidiaries Under Review with Developing Implications. These rating actions are not the result of any change in credit risk of the Company (or its guaranteed subsidiaries).

Following the annual surveillance review of the credit ratings of the Company on July 5, 2023, DBRS Morningstar identified an error in the application of certain methodologies used in the determination of the credit ratings of BN. DBRS Morningstar believes the rating rationale for the credit ratings of BN, and the applicable methodological approach, was not adequately disclosed previously. This error is not connected in any way to the data and information provided by the Company for the purposes of providing the relevant credit ratings.

Over the course of the coming weeks, DBRS Morningstar will conduct a review of the Company and the applicable methodological approach(es). Further to that review, DBRS Morningstar may apply additional or different DBRS Morningstar methodologies from those that have been applied in the past in the determination of the credit ratings of BN. Such methodologies may include the “Global Methodology for Rating Investment Management Companies” and the “Global Methodology for Rating Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations.” The application of a different methodological approach may result in changes in the level of one or more outstanding credit ratings of BN. DBRS Morningstar will provide information regarding the rationale for any such changes in connection with the announcement of the related credit rating actions.

Affected issues are (deep breath): BN.PF.A, BN.PF.B, BN.PF.C, BN.PF.D, BN.PF.E, BN.PF.F, BN.PF.G, BN.PF.H, BN.PF.I, BN.PF.J, BN.PF.K, BN.PF.L, BN.PR.B, BN.PR.C, BN.PR.K, BN.PR.M, BN.PR.N, BN.PR.R, BN.PR.T, BN.PR.X, BN.PR.Z and (this one not tracked by HIMIPref™) BRN.PR.A,

Issue Comments

TD.PF.K To Be Redeemed

The Toronto-Dominion Bank has announced:

that it will exercise its right to redeem all of its 16,000,000 outstanding Non-Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Class A First Preferred Shares, Series 20 (Non-Viability Contingent Capital) (the “Series 20 Shares”) on October 31, 2023 at the price of $25.00 per Series 20 Share for an aggregate total of approximately $400 million. The redemption has been approved by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions.

On August 24, 2023, TD announced that dividends of $0.296875 per Series 20 Share had been declared. These will be the final dividends on the Series 20 Shares, and will be paid in the usual manner on October 31, 2023 to shareholders of record on October 6, 2023, as previously announced. After October 31, 2023, the Series 20 Shares will cease to be entitled to dividends and the only remaining rights of holders of such shares will be to receive payment of the redemption amount.

Beneficial holders who are not directly the registered holder of Series 20 Shares should contact the financial institution, broker or other intermediary through which they hold these shares to confirm how they will receive their redemption proceeds. Inquiries should be directed to our Registrar and Transfer Agent, TSX Trust Company, at 1-800-387-0825 (or in Toronto 416-682-3860).

TD.PF.K was issued as a FixedReset, 4.75%+259 that commenced trading 2018-9-13 after being announced 2018-9-4. It is tracked by HIMIPref™ and is assigned to the FixedReset (Discount) subindex.

The redemption comes as quite a surprise, given that the closing price on 2023-9-22 was 21.79 with most VWAPs for September being below 22.00. It has been clear for a while that TD has been awash in excess capital since the Horizons deal was abandoned; in addition, OSFI has been twisting bank arms to get them to issue LRCNs and OTC preferreds. Still, I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall at the meeting where this redemption was approved by the bank!

Thanks to Assiduous Reader CanSiamCyp for bringing this to my attention!

Issue Comments

FTN.PR.A To Reset To 9.25% for One Year

Quadravest has announced:

Financial 15 Split Corp. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce the Preferred Share dividend rate for the fiscal year beginning December 1, 2023, will increase by 1.75% over the current rate. Monthly payments to FTN.PR.A will be $0.07708 per share for an annual yield of 9.25% on their $10 redemption value.

The Company invests in an actively managed, high quality portfolio consisting of 15 financial services companies made up of Canadian and U.S. issuers as follows:

Bank of Montreal National Bank of Canada Bank of America Corp.
The Bank of Nova Scotia Manulife Financial Corporation Citigroup Inc.
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Sun Life Financial Inc. Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Royal Bank of Canada Great-West Lifeco Inc. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
The Toronto-Dominion Bank CI Financial Corp. Wells Fargo & Co.

As I stated when reporting last year’s reset:

I must say, I am growing to dislike these annual resets intensely. The minimum rate on these resets is only 5.5% and apart from this the company has full discretion. A prudent analysis must therefore assume that next year the rate will reset to 5.5% but there is every possibility, of course, that it will not. So refusing to buy these things might result in leaving money on the table. All in all, though, assuming the worst is always the way to go in securities analysis!

FTN.PR.A matures 2025-12-1 and has a NAVPU of 16.82 as of 2023-9-15.

Thanks to Assiduous Reader newbiepref for bringing this to my attention!

Issue Comments

BK.PR.A Extending Term with Unchanged Dividend

Quadravest has announced:

Under the distribution policy announced in November 2021, … Preferred shareholders will receive prime plus 1.50% with a minimum rate of 5.00% and a maximum rate of 8.00%

As previously announced on March 2, 2023, the termination date of the Company was extended a futher five years from December 1, 2023 to December 1, 2028. In connection with the extension, the Company has the right to amend the annual rate of cumulative preferential monthly dividends to be paid to the BK.PR.A Preferred Shares for the five year renewal period, commencing December 1, 2023. In keeping with market yields for preferred shares with similar terms, there will be no change to the rate of the BK.PR.A Preferred Shares.

In relation to the term extension, the Company has an additional retraction right for those shareholders not wishing to continue holding their investment, allowing existing shareholders to tender one or both classes of Shares and receive a retraction price based on the November 30, 2023 net asset value per unit.

Alternatively, shareholders may sell their shares for the market price at any time, potentially at a higher price than would be achieved through retraction, or shareholders may take no action and continue to hold their shares.

Thanks to Assiduous Reader niagara for bringing this to my attention!

Issue Comments

FFN.PR.A To Reset To 9.50%

Quadravest has announced:

North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce the Preferred Share dividend rate for the fiscal year beginning December 1, 2023, will increase by 1.75% over the current rate. Monthly payments to FFN.PR.A will be $0.07917 per share for an annual yield of 9.50% on their $10 redemption value.

The Company invests in an actively managed, high quality portfolio consisting of 15 financial services companies made up of Canadian and U.S. issuers as follows:

Bank of Montreal National Bank of Canada Bank of America Corp.
The Bank of Nova Scotia Manulife Financial Corporation Citigroup Inc.
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Sun Life Financial Inc. Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Royal Bank of Canada Great-West Lifeco Inc. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
The Toronto-Dominion Bank CI Financial Corp. Wells Fargo & Co

I find I can’t much to say about this that’s better than what I said last year:

I must say, I am growing to dislike these annual resets intensely. The minimum rate on these resets is only 5.5% and apart from this the company has full discretion. A prudent analysis must therefore assume that next year the rate will reset to 5.5% but there is every possibility, of course, that it will not. So refusing to buy these things might result in leaving money on the table. All in all, though, assuming the worst is always the way to go in securities analysis!

And actually, these things mature next year, so when they (almost inevitably) extend the Capital Units and refund the preferreds, there’s no minimum … except that holders of the current version of FFN.PR.A will get a $10.00 retraction option if they don’t like the dividend on the reissued preferreds, assuming that the NAVPU is higher than that.

However, one point of interest is that the current NAVPU of the fund is only $13.81. So for the next year the fund will be paying dividends at the rate of 9.50% on the $10.00 par value of the preferreds, which is $0.95, which must be earned by a portfolio worth only $13.81 … meaning that to break even BEFORE FEES the portfolio has to earn 6.88% income. Given that their base management expense ratio is 0.92%, the portfolio has to earn 7.80% income just to pay their preferred shareholders. That’s a helluva drag, when according to DBRS:

Holders of the Preferred Shares used to receive cumulative monthly cash dividends at a rate of 6.75% annually until November 2022. However, with effect from December 1, 2022, this rate has been increased to 7.75% annually.

The current Preferred Share dividend coverage ratio is approximately 0.43 times (x). The average grind on the Portfolio is expected to be 5.3% annually for the next two years.

While an argument can be made that capital gains will save the day, I don’t see any reason to believe that their highly touted covered-call writing programme is going to make any net difference. As a point of interest, the cash weighting in the portfolio was 13% as of 2023-8-31.

Thanks to Assiduous Reader niagara for bringing this to my attention!

Issue Comments

ZPR: Serious Problems with Reset Date Bucketting

It looks like ZPR – BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF, a $1.5-billion fund, has been operating contrary to the terms of its prospectus and the promises of its advertising for a significant period.

In the September PrefLetter I reviewed the salient characteristics of the fund as part of a (mostly!) regular series, in which I review the key investment characteristics of ZPR and CPD. This allows those interested to review the composition of their own portfolios – or of Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund, which regularly reports the statistics in the same format – against those of the big funds, which may be taken as a reasonable approximation of the underlying indices. These articles may not be the most exciting things ever, but I found in November 2012 that the trading generated by the deletion of issues from the indices (due to insufficient trading volume) was sufficient to have the issues added back during the following revision. The index provider changed its rules the following month to stop this costly process (it appears that Solactive considered reinventing the wheel towards the end of 2017).

In the current review, an anomaly with ZPR was found with the ‘Reset Buckets’ of ZPR. These are supposed to be evenly weighted annually over the next five years, so that an equal value of the index resets over each year for the period, at which point the cycle begins again. This was not the case upon checking, though: in years measured from the evaluation date of 2023-7-31, PrefLetter’s table ZPR-6 showed that the highest weighted bucket was 1-2 years, with a weight of 26.46%, while the lowest weighted period, 3-4 Years, had a weight of 10.16%. That’s a lot of variance! Tabke ZPR-6A performed much the same calculation but with buckets defined by calendar years; issues resetting in 2024 had a weight of 27.15%, while 2027 came in at 11.55%.

The relative weights of the reset buckets were in much better alignment at the time of the 2020 ZPR Review: at that time the bucket weights ranged from a low of 16.72% to a high of 22.53%.

An analogous calculation is not available on ZPR’s main page, but fortuitously I found another report via another BMO page, which may be found by:
1. Go to the BMO ETF Dashboard at https://www.bmoetfs.ca
2. Type “Monthly Metrics” into the search box and search
3. The results page shows a link to “Monthly Metrics Summary – ZPR Canadian Preferred Shares”
4. Click to download the document.

This report shows the results of BMO’s analysis:

Reset Year Issues Weight
2023 11 8.30%
2024 49 26.93%
2025 36 21.73%
2026 17 12.92%
2027 21 11.85%
2028 24 18.28%
Portfolio 158 100.00%

Note that minor differences are expected between my figures and theirs, because:
i) I calculated as of 2023-7-31; BMO claims their “Data as of September 6th, 2023”
ii) I use bid prices; I believe BMO uses closing prices.

I surmise that the relatively low weightings for the 2026 and 2027 buckets developed from the wave of redemptions in 2021 and 2022. A quick count of my records indicates that 23 FixedResets were redeemed in each of these two years which will, of course, have affected the weightings for the bucket in which the next reset was supposed to take place.

But it is clear from their own analysis that BMO is not delivering what it has promised:

From the prospectus for ZPR:

Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index
The Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index includes preferred shares that generally have an adjustable dividend rate and are laddered using equal weights in annual reset term buckets. Securities are market capitalization weighted within the annual term buckets. Constituents are subject to minimum market capitalization, quality and liquidity screens. Further information about the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index and its constituent issuers is available from Solactive on its website at www.solactive.com.

BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
The investment strategy of BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF is currently to invest in and hold the constituent securities of the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index in the same proportion as they are reflected in the Index. The Manager may also use a sampling methodology in selecting investments for BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF to obtain exposure to the performance of the Index.

As an alternative to or in conjunction with investing in and holding all or some of the constituent securities of the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index, BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF may invest in or use Other Securities to obtain exposure to the performance of the Index.

BMO ETF Current Index Rebalancing and
Adjustment
BMO Laddered Preferred Share
Index ETF
Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred
Share Index
Rebalanced monthly

From BMO’s main page on ZPR:

Portfolio Strategy
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF has been designed to replicate, to the extent possible, the performance of the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index, net of expenses. The Fund invests in and holds the Constituent Securities of the Index in the same proportion as they are reflected in the Index.

Benchmark Info
The Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index includes Canadian preferred shares that meet size, liquidity, listing and quality criteria. The Index uses a five year laddered structure where annual buckets are equal weighted while constituent securities within each bucket are market capitalization weighted.

We can also look at the Index Provider’s (Solactive) role in this affair:

From the Solactive Methodology:

The Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index includes preferred shares that generally have an adjustable dividend rate and are laddered using equal weights in annual reset term buckets. Securities are market capitalization weighted within the annual term buckets. Constituents are subject to minimum market capitalization, quality and liquidity screens.

2.1 Selection of the Index Components
The initial composition of the Index as well as any ongoing adjustment is based on the following rules:
The Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index includes preferred shares that generally have an adjustable dividend rate and are laddered using equal weights in annual reset term buckets. Securities are market capitalization weighted within the annual term buckets. Constituents are subject to minimum market capitalization, quality and liquidity screens.

On the Selection Days, Solactive AG defines its Selection Universe. All instruments that fulfil the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Universe criteria stated under 4. are eligible for inclusion in the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index.

The preferred shares in the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Universe are clustered by their Maturity bucket. There are 5 Maturity buckets available: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and one bucket covering instruments for 0 and 5 years to maturity.

Each Maturity bucket (except from the bucket covering instruments for 0 and 5 years to maturity) must consist of at least 5 preferred shares. If less preferred shares are part of one bucket, than the bucket will be refilled with preferred shares that are closest to the respective Maturity bucket. If still less than 5 preferred shares are included in one bucket, the Index Committee will decide about the composition of the respective Maturity bucket.

2.3 Extraordinary adjustment
If an instrument included in Index is removed from the Index between Adjustment Days due to an Extraordinary Event, if necessary, the term bucket would be reweighted based on the market capitalization of the remaining issues. This is announced by Solactive AG after the close of business on the day on which the new composition of the Index was determined by the Committee. The Index is adjusted with one Business Day notice if possible.

In particular an “Extraordinary Event” is
– a Merger
– a Takeover bid
– a delisting
– the Nationalisation of a company
– Insolvency.

An Index Component is “delisted” if the Exchange announces pursuant to the Exchange regulations that the listing of, the trading in or the issuing of public quotes on the Index Component at the Exchange has ceased immediately or will cease at a later date, for whatever reason (provided delisting is not because of a Merger or a Takeover bid), and the Index Component is not immediately listed, traded or quoted again on an exchange, trading or listing system, acceptable to the Index Calculator,

But this is the Solactive announcement with respect to IAF.PR.I, which was redeemed effective 2023-3-31:

Redemption | IA FINANCIAL CORP INC NON-CUM CONV RED PERP PFD REGISTERED SHS A SERIES I | 3rd April 2023
Due to the redemption of IA FINANCIAL CORP INC NON-CUM CONV RED PERP PFD REGISTERED SHS A SERIES I, the following treatment will be applied to the following indices:

IA FINANCIAL CORP INC NON-CUM CONV RED PERP PFD REGISTERED SHS A SERIES I will be removed from the Index.
The weight of IA FINANCIAL CORP INC NON-CUM CONV RED PERP PFD REGISTERED SHS A SERIES I (IAF_pi.TO) based on its last close price will be distributed pro rata to remaining Index constituents.
Effective Date (open): 03/04/2023
Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index
Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index PR
Solactive Canadian Rate Reset Preferred Share Index (TR)

However, this announcement was not followed by the announcement of an “Extraordinary adjustment”, which would seem to be required by Section 2.3 quoted above. I have sent a query to Solactive.

But oddly enough, it’s hard to find anything that says explicitly that the so-called Maturity Buckets (they’re actually reset-date buckets!) are to be equally weighted and how this is to be accomplished, other than the general statement in the Index Specifications listed above. The closest I can find is:

1.6 Weighting
On each Adjustment Day each Index Component of the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index is weighted according to the Market Capitalization of the respective preferred share within the term buckets. The weights are capped twofold on a Selection day, whereas a cap on an issuer basis is applied of 12.5% per issuer on a selection day as well as a Cap of 20% per Maturity Bucket.

A “Cap of 20% per Maturity Bucket” sounds pretty good, but does that refer to the issuer weight within each bucket or the weight of the bucket relative to the total index? It’s not clear at all. There are only six references to “Maturity Bucket” in the entire document and section 1.6 is the only one that refers to anything like a cap.

So I currently have inquiries in at both BMO and Solactive and we’ll see what comes of those in the coming weeks. I suspect that right now both parties are enthusiastically blaming each other; my own conclusion is that:
1. The index definition is flawed in that it is insufficiently precise regarding what they call “Maturity Buckets”, what their weighting should be, and what happens when their relative weights get distorted by new issues or redemptions. The parties are equally to blame for this.
2. If, as I surmise above, the problem developed due to the wave of redemptions in 2021 and 2022, then it is clear that, whatever one part of BMO was doing with its “Monthly Metrics” report, there was no internal monitoring happening by which a problem such as this could be caught early and corrected.

Update, 2023-9-27 : I found an academic reference that looks like it will be useful when I write this up formally, a paper by Adriana Robertson titled Passive in Name Only: Delegated Management and ‘Index’ Investing:

This Article provides the first detailed empirical analysis of the landscape of U.S. stock market indices. First, I hand collect detailed information about the universe of indices used as benchmarks for U.S. mutual funds. I document substantial heterogeneity across indices and find that the overwhelming majority of the indices in my sample are used as a primary benchmark by only a single fund. I then turn to “passive” index funds and find that both these phenomena are even more extreme among the indices that these funds track. Far from being “passive,” my findings indicate that index investing is better understood as a form of delegated management, where the delegee is the index creator rather than the fund manager. Finally, I turn to ETFs and find that a substantial fraction of these funds track indices that they or their affiliates create. Even controlling for other factors, I find that these funds have, on average, higher expense ratios. My findings shed light on an overlooked part of the financial market and have substantial implications for investor protection.

Update, 2023-10-6: Further reference data to be used in a formal write-up can be found in the Statistics Canada page Distributions of household economic accounts for income, consumption, saving and wealth of Canadian households, second quarter 2023, specifically the table used as source data for the article’s tables: Distributions of household economic accounts, wealth, by characteristic, Canada, quarterly (x 1,000,000) with the “Statistics” setting at “Value per Household”.

Update, 2023-11-2: See the October, 2023, PrefLetter for more information.

Update, 2024-3-1: See the post HIMI Releases Research Into ZPR for more information.

Issue Comments

BN.PF.A : No Daycount Factor on Dividends

The story so far:
1. A reset rate of 6.744% was announced, with a dividend amount that did not compute.
2. The company said the dividend amount stated included a daycount factor, but did not get back to me quickly to respond to my further questions
3. And now …

I have received the following communication from Brookfield Investor Relations:

If series 32 shares are not converted, a fixed-rate dividend of $0.4215 (C$25 x 6.744% / 4 quarters) will be made each quarter and it will not be adjusted for a day-count factor. Please disregard our previous email, which may have suggested that it would be. The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited (CDS Ltd.) will publish a bulletin that confirms the aforementioned dividend rate, which you can access through your broker.

We apologize for any confusion. Please let us know if you have any other questions or need further clarification.

So all’s well that ends well.

Issue Comments

BN Silent Regarding BN.PF.A Daycount Dividends

It was pointed out in the comments to the post “BN.PF.A To Reset To 6.744%” that the stated dividend rate, as an annual percentage, did not easily relate to the stated dividend amount. So, as promised, I am looking into it:
JH to BN, 2023-9-5:

Sirs,

According to your press release at LINK “If declared, the fixed quarterly dividends on the Series 32 Shares during the five years commencing October 1, 2023 will be paid at an annual rate of 6.744% ($0.4249644 per share per quarter).”

However, a rate of $0.4249644 per share per quarter is equal to $1.699858 per share per year, which is 6.7994 of the $25.00 par value.

A rate of 6.744% would be 1.686 per year or 0.4215 per quarter on the $25 par value.

Can you please resolve this discrepancy?

Sincerely,

I received the following reply, BN to JH, 2023-9-5:

In accordance with the share documents, the fixed quarterly dividend will be based on the annual dividend rate of 6.744% or C$0.4249644 per share per quarter (C$25 x 6.744% x 92/365 days).

So I sent the following follow-up, JH to BN, 2023-9-5:

Thank you for your response.

This formula, including a daycount factor (92/365) for the dividend, does not appear to have been in prior use.

Your description of the terms of these shares at LINK states: “As and when declared by the board of directors, the fixed quarterly dividend on the Series 32 Preferred Shares during the five-year period from October 1, 2018 until September 30, 2023 will be $0.3163125 per share per quarter, which represents a yield of 5.061% based on the redemption price of $25 per share.” This clearly does not include a daycount factor.

When was the decision made to include a daycount factor and when was this disclosed to beneficial owners?

Additionally, the prospectus for this issue states: “For each five-year period after the Initial Fixed Rate Period (each a “Subsequent Fixed Rate Period”), the holders of Series 32 Shares will be entitled to receive fixed cumulative preferential cash dividends, as and when declared by the Board of Directors, payable quarterly on the last day of March, June, September and December during the Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, in an annual amount per Series 32 Share determined by multiplying the Annual Fixed Dividend Rate (as defined herein) applicable to such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period by $25.00.”

Does this imply that a varying daycount factor will be applied to each dividend on these shares, in order to ensure that the sum of the quarterly payments is equal to the product of the Annual Fixed Dividend Rate and $25.00? In leap years, will the divisor of the daycount factor be changed to 366?

Sincerely,

I have not yet received a reply, but I’m going to try again. I do hope that they abandon this daycount plan. I agree that it’s more accurate, but:

  • It’s not done for bond interest payments, and
  • It means that every single dividend payment has to be calculated or looked up, and
  • It’s bloody annoying
Issue Comments

ENB: S&P says Outlook Negative; DBRS, Review-Developing; Moody’s, Outlook Negative

S&P Global Ratings has announced:

  • On Sept. 5, 2023, Enbridge Inc. announced it entered into definitive agreements with Dominion Energy Inc. to acquire The East Ohio Gas Co. (EOG), Questar Gas Co., and Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc. (PSNC).
  • The aggregate purchase price of approximately US$14 billion consists of US$9.4 billion in cash consideration and US$4.6 billion of assumed debt. The company has also announced a C$4 billion underwritten equity offering to fund part of the cash consideration.
  • The acquisition creates North America’s largest natural gas utility platform and further enhances the company’s business risk profile. Based on our assumed funding plan, we forecast debt-to-EBITDA will be 4.9x in 2024.
  • S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Enbridge to negative from stable and affirmed its ratings on the company, including its ‘BBB+’ issuer credit rating.
  • The negative outlook reflects uncertainty about the nature and timing of the remainder of the financing plan and credit metrics, which leave limited cushion to the company’s downgrade trigger of at or above 5x debt to EBITDA.

S&P Global Ratings today took the rating actions listed above. We believe the addition of the regulated utilities enhances Enbridge’s business risk profile. The acquisition will increase the percentage of EBITDA from Enbridge’s regulated utilities to approximately 25%. Enbridge’s existing utility platform delivers service to about 15 million customers in Ontario and Quebec through 3.9 million residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial meter connections, and distributes more than 5.9 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas, based on 2022 figures. Combining EOG, Questar, and PSNC in this platform will add 3.0 million customers (EOG: 1.2 million; Questar: 1.2 million; PSNC: 600,000), totaling 6.9 million connections post transaction. These customers will be spread across five states and two provinces, further diversifying the company’s platform. We currently assess Enbridge’s business risk as excellent, based on the strong contractual framework that underpins the company’s liquids business and current regulated gas utility business. However, we believe the purchase of the utilities further strengthens its competitive positioning. Consequently, we have applied a positive comparable rating modifier.

Although we believe Enbridge has superior market access, funding plan execution risk remains in the short-to-medium term. The transaction consists of approximately US$14 billion that will be funded through cash consideration. Concurrent with its acquisition announcement, Enbridge also announced a C$4 billion underwritten equity offering. As a result, there is approximately US$6.5 billion to be funded before close in 2024. The company has indicated it will rely on a number of avenues to fund the remainder of the purchase price including noncore asset sales, hybrid capital, dividend reinvestment plan, at-the-market program, and debt. Although Enbridge has superior market access, given a significant portion of the cash consideration still requires funding, we believe that execution risk remains in the short-to-medium term.

Although historically we have considered financial metrics on a funds from operations (FFO)-to-debt basis, we believe that using debt to EBITDA to measure leverage better aligns the company with its peer group, which is primarily located in the U.S. and is evaluated on a debt-to-EBITDA basis. This is particularly the case, given the amount of revenue that Enbridge receives from its U.S. assets. Based on our assumed funding plan, we forecast debt to EBITDA will be 4.9x in 2024. Although the company has reiterated its commitment to debt to EBITDA of 4.5x-5.0x, a metric of 4.9x leaves limited cushion for Enbridge to execute its funding plan without relying on more than our assumed proportion of debt.

The negative outlook reflects the potential for weaker credit measures related to the acquisition of the three regulated gas distribution companies and a level of uncertainty related to the remaining financing plan for the acquisition. This uncertainty is related to potential receipt of proceeds from discrete noncore asset sales, the issuance of hybrid capital, the use of the at-the-market program, the dividend reinvestment plan, and incremental debt that will be used to fund the purchase price. We forecast pro forma debt to EBITDA will be about 4.9x, which provides limited cushion with respect to our target for the rating.

We could lower our rating on Enbridge if the company is unable to successfully raise additional funds through asset sales or other means such that adjusted debt to EBITDA is at or above 5x for a prolonged period.

We could revise the outlook to stable if the company is able to raise a substantial portion of the remainder of the capital to fund the acquisition and reduce debt to EBITDA closer to 4.75x during the next 12-18 months.

Environmental factors are a moderately negative consideration in our credit rating analysis of Enbridge. Climate transition factors into our assessment of all midstream companies. However, we note Enbridge has clearly articulated a strategy to lever its extensive asset portfolio to incorporate projects that address lowering its carbon footprint and longer-term energy transition. An example of this is the development of a solar farm adjacent to the Enbridge Ingleside Energy Centre that will produce the necessary power for the facility. These kinds of projects are available across the asset portfolio and include carbon capture and underground storage, renewable natural gas, offshore wind, and hydrogen. Social factors are also a moderately negative consideration, reflecting the ongoing opposition and ongoing litigation with respect to the company’s Line 5 crude oil pipeline.

DBRS has put the company on Review-Developing:

DBRS Limited (DBRS Morningstar) placed all ratings on Enbridge Inc. (ENB or the Company) and Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. Under Review with Developing Implications. The rating actions follow the announcement on September 5, 2023, that ENB has entered into definitive agreements (the Acquisition) with Dominion Energy, Inc. to acquire (1) East Ohio Gas Company (EOG); (2) Questar Gas Company (Questar Gas) and its related Wexpro companies (Wexpro, and collectively with Questar Gas, Questar); and (3) Public Service Company of North Carolina, Incorporated (PSNC) (collectively, the Local Distribution Companies (LDCs)) for a total purchase price of USD 14.0 billion ($18.9 billion—translated at USD/CAD 1.35), including the assumption of approximately USD 4.6 billion in debt. The rating actions reflect DBRS Morningstar’s view that the Acquisition should have a positive impact on ENB’s business risk profile, while the impact on the financial metrics at this time is uncertain since the financing plan has not been finalized.

DBRS Morningstar intends to resolve the Under Review with Developing Implications status once ENB’s financing plan is finalized and key regulatory approvals have been secured. When finalized, should the financing plan result in minimal to no impact on the Company’s key credit metrics as they stood at the 12 months ended March 31, 2023 (please see DBRS Morningstar’s rating report on the Company dated June 28, 2023, for further details), DBRS Morningstar may consider a positive rating action.

After a review of the business risk profiles of the utilities assets planned to be acquired, DBRS Morningstar believes that the collective business risk profile of these assets is stronger than the weighted average of ENB’s current investment portfolio. Each LDC is state-regulated and operates under a cost-of-service framework with no exposure to natural gas price risk or volume risk. All three LDCs are allowed timely operating costs and capital expenditure recovery, subject to only modest regulatory lags. Combined, the LDCs provide natural gas distribution services to nearly 3.0 million customers with the strongest base of customers at EOG and Questar, which serve approximately 1.2 million customers each. EOG (rate base $6.0 billion in 2022) is a single-state LDC operating an extensive gas distribution system with more than 40 interconnections across nine interstate gas pipelines. EOG is anticipated to have potential for a substantial rate base increase driven by modernization efforts. Questar (rate base $3.9 billion in 2022) largely operates in Utah and has a one-of-a-kind agreement with Wexpro that provides up to 65% of Questar’s annual gas supply on a cost-of-service arrangement. PSNC (rate base $2.6 billion in 2022) is a single-state LDC in North Carolina. Both Questar and PSNC are experiencing growth primarily driven by population expansion within their respective service territories.

DBRS Morningstar believes this acquisition will significantly enhance ENB’s business risk profile for the following key reasons: First, DBRS Morningstar views the planned acquisition of the regulated gas utility businesses as providing a more stable source of cash flow generation with lower risk compared with ENB’s existing business risk profile. The Acquisition is expected to double the contribution of ENB’s regulated gas distribution businesses to approximately 22% of total adjusted EBITDA (DBRS Morningstar estimate for 2024) from 13% currently.

Second, ENB will benefit from greater geographic and regulatory diversification with higher regulatory returns on equity and thicker deemed equity. However, these benefits could be partially or substantially offset by ENB’s final financing plan and the financing of capital expenditure programs for the utility businesses.

Finally, ENB will stand to potentially gain from synergies, as the Acquisition would form the largest natural gas distribution utility in North America, by volume, with a rate base exceeding $27 billion serving approximately 7 million customers in Canada and the U.S.

Notwithstanding the potentially positive impact to ENB’s business risk profile, the Under Review with Developing Implications designation accounts for some uncertainties associated with ENB’s financing plan. To finance the Acquisition, ENB has announced a $4.0 billion equity issuance through a bought deal with the banks, with the balance financed by a variety of sources including senior unsecured notes and hybrid debt securities, continuing the Company’s ongoing capital recycling program, at-the-market equity issuance program, and/or potentially reinstating its dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan. The exact amount of debt to be issued for the Acquisition remains uncertain at this time. Additionally, the Acquisition is contingent on obtaining regulatory approvals and, if obtained, the terms of the approvals. The Acquisition is expected to close in 2024.

Moody’s has gone to Outlook-Negative:

Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) has affirmed the Baa1 senior unsecured ratings of Enbridge Inc. (Enbridge) and its subsidiaries Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (EEP), Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership (EELP) and Spectra Energy Partners, LP (SEP). Moody’s also affirmed the A3 senior unsecured rating on Texas Eastern Transmission L.P. (TETCO) and the Prime -2 short term commercial paper rating on Enbridge (U.S.) Inc. In addition, Moody’s changed the outlooks for Enbridge, EEP, EELP, SEP and TETCO to negative from stable.

Affirmations:

…Issuer: Enbridge Inc.

…. Issuer Rating, Affirmed Baa1

….Backed Senior Unsecured Shelf, Affirmed (P)Baa1

….Subordinate Shelf, Affirmed (P)Baa3

….Preferred Shelf, Affirmed (P)Baa3

….Preferred Stock, Affirmed Baa3

….Preferred Stock, Affirmed (P) Baa3

….Subordinate Notes, Affirmed Baa3

….Senior Unsecured MTN Program, Affirmed (P)Baa1

….Backed Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Baa1

….Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Baa1

..Issuer: Enbridge (U.S.) Inc.

….Backed Senior Unsecured Commercial Paper, Affirmed P-2

..Issuer: Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership

….Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Baa1

..Issuer: Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.

…. Issuer Rating, Affirmed Baa1

….Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Baa1

..Issuer: Spectra Energy Partners, LP

….Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Baa1

..Issuer: Texas Eastern Transmission L.P.

….Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed A3

Outlook Actions:

..Issuer: Enbridge Inc.

….Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

..Issuer: Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership

….Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

..Issuer: Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.

….Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

..Issuer: Spectra Energy Partners, LP

….Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

..Issuer: Texas Eastern Transmission L.P.

….Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

“The negative outlook on Enbridge is prompted by the company’s announcement that it would acquire US gas utilities for approximately USD14 billion, adding pressure to an already weak financial profile that we expect to persist following the transaction close,” said Gavin MacFarlane, Vice President – Senior Credit Officer. ” Although Enbridge’s business risk profile improves modestly with the transaction, it is not enough to offset ongoing pressure on the company’s financial profile.”

Today, Enbridge announced (1) that is has reached an agreement to acquire a portfolio of local gas distribution utilities from Dominion Energy, Inc. (Baa2 stable) for an enterprise value of USD14 billion, which includes an acquisition price of $9.4 billion and $4.6 billion of assumed debt. The utilities include The East Ohio Gas Company (A2 stable); Questar Corp, which includes Questar Gas Company (A3 negative); Wexpro (unrated) and the Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc. (Baa1 stable). The company expects to close the acquisitions separately in 2024 following regulatory approvals.

The negative outlook reflects continued high leverage metrics, with proportionately consolidated debt to EBITDA forecast to remain around 5.5x (5.6x at 31 December 2022) for the foreseeable future, and low levels of financial flexibility highlighted by weak distribution coverage metrics (using depreciation) of 0.9x. The company’s low business risk profile improves with the acquisition of these utilities but not enough to change our overall business risk assessment of the company. With the close of these acquisitions, the gas utilities business will grow to about 22% of EBITDA from 12%. While diversification is improving with the acquisition, structural subordination is also increasing, although we do not expect to add a notch to Enbridge’s rating for this.

Enbridge has announced a CAD4 billion equity issuance in conjunction with the acquisition announcement. We expect the balance of the transactions to be financed with a mix of debt, hybrids, asset sales, and equity issuances which may include a combination of an at the market program or the activation of a dividend reinvestment program. The company has received debt financing commitments totaling $9.4 billion to improve liquidity in advance of closing the transactions.

The affirmation of Enbridge’s Baa1 rating reflects the company’s large size, scale and diverse, low risk asset base, all of which will be enhanced as a result of these acquisitions. Offsetting these strengths is ongoing high leverage and a sizable multiyear capital program. The company’s portfolio of assets will continue to generate stable cash flow based on a combination of rate regulation, a favorable contractual profile and a strong competitive position.

The ratings of subsidiaries SEP and EEP reflect the strength of the cross-guarantee that exists between each of them and Enbridge that causes the senior unsecured notes at these entities to have similar credit quality. EELP benefits from a guarantee from Enbridge that drives its credit profile. The credit profile of Enbridge (U.S.) Inc. reflects the liquidity support provided by Enbridge, which guarantees the commercial paper program. The ratings on Tetco have been affirmed based on the underlying strength of its business with the negative outlook reflecting our view that its rating is limited to one notch above that of Enbridge.

Rating Outlook

The negative outlook reflects the incremental pressure on the financial profile of the company as a result of the acquisition, given its already weak financial profile for the current Baa1 rating.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Factors that could lead to an Upgrade

  • • An upgrade is unlikely given the negative outlook
  • • The outlook could return to stable if we expect proportionately consolidated debt to EBITDA to be sustained comfortably below 5.5x and distribution coverage, using depreciation, to be above 1x
  • • A further improvement in the company’s business risk profile

Factors that could lead to a Downgrade

  • • Proportionately consolidated debt to EBITDA at or above 5.5x or distribution coverage, using depreciation, at or below 1x
  • • Failure to successfully execute or material delays with regard to the capital raising and asset sales programs
  • • A deterioration in the company’s business risk profile or an increase in structural subordination

The principal methodology used in rating Enbridge Inc., Enbridge (U.S.) Inc., Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P., Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership and Spectra Energy Partners, LP was Midstream Energy published in February 2022 and available at https://ratings.moodys.com/rmc-documents/379531. The principal methodology used in rating Texas Eastern Transmission L.P. was Natural Gas Pipelines published in July 2018 and available at https://ratings.moodys.com/rmc-documents/64961. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on https://ratings.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies

Affected issues are (… deep breath …):ENB.PF.A, ENB.PF.C, ENB.PF.E, ENB.PF.G, ENB.PF.K, ENB.PR.A, ENB.PR.B, ENB.PR.D, ENB.PR.F, ENB.PR.H, ENB.PR.J, ENB.PR.N, ENB.PR.P, ENB.PR.T, ENB.PR.Y.

Issue Comments

BN.PF.A To Reset To 6.744%

Brookfield Corporation has announced:

that it has determined the fixed dividend rate on its Cumulative Class A Preference Shares, Series 32 (“Series 32 Shares”) (TSX: BN.PF.A) for the five years commencing October 1, 2023 and ending September 30, 2028.

If declared, the fixed quarterly dividends on the Series 32 Shares during the five years commencing October 1, 2023 will be paid at an annual rate of 6.744% ($0.4249644 per share per quarter – inoperable. See BN.PF.A : No Daycount Factor on Dividends).

Holders of Series 32 Shares have the right, at their option, exercisable not later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on September 15, 2023, to convert all or part of their Series 32 Shares, on a one-for-one basis, into Cumulative Class A Preference Shares, Series 33 (the “Series 33 Shares”), effective September 30, 2023. The quarterly floating rate dividends on the Series 33 Shares will be paid at an annual rate, calculated for each quarter, of 2.90% over the annual yield on three-month Government of Canada treasury bills. The actual quarterly dividend rate in respect of the October 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 dividend period for the Series 33 Shares will be 2.03081% (8.057% on an annualized basis) and the dividend, if declared, for such dividend period will be $0.5077025 per share, payable on December 31, 2023.

Holders of Series 32 Shares are not required to elect to convert all or any part of their Series 32 Shares into Series 33 Shares.

As provided in the share conditions of the Series 32 Shares, (i) if Brookfield determines that there would be fewer than 1,000,000 Series 32 Shares outstanding after September 30, 2023, all remaining Series 32 Shares will be automatically converted into Series 33 Shares on a one-for-one basis effective September 30, 2023; and (ii) if Brookfield determines that there would be fewer than 1,000,000 Series 33 Shares outstanding after September 30, 2023, no Series 32 Shares will be permitted to be converted into Series 33 Shares. There are currently 11,750,299 Series 32 Shares outstanding.

The Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) has conditionally approved the listing of the Series 33 Shares effective upon conversion. Listing of the Series 33 Shares is subject to Brookfield fulfilling all the listing requirements of the TSX.

BN.PF.A was issued as BAM.PF.A, a FixedReset 4.50%+290 that commenced trading 2012-3-13 after being announced 2012-3-5. The issue reset at 5.061% in 2018; I recommended against conversion; and there was no conversion. The ticker changed to BN.PF.A in late 2022. It is tracked by HIMIPref™ and assigned to the FixedResets subindex.

Thanks to Assiduous Reader Joel A for bringing this to my attention!

Update, 2023-09-06: See also BN Silent Regarding BN.PF.A Daycount Dividends
Update, 2023-09-08: See also BN.PF.A : No Daycount Factor on Dividends