PrefBlog

Jobs, jobs, jobs!

April’s job-creation score was better, March was worse, and the U.S. jobless rate crept closer to the Federal Reserve’s moving target for full employment.

The 223,000 increase in payrolls last month followed a revised 85,000 gain in March that was the smallest since June 2012, figures from the Labor Department showed Friday in Washington. The jobless rate fell to 5.4 percent, the lowest since May 2008, from 5.5 percent.
…
Wage growth remained limited, with average hourly earnings rising 0.1 percent in April after a revised 0.2 percent March gain that was weaker than initially reported. The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey projected a 0.2 percent increase for last month.

Compared with a year earlier, hourly pay was up 2.2 percent last month, holding within the narrow range tracked over the past four years.
…
The report also included positive news on the size of the labor force. The participation rate, which indicates the share of working-age people who are employed or looking for work, increased to 62.8 percent from 62.7 percent in March, which matched the lowest since 1978. The gain was paced by 45-to-64 year-old Americans.
…
The Fed now defines full employment as between 5 percent and 5.2 percent, according to projections released after their March 17-18 meeting. The range was lowered from 5.2 percent to 5.5 percent after the jobless rate reached the top of the scale in February.

In Canada, not so much:

The Target effect is denting Canada’s jobs numbers.

Employers shed a total of 19,700 jobs last month, according to Statistics Canada, the most since August, as retailers eliminated thousands of sales, cashiers and clerks positions.

The numbers show the impact of a raft of store closings amid upheaval in the sector, including Target Canada, Best Buy, Mexx, Smart Set, Indigo Books and Sony. The sector may be in flux, but it remains the largest source of employment in the country.
…
The retail sector posted a loss of 20,500 workers, Statscan said Friday, leaving employment levels flat from a year earlier. Monthly jobs numbers can be volatile, but separate payrolls data show the retail sector has contracted for four months in a row.

In January, Target said it was pulling out of Canada, an abrupt move that spelled job losses for 17,600 of its workers over the ensuing months and put pressure on hundreds of firms that served the chain, forcing some of them to lay off staff, too.

Across Canada, the jobless rate stayed at 6.8 per cent as fewer people looked for work.

Monthly numbers can swing up and down, but smoothed-out averages show employment has grown by just 2,600 jobs on average per month in the past half-year. Year-over-year employment growth has been stuck below 1 per cent for the past 13 months.

Other sectors shed workers as well last month, in construction and information services. Natural resources were little changed in the month, but are down 6.6 per cent from a year earlier, reflecting the oil price slide.

On the other hand, it’s my understanding that in Toronto, house flippers have basically been priced out of the market by eager-to-buy veterans of too many bidding wars. In the States, not so much:

Real estate buyers seeking money to renovate and flip U.S. houses are getting help from some of the world’s biggest investment firms.

Colony Capital Inc., Blackstone Group LP and Cerberus Capital Management are among the companies that have started making bridge loans to investors who buy homes to sell them quickly for a profit. Borrowing costs — traditionally the highest in residential lending — are tumbling as the firms compete for customers.

The foray represents a deepening bet on the housing market by Wall Street-backed companies, many of which have built rental-home empires during the past three years and started specialty-lending businesses to finance smaller investors. Big firms with deep pockets and access to cheap capital may have an edge over local private lenders that have dominated flipper financing.
…
Home flippers are benefiting from rising prices, limited new construction and a shortage of inventory on the market. While quick resales have decreased from the start of the housing market’s rebound, when investors snapped up discounted distressed homes, profits are getting bigger.

The average gross profit for completed flips in the first quarter was $72,450, up from $61,684 a year earlier and the highest in records dating to 2011, according to a report Thursday from RealtyTrac, a real estate data firm. Markets with the highest average gross return on investment included Baltimore, central Florida and Detroit.

‘Who will watch the watchers?’ query the wise men in Congress. Watcher watchers!

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby is putting the finishing touches on a bill that could give Congress more power over the New York Fed and create a commission with authority to propose sweeping reforms of the entire Fed system.

Other senators want to curb the Fed’s ability to bail out banks during a financial meltdown and increase transparency of its regulation.

“Shelby wants to do something with the Fed,” said Ed Mills, a financial-policy analyst at FBR & Co. in Arlington, Virginia, and a former adviser to Democrats in the House and Senate. “It seems as if they’re going to have something in here that is additional oversight of the Fed or rebalancing some of the power internally at the Fed, whether staff resources or more transparency.”

There’s really only one structural problem with the Fed: it has responsibility for both bank supervision and monetary policy. While there are good arguments to be made in favour of combining the mandates, as has been discussed previously on PrefBlog (see, for example, September 10, 2008 and Willem Buiter’s Prescription), I continue to think that puts just too much power in the hands of one institution.

As far as ‘Fed bailouts of Wall Street Banks’ are concerned – well, for the most part that’s a canard. The explicit bail-outs were done by the Treasury with the authority of congress. The Fed simply lent to solvent banks against adequate collateral … which is what Central Banks are supposed to do during a liquidity crisis. They can, however, be criticized for not ensuring that these loans were not made at penalty rates:

The Fed didn’t tell anyone which banks were in trouble so deep they required a combined $1.2 trillion on Dec. 5, 2008, their single neediest day. Bankers didn’t mention that they took tens of billions of dollars in emergency loans at the same time they were assuring investors their firms were healthy. And no one calculated until now that banks reaped an estimated $13 billion of income by taking advantage of the Fed’s below-market rates, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its January issue.

Brookfield Investments Corporation, proud issuer of BRN.PR.A (which is not tracked by HIMIPref™) has been confirmed at Pfd-2(low) by DBRS:

DBRS Limited (DBRS) has today confirmed the rating of Pfd-2 (low) with a Stable trend for the Senior Preferred Shares of Brookfield Investments Corporation (Brookfield Investments or the Company). The rating continues to be based on the strength of Brookfield Investments’ owner (Brookfield Asset Management Inc. or BAM; rated A (low), Stable trend by DBRS), as well as the Company’s relatively stable portfolio of real estate and asset management investments, with strong asset and dividend coverage. The rating remains limited by Brookfield Investments’ exposure to the volatility of overall capital markets, concentration of investments in the real estate sector, lack of investment restrictions and the relative illiquidity of unlisted investments.

It was another strong-mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts gaining 19bp, FixedResets up 33bp and DeemedRetractibles off 2bp. The strength in FixedResets came at the end of the day:

TXPL

Click for Big

A Performance Highlights table of unsurprising size was unsurprisingly dominated by winning FixedResets, but there were a few losers in the mix. Volume was quite high.

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 24.48 to be $0.96 rich, while TRP.PR.G, resetting 2020-11-30 at +296, is $1.12 cheap at its bid price of 25.04.

Click for Big

Another excellent fit, but the numbers are perplexing. Implied Volatility for MFC continues to be a conundrum. It is still too high if we consider that NVCC rules will never apply to these issues; it is still too low if we consider them to be NVCC non-compliant issues (and therefore with Deemed Maturities in the call schedule).

Most expensive is MFC.PR.K, resetting at +222 on 2018-9-19, bid at 23.52 to be $0.28 rich, while MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, is bid at 25.61 to be $0.43 cheap.

Click for Big

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PR.R, resetting at +230bp on 2016-6-30, bid at 20.52 to be $0.60 cheap. BAM.PR.X, resetting at +180bp 2017-6-30 is bid at 18.51 and appears to be $0.57 rich.

Click for Big

FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 16.63, looks $0.76 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp and resetting 2019-3-1, is bid at 22.14 and is $0.52 rich.

Click for Big

Investment-grade pairs now predict an average over the next five years of about 0.35%, but TRP.PR.A / TRP.PR.F is an outlier at -0.78% and BNS.PR.Y / BNS.PR.D is at +0.84%. On the junk side, the FFH.PR.E / FFH.PR.F pair is at -0.68% while DC.PR.B / DC.PR.D is now at 0.95%.

Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?

I hear there’s a bit of backlash against the lawyers, accountants and stockbrokers crossing the Alberta-Saskatchewan border in search of a better life:

Click for Big

The Swiss central bank accumulated a lot of foreign currency as it attempted to defend the indefensible CHF / EUR peg. Guess what they’ve done with all that cash!

The Swiss National Bank had a rough quarter in Q1 as the decision to abandon the increasingly unsustainable EURCHF floor (an event which marked an implicit admission that central banks are not all-powerful after all) blew a $32 billion hole in the central bank’s euro reserves. That, however, wasn’t the most remarkable takeaway from the SNB’s quarterly report.

More interesting than the massive loss was the line item in the SNB’s balance sheet which shows that 18% of the bank’s assets are held in foreign stocks.

By “blew a hole”, he must be referring to the P&L – the balance sheet bloated, of course.

Click for Big

Liquidity problems continue to attract attention:

As bonds tumbled across Europe, the bid-ask spread, a gauge of the market’s depth derived from the difference in prices or yields between buyers and sellers, widened. It reached 0.27 basis point for German 10-year bunds on Thursday, up from as low as 0.1 in March and an average of 0.2 this year, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

That means sellers may be getting squeezed by a shortage of buyers. Adding to the risk of holding bonds, implied option volatility on German 10-year bund futures contracts surged in the past week to the highest since August 2012.
…
Bonds have sold off in a global rout that wiped more than $430 billion from the market in the past week. A capitulation on long positions, or bets that prices will rise, was triggered by a shift in sentiment as improving economic data and rising oil prices prompted investors to revolt against record-low yields.

Yet the magnitude of the decline wasn’t justified by those economic numbers, none of which points to a big jump in inflation or interest rates, according to Rabobank’s McGuire.

The yield on Germany’s 10-year bund, the benchmark euro-zone security, has surged 43 basis points since the start of last week to a high for 2015. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

The jump suggests that increased regulation may be hampering dealers’ ability to make markets and that bond-purchase programs such as the European Central Bank’s quantitative-easing plan have cut the amount of securities in circulation.

The Canadian preferred share market was on fire today, albeit very unevenly. Can I call this “on mixed fire”? PerpetualDiscounts gained 43bp, FixedResets were up 62bp, while DeemedRetractibles were off 6bp. The volume highlights table is, predictably, both lengthy and dominated by FixedResets. Volume was very high.

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 24.24 to be $0.95 rich, while TRP.PR.G, resetting 2020-11-30 at +296, is $0.86 cheap at its bid price of 25.11.

Another excellent fit, but the numbers are perplexing. Implied Volatility for MFC continues to be a conundrum. It is still too high if we consider that NVCC rules will never apply to these issues; it is still too low if we consider them to be NVCC non-compliant issues (and therefore with Deemed Maturities in the call schedule).

Most expensive is MFC.PR.N, resetting at +230 on 2020-3-19, bid at 23.97 to be $0.51 rich, while MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, is bid at 25.52 to be $0.47 cheap.

Click for Big

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PR.R, resetting at +230bp on 2016-6-30, bid at 20.34 to be $0.56 cheap. BAM.PF.E, resetting at +255bp 2020-3-31 is bid at 23.16 and appears to be $0.72 rich.

Click for Big

FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 16.70, looks $0.73 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp and resetting 2019-3-1, is bid at 22.10 and is $0.50 rich.

Click for Big

Investment-grade pairs now predict an average over the next five years of about 0.40%, but TRP.PR.A / TRP.PR.F is an outlier at -0.77% and BNS.PR.Y / BNS.PR.D is at +0.70%. On the junk side, the BRF.PR.A / BRF.PR.B pair is at -0.72% while FFH.PR.C / FFH.PR.D is at +1.20%.

Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?

Here’s bit of an update on the persecution of Navinder Singh Sarao:

Sarao’s lawyer, James Lewis, disclosed the existence of a worldwide freezing order on his client’s assets that precludes him from raising the 5 million-pound ($7.6 million) bail.

Sarao has been “languishing on remand unable to meet” the bail conditions, and it’s “impossible to supply the security,” because of the freezing order, Lewis said. He also unsuccessfully applied to have a blanket ban on Internet use amended to only restrict him from trading, arguing a complete prohibition was “manifestly disproportionate.”

Sarao has been in custody since April 21, when he was arrested at the house he shares with his parents near Heathrow airport. He is being held at Wandsworth prison in London while fighting extradition to the U.S.

Roscoe rejected a request to release Sarao solely on a 50,000 pound-security put up by his parents, saying the bail amount had to satisfy her that he isn’t a flight risk.

Yep, that’s the way to do it! Set bail to a ludicrously high amount, then freeze the guy’s assets so he can’t possibly put up the money! As noted on May 1, the most recent penalty for spoofing was a sixty day trading suspension. But Sarao’s offence was blatant? Yeah, right, that’s why it took five years to find it, and why it got no mention whatsoever in the SEC report.

Selective enforcement is an affront to justice, and the anti-spoofing laws are ridiculous and unenforceable in the first place.

Fitch Ratings thinks the Canadian economy is vulnerable to condos:

There are more than 80,000 condo units under construction across Ontario, most of them in the Greater Toronto Area. That’s 50 per cent higher than just four years ago, although the number of new housing starts has fallen from its peak in 2012, Fitch said. In the face of so much supply, condo prices have remained flat across the province.

Therein lies the problem, according to Fitch.

“As a large number of units come on line, prices may soften, which could reverberate throughout the Canadian economy,” Fitch director Stefan Hilts wrote. “Lower prices would reduce the incentives to build further units, which could hit employment in the construction sector that has been buoyed by continuing price growth. This in turn could lead to more significant downside exposure.”

Yellen is trying to talk down the market (without saying “irrational exuberance”):

Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, surveying the financial landscape for signs of bubbles after more than six years of near-zero rates, warned that both stocks and bonds are richly valued.

“I would highlight that equity-market valuations at this point generally are quite high,” Yellen said in Washington on Wednesday in response to a question at a forum on finance. “Now, they’re not so high when you compare the returns on equities to the returns on safe assets like bonds, which are also very low, but there are potential dangers there.”

Yellen said bond yields “could see a sharp jump” when the Fed raises its benchmark interest rate. Most Fed officials predict that will happen this year for the first time since 2006.

She highlighted the term premium:

“Long-term interest rates are at very low levels, and that would appear to embody low term premiums, which can move, and can move very rapidly,” Yellen said after a speech in Washington. “We need to be attentive, and are to the possibility that when the Fed decides it’s time to begin raising rates, these term premiums could move up, and we could see a sharp jump in long-term rates.”

And the “global bond rout” has spread to Japan:

Japan’s government bonds joined a worldwide rout in sovereign debt as investors in Tokyo returned from a three-day national holiday.
…
The yield on the 10-year bond jumped seven basis points to 0.43 percent as of 8:52 a.m. in Tokyo from May 1, according to Japan Bond Trading Co., the nation’s largest inter-dealer debt broker. The price of the 0.4 percent debt due March 2025 fell 0.665 yen to 99.716. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

Meanwhile in the real economy (remember that?) productivity is falling:

Productivity over the past six months fell by the most in more than two decades, leading to increases in U.S. labor costs that threaten corporate profits.

The measure of employee output per hour decreased at a 1.9 percent annualized rate after a revised 2.1 percent drop in the prior three months, a Labor Department report showed Wednesday in Washington. The decline on average over the past two quarters was the biggest since the first six months of 1993. Expenses per worker increased more than projected at the start of the year.

A lack of business investment in new technology may mean productivity will continue to languish and limit the economic expansion’s potential. Rising labor costs without offsetting increases in efficiency would also hurt business earnings, and in turn restrain the hiring that would propel consumer spending.

But it’s an ill wind that doesn’t blow the banks any good:

The chart watchers in the stock market would like to draw your attention to notable recent moves by some large U.S. banks. JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s shares, for example, on Monday reached the highest level in 15 years. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. touched the highest price since 2008 last month and the SPDR S&P Bank ETF reached a 13-month high this week.

One obvious reason for the recent strength is a strong earnings season. The 24 companies in the KBW Bank Index posted profit growth of 8.8 percent and beat analysts’ estimates by almost 10 percent. Another reason, however, is a bit more slippery: the recent spike higher in interest rates on longer-term Treasuries. The subsequent steepening of the yield curve, it stands to reason, should be good for banks because they borrow at short-term rates and lend at long-term rates.

The sell-side old boys’ club in the States has approved an increase in tick size for smaller company shares, as a way of chipping away against hedge-fund friendly maker-taker fees:

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved a two-year program designed to test ways to boost investors’ interest in smaller stocks.

The trading experiment, championed by small-business advocates and opposed by big investors such as Fidelity Investments and D.E. Shaw & Co., will widen the minimum price at which stocks for small companies are quoted on exchanges, the SEC said Wednesday in a statement. The program would reward brokers for making markets in less-liquid stocks by widening the amount they earn when buying and selling shares.

Exchanges must start the pilot program by May 6, 2016, the SEC said. It will apply to shares of 1,400 companies with market values under $3 billion and average daily trading volume of less than 1 million shares, the SEC said.
…
Asset managers such as Fidelity opposed the program because they’re concerned it will raise transaction costs and probably won’t foster more initial public offerings.

Naturally, it did not occur to anybody at the SEC or the Dodd-Frank crowd in congress to do something about the ridiculous cost of going public and being a public company.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts up 22bp, FixedResets off 14bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 4bp. The Performance Highlights table is dominated by losing FixedResets. Volume was average.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.02%, equivalent to 6.53% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield about 4.05% so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is not now about 250bp, a very sharp narrowing from the 295bp reported April 22.

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 24.19 to be $1.17 rich, while TRP.PR.B, resetting 2015-6-30 at +128, is $0.91 cheap at its bid price of 25.01.

Click for Big

Another excellent fit, but the numbers are perplexing. Implied Volatility for MFC continues to be a conundrum. It is still too high if we consider that NVCC rules will never apply to these issues; it is still too low if we consider them to be NVCC non-compliant issues (and therefore with Deemed Maturities in the call schedule).

Most expensive is MFC.PR.K, resetting at +222 on 2018-9-19, bid at 23.33 to be $0.30 rich, while MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, is bid at 25.35 to be $0.55 cheap.

Click for Big

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PR.R, resetting at +230bp on 2016-6-30, bid at 20.18 to be $0.53 cheap. BAM.PF.E, resetting at +255bp 2020-3-31 is bid at 22.72 and appears to be $0.50 rich.

Click for Big

FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 16.60, looks $0.83 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp and resetting 2019-3-1, is bid at 21.90 and is $0.41 rich.

Click for Big

Investment-grade pairs now predict an average over the next five years of about 0.30%, but TRP.PR.A / TRP.PR.F is an outlier at -0.73% and BNS.PR.Y / BNS.PR.D is at +0.96%. On the junk side, the DC.PR.B / DC.PR.D pair is at -0.78% while FFH.PR.C / FFH.PR.D is at +1.22%.

Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?

After years of pretending that their resource-funded low taxes meant that they were some kind of conservatives, Albertans have finally admitted they’re actually a pack of socialists:

Albertans have chosen a new political path with the stunning election of a majority New Democratic government, ending a Progressive Conservative dynasty in power for more than four decades.

The NDP, leading in the polls for much of the campaign, becomes only the third party to govern the province since 1935. Heading a new government, Leader Rachel Notley will now have a mandate to take the province in a new direction but will also inherit tough economic challenges.

Solidarity, comrades!

Australia cut policy rates and market rates rose:

Australia cut interest rates to a fresh record low and said there are signs of improving household spending, sending the currency and bond yields higher as markets bet policy makers won’t ease further.

The central bank lowered the key rate to 2 percent from 2.25 percent Tuesday, as predicted by traders and economists. Governor Glenn Stevens said in an accompanying statement “the inflation outlook provided the opportunity for monetary policy to be eased further, so as to reinforce recent encouraging trends in household demand.”

While weaker business investment and subdued spending by the government is weighing on the economy, encouraging the RBA to cut, there are signs that low borrowing costs are starting to spur stronger demand from households. Stevens cited a better jobs market and gave no indication the central bank was considering a further easing.

But bonds fell everywhere:

Treasuries fell with European bonds as oil’s rally above $60 a barrel added to signs of incipient inflation, while concern rose that Greece won’t be able to resolve its debt crisis. U.S. stocks tumbled the most in more than a month amid a retreat in global equities.

Yields on 10-year Treasury notes rose four basis points to 2.19 percent by 5 p.m. in New York, extending an eight-week high as U.S. crude jumped 2.5 percent to $60.40 a barrel. German bonds resumed losses, while Spanish debt tumbled with Greek stocks. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index lost 1.2 percent, the steepest drop since March 25. European equities slid to the lowest level since March 10. Copper entered a bull market.

The exodus from sovereign-debt markets is accelerating as investors question the sustainability of rallies that pushed yields to record lows. Data Tuesday showed U.S. services growth accelerated more than forecast last month as the Federal Reserve considers raising interest rates. Crude traded in New York topped $60 for the first time this year on speculation the biggest supply glut in 85 years will ease.
…
Ten-year Treasury yields have increased 28 basis points, or 0.28 percentage point, since April 24 and earlier on Tuesday touched the highest level since March 6. German 10-year yields rose six basis points to 0.52 percent, for a seventh straight gain to the highest level since January. Spain’s 10-year rate jumped the most since June 2013.

There are rumblings of an increase in inflation targets:

A quarter of a century since New Zealand opened the era of inflation targeting, policy makers from the U.S., euro area, U.K. and Japan are all undershooting their consumer-price goals. Of the Group of Seven, only Canada is currently meeting its mandate.

Rather than lowering their sights to make things easier, the misses are fanning calls for targets to be increased from the 2 percent most aim for to perhaps as high as 4 percent.

While a similar idea was pitched five years ago by International Monetary Fund economists led by Olivier Blanchard, and endorsed by Nobel laureate Paul Krugman, this time around it may be the central-banking community itself proposing a rethink.

Former Federal Reserve Chair Ben S. Bernanke last month suggested he would be open to an increase in the U.S. Federal Reserve’s 2 percent goal, saying there is nothing “magical” about that number.

Fed Bank of Boston President Eric Rosengren said the same month it could be the case “inflation targets have been set too low.” His colleague from San Francisco, John Williams, told the New York Times that if the future is one of weaker growth because of demographics and productivity then it’s worth asking “is the 2 percent inflation goal sufficiently high in that kind of world?”

But if they can’t hit 2 percent, why lift the targets?

Doing so may ignite current inflation expectations, lowering so-called real interest rates and giving economic growth an extra spur, according to Jeremy Lawson, chief economist at Standard Life Investments Ltd.

And today’s drone news is about privacy:

Conflict is on the rise. A New Jersey man last year shot down a drone flying over his neighborhood. Last June, a woman in Connecticut was arrested after she was accused of assaulting a young man flying a helicopter drone over a public beach.

In the past two years, at least seven states have outlawed the use of drones to violate privacy, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. California is considering a bill that would expand trespassing laws to include piloting a drone within 350 feet above private property without permission.
…
States already protect citizens against Peeping Toms regardless of the technology involved, said Brendan Schulman, an attorney who specializes in drones at Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel in New York.

“Many of these state law proposals are an overreaction, because existing state privacy laws already cover the types of misconduct that people are most concerned about,” he said. “It shouldn’t matter if you use a tripod or a zoom lens or a hidden camera placed in a tree. If you’re invading someone’s privacy, it’s the misconduct that should be illegal, and not the technology.”

PrefBlog’s “Things That Make You Go ‘Hmmm'” department presents, for your delectation and amusement, charts of the TXPL FixedReset index and of ZPR, the ETF based on that index, for today:

ZPR

Click for Big

TXPL

Click for Big

So it looks like there was mild weakness in TXPL commencing at about 1pm, which had no effect on ZPR until about 3pm, when ZPR started collapsing, which in turn led to a rapid collapse just before the bell in TXPL. ZPR had volume for the day of 895,012 which, by standards of the past month, is above average but not spectacular. Total returns for the day for the two measures were roughly equal. It would be most interesting to learn just what is going on; if the liquidity pundits are correct – and I think they are – we may see more of this type of loose-linkage-fast-collapse behaviour in the future, should a general rise in bond yields become disorderly.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts off 29bp, FixedResets down 47bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 6bp. ENB FixedResets dominate the bad part of the Performance Highlights table. Volume was well above average.

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 24.20 to be $1.15 rich, while TRP.PR.G, resetting 2020-11-30 at +296, is $0.91 cheap at its bid price of 25.01.

Click for Big

Another excellent fit, but the numbers are perplexing. Implied Volatility for MFC continues to be a conundrum. It is still too high if we consider that NVCC rules will never apply to these issues; it is still too low if we consider them to be NVCC non-compliant issues (and therefore with Deemed Maturities in the call schedule).

Most expensive is MFC.PR.L, resetting at +216 on 2019-6-19, bid at 23.30 to be $0.51 rich, while MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, is bid at 25.34 to be $0.58 cheap.

Click for Big

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PF.R, resetting at +230bp on 2016-6-30, bid at 20.05 to be $0.71 cheap. BAM.PF.E, resetting at +255bp 2020-3-31 is bid at 23.12 and appears to be $0.82 rich.

Click for Big

FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 16.60, looks $0.78 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp and resetting 2019-3-1, is bid at 22.02 and is $0.52 rich.

Click for Big

Investment-grade pairs now predict an average over the next five years of about 0.30%, but TRP.PR.A / TRP.PR.F is an outlier at -0.69%. The DC.PR.B / DC.PR.D pair retains its customary outlier status, with a breakeven rate of -0.78%, but has now managed to edge its way into the graph area while the new data point for BRF.PR.A / BRF.PR.B is at -1.22% and BRF.PR.B lost its virginity with a whopping 600 shares traded.

Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?

Canadian banks do not own hedge funds, so the TMX announced reductions in maker-taker fees:

TMX Group Ltd., the owner of the Toronto Stock Exchange and other Canadian markets, said Monday that it will cut rebates it pays traders who provide liquidity by an average of 31 percent and trading fees by 26 percent on average.

The rebate-and-fee system — called maker-taker and also deployed by American exchanges — is blamed by critics for skewing incentives for brokers and encouraging needless trading meant to simply collect the rebates. While the New York Stock Exchange’s owner last year talked about changing the system in the U.S., TMX’s statement Monday included concrete plans that are poised to be implemented.

“The maker-taker model has been controversial for a long time,” Kevan Cowan, president of TSX Markets and group head of equities, said in a phone interview from Toronto. “It’s closely linked to issues around electronic trading. We felt, based on primarily customer feedback but also what’s going on in the regulatory and competitive landscape, that now was a good time for us to take a leadership position.”

It will be noted that the banks clear-cut the competitive landscape by buying the Toronto Exchange. This move was permitted by the regulators on the grounds that the banks would pay the regulators extra money.

Treasuries took another hit today:

The 30-year bond yield rose five basis points, or 0.05 percentage point, to 2.88 percent at 5 p.m. New York time. The price of the 2.5 percent security maturing in February 2045 fell 30/32, or $9.38 per $1,000 face amount, to 92 1/2, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader prices. The yield reached the highest level since Dec. 24.

Benchmark 10-year yields rose 21 basis points last week, nearly matching the 22 basis point move in German bunds of comparable maturity, the most since January 2013.
…
The gap between yields on Treasuries maturing in five- and 30-years, known as the yield curve, widened to 1.37 percentage points, the most since December.

The 5-30 spread is – or at least should be! – important for FixedReset pricing. Steepening should(!) imply poor performance by FixedResets.

I found this piece on youthful environment interesting:

Male children who are raised in below-median income families in Baltimore earn 1.4 percent less in adult family income for each year that they’re exposed to the neighborhood. That means a man who spent his entire childhood — 20 years — in Baltimore would earn about 28 percent less relative to the national average as an adult.

That gives Baltimore the worst ranking among the 100 largest counties in the U.S. While a penalty exists for girls, too, it’s less substantial, amounting to 0.3 percent in lost earnings per childhood year.

There are pockets across the U.S. “which seem to produce especially poor outcomes for boys,” Harvard economists Raj Chetty and Nathaniel Hendren wrote in a new study. “Areas with high degrees of segregation and sprawl generate particularly negative outcomes for boys relative to girls.”

The abstract of the paper, The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility: Childhood Exposure Effects and County-Level Estimates, by Raj Chetty and Nathaniel Hendren, reads:

We characterize the effects of neighborhoods on children’s earnings and other outcomes in adulthood by studying more than five million families who move across counties in the U.S. Our analysis consists of two parts. In the first part, we present quasi-experimental evidence that neighborhoods affect intergenerational mobility through childhood exposure effects. In particular, the outcomes of children whose families move to a better neighborhood – as measured by the outcomes of children already living there – improve linearly in proportion to the time they spend growing up in that area. We distinguish the causal effects of neighborhoods from confounding factors by comparing the outcomes of siblings within families, studying moves triggered by displacement shocks, and exploiting sharp variation in predicted place effects across birth cohorts, genders, and quantiles. We also document analogous childhood exposure effects for college attendance, teenage birth rates, and marriage rates. In the second part of the paper, we identify the causal effect of growing up in every county in the U.S. by estimating a fixed effects model identified from families who move across counties with children of different ages. We use these estimates to decompose observed intergenerational mobility into a causal and sorting component in each county. For children growing up in families at the 25th percentile of the income distribution, each year of childhood exposure to a one standard deviation (SD) better county increases income in adulthood by 0.5%. Hence, growing up in a one SD better county from birth increases a child’s income by approximately 10%. Low-income children are most likely to succeed in counties that have less concentrated poverty, less income inequality, better schools, a larger share of two-parent families, and lower crime rates. Boys’ outcomes vary more across areas than girls, and boys have especially poor outcomes in highly-segregated areas. In urban areas, better areas have higher house prices, but our analysis uncovers significant variation in neighborhood quality even conditional on prices.

Fortis still hasn’t announced a reset rate for FTS.PR.H yet, despite the fact that it must have been calculated:

“Fixed Rate Calculation Date” means, for any Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the 30th day prior to the first day of such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period.
…
“Subsequent Fixed Rate Period” means, for the initial Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the period commencing on June 1, 2015 to, but excluding, June 1, 2020 and, for each succeeding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the period commencing on the first day of June immediately following the end of the immediately preceding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period to, but excluding, June 1 in the fifth year thereafter.
…
The Annual Fixed Dividend Rate applicable to a Subsequent Fixed Rate Period will be determined by the Corporation on the Fixed Rate Calculation Date. Such determination will, in the absence of manifest error, be final and binding upon the Corporation and upon all holders of the Series H First Preference Shares. The Corporation will, on the Fixed Rate Calculation Date, give written notice of the Annual Fixed Dividend Rate for the ensuing Subsequent Fixed Rate Period to the registered holders of the then outstanding Series H First Preference Shares.

I assume this figure will be released tomorrow morning:

Fortis Inc. (“Fortis” or the “Corporation”) (TSX:FTS) will release its first quarter 2015 results on Tuesday, May 5, 2015. A teleconference and webcast will be held the same day at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern). Barry Perry, President and Chief Executive Officer, Fortis, and Karl Smith, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Fortis, will discuss the Corporation’s first quarter 2015 results.

Analysts, members of the media and other interested parties in North America are invited to participate by calling 1.877.223.4471. International participants may participate by calling 647.788.4922. Please dial in 10 minutes prior to the start of the call. No pass code is required.

It was a positive day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts up 17bp, FixedResets winning 17bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 1bp. The Performance Highlights table calmed down a bit, but is still dominated by winning FixedResets. Volume was below average.

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 24.32 to be $1.21 rich, while TRP.PR.G, resetting 2020-11-30 at +296, is $0.96 cheap at its bid price of 25.00.

Click for Big

Another excellent fit, but the numbers are perplexing. Implied Volatility for MFC continues to be a conundrum. It is still too high if we consider that NVCC rules will never apply to these issues; it is still too low if we consider them to be NVCC non-compliant issues (and therefore with Deemed Maturities in the call schedule).

Most expensive is MFC.PR.L, resetting at +216 on 2019-6-19, bid at 23.31 to be $0.40 rich, while MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, is bid at 25.48 to be $0.50 cheap.

Click for Big

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PF.R, resetting at +230bp on 2016-6-30, bid at 20.43 to be $0.60 cheap. BAM.PF.E, resetting at +255bp 2020-3-31 is bid at 23.16 and appears to be $0.61 rich.

Click for Big

FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 16.75, looks $0.65 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp and resetting 2019-3-1, is bid at 22.03 and is $0.52 rich.

Click for Big

Investment-grade pairs now predict an average over the next five years of about 0.25%, but TRP.PR.A / TRP.PR.F is an outlier at -0.62%. The DC.PR.B / DC.PR.D pair retains its customary outlier status, with a breakeven rate of -1.39%, while the new data point for BRF.PR.A / BRF.PR.B is at -1.22% … but there has still been no trading yet for BRF.PR.B.

Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?