DBRS Places BRF.PR.A On Review-Developing

September 13th, 2011

Brookfield has announced:

a plan to combine Brookfield Renewable Power Fund and the power generating assets owned Brookfield Renewable Power Inc., to create Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners L.P. (“BREP”), a global, publicly-traded partnership focused on renewable power generation.

The transaction will require approval by 662/3% of Fund unitholders and a majority of unitholders other than Brookfield and related persons present at the meeting in person or by proxy and Ontario court approvals. In addition, Brookfield will seek approval from 662/3% of the holders of Preferred Shares and Brookfield Renewable Power’s unsecured bondholders, which are conditions to closing. Meeting materials containing details of the proposed transaction are expected to be mailed to security holders of the Fund, Brookfield Renewable Power Equity and Brookfield Renewable Power as soon as practicable. It is anticipated that meetings of security holders to seek the approvals referred to above will be held in October and November of 2011.

In response, DBRS has announced:

has today placed the Senior Unsecured Debentures and Notes rating of Brookfield Renewable Power Inc. (BRPI) Under Review with Developing Implications. DBRS has also placed the Issuer Rating and Income Fund rating of Brookfield Renewable Power Fund (the Fund) and the Preferred Shares, Series 1 (the Preferred Shares) rating of the Fund affiliate Brookfield Renewable Power Preferred Equity Inc. (Equity Inc.) Under Review with Developing Implications.

Equity Inc.’s Preferred Shares will become the obligation of a BREP subsidiary, guaranteed on a subordinate basis by BREP, mimicking the current structure under which the Preferred Shares are guaranteed on a subordinate basis by the Fund. Similar to the Fund, BREP would feature a contracted generation portfolio, with a weighted-average term of approximately 24 years. For the Preferred Shareholders, DBRS views the Transaction as offering a number of positive aspects that reduce business risk:

(1) BREP would be a much larger and more diverse renewable generator than the Fund, with the addition of contracted assets in the United States and Brazil. BREP’s approximate $13 billion in total assets would be more than double the Fund’s current size (C$5.6 billion as of June 30, 2011). BREP’s generating capacity (approximately 4,400 MW) is also substantially larger than that of the current Fund (approximately 1,700 MW). As mentioned above, BREP is expected to generate $1.1 billion annual EBITDA and $550 million cash flow from operations, based on long-term average hydrology and production levels. The added geographic diversity would result in lower exposure to weak hydrology in any one area.

(2) Average contract prices for the Ontario generation operations, which represent approximately 50% of the Fund’s production, will increase from C$68/MWh to C$88/MWh.

(3) Counterparty exposure to BRPI will be reduced. Currently, BRPI is the counterparty on more than 70% of the Fund’s revenues (DBRS estimate); with the addition of the new assets, this concentration is expected to decline to the range of 50% to 60%.

(4) BREP is expected to have improved access to equity capital given its larger market capitalization and broader investor base.

However, the Transaction is expected to increase the financial risk from the perspective of the Preferred Shareholders as post-Transaction, the Preferred Shares would rank behind the C$1.1 billion of MTNs as opposed to behind the minimal levels of Fund-level debt that existed historically. Additionally, many of the U.S. and Brazilian generating assets have existing non-recourse project debt (as do many of the Fund’s current assets). DBRS views this negative effect as being balanced by the above-mentioned improvement in business risk resulting from the much larger, diverse contracted asset base and, therefore, as neutral from the perspective of an Equity Inc. Preferred Shareholder.

New Issue: CU FixedReset 4.00%+240

September 13th, 2011

Canadian Utilities first announced:

it has entered into an agreement with a syndicate of underwriters co-led by RBC Capital Markets and BMO Capital Markets, and including TD Securities Inc. and Scotia Capital Inc. The underwriters have agreed to buy 8 million 4.00% Cumulative Redeemable Second Preferred Shares Series Y at a price of $25.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $200 million. The proceeds will be used for capital expenditures, to repay indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

Canadian Utilities Limited has granted the underwriters an option to purchase at the offering price an additional 2 million Series Y Preferred Shares exercisable in whole or in part at any time up to 9:00 AM on the date that is 2 days prior to closing. Should the option be fully exercised, the total gross proceeds of the Series Y Preferred Share offering will be $250 million.

The Series Y Preferred Shares will be issued to the public at a price of $25.00 per share and holders will be entitled to receive fixed cumulative preferential cash dividends, payable quarterly for an initial period of five and a half years, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, at an annual rate of $1.00 per share, to yield 4.00% annually. Thereafter, the dividend rate will reset every five years to the then current 5-Year Government of Canada Bond yield plus 2.40%. On June 1, 2017, and on June 1 of every fifth year thereafter, the Corporation may redeem the Series Y Preferred Shares in whole or in part at par.

Holders may elect to convert any or all of their Series Y Preferred Shares into an equal number of Cumulative Redeemable Second Preferred Shares Series Z on June 1, 2017, and on June 1 of every fifth year thereafter.

Holders of the Series Z Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive quarterly floating rate cumulative preferential cash dividends, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, equal to the then current 3-month Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 2.40%. On June 1 of every fifth year after conversion, the Corporation may redeem the Series Z Preferred Shares in whole or in part at par; on any other date, the Corporation may redeem the Series Z Preferred Shares in whole or in part by the payment of $25.50 for each share to be redeemed.

The offering is being made only in the provinces of Canada by means of a prospectus supplement and the closing date of the issue is expected to be on or about September 21, 2011.

They later announced:

that as a result of strong investor demand for its previously announced offering of Cumulative Redeemable Second Preferred Shares Series Y, the size of the offering has been increased to 11 million shares. The aggregate gross proceeds will now be $275 million. The proceeds will be used for capital expenditures, to repay indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

Canadian Utilities Limited has granted the underwriters an option to purchase at the offering price an additional 2 million Series Y Preferred Shares exercisable in whole or in part at any time up to 9:00 AM on the date that is 2 days prior to closing. Should the option be fully exercised, the total gross proceeds of the Series Y Preferred Share offering will be $325 million.

Update, 2011-9-15: DBRS assigns Pfd-2(high).

September 12, 2011

September 12th, 2011

The weird index movement is growing:

More large US fund companies are taking a do-it-yourself approach to indexing.

In the latest evidence of that trend, both iShares and John Hancock last month filed applications with the Securities and Exchange Commission seeking permission to launch exchange traded funds based on indices constructed by their respective parent companies, BlackRock and Manulife.

Today, commoditisation of broad-based index products and the concentration of assets into a handful of funds create pressure on sponsors to either cut fees or find another way to differentiate their products and attract assets, analysts say. Most ETFs do not break out licensing fees, but the S&P 500 SPDR pays 3 basis points, or a third of its 9-basis point expense ratio, to the index provider.

The other advantage, of course, it that it makes product comparison more difficult.

Those nasty speculators are betting against the political line again:

The cost of insuring European sovereign and bank debt rose to records on speculation Germany is preparing for a default by Greece while French lenders may be downgraded because of their holdings of the country’s bonds.

The Markit iTraxx SovX Western Europe Index of credit- default swaps on 15 governments soared 15 basis points to 351 at 3:30 p.m. in London. The Markit iTraxx Financial Index linked to senior debt of 25 banks and insurers increased 17 basis points to 317 and the subordinated index jumped 25 to 560, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.

But those pesky speculators keep betting against Greece:

Greece’s chance of default in the next five years has soared to 98 percent as Prime Minister George Papandreou fails to reassure international investors that his country can survive the euro-region crisis.

It now costs a record $5.8 million upfront and $100,000 annually to insure $10 million of Greek debt for five years using credit-default swaps, up from $5.5 million in advance Sept. 9, according to CMA.

Comrade Peace-Prize’s stimulus plan involves closing the carried interest loophole:

President Barack Obama’s $447 billion legislative proposal to boost hiring includes measures that would more than offset the cost of cutting payroll taxes and spending on infrastructure and state aid, his budget chief said.

The plan includes proposals to change tax rules on carried interest to treat it as ordinary income and removing tax breaks for the oil and gas industry, Jack Lew, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, said at a briefing.

Glad to hear it! Carried Interest interest is the process by which hedge fund managers pay themselves in units of the fund and then declare the this income as capital gains. Whatever one might think of Capital Gains Tax, it’s clear that its purpose is to encourage people to put skin in the game – but the managers aren’t investing anything other than their time. It’s one of the more ridiculous provisions of the US tax code.

SocGen is doing some trimming:

Societe Generale (GLE) SA, France’s third-largest bank by assets, plans to free up 4 billion euros ($5.4 billion) in capital through disposals by 2013 to reassure investors about its finances.

The lender’s exposure to Greek bonds is about 900 million euros and it has “no significant” holdings of Irish or Portuguese debt, the Paris-based bank said today in a statement. Societe Generale aims to cut the cost base of its investment bank by 5 percent and have a core Tier 1 capital ratio “well above” 9 percent by 2013 with no capital increase. The company is also shedding jobs at retail networks in Russia, Romania, the Czech Republic and Egypt, it said.

So is BofA:

Bank of America Corp. (BAC), the biggest U.S. lender by assets, will eliminate 30,000 jobs in the next few years as part of Chief Executive Officer Brian T. Moynihan’s plan to bolster profit and the company’s stock.

The reductions, equal to about 10 percent of the staff, are part of an overhaul that aims to remove about $5 billion in annual costs by the end of 2013.

People affected by the cuts may include those working in data centers and deposit systems, said Moynihan, 51. The company had 63 data centers inherited through its acquisitions, and “we’ll take that down,” he said. Also targeted are three deposit systems, one scheduled to be “merged out” later this year and another in 2012, plus “tens of millions of square feet” in idle real estate.

Those are part of Project New BAC’s first phase, which focuses on consumer banking, credit cards, home loans and technology, Moynihan said. The second phase will begin in October and continue until April, covering institutional services such as global markets, commercial banking and corporate banking, according to the investor presentation.

How about them three year note yields, eh?:

The U.S. government sold $32 billion of three-year securities at a record low yield in the first of three note and bond offerings this week totaling $66 billion.

Yields on 10-year notes gained three basis points, or 0.03 percentage point, to 1.95 percent at 4:36 p.m. in New York, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader prices. The 2.125 percent securities maturing in August 2021 fell 9/32, or $2.81 per $1,000 face amount, to 101 17/32. The yields earlier touched 1.8770 percent, the lowest level on record in Federal Reserve data beginning in 1953.

The current three-year note yields increased five basis points to 0.34 percent. The yields on 30-year bonds were little changed at 3.25 percent.

The three-year note auction yield of 0.334 percent was lower than the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, for three-month loans in dollars, at 0.343 percent.

Bond auctions have different headlines in Italy:

Italy is auctioning as much as 7 billion euros ($10 billion) of bonds one day after borrowing costs surged at a bill auction, as Greece’s slide toward default roils global markets.

The treasury is selling 4 billion euros of a new benchmark five-year bond today, after 10-year yields climbed to a five- week high of 5.571 percent. Investors charged Italy 4.153 percent yesterday in a one-year bill offering, up from 2.959 percent a month ago.

Rajaratnam seems intent on digging himself in deeper:

Galleon Group LLC co-founder Raj Rajaratnam may face a stiffer sentence for directing the biggest-ever hedge fund insider trading scheme after telling a court official he still wasn’t “clear” that what he did was wrong.

Rajaratnam, 54, convicted in May of trading on illegal stock tips, later told a court official that he wasn’t “clear” on “the line between permissible ‘detective work’ and impermissible insider trading,” prosecutors said.

After his conviction, Rajaratnam was interviewed by a court probation officer who is writing a memorandum proposing a sentence to the judge. Such interviews are standard in criminal cases. In a legal brief on Sept. 9, prosecutors excerpted some of his comments to the probation officer while telling U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell in New York that they show Rajaratnam “remains defiant.”

“In my own mind, the line between permissible ‘detective work’ and impermissible insider trading was not always clear, especially with regard to companies broadly covered by the news media as to which there was a wealth of publicly available information, including frequent leaks, rumors and speculation about corporate transactions and other important developments,” Rajaratnam told the probation officer, according to prosecutors.

It gets worse later in the story, but this is an important issue – because nobody knows where the line is crossed. That’s determined afterwards, depending on whether the regulators want to hang you or not. The NYT claims that regulators are attempting to broaden the definition of insider trading:

Investors use multiple tidbits of nonpublic information from various sources to build a “mosaic” to try to get an edge on other investors.

“The S.E.C.’s recent enforcement docket reflects a belief that certain buy-side investors’ investment activities were rife with insider trading violations, and that there are more to be found,” the law firm Fried Frank wrote in a note to its clients last week titled “Avoiding Insider Trading Risks in Fundamental Investment Research.” Indeed, the mosaic theory itself is one of the central defenses in the insider trading investigation of Raj Rajaratnam, founder of the Galleon Group.

Whatever suits are brought, many of them may be compared to a 1973 insider trading case against Raymond Dirks, a research analyst. According to Fried Frank’s memo, the court in that case determined that insider trading could be established only if prosecutors proved three separate points: that the tipper has breached his fiduciary duty to the shareholders by disclosing the information to the tippee; that the tippee “knows or should know that there has been a breach”; and that the tipper somehow benefited as a result of providing the information.

But there may be an even more important and larger lesson in the Dirks case. All this “research” is actually quite important, even if it gets close to the line. Otherwise, investors would be left making decisions simply based on what they are fed by companies.

The Supreme Court, which ended up ruling against the S.E.C. in the Dirks case, wrote that if he had been found guilty, it “could have an inhibiting influence on the role of market analysts, which the S.E.C. itself recognizes is necessary to the preservation of a healthy market.”

Richard Fisher of FRB-Dallas is talking a tough line:

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Richard Fisher said he probably won’t support further monetary easing by the Fed, arguing that steps that would boost the recovery are the responsibility of fiscal authorities.

“If I believe further accommodation or some jujitsu with the yield curve will do the trick and ignite sustainable aggregate demand, I will support it,” Fisher said today in a speech in Dallas. “But the bar for such action remains very high for me until the fiscal authorities do their job, just as we have done ours. And if they do, further monetary accommodation may not even be necessary.”

DBRS confirmed TRI at Pfd-2(low).

Equitable Group, proud issuer of ETC.PR.A, has announced:

Equitable Group Inc. (“Equitable” or the “Company”) today announced that John Ayanoglou, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer will be leaving EGI effective immediately to pursue other interests.

The Company is confident in the depth of its finance team while it works to fill the position.

Geez, it’s open season on CFOs nowadays, eh? Assiduous Readers will remember that on August 23 I reported on their previous press release:

Equitable Group Inc. (“Equitable” or the “Company”) today announced that it has become aware of a suspected fraud relating to four loans having a total outstanding balance of approximately $14.0 million.

There is no indication that these press releases are related in any way, but the timing is very interesting indeed.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts winning 25bp, FixedResets down 3bp and DeemedRetractibles losing 7bp. Volatility was average, as was volume.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.7815 % 2,137.7
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.7815 % 3,215.0
Floater 3.03 % 3.40 % 62,225 18.66 3 -0.7815 % 2,308.1
OpRet 4.81 % 2.89 % 62,827 1.65 8 -0.0337 % 2,451.8
SplitShare 5.37 % 0.56 % 55,004 0.46 4 -0.0726 % 2,496.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0337 % 2,241.9
Perpetual-Premium 5.63 % 4.60 % 125,140 1.09 16 -0.1339 % 2,113.6
Perpetual-Discount 5.27 % 5.35 % 113,528 14.83 14 0.2539 % 2,256.0
FixedReset 5.14 % 3.06 % 206,951 2.64 59 -0.0295 % 2,332.2
Deemed-Retractible 5.04 % 4.60 % 243,038 7.82 46 -0.0687 % 2,200.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.B Floater -1.64 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-12
Maturity Price : 15.55
Evaluated at bid price : 15.55
Bid-YTW : 3.41 %
PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Discount 1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-12
Maturity Price : 24.20
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 5.26 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 1.38 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-12
Maturity Price : 23.51
Evaluated at bid price : 25.75
Bid-YTW : 2.77 %
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.60 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-12
Maturity Price : 23.68
Evaluated at bid price : 24.15
Bid-YTW : 4.77 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
BAM.PR.M Perpetual-Discount 92,201 RBC crossed 77,300 at 22.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-12
Maturity Price : 22.18
Evaluated at bid price : 22.55
Bid-YTW : 5.35 %
SLF.PR.C Deemed-Retractible 89,826 RBC crossed 81,500 at 21.80.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.75
Bid-YTW : 6.17 %
TD.PR.A FixedReset 57,151 Desjardins crossed 50,000 at 26.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.14
Bid-YTW : 3.26 %
SLF.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 50,571 RBC crossed 40,000 at 23.15.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.15
Bid-YTW : 5.71 %
BAM.PR.K Floater 43,300 TD crossed 11,900 at 15.75; Desjardins crossed 29,800 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-12
Maturity Price : 15.60
Evaluated at bid price : 15.60
Bid-YTW : 3.40 %
SLF.PR.F FixedReset 37,511 Desjardins crossed 20,000 at 26.95.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.80
Bid-YTW : 3.21 %
There were 32 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
ALB.PR.B SplitShare Quote: 22.20 – 22.89
Spot Rate : 0.6900
Average : 0.4446

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-02-28
Maturity Price : 21.80
Evaluated at bid price : 22.20
Bid-YTW : 0.56 %

ENB.PR.A Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.36 – 25.65
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.2003

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-10-12
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.36
Bid-YTW : -9.68 %

RY.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 26.81 – 27.10
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.2016

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.81
Bid-YTW : 3.31 %

BMO.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 26.76 – 27.00
Spot Rate : 0.2400
Average : 0.1524

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.76
Bid-YTW : 3.33 %

GWO.PR.J FixedReset Quote: 26.62 – 26.99
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2834

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.62
Bid-YTW : 2.96 %

NA.PR.M Deemed-Retractible Quote: 27.00 – 27.24
Spot Rate : 0.2400
Average : 0.1703

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-05-15
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.00
Bid-YTW : 3.66 %

September PrefLetter Released!

September 12th, 2011

The September, 2011, edition of PrefLetter has been released and is now available for purchase as the “Previous edition”. Those who subscribe for a full year receive the “Previous edition” as a bonus.

The September edition contains an appendix updating the situation with Yellow Media Inc.

PrefLetter may now be purchased by all Canadian residents.

Until further notice, the “Previous Edition” will refer to the September, 2011, issue, while the “Next Edition” will be the October, 2011, issue, scheduled to be prepared as of the close October 14 and eMailed to subscribers prior to market-opening on October 17.

PrefLetter is intended for long term investors seeking issues to buy-and-hold. At least one recommendation from each of the major preferred share sectors is included and discussed.

Note: My verbosity has grown by such leaps and bounds that it is no longer possible to deliver PrefLetter as an eMail attachment – it’s just too big for my software! Instead, I have sent passwords – click on the link in your eMail and your copy will download.

Note: The PrefLetter website has a Subscriber Download Feature. If you have not received your copy, try it!

Note: PrefLetter eMails sometimes runs afoul of spam filters. If you have not received your copy within fifteen minutes of a release notice such as this one, please double check your (company’s) spam filtering policy and your spam repository – there are some hints in the post Sympatico Spam Filters out of Control. If it’s not there, contact me and I’ll get you your copy … somehow!

Note: There have been scattered complaints regarding inability to open PrefLetter in Acrobat Reader, despite my practice of including myself on the subscription list and immediately checking the copy received. I have had the occasional difficulty reading US Government documents, which I was able to resolve by downloading and installing the latest version of Adobe Reader. Also, note that so far, all complaints have been from users of Yahoo Mail. Try saving it to disk first, before attempting to open it.

Note: There have been other scattered complaints that double-clicking on the links in the “PrefLetter Download” email results in a message that the password has already been used. I have been able to reproduce this problem in my own eMail software … the problem is double-clicking. What happens is the first click opens the link and the second click finds that the password has already been used and refuses to work properly. So the moral of the story is: Don’t be a dick! Single Click!

BNA Semi-Annual Report

September 11th, 2011

BAM Split Corp., issuer of BNA.PR.B, BNA.PR.C, BNA.PR.D and BNA.PR.E, has released its Semi-Annual Report to March 31, 2011.

Figures of interest are:

MER: (excluding dividends on preferred shares, issue costs and Class A Preferred Share redemption premium) 0.0%. You don’t see that number very often! A more precise calculation from the Income Statement shows that the expenses totalled $190,000 for the half, or about 2bp p.a. on assets.

The expenses are wel itemized, however, and are a delight for voyeurs. I found the Listing Fees of $97,000 and Rating Fees of $7,000 to be most interesting.

Average Net Assets: This must be calculated if we’re to find the second decimal point on the MER. There was share issuance approximately half-way through the period, so say [1,547,354 (beginning of period) + 1,670,440 (end of period)] / 2 = 1,609-million, about

Underlying Portfolio Yield: Given the fund’s portfolio composition and investment policy, deviations from the raw yield on BAM.A will not be material. This is currently 1.875%

Income Coverage: Dividends & Interest of $14.117-million less expenses (before amortization of issue costs) of $0.190-million is $13.927-million, to cover preferred dividends of $11.298-million is 123%.

LBS.PR.A Releases 11H1 Report

September 11th, 2011

Life & Banc Split Corp. has released its Semi-Annual Report to June 30, 2011.

Figures of interest are:

MER: 0.99% of the whole unit value.

Average Net Assets: We need this to calculate portfolio yield, but it’s very rough due to the issuance of $63-million worth of new units on February 22 via a warrant offering. Try [190.8-million (NAV, beginning of period) + 250.3-million (NAV, end of period)] / 2 = about 221-million

Underlying Portfolio Yield: Total income of 4,367,129, times two (semi-annual) divided by average net assets of 221-million is 3.95%.

Income Coverage: Net Investment Income was 3,076,865. Preferred Share Distributions were 3,582,177, but don’t count the 0.13125 dividends on the 3,341,143 preferreds issued in March totalling 438,525. So net preferred dividends were 3,143,652, so Income Coverage is 98%.

SBC.PR.A: 11H1 Semi-Annual Report

September 11th, 2011

Brompton Split Bank Corp. has released its Semi-Annual Report to June 30, 2011.

Figures of interest are:

MER: 1.00% of the whole unit value.

Average Net Assets: We need this to calculate portfolio yield. [128.1-million (NAV, beginning of period) + 132.3-million (NAV, end of period)] / 2 = about 130-million.

Underlying Portfolio Yield: Total income of 2,580,360, times two (semi-annual) divided by average net assets of 130-million is 3.97%

Income Coverage: Net Investment Income of 1,910,961 divided by Preferred Share Distributions of 1,574,707 is 121%.

MAPF Performance, August 2011

September 9th, 2011

The fund performed well on the month, influenced by the extraordinarily volatile YLO issues. While these fell overall on the month, the fund topped up its holdings following the August 4 release of the 11Q2 financial results, which took prices down to very low levels.

The fund’s Net Asset Value per Unit as of the close August 31 was $11.1492.

Returns to August 31, 2011
Period MAPF Index CPD
according to
Claymore
One Month +0.73% -0.70% -0.64%
Three Months -0.38% +0.14% +0.10%
One Year +14.73% +10.86% +7.66%
Two Years (annualized) +12.08% +8.53% N/A
Three Years (annualized) +25.82% +8.51% +6.20%
Four Years (annualized) +18.41% +4.83%  
Five Years (annualized) +15.23% +3.93%  
Six Years (annualized) +13.63% +3.88%  
Seven Years (annualized) +12.58% +4.04%  
Eight Years (annualized) +13.25% +4.27%  
Nine Years (annualized) +13.81% +4.50%  
Ten Years (annualized) +13.13% +4.38%  
The Index is the BMO-CM “50”
MAPF returns assume reinvestment of distributions, and are shown after expenses but before fees.
CPD Returns are for the NAV and are after all fees and expenses.
* CPD does not directly report its two-year returns.
Figures for Omega Preferred Equity (which are after all fees and expenses) for 1-, 3- and 12-months are -0.74%, -0.03% and +8.13%, respectively, according to Morningstar after all fees & expenses. Three year performance is +6.85%.
Figures for Jov Leon Frazer Preferred Equity Fund Class I Units (which are after all fees and expenses) for 1-, 3- and 12-months are -0.39%, +0.36% and +4.03% respectively, according to Morningstar
Figures for Manulife Preferred Income Fund (formerly AIC Preferred Income Fund) (which are after all fees and expenses) for 1-, 3- and 12-months are -0.41%, +0.26% & +6.16%, respectively
Figures for Horizons AlphaPro Preferred Share ETF are not yet available (inception date 2010-11-23)

MAPF returns assume reinvestment of dividends, and are shown after expenses but before fees. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund or any other fund. For more information, see the fund’s main page. The fund is available either directly from Hymas Investment Management or through a brokerage account at Odlum Brown Limited.

Sometimes everything works … sometimes the trading works, but sectoral shifts overwhelm the increment … sometimes nothing works. The fund seeks to earn incremental return by selling liquidity (that is, taking the other side of trades that other market participants are strongly motivated to execute), which can also be referred to as ‘trading noise’. There were a lot of strongly motivated market participants during the Panic of 2007, generating a lot of noise! Unfortunately, the conditions of the Panic may never be repeated in my lifetime … but the fund will simply attempt to make trades when swaps seem profitable, without worrying about the level of monthly turnover.

There’s plenty of room for new money left in the fund. I have shown in recent issues of PrefLetter that market pricing for FixedResets is demonstrably stupid and I have lots of confidence – backed up by my bond portfolio management experience in the markets for Canadas and Treasuries, and equity trading on the NYSE & TSX – that there is enough demand for liquidity in any market to make the effort of providing it worthwhile (although the definition of “worthwhile” in terms of basis points of outperformance changes considerably from market to market!) I will continue to exert utmost efforts to outperform but it should be borne in mind that there will almost inevitably be periods of underperformance in the future.

The yields available on high quality preferred shares remain elevated, which is reflected in the current estimate of sustainable income.

Calculation of MAPF Sustainable Income Per Unit
Month NAVPU Portfolio
Average
YTW
Leverage
Divisor
Securities
Average
YTW
Capital
Gains
Multiplier
Sustainable
Income
per
current
Unit
June, 2007 9.3114 5.16% 1.03 5.01% 1.2857 0.3628
September 9.1489 5.35% 0.98 5.46% 1.2857 0.3885
December, 2007 9.0070 5.53% 0.942 5.87% 1.2857 0.4112
March, 2008 8.8512 6.17% 1.047 5.89% 1.2857 0.4672
June 8.3419 6.034% 0.952 6.338% 1.2857 $0.4112
September 8.1886 7.108% 0.969 7.335% 1.2857 $0.4672
December, 2008 8.0464 9.24% 1.008 9.166% 1.2857 $0.5737
March 2009 $8.8317 8.60% 0.995 8.802% 1.2857 $0.6046
June 10.9846 7.05% 0.999 7.057% 1.2857 $0.6029
September 12.3462 6.03% 0.998 6.042% 1.2857 $0.5802
December 2009 10.5662 5.74% 0.981 5.851% 1.0819 $0.5714
March 2010 10.2497 6.03% 0.992 6.079% 1.0819 $0.5759
June 10.5770 5.96% 0.996 5.984% 1.0819 $0.5850
September 11.3901 5.43% 0.980 5.540% 1.0819 $0.5832
December 2010 10.7659 5.37% 0.993 5.408% 1.0000 $0.5822
March, 2011 11.0560 6.00% 0.994 5.964% 1.0000 $0.6594
June 11.1194 5.87% 1.018 5.976% 1.0000 $0.6645
August, 2011 11.1492 6.31% 1.009 6.367% 1.0000 $0.7099
NAVPU is shown after quarterly distributions of dividend income and annual distribution of capital gains.
Portfolio YTW includes cash (or margin borrowing), with an assumed interest rate of 0.00%
The Leverage Divisor indicates the level of cash in the account: if the portfolio is 1% in cash, the Leverage Divisor will be 0.99
Securities YTW divides “Portfolio YTW” by the “Leverage Divisor” to show the average YTW on the securities held; this assumes that the cash is invested in (or raised from) all securities held, in proportion to their holdings.
The Capital Gains Multiplier adjusts for the effects of Capital Gains Dividends. On 2009-12-31, there was a capital gains distribution of $1.989262 which is assumed for this purpose to have been reinvested at the final price of $10.5662. Thus, a holder of one unit pre-distribution would have held 1.1883 units post-distribution; the CG Multiplier reflects this to make the time-series comparable. Note that Dividend Distributions are not assumed to be reinvested.
Sustainable Income is the resultant estimate of the fund’s dividend income per current unit, before fees and expenses. Note that a “current unit” includes reinvestment of prior capital gains; a unitholder would have had the calculated sustainable income with only, say, 0.9 units in the past which, with reinvestment of capital gains, would become 1.0 current units.
DeemedRetractibles are comprised of all Straight Perpetuals (both PerpetualDiscount and PerpetualPremium) issued by BMO, BNS, CM, ELF, GWO, HSB, IAG, MFC, NA, RY, SLF and TD, which are not exchangable into common at the option of the company (definition refined in May). These issues are analyzed as if their prospectuses included a requirement to redeem at par on or prior to 2022-1-31, in addition to the call schedule explicitly defined. See OSFI Does Not Grandfather Extant Tier 1 Capital, CM.PR.D, CM.PR.E, CM.PR.G: Seeking NVCC Status and the January, February, March and June, 2011, editions of PrefLetter for the rationale behind this analysis.

Significant positions were held in DeemedRetractible and FixedReset issues on August 31; all of the former and most of the latter currently have their yields calculated with the presumption that they will be called by the issuers at par prior to 2022-1-31. This presents another complication in the calculation of sustainable yield. The fund also holds a position in a SplitShare (BNA.PR.C) and an OperatingRetractible Scrap (YLO.PR.B) which also have their yields calculated with the expectation of a maturity at par, a somewhat dubious assumption in the latter case.

However, if the entire portfolio except for the PerpetualDiscounts were to be sold and reinvested in these issues, the yield of the portfolio would be the 5.80% shown in the MAPF Portfolio Composition: August 2011 analysis (which is greater than the 5.34% index yield on August 31). Given such reinvestment, the sustainable yield would be $11.1492 * 0.0580 = $0.6467, an increase from the $11.0683 * 0.0567 = $0.6276 reported in July.

Different assumptions lead to different results from the calculation, but the overall positive trend is apparent. I’m very pleased with the results! It will be noted that if there was no trading in the portfolio, one would expect the sustainable yield to be constant (before fees and expenses). The success of the fund’s trading is showing up in

  • the very good performance against the index
  • the long term increases in sustainable income per unit

As has been noted, the fund has maintained a credit quality equal to or better than the index; outperformance is due to constant exploitation of trading anomalies.

Again, there are no predictions for the future! The fund will continue to trade between issues in an attempt to exploit market gaps in liquidity, in an effort to outperform the index and keep the sustainable income per unit – however calculated! – growing.

MAPF Portfolio Composition, August 2011

September 9th, 2011

Turnover picked up in August, to a little over 11%.

Trades were, as ever, triggered by a desire to exploit transient mispricing in the preferred share market (which may be thought of as “selling liquidity”), rather than any particular view being taken on market direction, sectoral performance or credit anticipation.

MAPF Sectoral Analysis 2011-8-31
HIMI Indices Sector Weighting YTW ModDur
Ratchet 0% N/A N/A
FixFloat 0% N/A N/A
Floater 0% N/A N/A
OpRet 0% N/A N/A
SplitShare 9.8% (+0.6) 6.67% 6.15
Interest Rearing 0% N/A N/A
PerpetualPremium 0.0% (0) N/A N/A
PerpetualDiscount 9.5% (-1.4) 5.80% 14.13
Fixed-Reset 8.8% (-1.2%) 3.10% 2.47
Deemed-Retractible 59.4% (-1.4) 5.87% 8.04
Scraps (Various) 11.6% (+1.9) 10.59% 8.58
Cash +0.9% (+1.4) 0.00% 0.00
Total 100% 6.31% 7.93
Totals and changes will not add precisely due to rounding. Bracketted figures represent change from July month-end. Cash is included in totals with duration and yield both equal to zero.
DeemedRetractibles are comprised of all Straight Perpetuals (both PerpetualDiscount and PerpetualPremium) issued by BMO, BNS, CM, ELF, GWO, HSB, IAG, MFC, NA, RY, SLF and TD, which are not exchangable into common at the option of the company. These issues are analyzed as if their prospectuses included a requirement to redeem at par on or prior to 2022-1-31, in addition to the call schedule explicitly defined. See OSFI Does Not Grandfather Extant Tier 1 Capital, CM.PR.D, CM.PR.E, CM.PR.G: Seeking NVCC Status and the January, February, March and June, 2011, editions of PrefLetter for the rationale behind this analysis.

The “total” reflects the un-leveraged total portfolio (i.e., cash is included in the portfolio calculations and is deemed to have a duration and yield of 0.00.). MAPF will often have relatively large cash balances, both credit and debit, to facilitate trading. Figures presented in the table have been rounded to the indicated precision.

Credit distribution is:

MAPF Credit Analysis 2011-8-31
DBRS Rating Weighting
Pfd-1 0 (0)
Pfd-1(low) 47.7% (-2.3)
Pfd-2(high) 20.4% (-2.3)
Pfd-2 0 (0)
Pfd-2(low) 19.8% (+1.7)
Pfd-3(high) 2.7% (-3.5)
Pfd-3 8.4% (+4.9)
Cash +0.9% (+1.4)
Totals will not add precisely due to rounding. Bracketted figures represent change from July month-end.
A position held in ELF preferreds has been assigned to Pfd-2(low)

The increase in Pfd-3 holdings at the expense of Pfd-3(high) is due to the downgrade of YLO.

Liquidity Distribution is:

MAPF Liquidity Analysis 2011-8-31
Average Daily Trading Weighting
<$50,000 5.9% (+0.4)
$50,000 – $100,000 21.2% (+0.1)
$100,000 – $200,000 18.5% (-3.9)
$200,000 – $300,000 25.2% (+6.7)
>$300,000 28.2% (-4.8)
Cash +0.9% (+1.4)
Totals will not add precisely due to rounding. Bracketted figures represent change from July month-end.

MAPF is, of course, Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund, a “unit trust” managed by Hymas Investment Management Inc. Further information and links to performance, audited financials and subscription information are available the fund’s web page. The fund may be purchased either directly from Hymas Investment Management or through a brokerage account at Odlum Brown Limited. A “unit trust” is like a regular mutual fund, but is sold by offering memorandum rather than prospectus. This is cheaper, but means subscription is restricted to “accredited investors” (as defined by the Ontario Securities Commission) or those who subscribe for $150,000+. Fund past performances are not a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in MAPF or any other fund.

A similar portfolio composition analysis has been performed on the Claymore Preferred Share ETF (symbol CPD) as of August 31, 2010, and published in the September, 2010, PrefLetter. While direct comparisons are difficult due to the introduction of the DeemedRetractible class of preferred share (see above) it is fair to say:

  • MAPF credit quality is better
  • MAPF liquidity is a higher
  • MAPF Yield is higher
  • Weightings in
    • MAPF is much more exposed to DeemedRetractibles
    • MAPF is much less exposed to Operating Retractibles
    • MAPF is slightly more exposed to SplitShares
    • MAPF is less exposed to FixFloat / Floater / Ratchet
    • MAPF weighting in FixedResets is much lower

September 9, 2011

September 9th, 2011

Germany is preparing for the inevitable:

Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government is preparing plans to shore up German banks in the event that Greece fails to meet the terms of its aid package and defaults, three coalition officials said.

The emergency plan involves measures to help banks and insurers that face a possible 50 percent loss on their Greek bonds if the next tranche of Greece’s bailout is withheld, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the deliberations are being held in private. The successor to the German government’s bank-rescue fund introduced in 2008 might be enrolled to help recapitalize the banks, one of the people said.

Meanwhile, the ECB is losing credibility daily:

Juergen Stark resigned from the European Central Bank’s Executive Board after protesting the bank’s bond purchases on a conference call earlier this week, said a euro-area central bank official familiar with the meeting.

During the Sept. 4 call, Stark, 63, expressed his strong opposition to the program, which was expanded last month when the ECB started buying Italian and Spanish bonds, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions are confidential. Stark was supported by the central banks of Austria and the Netherlands, the person said. The resignation of Stark, the ECB’s chief economist, is a blow to the bank, the official said, noting he is the second German ECB member after Axel Weber to leave over the bond program.

Stark’s resignation, less than two months before President Jean-Claude Trichet’s term ends, suggests policy makers are increasingly split over the best way to fight Europe’s debt crisis.

All in all, it was an interesting day:

Treasuries rallied, pushing 10-year note yields to a record low, as a surge in European bank and sovereign-credit risk to all-time highs on speculation Greece may default bolstered the refuge appeal of U.S. government debt.

Yields on 10-year notes dropped six basis points, or 0.06 percentage point, to 1.92 percent at 4:02 p.m. in New York, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader prices. The 2.125 percent securities maturing in August 2021 gained 17/32, or $5.31 per $1,000 face amount, to 101 27/32.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index tumbled 2.7 percent. The Stoxx Europe 600 Index fell 2.6 percent. Gold futures for December delivery gained 0.6 percent to $1,869.20 an ounce. Prices rose to a record $1,923.70 on Sept. 6.

The 10-year yields had a weekly drop of seven basis points after falling to 1.8942 percent, the lowest level on record in Federal Reserve data going back to 1953. The yields earlier advanced four basis points to 2.02 percent.

The WSJ opined on YLO.PR.A a few days ago:

From March to December 2012, Yellow Media has an option to convert the preferred stock to common stock. Importantly, Yellow Media gets to exchange the securities at a rate of C$2 per common share so long as the stock trades below that level. With the common stock now trading at about 84 Canadian cents, the company stands to issue common stock valued at just C$111 million, rather than paying C$264 million in cash.

The company said in early August that it still plans to purchase the preferred shares with cash. Unlike private equity, which typically enjoys outright control, Yellow Media’s shareholders can’t force the company to make preferred investors take the hit. But Yellow Media shouldn’t be scared to act itself.

YLO.PR.A was down $4.47 on the week (from 17.07 to 12.60), a drop of over 25%, presumably related to this opinion. The other issues were down as well, but less dramatically.

YLO has been deleted from the S&P/TSX 60 and is now merely a member of the Completion index.

YLO had no TMX-reported insider trading nor any SEDI-reported filings again today. I’m going to keep checking, but this will be the last negative report for a while, anyway.

DBRS confirmed CCS at Pfd-3(high).

It was a good day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts winning 22bp, FixedResets up 5bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 1bp. Volatility was good. Volume was below average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1145 % 2,154.5
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1145 % 3,240.3
Floater 3.00 % 3.36 % 57,800 18.78 3 0.1145 % 2,326.3
OpRet 4.81 % 2.85 % 65,434 1.66 8 -0.1011 % 2,452.6
SplitShare 5.37 % 0.55 % 53,958 0.47 4 -0.1112 % 2,498.4
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1011 % 2,242.7
Perpetual-Premium 5.62 % 3.87 % 125,947 0.25 16 -0.0577 % 2,116.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.28 % 5.34 % 111,204 14.87 14 0.2185 % 2,250.3
FixedReset 5.14 % 3.05 % 202,946 2.71 59 0.0514 % 2,332.9
Deemed-Retractible 5.03 % 4.59 % 242,761 4.14 46 0.0061 % 2,202.1
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.B Floater -1.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-09
Maturity Price : 15.81
Evaluated at bid price : 15.81
Bid-YTW : 3.36 %
BAM.PR.O OpRet 1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.04
Bid-YTW : 3.19 %
MFC.PR.F FixedReset 1.18 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.95
Bid-YTW : 3.48 %
ELF.PR.G Perpetual-Discount 1.22 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-09
Maturity Price : 21.65
Evaluated at bid price : 21.65
Bid-YTW : 5.58 %
PWF.PR.A Floater 1.41 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-09
Maturity Price : 20.90
Evaluated at bid price : 20.90
Bid-YTW : 2.52 %
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.59 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-09
Maturity Price : 24.62
Evaluated at bid price : 24.91
Bid-YTW : 4.94 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
PWF.PR.M FixedReset 151,904 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 27.10; TD crossed 50,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.00
Bid-YTW : 2.81 %
RY.PR.G Deemed-Retractible 68,568 RBC crossed 50,000 at 24.93.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.84
Bid-YTW : 4.63 %
BMO.PR.J Deemed-Retractible 59,990 Anonymous bought 10,000 from RBC at 25.16.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.13
Bid-YTW : 4.44 %
SLF.PR.H FixedReset 58,700 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.82
Bid-YTW : 3.85 %
BMO.PR.P FixedReset 54,354 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 26.95.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.95
Bid-YTW : 3.09 %
MFC.PR.F FixedReset 52,435 Anonymous bought 10,000 from Nesbitt at 24.95.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.95
Bid-YTW : 3.48 %
There were 26 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BNA.PR.E SplitShare Quote: 23.06 – 23.61
Spot Rate : 0.5500
Average : 0.4231

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2017-12-10
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.06
Bid-YTW : 6.42 %

BAM.PR.T FixedReset Quote: 24.90 – 25.20
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.1848

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-09
Maturity Price : 23.09
Evaluated at bid price : 24.90
Bid-YTW : 3.84 %

NA.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 27.15 – 27.58
Spot Rate : 0.4300
Average : 0.3171

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-15
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.15
Bid-YTW : 3.12 %

PWF.PR.I Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.50 – 25.79
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1890

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-10-09
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.50
Bid-YTW : 1.79 %

PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.25 – 24.54
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1960

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-09
Maturity Price : 23.96
Evaluated at bid price : 24.25
Bid-YTW : 5.31 %

POW.PR.D Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.15 – 24.55
Spot Rate : 0.4000
Average : 0.3197

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-09
Maturity Price : 23.86
Evaluated at bid price : 24.15
Bid-YTW : 5.24 %