Issue Comments

GWO.PR.E / GWO.PR.X : Issuer Bid Update

With the release of the Great-West Lifeco full year financials we can have a look at the progress of the issuer bid on their retractible preferreds – a bid which, I repeat ad nauseum, casts considerable doubt as to whether these issues will survive past their first redemption date.

GWO Retractible Shares Outstanding
Issue 4Q05 1Q06 2Q06 3Q06 4Q06
GWO.PR.E 7,978,900 7,978,900 7,978,900 7,978,900 7,978,900
GWO.PR.X 23,499,915 23,499,915 23,022,915 22,422,215 22,282,215

…which allows us to calculate the changes…

GWO Changes in Retractible Shares Outstanding
Issue 4Q05 1Q06 2Q06 3Q06 4Q06
GWO.PR.E N/A 0 0 0 0
GWO.PR.X N/A 0 -477,000 -600,700 -140,000

We can also look at some graphs of GWO.PR.X data over the past year:

These shares pay $1.20 p.a.; if we assume that the average “accrued dividend” was $0.15, then the average price Great-West actually paid ($27.39) can be reduced to $27.24 flat-bid-price equivalent – which I find surprisingly high, given that the FBP was well below this level from about May 15 to August 31, as shown on the FBP graph. This was the same period in which average volume declined from its high for the year of about 8,000 shares per day to about 4,000.

All that aside, it seems that GWO has shown a clear intention to get these shares off its books at the first opportunity – the only surprise is that they are willing to buy them at such a paltry YTW. Why not stick the money in something else and save it for the (extremely big!) redemption at $26.00?  

Update : I forgot the links to aid navigation! The issuer bid was last discussed January 25; it remains to be seen how the cash required for the Putnam Purchase will affect the buyback.

Programme Changes

HIMIPref™ Programming Change : Error Code #4644

In response to a complaint from an extremely annoying person (and you know who you are!), reporting has been enhanced for Error Code #4644.

This error arises when the user attempts to run a trade report for a portfolio that should include some actual value (which is to say, any portfolio that is not using the issueMethod with desiredSwapIssues set to zero; such a portfolio should have zero value, as its purpose in life is to form a grid of all trading possibilities in the HIMIPref™ universe, with no regard for other holdings).

The error message connected with code #4644 was, admittedly, a little obscure. The message has now been upgraded to specify the accountName, accountNumber and other information similar to that provided on the portfolioReportBox. It is anticipated that this detail will make it more clear to the user what is to be done; the new error code for this condition is #5419.

The error most often arises when the portfolio has been set up improperly, or if the holdings file has been inadverdantly wiped. The portfolio settings may be edited via the portfolioListReport, or the holdings file may be mainMenu|File|Holdings File|Synchronize With Transactions, which (alas) is not yet documented in the glossary or the User Manual. *sigh*

This programming change is not considered significant enough to warrant the upload of a new HIMIPref™ version; it will be available when the next version is uploaded.

Issue Comments

DBRS Confirms TCA.PR.X / TCA.PR.Y at Pfd-2(low)

DBRS today confirmed that TransCanada Pipeline’s preferred issues will remain rated Pfd-2(low), as foreshadowed when equity financing was announced.

The rating confirmations reflect the realization of TCPL’s intention as stated at the time of the proposal to finance the acquisitions with substantial amount of equity to maintain its current credit standing. The recent subscription receipt issuance of C$1.5 billion will result in TCPL’s key credit metrics being maintained at similar levels as at December 31, 2006. DBRS estimates consolidated debt-to-capital ratio of approximately 63% to 64% and cash flow debt ratio of 0.17 times on a pro-forma basis (DBRS adjusted). These credit ratios are based on TC Pipe being consolidated into TCPL as in the prior year. The equity issuance removes the previous concern of potential weakening of TCPL’s financial profile during the interim debt financing of the acquisitions at closing.

Market Action

February 22, 2007

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.11% 4.13% 25,821 17.17 1 -0.0398% 1,043.6
Fixed-Floater 4.82% 3.75% 83,765 6.25 7 -0.1339% 1,040.6
Floater 4.48% -19.51% 55,890 3.36 5 -0.0621% 1,047.6
Op. Retract 4.71% 2.21% 75,053 2.06 18 -0.0521% 1,030.5
Split-Share 5.09% 0.56% 247,360 2.68 14 +0.0424% 1,045.6
Interest Bearing 6.45% 3.27% 61,399 2.36 5 +0.2939% 1,042.6
Perpetual-Premium 5.03% 3.89% 217,077 5.02 51 -0.0622% 1,053.6
Perpetual-Discount 4.53% 4.55% 1,110,515 16.32 11 -0.0140% 1,060.9
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
CM.PR.P PerpetualPremium -1.1735% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.07% based on a bid of $26.95 and a call 2012-11-28 at $25.00.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
MFC.PR.C PerpetualDiscount 80,725 Scotia crossed 50,000 at 24.90. This issue went ex-dividend today. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.52% based on a bid of $24.85 and a limitMaturity.
GWO.PR.F PerpetualPremium 53,285 TD crossed 47,800 at $28.10. This is the highest priced issue in the PerpetualPremium index and helps to justify a prejudice against premia by sporting a pre-tax bid-YTW of 1.84% based on a bid of $27.87 and a call 2008-10-30 at $26.00. Obviously, there are people who are prepared to slap their money down and bet on a call 2012-10-30 at $25, which will yield 3.84% (pre-tax) … but I’m not one of them! At an annual dividend of $1.475, there’s just too much chance GWO will refinance … but as I’ve said before, I’d be a lot happier if I knew exactly why CL.PR.B still exists!
CM.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 100,455 Recent new issue. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.53% based on a bid of $24.91 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.K Floater 40,333 Scotia crossed 40,000 at $24.95.
GWO.PR.X Retractible 39,759 Desjardins crossed 13,000 at $27.55, Scotia crossed 25,000 at $27.57. This is one of the issues subject to the issuer bid, which may (MAY!) have been de-railed by Great-West’s Putnam Purchase. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 2.59% based on a bid of $27.55 and a call 2009-10-30 at $26.00 … buyers are hoping for a softMaturity 2013-09-29 at $25.00, yielding 3.21%. The latter figure is the interest-equivalent for Ontario fat cats of a whopping 4.49%. I note that Great-West LIFE (which is GWL, the insurance company, not GWO, the parent, so this is not a precise comparison) has some 5.995% 12/31/12 Tier 1 paper outstanding, indicated at 49bp over Canadas, or about 4.53%, so I fail to see any great attraction in this (preferred) issue, which is one step further away from the actual cash coming in the door.

There were thirteen other “$25 p.v. equivalent” index-included issues with over 10,000 shares traded today.

New Issues

New Issue : Dundee Wealth Management, Pfd-3, 4.75%

Dundee Wealth Management has announced (via CCN Matthews) that:

it has entered into a “bought deal” agreement to sell to a syndicate of underwriters led by Scotia Capital Inc. and Dundee Securities Corporation, 6,000,000 4.75% Cumulative Redeemable First Preference Shares, Series 1 (the “Series 1 Shares”) at a price of $25.00 per Series 1 Share for gross proceeds to Dundee Wealth of $150 million. The underwriters also have an over-allotment option, exercisable at any time prior to 30 days after the closing date, to acquire an additional 900,000 Series 1 Shares at the issue price of $25.00 per Series 1 Share. The offering is expected to close on or about March 13, 2007.

DBRS has rated this issue Pfd-3.

I am advised that this issue is a 10-year retractible – but I have not yet been advised in writing! This issue is of sufficient size to be added to the HIMIPref™ database. I will provide more details and analysis when it becomes available.

Update & Bump : I have received a term sheet.

Annual dividends are $1.1875 per share per annum. The first dividend is intended to be payable June 30, 2007 and be $0.35625, based on the anticipated closing date of March 13, 2007.

The redemption schedule is:

 
If called during the 12 months commencing March 13, Redemption Price
2007 27.25
2008 27.00
2009 26.75
2010 26.50
2011 26.25
2012 26.00
2013 25.75
2014 25.50
2015 25.25
Or any time after March 13, 2016 $25.00

Any redemption before March 13, 2012 is limited to circumstances where the Series 1 Shares are entitled to vote separately as a class or series by law.

The shares are retractible for cash at the option of the holder on and after March 13, 2017 at $25.00.

Another Update & Bump!

I have prepared the following table with some comparatives:

Dundee Wealth New Issue & Comparitives
Data DW.PR.? BAM.PR.J DC.PR.A
Price due to base-rate 24.63  26.51  25.17
Price due to short-term -0.55  -0.57  -0.53
Price due to long-term 1.71  1.77  1.64
Price to to Cumulative Dividends 0.00  0.00  0.00
Price due to SplitShareCorp 0.00  0.00  0.00
Price due to Retractibility 1.26  1.40  1.16
Price due to Liquidity 0.77  -0.11  0.03
Price due to Floating Rate 0.00  0.00  0.00
Price due to Credit Spread (2) 0.00  -0.33  0.00
Price due to Credit Spread (3) -0.94  0.00  -0.86
Price due to Credit Spread (High) 0.00  0.00  0.00
Price due to Credit Spread (Low) 0.00  -0.29  -0.24
Price due to error 0.02  0.04  0.07
Curve Price (Taxable Curve)  26.90  28.42  26.44
Quote 2/22  25.00
Issue
 27.82-86  25.55-70
YTW (after tax)  3.77%  3.34%  3.84%
YTW Date  2017-3-12  2014-4-30  2016-6-29
Credit Rating (DBRS)  Pfd-3  Pfd-2(low)  Pfd-3(low)
YTW (Pre-Tax) 4.75% 4.20% 4.83%
YTW Modified Duration (Pre-Tax) 7.98 5.98 7.40
YTW Pseudo-Convexity (Pre-Tax) 0.2 -11.9 0.2

Note that the BAM.PR.J has a soft-maturity 2018-3-30 at $25.00 to yield 3.35% – it’s right on the bubble, which is why the pseudoConvexityWorst is both large and negative.

This new issue looks attractive when valued in strict accordance to the yield curve. But as I warned in my post about the YPG New Issue:

As credit quality decreases, so does the quality of HIMIPref™’s yield curve analysis. I do not recommend that these prefs be considered for more than 5% of a diversified preferred share portfolio.

HIMI Preferred Indices

HIMIPref™ Indices : January 1998

All indices were assigned a value of 1000.0 as of December 31, 1993.

HIMI Index Values 1998-01-30
Index Closing Value (Total Return) Issues Mean Credit Quality Median YTW Median DTW Median Daily Trading Mean Current Yield
Ratchet 1,584.6 0 0 0 0 0 0
FixedFloater 1,535.3 9 2.00 4.47% 15.8 280M 5.08%
Floater 1,492.1 5 1.80 4.35% 16.2 134M 4.73%
OpRet 1,316.3 30 1.26 4.31% 4.1 88M 6.08%
SplitShare 1,364.5 2 1.50 4.84% 4.9 60M 5.32%
Interest-Bearing 1,316.3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perpetual-Premium 1,234.3 5 1.00 5.30% 1.7 133M 7.16%
Perpetual-Discount 1,192.8 0 0 0 0 0 0

Index Constitution, 1998-01-30, Pre-rebalancing

Index Constitution, 1998-01-30, Post-rebalancing

Better Communication, Please!

BNA.PR.C : First Dividend Still Unconfirmed

As previously noted, I’m having difficulties with this dividend! Dividend dates for this issue have been estimated as 2/26, 2/28, 3/7, even though the BNA.PR.A / BNA.PR.B dates are 2/20, 2/22, 3/7.

However, neither Bloomberg nor the TSX Data service are showing the BNA.PR.C dividend.

I don’t know what to do about this. The company has responded to my initial query about the dividend itself (which they say is the same as the other two) but not (as yet) to my follow-up, asking when the dividend on BNA.PR.C was declared. This is something of a  point (in terms of checking for possible administrative foul-ups) because BNA.PR.C did not exist when the other dividends were declared (December 4 or 5, take your pick).

I’ll try again tomorrow, February 23, to get some answers.

Until then (at least!), the dividend dates on HIMIPref™ will remain as 2/26, 2/28, 3/7, but it’s only a guess! Since HIMIPref™ will evaluate the issue on a cum-dividend basis, whereas it might be ex-dividend, I recommend that any HIMIPref™ valuation leading to a purchase of BNA.PR.C be ignored until this matter is cleared up.

 

Miscellaneous News

Par Value

This is an interesting, albeit trivial, topic.

I entered into a discussion on Wikipedia about Par Value on Preferred Stock. Somebody had queried a statement in the article:

Preferred stock has a par value or liquidation value associated with it. This represents the amount of capital that was contributed to the corporation when the shares were first issued.

and complained:

What is this? Par value is an amount set by the articles of organization or bylaws (need research as to which one) as to the value of the preferred stock. The proceeds actually contributed to the corporation is almost always higher than the par value, especially since we’re talking about preferred stock here (and not common stock). The proceeds actually collected for the issuance of the stock is actually: Par value + Additional-paid-in-capital. APIC has not even been discussed in the article

I asked for some examples and was referred to Northrop Grumman preferred B and Realty Income Corp., 7 3/8% Preferred D, both US stocks where, in fact, liquidation value or subscription price is very different from par value.

A little worried, I checked to see what was on line. CIBC Investors Edge states:

Par Value

The stated face value of a bond or, in the case of stock, an amount assigned by the company’s charter and expressed as a dollar amount per share. Par value of common stock usually has no relationship to the current market value and so no par value stock is issued. Par value of preferred stock is significant, however, as it indicates the dollar amount of assets each preferred share would be entitled to in the event of liquidation of the company.

National Bank states:

Par Value

The stated face value of a bond or, in the case of stock, an amount assigned by the company’s charter and expressed as a dollar amount per share. Par value of common stock usually has no relationship to the current market value and so no par value stock is issued. Par value of preferred stock is significant, however, as it indicates the dollar amount of assets each preferred share would be entitled to in the event of liquidation of the company.

According to GlobeInvestor:

Par Value:

The stated face value of a bond or, in the case of stock, an amount assigned by the company’s charter and expressed as a dollar amount per share. Par value of common stock usually has no relationship to the current market value and so no par value stock is issued. Par value of preferred stock is significant, however, as it indicates the dollar amount of assets each preferred share would be entitled to in the event of liquidation of the company.

It does my heart good to see such unanimity!

IFIC states:

Par value: The principal amount, or value at maturity, of a debt obligation. It is also known as the denomination or face value. Preferred shares may also have par value, which indicates the value of assets each share would be entitled to if a company were liquidated.

which is echoed by AIM Trimark

Par value – The principal amount, or value at maturity, of a debt obligation. It is also known as the denomination or face value. Preferred shares may also have par value, which indicates the value of assets each share would be entitled to if a company were liquidated.

The Journal of Accountancy states:

Preferred shares pay a fixed quarterly dividend based on a stated par value. If XYZ Corp. issues a preferred stock with a par value of $50 and paying a quarterly 2% dividend, that’s a $1 dividend each quarter.

citing riskGlossary.com, which further states

However, preferred shares are superior to common shares. No dividends may be paid to holders of common stock unless dividends to preferred shareholders are also paid in full. In liquidation, preferred shareholders are entitled to at least their par value before common shareholders can receive anything.

RiskGlossary, in its discussion of par value, further states:

For common stocks, par value became a stated minimum issue price. In the United States, a corporation could issue stock at a price in excess of par value. If it issued the stock below par value, the stock was called watered. Purchasers of watered stock were liable to the corporation for the difference between the par value and the price they paid. Today, in many jurisdictions, par values are no longer required for common stocks. In jurisdictions that still require them, corporations typically state nominal par values, perhaps listing a USD .01 par value for a stock that will be issued at USD 25.00. 

For preferred stocks, par value remains relevant. Preferred stock is typically issued at a price close to the par value. Preferred stock dividends are calculated as a percentage of par value. Also, if common stock is callable, it is usually at par value or at a small premium over par value.

It would appear, then, that if I was mistaken, I am in good company!

But on the other hand, par value isn’t really formally spoken about much, at least in Canada. For instance, the Bank of Montreal states:

We are authorized by our shareholders to issue an unlimited number of Class A Preferred Shares and Class B Preferred Shares without par value, in series, for unlimited consideration. Class B Preferred Shares may be issued in non-Canadian currency.

In the prospectus for the recent Sun Life Financial issue, the phrase “par value” is not found anywhere.

I do, however, see a recent ruling regarding Canfor that states:

At the end of the series of steps comprising the Arrangement, the authorized share capital of Canfor will consist of 1,010,000,000 shares divided into 1,000,000,000 common shares without par value and 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $25 each. At June 5, 2006 there were 142,540,059 common shares issued and outstanding and no preferred shares is sued and outstanding.

so the words “par value” are not completely unknown in formal description, anyway!

If you’ve read all the way down to here expecting an earthshaking revelation, then I’m very sorry to disappoint you: there ain’t none. However, any insights anybody would like to share with me about “Par Value” and any legal weight the phrase might have or, perhaps, the insistence of certain jurisdictions (which ones?) that insist on all issues being assigned a par value of some kind will be very gratefully ripped off and presented as the fruits of my own research.

Unless requested otherwise!

Update : The State of Delaware has some interesting tax rules based on their Franchise Tax:

To use this method, you must give figures for all issued shares (including treasury shares) and total gross assets in the spaces provided in your Annual Franchise Tax Report.  Total Gross Assets shall be those “total assets” reported on the U.S. Form 1120, Schedule L (Federal Return) relative to the company’s fiscal year ending the calendar year of the report.  The tax rate under this method is $250.00 per million or portion of a million of the assumed par value capital, which is calculated as described below, if the assumed par value capital is greater than $1,000,000.  If the assumed par value capital is less than $1,000,000, the tax is calculated by dividing the assumed par value capital by $1,000,000 then multiplying that result by $250.00.  

The example cited below is for a corporation having 1,000,000 shares of stock with a par value of $1.00 and 250,000 shares of stock with a par value of $5.00 , gross assets of $1,000,000.00 and issued shares totaling 485,000.

  1. Divide your total gross assets by your total issued shares carrying to 6 decimal places.  The result is your “assumed par”.Example: $1,000,000 assets, 485,000 issued shares = $2.061856 assumed par.
  2. Multiply the assumed par by the number of authorized shares having a par value of less than the assumed par.Example: $2.061856 assumed par s 1,000,000 shares = $2,061,856.
  3. Multiply the number of authorized shares with a par value greater than the assumed par by their respective par value.Example: 250,000 shares s $5.00 par value = $1,250,000
  4. Add the results of #2 and #3 above.  The result is your assumed par value capital.Example:  $2,061,856 plus 1,250,000 = $3,311 956 assumed par value capital.
  5. Figure your tax by dividing the assumed par value capital, rounded up to the next million if it is over $1,000,000, by 1,000,000 and then multiply by $250.00.Example: 4 x $250.00 = $1,000.00

NOTE: If an amendment changing your stock or par value was filed with the Division of Corporations during the year, issued shares and total gross assets within 30 days of the amendment must be given for each portion of the year during which each distinct authorized amount of capital stock or par value was in effect.  The tax is then prorated for each portion of the year dividing the number of days the stock/par value was in effect by 365 days (366 leap year), then multiplying this result by the tax calculated for that portion of the year.  The total tax for the year is the sum of all the prorated taxes for each portion of the year.

Harvard Business Services also states:

Since your annual Delaware franchise taxes are based on your number of shares and their par-value, it is best to keep both of these as low as you can.

If you need more than 1,500 shares of stock initially, it becomes expensive to issue “no-par” stock. By placing a small par-value on your stock you can save a significant tax bite.

Par-value has no relation to “market value” or “stock price”, except that you cannot sell stock for less than par. Therefore, if you plan on issuing yourself stock for starting the company, you may want to consider keeping your par-value low. This does not limit you with respect to stock price when you sell shares of stock to investors.

Hat-tip to Art LaPella on Wikipedia for showing me this.

Update Oklahoma also charges fees based on declared par-value:

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION (Domestic Business or Professional): One-tenth of one percent (1/10th of 1%) of the authorized capital stock. No par value is based on $50.00 per share, for computing filing fees only. 18 O.S., §1142 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MINIMUM: $50.00

Although, as far as I can make out, they don’t charge continuing taxes based on par-value. The incorporation fees are also charged when articles of incorporation are amended:

If the authorized capital is increased in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), the filing fee shall be an amount equal to one-tenth of one percent (1/10 of 1%) of such increase.

which leads to amusing situations … or, at least, situations I consider amusing, such as American Natural Energy Corp.’s amendment in which the number of authorized common shares was increased from 100-million with a par value of $0.01 to 250-million with a par value of $0.001.

Update, 2011-11-24: See the second section of Security Transaction Taxes and Market Quality for an entertaining account of Par Value as it relates to common stock and trading in New York when it had a securities transaction tax.

Miscellaneous News

eMail Problems!

My service provider, Bell Canada, seems to be doing extensive maintenance on their eMail system. Over the past day or so, I have been told on several occasions that access to my eMail is “forbidden” and I have recently been told by a client that an eMail that was sent to me bounced back, on the grounds that my mailbox was full.

So … if you really need to contact me, use the ‘phone! 416-604-4204.

But with any luck my eMail will be fixed soon.

Market Action

February 21, 2007

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.10% 4.12% 26,137 17.19 1 -0.0796% 1,044.0
Fixed-Floater 4.81% 3.72% 85,328 8.17 7 -0.1903% 1,042.0
Floater 4.48% -20.50% 55,143 3.34 5 +0.0657% 1,048.3
Op. Retract 4.71% 2.40% 74,002 2.06 18 -0.0911% 1,031.0
Split-Share 5.09% 0.75% 253,022 2.69 14 -0.0561% 1,045.2
Interest Bearing 6.47% 3.53% 60,141 2.36 5 +0.0525% 1,039.5
Perpetual-Premium 5.03% 3.77% 219,626 5.02 51 -0.0350% 1,054.2
Perpetual-Discount 4.52% 4.55% 1,098,440 15.49 11 +0.0220% 1,061.1
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
There were no index-included issues with extraordinary performance today.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
CM.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 100,455 Recent new issue. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.53% based on a bid of $24.94 and a limitMaturity
WN.PR.B OpRet 43,790 Credit watch negative! Scotia crossed 23,300 at $26.05, then Desjardines crossed 20,000 at the same price. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.71% based on a bid of $26.00 and softMaturity 2009-6-30 at $25.00. That’s an interest equivalent of 5.19% at standard equivalency … I note that the Weston bonds, 6.45%/11, are trading 44bp back of Canadas, call it maybe 4.50%.
BMO.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 24,155 Recent new issue. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.51% based on a bid of $25.13 and either a call 2016-3-26 at $25.00, or a limitMaturity, take your pick.
RY.PR.A PerpetualDiscount 23,135 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.47% based on a bid of $24.95 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.D PerpetualPremium 22,700 RBC bought 16,400 from various dealers in six tranches at $25.19-20 (and another 3,700 in three tranches later in the afternoon). Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.54% based on a bid of $25.12 and a limitMaturity.

There were twenty-three other “$25 p.v. equivalent” index-included issues with over 10,000 shares traded today.