Archive for February, 2007

HIMIPref™ Indices : January 1998

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

All indices were assigned a value of 1000.0 as of December 31, 1993.

HIMI Index Values 1998-01-30
Index Closing Value (Total Return) Issues Mean Credit Quality Median YTW Median DTW Median Daily Trading Mean Current Yield
Ratchet 1,584.6 0 0 0 0 0 0
FixedFloater 1,535.3 9 2.00 4.47% 15.8 280M 5.08%
Floater 1,492.1 5 1.80 4.35% 16.2 134M 4.73%
OpRet 1,316.3 30 1.26 4.31% 4.1 88M 6.08%
SplitShare 1,364.5 2 1.50 4.84% 4.9 60M 5.32%
Interest-Bearing 1,316.3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perpetual-Premium 1,234.3 5 1.00 5.30% 1.7 133M 7.16%
Perpetual-Discount 1,192.8 0 0 0 0 0 0

Index Constitution, 1998-01-30, Pre-rebalancing

Index Constitution, 1998-01-30, Post-rebalancing

BNA.PR.C : First Dividend Still Unconfirmed

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

As previously noted, I’m having difficulties with this dividend! Dividend dates for this issue have been estimated as 2/26, 2/28, 3/7, even though the BNA.PR.A / BNA.PR.B dates are 2/20, 2/22, 3/7.

However, neither Bloomberg nor the TSX Data service are showing the BNA.PR.C dividend.

I don’t know what to do about this. The company has responded to my initial query about the dividend itself (which they say is the same as the other two) but not (as yet) to my follow-up, asking when the dividend on BNA.PR.C was declared. This is something of a  point (in terms of checking for possible administrative foul-ups) because BNA.PR.C did not exist when the other dividends were declared (December 4 or 5, take your pick).

I’ll try again tomorrow, February 23, to get some answers.

Until then (at least!), the dividend dates on HIMIPref™ will remain as 2/26, 2/28, 3/7, but it’s only a guess! Since HIMIPref™ will evaluate the issue on a cum-dividend basis, whereas it might be ex-dividend, I recommend that any HIMIPref™ valuation leading to a purchase of BNA.PR.C be ignored until this matter is cleared up.

 

Par Value

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

This is an interesting, albeit trivial, topic.

I entered into a discussion on Wikipedia about Par Value on Preferred Stock. Somebody had queried a statement in the article:

Preferred stock has a par value or liquidation value associated with it. This represents the amount of capital that was contributed to the corporation when the shares were first issued.

and complained:

What is this? Par value is an amount set by the articles of organization or bylaws (need research as to which one) as to the value of the preferred stock. The proceeds actually contributed to the corporation is almost always higher than the par value, especially since we’re talking about preferred stock here (and not common stock). The proceeds actually collected for the issuance of the stock is actually: Par value + Additional-paid-in-capital. APIC has not even been discussed in the article

I asked for some examples and was referred to Northrop Grumman preferred B and Realty Income Corp., 7 3/8% Preferred D, both US stocks where, in fact, liquidation value or subscription price is very different from par value.

A little worried, I checked to see what was on line. CIBC Investors Edge states:

Par Value

The stated face value of a bond or, in the case of stock, an amount assigned by the company’s charter and expressed as a dollar amount per share. Par value of common stock usually has no relationship to the current market value and so no par value stock is issued. Par value of preferred stock is significant, however, as it indicates the dollar amount of assets each preferred share would be entitled to in the event of liquidation of the company.

National Bank states:

Par Value

The stated face value of a bond or, in the case of stock, an amount assigned by the company’s charter and expressed as a dollar amount per share. Par value of common stock usually has no relationship to the current market value and so no par value stock is issued. Par value of preferred stock is significant, however, as it indicates the dollar amount of assets each preferred share would be entitled to in the event of liquidation of the company.

According to GlobeInvestor:

Par Value:

The stated face value of a bond or, in the case of stock, an amount assigned by the company’s charter and expressed as a dollar amount per share. Par value of common stock usually has no relationship to the current market value and so no par value stock is issued. Par value of preferred stock is significant, however, as it indicates the dollar amount of assets each preferred share would be entitled to in the event of liquidation of the company.

It does my heart good to see such unanimity!

IFIC states:

Par value: The principal amount, or value at maturity, of a debt obligation. It is also known as the denomination or face value. Preferred shares may also have par value, which indicates the value of assets each share would be entitled to if a company were liquidated.

which is echoed by AIM Trimark

Par value – The principal amount, or value at maturity, of a debt obligation. It is also known as the denomination or face value. Preferred shares may also have par value, which indicates the value of assets each share would be entitled to if a company were liquidated.

The Journal of Accountancy states:

Preferred shares pay a fixed quarterly dividend based on a stated par value. If XYZ Corp. issues a preferred stock with a par value of $50 and paying a quarterly 2% dividend, that’s a $1 dividend each quarter.

citing riskGlossary.com, which further states

However, preferred shares are superior to common shares. No dividends may be paid to holders of common stock unless dividends to preferred shareholders are also paid in full. In liquidation, preferred shareholders are entitled to at least their par value before common shareholders can receive anything.

RiskGlossary, in its discussion of par value, further states:

For common stocks, par value became a stated minimum issue price. In the United States, a corporation could issue stock at a price in excess of par value. If it issued the stock below par value, the stock was called watered. Purchasers of watered stock were liable to the corporation for the difference between the par value and the price they paid. Today, in many jurisdictions, par values are no longer required for common stocks. In jurisdictions that still require them, corporations typically state nominal par values, perhaps listing a USD .01 par value for a stock that will be issued at USD 25.00. 

For preferred stocks, par value remains relevant. Preferred stock is typically issued at a price close to the par value. Preferred stock dividends are calculated as a percentage of par value. Also, if common stock is callable, it is usually at par value or at a small premium over par value.

It would appear, then, that if I was mistaken, I am in good company!

But on the other hand, par value isn’t really formally spoken about much, at least in Canada. For instance, the Bank of Montreal states:

We are authorized by our shareholders to issue an unlimited number of Class A Preferred Shares and Class B Preferred Shares without par value, in series, for unlimited consideration. Class B Preferred Shares may be issued in non-Canadian currency.

In the prospectus for the recent Sun Life Financial issue, the phrase “par value” is not found anywhere.

I do, however, see a recent ruling regarding Canfor that states:

At the end of the series of steps comprising the Arrangement, the authorized share capital of Canfor will consist of 1,010,000,000 shares divided into 1,000,000,000 common shares without par value and 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $25 each. At June 5, 2006 there were 142,540,059 common shares issued and outstanding and no preferred shares is sued and outstanding.

so the words “par value” are not completely unknown in formal description, anyway!

If you’ve read all the way down to here expecting an earthshaking revelation, then I’m very sorry to disappoint you: there ain’t none. However, any insights anybody would like to share with me about “Par Value” and any legal weight the phrase might have or, perhaps, the insistence of certain jurisdictions (which ones?) that insist on all issues being assigned a par value of some kind will be very gratefully ripped off and presented as the fruits of my own research.

Unless requested otherwise!

Update : The State of Delaware has some interesting tax rules based on their Franchise Tax:

To use this method, you must give figures for all issued shares (including treasury shares) and total gross assets in the spaces provided in your Annual Franchise Tax Report.  Total Gross Assets shall be those “total assets” reported on the U.S. Form 1120, Schedule L (Federal Return) relative to the company’s fiscal year ending the calendar year of the report.  The tax rate under this method is $250.00 per million or portion of a million of the assumed par value capital, which is calculated as described below, if the assumed par value capital is greater than $1,000,000.  If the assumed par value capital is less than $1,000,000, the tax is calculated by dividing the assumed par value capital by $1,000,000 then multiplying that result by $250.00.  

The example cited below is for a corporation having 1,000,000 shares of stock with a par value of $1.00 and 250,000 shares of stock with a par value of $5.00 , gross assets of $1,000,000.00 and issued shares totaling 485,000.

  1. Divide your total gross assets by your total issued shares carrying to 6 decimal places.  The result is your “assumed par”.Example: $1,000,000 assets, 485,000 issued shares = $2.061856 assumed par.
  2. Multiply the assumed par by the number of authorized shares having a par value of less than the assumed par.Example: $2.061856 assumed par s 1,000,000 shares = $2,061,856.
  3. Multiply the number of authorized shares with a par value greater than the assumed par by their respective par value.Example: 250,000 shares s $5.00 par value = $1,250,000
  4. Add the results of #2 and #3 above.  The result is your assumed par value capital.Example:  $2,061,856 plus 1,250,000 = $3,311 956 assumed par value capital.
  5. Figure your tax by dividing the assumed par value capital, rounded up to the next million if it is over $1,000,000, by 1,000,000 and then multiply by $250.00.Example: 4 x $250.00 = $1,000.00

NOTE: If an amendment changing your stock or par value was filed with the Division of Corporations during the year, issued shares and total gross assets within 30 days of the amendment must be given for each portion of the year during which each distinct authorized amount of capital stock or par value was in effect.  The tax is then prorated for each portion of the year dividing the number of days the stock/par value was in effect by 365 days (366 leap year), then multiplying this result by the tax calculated for that portion of the year.  The total tax for the year is the sum of all the prorated taxes for each portion of the year.

Harvard Business Services also states:

Since your annual Delaware franchise taxes are based on your number of shares and their par-value, it is best to keep both of these as low as you can.

If you need more than 1,500 shares of stock initially, it becomes expensive to issue “no-par” stock. By placing a small par-value on your stock you can save a significant tax bite.

Par-value has no relation to “market value” or “stock price”, except that you cannot sell stock for less than par. Therefore, if you plan on issuing yourself stock for starting the company, you may want to consider keeping your par-value low. This does not limit you with respect to stock price when you sell shares of stock to investors.

Hat-tip to Art LaPella on Wikipedia for showing me this.

Update Oklahoma also charges fees based on declared par-value:

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION (Domestic Business or Professional): One-tenth of one percent (1/10th of 1%) of the authorized capital stock. No par value is based on $50.00 per share, for computing filing fees only. 18 O.S., §1142 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MINIMUM: $50.00

Although, as far as I can make out, they don’t charge continuing taxes based on par-value. The incorporation fees are also charged when articles of incorporation are amended:

If the authorized capital is increased in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), the filing fee shall be an amount equal to one-tenth of one percent (1/10 of 1%) of such increase.

which leads to amusing situations … or, at least, situations I consider amusing, such as American Natural Energy Corp.’s amendment in which the number of authorized common shares was increased from 100-million with a par value of $0.01 to 250-million with a par value of $0.001.

Update, 2011-11-24: See the second section of Security Transaction Taxes and Market Quality for an entertaining account of Par Value as it relates to common stock and trading in New York when it had a securities transaction tax.

eMail Problems!

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

My service provider, Bell Canada, seems to be doing extensive maintenance on their eMail system. Over the past day or so, I have been told on several occasions that access to my eMail is “forbidden” and I have recently been told by a client that an eMail that was sent to me bounced back, on the grounds that my mailbox was full.

So … if you really need to contact me, use the ‘phone! 416-604-4204.

But with any luck my eMail will be fixed soon.

February 21, 2007

Wednesday, February 21st, 2007
Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.10% 4.12% 26,137 17.19 1 -0.0796% 1,044.0
Fixed-Floater 4.81% 3.72% 85,328 8.17 7 -0.1903% 1,042.0
Floater 4.48% -20.50% 55,143 3.34 5 +0.0657% 1,048.3
Op. Retract 4.71% 2.40% 74,002 2.06 18 -0.0911% 1,031.0
Split-Share 5.09% 0.75% 253,022 2.69 14 -0.0561% 1,045.2
Interest Bearing 6.47% 3.53% 60,141 2.36 5 +0.0525% 1,039.5
Perpetual-Premium 5.03% 3.77% 219,626 5.02 51 -0.0350% 1,054.2
Perpetual-Discount 4.52% 4.55% 1,098,440 15.49 11 +0.0220% 1,061.1
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
There were no index-included issues with extraordinary performance today.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
CM.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 100,455 Recent new issue. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.53% based on a bid of $24.94 and a limitMaturity
WN.PR.B OpRet 43,790 Credit watch negative! Scotia crossed 23,300 at $26.05, then Desjardines crossed 20,000 at the same price. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.71% based on a bid of $26.00 and softMaturity 2009-6-30 at $25.00. That’s an interest equivalent of 5.19% at standard equivalency … I note that the Weston bonds, 6.45%/11, are trading 44bp back of Canadas, call it maybe 4.50%.
BMO.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 24,155 Recent new issue. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.51% based on a bid of $25.13 and either a call 2016-3-26 at $25.00, or a limitMaturity, take your pick.
RY.PR.A PerpetualDiscount 23,135 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.47% based on a bid of $24.95 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.D PerpetualPremium 22,700 RBC bought 16,400 from various dealers in six tranches at $25.19-20 (and another 3,700 in three tranches later in the afternoon). Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.54% based on a bid of $25.12 and a limitMaturity.

There were twenty-three other “$25 p.v. equivalent” index-included issues with over 10,000 shares traded today.

HIMIPref Indices : December 1997

Wednesday, February 21st, 2007

All indices were assigned a value of 1000.0 as of December 31, 1993.

HIMI Index Values 1997-12-31
Index Closing Value (Total Return) Issues Mean Credit Quality Median YTW Median DTW Median Daily Trading Mean Current Yield
Ratchet 1,576.3 0 0 0 0 0 0
FixedFloater 1,506.6 9 2.00 4.35% 16.3 289M 5.16%
Floater 1,484.3 5 1.80 4.30% 16.2 105M 4.74%
OpRet 1,296.0 34 1.31 4.71% 4.1 93M 6.24%
SplitShare 1,322.3 2 1.49 5.01% 7.4 374M 5.46%
Interest-Bearing 1,296.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perpetual-Premium 1,233.5 4 1.00 2.73% 1.7 106M 7.54%
Perpetual-Discount 1,159.5 1 1.00 5.49% 14.5 460M 5.52%

Index Constitution, 1997-12-31, Pre-rebalancing

Index Constitution, 1997-12-31, Post-rebalancing

Investment Executive Notices Prefs

Wednesday, February 21st, 2007

There’s a story about preferreds in the Mid-February 2007 Investment Executive, titled A new belle at the investment ball?

I was quoted a bit.

February 20, 2007

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007
Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.09% 4.10% 27,210 17.22 1 +0.0398% 1,044.9
Fixed-Floater 4.80% 3.54% 86,257 8.17 7 -0.2344% 1,044.0
Floater 4.48% -20.31% 55,682 3.35 5 -0.0219% 1,047.6
Op. Retract 4.70% 2.15% 74,116 2.06 18 -0.0035% 1,031.9
Split-Share 5.09% 0.42% 257,600 2.69 14 +0.0871% 1,045.8
Interest Bearing 6.47% 3.29% 59,424 2.35 5 -0.0189% 1,039.0
Perpetual-Premium 5.03% 3.75% 221,519 4.90 51 +0.1008% 1,054.6
Perpetual-Discount 4.53% 4.55% 1,142,956 15.49 11 +0.0914% 1,060.9
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BNA.PR.A SplitShare +1.4853% Well … the issue did, after all, go ex-dividend today … but the price didn’t budge. So the pre-tax bid-YTW went from -4.59% yesterday to -21.46% today, based on a bid of $26.30 and a call 2007-3-22 at $25.75. But who knows? Maybe the issue will survive until its hardMaturity 2010-09-30 at $25.00 to have yielded 4.62% … but why BAM Split would allow an issue paying $1.56 to remain outstanding (OK, so they save $0.25 p.a. on that with the declining call premium. It’s still a lot!) when they’ve just proved they can issue with a $1.0875 pay-out is beyond me.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
SLF.PR.A PerpetualDiscount 172,835 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.30% based on a bid of $25.60 and a call 2014-4-30 at $25.00
CM.PR.I PerpetualPremium 165,024 Nesbitt crossed 156,300 at 25.50. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.48% based on a bid of $25.41 and a call 2016-3-1 at $25.00
CM.PR.H PerpetualPremium 130,975 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.23% based on a bid of $25.99 and a call 2014-4-29 at $25.00
WN.PR.B OpRet 80,065 Desjardins crossed 79,300 at $25.95. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.88% based on a bid of $25.90 and softMaturity 2009-6-30 at $25.00.
CM.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 71,905 Recent new issue. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.53% based on a bid of $24.91 and a limitMaturity

There were twenty other “$25 p.v. equivalent” index-included issues with over 10,000 shares traded today.

HIMIPref™ Indices : November, 1997

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007

All indices were assigned a value of 1000.0 as of December 31, 1993.

HIMI Index Values 1997-11-28
Index Closing Value (Total Return) Issues Mean Credit Quality Median YTW Median DTW Median Daily Trading Mean Current Yield
Ratchet 1,568.9 0 0 0 0 0 0
FixedFloater 1,542.6 8 2.00 3.69% 16.9 548M 5.10%
Floater 1,477.3 5 1.80 3.97% 16.9 129M 4.35%
OpRet 1,327.8 33 1.27 3.98% 4.3 98M 6.06%
SplitShare 1,361.6 2 1.50 4.76% 5.0 79M 5.30%
Interest-Bearing 1,327.8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perpetual-Premium 1,233.7 5 1.00 2.54% 1.8 104M 7.54%
Perpetual-Discount 1,177.9 0 0 0 0 0 0

Index Constitution, 1997-11-28, Pre-rebalancing

Index Constitution, 1997-11-28, Post-rebalancing

ABK.PR.C Declares Dividends

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007

In a press release today, it was announced that:

The Board of Directors of AllBanc Split Corp. (the “Company”) has today declared a capital gains dividend of $0.76 per Class A Preferred Share and a capital gains dividend of $0.66 per Class A Capital Share, payable on March 9, 2007 to holders of record at the close of business on March 8, 2007.

The dividends previously estimated have been adjusted on HIMIPref™ to reflect the announcement.