CCS.PR.C: DBRS Upgrades to Pfd-2(low)

December 18th, 2015

DBRS has announced that it:

has today upgraded the Non-Cumulative Preference Shares rating of Co-operators General Insurance Company (CGIC or the Company) to Pfd-2 (low) from Pfd-3 (high). DBRS has also assigned an Issuer Rating of A (low) and a Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of A (low) to the Company. All trends are Stable. All the rating actions are detailed in the table below. The rating actions taken today follow the publication of DBRS’s new methodology, “Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations” (December 2015) (Global Insurance Methodology).

DBRS’s upgrade of CGIC reflects the evaluation of the Company’s fundamentals using the Global Insurance Methodology, which places greater value on the Co-operators’ sizable controlled distribution model as well as property and casualty (P&C) product diversification. CGIC is the main subsidiary of Co-operators Financial Services Company (CFSL). They both form part of The Co-operators Group Limited (the Group), a co-operative financial services organization with complementary interests in life insurance and investment management. As part of a larger financial services group, CGIC enjoys a strong franchise in the co-operative space and ranks fifth in property & casualty insurance products in Canada with a 5.1% market share based on 2014 direct written premiums. The Company is beginning to benefit from recent management initiatives to reduce costs, support better underwriting results and cultivate deeper customer relationships. CGIC has been improving its customer segmentation and, consequently, its ability to differentiate pricing, which creates a more favourable platform for enhancing its earnings ability. The earnings ability evaluation considers the return on equity performance of the Group at the CFSL level where the earnings from CGIC are partially offset by lower earnings from the associated life subsidiary.

Besides its good franchise strength, the Company has a risk profile that reflects its business mix of home, auto and small business insurance and a conservative bond portfolio invested mainly in government debt. CGIC’s capitalization benefits from its low financial leverage. It has no long-term debt and has low levels of short-term borrowing and preferred shares, yielding a low financial leverage ratio and high fixed-charge coverage ratios. The low leverage is viewed positively as CGIC is owned by a co-operative and is therefore largely dependent on internal capital generation. High combined ratios that are near 100% or higher in recent periods, partly driven by the expense of technology development projects, have affected the overall profitability of the Company. Successful implementation of these projects could strengthen CGIC’s earnings ability.

The Stable trend reflects an excellent capital solvency position and an expectation that earnings will improve modestly. A sustained erosion of CGIC’s market share or a prolonged period of higher combined ratios could place negative pressure on the ratings. Conversely, the identification and effective penetration of new market segments could result in positive ratings pressure.

The new methodology is discussed in the post DBRS Releases and Applies New Insurance Company Methodology.

Co-Operators has only one series of preferred share currently outstanding, CCS.PR.C.

It will be noted that, unusually, this is the operating company issuing preferred shares despite the presence of a holding company, Co-operators Financial Services Limited, which was confirmed at BBB.

MFC: DBRS Downgrades to Pfd-2

December 18th, 2015

DBRS has announced that it:

has today downgraded the long-term ratings of Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC or the Company), including downgrading its Medium-Term Notes rating to “A” from A (high). At the same time, DBRS assigned a Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of AA (low) to The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (Manufacturers Life Insurance) and confirmed its Issuer Rating at AA (low) and its Unsecured Subordinated Debentures rating at A (high). DBRS withdrew the Claims Paying Ability rating of Manufacturers Life Insurance, as it is being replaced by the newly assigned FSR. All trends are Stable. All the rating actions are noted in the table below. The rating actions taken today follow the publication of DBRS’s new methodology, “Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations” (December 2015) (Global Insurance Methodology).

The downgrade of the holding company ratings results from the application of the Global Insurance Methodology, under which there is typically a wider notching differential between holding company and operating company ratings than in prior methodologies. Specifically, MFC’s Issuer Rating is rated two notches below the FSR of its major operating subsidiary, The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company. Among other factors, the two-notch differential reflects the structural subordination of the holding company’s creditors to the operating company’s creditors in an insolvency situation and recognizes the reliance of the Company on the upstreaming of earnings from its operating companies.

In confirming the ratings of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, DBRS evaluated MFC’s fundamentals utilizing the Global Insurance Methodology. In DBRS’s view, the Company has an excellent franchise. Indeed, MFC is one of the top three insurance organizations in Canada, with extensive wealth management and insurance operations in Canada, the United States and various parts of Asia. Helped by its strong distribution, product mix, global brand recognition and an increased emphasis on risk management and innovation, MFC has experienced high growth and profitability in recent years. These characteristics demonstrate the Company’s good risk profile, good liquidity and excellent earnings capacity. As indicated by its leverage ratio of 22.7% and a Minimum Continuing Capital and Surplus Requirement (MCCSR) of 226%, MFC maintains good capitalization and asset quality.

The Stable trend considers the Company’s resilient fundamentals and its ability to adapt to the current challenging operating environment. Negative ratings pressure could arise from earnings volatility, or a deterioration in financial metrics that indicates a weakening in the Company’s franchise strength. Conversely, positive rating pressure could arise from a sustained improvement in the Company’s fixed-charge coverage ratio.

The new methodology is discussed in the post DBRS Releases and Applies New Insurance Company Methodology.

Affected issues are: MFC.PR.B, MFC.PR.C, MFC.PR.F, MFC.PR.G, MFC.PR.H, MFC.PR.I, MFC.PR.J, MFC.PR.K, MFC.PR.L, MFC.PR.M and MFC.PR.N.

FFH: DBRS Affirms at Pfd-3, Changes Trend to Positive

December 18th, 2015

DBRS has announced that it:

has today confirmed Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited’s (Fairfax or the Company) ratings, including its Issuer Rating at BBB, its Senior Unsecured Debt rating at BBB and its Preferred Shares rating at Pfd-3. The trend has been changed to Positive from Stable. The rating of Fairfax (US) Inc.’s Senior Unsecured Notes, guaranteed by Fairfax, has also been confirmed at BBB. The trend has also changed to Positive, in line with Fairfax. At the same time, DBRS assigned a Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of A (low), with a Positive trend, to both Northbridge General Insurance Company (Northbridge) and Federated Insurance Company of Canada (Federated), the Canadian operating subsidiaries of Fairfax. All ratings actions are detailed in the table below. The rating actions taken today follow the publication of DBRS’s new methodology, “Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations” (December 2015) (Global Insurance Methodology).

Under the Global Insurance Methodology, Fairfax’s Issuer Rating has been notched down two notches from the FSR of its operating companies. Among other factors, the notching reflects the structural subordination of the holding company’s creditors to the operating company’s creditors in an insolvency situation, and recognizes the reliance of the holding company on the upstreaming of earnings from its operating companies.

The change in the trend to Positive reflects the progress that Fairfax is making with its franchise and operations. The Company continues to develop its worldwide organization of insurance and reinsurance entities using a multi-brand strategy. The Canadian operations, through the Northbridge and Federated brands, hold a 5% market share of the Canadian commercial property and casualty (P&C) market, while through the Odyssey Re brand, Fairfax is ranked in the top 20 global P&C reinsurance writers. The Company has other brands from its successful acquisition activity that cater to particular risks, for example, workman’s compensation, pet insurance or marine. Fairfax has a strong focus on underwriting and pricing, and a willingness to avoid writing new business when it views market pricing as inadequate. The Company is noted for its expertise in active investment management, often taking controlling shares in portfolio investments, but also has a guiding principle to protect the Company from downside risks through both asset selection and hedging. Reflecting its strong liquidity position, the holding company maintains a liquid investment pool that helps to ensure that it can meet its capital servicing charges and has the mobility to move capital to recapitalize a subsidiary if required.

While Fairfax has good earnings ability, its earnings tend to be more volatile through its underwriting results and its investment portfolio because of market value changes in its bond and equity holdings. To manage its dispersed global operation, the Company maintains a lean head office based on its approach of providing a high degree of autonomy to its business units. However, Fairfax’s good risk profile reflects its centralized risk management function, which uses the risk management functions of each of the business operations to collect and monitor information regarding aggregate and emerging risks. The decentralized structure with specialized and diverse insurance risks is an operational challenge that is managed through an accounting system that provides performance information for numerous risk segments on both a local and aggregate basis.

The Positive trend considers the Company’s improving fundamentals, its recent acquisition of Brit PLC, a global Lloyd’s of London specialty insurer and reinsurer, and its ability to adapt to the current environment. Further positive ratings pressure could emerge if the Company reduces its leverage and improves its fixed charge coverage ratios, enhances its income stability and increases its market shares on a prudent basis. Negative ratings pressure could arise if the Company’s fundamentals weaken because of reduced liquidity levels and inadequate monitoring/oversight of risks.

The new methodology is discussed in the post DBRS Releases and Applies New Insurance Company Methodology.

Affected issues are: FFH.PR.C, FFH.PR.D, FFH.PR.E, FFH.PR.F, FFH.PR.G, FFH.PR.H, FFH.PR.I, FFH.PR.K and FFH.PR.M.

POW: DBRS Downgrades to Pfd-2

December 18th, 2015

DBRS has announced that it:

has today downgraded Power Corporation of Canada’s (POW or the Company) Senior Debt rating to “A” from A (high) and its Preferred Shares ratings to Pfd-2 from Pfd-2 (high) due to the application of the new insurance methodology. All trends are Stable. All the rating actions are detailed in the table below. The rating actions taken today follow the publication of DBRS’s new methodology, “Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations” (December 2015) (Global Insurance Methodology).

The downgrade of POW’s ratings results from the application of the Global Insurance Methodology. POW’s main subsidiary is Power Financial Corporation (PWF), which in turn owns Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO), the greatest contributor to earnings and overall strength of PWF. Hence, the Global Insurance Methodology used to rate GWO is by extension the primary methodology for rating POW.

The ratings for POW are one notch below PWF’s ratings under the holding company criteria due to structural subordination. Additionally, PWF’s rating has been set at the same level as GWO’s Issuer Rating. See the press releases for Power Financial Corporation, “DBRS Downgrades Power Financial Corporation’s Issuer Rating to A (high) from AA (low); Confirms Great West Life Assurance Co at AA”, “DBRS Confirms The Great West Life Assurance Company Ratings at AA; Downgrades Great-West Lifeco’s Debentures to A (high) from AA (low)”, for more information.

POW is an investment holding company controlled by the Desmarais family with PWF as its major holding. Other interests include Square Victoria Communications Group, Power Energy, the Sagard investment funds and other investments. POW benefits from a strong capital position, high liquidity and prudent decision-making with an emphasis on conservativeness and integrated risk management. Negative ratings pressure may arise if the subsidiaries suffer extended declines in profitability or more unlikely, if the Company deviates significantly from its value-based approach to leadership and away from its successful operational track record. POW’s ratings could also be negatively impacted by evidence of governance issues. Conversely, an upgrade of PWF could potentially benefit POW’s rating.

The new methodology is discussed in the post DBRS Releases and Applies New Insurance Company Methodology.

Affected issues are: POW.PR.A, POW.PR.B, POW.PR.C, POW.PR.D, POW.PR.F and POW.PR.G.

GWO: DBRS Downgrades to Pfd-2(high)

December 18th, 2015

DBRS has announced that it:

has today downgraded Great-West Lifeco Inc.’s (GWO or the Company) Debentures to A (high) from AA (low), its Non-Cumulative First Preferred Shares to Pfd-2 (high) from Pfd-1 (low), and has also assigned an Issuer Rating of A (high) to the Company. At the same time, DBRS assigned a Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of AA to GWO’s major operating subsidiaries: The Great-West Life Assurance Company, The Canada Life Assurance Company and London Life Insurance Company. The Great-West Life Assurance Company’s Issuer Rating was confirmed at AA, and its Preferred Shares were confirmed at Pfd-1. The Canada Life Assurance Company’s Subordinated Debentures were confirmed at AA (low). Lastly, DBRS has withdrawn the Claims Paying Ability ratings of the three operating subsidiaries, replacing them with the newly assigned FSRs. All trends are Stable. All rating actions are detailed in the table below. The rating actions taken today follow the publication of DBRS’s new methodology, “Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations” (December 2015) (Global Insurance Methodology).

The downgrade of the holding company ratings results from the application of DBRS’s newly implemented Global Insurance Methodology, which favours a wider notch differential between holding and operating company ratings than in prior methodologies. Specifically, the senior debt of the holding company, GWO, is positioned two notches below the FSR of its major operating subsidiary, The Great-West Life Assurance Company. Among other factors, the notching reflects the structural subordination of the holding company’s creditors to the operating company’s creditors in an insolvency situation, and recognizes the reliance of the Company on the upstreaming of earnings from its operating companies.

In confirming the ratings of the operating subsidiaries, DBRS evaluated GWO’s fundamentals using the Global Insurance Methodology. GWO is the largest insurance company in Canada, with a dominant market position for both individual insurance and group benefits and savings. The Company also has extensive operations in the United States and Europe. The Company has strong financial metrics, including a decreasing financial leverage (debt, hybrids and preferreds to capital) ratio of 26.5% at Q3 2015, a minimum continuing capital and surplus requirement (MCCSR) ratio of 234% and an above-peer return on equity that has been in the mid-teens for the past several years.

The Stable trend considers the Company’s resilient fundamentals and its ability to adapt to the current challenging operating environment. Negative ratings pressure could arise if the Company’s fundamentals weaken because of a reduction in earnings, with a deterioration in fixed-charge coverage ratios. Positive rating pressure could arise if there is a material reduction in financial leverage or improved profitability at Putnam.

The new methodology is discussed in the post DBRS Releases and Applies New Insurance Company Methodology.

Affected issues are: GWO.PR.F, GWO.PR.G, GWO.PR.H, GWO.PR.I, GWO.PR.L, GWO.PR.M, GWO.PR.N, GWO.PR.P, GWO.PR.Q, GWO.PR.R, and GWO.PR.S.

PWF: DBRS Downgrades to Pfd-2(high)

December 18th, 2015

DBRS has announced that it:

DBRS Limited (DBRS) has today downgraded Power Financial Corporation’s (PWF or the Company) Issuer Rating and Senior Debentures to A (high) from AA (low) and its Preferred Shares ratings to Pfd-2 (high) from Pfd-1 (low) due to the application of the new insurance methodology. All trends are Stable. All the rating actions are detailed in the table below. The rating actions taken today follow the publication of DBRS’s new methodology, “Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations” (December 2015) (Global Insurance Methodology).

The downgrade of PWF’s ratings results from the application of the Global Insurance Methodology and the assignment of an Issuer Rating of A (high) to Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO), PWF’s major operating subsidiary. Since PWF’s greatest contributor to earnings and overall strength is GWO, a large insurance organization contributing approximately 75% of YTD 2015 earnings, the primary methodology used to rate GWO is the Global Insurance Methodology, and by extension it is the primary methodology for rating PWF. As a parent holding company, GWO’s Issuer Rating of A (high) is positioned two notches below the Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of Great-West Life Assurance Company, its operating insurance company. Among other factors, the two notch differential reflects the structural subordination of the holding company’s creditors to the operating company’s creditors in an insolvency situation and recognizes the reliance of the Company on the upstreaming of earnings from its operating companies

The diversification and overall strength of PWF’s combined subsidiaries in addition to the assessment of financial strength of the PWF legal entity has resulted in DBRS concluding that the sum of the parts is sufficiently strong for the PWF rating to be at the same level as the GWO rating.

PWF is an investment holding company controlling two major Canadian financial services providers: GWO and IGM Financial Inc. Through a 50/50 partnership with Belgium’s Frère Group, PWF also shares a 55.5% equity interest in Pargesa Holding S.A., a Swiss holding company with indirect interests in a limited number of European-based industrial companies. PWF, in turn, is 65.6% owned by Power Corporation of Canada (POW). Similar to POW, PWF benefits from a strong capital position, high liquidity and prudent decision-making with an emphasis on conservativeness and integrated risk management. PWF’s credit ratings could come under pressure if the operating subsidiaries experience a deterioration in credit quality or an extended period of low profitability that results in declining financial metrics, or eroding market share. Negative ratings pressure may also arise from evidence of governance and control issues. Conversely, the Company may potentially benefit from any upgrades to the ratings of GWO.

The new methodology is discussed in the post DBRS Releases and Applies New Insurance Company Methodology.

Affected issues are: PWF.PR.A, PWF.PR.E, PWF.PR.F, PWF.PR.G, PWF.PR.H, PWF.PR.I, PWF.PR.K, PWF.PR.L, PWF.PR.O, PWF.PR.P, PWF.PR.R, PWF.PR.S and PWF.PR.T.

SLF: DBRS Downgrades to Pfd-2

December 18th, 2015

DBRS has announced that it:

has today downgraded Sun Life Financial Inc.’s (SLF or the Company) Senior Unsecured Debentures to “A” from A (high), its Subordinated Unsecured Debentures to A (low) from “A” and its Preferred Shares to Pfd-2 from Pfd-2 (high). DBRS has also assigned an Issuer Rating of “A” to the Company. At the same time, DBRS assigned a Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of AA (low) to Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (Sun Life Assurance) and confirmed its Issuer Rating at AA (low) and its Subordinated Debt rating at A (high). DBRS withdrew the Claims Paying Ability rating of Sun Life Assurance, replacing it with the newly assigned FSR. All trends are Stable. All the rating actions are detailed in the table below. The rating actions taken today follow the publication of DBRS’s new methodology, “Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations” (December 2015) (Global Insurance Methodology).

The downgrade of the holding company ratings results from the application of the Global Insurance Methodology under which there is typically a wider notch differential between holding company and operating company ratings than in prior methodologies.

The Stable trend considers the Company’s resilient fundamentals and its ability to adapt to the current challenging operating environment. Negative ratings pressure could arise if the Company’s fundamentals weaken, which may include a sustained decline in equity markets or significant deviations of experience from actuarial assumptions. A deterioration in regulatory capital ratios and loss of market share may also negatively affect ratings. Positive rating pressure could arise if the Company experiences solid earnings and growth resulting in increased market share, or displays consistently improved financial metrics and asset quality coupled with income stability.

The new methodology is discussed in the post DBRS Releases and Applies New Insurance Company Methodology.

Affected issues are: SLF.PR.A, SLF.PR.B, SLF.PR.C, SLF.PR.D, SLF.PR.E, SLF.PR.G, SLF.PR.H, SLF.PR.I and SLF.PR.J.

DBRS Releases and Applies New Insurance Company Methodology

December 18th, 2015

DBRS has touted their new insurance company rating methodology:

DBRS Limited (DBRS) has today released its “Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations (December 2015)” after a public request for comment period. The new methodology considers several factors, including the increased complexity of insurance risks and regulation; major shifts and dynamics in competition across the diverse financial services space; regulatory environment evolution, particularly in respect of evolving views on the definitions of capital; and the growing global reach of internationally active insurance companies.

The methodology, which places a high emphasis on the prevailing regulatory and operating environments, is underpinned by the DBRS core rating philosophy of “rating through the cycle.” The unique approach outlined in the new methodology incorporates a transparent approach to the notching between the holding company and operating company ratings, as well as a clear qualitative and quantitative approach to assessing franchise strength, while incorporating other key analytical considerations, including earnings ability, liquidity, risk profile, capitalization and asset quality.

The methodology specifically addresses the rating of insurance holding companies by taking into consideration the unique aspects of these parent companies and the operating groups that they control, considering various characteristics, including their diversified holdings, capital structure and cash flows.

Given an existing FSR at the operating company, the parent holding company would typically be notched down two notches from this FSR to reflect structural subordination under this new methodology. Ratings of a holding company’s debt and preferred shares depend on the FSR at its operating company, which then serves as the anchor point for the rating of the various capital instruments at the operating company and the holding company. Existing insurance company ratings and related ratings of insurance holding companies were revised.

The methodology itself is titled Global Methodology for Rating Life and P&C Insurance Companies and Insurance Organizations:

Impact of Related Methodologies and Criteria – Final Rating and Ratings for Specific Securities

Once DBRS has determined the initial FSR of the insurer, several other methodologies and criteria are employed to determine the final FSR and ratings for specific classes of securities from senior debt to preferred shares. As discussed in these methodologies, the final rating will consider aspects such as the support assessment (or pressure) of applicable sovereign governments and appropriate notching for the holding company, ranking and contingent risk considerations.

Operating Company Ranking of Creditors

This global insurance methodology generates an FSR for the main operating insurance company based on information applicable
to the consolidated group. In jurisdictions where policyholder claims rank above senior and subordinated debt, this claim superiority will be recognized in the notching with reference to the ranking of the various classes of creditors noted below.

General method of ranking (for a standard operating insurance company):
1a. FSR: Credit risk evaluation of the policyholders’ risk of the company’s expected future probability of failing to honour undisputed claims or benefit payments as per the policy contract.
1b. Issuer Rating: The FSR rating will also be the Issuer Rating for the operating insurance company.
2. Senior Debt Rating: FSR minus one notch (if no senior debt will be issued because of regulatory disadvantage and management practice, this placeholder notching for senior debt could be ignored, uplifting the subordinated debt rating, etc.).
3. Sub-Debt Rating: FSR minus two notches.
4. Preferred Shares Rating: FSR minus three notches.

Holding Company Notching

In determining the appropriate rating of holding company debt, DBRS will notch from the FSR of the operating insurance company in accordance with the following general guidelines. While a rating differential between the FSR of the operating insurance company and the rating of the holding company’s senior debt is typically two notches, it can range from zero to four notches or more depending on a number of factors. Such factors include:
• Legal structure and management of the insurance group,
• Diversity of subsidiary operating businesses and their contributions to the strength of the holding company,
• Consistency of dividends from operating businesses as well as the assessment of regulatory upstream dividend constraints and the liquidity of operating companies,
• Stand-alone liquidity of the holding company to meet capital servicing charges,
• Holding company access to funds to pay fixed holding company charges and rollover funding,
• Consolidated financial leverage measures,
• Double leverage ratio (please refer to definitions in the Appendix 2),
• Consolidated fixed-charge coverage ratio,
• Presence of a common regulator for the holding company and operating company, resulting in coordination of regulation and
regulatory action,
• Low solvency ratios in operating subsidiaries, limiting the ability to pay dividends regardless of the regulatory approval process and
• If the operating company’s FSR is rated BBB high or lower, an assessment will be made that may determine a greater than two notch differential for the holding company.

The holding company’s investment in subsidiaries is primarily equity based, which creates a structural subordination for holding company debtholders. DBRS recognizes that this structural subordination will only be realized in the event of the operating company being declared insolvent and, following the creditor adjudication process, the holding company debt investors may find that their claim is treated with the ranking of an equity holder of the operating subsidiary.

By rating the holding company’s senior debt at least two or more notches below the FSR of the main operating company, the senior and subordinated debt of the holding company is always at least one notch lower than the operating company’s senior and subordinated debt. In jurisdictions where operating companies do not typically issue senior debt, the operating company’s subordinated debt may be rated one notch below the FSR. In this case, the holding company’s senior debt will likely be rated one notch below the operating company’s subordinated debt. Maintaining a notching difference between the operating company’s debts and holding company’s debts will communicate to the investor that there is a ranking and recovery difference between similar debt tranches of the holding company and operating company.

This pass-through of debt capital in the form of equity capital can be reflected in the double leverage ratio (for a definition of this ratio, please refer to Appendix 2). Regulatory environments can place limits when and if dividends can be paid to the holding company by the operating company. A restrictive regulatory environment with respect to dividends creates risk that the holding company may have difficulty meeting its capital servicing obligations. This and other factors that assist or hinder the holding company will be evaluated. Generally, the notching of the capital instruments for a holding company with a two-notch differential would have this pattern of notching for the various rankings of security instruments:

1. Parent Holding Company Issuer Rating – FSR minus two notches.
2. Holding Company Senior Debt – FSR minus two notches.
3. Holding Company Sub-Debt – FSR minus three notches.
4. Holding Company Preferred shares – FSR minus four notches.

The extent of the notching can vary with the restrictiveness of the regulatory and supervisory environment in terms of dividends and other payments. For example, as a result of U.S. regulatory dividend restrictions for insurance companies, the issuer rating for U.S. holding companies would typically be rated three notches below the FSR. For non-U.S. insurance holding companies that have significant U.S. insurance operations, the analysis would consider the parent holding company’s ability to access sufficient dividend income from other operations as well as the U.S. insurance subsidiaries.

December 16, 2015

December 17th, 2015

The hot news of the day is the FOMC Statement:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in October suggests that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace. Household spending and business fixed investment have been increasing at solid rates in recent months, and the housing sector has improved further; however, net exports have been soft. A range of recent labor market indicators, including ongoing job gains and declining unemployment, shows further improvement and confirms that underutilization of labor resources has diminished appreciably since early this year. Inflation has continued to run below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective, partly reflecting declines in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports. Market-based measures of inflation compensation remain low; some survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations have edged down.

Overall, taking into account domestic and international developments, the Committee sees the risks to the outlook for both economic activity and the labor market as balanced. Inflation is expected to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects of declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens further. The Committee continues to monitor inflation developments closely.

The Committee judges that there has been considerable improvement in labor market conditions this year, and it is reasonably confident that inflation will rise, over the medium term, to its 2 percent objective. Given the economic outlook, and recognizing the time it takes for policy actions to affect future economic outcomes, the Committee decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 1/4 to 1/2 percent. The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative after this increase, thereby supporting further improvement in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation.

The Committee expects that economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.

There were no dissents. The move was met with cheers:

“Americans should realize that the Fed’s decision today reflects our confidence in the U.S. economy,” Yellen said. “While things may be uneven across regions of the country and different industrial sectors, we see an economy that is on a path of sustainable improvement.”

Equity prices rallied in response, with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index of U.S. stocks rising 1.5 percent to 2,073.07 in New York. Bond prices fell on the prospects of higher short-term interest rates, though yields on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note remained below levels seen last month.

Policy makers forecast that the short-term policy rate will rise to 1.375 percent at the end of 2016, implying four quarter-point increases in the target range next year, based on the median number from 17 officials.

“I do want to emphasize that while we have said gradual, gradual does not mean mechanical — evenly timed, equally sized, interest-rate changes,” she said. “As the outlook evolves, we’ll respond appropriately. I strongly doubt that it will mean equally spaced hikes,” she added.

The Fed will be able to take such an approach because inflation is so far below its 2 percent goal. As measured by the personal consumption expenditure price index, it rose by 0.2 percent in the 12 months through October.

The telecoms are changing:

Shaw Communications Inc. is finally poised to enter the wireless business, with a $1.6-billion deal to buy Toronto startup carrier Wind Mobile Corp.

Calgary-based cable operator Shaw announced the transaction on Wednesday evening, noting that while the deal still requires approval from the federal government and the Competition Bureau, it expects it to close during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 (the first half of the calendar year).

Wind, which operates in urban areas in Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta, has 940,000 subscribers, and Shaw said the small carrier is expected to generate $485-million in revenue and $65-million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) in 2015.

Wind has provided a lower-priced alternative to Canada’s Big Three carriers – Telus, BCE Inc. and Rogers Communications Inc. – and consumers will be wondering whether that will evaporate with this sale.

[Shaw CEO] Mr. [Brad] Shaw said as the wireless company improves its coverage and upgrades to LTE (fourth-generation), “I see pricing somewhat discounted, but probably closer to the incumbents as we go forward, which allows us to increase ARPU [average revenue per user]. But listen, growth is very important to us and that’s going to be a key driver, as well as making sure consumers feel there’s value.”

HSBC Bank Canada, proud issuer of HSB.PR.C and HSB.PR.D, has been confirmed at Pfd-2 by DBRS:

DBRS Limited (DBRS) has today confirmed all the ratings of HSBC Bank Canada (HSBC Canada or the Bank) including the Bank’s Long-Term Deposits and Senior Debt at A (high) and the Short-Term Instruments at R-1 (middle). All trends are Stable. Additionally, DBRS discontinued the rating of HSBC Canada Asset Trust (HaTS HSBC Bank Canada’s innovative Tier 1 capital instruments) following repayment of the final instrument.

Earlier this year, on September 29, 2015, DBRS downgraded the Long-Term Deposits and Senior Debt, and Subordinated Debt ratings of HSBC Canada following the conclusion of a review of government support at HSBC Holdings plc, the indirect parent entity of HSBC Canada. The changes reflect DBRS’s view that developments in European regulation and legislation mean that there is less certainty about the likelihood of timely systemic support. Given HSBC Canada’s position in the global franchise of HSBC Group (the Group), DBRS has assigned an SA1 designation to the bank under “DBRS Criteria: Support Assessments for Banks and Banking Organisations,” which implies strong and predictable support from the Group, should it be required. As a result, HSBC Canada’s rating generally moves in tandem with HSBC Holdings plc’s rating. Accordingly, HSBC Canada’s senior debt rating is notched down by one notch from HSBC Holdings plc’s rating of AA (low).

Some factors that may improve HSBC Canada’s overall credit strength include reductions in geographic and/or sector loan concentrations, or a successful growth of retail wealth management. On the other hand, any significant increase in provisions (particularly related to energy sector lending), evidence of compliance failings or a change in DBRS’s assessment of likely support from the HSBC Group could put negative pressure on the rating assessment.

The trouble nowadays, though, is that when people refer to “lift-off”, I don’t know whether they’re talking about the Fed rate increase or the Canadian preferred share market!

NASA's Orion Spacecraft Launches Unmanned Test Flight
Click for Big

The Canadian preferred share market was on fire again today, with PerpetualDiscounts up 102bp, FixedResets winning 336bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 59bp. The Performance Highlights table is ridiculously long again, of course, with no less than fifteen issues returning more than 5.00% on the day. Volume was again very, very heavy.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.86%, equivalent to 7.62% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield a little over 4.2%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 340bp, down only slightly (and perhaps spuriously) from the 345bp reported December 9

At time of writing the TMXMoney website doesn’t have the Total Return Index Value for TXPL, but I guess it’s about maybe 1,256.41, which would put the index down 3.22% on the month-to-date, but 6.36% above the December 14 low.

TXPR_151216
Click for Big

Similarly, TXPL is somewhere close to 773.32, down 3.68% on the month-to-date but 9.08% above the December 14 low.

TXPL_151216
Click for Big

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

impVol_TRP_151216
Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 18.66 to be $1.45 rich, while TRP.PR.C, resetting 2016-1-30 at +154, is $1.12 cheap at its bid price of 12.06.

impVol_MFC_151216
Click for Big

Most expensive is MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, bid at 21.96 to be 0.64 cheap, while MFC.PR.I, resetting at +286bp on 2017-9-19, is bid at 22.13 to be 0.51 rich.

impVol_BAM_151216
Click for Big

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PR.R, resetting at +230bp on 2016-6-30, bid at 15.20 to be $1.41 cheap. BAM.PF.G, resetting at +284bp on 2020-6-30 is bid at 20.45 and appears to be $1.01 rich.

impVol_FTS_151216
Click for Big

FTS.PR.M, with a spread of +248bp, and bid at 20.53, looks $0.35 expensive and resets 2019-12-1. FTS.PR.G, with a spread of +213bp and resetting 2018-9-1, is bid at 17.42 and is $0.94 cheap.

pairs_FR_151216
Click for Big

Investment-grade pairs predict an average three-month bill yield over the next five-odd years of -1.33%, with one outlier below -2.00%. There are two junk outliers below -2.00% and four above 0.00%. Note the vertical axis of this graph has been changed.

pairs_FF_151216
Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.96 % 6.03 % 33,638 16.60 1 0.3663 % 1,563.8
FixedFloater 7.25 % 6.42 % 35,518 15.72 1 1.9440 % 2,693.1
Floater 4.31 % 4.36 % 84,444 16.72 4 0.5739 % 1,771.4
OpRet 4.87 % 4.28 % 26,297 0.69 1 0.0000 % 2,734.3
SplitShare 4.87 % 5.81 % 82,956 1.87 6 0.0415 % 3,175.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0415 % 2,477.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.85 % 5.91 % 98,476 13.90 7 0.5310 % 2,477.8
Perpetual-Discount 5.78 % 5.86 % 104,697 14.05 33 1.0227 % 2,477.5
FixedReset 5.22 % 4.72 % 265,864 15.31 80 3.3632 % 1,977.0
Deemed-Retractible 5.25 % 5.30 % 135,940 5.31 33 0.5933 % 2,556.1
FloatingReset 2.81 % 4.27 % 68,373 5.67 11 1.9011 % 2,103.5
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
PVS.PR.E SplitShare -1.98 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.82
Bid-YTW : 6.43 %
BAM.PR.K Floater -1.31 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 10.52
Evaluated at bid price : 10.52
Bid-YTW : 4.49 %
BAM.PF.H FixedReset 1.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2020-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.20
Bid-YTW : 4.80 %
CU.PR.I FixedReset 1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 23.13
Evaluated at bid price : 24.90
Bid-YTW : 4.44 %
RY.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 1.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.97
Bid-YTW : 4.80 %
RY.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 1.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.88
Bid-YTW : 4.67 %
MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible 1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.31
Bid-YTW : 7.40 %
IFC.PR.C FixedReset 1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.26
Bid-YTW : 6.91 %
PWF.PR.H Perpetual-Premium 1.11 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 24.43
Evaluated at bid price : 24.67
Bid-YTW : 5.91 %
FTS.PR.K FixedReset 1.11 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.20
Evaluated at bid price : 18.20
Bid-YTW : 4.15 %
SLF.PR.C Deemed-Retractible 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.32
Bid-YTW : 7.31 %
CU.PR.D Perpetual-Discount 1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 21.19
Evaluated at bid price : 21.19
Bid-YTW : 5.84 %
PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Discount 1.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 21.82
Evaluated at bid price : 22.06
Bid-YTW : 5.86 %
POW.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.21 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 23.99
Evaluated at bid price : 24.24
Bid-YTW : 5.87 %
GWO.PR.P Deemed-Retractible 1.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.96
Bid-YTW : 6.01 %
TRP.PR.B FixedReset 1.24 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 11.44
Evaluated at bid price : 11.44
Bid-YTW : 4.51 %
SLF.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 1.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.21
Bid-YTW : 7.38 %
ELF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.27 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 22.06
Evaluated at bid price : 22.35
Bid-YTW : 6.03 %
TRP.PR.E FixedReset 1.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.66
Evaluated at bid price : 18.66
Bid-YTW : 4.54 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 1.31 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 10.84
Evaluated at bid price : 10.84
Bid-YTW : 4.36 %
BIP.PR.A FixedReset 1.32 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.22
Evaluated at bid price : 19.22
Bid-YTW : 5.70 %
PWF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.35 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 22.29
Evaluated at bid price : 22.56
Bid-YTW : 5.90 %
PVS.PR.D SplitShare 1.38 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2021-10-08
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.06
Bid-YTW : 7.06 %
IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 1.38 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.55
Bid-YTW : 7.32 %
BAM.PR.T FixedReset 1.40 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 15.95
Evaluated at bid price : 15.95
Bid-YTW : 4.96 %
FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Discount 1.41 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 21.55
Evaluated at bid price : 21.55
Bid-YTW : 5.56 %
TD.PR.T FloatingReset 1.51 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.25
Bid-YTW : 4.07 %
CU.PR.E Perpetual-Discount 1.53 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 21.25
Evaluated at bid price : 21.25
Bid-YTW : 5.82 %
ELF.PR.G Perpetual-Discount 1.54 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 20.46
Evaluated at bid price : 20.46
Bid-YTW : 5.91 %
CU.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.55 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.70
Evaluated at bid price : 19.70
Bid-YTW : 5.77 %
PWF.PR.E Perpetual-Discount 1.55 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 23.33
Evaluated at bid price : 23.61
Bid-YTW : 5.90 %
MFC.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 1.56 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.88
Bid-YTW : 7.18 %
CM.PR.Q FixedReset 1.57 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.40
Evaluated at bid price : 19.40
Bid-YTW : 4.64 %
TD.PF.A FixedReset 1.57 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.07
Evaluated at bid price : 18.07
Bid-YTW : 4.46 %
CU.PR.H Perpetual-Discount 1.58 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 22.15
Evaluated at bid price : 22.50
Bid-YTW : 5.87 %
BIP.PR.B FixedReset 1.60 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 22.20
Evaluated at bid price : 22.87
Bid-YTW : 6.03 %
PWF.PR.K Perpetual-Discount 1.64 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 21.42
Evaluated at bid price : 21.68
Bid-YTW : 5.78 %
CM.PR.P FixedReset 1.67 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.03
Evaluated at bid price : 17.03
Bid-YTW : 4.72 %
BAM.PR.R FixedReset 1.67 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 15.20
Evaluated at bid price : 15.20
Bid-YTW : 5.11 %
TRP.PR.H FloatingReset 1.71 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 10.10
Evaluated at bid price : 10.10
Bid-YTW : 4.25 %
ENB.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.72 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 22.22
Evaluated at bid price : 22.50
Bid-YTW : 6.16 %
TD.PR.Z FloatingReset 1.75 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.15
Bid-YTW : 4.23 %
TRP.PR.D FixedReset 1.76 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.88
Evaluated at bid price : 17.88
Bid-YTW : 4.67 %
VNR.PR.A FixedReset 1.82 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.00
Bid-YTW : 4.88 %
BAM.PR.Z FixedReset 1.85 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.25
Evaluated at bid price : 19.25
Bid-YTW : 4.99 %
SLF.PR.J FloatingReset 1.87 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 13.05
Bid-YTW : 9.93 %
BAM.PR.C Floater 1.90 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 10.70
Evaluated at bid price : 10.70
Bid-YTW : 4.41 %
RY.PR.I FixedReset 1.91 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.00
Bid-YTW : 3.93 %
CU.PR.G Perpetual-Discount 1.91 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.70
Evaluated at bid price : 19.70
Bid-YTW : 5.77 %
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater 1.94 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 13.11
Bid-YTW : 6.42 %
CIU.PR.C FixedReset 2.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 13.60
Evaluated at bid price : 13.60
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
BNS.PR.R FixedReset 2.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.33
Bid-YTW : 3.87 %
TD.PF.B FixedReset 2.18 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.83
Evaluated at bid price : 17.83
Bid-YTW : 4.51 %
BNS.PR.C FloatingReset 2.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.00
Bid-YTW : 4.57 %
PWF.PR.T FixedReset 2.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 21.93
Evaluated at bid price : 22.25
Bid-YTW : 3.71 %
BNS.PR.B FloatingReset 2.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.87
Bid-YTW : 4.48 %
BNS.PR.D FloatingReset 2.50 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 18.45
Bid-YTW : 6.73 %
NA.PR.Q FixedReset 2.54 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.62
Bid-YTW : 3.74 %
W.PR.J Perpetual-Discount 2.56 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 22.93
Evaluated at bid price : 23.21
Bid-YTW : 6.14 %
W.PR.H Perpetual-Discount 2.59 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 22.71
Evaluated at bid price : 23.00
Bid-YTW : 6.08 %
BNS.PR.Z FixedReset 2.81 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.37
Bid-YTW : 6.86 %
MFC.PR.H FixedReset 2.86 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.96
Bid-YTW : 5.74 %
RY.PR.M FixedReset 2.89 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.86
Evaluated at bid price : 18.86
Bid-YTW : 4.59 %
BNS.PR.Y FixedReset 2.89 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.55
Bid-YTW : 6.19 %
TRP.PR.G FixedReset 2.90 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.86
Evaluated at bid price : 19.86
Bid-YTW : 4.74 %
BMO.PR.S FixedReset 2.91 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.42
Evaluated at bid price : 18.42
Bid-YTW : 4.45 %
MFC.PR.F FixedReset 2.94 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 14.36
Bid-YTW : 9.30 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 3.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 12.06
Evaluated at bid price : 12.06
Bid-YTW : 4.82 %
NA.PR.W FixedReset 3.09 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.02
Evaluated at bid price : 17.02
Bid-YTW : 4.76 %
TD.PR.S FixedReset 3.12 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.80
Bid-YTW : 3.79 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 3.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 14.65
Evaluated at bid price : 14.65
Bid-YTW : 3.90 %
MFC.PR.J FixedReset 3.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.65
Bid-YTW : 6.07 %
HSE.PR.E FixedReset 3.26 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.00
Bid-YTW : 5.77 %
NA.PR.S FixedReset 3.39 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.68
Evaluated at bid price : 17.68
Bid-YTW : 4.76 %
BMO.PR.W FixedReset 3.41 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.60
Evaluated at bid price : 17.60
Bid-YTW : 4.51 %
BMO.PR.R FloatingReset 3.41 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.75
Bid-YTW : 3.72 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset 3.45 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 15.00
Bid-YTW : 8.67 %
BMO.PR.M FixedReset 3.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.60
Bid-YTW : 3.18 %
RY.PR.J FixedReset 3.50 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.20
Evaluated at bid price : 19.20
Bid-YTW : 4.62 %
BAM.PF.B FixedReset 3.51 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.29
Evaluated at bid price : 18.29
Bid-YTW : 4.84 %
TD.PF.C FixedReset 3.57 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.01
Evaluated at bid price : 18.01
Bid-YTW : 4.45 %
TD.PF.D FixedReset 3.68 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.99
Evaluated at bid price : 19.99
Bid-YTW : 4.50 %
TD.PF.E FixedReset 3.74 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 20.50
Evaluated at bid price : 20.50
Bid-YTW : 4.50 %
BMO.PR.T FixedReset 3.75 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.71
Evaluated at bid price : 17.71
Bid-YTW : 4.51 %
IFC.PR.A FixedReset 3.84 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 16.24
Bid-YTW : 8.54 %
MFC.PR.L FixedReset 3.84 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.18
Bid-YTW : 6.84 %
BNS.PR.P FixedReset 3.87 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.68
Bid-YTW : 3.34 %
IAG.PR.G FixedReset 3.91 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.25
Bid-YTW : 5.88 %
FTS.PR.I FloatingReset 3.96 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 11.80
Evaluated at bid price : 11.80
Bid-YTW : 4.03 %
RY.PR.H FixedReset 3.99 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.25
Evaluated at bid price : 18.25
Bid-YTW : 4.40 %
RY.PR.Z FixedReset 4.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.21
Evaluated at bid price : 18.21
Bid-YTW : 4.36 %
CM.PR.O FixedReset 4.07 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.91
Evaluated at bid price : 17.91
Bid-YTW : 4.59 %
MFC.PR.G FixedReset 4.09 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.36
Bid-YTW : 5.84 %
HSE.PR.C FixedReset 4.18 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.71
Evaluated at bid price : 17.71
Bid-YTW : 5.71 %
BMO.PR.Q FixedReset 4.37 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.54
Bid-YTW : 5.66 %
MFC.PR.K FixedReset 4.38 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.05
Bid-YTW : 6.83 %
BNS.PR.Q FixedReset 4.43 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.06
Bid-YTW : 3.81 %
FTS.PR.M FixedReset 4.64 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 20.53
Evaluated at bid price : 20.53
Bid-YTW : 4.18 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 4.67 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 15.70
Evaluated at bid price : 15.70
Bid-YTW : 4.47 %
HSE.PR.G FixedReset 4.68 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.00
Bid-YTW : 5.76 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset 5.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 13.76
Bid-YTW : 9.56 %
CU.PR.C FixedReset 5.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.92
Evaluated at bid price : 18.92
Bid-YTW : 4.28 %
MFC.PR.N FixedReset 5.15 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.82
Bid-YTW : 6.51 %
MFC.PR.I FixedReset 5.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.13
Bid-YTW : 5.41 %
FTS.PR.G FixedReset 5.58 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 17.42
Evaluated at bid price : 17.42
Bid-YTW : 4.37 %
MFC.PR.M FixedReset 5.60 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.80
Bid-YTW : 6.59 %
SLF.PR.I FixedReset 5.71 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.35
Bid-YTW : 6.28 %
TD.PR.Y FixedReset 5.82 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.37
Bid-YTW : 3.54 %
BAM.PF.A FixedReset 6.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.67
Evaluated at bid price : 19.67
Bid-YTW : 4.82 %
BAM.PF.G FixedReset 6.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 20.45
Evaluated at bid price : 20.45
Bid-YTW : 4.67 %
BAM.PF.F FixedReset 6.63 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 20.26
Evaluated at bid price : 20.26
Bid-YTW : 4.69 %
SLF.PR.H FixedReset 6.99 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 17.60
Bid-YTW : 7.56 %
BAM.PR.X FixedReset 7.63 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 14.38
Evaluated at bid price : 14.38
Bid-YTW : 4.73 %
BAM.PF.E FixedReset 7.65 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 18.71
Evaluated at bid price : 18.71
Bid-YTW : 4.76 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset 9.92 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 14.30
Evaluated at bid price : 14.30
Bid-YTW : 4.17 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
RY.PR.Q FixedReset 1,558,368 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 23.17
Evaluated at bid price : 25.10
Bid-YTW : 5.25 %
IFC.PR.A FixedReset 135,504 Desjardins crossed blocks of 39,600 and 58,100, both at 16.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2025-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 16.24
Bid-YTW : 8.54 %
W.PR.K FixedReset 102,801 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 22.89
Evaluated at bid price : 24.28
Bid-YTW : 5.36 %
RY.PR.W Perpetual-Discount 92,464 Nesbitt crossed 75,000 at 21.87.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 21.69
Evaluated at bid price : 21.94
Bid-YTW : 5.63 %
HSE.PR.G FixedReset 87,537 Scotia crossed 65,600 at 18.72.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.00
Bid-YTW : 5.76 %
RY.PR.N Perpetual-Discount 86,776 Nesbitt crossed 75,000 at 22.05.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 21.79
Evaluated at bid price : 22.11
Bid-YTW : 5.58 %
There were 93 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.E Ratchet Quote: 13.70 – 15.50
Spot Rate : 1.8000
Average : 1.3113

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 13.70
Bid-YTW : 6.03 %

TD.PR.T FloatingReset Quote: 22.25 – 23.35
Spot Rate : 1.1000
Average : 0.6731

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.25
Bid-YTW : 4.07 %

PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 11.75 – 12.75
Spot Rate : 1.0000
Average : 0.6683

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 11.75
Evaluated at bid price : 11.75
Bid-YTW : 4.05 %

IGM.PR.B Perpetual-Premium Quote: 24.99 – 25.74
Spot Rate : 0.7500
Average : 0.4456

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 24.70
Evaluated at bid price : 24.99
Bid-YTW : 5.98 %

TD.PR.Z FloatingReset Quote: 22.15 – 22.97
Spot Rate : 0.8200
Average : 0.5641

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.15
Bid-YTW : 4.23 %

VNR.PR.A FixedReset Quote: 19.00 – 19.66
Spot Rate : 0.6600
Average : 0.4336

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 19.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.00
Bid-YTW : 4.88 %

RY.PR.Q Firm On High Volume

December 16th, 2015

Royal Bank of Canada has announced:

it has closed its domestic public offering of Non-Cumulative, 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares Series BK. Royal Bank of Canada issued 27 million Preferred Shares Series BK at a price of $25 per share to raise gross proceeds of $675 million.

The offering was underwritten by a syndicate led by RBC Capital Markets. The Preferred Shares Series BK will commence trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange today under the ticker symbol RY.PR.Q.

The bank has granted the underwriters’ an option, exercisable in whole or in part, to purchase up to an additional 2 million Preferred Shares Series BK at the same offering price. The underwriters have 30 days from the closing of the preferred share offering to exercise the option.

The Preferred Shares Series BK were issued under a prospectus supplement dated December 10, 2015 to the bank’s short form base shelf prospectus dated December 20, 2013.

RY.PR.Q is a FixedReset 5.50%+453, announced December 8. It will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and has been assigned to the FixedReset subindex.

The issue traded 1,558,368 shares today (consolidated exchanges) in a range of 24.95-30 before closing at 25.10-20, 4×15. Vital statistics are:

RY.PR.Q FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-12-16
Maturity Price : 23.17
Evaluated at bid price : 25.10
Bid-YTW : 5.25 %

Implied Volatility analysis must be interpreted with caution, as the fact that RY.PR.Q has such a greatly different Issue Reset Spread from the other NVCC issues (RY.PR.Z, RY.PR.H, RY.PR.J and RY.PR.M) gives it a disproportionate influence over the calculated overall slope of the relationship curve. Be that as it may, the calculation results in Implied Volatility consistent with that of other series of issues:

impVol_RY_151216
Click for Big