Archive for January, 2013

GBA.PR.A Defaults on Redemption

Saturday, January 12th, 2013

Missed this when it came out, but better late than never!

GlobalBanc Advantaged 8 Split Corp. has announced:

that the Company will terminate on December 17, 2012 (the “Final Redemption Date”) in accordance with its articles.

Until the Final Redemption Date, the Company will continue to pursue its investment strategy by providing exposure, through the use of a forward agreement, to a portfolio of eight international banks. The forward agreement will be settled on the Final Redemption Date in connection with the termination of the Fund.

The Class A Shares and the Preferred Shares will be redeemed by the Company on the Final Redemption Date in accordance with the redemption provisions of the shares. Pursuant to these provisions, the Preferred Shares will be redeemed at a price per share equal to the lesser of $10.00, plus any accrued and unpaid distributions on a Preferred Share and the net asset value (the “NAV”) per Preferred Share as at the Final Redemption Date. The Class A Shares will be redeemed at a price for every Class A Share equal to the amount, if any, by which the NAV per Unit, being one Class A Share and one Preferred Share, exceeds $10.00 and any accrued and unpaid distributions on a Preferred Share as at the Redemption Date. If the NAV per Unit is less than or equal to $10.00 and any accrued and unpaid distributions on a Preferred Share, the Class A Shares will have no value on redemption. As at November 16, 2012, the Company’s NAV per Unit was $4.39.

All redemption payments (if any) are expected to be made on or about December 28, 2012. It is expected that the Class A Shares and the Preferred Shares will be delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange at the close of trading on December 17, 2012.

According to the company’s still operational website, the NAV on December 17 was $4.61, so there was a significant loss from the $10.00 par value.

GBA.PR.A was last mentioned on PrefBlog when the DBRS rating was discontinued in 2009. GBA.PR.A was not tracked by HIMIPref™.

January PrefLetter Now In Preparation!

Friday, January 11th, 2013

The markets have closed and the December edition of PrefLetter is now being prepared.

PrefLetter is the monthly newsletter recommending individual issues of preferred shares to subscribers. There is at least one recommendation from every major type of preferred share with investment-grade constituents. The recommendations are taylored for “buy-and-hold” investors.

The January edition will contain an appendix showing all issues tracked by HIMIPref™, their vital statistics and the 2012 calender year performance. There may be more, but at this point I’m not sure …

Those taking an annual subscription to PrefLetter receive a discount on viewing of my seminars.

PrefLetter is now available to all residents of Canada.

The January issue will be eMailed to clients and available for single-issue purchase with immediate delivery prior to the opening bell on Monday. I will write another post when the new issue has been uploaded to the server … so watch this space carefully if you intend to order “Next Issue” or “Previous Issue”! Until then, the “Next Issue” is the January issue.

January 12, 2013

Friday, January 11th, 2013

Here’s another fascinating unintended consequence:

China’s one-child policy has produced adults that tend to have personality traits unsuited for starting businesses or managing companies, according to a study that adds to economic concerns surrounding the rule.

Using surveys of 421 men and women in Beijing and testing their skills in economic games, researchers in Australia found those born after the 1979 policy were more pessimistic, nervous, less conscientious, less competitive and more risk averse. They also found them to be 23 percent less prone to choose an occupation that entails business risk, such as becoming a stockbroker, entrepreneur or private firm manager.

Of course, criticizing the government is a form of risk – especially in China! – so perhaps the consequence was actually intended!

Penson Worldwide has filed for bankruptcy:

Penson Worldwide Inc. (PNSN), a provider of financial clearing services and related operational and technology products, filed for bankruptcy in Delaware with a plan to liquidate its business.

The Plano, Texas-based company listed both assets and debt of $100 million to $500 million in Chapter 11 documents filed today in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware. Chapter 11 is the section of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code used by companies to reorganize. In 2011, Penson had revenue of $217.3 million, court papers show.

“Average daily trading volume in equities fell by 5 percent in 2010 and 8 percent in 2011, and short selling continued to fall in each of the years from 2009 through 2011,” Bryce B. Engel, chief operating officer of Penson Worldwide, said in court papers.

The fall of Penson had implications for Northern Securities’ retail operations as discussed on December 14:

A subsidiary of Northern Financial Corp. is assigning client accounts to two unnamed brokerage firms under a consent order with IIROC.

The move by the subsidiary, Northern Investment Securities, will see investment advisers responsible for the accounts transferred to the new firms as well, Northern said in a release Monday.

The order was issued as a result of NSI being unable to obtain an alternative carrying broker or other alternative arrangement to replace Penson Financial Services Canada Inc., which is discontinuing its carrying broker business as of Dec. 31.

During a question-and-answer session at the KPMG 21st Annual Insurance Issues Conference, Julie Dickson of OSFI made an oblique defence of the 2008 Manulife Rule Change:

Well, in terms of capital, it’s a reality because all risk-based capital rules are, to some extent, pro-cyclical. And when risk goes up, required capital goes up. So it is part and parcel of the pro-cyclicality phenomenon. 2008 I think was a good example, where we noticed that capital was spiking. It’s OK for capital to rise as you enter a recession, but it was spiking with the decline in equity markets. And when we looked at how the rules worked, we realized that that was inappropriate because the formulas were requiring a lot of extra capital for obligations which were many, many years off. And that was felt to be, too risk sensitive. We didn’t think it appropriately reflected the risk, and made a change.

Bombardier – proud issuer of BBD.PR.B, BBD.PR.C and BBD.PR.D – has issued ten year notes at 6.125%.

Meanwhile, I see that HSBC Bank Canada – proud issuer of HSB.PR.C, HSB.PR.D and HSB.PR.E – has issued eight year deposit notes at 2.938%.

It was another mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums gaining 2bp, FixedResets up 15bp and DeemedRetractibles off 6bp. Volatility was low. Volume was well above average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0797 % 2,496.0
FixedFloater 4.29 % 3.60 % 29,735 18.19 1 0.1678 % 3,791.9
Floater 2.79 % 3.01 % 60,278 19.71 4 0.0797 % 2,695.1
OpRet 4.62 % -1.46 % 51,117 0.39 4 -0.1143 % 2,598.7
SplitShare 4.60 % 4.57 % 43,627 4.33 2 0.0000 % 2,893.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1143 % 2,376.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.25 % -1.87 % 74,507 0.14 30 0.0181 % 2,344.3
Perpetual-Discount 4.83 % 4.86 % 133,057 15.72 4 -0.1414 % 2,656.8
FixedReset 4.92 % 2.90 % 208,516 3.61 78 0.1459 % 2,476.1
Deemed-Retractible 4.88 % 0.12 % 114,509 0.30 46 -0.0563 % 2,434.4
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
IFC.PR.C FixedReset -1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.35
Bid-YTW : 2.71 %
SLF.PR.I FixedReset 1.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.25
Bid-YTW : 2.96 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
GWO.PR.H Deemed-Retractible 233,756 Nesbitt crossed 225,400 at 25.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.24
Bid-YTW : 4.39 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 210,235 Nesbitt crossed 171,900 at 17.50; Desjardins crossed 26,200 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-11
Maturity Price : 17.50
Evaluated at bid price : 17.50
Bid-YTW : 3.01 %
MFC.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 191,000 RBC crossed 10,000, sold 16,400 to anonymous and sold 10,000 to Desjardins, all at 25.00. Desjardins crossed 100,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 4.72 %
RY.PR.R FixedReset 164,272 TD crossed 160,200 at 26.45.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.36
Bid-YTW : 2.07 %
MFC.PR.D FixedReset 125,921 RBC crossed 120,000 at 26.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.41
Bid-YTW : 2.90 %
CM.PR.L FixedReset 118,781 RBC crossed 29,100 at 26.45; National crossed blocks of 24,700 and 49,400 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.45
Bid-YTW : 1.72 %
BNS.PR.P FixedReset 111,100 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 25.05.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.10
Bid-YTW : 2.58 %
There were 41 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.60 – 25.94
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2254

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.60
Bid-YTW : 4.12 %

BAM.PR.J OpRet Quote: 26.75 – 27.09
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2280

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-31
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.75
Bid-YTW : 2.90 %

GWO.PR.R Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.52 – 25.74
Spot Rate : 0.2200
Average : 0.1306

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.52
Bid-YTW : 4.56 %

GWO.PR.N FixedReset Quote: 22.96 – 23.55
Spot Rate : 0.5900
Average : 0.5008

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.96
Bid-YTW : 4.20 %

MFC.PR.D FixedReset Quote: 26.41 – 26.65
Spot Rate : 0.2400
Average : 0.1624

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.41
Bid-YTW : 2.90 %

BNS.PR.Q FixedReset Quote: 25.01 – 25.22
Spot Rate : 0.2100
Average : 0.1334

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.01
Bid-YTW : 3.32 %

TXPR & TXPL: Constituent Changes

Friday, January 11th, 2013

Standard & Poor’s has announced:

S&P Dow Jones Indices Canadian Index Operations announces the following index changes as a result of the quarterly S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index and S&P/TSX Venture Select Index Reviews. These changes will be effective at the open on Monday, January 21, 2013

S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index


ADDITIONS

Symbol Issue Name

CUSIP

AQN.PR.A Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. Series ‘A’ Preferred 015857 30 3
BCE.PR.B BCE Inc. 1st Preferred Series ‘AB’ 05534B 69 5
BAM.PF.C Brookfield Asset Management Inc. Class ‘A’ Preferred Series 36 112585 59 1
BRF.PR.C Brookfield Renewable Power Preferred Equity Inc. Class ‘A’ Series 3 11283Q 40 4
CPX.PR.C Capital Power Corporation Series ‘3’ Preferred 14042M 50 8
CCS.PR.C Co-Operators General Insurance Co. Class ‘E’ Preferred Series ‘C’ 189906 40 7
ENB.PR.T Enbridge Inc. Preferred Series ‘R’ 29250N 73 3
FTS.PR.G Fortis Inc. 5-Year Reset Preferred Series ‘G’ 349553 83 4
FTS.PR.J Fortis Inc. 5-Year Reset Preferred Series ‘J’ 349553 79 2
GWO.PR.R Great-West Lifeco Inc. 4.80% 1st Preferred Series ‘R’ 39138C 75 9
LB.PR.F Laurentian Bank of Canada Class ‘A’ Preferred Series 11 51925D 84 1
MFC.PR.J Manulife Financial Corp. Non-Cumulative Class 1 Preferred Series ’11’ 56501R 76 7
NA.PR.Q National Bank of Canada 5-Year Reset 1st Preferred Series ’28’ 633067 33 5


DELETIONS

Symbol Issue Name

CUSIP

DC.PR.A Dundee Corporation 5.00% Preferred Series ‘1’ 264901 60 4
NA.PR.L National Bank of Canada 1st Preferred Series ’16’ 633067 51 7

S&P/TSX Preferred Share Laddered Index


ADDITIONS

Symbol

Issue Name

CUSIP

AQN.PR.A Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. Series ‘A’ Preferred 015857 30 3
BPO.PR.T BROOKFIELD OFFICE PROP INC. CL AAA PR SER ‘T’ 112900 76 6
CPX.PR.A CAPITAL POWER CORPORATION SERIES ‘1’ PR 14042M 30 0
CPX.PR.C CAPITAL POWER CORPORATION SERIES ‘3’ PR 14042M 50 8
CWB.PR.A CANADIAN WESTERN BANK 5-YR RESET PR SER ‘3’ 136765 10 4
ENB.PR.D ENBRIDGE INC. PR SER ‘D’ 29250N 88 1
ENB.PR.F ENBRIDGE INC. PR SER ‘F’ 29250N 86 5
ENB.PR.H ENBRIDGE INC. PR SER ‘H’ 29250N 84 0
ENB.PR.N ENBRIDGE INC. PR SER ‘N’ 29250N 77 4
LB.PR.F LAURENTIAN BANK OF CANADA PR ‘A’ SERIES 11 51925D 84 1
MFC.PR.J MANULIFE FINANCIAL CORP NN-CM CL 1 PR SER 11 56501R 76 7
NA.PR.Q NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA 5-YR 1ST PR SER ’28’ 633067 33 5
RY.PR.I ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1ST PR NON-CUM SER ‘AJ’ 78010A 41 6

DELETIONS

Symbol

Issue Name

CUSIP

DC.PR.A Dundee Corporation 5.00% Preferred Series ‘1’ 264901 60 4

TXPL & TXPR: Methodology Change

Friday, January 11th, 2013

Standard and Poor’s has announced:

S&P Dow Jones Canadian Index Services today announces that it has made a policy change to the treatment of partial calls in Preferred Share Indices. Effective immediately, S&P Dow Jones Indices will recognize all partial preferred share calls for redemption in preferred share indices. On the redemption date of the partial call, S&P Dow Jones Indices will reduce the shares outstanding of the partially called security by the amount of shares called by the issuer. In addition, S&P Dow Jones Indices will apply a price adjustment to the partially called security. The adjusted price of the partially called security will be calculated as the redemption price plus any accrued interest due to investors.

S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index
S&P/TSX North American Preferred Share Index
S&P/TSX Preferred Share Laddered Index

The methodology documents located on the S&P Dow Jones Indices web site for each index will be updated in the coming days to reflect these changes.

January 10, 2013

Friday, January 11th, 2013

Work sharing is becoming more common in the US:

Instead of dismissal notices, employees get a shortened work week, with unemployment benefits partially compensating for lost wages. Popularly known as work sharing, the program holds out the promise of fewer layoffs and less painful economic downturns.

While work share can be useful, policymakers and businesses need to proceed with caution, said Douglas Holmes, president of UWC-Strategic Services on Unemployment & Workers’ Compensation, a Washington-based business group that lobbies on unemployment insurance issues. The programs could drain already stressed unemployment insurance funds and, if used inappropriately, could delay inevitable economic disruptions, he said.

One reason Blue Crown cites for the drop in orders, for example, is that more dentists are sending work to China.

“If an individual continues to do the same job because this policy permits them to, when they would be better off spending time improving their skills doing the next job, that’s a factor that has to be taken into consideration,” Holmes said. “That turns the program from being a temporary measure to address a fluctuation in demand into one that becomes a long- term wage subsidy.”

At Blue Crown, where the least-experienced dental technician makes $17.50 an hour, orders still haven’t bounced back and co-owner Roberts is applying for her third year of work share.

Liquidity is becoming more important in US corporate bond pricing:

Investors’ preference for the most- liquid corporate debt is running higher than any time since the credit crisis, a signal they’re preparing for the four-year rally to end.

The expense incurred by credit traders to complete bond transactions was the lowest last year relative to costs implied by the market’s average bid-ask spread since 2009, according to Barclays Plc. The shift, a sign that buyers are favoring securities that are easiest to trade, has helped financial bonds beat industrial debt by the biggest margin on record, Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data show.

Buyers are seeking flexibility as a 6 percent increase in trading volumes fails to keep up with a 13 percent rise in the size of the dollar-denominated market, data from Bloomberg and Bank of America Merrill Lynch show.

The average daily volume of bonds changing hands last year accounted for 0.29 percent of outstanding debt, the lowest proportion since at least 2005, according to data compiled by Bloomberg and Trace.

The 21 primary dealers with the Federal Reserve, which traditionally used their own money to facilitate trading, have reduced their corporate-bond inventories 76 percent since October 2007 to $57.49 billion, Bloomberg data show.

US housing horror stories never seem to end:

Six years in, thousands of homeowners are finding themselves legally liable for houses they didn’t know they still owned after banks decided it wasn’t worth their while to complete foreclosures on them. With impunity, banks have been walking away from foreclosures much the way some homeowners walked away from their mortgages when the housing market first crashed.

“The banks are just deciding not to foreclose, even though the homeowners never caught up with their payments,” says Daren Blomquist, vice-president at RealtyTrac, a real-estate information company in Irvine, California.

FTN.PR.A was confirmed at Pfd-4(high) by DBRS:

Over the past year, the performance of the Portfolio experienced some volatility, with the month-end NAV of the Company fluctuating between $18.07 and $19.02 per unit. The current dividend coverage ratio is around 0.66, but the Company has also written covered call options in order to generate additional income for distributions. The rating of Pfd-4 (high) is sufficient based on the current level of downside protection available to the Preferred Shares. As a result, the rating has been confirmed at Pfd-4 (high).

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums up 8bp, FixedResets off 1bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 3bp. Volatility was low. Volume was significantly above average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.3599 % 2,494.0
FixedFloater 4.25 % 3.62 % 29,582 18.00 1 0.0000 % 3,785.6
Floater 2.79 % 3.01 % 55,807 19.71 4 0.3599 % 2,692.9
OpRet 4.62 % -4.82 % 51,810 0.39 4 0.0953 % 2,601.7
SplitShare 4.60 % 4.57 % 44,130 4.34 2 0.0200 % 2,893.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0953 % 2,379.0
Perpetual-Premium 5.26 % 0.45 % 75,396 0.75 30 0.0769 % 2,343.9
Perpetual-Discount 4.82 % 4.83 % 132,628 15.79 4 -0.1211 % 2,660.6
FixedReset 4.92 % 2.95 % 209,779 3.61 78 -0.0099 % 2,472.4
Deemed-Retractible 4.87 % -0.72 % 111,368 0.30 46 0.0345 % 2,435.7
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
GWO.PR.N FixedReset -1.63 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.96
Bid-YTW : 4.20 %
TRI.PR.B Floater 1.47 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-10
Maturity Price : 22.55
Evaluated at bid price : 22.80
Bid-YTW : 2.28 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
BMO.PR.P FixedReset 205,027 RBC crossed blocks of 150,000 and 40,000, both at 27.11.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.11
Bid-YTW : 1.68 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 172,354 RBC crossed blocks of 88,000 shares, 39,079 and 14,660, all at 25.65, then sold 10,000 to anonymous at 25.67.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.67
Bid-YTW : 3.27 %
CM.PR.L FixedReset 167,734 RBC crossed 100,000 at 26.45; National crossed 61,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.38
Bid-YTW : 1.92 %
TRP.PR.B FixedReset 136,912 Nesbitt crossed blocks of 59,840 and 48,472, both at 24.45.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-10
Maturity Price : 23.26
Evaluated at bid price : 24.43
Bid-YTW : 2.87 %
MFC.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 95,920 RBC crossed blocks of 26,265 and 37,219, both at 25.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.95
Bid-YTW : 4.74 %
BMO.PR.H Deemed-Retractible 91,597 National crossed 18,700 at 25.45; TD crossed 70,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.39
Bid-YTW : -1.75 %
There were 38 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.K Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.36 – 26.00
Spot Rate : 0.6400
Average : 0.3766

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.36
Bid-YTW : 3.98 %

GWO.PR.N FixedReset Quote: 22.96 – 23.55
Spot Rate : 0.5900
Average : 0.4029

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.96
Bid-YTW : 4.20 %

PWF.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 25.74 – 26.15
Spot Rate : 0.4100
Average : 0.2846

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.74
Bid-YTW : 2.83 %

ENB.PR.F FixedReset Quote: 25.49 – 25.70
Spot Rate : 0.2100
Average : 0.1351

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.49
Bid-YTW : 3.71 %

TCA.PR.X Perpetual-Premium Quote: 51.80 – 52.10
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2313

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-10-15
Maturity Price : 50.00
Evaluated at bid price : 51.80
Bid-YTW : 0.45 %

MFC.PR.H FixedReset Quote: 26.40 – 26.62
Spot Rate : 0.2200
Average : 0.1543

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.40
Bid-YTW : 3.25 %

January 9, 2013

Thursday, January 10th, 2013

A Bank of Canada Working Paper by Katya Kartashova, Ben Tomlin examines House Prices, Consumption and the Role of Non-Mortgage Debt:

This paper examines the relationship between house prices and consumption, through the use of debt. Using unique Canadian household-level data that reports the uses of debt, we begin by looking at the relationship between house prices and debt. Using quantile regression, we find a positive and significant relationship between regional house prices and total household debt all along the conditional debt distribution. This suggests that the household-level relationship between house prices and debt goes beyond the purchase of real estate. We then find a positive relationship between house prices and non-mortgage debt (the sum of secured lines of credit, unsecured lines of credit, leases and other consumer loans, except for credit cards) for homeowners. Combining these results with the reported uses of non-mortgage debt allows us to connect house prices and nonhousing consumption – this connection is new to the literature on house prices and consumption. We conclude that the increases in house prices over the 1999-2007 period were, indeed, associated with an increase in non-mortgage debt and non-housing consumption. Our results can be thought of as the establishment of a conservative lower bound for the overall relationship between house prices and aggregate consumption.

It was a positive day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums gaining 2bp, FixedResets up 3bp and DeemedRetractibles winning 11bp. Volume was average.

PerpetualDiscounts (all four of them! from both issuers!) now yield 4.82%, the equivalent of 6.27% interest at the standard conversion factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield about 4.3%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 195bp, a significant decline from the 210bp reported January 2.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2394 % 2,485.1
FixedFloater 4.25 % 3.62 % 28,055 18.01 1 0.6303 % 3,785.6
Floater 2.80 % 3.00 % 54,935 19.75 4 -0.2394 % 2,683.3
OpRet 4.62 % -4.95 % 51,575 0.39 4 0.1145 % 2,599.2
SplitShare 4.60 % 4.57 % 45,939 4.34 2 0.0000 % 2,892.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1145 % 2,376.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.26 % -0.06 % 77,489 0.75 30 0.0213 % 2,342.1
Perpetual-Discount 4.82 % 4.82 % 133,896 15.80 4 0.0101 % 2,663.8
FixedReset 4.92 % 2.95 % 204,570 4.01 78 0.0282 % 2,472.7
Deemed-Retractible 4.88 % 0.07 % 111,061 0.35 46 0.1104 % 2,434.9
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
NA.PR.K Deemed-Retractible 1.45 % Called for redemption.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-02-08
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.23
Bid-YTW : -12.13 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
CU.PR.C FixedReset 283,463 Scotia crossed 11,500 at 26.40. RBC crossed four blocks of 112,300 shares, 55,300 shares, 80,400 and 10,000, all at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : 2.95 %
SLF.PR.H FixedReset 173,040 RBC crossed blocks of 83,200 and 21,900; and sold blocks of 35,000 and 21,900 to National, all at 25.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 3.65 %
BNS.PR.Z FixedReset 119,512 TD crossed 109,900 at 24.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.74
Bid-YTW : 3.25 %
POW.PR.D Perpetual-Premium 83,587 TD crossed 80,000 at 25.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.21
Bid-YTW : 4.50 %
ENB.PR.P FixedReset 64,578 National crossed 40,000 at 25.37.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-09
Maturity Price : 23.22
Evaluated at bid price : 25.36
Bid-YTW : 3.81 %
ENB.PR.H FixedReset 55,628 TD crossed 10,000 at 25.32; National crossed 40,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-09
Maturity Price : 23.22
Evaluated at bid price : 25.29
Bid-YTW : 3.54 %
There were 32 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 25.89 – 26.15
Spot Rate : 0.2600
Average : 0.1471

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.89
Bid-YTW : 2.25 %

TD.PR.I FixedReset Quote: 26.47 – 26.99
Spot Rate : 0.5200
Average : 0.4149

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.47
Bid-YTW : 2.17 %

PWF.PR.O Perpetual-Premium Quote: 26.50 – 26.85
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2537

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-10-31
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.50
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %

CIU.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 24.70 – 25.00
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2090

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-09
Maturity Price : 23.21
Evaluated at bid price : 24.70
Bid-YTW : 2.92 %

CM.PR.D Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.56 – 25.81
Spot Rate : 0.2500
Average : 0.1731

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-02-08
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.56
Bid-YTW : -24.06 %

PWF.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 25.44 – 25.70
Spot Rate : 0.2600
Average : 0.1966

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-09
Maturity Price : 23.52
Evaluated at bid price : 25.44
Bid-YTW : 3.04 %

January 8, 2013

Tuesday, January 8th, 2013

Interesting take on chaotic theories of markets:

Dr Tobias Galla from The University of Manchester and Professor Doyne Farmer from Oxford University and the Santa Fe Institute, ran thousands of simulations of two-player games to see how human behaviour affects their decision-making.

In simple games with a small number of moves, such as Noughts and Crosses the optimal strategy is easy to guess, and the game quickly becomes uninteresting.

However, when games became more complex and when there are a lot of moves, such as in chess, the board game Go or complex card games, the academics argue that players’ actions become less rational and that it is hard to find optimal strategies.

This research could also have implications for the financial markets. Many economists base financial predictions of the stock market on equilibrium theory – assuming that traders are infinitely intelligent and rational.

This, the academics argue, is rarely the case and could lead to predictions of how markets react being wildly inaccurate.

I wouldn’t call the subjects of the following story “quants”. I’d call them technical analysts. A technical analyst with a computer is simply a technical analyst, and is still going to lose money:

Hedge funds that use computers to follow trends lost money for a second straight year in 2012 as political debates over the U.S. fiscal cliff and Europe’s sovereign-debt crisis roiled markets.

The Newedge CTA Trend Sub-Index, which tracks the performance of the largest computer-driven, or quant funds, fell 3.4 percent last year after a 7.9 percent decline in 2011. David Harding’s $10 billion Winton Futures Fund Ltd. slid 3.5 percent in 2012, its second annual decline since opening in 1997, investors in the pool said. Man Group Plc (EMG)’s $17 billion AHL Diversified fund fell 2.1 percent, while BlueCrest Capital Management’s $14 billion trend-following fund gained 0.02 percent, said the investors, who asked not to be identified because the figures are private.

The performance of the funds belies their popularity with investors, who’ve poured $108.2 billion into the pools since the end of 2008, according to Fairfield, Iowa-based BarclayHedge Ltd.

Trend-followers try to profit by tracking momentum in prices, whether rising or falling. They often use technical indicators, such as moving averages or Bollinger bands, to predict movements for stocks, bonds and commodities. Quants use mathematical algorithms to decide when to buy or sell and rely on computers to respond to price signals in fractions of seconds.

Not only that, but quants do not necessarily engage in High Frequency Trading, either.

OSFI’s Mark Zelmer gave a speech at the 2013 RBC Capital Markets Canadian Bank CEO Conference:

An important New Year’s resolution for OSFI will be to assess which banks in Canada should be designated as domestically systemically-important (D-SIBs). We expect to announce our decision within a few months. Any bank receiving a D-SIB designation can also expect some additional prudential requirements, including having to carry more common equity. The extra capital requirements will take effect in January 2016; the start date for those that will be imposed internationally on globally systemically-important banks. This provides plenty of time for the designated banks to plan accordingly.

Another important resolution for us this year is contingent capital. As of January 1, Canadian deposit-taking institutions are no longer able to include new issues of preferred shares and subordinated debt in their Tier 1 and Total Capital ratios unless those instruments carry Non-Viability Contingent Capital (NVCC) conversion triggers. Existing instruments are being phased out of regulatory capital at a rate of ten per cent per year. Like living wills and other resolution measures, these new instruments are an important ingredient in making sure that all deposit-taking institutions can be resolved in an orderly fashion in times of stress without taxpayers being the first port of call for new capital. OSFI is looking forward to the emergence of a market in Canada for NVCC preferred shares and subordinated debt instruments in 2013.

It was another mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums up 7bp, FixedResets off 1bp and DeemedRetractibles down 5bp. Volatility was negligible. Volume was a little below average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1461 % 2,491.1
FixedFloater 4.28 % 3.64 % 28,356 17.96 1 0.2256 % 3,761.9
Floater 2.79 % 3.00 % 55,156 19.75 4 -0.1461 % 2,689.7
OpRet 4.63 % -5.81 % 51,457 0.40 4 -0.1810 % 2,596.3
SplitShare 4.60 % 4.61 % 46,263 4.34 2 0.4626 % 2,892.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1810 % 2,374.0
Perpetual-Premium 5.26 % -0.06 % 76,907 0.75 30 0.0669 % 2,341.6
Perpetual-Discount 4.82 % 4.82 % 135,583 15.80 4 0.1111 % 2,663.5
FixedReset 4.92 % 2.95 % 203,544 4.07 78 -0.0109 % 2,472.0
Deemed-Retractible 4.88 % 0.86 % 108,753 0.35 46 -0.0504 % 2,432.2
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-08
Maturity Price : 23.71
Evaluated at bid price : 25.67
Bid-YTW : 2.85 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
SLF.PR.H FixedReset 84,715 National crossed 75,000 at 25.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 3.65 %
FTS.PR.G FixedReset 61,993 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-08
Maturity Price : 23.84
Evaluated at bid price : 24.46
Bid-YTW : 3.72 %
CM.PR.K FixedReset 58,459 Scotia crossed 55,000 at 26.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.92
Bid-YTW : 2.73 %
FTS.PR.J Perpetual-Premium 46,460 National bought 16,300 from RBC at 25.79, then crossed 19,400 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2021-12-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.80
Bid-YTW : 4.43 %
RY.PR.L FixedReset 44,800 RBC crossed 36,900 at 26.05.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-02-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.09
Bid-YTW : 2.30 %
ENB.PR.T FixedReset 41,495 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.41
Bid-YTW : 3.79 %
There were 26 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
TD.PR.I FixedReset Quote: 26.50 – 27.00
Spot Rate : 0.5000
Average : 0.2997

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.50
Bid-YTW : 2.09 %

BAM.PR.C Floater Quote: 17.51 – 19.00
Spot Rate : 1.4900
Average : 1.3056

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-08
Maturity Price : 17.51
Evaluated at bid price : 17.51
Bid-YTW : 3.01 %

CM.PR.K FixedReset Quote: 25.92 – 26.34
Spot Rate : 0.4200
Average : 0.2602

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.92
Bid-YTW : 2.73 %

BMO.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 27.11 – 27.40
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1650

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.11
Bid-YTW : 1.68 %

CU.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 26.20 – 26.45
Spot Rate : 0.2500
Average : 0.1560

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : 2.95 %

BAM.PF.A FixedReset Quote: 25.98 – 26.21
Spot Rate : 0.2300
Average : 0.1366

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.98
Bid-YTW : 3.77 %

January 7, 2013

Tuesday, January 8th, 2013

We have more welfare payments to dinosaurs:

The federal government announced a five-year extension of its $250-million Automotive Innovation Fund Friday that was immediately deemed by some industry observers as the ongoing cost of Canada’s continued participating in the North American auto industry.

Why do we subsidize them? Because they’re good jobs. Why are they good jobs? Because they’re subsidized.

The Basel III liquidity rules have been modified:

Global central bank chiefs agreed to water down and delay a planned bank liquidity rule to counter warnings that the proposal would strangle lending and stifle the economic recovery.

Lenders will be allowed to use an expanded range of assets including some equities and securitized mortgage debt to meet the so-called liquidity coverage ratio, or LCR, following a deal struck by regulatory chiefs meeting today in Basel, Switzerland. Banks will also have an extra four years to fully comply with the measure.

A sample of 209 banks assessed by the Basel committee had a collective shortfall of 1.8 trillion euros ($2.3 trillion) at the end of 2011 in the assets needed to meet the 2010 version of the LCR, according to figures published by the Basel group.

Banks had warned that the initial LCR proposal would force them to buy additional sovereign debt, more closely tying their fate to governments’ solvency. The 2010 rule was drafted before the EU was fully confronted by a sovereign debt crisis that challenged traditional assumptions about the credit worthiness of government bonds.

Forcing banks to buy government debt is a form of financial repression.

Bloomberg’s editors are upset about this:

Not for the first time, the panel has retreated from its initial demands, and the final liquidity rule is far less rigorous than the committee had said it wanted and financial markets had been expecting.

The committee issued its draft liquidity rules in 2010. The idea was to lay down the quantity and quality of liquid assets (in theory, assets that can be sold quickly without driving down prices) that banks must hold to cover a run on deposits or some other interruption in short-term funding. Under pressure from banks, especially those in the U.S., most aspects of the draft proposal have been weakened in the final document.

For instance, the new rule says liquidity must be enough to cover a 30-day run on insured retail deposits of 3 percent, instead of 5 percent as proposed. It also expands the range of corporate debt securities that qualify as liquid to BBB- (the lower boundary of “investment grade”); previously, the committee said nothing less than AA- should be eligible. High-quality mortgage-backed securities will also count.

This broadening of qualifying assets means that almost all banks already satisfy the rule — a point that was acknowledged by Bank of England Governor Mervyn King, the chairman of the rule-setting committee.

As guttings go, this is pretty thorough. It confirms the committee’s reputation for delay, backsliding and willingness to accommodate the preferences of banks — the industry it’s supposed to be supervising. If the panel had been mindful of its credibility, it would have issued a draft it was willing to defend in the face of expected pressure from the industry.

William Cohan on Bloomberg has a nice piece on the realities of regulation:

Instead of taking a job at a big Wall Street investment bank, he [“Dock2” Treece] returned home to Toledo, Ohio, and joined, as a partner, his father’s tiny investment-advisory firm, Treece Investment Advisory Corp., and the family broker-dealer, Treece Financial Services Corp. The two companies have five employees: Dock2 Treece, his father, his younger brother and two administrators.

The Treeces’ 2010 Finra exam, however, went on for eight months, as the regulators kept asking for more and more documents to try to discover a minor technical point about what kind of mutual funds the firm sold to its customers.

Treece said Finra kept telling him to sell a kind of mutual fund that he knew he wasn’t supposed to sell, but the examiners seemed to not understand the rules. To fulfill one Finra request required 4,000 pages of documents to be copied and sent off.

“It had taken my staff two weeks to get together, literally, just standing in front of a copy machine for 12 hours a day, pull a file out, take the documents out that they wanted, copy them, put them in a box, put the originals back in the file, and put the file back,” Treece said. “I mean, talk about useless.”

He said he spent more than $30,000 in legal fees — chicken feed on Wall Street but a big deal at a tiny firm — trying to convince the examiners of something they should have known about all along.

Here’s an idea for Toronto – Subway Savings Bonds!

Malaysia, Southeast Asia’s biggest local-currency bond market, will let retail investors fund Kuala Lumpur’s new subway when it starts marketing its first exchange- traded notes to individuals.

DanaInfra will offer 300 million ringgit ($99 million) of government-guaranteed Islamic securities to individuals, Ashraf Radzi, associate director of Prokhas Sdn., a financial adviser to the company, said in Jan. 3 interview. He declined to give specific details such as yields or maturity.

The bonds, which pay returns on assets to comply with the Koran’s ban on interest, will be sold in increments of 100 ringgit, or the equivalent of $33, with a minimum order value of 1,000 ringgit, Bursa Malaysia’s Tajuddin said.

Rob Carrick of the Globe has weighed in on trailers:

What regulators should do is order the replacement of trailing commissions with a fee that is set by the adviser as a percentage of the client’s assets, to be withdrawn quarterly from cash holdings in the client’s account. The investment industry should introduce the phrase “advice fee” and create standards under which this fee would cover not only investment management, but financial planning.

He means, fees should be charged in the way an actual portfolio manager charges fees, forgetting that there’s one problem with this model: a huge segment of the investing public doesn’t want it. ‘There was no trading!’ says Joe Blow. ‘Why should I pay if there was no trading?’.

I also see that Mr. Carrick wants to force me to offer financial planning, despite the fact that I do not want to offer financial planning. It’s a ludicrous idea … any single person can be good at only so many things; I have chosen to be good at quantitative investment strategies, fixed income in general and preferred shares in particular. Now I’m going to be forced to offer financial planning? What’s next, I have to offer golf games and hockey tickets to big clients and hire a pretty receptionist?

Still another hurdle is you, the investor. You can be half to two-thirds excused for your fee ignorance because of the way you’ve been manipulated by the investing industry.

Totally wrong. There is full disclosure all over the place. Anybody who doesn’t know about fees hasn’t done any work at all. Is that another job Mr. Carrick wants to give me? Reading aloud the prospectus to prospective clients?

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualPremiums up 8bp, FixedResets down 3bp and DeemedRetractibles off 2bp. Volatility was average. Volume recovered, to average levels.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2796 % 2,494.7
FixedFloater 4.29 % 3.65 % 28,488 17.94 1 -0.6278 % 3,753.4
Floater 2.79 % 3.00 % 54,335 19.75 4 0.2796 % 2,693.6
OpRet 4.62 % -5.77 % 49,672 0.40 4 -0.0476 % 2,601.0
SplitShare 4.63 % 4.68 % 47,851 4.34 2 0.0000 % 2,879.3
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0476 % 2,378.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.24 % 0.14 % 73,092 0.76 30 0.0826 % 2,340.0
Perpetual-Discount 4.82 % 4.82 % 134,770 15.79 4 0.5382 % 2,660.6
FixedReset 4.92 % 2.91 % 203,750 4.01 78 -0.0252 % 2,472.3
Deemed-Retractible 4.87 % 0.44 % 108,687 0.35 46 -0.0218 % 2,433.4
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
FTS.PR.H FixedReset -1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-07
Maturity Price : 23.63
Evaluated at bid price : 25.39
Bid-YTW : 2.90 %
IFC.PR.C FixedReset -1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.31
Bid-YTW : 2.75 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset 1.02 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 3.42 %
ELF.PR.G Perpetual-Discount 1.11 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-07
Maturity Price : 24.07
Evaluated at bid price : 24.57
Bid-YTW : 4.82 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
HSB.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 67,500 National crossed 47,200 at 26.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-02-06
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 26.00
Bid-YTW : -16.86 %
BAM.PR.Z FixedReset 61,776 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 26.41.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.41
Bid-YTW : 3.60 %
BAM.PR.P FixedReset 60,397 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 27.13.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.03
Bid-YTW : 2.29 %
ENB.PR.T FixedReset 40,890 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-07
Maturity Price : 23.22
Evaluated at bid price : 25.38
Bid-YTW : 3.80 %
CU.PR.D Perpetual-Premium 39,600 RBC crossed 38,300 at 26.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2021-09-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.35
Bid-YTW : 4.24 %
GWO.PR.P Deemed-Retractible 36,980 RBC crossed 30.700 at 26.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.51
Bid-YTW : 4.62 %
There were 31 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.C Floater Quote: 17.50 – 19.00
Spot Rate : 1.5000
Average : 1.1035

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-07
Maturity Price : 17.50
Evaluated at bid price : 17.50
Bid-YTW : 3.01 %

BMO.PR.H Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.47 – 25.92
Spot Rate : 0.4500
Average : 0.2602

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-02-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.47
Bid-YTW : -3.96 %

FTS.PR.H FixedReset Quote: 25.39 – 25.85
Spot Rate : 0.4600
Average : 0.2870

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2043-01-07
Maturity Price : 23.63
Evaluated at bid price : 25.39
Bid-YTW : 2.90 %

BMO.PR.M FixedReset Quote: 25.10 – 25.40
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.1807

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.10
Bid-YTW : 3.28 %

MFC.PR.D FixedReset Quote: 26.50 – 26.79
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.1784

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.50
Bid-YTW : 2.63 %

MFC.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 26.15 – 26.41
Spot Rate : 0.2600
Average : 0.1529

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-12-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.15
Bid-YTW : 3.23 %

ABK.PR.B To Be Refunded On Reorganization

Monday, January 7th, 2013

Scotia Managed Companies has announced:

Allbanc Split Corp. (the “Company”) announced today that the final condition required to extend the term of the Company for an additional five years to March 9, 2018 has been met as holders of 85.6% of Class A Capital Shares have elected to extend. Holders of Class A Capital Shares on December 13, 2012 approved the extension of the term of the Company subject to the condition that a minimum of 361,000 Class A Capital Shares remain outstanding after giving effect to the special retraction right (the “Special Retraction Right”).

Under the Special Retraction Right, 104,212 Class A Capital Shares were tendered to the Company for retraction on March 8, 2013. The holders of the remaining 617,252 Class A Capital Shares will continue to enjoy the benefits of a leveraged participation in the capital appreciation of the Company’s portfolio of publicly listed common shares of Bank of Montreal, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Royal Bank of Canada, The Bank of Nova Scotia and The Toronto-Dominion Bank while potentially deferring any capital gains tax liability which would otherwise be realized on the redemption of their Class A Capital Shares.

The Company’s Class B preferred shares will be redeemed by the Company on March 8, 2013 in accordance with the redemption provisions as detailed in the Company’s March 3, 2008 prospectus. Pursuant to these provisions, the Class B preferred shares will be redeemed at a price per share equal to the lesser of $26.75 and the Unit Value. In order to maintain the leveraged “split share” structure of the Company, the Company intends to create and issue a new series of Class C preferred shares, which are expected to be issued following this redemption. In addition, the Company may also undertake a concurrent public offering of additional Class A Capital Shares at the same time the Class C preferred shares are offered.

Capital Shares and Class B preferred shares of Allbanc Split Corp. are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols “ABK.A” and “ABK.PR.B”, respectively.

ABK.PR.B is a fairly small issue, with less than half a million shares outstanding with a par value of $26.75 each.

ABK.PR.B was last mentioned on PrefBlog when they proposed this transaction. ABK.PR.B is not tracked by HIMIPref™.

Updated, 2013-1-28: New issue provisionally rated Pfd-2(low) by DBRS.