Category: Market Action

Better late than never!

Today’s hot news is the Bank of Canada statement:

In Canada, the quarterly pattern of growth has been uneven. Real GDP grew by 2.4 per cent in the first quarter but is estimated to have contracted by 1 per cent in the second quarter, pulled down by volatile trade flows, uneven consumer spending, and the Alberta wildfires. A pick-up to 3 1/2 per cent is expected in the third quarter as oil production resumes and rebuilding begins in Fort McMurray. Consumer spending will also get a boost from the Canada Child Benefit.

While the fundamental elements of the Bank’s projection are similar to those presented in April, the forecast has been revised down in light of a weaker outlook for business investment and a lower profile for exports, reflecting a downward adjustment to US investment spending. Real GDP is expected to grow by 1.3 per cent in 2016, 2.2 per cent in 2017, and 2.1 per cent in 2018.
…
The Bank forecasts that the output gap will close somewhat later than estimated in April, towards the end of 2017. Underlying this judgement is the downward revision to business investment, which lowers the profile for both real GDP and, to a lesser extent, potential output.

While inflation has recently been a little higher than anticipated, largely due to higher consumer energy prices, it is still in the lower half of the Bank’s inflation-control range. Most measures of core inflation remain close to 2 per cent but would be lower without the impact of past exchange rate depreciation. The temporary effects of exchange-rate pass-through and past declines in consumer energy prices are expected to dissipate in late 2016, and the Bank projects that inflation will average close to 2 per cent throughout 2017 as the output gap narrows.

Overall, the risks to the profile for inflation are roughly balanced, although the implications of the Brexit vote are highly uncertain and difficult to forecast. At the same time, financial vulnerabilities are elevated and rising, particularly in the greater Vancouver and Toronto areas. The Bank’s Governing Council judges that the overall balance of risks remains within the zone for which the current stance of monetary policy is appropriate, and the target for the overnight rate remains at 1/2 per cent.

In addition the July 2016 Monetary Policy Report was released:

In the housing market, new construction and resale activity remain robust in British Columbia and Ontario, supported by strong demand, in part attributable to population and employment growth. The same factors are fuelling house price increases in these regions, particularly the greater Vancouver and Toronto areas. Sharply rising prices in these markets over the past year raise the possibility that prices are also being driven by self-reinforcing expectations, making them more sensitive to an adverse shock to housing demand. In contrast, housing activity and house prices in the energy-producing provinces have declined; elsewhere in the country, housing growth has been modest, with most markets appearing balanced. Over the projection horizon, the contribution of residential investment to real GDP growth is anticipated to decrease and household sector vulnerabilities to stabilize.

Incompetent traders rejoice! The world got safer for complacent, incompetent traders today!

Michael Coscia, the first person convicted of spoofing after it was made a crime under the Dodd-Frank Act, was sentenced to less than half the prison time sought by federal prosecutors.

Coscia, 54, who had argued for probation, was sentenced Wednesday to three years in prison by U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber in Chicago. The only explanation for Coscia engaging in fraud while he was making $150,000 a month trading futures and had a net worth of $15 million was greed, the judge said.

“This is a serious crime with serious consequences,” Leinenweber said before handing down the sentence. He noted that spoofing has been going on for a long time.

Spoofing, which became illegal under the Dodd-Frank Act, carries a maximum of 10 years in prison. The practice typically consists of systematically placing orders without intending to execute them to trick the market into thinking there’s interest in buying or selling that doesn’t actually exist.

Today’s Wall Street Journal brings an attack on Universal Basic Income:

Jason Furman, chairman of the council, suggests that multiple forces, including globalization, automation, and incarceration (many jobs are closed to ex-convicts) has reduced demand for low-skilled workers. What employers will pay for unskilled labor is below what economists refer to as the “reservation wage”: Some workers simply won’t work for so little money.

What’s the solution? If outside forces are depressing low-skilled wages, that strengthens the case for subsidizing those wages so that they will work for what employers can pay. This can be done by expanding the earned-income tax credit, which tops up poor worker’s salaries, and wage insurance, which pays a laid-off worker to accept a lower-paying job. This can’t be done through UBI, which is paid regardless of whether the recipient works, and, according to some studies, encourages some recipients to quit.

Try as I might, I fail to see a problem here. We can agree, I think, that yes, a Universal Income will decrease the number of people willing to work as a Starbucks barista for $15/hour. Many will continue to do it because they just want to get out of the house, others will do it for the extra income, but for the sake of an argument, let’s assume that the require wage goes to $20/hour.

OK, fine. This is not a problem this is just a shift to a new equilibrium in accordance with first year economics. Starbucks will raise the price of their coffee, people will buy less coffee, fewer baristas will be hired and supply will equal demand. Big deal.

The big advantage, not mentioned in the article, is that this will have the same effect on the market as a rise in the minimum wage: low skill jobs will be increasingly automated. Starbucks coffee will go to $6/cup, but there’ll be a new place down the street, Supernovabucks, with fully automated ordering (via your own ‘phone or an in-store kiosk) and robotic coffee making you can see … everything made to order in front of your eyes, with precise settings available for the thickness of the foam on your latte (or whatever it is that is supposed to be so great about Starbucks. I don’t go there). Supernovabucks stores will have only one employee on site, filling up the supply hoppers and cleaning the counters.

And all this will be a Good Thing. Productivity has increased – and it is productivity that makes us rich, not redistribution.

The other problem the WSJ article had was increased taxes. Well, of course marginal tax rates will go up – it can’t be paid for entirely by elimination of suddenly redundant social programmes. Reginald Plutocrat III will be getting his annual cheque for $10,000 and including that in his annual income; if we assume that his current average tax rate is 50% and his income is $150,000, then his average tax rate will have to increase to a little over 53% to make the whole package revenue-neutral for him. And if it’s not revenue neutral – at best – for upper income earners, then the whole thing becomes a wealth transfer from the poor to the rich, which I suspect won’t fly politically.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.21%, equivalent to 6.77% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield about 3.70%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 305bp, a sharp narrowing from the 330bp reported July 6.

It seems to me that this here internet thingamajig might be useful for business:

Home renovation chain Rona says its efforts to attract tech-savvy shoppers got a recent boost when the retailer temporarily replaced its printed flyer with an expanded digital offering.

The Montreal-based company says sales doubled at its stores across Canada despite scrapping the printed flyer during a nationwide test one week in February.
…
Jean Coutu, one of Canada’s largest pharmacy networks, said it’s also seeing success with its digital efforts. The company said cosmetic sales got a five per cent lift after it twice published a 20-page digital flyer this year enhanced with videos on the Montreal La Presse Plus tablet and website.

How about that new Brookfield infrastructure fund, eh?:

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (“Brookfield”) (NYSE: BAM, TSX: BAM.A, Euronext: BAMA) announced today that it held the final close on Brookfield Infrastructure Fund III (“BIF III” or the “Fund”) with an aggregate of $14 billion of equity commitments, creating a global infrastructure fund that invests in high-quality, core infrastructure assets on a value basis.

BIF III marks the largest private fund raised by Brookfield and the largest private infrastructure fund ever raised in the industry. In the last 18 months, Brookfield has raised approximately $27 billion across its flagship private fund strategies, including the close of its flagship real estate fund, Brookfield Strategic Real Estate Partners II at $9 billion, and its flagship private equity fund, Brookfield Capital Partners IV at $4 billion. All three funds surpassed their fundraising targets.

To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction:

As recreational and commercially available drones become more advanced, areas that are off limits are having to develop plans to keep drones out. Other than taking a rifle and shooting one down, there really aren’t many options on the market to keep drones away from places like prisons, military bases, and other restricted air spaces. Dedrone is a company seeking to bridge that market gap by creating a drone detection and jamming system. Using an array of sensors, lasers, and jammers, the Dedrone system will detect when a malicious drone enters designated airspace and automatically take defensive action.

There’s a causal link between Brexit and the commercial property chaos:

Some commercial property buyers are invoking “Brexit clauses” written into contracts agreed before Britain voted to leave the European Union, allowing them to walk away from the deals.

In other cases buyers have yet to exercise such get-out clauses but are keeping the option open to try to renegotiate the price down, according to property lawyers and managers.

A third group is playing for time in the hope that the effect of the June 23 referendum result on values becomes clearer, they say.

Jobs, jobs, jobs!

America’s job market stirred to life in June as payroll growth accelerated by the most since October after a two-month lull, assuaging fears of broader cutbacks by companies.

Payrolls climbed by 287,000 last month, exceeding the highest estimate in a Bloomberg survey, after a revised 11,000 gain in May, a Labor Department report showed Friday. The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey called for a 180,000 increase. The jobless rate rose to 4.9 percent as more people entered the labor force. Wages advanced less than projected.
…
Wages improved modestly, with average hourly earnings climbing 0.1 percent from a month earlier. The year-over-year increase was 2.6 percent, less than the 2.7 percent median forecast.

The average work week for all workers held at 34.4 hours in June.

In Canada, not so much:

Canada’s unemployment rate dipped slightly in June, despite a sharp drop in full-time jobs and other evidence of a weak month for hiring, as the number of people actively participating in the labour force declined.

Statistics Canada’s monthly Labour Force Survey showed that the unemployment rate fell to 6.8 per cent in June from 6.9 per cent in May, even though employment actually slipped a thin 700 jobs in the month – an essentially flat reading in a survey that has a statistical margin of error of plus or minus 29,500 each month. The lower unemployment rate was the result of a dip in the participation rate – the percentage of the working-age population that is either working or actively seeking work – to 65.5 per cent from 65.7 per cent, marking a 16-year low.

Bloomberg has a good piece on the power of Big Taxi in Vancouver:

On the face of it, Uber and Vancouver seem like a match made in ride-sharing heaven. Canada’s third-largest metropolis bills itself as Silicon Valley North—home to local unicorn Hootsuite and a thriving tech scene that employs thousands of young people. Public transportation is spotty, there are half as many taxis per 1,000 people as in Toronto, and the sprawling city of 2.5 million suffers from the nation’s worst traffic. In May, the website Vancity Buzz (now Daily Hive) reported that arriving cruise-ship passengers waited 90 minutes to catch a cab, forming a line 600 feet long. Vancouver seems purpose-built for ride-sharing.
…
Vancouver is something of an outlier in Canada. Uber has operated in Toronto since 2012, despite a regulatory debate raging over its legality. Earlier this year, Canada’s largest city passed new rules for ride-hailing apps, slightly raising the base fare for an Uber ride and letting traditional taxis charge surge pricing for rides booked through apps. Uber, which has more than 400,000 regular users in Toronto, welcomed the rules while taxi representatives grumbled. In Quebec, Uber has 450,000 users, mostly in Montreal. The province’s transportation minister has been critical of the company, but put off passing a bill last month that would have required drivers to obtain taxi licenses in favor of more consultation.

Critics say British Columbia’s government is bowing to Vancouver’s powerful taxi industry. Kulwant Sahota, president of Yellow Cab Co. and the Vancouver Taxi Association, says Uber will provide unfair competition for cabbies at a time when the cost of living has soared. It’s a message the industry has hammered hard. “The taxi lobby has been very successful,” says Gillen, who adds that industry representatives often attend fundraisers for the ruling Liberal party.

Oh, well, they can get left behind if they want to. It’s good news for Toronto!

The Canadian Securities Administrators recently issued a notice regarding T+2 settlement:

Staff of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA Staff or we) are publishing this notice to increase awareness and summarize our views with respect to a Canadian industry move to shorten the standard settlement cycle for most trades in securities from three days after the date of trade (T+3) to two days after the date of trade (T+2).

In October 2014, most of the markets in Europe moved from a T+3 settlement cycle to T+2.{1} The securities industry in the United States, led by the U.S. Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) and supported by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), has announced plans to shorten the settlement cycle to T+2 from the current T+3.{2} DTCC and SIFMA have established a broadly-based set of working groups with a mandate to report their findings in April, 2015. The plan is to recommend a T+2 implementation date at that time.

During the Fall of 2014, in anticipation of the U.S. move to a shorter settlement cycle, staff from the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) conducted a sample of industry interviews to gain a sense of the readiness of the Canadian industry to make the move to T+2. All the industry participants interviewed expressed the view that the Canadian industry must make the move to T+2 at the same time as the U.S. markets. Failure to do so would be detrimental to the Canadian capital markets due to the interconnectedness of our markets (i.e., the large volumes and value of cross-border trades and the large number of inter-listed securities). At the same time, there would appear to be little, or no, benefit to be gained by moving prior to the U.S.

And today, SEC Commissioner Michael S. Piwowar issued a statement of his own:

Just over a year ago, Commissioner Stein and I issued a joint statement in support of a proposal to shorten the trade settlement cycle from three business days after a trade is executed (T+3) to two business days (T+2).[1] Our voices added to the chorus of endorsements for such a rulemaking,[2] which have since reached a crescendo.[3] The drumbeat for Commission action on this important topic is premised on the general expectation that shortening the settlement cycle will, among other benefits, enhance the efficiency of the securities markets, decrease risks in the financial system to retail investors and other market participants, and conform trade processing in the United States to other global markets.

Despite the widespread support for a proposal that would shorten the settlement cycle to T+2, the Commission has yet to act. Quite notably, our failure to promulgate such a proposal is in contravention of the agency rule list published in the most recent Regulatory Flexibility Agenda, which specified a June 2016 action date for this project.[4] Also, we have left market participants wondering whether the Commission is truly committed to shortening the settlement cycle.

The delay in issuing a T+2 proposal is wholly unacceptable. That the rulemaking has languished is not only frustrating to me personally, but is detrimental to efforts to improve investor protection. I continue to vigorously advocate for the Commission to act promptly on this rulemaking, and I encourage others to do the same.

And – totally off topic, but I can’t resist – an Ontario cabinet minister is spouting the Chinese government line:

Mr. Kenney’s recent comments arose after Mr. Chan defended China’s record on human rights in a Chinese-language column.

“Human rights should be viewed from the perspective of livelihood issues,” he told an unidentified journalist for a June 6 article that appeared in several Chinese-language publications. “The progress of human rights is complementary and linked together with the progress of people’s welfare.”

The comments were made in response to a diplomatic incident last month involving a news conference held by Foreign Affairs Minister Stéphane Dion and Wang Yi, his Chinese counterpart.

The Great British Property Fund Debacle keeps getting worse:

The uncertainty sweeping across Britain’s commercial property market in the wake of Brexit has affected more funds, including a few owned by Canadian firms.

Bank of Montreal’s Global Asset Management adjusted its U.K. property fund because of an increased number of redemption requests after the June 24 referendum vote in Britain to leave the European Union.

On July 7, BMO’s asset management division announced that its F&C UK Property Fund had cut the price of its units 5 per cent. It said the change was a result of a move to “fair value pricing” that accounted for the uncertainty and downward pressure surrounding commercial real estate property values in Britain.

“The level of redemption requests we have recently received and market conditions suggest that investors may place further redemptions, leading to downward pressure on realizable property values,” the company stated on its website page for the fund, which invests directly in U.K. commercial real estate.

BMO GAM said it has also increased the frequency of valuations for the buildings owned in the fund from a monthly to a weekly basis as a result of the “significant market volatility” following the Brexit vote, requiring closer monitoring as a result.

Last month, BMO GAM’s fact sheet on F&C UK Property said the fund had a value of £305-million ($512.2-million) and a unit price of £110.80. On Thursday, the unit price had fallen to £98.43, a drop of £12.37 or 11.16 per cent.

The unfolding story of British commercial property funds, last discussed July 5, continues to add drama to our hum-drum lives:

Henderson Global Investors and Columbia Threadneedle Investments suspended trading in at least 5.3 billion pounds ($6.9 billion) of property funds, taking the number of U.K. asset managers curbing redemptions to five in the wake of Britain’s shock decision to leave the European Union.
…
Henderson said Wednesday it had temporarily suspended its 3.9 billion-pound U.K. Property PAIF fund and feeder funds due to “exceptional liquidity pressures” and the recent suspension of other competitor’s funds. Columbia Threadneedle has also halted its 1.39 billion-pound PAIF and feeder funds, according to a statement.

M&G Investments, Aviva Investors and Standard Life Investments have also halted withdrawals in their real estate funds. About 24.5 billion pounds is allocated to U.K. real estate funds, according to the Investment Association.

and:

Canada Life Limited said on Wednesday it was suspending its property funds, becoming the sixth firm this week to do so.

Canada Life said in a notice to investors seen by Reuters that it was suspending its Canlife Property and Canlife UK Property life and pensions funds with effect from 1400 GMT July 5.

The firm said it made the decision due to “ongoing uncertainty around the pricing of commercial property assets, following the vote to leave the EU, and the recent rise in requests to withdraw…from the property funds.”

This is a good reminder for holders of junk funds:

Only about 7 percent of the total commercial real estate market is held in daily-dealing funds, according to the Bank of England. Meanwhile more than 90 percent of all European corporate debt funds, including high-yield bonds, offer daily redemptions, according to Fitch Ratings.

The credit markets had a recent taste for how a liquidity mismatch might play out when in December Third Avenue Management froze withdrawals from a $788 million credit mutual fund, saying it couldn’t meet redemptions without resorting to fire sales. The move triggered a selloff in high-yield bonds and stock markets and prompted other funds to close.

The ECB recently published an ‘Occasional Paper’ titled Shadow banking in the euro area: risks and vulnerabilities in the investment fund sector that discussed the issue:

Investment funds are said to perform liquidity transformation whenever it takes more time to liquidate invested assets than to exchange fund shares for cash. Such liquidity transformation should in general deliver a positive return: investors are able to gain exposure to less liquid, possibly higher yielding assets, while at the same time maintaining access to their funds at short notice.

However, liquidity transformation also carries a financial stability risk similar to the run-risk in deposit-taking institutions. The social cost of liquidity transformation may not be evident until many investors wish to redeem their shares at the same time. Such costs include rising yield spreads in the underlying securities, rising asset liquidation costs, or the inability to sell fund shares if redemptions are suspended. Investors may be able to minimise their individual cost by exiting a fund early rather than late, i.e. before other investors do. Such first-mover advantages can create strategic interactions among investors, including the risk of bank-like runs,30 resulting in higher costs for the system as a whole (see Box 3).

By offering daily callable claims for investing in less liquid instruments, open-end funds may further add to the illusion of liquidity if investors do not properly discount for the liquidity transformation risk.

All this excitement is having an effect on my favourite metric:

Japan and France are leading the way as demand for the safest assets boosts the amount of global bonds with negative yields to $9.8 trillion, according to Bloomberg World Sovereign Bond Indexes. That’s up from $8.35 trillion before Britain voted to leave the European Union last month. The latest new entrants include Japan’s 20-year bonds, and French nine-year securities, which both saw yields drop below zero for the first time in the past 24 hours.

I’m very disappointed with recent developments in US college tuition proposals:

Hillary Clinton is changing her college-affordability plan in an effort to reach Bernie Sanders supporters, proposing the elimination of public in-state tuition for students whose families make less than $125,000.
…
Throughout the Democratic primary campaign, Sanders advocated eliminating tuition at public colleges and universities, something he said could be done at a cost of $75 billion annually, funded by a new Wall Street speculation tax.

Clinton said the plan was unworkable and that it didn’t make sense for tax dollars to go toward the tuition of students who can afford to pay, often citing Trump’s children and grandchildren as examples.
…
Her compromise with Sanders, billed by her campaign as incorporating “a key principle” from Sanders’ plan, would eliminate in-state tuition for students for whose families earn less than $125,000. It would be phased in over the course of four years, starting with families that earn up to $85,000 and raising the income threshold by $10,000 a year until 2021.

The first problem is that it’s free. Free stuff gets wasted. I don’t want kids to graduate with crippling debt that destroys their ability to take a few risks with employment; but I don’t want them to spend two years partying because it doesn’t cost anything, either. There should be a direct cost; not enough to cover the whole price, but significant enough that one will be sad if it’s thrown away.

The second problem is that it’s not universal. This bloody means-testing, it’s one of the biggest impediments to self-improvement going. First, say you have family income of $105,000. Well, guess what Junior! You’re not going to college for two years, because then it will be free, compared to $25,000 p.a. now. So that’s a problem with the phase-in. And the problem with means testing is, as always, obvious to anybody with the brains he was born with: if a family makes $120,000 and has a kid at university, then improving their situation to $130,000 will actually cost them money.

Remember the very public Wal-Mart / Visa battle?:

The clock is ticking on Walmart’s pledge to stop accepting Visa cards at its Canadian stores. The retail giant confirmed that starting on July 18, customers will no longer be able to use the credit card at its three locations in Thunder Bay, Ont.

But the Visa ban may never come to your neighbourhood Walmart, a business and economics expert tells CBC News.

Carleton University professor Ian Lee believes the retailer is conducting a slow, strategic rollout because it expects to reach a compromise with Visa — long before Walmart has to drop the credit card from all its Canadian stores.

“It’s very deliberate, it’s very calculated,” says Lee. “They’re playing a high-stakes game of chicken.”

Well, here’s a bit of news some might consider related:

Wal-Mart will now let you pay with its phone app at all 4,600 stores nationwide.

The effort is part of Wal-Mart’s strategy to make shopping easier and faster, while learning more about consumer behaviour.

With Wal-Mart Pay, the cashier scans a QR code on the phone screen to charge a credit, debit or Wal-Mart gift card linked with the account. It differs from Apple, Samsung and Android Pay, which involves tapping your phone next to a payment machine with a wireless technology called NFC.

In December, Wal-Mart said it would develop its own digital wallet rather than honour existing systems from Apple and others, though Wal-Mart said it isn’t ruling out third-party wallets in the future.

Retailers have been pushing their own systems in part because they retain control. Daniel Eckert, senior vice-president of services at Wal-Mart U.S., says data from the app will be used to improve the shopping experience. One way, he said, would be to use past shopping behaviour to build a personalized shopping list. The customer could then delete or add items. He said such features would be done only with a customer’s permission.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.35%, equivalent to 6.96% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield 3.65% (!) so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread is now about 330bp, a significant widening from the 310bp reported June 22.

Yesterday I mentioned redemptions in property funds in the UK and the suspension of redemptions in the Standard Life fund. Standard Life has company!

Three of the U.K.’s largest real estate funds have frozen almost 9.1 billion pounds ($12 billion) of assets after Britain’s shock vote to leave the European Union sparked a flurry of redemptions.

M&G Investments, Aviva Investors and Standard Life Investments halted withdrawals because they don’t have enough cash to immediately repay investors. About 24.5 billion pounds is allocated to U.K. real estate funds, according to the Investment Association.
…
The rush by private investors to withdraw money prompted M&G, which held 7.7 percent in cash before the vote, to suspend its 4.4 billion-pound Property Portfolio fund and Aviva Investors to freeze its 1.8 billion-pound Property Trust on Tuesday. Standard Life halted trading on its 2.9 billion-pound U.K. real estate fund on Monday. The cash position for Aviva and Standard Life’s funds at the end of May was 9.3 percent and 13.1 percent respectively, documents showed.

There has been concern for a long time about the effects of having a very liquid layer of ETFs representing investments in highly illiquid assets, so it will be interesting to see how this plays out. Have investors been over-paying for liquidity? Will the regulators develop so many liquidity rules that the sector cannot function?

The federal Bombardier bail-out is on hold:

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government doesn’t expect to reach an aid deal with aircraft manufacturer Bombardier Inc. before the fall, according to officials familiar with the talks.
…
Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains, the government’s point-person in negotiations, is due to meet with Bombardier executives next week at the Farnborough International Airshow. Negotiations, however, remain stalled and Trudeau’s team expects no developments this summer, believing Bombardier has a year or more before it faces a serious cash crunch, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity as the talks are private.

Some analysts are attempting to come to grips with the effect of self-driving cars:

But what if by 2030 more people are willing to embrace self-driving cars? All the legal and regulatory issues have been ironed out and people have grown comfortable with the idea of riding rather than driving. Under this scenario, 30 percent of cars belong to shared autonomous fleets. Another 23 percent of privately owned cars are fully autonomous. Only 47 percent of the cars are private conventional vehicles.

This shift to higher-occupancy, longer-lasting vehicles would result in an 8.6 percent decline in vehicle sales (compared to the baseline 16.5 million units that would be needed to meet organic demand in 2030 if nothing changed.)

In the most extreme scenario, the number of cars on the road would fall by half because more people would rely on shared, autonomous vehicles rather than privately owned vehicles. (Call Uber for a ride, and a robot car would pick you up, or take a train to the city, and hop in a driverless cab for the last mile. Even families could share one autonomous car.)

Those shared vehicles would rack up miles faster, however, so they would need to be replaced sooner. The net result for automakers: a 26 percent drop in vehicle demand.

The world’s biggest pension fund is being criticized for high risk:

Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund will probably post a 4.4 trillion yen ($43 billion) loss in the April-June quarter, according to calculations by Yohei Iwao, executive director of the institutional equities division at Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities Co. That follows what he estimates was a 5 trillion yen decline in the fiscal year ended March 31, which would amount to the worst performance since fiscal 2009 when the fund lost 9.7 trillion yen.

The calculations come amid criticism the government has put the public’s pension money at risk after the fund known as the whale for the size of its assets increased its equity allocations in 2014. That’s prompted the main opposition party to pledge GPIF will move investments back into safer ones in its manifesto ahead of elections this month.
…
GPIF likely held about 43 percent of its portfolio in domestic bonds at the end of June, higher than its target of 35 percent for the asset, he said. Japanese stocks probably accounted for 22 percent, while international equities made up 22 percent, Iwao said. He estimates foreign debt stood at 14 percent. GPIF’s target for equities is 25 percent each, and 15 percent for international bonds.

It is interesting that the fund has a much more conservative asset mix than the Canada Pension Plan!

Brexit’s implications are far-reaching:

Realtors in Toronto and Vancouver are pitching Canadian cities as relatively safe property havens now that London, for years one of the world’s leading targets of foreign capital, suddenly looks a lot riskier. Blame it on Brexit.

“Brexit’s good for us, not for them,” said Anita Springate-Renaud, owner of Engel & Völkers’ brokerage in Toronto, who expects to field calls from clients seeking to redirect their investments. “We are a safe bet.”

If Springate-Renaud is right, there may be heightened demand from moneyed clients for homes and condos as well as office towers in two of Canada’s hottest real estate markets, which already have seen prices soar from an influx of foreign money.
…
Royal LePage is advising clients that Brexit is likely to cause the Bank of Canada to hold interest rates lower for longer, which will stoke demand in the residential market, said Adil Dinani, a Vancouver agent for the unit of Brookfield Real Estate Services Inc.

Any additional trickle of demand into Vancouver and Toronto could prove a headache for Canadian policy makers seeking to damp record high home prices. In recent weeks, the International Monetary Fund, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, and Bank of Canada have all flagged the increasing risk of a potential correction.

“It’s something we’re going to have to talk about because there are concerns about overheating,” said Royal LePage’s Dinani. “We’ll likely see more capital inflows into these cities, so what is that going to look like? Are there going to be policy tools put in place to protect the market from further increases?”

And there may be some money on the way!

Standard Life Investments suspended trading in its 2.9 billion-pound ($3.9 billion) U.K. Real Estate fund on Monday after Britain’s vote to leave the European Union triggered a surge in redemptions.

The fund, which invests in a mix of prime commercial real estate assets, was halted at midday and the decision will be reviewed every 28 days, the Edinburgh, Scotland-based fund manager said in a statement. Standard Life adjusted the value of the underlying assets by 5 percent last week.
…
Investors are pulling money as industry commentators warn that London office values could fall by as much as 20 percent within three years of the country leaving the European Union. [Hargreaves Lansdown analyst Laith] Khalaf estimated that about 25 billion pounds is invested in property sector funds by U.K. investors, including those that invest in stocks.