Market Action

September 6, 2011

The US has a new plan to balance its books, remarkably similar to Europe’s:

Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) were among 17 banks sued by the U.S. to recoup $196 billion spent on mortgage-backed securities bought by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency, on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, filed 17 lawsuits yesterday in New York state and federal courts and in federal court in Connecticut. The FHFA accuses the banks of misleading Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac about the soundness of the mortgages underlying the securities.

The UK government may have caught a sanity germ:

U.K. Prime Minister will seek a “significant watering down” of a planned overhaul in banking regulations because the new rules may hurt growth and spur lenders to quit the country, the Sunday Telegraph reported.

Cameron told senior cabinet officials that any proposals from the Independent Commission on Banking to split banks’ retail and investment units or require lenders to raise capital must be reviewed, the newspaper reported, citing unidentified officials. The government is concerned that HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA) and possibly other banks may move operations away from the U.K. if planned “ring-fencing” rules are implemented, according to the Sunday Telegraph.

With respect to liquidity, here’s a report from the front lines:

Banks are seeking to retain their liquidity, making interbank lending more difficult, as funding from money and capital markets becomes harder to obtain, ABN Amro Group NV Chief Executive Officer Gerrit Zalm said.

Interbank borrowing for more than six months is also becoming problematic because banks are reluctant to lend to competitors with “big positions in weaker countries’ debt, for instance,” he said today on Dutch television program “Buitenhof.”

A demise of the euro would have “catastrophic” consequences for the Dutch economy, which sends about three- fourths of its exports to other euro-zone states, and “would cause a recession that would make the 1930s a trifle by comparison,” Zalm said.

Europe is getting more interesting by the day:

Finland is stepping up efforts to find a compromise with Europe on its collateral demands amid International Monetary Fund opposition to forcing Greece to give euro members extra security for new loans.

Europe’s efforts to contain its debt crisis risk unraveling as individual nations’ demands for collateral, Greece’s deteriorating economic predicament and wavering commitment to austerity packages from euro members such as Italy throw any recovery in doubt.

Finland’s anti-bailout party, which calls itself “The Finns,” last month polled as the country’s most popular, according to broadcaster YLE. The party saw its backing surge fourfold in the April election, making it parliament’s third- biggest. The party’s leader Timo Soini has railed against the costs of funding bailouts and rejects Europe’s ambition of preventing a Greek default.

“The European Union is breaking its own rules and Finland shouldn’t have anything to do with it,” Soini said last week. “This is a disaster. Finland should stay outside and oppose these measures.”

The Finns aren’t the only ones opposing a bail-out:

The Social Democrats, Germany’s main opposition party, took 36.1 percent to win yesterday’s election in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, while Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union had 23.3 percent, ZDF television projections showed. The result in the eastern state where Merkel’s election district is located means her national coalition has been defeated or lost votes in all six German state elections so far this year as voters resist her bid to prevent a euro-region breakup by putting more taxpayer money on the line for bailouts.

“Merkel’s CDU got beat in her home state, adding to the sense that opposition to any solution to a deepening crisis is growing,” Sebastien Galy, a senior foreign-exchange strategist at Societe Generale SA in London, wrote in an e-mailed note.

Ackerman had some cheerful things to say about the markets:

The chief executive officer of Deutsche Bank AG (DBK), Josef Ackermann, said market conditions remind him of late 2008, and urged lawmakers to act to avoid a repeat of the financial crisis, which spawned the worst global recession since the Great Depression. Investors drove yields higher on the bonds of Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy yesterday on doubts Europe’s leaders will be able to stop the sovereign debt contagion.

The Bloomberg Europe Banks and Financial Services Index of 46 stocks dropped almost 10 percent in the past two sessions, to the lowest level since March 31, 2009. The Markit iTraxx Financial Index linked to senior debt of 25 banks and insurers soared 13 basis points to 259, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. The difference between the three-month euro interbank offered rate, or Euribor, and the overnight indexed swap rate, a measure of banks’ reluctance to lend to each other, rose to 0.77 percentage point, the widest gap since April 2009.

Many European banks “obviously” wouldn’t be able to shoulder writedowns on sovereign debt held in their banking books based on market values, Ackermann said. Greek two-year notes traded yesterday at less than 50 percent of face value.

However, Greece is going to accellerate its reforms, so everything will be all right. Just don’t panic, OK! Dear God, don’t panic! STOP PANICKING THIS MINUTE, YOU NASTY SPECULATORS!:

Greece said it will accelerate austerity measures pledged in return for international financing as pressure mounted from European partners before the payment of a sixth tranche of bailout loans.

“Greece isn’t a pariah in the European Union or an open wound,” Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos said from Athens on state-run NET Radio today. “Greece is an equal member of the European Union with deficit and debt problems. Greece can overcome these problems with these reforms.”

Venizelos said he received approval from the Cabinet today to immediately transfer state assets to a special fund for sale, place civil servants in a “reserve” system to retrain them and cut expenses, as well as merge and shut down dozens of government agencies that are a drag on spending.

Ackerman was also in the news for the latest IIF counter-attack against excessive regulation:

The study includes a series of scenarios and a considerable number of variables in determining the impact of the sum of financial regulatory measures. It estimated that all the measures combined will significantly boost the capital needs of banks relative to a base scenario – an additional capital requirement for banks in the leading industrial economies of $1.3 trillion by 2015, according to its central scenario, and this could push bank lending rates up by over 3 ½ percentage points on average for the next five years. The result could be 3.2 percent lower output by 2015 in these economies than would otherwise be the case. This would lead to about 7.5 million fewer jobs being created. The negative economic effects would likely fade in 2016 and beyond but, the maximum drag of reform on the global economy would be at a time when it is apparently least well placed to handle it.

Naturally, the regulators immediately countered:

Group of Seven finance ministers and central bankers will discuss financial regulation at a meeting Friday in Marseille, a Canadian Finance Department official told reporters Tuesday on a conference call.

The official said overly indebted countries in Europe and overly indebted households in the U.S. are the more important headwinds facing the global economy. Canada is relatively pleased with the progress the G20 is making on completing its regulatory program, and Finance is dismissive of the argument that demanding the banks to keep bigger financial cushions is hurting the economy.

If we had better financial regulation in 2007 and 2008, we might not be in the situation we are in now, the Canadian official said.

And if it rained lemonade we could all have a nice drink. So?

I believe that they’re probably both right: all else being equal, increased regulation on the contemplated scale will cause a depression, and that the IIF is being alarmist. I believe this because all else is not equal and never is. What is far more likely is that the banks, constrained by capital requirements, will simply reduce their lending business and there will be an increasing amount of disintermediation as corporations and governments go directly to the public markets. They might lend to small business, but they might also face increased competition in that sector from unregulated shadow banks.

So what will this lead to? It will lead to an ostensibly safer, but far more brittle financial system. Manulife got into trouble during the crisis, but were able to pump a huge amount of capital into their operating subsidiary on very short notice because the holdco was able to borrow billions from the banks on short notice. BofA was able to take over Merrill Lynch on short notice.

If capital regulation leads to lower bank flexibility in a crisis, watch out! We’ve all seen what a mess the politicians make of things when they make up new rules on the fly. It won’t be pretty.

YLO’s CFO has “stepped down”. That was sudden. There were no insider trading reports for YLO on SEDI today. Interestingly – and perhaps related to the hasty departure? – there was no insider trading of the preferreds reported by the TMX today either.

HSB is selling its Canadian retail brokerage:

As HSBC Holdings PLC (HCS-N26.440.100.38%) looks to shed costs from its global operations, the bank acknowledged it is in talks to sell part of its Canadian operations, but said a deal has not yet been reached.

After reports two weeks ago that the U.K.-based bank had opened the books on its Canadian retail brokerage to potential bidders, HSBC issued a statement Tuesday confirming the process. However, “no decision has yet been made to proceed with any transaction,” the bank said.

DBRS confirmed IGM on Friday:

DBRS has today confirmed the Unsecured Debentures rating of IGM Financial Inc. (IGM or the Company) at A (high) and the First Preferred Shares rating at Pfd-2 (high); the trends are Stable. IGM is one of the most consistently profitable financial services companies in Canada, reflecting a leading market position in the mutual fund manufacturing and distribution market through the operations of both Investors Group Inc. (IG) and Mackenzie Financial Corporation (Mackenzie). The rating is primarily based on the profitability, operating cash flow and business strengths of the Company’s IG subsidiary, while recognizing the complementary positive contribution of diverse products, brands and distribution channels offered through the Company’s Mackenzie and Investment Planning Counsel Inc. (IPC) business segments.

In addition to strong profitability, the Company’s credit rating also benefits from strong cash flows, which easily cover the upfront distribution costs of mutual fund sales; strong liquidity; and a conservative financial profile. Debt plus preferred shares-to-EBITDA was less than one time which is very conservative and a sharp improvement from year ago levels following a large debt maturity and growth in retained earnings. Over the past 12 months, the Company’s ratio of debt plus preferred shares-to-total capitalization fell from 29.1% to 25.7%, which remains appropriate for the rating.

DBRS also confirmed twenty-two SplitShares:

The Preferred Shares were last confirmed in August 2010. Equity performance was generally positive from July 31, 2010, to March 31, 2011; however, net asset values (NAVs) dropped over the past few months as global equity markets were negatively affected by concerns over the European sovereign debt crisis and the U.S. debt ceiling deadline. High volatility levels intensified following the downgrade of the U.S. long-term debt rating below AAA by one major rating agency. Notwithstanding the current volatility and sharp drop in markets over the past few months, the current levels of protection available to the Preferred Shares are commensurate with the ratings assigned. The rating confirmations are also based on longer-term performance and structural features of the Issuers that benefit the Preferred Shares. Other key rating factors are the credit quality and diversification of each Portfolio; the amount of distributions paid to the Capital Shares; and the expected maturity date of the Preferred Shares of each Issuer.

Frankly, I’m a little surprised at some of the names in the confirmation list! FFN.PR.A still at Pfd-3(low)? NAVPU was only 13.10 at August 31, presumably a little less now. When it was last confirmed 2010-8-10 the NAVPU was 13.73.

Today’s red-hot investment idea is: buy stock in producers of mosquite repellant and producers of anti-mosquite-borne-disease drugs. Our beloved morons on Toronto City Council have decreed mandatory downspout disconnection, so today I finally got around to booking an appointment with a contractor who can do it without injuring himself or toppling the house over, like I would. I was told that a lot of people aren’t redirecting their downspouts, they’re just capping them – so (a) the eavestroughs will just overflow when full and (b) we’re going to have a lot of standing water in the future. It’s interesting to note the similarity to what I believe will be the unintended consequences of increased bank capital regulation, and the fact that regulators, in general, are incapable of thinking things through; but the situation does suggest my red-hot investment idea. Never say I don’t do enough for you guys!

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts winning 20bp FixedResets losing 3bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 7bp. Not much volatility. Volume was abysmal.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.3806 % 2,150.0
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.3806 % 3,233.5
Floater 3.01 % 3.35 % 58,687 18.80 3 -0.3806 % 2,321.4
OpRet 4.82 % 2.92 % 66,787 1.66 8 -0.0290 % 2,446.9
SplitShare 5.38 % 0.07 % 55,236 0.48 4 -0.0727 % 2,493.1
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0290 % 2,237.5
Perpetual-Premium 5.63 % 4.80 % 127,929 1.10 16 -0.0296 % 2,110.6
Perpetual-Discount 5.29 % 5.37 % 127,152 14.82 14 0.2010 % 2,245.1
FixedReset 5.15 % 3.15 % 212,765 2.68 59 -0.0257 % 2,327.1
Deemed-Retractible 5.05 % 4.62 % 249,887 5.95 46 0.0725 % 2,193.9
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
POW.PR.A Perpetual-Premium -1.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-06
Maturity Price : 24.85
Evaluated at bid price : 25.06
Bid-YTW : 5.67 %
BAM.PR.K Floater -1.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-06
Maturity Price : 15.75
Evaluated at bid price : 15.75
Bid-YTW : 3.37 %
BAM.PR.X FixedReset -1.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-06
Maturity Price : 22.78
Evaluated at bid price : 24.11
Bid-YTW : 3.70 %
IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 1.32 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.00
Bid-YTW : 5.62 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
IFC.PR.A FixedReset 61,890 RBC bought blocks of 11,800 and 10,600 from Nesbitt, both at 24.95.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.97
Bid-YTW : 3.95 %
BNS.PR.R FixedReset 54,195 RBC crossed 50,000 at 25.13.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.11
Bid-YTW : 3.26 %
TD.PR.I FixedReset 41,645 RBC crossed 40,000 at 27.44.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.39
Bid-YTW : 3.03 %
IFC.PR.C FixedReset 28,550 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 4.19 %
RY.PR.W Perpetual-Discount 20,530 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-06
Maturity Price : 24.38
Evaluated at bid price : 24.71
Bid-YTW : 4.98 %
BNS.PR.N Deemed-Retractible 18,461 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-28
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 26.02
Bid-YTW : 4.70 %
There were 14 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.J OpRet Quote: 26.40 – 27.23
Spot Rate : 0.8300
Average : 0.6233

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2018-03-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.40
Bid-YTW : 4.61 %

CM.PR.P Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.54 – 26.00
Spot Rate : 0.4600
Average : 0.3050

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-10-29
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.54
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %

POW.PR.A Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.06 – 25.40
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2205

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-06
Maturity Price : 24.85
Evaluated at bid price : 25.06
Bid-YTW : 5.67 %

CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Quote: 23.51 – 23.99
Spot Rate : 0.4800
Average : 0.3662

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-06
Maturity Price : 23.06
Evaluated at bid price : 23.51
Bid-YTW : 4.90 %

GWO.PR.I Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.48 – 22.78
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.1919

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.48
Bid-YTW : 5.80 %

RY.PR.H Deemed-Retractible Quote: 26.57 – 27.00
Spot Rate : 0.4300
Average : 0.3339

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-05-24
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.57
Bid-YTW : 4.22 %

Issue Comments

PDV.PR.A To Vote on Term Extension

Prime Dividend Corp. has announced (although not yet on their website):

that a special meeting of the holders of the Company’s Preferred Shares and Class A Shares will be held at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern standard time) on Thursday, November 3, 2011. The purpose of the meeting is to consider a special resolution to extend the mandatory termination date for the Company from December 1, 2012 to December 1, 2018. Shareholders of record at the close of business on September 29, 2011 will be provided with the notice of meeting and management information circular in respect of the meeting and will be entitled to vote at the meeting.

If the extension is approved, Class A Shareholders and Preferred Shareholders will be provided with a Special Retraction right which is designed to provide Shareholders with an opportunity to retract their Shares and receive a retraction price that is calculated in the same way that such price would be calculated if the Company were to terminate on December 1, 2012 as originally contemplated.

PDV.PR.A was last mentioned on PrefBlog in August 2009. PDV.PR.A is not tracked by HIMIPref™ – the issue size is simply too small.

Market Action

September 2, 2011

The SEC has a new policy: Prove you’re not a crook!:

U.S. securities regulators have taken the unprecedented step of asking high-frequency trading firms to hand over the details of their trading strategies, and in some cases, their secret computer codes.

The requests for proprietary code and algorithm parameters by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), a Wall Street brokerage regulator, are part of investigations into suspicious market activity, said Tom Gira, executive vice president of FINRA’s market regulation unit.

“It’s not a fishing expedition or educational exercise. It’s because there’s something that’s troubling us in the marketplace,” he said in an interview.

It has alarmed some traders who are afraid their “secret sauce” — intellectual property sometimes developed over years and at great cost — could get into the wrong hands, especially when SEC and FINRA examiners leave for the private sector.

Having the code and insider knowledge of what works and what doesn’t will help the employment prospects of regulatory personnel, which is of course the whole purpose of regulation.

Now that the IMF and the ECB hold a lot of Greek bonds, there’s unprecedented concern about bondholder rights:

The International Monetary Fund opposes European plans to force Greece to put up collateral in its second rescue, said four people with direct knowledge of the matter.

The use of collateral, a concession to win Finland’s backing for 109 billion euros ($155 billion) of loans pledged by euro leaders in July, would deny the IMF priority creditor status and violate Greek bondholders’ rights, said the people, who declined to be named because the talks are in progress.

IMF objections threaten to snag Europe’s crisis-management effort after aid of 256 billion euros for Greece, Ireland and Portugal failed to restore order.

Greece’s predicament deepened today with the forecast of a worsening economic contraction and a two-week suspension of a European-IMF economic review mission to give the government time to plot a pro-growth course. Two-year Greek yields rose today above 47 percent, a euro-era record.

Banking in the US is more interesting than in Canada:

Mortgage rates near historic lows have sparked a refinancing boom that has U.S. lenders struggling to handle the surge.

The lending logjam extends to the nation’s biggest banks, which fired thousands of mortgage workers after interest rates rose in November through February, chilling refinancing demand. Now, the time needed to close a loan has as much as doubled to 60 days, according to Wilson and other bankers, and lenders are holding some mortgage rates higher than they could be to slow the torrent of customers, data show.

Refinancing applications are up 83 percent from this year’s low in February, according to an index compiled by the Mortgage Bankers Association, a Washington-based trade group. After topping 5 percent that month, the average rate on 30-year fixed loans fell two weeks ago to 4.15 percent, the lowest in surveys dating back to 1971 by Freddie Mac, the second-largest U.S. mortgage-finance company.

How about a double dip?

The Labor Department said U.S. payrolls were unchanged last month, the weakest reading since September 2010 and worse than the median economist forecast that called for growth of 65,000. Stocks sank and Treasuries surged in August as investors bet that the odds of a recession had increased. Markets reversed course toward the end of the month amid speculation the Federal Reserve would act to spur growth.

There’s more!

Bearish bets against the S&P 500 rose to a nine-month high as short sellers increased speculation stocks may decline. The proportion of S&P 500 shares outstanding sold short on Aug. 29 rose to 3.03 percent, the most since the end of November and up from 2.37 percent at the beginning of August, according to New York-based Data Explorers, which provides research on short sales and stock lending. Short selling of the gauge reached a three-year high of 5.52 percent in August 2008, before the index sank to a 12-year low in March 2009.

The yield curve, or the difference between two- and 30-year Treasury debt, narrowed to 312 basis points, the least in a year, as the jobless data bolstered the view that Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke will be inclined to take addition steps beyond the two previous rounds of debt buying, known as quantitative easing, or QE.

and even more!

Treasuries rose, pushing 10-year note yields below 2 percent, as the government’s payrolls report showed no jobs were added in August, stoking speculation that the Federal Reserve will increase its purchases of longer- maturity debt.

U.S. 30-year yields fell to the lowest in since January 2009 as U.S. employment data were the weakest reading since September 2010.

The 10-year note yield fell 14 basis points, or 0.14 percentage point, to 1.99 percent at 5 p.m. in New York, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader prices. The price of the 2.125 percent security maturing in August 2021 rose 1 9/32, or $12.81 per $1,000 face amount, to 101 8/32. The yield touched 1.9806 percent.

Thirty-year bond yields fell 20 basis points to 3.30 percent and two-year note yields rose two basis points to 0.20 percent.

20bp on thirty-year paper? That’s like about maybe three bucks on price!

I think that at some point the regulators are going to have to do something about the more patronizing manipulation rules, by which I mean “repeal”. Tony Ianno got in trouble for high-closing:

In agreeing to the settlement, he now faces a range of sanctions from the regulator, including a five-year cease trading order that only allows him to conduct limited trading through his Registered Retirement Savings Plan.

He also faces a five-year ban on serving as a director or officer of a publicly-traded company and is also prohibited from serving as a company promoter during that time.

Additionally, Mr. Ianno has agreed to pay $50,000 toward the costs of the OSC investigation in addition to another voluntary payment of $50,000, OSC Senior Litigation Counsel Alexandra Clark Alexandra Clark told the hearing

I’m glad the extra $50,000 was voluntary, and not extorted from him or anything like that.

In March 2010, the OSC alleged the one-time parliamentarian broke securities laws by artificially inflating the share price of Covalon Technologies Ltd., a junior biotechnology firm. Mr. Ianno had purchased roughly 4 million of Covalon’s common shares in transactions worth $7.6-million at various times in 2007 and 2008.

The OSC has said the lion’s share of Mr. Ianno’s share purchases were made on margin, meaning they were purchased using credit provided by various brokerage firms. Those loans were then secured against the value of the shares.

According to the OSC’s original statement of allegations, Mr. Ianno purportedly engaged in inappropriate trading of Covalon shares as he faced some 27 margin calls from eight different brokerages.

Specifically, he was accused of making frequent end-of-day purchases through multiple brokerage accounts that often resulted in increases in Covalon’s stock price.

Well, the “multiple brokerage accounts” part is something of a red flag, but high-closing was always hard to police and nowadays it’s getting worse. You can expect professionals to know the rules, but now there are hundreds of thousands of retail guys with market access that’s only very lightly filtered.

High closing has no effect on the valuation of the stock and no effect on the long-term price of the stock. By taking it so seriously, the regulators are pandering to momentum players when in fact their efforts should be directed towards protecting value investors. If you want to do something about high closing, then (a) stop using closing prices for margin and valuation purposes and use the closing quote and (b) give retail access to algorithms so that if somebody puts in a high bid at 3:59:55, there’s a good chance it will be executed at 3:59:55.015

There were no new fillings on the YLO MTN buyback today, but the usual basket of preferred shares was reported by the TMX as insider purchases. There has been no response from the company to my inquiry regarding their apparent exceeding of the maximum annual limit on their NCIB.

The Canadian preferred share market was fairly quiet in advance of the long weekend, with PerpetualDiscounts up 2bp, FixedResets down 1bp and DeemedRetractibles winning 8bp. Volatility was low. Volume was almost non-existent.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2089 % 2,158.2
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2089 % 3,245.9
Floater 3.00 % 3.32 % 58,582 18.86 3 -0.2089 % 2,330.3
OpRet 4.82 % 2.93 % 67,825 1.68 8 0.2226 % 2,447.6
SplitShare 5.37 % 0.07 % 57,519 0.49 4 -0.1555 % 2,494.9
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.2226 % 2,238.1
Perpetual-Premium 5.63 % 4.75 % 129,009 1.11 16 0.0406 % 2,111.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.30 % 5.37 % 106,732 14.82 14 0.0150 % 2,240.6
FixedReset 5.15 % 3.14 % 214,693 2.66 59 -0.0129 % 2,327.7
Deemed-Retractible 5.06 % 4.67 % 252,635 7.89 46 0.0822 % 2,192.3
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
HSB.PR.C Deemed-Retractible -1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.06
Bid-YTW : 5.21 %
ELF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-02
Maturity Price : 22.84
Evaluated at bid price : 23.13
Bid-YTW : 5.81 %
BMO.PR.K Deemed-Retractible 1.43 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-11-25
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : 4.29 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
RY.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 66,626 RBC crossed 50,000 at 24.97.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.95
Bid-YTW : 4.51 %
RY.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 57,951 RBC crossed 50,000 at 24.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.75
Bid-YTW : 4.66 %
IFC.PR.C FixedReset 42,275 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.03
Bid-YTW : 4.23 %
CM.PR.J Deemed-Retractible 34,765 National crossed 20,000 at 25.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.02
Bid-YTW : 4.56 %
SLF.PR.H FixedReset 34,400 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 3.98 %
SLF.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 33,180 Desjardins crossed 16,000 at 21.90; Scotia crossed 10,000 at 21.89.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.88
Bid-YTW : 6.07 %
There were 13 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.R FixedReset Quote: 25.61 – 25.96
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2638

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-02
Maturity Price : 23.36
Evaluated at bid price : 25.61
Bid-YTW : 4.10 %

BAM.PR.J OpRet Quote: 26.50 – 26.98
Spot Rate : 0.4800
Average : 0.3967

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2018-03-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.50
Bid-YTW : 4.53 %

HSB.PR.C Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.06 – 25.31
Spot Rate : 0.2500
Average : 0.1823

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.06
Bid-YTW : 5.21 %

PWF.PR.O Perpetual-Premium Quote: 25.64 – 26.00
Spot Rate : 0.3600
Average : 0.2939

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-10-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.64
Bid-YTW : 5.49 %

BNS.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 24.90 – 25.44
Spot Rate : 0.5400
Average : 0.4776

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.90
Bid-YTW : 3.41 %

TRP.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 25.87 – 26.17
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2379

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-02
Maturity Price : 23.47
Evaluated at bid price : 25.87
Bid-YTW : 3.14 %

Issue Comments

BPO.PR.R Settles Firm on Respectable Volume

Brookfield Office Properties has announced:

the completion of its previously announced Preferred Shares, Series R issue in the amount of C$250 million. The offering was underwritten by a syndicate led by RBC Capital Markets, CIBC, Scotia Capital Inc. and TD Securities Inc.

Brookfield Office Properties issued 10.0 million Preferred Shares, Series R at a price of C$25.00 per share yielding 5.10% per annum for the initial five-year period ending September 30, 2016. Net proceeds from the issue will be added to the general funds of Brookfield Office Properties and be used for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, the repayment or refinancing of debt, acquisitions, capital expenditures and working capital needs.

The Preferred Shares, Series R will commence trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange on September 2, 2011 under the ticker symbol BPO.PR.R.

BPO.PR.R is a 5.10%+348 FixedReset, announced August 25. It will be tracked by HIMIPref™ but relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

The issue traded 279,850 shares today in a relatively wide range of 24.70-05 before closing at 24.95-99, 5×25. Vital statistics are:

BPO.PR.R FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-02
Maturity Price : 23.14
Evaluated at bid price : 24.95
Bid-YTW : 5.04 %
Market Action

September 1, 2011

The goose that laid the golden eggs is looking a little green around the gills:

Banks in Europe are exploring ways to cut costs by routing more of their trades and other business through overseas subsidiaries, a plan that may shift tax revenue away from London and loosen European regulators’ influence over the lenders.

Banks could record as much as 30 percent of the value of their trades through Hong Kong, Singapore and other jurisdictions instead of hubs such as London and New York without running into trouble with regulators, Matten said. Such a move would hurt traditional hubs such as London because assets are treated for tax and regulatory purposes in the country where they are booked. It would also allow banks to sidestep the U.K. bank levy, introduced last year to raise 2.5 billion pounds ($4.1 billion) from lenders operating in Britain, as well as any financial transaction tax imposed by the European Union.

Haresh Sapra, professor of accounting at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, writes an interesting piece on Bloomberg titled More Transparency May Hurt Markets:

Standard setters have argued that fair-value accounting would alleviate information asymmetry between insiders and outsiders. Yet insiders of many financial institutions have complained that rather than enhancing market discipline, fair- value accounting would introduce volatility into their reported numbers, thereby inducing suboptimal decisions.

The recent financial crisis is a case in point. When liquidity started drying up, some banks began to sell their illiquid loans, putting downward pressure on prices. Anticipating the fall in prices, other banks started selling their loans and prices declined further, leading more banks to sell their loans. The effects were so severe that prices no longer reflected fundamentals but rather the amount of cash or liquidity available to buyers in the market.

If information asymmetry were the only friction between insiders and outsiders, the feedback effect would be weak or even nonexistent and prices would play their proper role of providing market discipline. But in strategic environments with multiple imperfections, market participants who try to extract the informational content of current prices distort this very content by adding an extra, nonfundamental component to price fluctuations.

As a result, the choice of an appropriate measurement regime amounts to a dilemma between ignoring price signals — as one would in a historical-cost regime — and relying on their degraded versions, as would be done in a fair-value regime.

Fabulous Fab, the man being persecuted by the SEC for acting as a broker, is in the news again:

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) trader Fabrice Tourre, accused of misleading investors in a collateralized debt obligation, said in a court filing that IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG (IKB)’s alleged $150 million investment was actually made by two Jersey-based companies.

Tourre wants to take testimony of witnesses at Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 29 Ltd. and Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 30 Ltd., according to the filing yesterday in federal court in Manhattan. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has said Duesseldorf, Germany-based IKB made the investment in the CDO, Abacus 2007-AC1.

“Discovery in this matter thus far has shown, however, that IKB’s alleged $150 million investment was, in fact, made by” the Jersey-based companies, Tourre’s lawyers wrote in the filing.

“I think what they’re trying to establish here is they have sophistication piled on top of sophistication to show that this was a well-reasoned investment by, yet again, a sophisticated institution,” Jacob S. Frenkel, a former Securities and Exchange Commission lawyer now in private practice in Potomac, Maryland, said in a phone interview today.

The Canadian preferred share market started the month on a happy note, with PerpetualDiscounts winning 25bp, FixedResets up 21bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 6bp. Volatility was a little bit better than usual, skewed towards positive returns. Volume was low.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1069 % 2,162.7
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1069 % 3,252.7
Floater 2.80 % 2.54 % 24,854 20.95 4 0.1069 % 2,335.1
OpRet 4.89 % 2.88 % 65,988 0.16 9 -0.1119 % 2,442.2
SplitShare 5.37 % 0.07 % 58,137 0.49 4 0.0104 % 2,498.8
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1119 % 2,233.2
Perpetual-Premium 5.65 % 4.76 % 130,690 0.65 14 0.0605 % 2,110.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.33 % 5.37 % 98,408 14.76 16 0.2482 % 2,240.3
FixedReset 5.13 % 3.14 % 207,725 2.66 60 0.2063 % 2,328.0
Deemed-Retractible 5.06 % 4.68 % 260,969 7.99 46 0.0569 % 2,190.5
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.O OpRet -1.70 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.46
Bid-YTW : 4.47 %
GWO.PR.G Deemed-Retractible -1.32 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.72
Bid-YTW : 5.32 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset 1.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 3.41 %
TRI.PR.B Floater 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-01
Maturity Price : 22.01
Evaluated at bid price : 22.25
Bid-YTW : 2.35 %
HSB.PR.C Deemed-Retractible 1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.34
Bid-YTW : 5.07 %
GWO.PR.J FixedReset 1.36 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.86
Bid-YTW : 2.50 %
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.51 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-01
Maturity Price : 23.05
Evaluated at bid price : 23.50
Bid-YTW : 4.90 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 1.56 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-01
Maturity Price : 23.58
Evaluated at bid price : 26.00
Bid-YTW : 2.96 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
IFC.PR.C FixedReset 134,028 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 4.26 %
SLF.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 104,896 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 21.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.91
Bid-YTW : 6.05 %
MFC.PR.D FixedReset 62,816 Nesbitt crossed 49,300 at 27.05.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.14
Bid-YTW : 3.29 %
RY.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 53,320 Nesbitt crossed 14,000 at 24.94; RBC crossed 10,000 at 24.96.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.91
Bid-YTW : 4.53 %
TD.PR.K FixedReset 43,096 Scotia crossed 25,000 at 27.35.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.33
Bid-YTW : 3.10 %
SLF.PR.H FixedReset 35,900 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.79
Bid-YTW : 3.99 %
There were 21 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 20.75 – 22.15
Spot Rate : 1.4000
Average : 1.1897

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-01
Maturity Price : 20.75
Evaluated at bid price : 20.75
Bid-YTW : 2.54 %

GWO.PR.G Deemed-Retractible Quote: 24.72 – 25.16
Spot Rate : 0.4400
Average : 0.3230

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.72
Bid-YTW : 5.32 %

NA.PR.N FixedReset Quote: 26.02 – 26.55
Spot Rate : 0.5300
Average : 0.4222

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-08-15
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.02
Bid-YTW : 3.36 %

BAM.PR.O OpRet Quote: 25.46 – 25.95
Spot Rate : 0.4900
Average : 0.3891

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.46
Bid-YTW : 4.47 %

BMO.PR.Q FixedReset Quote: 25.21 – 25.49
Spot Rate : 0.2800
Average : 0.1866

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.21
Bid-YTW : 3.27 %

CIU.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 25.01 – 25.49
Spot Rate : 0.4800
Average : 0.4065

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-09-01
Maturity Price : 23.18
Evaluated at bid price : 25.01
Bid-YTW : 3.02 %

Issue Comments

YLO Discloses August Preferred Share BuyBacks

Details from SEDI.

Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB) information from YLO Press Release 2011-5-11.

YLO Preferred Share NCIB
Issue Month Shares Total Paid Total PV Average Price
YLO.PR.A May 82,435 1,947,561 2,060,875 23.63
June 634,663 14,593,162 15,866,575 22.99
July 56,588 1,285,669 1,414,700 22.72
Aug. 459,262 7,670,789 11,481,550 16.70
Issue Total
(NCIB Max)
1,232,948
(1,127,882)
25,497,180 30,823,700 20.68
YLO.PR.B May 218,798 3,625,189 5,469,950 16.57
June 318,980 5,194,575 7,974,500 16.28
July 19,670 302,641 491,750 15.39
Aug. 214,440 2,144,827 5,361,000 10.00
Issue Total
(NCIB Max)
771,888
(684,028)
11,267,233 19,297,200 14.60
YLO.PR.D May 16,180 335,026 404,500 20.71
June 23,735 389,664 593,375 16.42
July 9,695 148,694 242,375 15.34
Aug. 27,700 316,971 692,500 11.44
Issue Total
(NCIB Max)
77,310
(500,000)
1,190,354 1,932,750 15.40
YLO.PR.C May 36,280 740,963 907,000 20.42
June 54,052 869,827 1,351,300 16.09
July 21,340 326,336 533,500 15.29
Aug. 61,292 698,142 1,523,300 11.39
Issue Total
(NCIB Max)
172,964
(830,000)
2,635,268 4,324,100 15.24
Grand Total 2,255,110 40,590,036 56,377,750 18.00

As pointed out by Assiduous Reader radamesb, it appears that the company has reached – and even gone beyond! – its NCIB limit for the two retractibles; it looks like any further purchases of YLO.PR.A and YLO.PR.B will have to be done by public tender (such as was done for the NA high-coupon FixedResets, but – heh-heh – with a lower price).

However, the Exchange reports the usual batch of 3,134 insider buys today, so I’m not sure what’s going on. Anybody who knows the rules better than I do – or can shake an answer out of YLO Investor Relations – may enlighten me in the comments.

Market Action

August 31, 2011

Yesterday I reported on the optimistic accounting at BNP Paribas. The Danes are cracking down on optimism:

The Financial Supervisory Authority will restrict the flexibility it gives banks to calculate writedowns under international financial reporting standards, FSA Director General Ulrik Noedgaard said in an interview in Copenhagen. The regulator wants to curb “an optimistic approach” to writedowns displayed by some banks, he said.

Amagerbanken A/S and Fjordbank Mors A/S collapsed this year after the FSA told the two regional lenders to write down 1.9 billion kroner ($371 million) more in property and farming loans than stated in their accounts. The insolvencies triggered the European Union’s first senior creditor losses within a resolution framework, and prompted Moody’s Investors Service in May to downgrade six Danish banks, including Danske Bank A/S, the country’s biggest. Proper accounting could have helped deal with the losses in a less disruptive way, Noedgaard said.

This one will drive the slogan-chanters nuts:

Standard & Poor’s is giving a higher rating to securities backed by subprime home loans, the same type of investments that led to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, than it assigns the U.S. government.

S&P is poised to provide AAA grades to 59 percent of Springleaf Mortgage Loan Trust 2011-1, a set of bonds tied to $497 million lent to homeowners with below-average credit scores and almost no equity in their properties. New York-based S&P stripped the U.S. of its top rank on Aug. 5, saying Washington politics were making the country less creditworthy.

S&P has awarded AAAs to more than $36 billion of securities in the U.S. this year that were created by bankers who continue to gather thousands of loans, bundle them into bonds of varying risk and pay ratings firms a fee to assign credit rankings.

The ambulance-chasers are after Sino-Forest … and anybody else they can blame for their investment:

Sino-Forest Corp. (TRE-T4.81—-%), the TSX-listed Chinese forestry company whose shares have collapsed following fraud allegations, repeatedly misrepresented its financial statements, backdated stock options and engaged in unusual and undisclosed related-party transactions, according to fresh allegations levelled in a proposed class-action lawsuit seeking more than $7-billion in damages.

The notice of action, filed on behalf of a group of Sino-Forest shareholders who purchased shares in various offerings between 2007 and 2011, is seeking more than $6.5-billion in damages from Sino-Forest, its top management, directors, and auditors Ernst & Young LLP, as well as the Beijing office of Pöyry Consulting Co. Ltd., which published reports about the size and value of the company’s forestry assets.

A host of investment banks … that underwrote Sino-Forest’s equity offerings were also named as proposed defendants in the action, which seeks an additional $824-million related to the stock sales.

Say what you like about US Republicans, they’re rugged individualists who scorn government hand-outs:

When Texas billionaire Harold Simmons wanted to build a radioactive waste dump, one data point that would loom large in the permitting process wasn’t required on the application: He is a major donor to Governor Rick Perry.

Perry has a public record of rewarding his political donors with jobs and state contracts. He has appointed about 4,000 people — including many donors — to commissions, boards and other posts, according to Texans for Public Justice, an Austin- based, nonpartisan group that tracks state political donations.

The campaign to eliminate humour in the western world scored another victory:

The department store said in its statement: “We agree that the ‘Too pretty’ T-shirt does not deliver an appropriate message, and we have immediately discontinued its sale. Our merchandise is intended to appeal to a broad customer base, not to offend them.”

YLO did not file any Insider MTN purchases on SEDI today, but the Normal Course Issuer Bid for the preferreds continued – in fact, it appears that the company bought a block, as some insider (presumably the company) bought a block of 57,100 YLO.PR.B at 9.15, total value $522,465. The common traded somewhere north of 179-million shares on the month – about a third of the entire float, although a lot of that will be double-counted, what with day-traders and all.

The Canadian preferred share market closed the month on a mixed note, with PerpetualDiscounts losing 16bp, FixedResets up 2bp and DeemedRetractibles winning 18bp. Volatility was average. Volume was average.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.39%, equivalent to 7.01% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long Corporates now yield about 5.00%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (also called the seniority spread) is now 201bp, a tightening from the 210bp reported August 24 as yields converged slightly.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2134 % 2,160.4
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2134 % 3,249.2
Floater 2.81 % 2.54 % 25,740 20.95 4 -0.2134 % 2,332.7
OpRet 4.88 % 3.46 % 61,131 0.80 9 -0.1589 % 2,444.9
SplitShare 5.37 % 0.07 % 59,059 0.49 4 0.1295 % 2,498.5
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1589 % 2,235.7
Perpetual-Premium 5.66 % 4.80 % 131,628 0.65 14 -0.0829 % 2,109.1
Perpetual-Discount 5.34 % 5.39 % 109,784 14.74 16 -0.1565 % 2,234.7
FixedReset 5.14 % 3.16 % 210,341 2.67 60 0.0187 % 2,323.2
Deemed-Retractible 5.06 % 4.67 % 263,932 7.83 46 0.1797 % 2,189.3
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater -2.35 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-31
Maturity Price : 20.75
Evaluated at bid price : 20.75
Bid-YTW : 2.54 %
FTS.PR.C OpRet -1.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.86
Bid-YTW : -11.57 %
FTS.PR.E OpRet -1.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 26.51
Bid-YTW : 3.03 %
GWO.PR.L Deemed-Retractible 1.19 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.35
Bid-YTW : 5.45 %
IAG.PR.C FixedReset 1.20 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.00
Bid-YTW : 2.45 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
IFC.PR.C FixedReset 221,464 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.97
Bid-YTW : 4.28 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset 135,340 RBC crossed blocks of 80,000 and 50,000, both at 24.65.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 3.47 %
PWF.PR.M FixedReset 135,200 TD crossed 135,000 at 27.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.71
Bid-YTW : 3.27 %
SLF.PR.H FixedReset 126,045 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.73
Bid-YTW : 4.02 %
TD.PR.Q Deemed-Retractible 105,662 TD crossed 100,000 at 26.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-01-31
Maturity Price : 26.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.58
Bid-YTW : 4.09 %
MFC.PR.A OpRet 63,796 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 25.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2015-12-18
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.40
Bid-YTW : 3.66 %
There were 30 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater Quote: 20.75 – 22.00
Spot Rate : 1.2500
Average : 0.9591

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-31
Maturity Price : 20.75
Evaluated at bid price : 20.75
Bid-YTW : 2.54 %

CIU.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 25.00 – 25.49
Spot Rate : 0.4900
Average : 0.3258

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-31
Maturity Price : 23.18
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 3.02 %

FTS.PR.E OpRet Quote: 26.51 – 27.00
Spot Rate : 0.4900
Average : 0.3268

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-06-01
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 26.51
Bid-YTW : 3.03 %

MFC.PR.E FixedReset Quote: 26.33 – 26.73
Spot Rate : 0.4000
Average : 0.2468

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-09-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.33
Bid-YTW : 3.67 %

BAM.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 27.00 – 27.38
Spot Rate : 0.3800
Average : 0.2388

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.00
Bid-YTW : 4.64 %

BNS.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 24.85 – 25.49
Spot Rate : 0.6400
Average : 0.5289

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.85
Bid-YTW : 3.43 %

Issue Comments

ES.PR.B Redemption Date Confirmed

Scotia Managed Companies has announced:

The Board of Directors of Energy Split Corp. Inc. (the “Company”) today declared a return of capital distribution of $0.23625 per Class B Preferred Share payable on September 16, 2011 to holders of record at the close of business on September 15, 2011.
In addition, the Board of Directors of the Company has declared a capital gains distribution of $0.1700 per Capital Yield Share, payable on September 16, 2011 to holders of record at the close of business on September 15, 2011.

Holders of Class B Preferred Shares are entitled to receive quarterly fixed cumulative distributions equal to $0.23625 per Preferred Share. The Capital Yield Shareholders are provided with a leveraged play on the yield and price performance from a fixed portfolio consisting of 15 oil and gas royalty trusts listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The Company’s Capital Yield Share distribution policy is to pay a quarterly distribution on the Capital Yield Shares equal to the excess of the distributions received on the royalty trust portfolio minus the Class B Preferred Share distributions and all administrative and operating expenses provided the net asset value per Unit at the time of declaration, after giving effect to the distribution, would be greater than the original issue price of the Class B Preferred Shares.

The Capital Yield Shares and Class B Preferred Shares will be redeemed by the Company on September 16, 2011 in accordance with the redemption provisions as detailed in the prospectus dated September 7, 2006. Pursuant to these provisions, the Class B Preferred Shares will be redeemed at a price per share equal to the lesser of $21.00 and the Net Asset Value per Unit. The Capital Yield Shares will be redeemed at a price equal to the amount by which the Net Asset Value per Unit exceeds $21.00. The Net Asset Value per Unit was $37.74 as at August 30, 2011.

A further press release will be issued by the Company in connection with the redemption prices on September 15, 2011. Payment of the amounts due to holders of Capital Yield Shares and Class B Preferred Shares will be made by the Company on September 16, 2011.

Capital Yield Shares and Class B Preferred Shares of Energy Split Corp. Inc. are listed for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols ES and ES.PR.B respectively.

ES.PR.B was last mentioned on PrefBlog when it was upgraded to Pfd-3 by DBRS in April. ES.PR.B is not tracked by HIMIPref™.

Update 2011-9-15: Redemption Prices:

Redemption Price per Class B Preferred Share: $21.00
Redemption Price per Capital Yield Share: $15.19

Market Action

August 30, 2011

I sincerely hope that the banks have shot themselves in the foot:

The Bay Street firms that weren’t invited into the Maple Group plan to buy TMX Group Inc. (X-T39.94-0.42-1.04%) are lining up their options to ensure that competition and low-priced trading services remain should the deal to create a market-dominating company goes through.

The Maple plan would combine the two biggest players in the country in trading, and create a for-profit system to replace the current not-for-profit clearing system for shuttling cash between buyers and sellers of stocks after trades take place.

That’s why sources said some brokerages are already mulling the idea of starting a new trading system to compete in the business of matching stock buy-and-sell orders, and pushing regulators to adopt a strict cost control system for the clearing business based on the utility industry.

Eric Reguly of the Globe speculates that the LSE might come back with a new offer.

European debt problems are causing a little bit of what some might call hanky panky:

It appears that some companies are not following IAS 39 when determining whether the Greek government bonds that they classify as AFS are impaired. They are using the assessed impact on the present value of future cash flows arising from the proposed restructure of those bonds, rather than using the amount reflected by current market prices as required in IAS 39.

In addition, some companies holding Greek government bonds classified as AFS have stated that they are relying on internal valuation methodologies, rather than on market prices, to measure the fair value of the assets as at 30 June 2011. The reason generally given for using models rather than market prices is that the market for Greek government bonds is currently inactive (and therefore, in their view, does not provide reliable pricing information).

One bank pulling a fast one is BNP Paribas:

However, you wouldn’t normally discover government bonds in Level 3.

BNP Paribas’ argument seems to be that the market for Greek debt is now so illiquid that this accounting shift is justified. The bank explains its determination of fair value and what it counts as an ‘active’ market from page 23 of the full Q2 consolidated financial statements onwards.

Greek debt is hugely illiquid, but the price also reflects a market bet on a massive haircut at some point, and it has done for a while. The influence of Level 3 is in a way appropriate more than you’d think however, as it seems that mathematical modelling has been used during the construction of the Greece bond swap itself. Option 4′s valuation seems to depend on stochastic modelling in some way, for instance.

But for now we’ll just wonder if BNP’s Level 3 will be a guide to other banks taking their Greek impairments medicine…

On a brighter note, sovereign debt is sometimes upgraded:

Peru had its foreign debt rating raised one level by Standard & Poor’s, which said it expects recently elected President Ollanta Humala to continue policies that support the country’s economic expansion.

S&P raised Peru to BBB, the second-lowest investment grade, from BBB-. The outlook is stable. S&P also lifted Paraguay’s rating to BB-, three steps below investment grade, from B+, because an agreement with Brazil to boost its revenue share from a hydroelectric power plant has improved the country’s “fiscal flexibility.”

No new YLO MTN buy-backs but the Normal Course Issuer Bid for the preferreds is still being pursued vigorously, with the fund spending its usual $80,000+ today.

It was a good day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts up 7bp, FixedResets winning 17bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 9bp. Volatility was OK, with several BAM issues doing well. Volume was a little on the light side of average.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.7930 % 2,165.0
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.7930 % 3,256.2
Floater 2.80 % 2.48 % 26,019 21.12 4 0.7930 % 2,337.6
OpRet 4.88 % 3.68 % 59,362 0.81 9 0.1764 % 2,448.8
SplitShare 5.37 % 0.98 % 59,574 0.49 4 0.1456 % 2,495.3
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1764 % 2,239.2
Perpetual-Premium 5.65 % 4.49 % 127,866 1.12 14 0.1267 % 2,110.9
Perpetual-Discount 5.34 % 5.36 % 98,091 14.78 16 0.0679 % 2,238.2
FixedReset 5.14 % 3.19 % 212,000 2.67 60 0.1691 % 2,322.8
Deemed-Retractible 5.06 % 4.71 % 266,166 7.99 46 0.0893 % 2,185.3
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount -1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-30
Maturity Price : 24.02
Evaluated at bid price : 24.31
Bid-YTW : 5.05 %
BAM.PR.N Perpetual-Discount 1.31 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-30
Maturity Price : 22.01
Evaluated at bid price : 22.37
Bid-YTW : 5.38 %
BAM.PR.T FixedReset 1.37 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-30
Maturity Price : 22.90
Evaluated at bid price : 24.38
Bid-YTW : 4.16 %
BAM.PR.M Perpetual-Discount 2.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-30
Maturity Price : 22.11
Evaluated at bid price : 22.45
Bid-YTW : 5.36 %
IAG.PR.C FixedReset 2.03 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.68
Bid-YTW : 2.99 %
PWF.PR.A Floater 2.36 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-30
Maturity Price : 21.25
Evaluated at bid price : 21.25
Bid-YTW : 2.48 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
BNS.PR.N Deemed-Retractible 161,172 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 25.80 and two blocks of 35,000 each at the same price. RBC crossed 24,400 at the same price again.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-01-27
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.72
Bid-YTW : 4.77 %
BMO.PR.K Deemed-Retractible 109,343 Desjardins crossed 103,000 at 25.91.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-11-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.84
Bid-YTW : 4.56 %
MFC.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 83,844 TD crossed 75,400 at 22.05.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.14
Bid-YTW : 6.16 %
SLF.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 82,343 Desjardins crossed 25,000 at 21.77; TD crossed 50,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.85
Bid-YTW : 6.09 %
BNS.PR.P FixedReset 80,320 RBC crossed 17,000 at 25.90; Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-04-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.81
Bid-YTW : 3.26 %
IFC.PR.C FixedReset 57,155 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-09-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.95
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %
There were 29 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BNS.PR.Z FixedReset Quote: 24.86 – 25.45
Spot Rate : 0.5900
Average : 0.4071

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.86
Bid-YTW : 3.42 %

FTS.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 25.80 – 26.60
Spot Rate : 0.8000
Average : 0.6192

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-09-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.80
Bid-YTW : 3.59 %

FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.31 – 24.75
Spot Rate : 0.4400
Average : 0.3013

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-30
Maturity Price : 24.02
Evaluated at bid price : 24.31
Bid-YTW : 5.05 %

ELF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount Quote: 22.85 – 23.34
Spot Rate : 0.4900
Average : 0.3793

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-08-30
Maturity Price : 22.56
Evaluated at bid price : 22.85
Bid-YTW : 5.87 %

BAM.PR.I OpRet Quote: 25.42 – 25.98
Spot Rate : 0.5600
Average : 0.4738

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.42
Bid-YTW : 4.59 %

GWO.PR.J FixedReset Quote: 26.80 – 27.20
Spot Rate : 0.4000
Average : 0.3174

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-12-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.80
Bid-YTW : 3.24 %

Issue Comments

FCS.PR.B: Warrant Offering for Capital Unitholders

Faircourt Asset Management has announced:

that it has filed a final short form prospectus for an offering of warrants to unitholders of the Trust (the “Offering”). Each unitholder will receive one whole Series A warrant (each, a “Series A Warrant”) for each unit of the Trust (each, a “Unit”) on the record date of September 23, 2011.

Each Series A Warrant will entitle the holder thereof to purchase one Unit, one half of a 6.25% preferred security of the Trust (each, a “Preferred Security”) and one Series B warrant (each, a “Series B Warrant”) upon payment of the subscription price of $10.92 (which is the sum of (a) the most recently calculated NAV per Unit prior to the date of the preliminary short form prospectus, (b) $5.00 (which is one-half of the principal amount of a Preferred Security) and (c) the estimated per Unit fees and expenses of the Offering). The Series A Warrants may be exercised on a weekly basis every Friday commencing on September 30, 2011 and ending on December 2, 2011.

Each Series B Warrant will entitle the holder on and only on June 27, 2012 to subscribe for one Unit at the subscription price of $7.25. The Series B Warrants may be only exercised on June 27, 2012.

The TSX has conditionally approved this listing of the Series A Warrants distributed pursuant to the Offering, and the Units, Preferred Securities and Series B Warrants issuable upon the exercise thereof, on the TSX.

Successful completion of the Offering will (a) provide the Trust with additional capital that can be used to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities; (b) increase the trading liquidity of the Units; (c) reduce the leverage associated with the Preferred Securities of the Trust which has increased in recent years due to market conditions and the redemption of Units; (d) bring the Trust closer to achieving a matched position where the number of outstanding Units and Preferred Securities are equal; and (e) reduce the management expense ratio of the Trust.

Asset coverage for this issue has been a continuing matter of interest, with an unmatched retraction of capital units on June 30 being followed by a a matching redemption of preferred securities shortly afterwards. As with many other investment vehicles, the fund is now slightly behind where it was on May 31, the effective date of the retraction.

FCS.PR.B is tracked by HIMIPref™, but is relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.