Category: Issue Comments

Issue Comments

Low-Spread FixedResets: August 2015

As noted in MAPF Portfolio Composition: August 2015, the fund now has a large allocation to FixedResets, mostly of relatively low spread.

Many of these were largely purchased with proceeds of sales of DeemedRetractibles from the same issuer; it is interesting to look at the price trend of some of the Straight/FixedReset pairs. We’ll start with GWO.PR.N / GWO.PR.I; the fund sold the latter to buy the former at a takeout of about $1.00 in mid-June, 2014; relative prices over the past year are plotted as:

GWOPRN_GWOPRI_bidDiff_150831
Click for Big

Given that the August month-end take-out was $6.85, this is clearly a trade that has not worked out very well.

In July, 2014, I reported sales of SLF.PR.D to purchase SLF.PR.G at a take-out of about $0.15:

SLFPRG_SLFPRD_bidDiff_150831
Click for Big

There were similar trades in August, 2014 (from SLF.PR.C) at a take-out of $0.35. The August month-end take-out (bid price SLF.PR.D less bid price SLF.PR.G) was $4.28, so that hasn’t worked very well either.

November saw the third insurer-based sector swap, as the fund sold MFC.PR.C to buy the FixedReset MFC.PR.F at a post-dividend-adjusted take-out of about $0.85 … given an August month-end take-out of $4.88, that’s another regrettable trade, although another piece executed in December at a take-out of $1.57 has less badly.

MFCPRF_MFCPRC_bidDiff_150831
Click for Big

This trend is not restricted to the insurance sector, which I expect will become subject to NVCC rules in the relatively near future and are thus subject to the same redemption assumptions I make for DeemedRetractibles. Other pairs of interest are BAM.PR.X / BAM.PR.N:

BAMPRX_BAMPRN_bidDiff_150831
Click for Big

… and FTS.PR.H / FTS.PR.J:

FTSPRH_FTSPRJ_bidDiff_150831
Click for Big

… and PWF.PR.P / PWF.PR.S:

PWFPRP_PWFPRS_bidDiff_150831
Click for Big

I will agree that the fund’s trades highlighted in this post may be decried as cases of monumental bad timing, but I should point out that in May, 2014, the fund was 63.9% Straight / 9.5% FixedReset while in May 2015 the fund was 12% Straight / 86% FixedReset, FloatingReset and FixedFloater (The latter figures include allocations from those usually grouped as ‘Scraps’). Given that the indices are roughly 30% Straight / 60% FixedReset & FloatingReset, it is apparent that the fund was extremely overweighted in Straights / underweighted in FixedResets in May 2014 but this situation has now reversed. HIMIPref™ analytics have been heavily favouring low-spread issues and the fund’s holdings are overwhelmingly of this type.

Summarizing the charts above in tabular form, we see:

FixedReset Straight Take-out
December 2013
Take-out
MAPF Trade
Take-out
December 2014
July 2015 August 2015
GWO.PR.N
3.65%+130
GWO.PR.I
4.5%
($0.04) $1.00 $2.95 5.70 6.85
SLF.PR.G
4.35%+141
SLF.PR.D
4.45%
($1.29) $0.25 $2.16 5.01 4.28
MFC.PR.F
4.20%+141
MFC.PR.C
4.50%
($1.29) $0.86 $1.20 4.46 4.88
BAM.PR.X
4.60%+180
BAM.PR.N
4.75%
($2.06)   $0.17 4.73 5.80
FTS.PR.H
4.25%+145
FTS.PR.J
4.75%
$0.60   $5.68 5.46 7.05
PWF.PR.P
4.40%+160
PWF.PR.S
4.80%
($0.67)   $3.00 5.55 6.39
The ‘Take-Out’ is the bid price of the Straight less the bid price of the FixedReset; approximate execution prices are used for the “MAPF Trade” column. Bracketted figures in the ‘Take-Out’ columns indicate a ‘Pay-Up’

Changes were varied from July month-end to August month-end.

In January, a slow decline due to fears of deflation got worse with Canada yields plummeting after the Bank of Canada rate cut with speculation rife about future cuts although this slowly died away.

And in late March / early April it got worse again, with one commenter attributing at least some of the blame to the John Heinzl piece in which I pointed out the expected reduction in dividend payouts! In May, a rise in the markets in the first half of the month was promptly followed by a slow decline in the latter half; perhaps due to increased fears that a lousy Canadian economy will delay a Canadian tightening. Changes in June varied as the markets were in an overall decline.

In August we saw increased fear of global deflation emanating from China, although the ‘China Effect’ is disputed.

All in all, I take the view that we’ve seen this show before: during the Credit Crunch, Floaters got hit extremely badly (to the point at which their fifteen year total return was negative) because (as far as I can make out) their dividend rate was dropping (as it was linked to Prime) while the yields on other perpetual preferred instruments were skyrocketing (due to credit concerns). Thus, at least some investors insisted on getting long term corporate yields from rates based (indirectly and with a lag, in the case of FixedResets) on short-term government policy rates. And it’s happening again!

There is further discussion of the extremely poor YTD performance of FixedResets in the post eMail to a Client.

Here’s the August performance for FixedResets that had a YTW Scenario of ‘To Perptuity’ at mid-month.:

FRPerf_150831_1Mo
Click for Big

The market continues to be rather disorderly, but correlations between Issue Reset Spread and monthly performance for the “Pfd-2 Group” for August improved to 37% while the “Pfd-3 Group” correlation is a mere 4%. However, the correlation for returns against term to reset are still lousy at 8% and 0% for Pfd-2 and Pfd-3 issues respectively.

FRPerfTerm_150831_1Mo
Click for Big
Better Communication, Please!

ALA.PR.A To Reset At 3.38%

I have learned that ALA.PR.A will reset at 3.38%.

ALA.PR.A is a FixedReset with a spread of 266bp over five-year Canadas, which commenced trading August 19, 2010 after being announced August 10, 2010. The original coupon was 5.00%, so the reset rate of 3.38% represents a decline of 32%. Hey, by recent 40%+ standards, that looks good!

Holders have the option to convert into a FloatingReset, and this option must be exercised prior to 5pm, September 15 before vanishing until the next reset date in 2020. Recent market conditions have been highly unfavourable for FloatingResets and it is likely that I will recommend against conversion. However, conditions can change dramatically and rapidly and I will wait until September 10 to make a more formal recommendation.

Note that the September 15 notification date is for notification of the company, and brokers will generally have an internal deadline a day or two prior to this … so if you’re planning to wait until the last minute, contact your broker and find out precisely when the last minute will be!

I complained yesterday about the lack of information made available by the company and sent them an eMail. AltaGas’ Investor Relations department refused to answer my question directly and instead gave me contact information for a third party not employed by AltaGas, expressing the pious hope that he “may be able to assist.”

AltaGas’ Investor Relations department must be the most totally useless public company department on earth.

Better Communication, Please!

What Is The Reset Rate On ALA.PR.A?

To my surprise and irritation, the reset rate on ALA.PR.A has not yet been announced.

The company’s preferred share page has a link to the Prospectus Supplement for the issue, but this link takes one to SEDAR, so I can’t provide a direct link to the document myself. The regulators are doing a fine job of making access to public documents inconvenient to the investor-scum elements of the public!

However, the relevant parts of the Supplement are:

“Initial Fixed Rate Period” means the period from and including the date of issue of the Series A Shares to, but excluding, September 30, 2015.

“Subsequent Fixed Rate Period” means, for the initial Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the period from and including September 30, 2015 to, but excluding, September 30, 2020, and for each succeeding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period means the period from and including the day immediately following the last day of the immediately preceding Subsequent Fixed Rate Period to, but excluding, September 30 in the fifth year thereafter.

“Fixed Rate Calculation Date” means, for any Subsequent Fixed Rate Period, the 30th day prior to the first day of such Subsequent Fixed Rate Period.

On each Fixed Rate Calculation Date, AltaGas shall determine the Annual Fixed Dividend Rate for the ensuing Subsequent Fixed Rate Period. Each such determination shall, in the absence of manifest error, be final and binding upon AltaGas and upon all holders of Series A Shares. AltaGas shall, on each Fixed Rate Calculation Date, give written notice of the Annual Fixed Dividend Rate for the ensuing Subsequent Fixed Rate Period to the registered holders of the then outstanding Series A Shares.

The Series A Shares and Series B Shares will be issued in “book entry only” form and must be purchased or transferred through a participant in the CDS depository service (“CDS Participant”). AltaGas will cause a global certificate or certificates representing any newly issued Series A Shares or Series B Shares to be delivered to, and registered in the name of, CDS or its nominee.

So Altagas has fulfilled the letter of their obligation by sending a billet-doux to CDS, which is:

a wholly owned subsidiary of TMX Group Limited
(TMX Group)

which in turn is substantially owned by:

Each of CIBC World Markets Inc., National Bank Financial & Co. Inc., Scotia Capital Inc., and TD Securities Inc., either directly or through an affiliate, has agreed to maintain a specified minimum ownership interest in TMX Group for a period of five years from September 14, 2012. For the year ended September 14, 2013, each of these investors were required to own at least 6.25%, and for each of the four following years, each of these investors must own at least 5.625%, of our common shares outstanding as
at September 14, 2012″

Assiduous Readers will remember the July 4, 2012 report that the regulators had agreed to permit an extension of the banking oligopoly’s hegemony over the Canadian financial system in return for something the regulators consider very important: extra payments to the regulators.

So what it all boils down to is: investors are scum. If you want to know what the reset rate on ALA.PR.A is, your best bet is to ‘phone your friendly (and probably bank-owned) broker and, after listening to a pitch for GICs while you’re on hold for half an hour, ask your friendly Customer Service Rep if they wouldn’t mind telling you the reset rate on this issue, provided it doesn’t interfere with lunch or anything.

However, hope springs eternal and I have sent the following missive to AltaGas Investor Relations:

Sirs,

It is my understanding from the prospectus supplement that the dividend rate for ALA.PR.A for the period September 30, 2015, to September 29, 2020, has been determined.

What is the new dividend rate?

Will there be any kind of announcement or notification on your website?

Sincerely,

Issue Comments

NPI.PR.A To Reset At 3.51%

Northland Power Inc. has announced:

that pursuant to the share terms in respect of the Cumulative Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series 1 (“Series 1 Shares”), it has determined the fixed dividend rate for the five years commencing September 30, 2015 and ending September 29, 2020. The fixed quarterly dividends on the Series 1 Shares during that period will be paid at an annual rate of 3.51% (Cdn. $0.22 per share per quarter).

Holders of Series 1 Shares have the right, at their option, exercisable not later than 5:00 pm (Toronto time) on September 15, 2015, to convert all or part of their Series 1 Shares, on a one-for-one basis, into Cumulative Floating Rate Preferred Shares, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Shares”), effective September 30, 2015. The quarterly floating rate dividends on the Series 2 Shares will be paid at an annual rate, calculated for each quarter, of 2.80% over the annual yield on 90-day Government of Canada treasury bills. The actual quarterly dividend rate in respect of the September 30, 2015 to December 30, 2015 dividend period for the Series 2 Shares will be 0.80% (3.18% on an annualized basis) and the dividend, if and when declared, for such dividend period will be Cdn. $0.20 per share, payable on December 31, 2015.

Holders of Series 1 Shares are not required to elect to convert all or any part of their Series 1 Shares into Series 2 Shares.

As provided in the share conditions of the Series 1 Shares, (i) if Northland determines that there would be fewer than 1,000,000 Series 1 Shares outstanding after September 30, 2015, all remaining Series 1 Shares will be automatically converted into Series 2 Shares on a one-for-one basis effective September 30, 2015; or (ii) if Northland determines that there would be fewer than 1,000,000 Series 2 Shares outstanding after September 30, 2015, no Series 1 Shares will be permitted to be converted into Series 2 Shares. There are currently 6,000,000 Series 1 Shares outstanding.

The Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) has conditionally approved the listing of the Series 2 Shares effective upon conversion. Listing of the Series 2 Shares is subject to Northland fulfilling all the listing requirements of the TSX and, upon approval, the Series 2 Shares will be listed on the TSX under the trading symbol “NPI.PR.B”.

NPI.PR.A is a FixedReset with a spread of 280bp over five-year Canadas, which commenced trading July 28, 2015 under the ticker symbol NPP.PR.A after being announced July 6, 2010. The ticker was changed effective January 1, 2011 after conversion from an Income Trust. The original coupon was 5.25%, so the reset rate of 3.51% represents a decline of 33%. Hey, by recent 40%+ standards, that looks good!

As noted in the press release, holders have the option to convert into NPI.PR.B, a FloatingReset, and this option must be exercised prior to 5pm, September 15 before vanishing until the next reset date in 2020. Recent market conditions have been highly unfavourable for FloatingResets and it is likely that I will recommend against conversion. However, conditions can change dramatically and rapidly and I will wait until September 10 to make a more formal recommendation.

Note that the September 15 notification date is for notification of the company, and brokers will generally have an internal deadline a day or two prior to this … so if you’re planning to wait until the last minute, contact your broker and find out precisely when the last minute will be!

Issue Comments

FFH.PR.G To Reset At 3.318%

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited has announced:

that it has determined the fixed dividend rate on its Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series G (“Series G Shares”) (TSX:FFH.PR.G) for the five years commencing October 1, 2015 and ending September 30, 2020. The fixed quarterly dividends on the Series G Shares during that period will be paid at an annual rate of 3.318% (Cdn.$0.207375 per share per quarter).

Holders of Series G Shares have the right, at their option, exercisable not later than 5:00pm (Toronto time) on September 15, 2015, to convert all or part of their Series G Shares, on a one-for-one basis, into Cumulative Floating Rate Preferred Shares, Series H (the “Series H Shares”), effective September 30, 2015. The quarterly floating rate dividends on the Series H Shares will be paid at an annual rate, calculated for each quarter, of 2.56% over the annual yield on three month Government of Canada treasury bills. The actual quarterly dividend rate in respect of the October 1, 2015 to December 30, 2015 dividend period for the Series H Shares will be 0.731987% (2.936% on an annualized basis) and the dividend for such dividend period, if and when declared, will be Cdn.$0.18300 per share, payable on December 30, 2015.

Holders of Series G Shares are not required to elect to convert all or any part of their Series G Shares into Series H Shares. A holder of Series G Shares who does not so elect will (subject to the next paragraph) retain their Series G Shares.

As provided in the share conditions of the Series G Shares, (i) if Fairfax determines that there would be fewer than 1,000,000 Series G Shares outstanding after September 30, 2015, all remaining Series G Shares will be automatically converted into Series H Shares on a one-for-one basis effective September 30, 2015; and (ii) if Fairfax determines that there would be fewer than 1,000,000 Series H Shares outstanding after September 30, 2015, no Series G Shares will be permitted to be converted into Series H Shares. There are currently 10,000,000 Series G Shares outstanding.

The Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) has conditionally approved the listing of the Series H Shares effective upon conversion. Listing of the Series H Shares is subject to Fairfax fulfilling all the listing requirements of the TSX and, upon approval, the Series H Shares will be listed on the TSX under the trading symbol “FFH.PR.H”.

Fairfax is a holding company which, through its subsidiaries, is engaged in property and casualty insurance and reinsurance and investment management.

FFH.PR.G is a FixedReset with a spread of 256bp over five-year Canadas, which commenced trading July 28, 2010 after being announced July 20, 2010. The original coupon was 5.00%, so the reset rate of 3.318% represents a decline of 34%. Hey, by recent 40%+ standards, that looks good!

As noted in the press release, holders have the option to convert into FFH.PR.H, a FloatingReset, and this option must be exercised prior to 5pm, September 15 before vanishing until the next reset date in 2020. Recent market conditions have been highly unfavourable for FloatingResets and it is likely that I will recommend against conversion. However, conditions can change dramatically and rapidly and I will wait until September 10 to make a more formal recommendation.

Note that the September 15 notification date is for notification of the company, and brokers will generally have an internal deadline a day or two prior to this … so if you’re planning to wait until the last minute, contact your broker and find out precisely when the last minute will be!

Issue Comments

NA.PR.M To Be Redeemed

The National Bank of Canada has announced:

its intention to redeem on November 15, 2015, all of its issued and outstanding Non-Cumulative Fixed Rate First Preferred Shares Series 20 (the “Preferred Shares Series 20”) for total redemption price of approximately $176 million.

Pursuant to the share conditions, on November 15, 2015, the Bank may redeem the Preferred Shares Series 20 at a price equal to $25.50 per share together with all declared and unpaid dividends.

Separately from the payment of the redemption price, the declared quarterly dividend of $0.375, payable on November 15, 2015, will be paid in the usual manner to shareholders of record on October 13, 2015.

Since November 15, 2015 is a non-business day, any payments due to shareholders on such date will be made on the first business day following such date, being Monday, November 16, 2015.

A formal notice will be issued to holders of the Preferred Shares Series 20 in accordance with the share conditions. The redemption is subject to the final approval of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI).

The Bank recommends shareholders consult with their tax advisors to determine the appropriate treatment and impact of the redemption.

Since the redemption is being priced at a premium to par, the Deemed Dividend rules come into account for taxable shareholders. Shareholders who allow their shares to be redeemed will be taxed as if they had sold it for $25.00 and simultaneously received a dividend of $0.50; shareholders who sell on the market (at a price which, unless something goes terribly wrong, should be a few pennies under the total redemption value, which will include the final actual dividend until that goes ex) will be taxed normally. The most favourable course will depend on the investors personal tax situation; please consult your personal tax advisor.

Issue Comments

DBRS Downgrades ENB Preferreds To Junk

DBRS has announced:

has today downgraded Enbridge Inc.’s (ENB) Issuer Rating and Medium-Term Notes & Unsecured Debentures rating to BBB (high) from A (low), Commercial Paper rating to R-2 (high) from R-1 (low) and Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares rating to Pfd-3 (high) from Pfd-2 (low). The trends are all Stable. ENB’s ratings were placed Under Review with Developing Implications on December 3, 2014, and changed to Under Review with Negative Implications on June 19, 2015 (please see DBRS press releases for details). The current action removes the ratings from Under Review with Negative Implications.

The ENB ratings downgrade is consistent with DBRS’s expectations as noted in the June 19, 2015, press release and follows today’s approval by the public shareholders of Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc. (EIFH) of the Transaction described below. For the rationale for the downgrade of ENB’s ratings, please see “Impact on ENB – Update”, below.

IMPACT ON ENB – UPDATE
Following its review of the EIFH Management Information Circular (MIC), DBRS continues to believe that the combination of the Transaction and the EECI Transfer have negatively impacted ENB’s credit risk profile. Please see the June 19, 2015, DBRS press release for the main factors leading to that conclusion.

Prior to closing, EPA will issue a senior unsecured promissory note to ENB with a principal amount of approximately $4.1 billion (the Mirror Note), representing a portion of the required capitalization of EPA. Payments of principal and interest by EPA thereunder have been structured to mirror the payments of certain principal and interest required under certain Canadian MTNs issued by ENB.

While DBRS recognizes that the $4.1 billion Mirror Note provides ENB with a senior claim on EPA assets ranking ahead of EIF bond holder claims, this factor does not fully offset the increased structural subordination with respect to EPI’s assets and the loss of full access to EPA cash flows available prior to the Transaction.

Based on its review, DBRS has downgraded all of ENB’s ratings by one notch, with Stable trends following completion of the Transaction.

The two earlier warnings from DBRS were reported in PrefBlog in the posts Rating Agencies Unhappy With Enbridge and ENB Finalizes Dropdown; S&P Downgrades To P-2(low); DBRS Review-Negative.

Moody’s downgraded the ENB preferreds to junk in June, 2015.

Affected issues are: ENB.PF.A, ENB.PF.C, ENB.PF.E, ENB.PF.G, ENB.PR.A, ENB.PR.B, ENB.PR.D, ENB.PR.F, ENB.PR.H, ENB.PR.J, ENB.PR.N, ENB.PR.P, ENB.PR.T and ENB.PR.Y.

This is a major development: ENB issues comprise about 10% of the preferred share universe. If we look at the CPD credit quality breakdown, we find the sponsor indicates levels of 75.67% investment grade, 22.37% junk and 1.66% “other” (I confess I’m not sure what is meant by “other”). A shift of 10% between groups is significant!

I also note that the BMO-CM “50” index is 9.07% ENB issues.

I do not expect significant price action as a result of this downgrade – it was well telegraphed in advance and Enbridge fans can comfort themselves with the thought that the issues remain investment-grade according to S&P. Additionally, we may examine Chart FR-29 from the August PrefLetter:

PL_150814_App_FR_Chart_29
Click for Big

This chart shows the relationship between Issue Reset Spread and YTW for all FixedResets for which the YTW Scenario is extension until perpetuity. Correlations are fairly low, 10% for the “Pfd-2 Group” (issues rated Pfd-2(high), Pfd-2 and Pfd-2(low) by DBRS) and 15% for the Pfd-3 Group, but given that all information about each issue other than Issue Reset Spread, credit group, YTW and YTW-scenario has been thrown out, I’d say it’s close enough for government work!

The point is … see those purple boxes (Pfd-2 Group) that are right smack dab on top of the Pfd-3 Group regression line? That’s Enbridge. The downgrade has been anticipated by the market; we can construct the following table:

ENB FixedResets – Predicted vs. Actual YTW
August 14, 2015
Ticker Issue
Reset
Spread
Predicted
YTW
Pfd-2
Predicted
YTW
Pfd-3
Actual
YTW
ENB.PF.A 266 4.11% 5.16% 4.91%
ENB.PF.C 264 4.10% 5.14% 4.90%
ENB.PF.E 266 4.11% 5.16% 4.90%
ENF.PF.G 268 4.12% 5.18% 4.98%
ENB.PR.B 240 3.99% 4.94% 4.97%
ENB.PR.D 237 3.97% 4.92% 4.97%
ENB.PR.F 251 4.04% 5.03% 4.97%
ENB.PR.H 212 3.85% 4.71% 4.78%
ENB.PR.J 257 4.07% 5.08% 4.93%
ENB.PR.N 265 4.10% 5.15% 4.98%
ENB.PR.P 250 4.03% 5.03% 4.93%
ENB.PR.T 250 4.03% 5.03% 4.95%
ENB.PR.Y 238 3.98% 4.92% 4.75%

Still, there will always be some investors who are surprised and others who were hoping a longshot affirmation would come through – so we’ll just see what the coming weeks bring by way of price movement!

Issue Comments

Anonymous / RBC Moronize Market!

Well! There’s going to be a little bounce in the tracking error reports next time the ETF figures come out!

TXPR was down 0.81%:

TXPR_150819
Click for Big

See that? Just a tiny little sliver of vertical drop at 3:59pm, from about 676.70 to what the TMX claims is 672.10, although that’s off the chart.

But the ETF based on TXPR, CPD? Down a mere 0.37%:

CPD_150819
Click for Big

TXPL? Down 1.15% … you can just see a little sliver at the end, where the index moves from about 728.25 to a claimed 721.77, which is again off the chart.

TXPL_150819
Click for Big

How about the ETF based on TXPL, ZPR? Down a mere 0.18%:

zpr_150819
Click for Big

It’s rather odd. Unfortunately the Exchange’s indices are based on prices while my indices and all my data are based on quotes, but we’ll see what we can do … let’s look at some of the big losers on a bid/bid basis:

BMO.PR.W FixedReset -5.50 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 20.44
Evaluated at bid price : 20.44
Bid-YTW : 3.66 %

The day’s range was 21.38-66 (quite reasonable!), but the closing quote was 20.44-50, 40×2, which must be some kind of record for separation between the two measures. There are nine trades timestamped 3:59, totalling 1,680 shares, executed in a range of 21.38-40. Six of these trades are listed with RBC as the seller, three with anonymous.

CM.PR.Q FixedReset -4.64 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 22.18
Evaluated at bid price : 22.82
Bid-YTW : 3.71 %

The day’s range was 22.64-23.95 (!) with a closing quote of 22.82-24.05 (!), 17×20. There are five trades timestamped 3:59, totalling 600 shares, executed in a range of 22.64-82. Four of these trades have an anonymous seller, one RBC.

BAM.PR.K Floater -4.39 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 11.75
Evaluated at bid price : 11.75
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %

The day’s range was 11.70-32 with a closing quote of 11.75-24, 19×3. There were no trades timestamped 3:59.

ENB.PR.H FixedReset -4.32 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 14.18
Evaluated at bid price : 14.18
Bid-YTW : 5.13 %

The day’s range was 14.18-92 with a closing quote of 14.18-55, 8×1. There are 24 trades timestamped 3:59, totalling 2,460 shares, executed in a range of 14.18-50. Fourteen of these trades have an anonymous seller, nine RBC, one Nesbitt.

BAM.PR.X FixedReset -4.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 15.19
Evaluated at bid price : 15.19
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %

The day’s range was 15.23-85 with a closing quote of 15.19-74, 5×3. There are six trades timestamped 3:59, totalling 700 shares, executed in a range of 15.23-38. Five of these trades have an anonymous seller, one RBC.

TD.PF.A FixedReset -3.89 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 21.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.00
Bid-YTW : 3.62 %

The day’s range was 21.00-91 with a closing quote of 21.00-55, 15×1. There are thirteen trades timestamped 3:59, totalling 1,666 shares, executed in a range of 21.00-70 (!) There is one sale from Laurentian, five from RBC and seven anonymous.

TD.PF.B FixedReset -3.71 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 21.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.00
Bid-YTW : 3.61 %

The day’s range was 21.00-94 with a closing quote of 21.00-67, 15×1. There are fourteen trades timestamped 3:59, totalling 1,366 shares, executed in a range of 21.00-65 (!). There are two sales from National, four from RBC and eight anonymous.

BAM.PF.E FixedReset -3.55 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 20.65
Evaluated at bid price : 20.65
Bid-YTW : 4.21 %

The day’s range was 20.01-21.54 (!) with a closing quote of 20.65-21.75 (!), 8×56. There are six trades timestamped 3:59, totalling 700 shares, all executed at 20.67 (the day’s low of 20.01 was 400 shares executed at 3:12, seller was National). Five of the last minute sales were anonymous, one RBC.

TRP.PR.D FixedReset -3.31 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-19
Maturity Price : 18.42
Evaluated at bid price : 18.42
Bid-YTW : 4.29 %

The day’s range was 18.42-10, with a closing quote of 18.42-06, 3×1. There are thirteen trades timestamped 3:59, totalling 2,400 shares, executed in a range of 18.42-95. Seven of these trades are RBC, six anonymous.

*****************************************************

Well, that’s enough examples to be getting along with!

Here’s my guess: a broker from RBC decided to get a lot of his clients out of the preferred share market and his Sales Assistant spent all day inputting the orders for execution at 3:59. Some of these were put in as anonymous, some as RBC (maybe their algorithm input screen has a tick box and default?). The behaviour of BMO.PR.W suggests that these were limit orders (maybe a limit of 20.50 on those?) but other evidence (e.g., CM.PR.Q) suggests that if there was a limit, it was pretty low relative to the day’s trading.

Then the clock ticked 3:59 and presto! The market, being thin, got moronized on relatively tiny volume!

I will emphasize that the above is a guess! I have no way of telling whether the orders listed as anonymous were in fact coming out of RBC. The RBC broker might have been given explicit instructions by clients about how they wanted the trades executed. Each of these tiny little sales that I do know came out of RBC could have been from a different broker. They could also have come directly out of individual investors independently via RBC Direct Investing. It could have been an institutional client with Direct Market Access via RBC (or even RBC’s preferred desk itself), doing something silly with an algorithm. It could have been a lot of things.

Issue Comments

EMA.PR.B Listed: 36% Conversion From EMA.PR.A

Emera Incorporated has announced:

that 2,135,364 of its 6,000,000 issued and outstanding Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset First Preferred Shares, Series A (the “Series A Shares”) were tendered for conversion, on a one-for-one basis into Cumulative Floating Rate First Preferred Shares, Series B (the “Series B Shares”). As a result of the conversion, Emera has 3,864,636 Series A Shares and 2,135,364 Series B Shares issued and outstanding. The Series A Shares will continue to be listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol EMA.PR.A. The Series B Shares will begin trading on the TSX today under the symbol EMA.PR.B.

EMA.PR.A is a FixedReset with an Issue Reset Spread of 184bp that has just reset at 2.555%. EMA.PR.B is its FloatingReset, paying three month bills +184bp. The next interconversion date is 2020-8-15. I had previously recommended that holders of EMA.PR.A continue to hold the issue as I expect that EMA.PR.B will trade – at least initially – at lower levels than EMA.PR.A.

EMA.PR.B traded zero shares today (consolidated exchanges) and closed with a quote of 12.13-18.00, 1×5. Zero activity on the first day is normal; retail holders who converted won’t see the new shares in their account until tomorrow and it might also be expected that those who just made the decision to convert are less likely than otherwise to want to sell two weeks later.

EMA.PR.B will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and will be assigned to the Scraps index on credit concerns. Vital statistics are:

EMA.PR.B FloatingReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2045-08-17
Maturity Price : 12.13
Evaluated at bid price : 12.13
Bid-YTW : 4.58 %
Issue Comments

DF.PR.A Semi-Annual Report 2015

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has released its Semi-Annual Report to May 31, 2014.

Figures of interest are:

MER: 1.24% of the whole unit value, “to reflect the normal operating expenses of the Company excluding any one time secondary offering expenses.”.

Average Net Assets: We need this to calculate portfolio yield. The Total Assets of the fund at year end was $198.6-million, compared to $232.2-million on May 31, so call it an average of $223.8-million.

Underlying Portfolio Yield: Income received of $3.953-million divided by average net assets of $223.8-million, multiplied by two because it’s semiannual is 3.34%.

Income Coverage: Net investment income of $2.300-million divided by preferred share dividends of $3.122-million is 74%.

Note that both the calculated portfolio yield and the income coverage are more than what was calculated according to the 2014 Annual Report. There was a secondary offering during the period but it does not appear to have had much effect on calculated numbers.