Category: Issue Comments

Brookfield Asset Management has announced:

an offering of C$425 million of medium term notes (unsecured) (“notes”) with a March 2023 maturity and a yield of 4.546%.

The notes have been assigned a credit rating of Baa2 (stable outlook) by Moody’s; A – (negative outlook) by Standard & Poor’s; BBB (stable outlook) by Fitch; and A low (stable outlook) by DBRS. The notes are being offered through a syndicate of agents led by CIBC World Markets Inc., Scotia Capital Inc. and TD Securities Inc.

The company intends to use the net proceeds of the issue to redeem or repurchase $350 million of 8.95% notes that mature on June 2, 2014 and for general corporate purposes.

However, the item that most caught my eye was the rating announcement from DBRS (bolding added):

DBRS has today assigned a rating of A (low) to the $425 million Unsecured Medium-Term Notes (MTN) maturing March 31, 2023, issued today by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (Brookfield). The trend is Stable.

The MTN will rank pari passu with all of Brookfield’s other senior unsecured debt obligations. The Company intends to use the net proceeds to redeem or repurchase $350 million of its 8.95% MTNs that will mature June 2, 2014 and for general corporate purposes.

The new issue will result in a modest increase in Brookfield’s long-term debt. As expressed in our Rating Report published April 24, 2012, DBRS considers that the current corporate-level financial measures at Brookfield are weak for its ratings and believes that there is currently minimal room for further deterioration without pressuring the ratings. We re-iterate our expectation (as expressed in our Rating Report published on April 24, 2012) that Brookfield will improve its cash flow coverage metrics to their 2010 level by the end of 2012. These levels are: funds from operation (FFO) coverage of debt of 30% and FFO coverage of interests of 5.0x. We understand that Brookfield intends to achieve a lower debt level mainly through reducing its outstanding commercial paper issuance and drawdown in credit facilities.

If one of the following scenarios were to materialize, DBRS will review and base our rating decision on an assessment of the contributing causes, the Company’s remedial plan and other relevant circumstances. These scenarios are: (1) material increase in the proportion of BAM’s invested capital in less-stable opportunistic investments and private equity, leading to debt increases; (2) material deterioration or rating downgrade in one or more of the core businesses in renewable power, property investments and infrastructure; (3) inability to improve cash flow coverage metrics (which could include FFO-to-debt and FFO fixed charge coverage) to their 2010 levels by the end of 2012.

This is new information, as far as I can tell. The only mention of commercial paper in the 12Q2 Financials is:

We completed the refinancing of the majority of our corporate level, $2.2 billion committed revolving term credit facilities subsequent to the end of the quarter. At June 30, 2012, approximately $1.6 billion of the facilities was utilized in respect of short-term bank or commercial paper borrowings and $0.2 billion utilized for letters of credit issued to support various business initiatives. Approximately $1.9 billion of the new facilities have a five-year term, and the remaining $300 million have a three-year term.

This is good news, because BAM is skating pretty near the water in terms of maintaining an investment-grade rating on its preferreds. The negative outlook from S&P is still in place.

BAM has a plethora of preferred share issues outstanding: BAM.PR.B & BAM.PR.C (Floater), BAM.PR.E (RatchetRate), BAM.PR.G (FixedFloater), BAM.PR.I (called for redemption) & BAM.PR.J (OperatingRetractible), BAM.PR.K (Floater), BAM.PR.M & BAM.PR.N (PerpetualDiscount), BAM.PR.O (OperatingRetractible), BAM.PR.P, BAM.PR.R, BAM.PR.T, BAM.PR.X, BAM.PR.Z and BAM.PF.A (FixedReset) … and one in the oven (FixedReset).

The YLO recapitalization announced in July and amended September 4, has been approved:

Yellow Media (TSX: YLO) announced today that its proposed recapitalization has been approved by the requisite majority of its debtholders and shareholders at their respective meetings, both of which were held earlier today in Montréal.

“We are pleased with the results of the vote” said Marc P. Tellier, Yellow Media’s President and Chief Executive Officer. “The approval by the debtholders and shareholders represents a significant milestone towards the completion of the recapitalization.”

The Company proposed the recapitalization to align its capital structure with its operating strategy. The recapitalization will substantially improve the financial flexibility of the Company and allow the Company to pursue its ongoing transformation in order to enhance long-term value for stakeholders.

The implementation of the recapitalization is expected to occur by the end of September 2012 subject to a number of conditions, including the receipt of the final approval by the Québec Superior Court, and to other risks and uncertainties.

The preferred shares, YLO.PR.A, YLO.PR.B, YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D, immediately jumped from about $0.50 to the $0.70-0.80 range.

As preferred shareholders will get 6.25 new common per 100 preferreds (as well as some warrants) this indicates that new common is being priced at about $12/share.

As about 28-million new common shares will be issued (and some warrants) this indicates market capitalization of about $335-million on the restructured company, on top of about $850-million in debt. As noted on April 9 the Cerberus / AT&T transaction indicated an enterprise value of about $1-billion for YLO, which some people (according to Boyd Erman) thought could stretch to the 1.4-billion to 2.2-billion range.

The common shares are now trading at 0.085-0.09; the recapitalization’s conversion ratios indicate that one preferred share should be worth about 12.5 old common shares.

Update, 2012-9-10: YLO provides reorganization timing:

Yellow Media Inc. (TSX: YLO) announced today that, following the approval of the recapitalization by the requisite majority of the Company’s debtholders and shareholders at their respective meetings held on September 6, 2012, the hearing for the final approval of the recapitalization by the Québec Superior Court has been set by the Court to begin on October 15, 2012.

The implementation of the recapitalization is currently expected to occur on or about October 31, 2012, subject to a number of conditions, including the receipt of the Court’s final approval as set forth above, and to other risks and uncertainties.

BCE has announced:

that 2,957,474 of its 10,081,586 fixed-rate Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AA (series AA preferred shares) have been tendered for conversion on September 1, 2012, on a one-for-one basis, into floating-rate Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AB (series AB preferred shares). In addition, 3,020,190 of its 9,918,414 series AB preferred shares have been tendered for conversion on September 1, 2012, on a one-for-one basis, into series AA preferred shares. Consequently, on September 1, 2012, BCE will have 10,144,302 series AA preferred shares and 9,855,698 series AB preferred shares issued and outstanding. The series AA preferred shares and the series AB preferred shares will continue to be listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols BCE.PR.A and BCE.PR.B, respectively.

The series AA preferred shares will pay on a quarterly basis, for the five-year period beginning on September 1, 2012, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE, a fixed cash dividend based on an annual fixed dividend rate of 3.45%.

The series AB preferred shares will continue to pay a monthly floating adjustable cash dividend for the five-year period beginning on September 1, 2012, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE. The monthly floating adjustable dividend for any particular month will continue to be calculated based on the prime rate for such month and using the Designated Percentage for such month representing the sum of an adjustment factor (based on the market price of the series AB preferred shares in the preceding month) and the Designated Percentage for the preceding month.

I’m surprised to see that so many BCE.PR.A remain, particularly since I recommended conversion to BCE.PR.B. But that’s what makes a market!

Both BCE.PR.A and BCE.PR.B are tracked by HIMIPref™; both are relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

As part of their new issue announcement, Brookfield Office Properties has announced:

The net proceeds of the issue will be used to redeem Brookfield Office Properties’ Cumulative Class AAA Preference Shares, Series F and, to the extent the underwriters’ option is exercised, for general corporate purposes. The offering is expected to close on or about September 13, 2012.

BPO.PR.F is an OperatingRetractible paying 6% of par, redeemable at par commencing 2012-9-30. It is tracked by HIMIPref™ but relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

Yellow Media Inc. has announced:

that, in connection with its proposed recapitalization, it has amended the plan of arrangement to be considered and voted upon by the Company’s debtholders and shareholders at the meetings scheduled to be held this coming Thursday, September 6, 2012.

The Board of Directors of Yellow Media has decided to amend the plan of arrangement pursuant to Section 6.3 thereof so that the Company’s existing convertible unsecured subordinated debentures will be exchanged, as part of the recapitalization, for an increased number of existing common shares, on the basis of 50 shares, up from 12.5 shares, for each $100 principal amount of existing subordinated debentures. This amendment is supported by the holders of the Company’s existing medium term notes that have executed support agreements in favour of the recapitalization. The revised exchange ratio is the same as the exchange ratio used to determine the consideration to be received pursuant to the recapitalization by holders of the Company’s existing preferred shares. The Board has made this decision after giving consideration to the numerous representations made to the Company regarding the recapitalization, in particular by holders of existing subordinated debentures. Yellow Media is of the view that the recapitalization, after giving effect to the amendment, is responsive to the comments which have been received and strikes a better balance between the interests of stakeholders having regard to available alternatives while recognizing the imperative of moving forward with the recapitalization in order to provide the Company with the necessary financial flexibility to pursue its ongoing business transformation.
…
The amendment does not affect the relative treatment of senior debtholders under the recapitalization. As such, in order to preserve the allocation to senior debtholders under the recapitalization and to account for the increased number of new common shares to be issued, the number of new common shares to be issued to senior debtholders pursuant to the recapitalization will increase from 21,295,090 to 23,062,947, the exercise price of the warrants will be reduced from $31.67 to $29.25, and the exchange price of the senior subordinated exchangeable debentures to be issued to senior debtholders pursuant to the recapitalization will be reduced from $21.95 to $20.27. The aggregate number of new common shares to be issued pursuant to the recapitalization will thus rise from 25,812,230 to 27,955,088.
…

So it used to be that preferred shareholders would be getting 1.8-million new common shares out of 25.8-million, or 7% of the company … now they’re getting 1.83-million out of 27.96-million, or 6.5%.

I have previously recommended that preferred shareholders should vote against the plan:

YLO has four series of preferred shares outstanding: YLO.PR.A, YLO.PR.B, YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D. I recommend that preferred shareholders vote against the plan, on the grounds that they are being treated as if they have all be forcibly converted into common at the YLO.PR.A / YLO.PR.B rates prior to the conversion of the old common into new securities. That’s reasonable for YLO.PR.A and YLO.PR.B, but not so much for YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D, which are not convertible by the company. And, even for the A & B holders – you’re not getting paid to vote yes, so why give it away? If the company wants a yes vote from you, they should provide a little sweetener; the offer that’s on the table is already a worst-case scenario.

Tim Kiladze of the Globe and Mail reports:

Yellow Media’s hopes of amending its restructuring proposal have been smacked down by a Quebec court just days before the company faces a vote on its much-criticized plan.

Early last week, Yellow Media put together a conference call to threaten that it would seek creditor protection in order to reduce almost $2-billion of debt should stakeholders vote against its current restructuring proposal. Those efforts were shot down just a few days later by judge Robert Mongeon, who delivered his ruling just a few hours before the long weekend started.

The sequence of events is a bit tricky to follow, but the gist of the story is that Yellow Media’s restructuring proposal has been filed under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA). Last week, Yellow Media chief executive officer Marc Tellier tried to complicate the matter by amending the current resolution to implement the plan through the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) if the current effort “appears for any reason impracticable.”
…
Judge Mongeon didn’t let that language influence him. “I am of the view that the proposed amendment should not be part of the process currently envisaged under the CBCA inasmuch as it deals only with another proceeding under a different statute and which is, at this time, purely hypothetical.”

He explained his reasoning in detail. First, the judge noted that even Yellow Media admits that the proposed amendment isn’t necessary to pursue arrangement currently up for debate under the CBCA. Second, the CBCA and CCAA have different tests of admissability and different procedures, so having one proposal technically apply to both would be very tricky.

I am, of course, not a lawyer, but it’s my understanding that the CBCA is for solvent companies and the CCCA is for insolvent ones. Different admissabilities indeed!

I have previously recommended that preferred shareholders should vote against the plan:

YLO has four series of preferred shares outstanding: YLO.PR.A, YLO.PR.B, YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D. I recommend that preferred shareholders vote against the plan, on the grounds that they are being treated as if they have all be forcibly converted into common at the YLO.PR.A / YLO.PR.B rates prior to the conversion of the old common into new securities. That’s reasonable for YLO.PR.A and YLO.PR.B, but not so much for YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D, which are not convertible by the company. And, even for the A & B holders – you’re not getting paid to vote yes, so why give it away? If the company wants a yes vote from you, they should provide a little sweetener; the offer that’s on the table is already a worst-case scenario.

The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has announced:

its intention to redeem all of its issued and outstanding Non-cumulative Class A Preferred Shares Series 18 for cash. The redemptions will occur on October 29, 2012. The redemption price is $25.00 per Series 18 share.

The $0.33811 per share dividend declared on August 30, 2012 will be the final dividend on the Series 18 shares for the period from August 1, 2012 to October 29, 2012, and will be paid on October 29, 2012 to shareholders of record on September 28, 2012.

Beneficial holders who are not directly the registered holder of these shares should contact the financial institution, broker or other intermediary through which they hold their shares to confirm how they will receive their redemption proceeds. Formal notices and instructions for the redemption of Series 18 shares will be forwarded to registered shareholders.

Brookfield Asset Management has announced:

Brookfield intends to use the net proceeds of the issue of Preferred Shares, Series 34 to redeem its Class A Preference Shares, Series 11 and for general corporate purposes.

BAM.PR.I is an OperatingRetractible – there goes another one! However, it paid 5.50% and had been redeemable at par since 2012-6-30, so it was clearly living on borrowed time.

The newly issued Series 34 shares are a FixedReset 4.20%+263.

Update, 2012-9-7: Official Announcement:

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (TSX: BAM.A) (NYSE:BAM); (EURONEXT:BAMA) announced today the redemption of its Class A Preference Shares, Series 11 (the “Series 11 Shares”) for cash, with a redemption date of September 30, 2012. The redemption price will be C$25.00 per Series 11 Share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon.

Notice of redemption has been sent to all registered holders of the Series 11 Shares. Payment will be made to all beneficial holders of the Series 11 Shares on or after October 1, 2012 through the facilities of CDS & Co., and to all other registered holders on October 1, 2012.

Scotia Managed Companies has announced:

Allbanc Split Corp. (the “Company”) announced today that its Board of Directors has retained Scotiabank to advise the Company on a possible extension and reorganization of the Company. There is no guarantee after such review an extension will be proposed and if proposed, will be approved by shareholders.

The Company is a mutual fund corporation created to hold a portfolio of publicly listed common shares of selected Canadian chartered banks. Class A Capital Shares, and Class B Preferred Shares of AllBanc Split Corp. are listed for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols ABK.A and ABK.PR.B respectively.

ABK.PR.B is a fairly small issue, with less than half a million shares outstanding with a par value of $26.75 each. It is scheduled for redemption 2013-3-8.

ABK.PR.B was last mentioned on PrefBlog in connection with their partial call for redemption in February. ABK.PR.B is not tracked by HIMIPref™.

The Financial Post had a piece by Barry Critchley on August 15:

Late Tuesday, the syndicate of lenders to Yellow Media issued a statement saying it “would be best for the company to withdraw its proposed Canada Business Corporations Act plan of arrangement and to enter into further negotiations with its stakeholders. The syndicate is of the view that certain aspects of the proposed plan can be improved upon for stakeholders.”

Earlier this month, the syndicate filed a motion in the Quebec Superior Court asking the interim order granted to Yellow Media be revoked. That motion, together with a similar motion filed by the convertible debentureholders, was essentially held over until after the Sept. 6 vote of security holders.

In Tuesday’s statement , McMillan LLP, counsel for the lenders, noted Yellow Media’s Q2 results showed “the company continues to generate significant cash flows,” adding Yellow Media did not include cash flow forecasts as part of the information circular filed with the court on Aug. 3. Accordingly, “the company’s future cash flow forecasts should be disclosed to affected stakeholders so that they can better assess the merits of the company’s proposed plan.”

The McMillan statement notes:

The Syndicate’s objective is to work with the other stakeholders on a more level informational playing field to develop a plan that could be lawfully implemented and that would allow the Company to pursue its business plan, while still reflecting prudent commercial lending standards and an appropriate allocation of value for senior creditors. Such a plan could offer junior creditors and equity holders an opportunity to retain a material stake in the Company with upside in the future.

Implementation of the Company’s current plan is not urgent. The Company has disclosed that it does not project any imminent cash shortfall.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. (“PwC”) is assisting the Syndicate in developing a response to be provided to the Company on its reorganization plan. Interested stakeholders are invited to contact PwC to share their ideas and views.

With no specific contact information provided, one wonders just how eager the principals are to have ideas and views shared with them! A search for “yellow” on their Canadian website doesn’t yield much joy!

In another story, Barry Critchley also highlighted the efforts of Glen Bradford:

If nothing else Glen Bradford, a U.S. investor based in Indianapolis, is determined. And he has a plan to show that determination: to get proxies from owners of 5% of the shares at Yellow Media to call a special meeting of the company that has put forward a recapitalization proposal to be voted on early next month.

Bradford, who owns more than 250,000 Yellow Media preferred shares — and who claims that he has received proxies for more than two million in total — wants shareholders to fill out a form “so that I can call a shareholder meeting with the sole purpose of ensuring that there is a management team in place that understands what fiduciary responsibility is and understands who owns the company.”

Bradford advises the potential form-fillers that “by filling out this form, you agree to oppose the recapitalization plan and believe that it is a breach of fiduciary

Mr. Bradford’s interest in Yellow Media has been discussed on PrefBlog in the post YLO: The Jostling Starts, the Rumours Swirl:

There doesn’t seem to be much on the web about Glen Bradford or ARM Holdings by way of performance numbers, but I dug up his resume.

Since that post, the website has been abandoned and the link is broken.

Somebody using a gMail address purporting to be Mr. Bradford contacted me last night and asked me to post a link to his petition:

If you fill out this form and do not attend the meeting in person, I, Glen Bradford, will assume responsibility for your shares and vote according to my perception of what is best for common shareholders.

By filling out this form, you agree to oppose the recapitalization plan and believe that it is a breach of fiduciary responsibility.

Fill out what you can. I am going to need to be able to tie the share ownership back to you to call the meeting.

I really wouldn’t want to guess whether filling out the form is a valid form of proxy. I think the answer is probably no. I suggest that if you want to give Mr. Bradford your proxy, you should specify this on the form provided to you by the company – but not only am I not a lawyer, but the person purporting to be Mr. Bradford advises me that in addition to not having a website, he also doesn’t have a lawyer. He does, however, have a link to a resume.

I have verified that there is an “ARM Holdings LLC” with CEO Glen Bradford that has filed a Form D with the SEC. but what checking the SEC did and whether there is any connection between the filer of the form and the guy getting all the ink from Barry Critchley is something I simply do not know.

I’m not filling out the Internet form, nor will I be naming Mr. Bradford my proxy when I fill out the proxy documents. While I wish him the best of luck, the campaign is just a shade too Mickey-Mouse for my tastes.

YLO has four series of preferred shares outstanding: YLO.PR.A, YLO.PR.B, YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D. I recommend that preferred shareholders vote against the plan, on the grounds that they are being treated as if they have all be forcibly converted into common at the YLO.PR.A / YLO.PR.B rates prior to the conversion of the old common into new securities. That’s reasonable for YLO.PR.A and YLO.PR.B, but not so much for YLO.PR.C and YLO.PR.D, which are not convertible by the company. And, even for the A & B holders – you’re not getting paid to vote yes, so why give it away? If the company wants a yes vote from you, they should provide a little sweetener; the offer that’s on the table is already a worst-case scenario.