Category: Issue Comments

Issue Comments

CU.PR.A To Be Redeemed

Canadian Utilities has announced:

Canadian Utilities Limited also announced today that it will redeem on July 19, 2012 all of its outstanding Cumulative Redeemable Second Preferred Shares Series W at a price of $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends per share.

CU.PR.A has been tracked by HIMIPref™. It is a member of the PerpetualPremium index and closed Friday at 25.34-40 to yield (7.81%) – (10.56%) based on an immediate call. IIROC halted trading today at 3:12 “pending news”, prior to which the issue had traded 950 shares in a range of 25.34-38.

Issue Comments

IAG Prefs & Sub-Debt on Review-Negative by DBRS

DBRS has announced that it:

has today placed the Subordinated Debt and Preferred Shares ratings of Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. (IAG or the Company) Under Review with Negative Implications. The Claims Paying Rating of IC-2 is not affected by this rating action.

Following the DBRS annual review meetings with IAG management and certain disclosures included in the Company’s Investor Day (June 12, 2012) presentation, DBRS remains concerned that the Company’s exposure to the current low interest rate environment has impaired its financial flexibility at the current rating categories.

The Company’s total debt ratio has increased to 36.6% pro forma the $150 million preferred share issue completed in May 2012, which is above the range established by the DBRS rating methodology for the life insurance industry at the current rating category. Beyond our concerns for the Company’s financial leverage, DBRS observes that the Company continues to have higher-than-average exposures to interest rates by virtue of the relatively large exposure to long-duration life insurance liabilities with embedded interest rate guarantees that are more challenging to meet in the current rate environment.

While the Company is reducing some of its exposure to interest rate risk in the short run through more efficient asset liability matching and forward interest rate locks, and in the longer term through price increases and product redesign, the Company has also suggested that if rates do not increase before year-end 2012, it is likely going to have to take an estimated $120 million charge on account of lower ultimate reinvestment rate assumptions. The Company’s priority is to offset this adverse development with additional one-time earning gains while it waits for a more sustainable interest rate environment.

In the meantime, the Company is operating at a lower Solvency Ratio (the AMF’s MCCSR equivalent) of approximately 186% (March 31, 2012), which, while below the industry average of over 200%, factors in the Company’s inherent conservatism that is estimated to depress the ratio by close to 15 points. Nevertheless, the nine points gained by the addition of $150 million of preferred shares in May was more than absorbed by adverse market developments in April and May, which suggests that the Company and its regulatory capital ratio remain quite vulnerable to exogenous market forces.

With little demonstrable financial flexibility at the current rating category in terms of debt or preferred share capacity and the prospects of continued earnings and market volatility, which has a direct impact on regulatory capital ratios, the Company warrants the Under Review- Negative status at this time. DBRS expects to complete its review of the Company within the next two months.

IAG has the following preferred shares outstanding: IAG.PR.A, IAG.PR.E and IAG.PR.F (DeemedRetractible) and IAG.PR.C & IAG.PR.G (FixedReset). All are tracked by HIMIPref™ and all are assigned to the indicated indices.

Issue Comments

BBD.PR.D To Reset to 255% of GOC5

Bombardier Inc. has announced:

the basis for resetting the dividend rate on its Series 3 Preferred Shares in accordance with the terms applicable to those shares.

Holders of Bombardier Inc. Series 2 Preferred Shares have the right to convert all or part of their shares, effective on August 1, 2012, on a one-for-one basis into Series 3 Preferred Shares. Holders of Series 3 Preferred Shares have the right to convert all or part of their shares, effective on August 1, 2012, on a one-for-one basis into Series 2 Preferred Shares. Holders who do not convert their shares will retain their Series 2 Preferred Shares or Series 3 Preferred Shares, as the case may be.

In the case of the Series 2 Preferred Shares, starting as of August 1, 2012, holders will continue to receive a monthly floating adjustable cash dividend, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of Bombardier Inc., based on a dividend rate equal to a percentage of the prime rate, subject to certain adjustments in accordance with the terms of such shares.

In the case of the Series 3 Preferred Shares, starting as of August 1, 2012, holders will receive a quarterly fixed cash dividend for the following five years, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of Bombardier Inc., based on a fixed rate equal to 255% of the yield on five-year non-callable Government of Canada bonds determined as at July 11, 2012, in accordance with the terms of such shares. The annual dividend rate applicable to the Series 3 Preferred Shares will be published on July 12, 2012 in several newspapers.

Any registered shareholder who wishes to convert his or her Series 2 and/ or Series 3 Preferred Shares must complete and sign the conversion panel contained on the back of the Series 2 or Series 3 Preferred Share certificate as the case may be, and deliver it, at the latest by 5:00 p.m. (Montréal time) on July 18, 2012, to Computershare Investor Services Inc.

Shareholders who are beneficial owners and who wish to exercise their right of conversion should communicate as soon as possible with their broker or other nominee and follow their instructions. In that case, it is important that they follow such instructions and act in the time frame advised so as to provide enough time to their broker or other nominee to meet the July 18, 2012 deadline.

If, after July 18, 2012, Bombardier Inc. determines that there would be less than one million Series 2 Preferred Shares outstanding after the conversion date (being August 1, 2012), then all remaining Series 2 Preferred Shares will automatically be converted into Series 3 Preferred Shares on a one-for-one basis. However, if, after such date, Bombardier Inc. determines that there would be less than one million Series 3 Preferred Shares outstanding after the conversion date (being August 1, 2012), then all remaining Series 3 Preferred Shares will automatically be converted into Series 2 Preferred Shares on a one-for-one basis. In either case, Bombardier Inc. shall give a written notice to that effect to holders of such remaining shares no later than July 25, 2012.

Subject to the conditions mentioned in the previous paragraph, on August 1, 2017, and every five years thereafter, holders of Series 2 Preferred Shares and holders of Series 3 Preferred Shares will have again the right to convert their shares into shares of the other series.

At the current five-year Canada yield (GOC5) of 1.19% (!) the indicated new yield will be 3.0345% or a little over $0.75 p.a. – a steep decline from the current payment of 5.267%, or $1.31675.

I have expressed astonishment in recent editions of PrefLetter that the price differential between BBD.PR.D and BBD.PR.B (the Ratchet Rate issue with which it is interconvertible) has remained so high for so long (closing prices June 14 were 17.75 and 14.90, respectively). But the preferred share market is an inefficient place!

The last arbitrage opportunity was, of course, five years ago. Both BBD.PR.B and BBD.PR.D are tracked by HIMIPref™; both issues are relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

Issue Comments

NEW.PR.C Partial Call for Redemption

Scotia Managed Companies has announced:

NewGrowth Corp. (the “Company”) announced today that it has called 62,784 Preferred Shares for cash redemption on June 26, 2012 (in accordance with the Company’s Articles) representing approximately 2.284% of the outstanding Preferred Shares as a result of the special annual retraction of 62,784 Capital Shares by the holders thereof. The Preferred Shares shall be redeemed on a pro rata basis, so that each holder of Preferred Shares of record on June 22, 2012 will have approximately 2.284% of their Preferred Shares redeemed. The redemption price for the Preferred Shares will be $13.70 per share.

In addition, holders of a further 30 Capital Shares and 30 Preferred Shares have deposited such shares concurrently for retraction on June 26, 2012. As a result, a total of 62,814 Capital Shares and 62,814 Preferred Shares, or approximately 2.285% of both classes of shares currently outstanding, will be redeemed.

Holders of Preferred Shares that are on record for dividends but have been called for redemption will be entitled to receive dividends thereon which have been declared but remain unpaid up to but not including June 26, 2012.

Payment of the amount due to holders of Preferred Shares will be made by the Company on June 26, 2012. From and after June 26, 2012 the holders of Preferred Shares that have been called for redemption will not be entitled to dividends or to exercise any right in respect of such shares except to receive the amount due on redemption.

NewGrowth Corp. is a mutual fund corporation whose investment portfolio consists primarily of publicly listed securities of selected Canadian chartered banks, telecommunication, pipeline and utility issuers. The Capital Shares and Preferred Shares of NewGrowth Corp. are both listed for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols NEW.A and NEW.PR.C respectively.

NEW.PR.C was last mentioned on PrefBlog with respect to last year’s partial call for redemption. NEW.PR.C is tracked by HIMIPref™ but is assigned to the Scraps index on volume concerns.

Issue Comments

LBS.PR.A 2011 Annual Report

Brompton Life & Banc Split Corp. has released its Annual Report to December 31, 2011.

LBS / LBS.PR.A Performance
Instrument One
Year
Three
Years
Five
Years
Whole Unit -11.1% +12.3% -2.5%
LBS -32.4% +24.8% -10.7%
LBS.PR.A +5.4% +5.4% +5.4%
S&P/TSX Capped Financial Index -3.8% +15.0% -0.6%

Note that according to the implementation by iShares, the capped financial index is about 76% banks and 19% insurance, so the fund is by design overweight insurers relative to this benchmark – and insurers have underperformed.

Figures of interest are:

MER: 1.02% of the whole unit value, “excluding the cost of leverage and issuance costs.”

Average Net Assets: We need this to calculate portfolio yield. The Total Assets of the fund at year end was $204.4-million, compared to $190.8-million a year prior (there was an increase in shares outstanding due to a warrant offering), so call it an average of $198-million. This can be checked by examining distributions on preferred shares of $7.164-million, which at $0.525 / share implies an average of 13.6-million units outstanding, which at an average value of $16.75 implies average net assets of 227.8-million. Since the warrants were exercised in late March, 2011, the latter figure seems more appropriate.

Underlying Portfolio Yield: Investment income of $9.232-million received divided by average net assets of $227.8-million is 4.05%.

Income Coverage: Net investment income after expenses of $6.942-million received plus $0.048-million issuance costs added back is $6.990-million, to cover preferred dividends of 7.164-million is about 98%.

LBS.PR.A was last mentioned on PrefBlog when their 12H1 Semi-annual report was discussed.

Issue Comments

LFE.PR.A: Recirculating?

Yesterday, in the post LFE.PR.A Tight-Lipped Regarding Special Retraction Results I expressed my irritation that results of the Special Retraction for LFE.PR.A had not been reported by the company immediately following the effective date of the Special Retraction.

I eMailed the company:

Knowledge of the consolidation ratio is critical to evaluation of the credit quality of LFE.PR.A and the option value of LFE.

What purpose is served by the delay?

Sincerely,

… and received a reply …

In the best interest of the shareholders, the Company has an obligation to attempt to recirculate the shares submitted for the special retraction, prior to the payment date. Therefore it does not mean that all shares submitted for the special retraction will be cancelled. Any cancellations will not occur until after the June 19th payment date.

Well, fair enough, although I consider it rather odd that the company is holding the position as treasury shares for almost three weeks.

Say that: (i) they have not yet raised the cash, and (ii) the underlying portfolio value plummets. Then they’re screwed, because they have, effectively, levered up the portfolio in a down market.

So to avoid this possibility, one might assume that a prudent person would have raised the cash as of the NAV calculation date (May 31).

So say that: (i) they have raised the cash, and (ii) the underlying portfolio value skyrockets. This gets a little complex, so say there were two units outstanding May 30, of which one was retracted May 31 at a price of $11. They raise the cash, so that their assets on May 31 are $11 securities and $11 cash, against two units outstanding, one of which is a treasury unit.

Then the underlying doubles, so on June 17 their assets are $22 securities and $11 cash, with two units outstanding, one of which started the period as a treasury. The unitholders will be happy or sad to the extent to which the company was able to sell units at prices reflecting their ability to invest the cash in the underlying portfolio. It gets a little hairy, especially when there are two classes of shares to worry about.

Attempting to recirculate units after the calculation of the cash payment obligation seems like a risky enterprise to me. But, of course, the numbers have been chose to make understanding simpler – the underlying portfolio is unlikely to either double or halve in the three week holding period.

In fact, they might well get away with it, given that the Capital Units are trading at a fat premium to the intrinsic value reported on May 31, which was $11.32. Despite this, the low price for the entire period for the capital units by the Toronto Stock Exchange was $1.70.

Those who have seen my seminar on SplitShares will know there is nothing automatically wrong with capital units trading at a premium – they can, to a certain extent, be modelled as options and may have time value that can be quite considerable. There’s more discussion of this nuance (for free, you cheap bastards) in the post Split Share Capital Unit Debate. But – and it’s a big but, as the Bishop said to the Actress – there will be a considerable cash drag on the portfolio following the reorganization and any attempt to model the capital units as options have to include this effect. I’m sure a lot of models don’t.

One way or another, however, I suspect that the company will be successful in flogging any Capital Units retracted for a price in excess of their redemption price of $1.32. Just what might happen to the preferred shares is much less clear. We shall see!

Issue Comments

IAG.PR.A Market-Maker Falls Asleep!

Assiduous Reader KB writes in and says:

I’m confused about something that happens once in a while and maybe you can clear it up.

There are lots of illiquid preferred shares, and they often have wide spreads. That’s fine as long as everyone is behaving.

If I want to purchase some shares and there isn’t available size at the ask, I have found the shares usually appear if you meet the ask price. I assume the market maker offers up the shares that are required. Same situation on the sell side.

But once in a while like today, I was watching one of my preferred’s (IAG.PR.A) since yesterday it took a rather strange drop in value that you had commented on in the PrefBlog.

Today at 1:13 PM 34 shares changed hands at a reasonable $23.65. Then at 2:56 PM 700 shares traded at $21.71 and 50 shares at $21.66. That’s ridiculous.

My questions is: Where do these shares come from? National Bank bought and sold the 700 and Desjardins sold the remaining 50 to National Bank.

Do these shares come from the market maker or were there people actually willing to sell at that price? You’ve not touched on this subject in PrefLetter or in PrefBlog and the internet doesn’t reveal much, so I decided to ask you directly. Maybe you’re
just as confused as I am.

Actually, I’ve discussed it earlier in the post Fed Up with Shoddy Market-Making!. It was as a result of my frustration with the system that I started publishing the “Wide Spread Highlights” table every day and it was due to my complaints on the topic that I discovered the TMX Close != Last pricing data fiasco.

At vast expense, I have purchased the day’s “Trades and Quotes” file for IAG.PR.A from the TSX. From 9:30 until 4:00 there were 1,023 quotes and three trades.

Easy part first: National was the seller of an odd lot at the offering price and the buyer of an odd lot at the bid price. This almost certainly means that National is the Market Maker. As discussed in the post linked above, Market Makers are required to, among other things, service odd-lot orders at the quote, in exchange for which they receive certain privileges.

The action from 2:55:31 until 2:57:49 is of great interest:

IAG.PR.A
Time Quote Trade
2:55:31 21.66-23.65, 1×2  
2:56:19 21.66-94, 1×2  
2:56:19   700 @ 21.71 (National Bank Cross)
2:56:20 21.66-23.65, 1×2  
2:56:20   50 @ 21.66 (National Bank purchase from Desjardins)
2:57:49 22.00-23.65, 4×2  

All day long the offer was at 23.65, with the exception of less than one second (time-stamping on the file available to me is precise only as to the second), at 2:56:19, when the offer suddenly declined to 21.94, making the spread 0.28. In the same second the trade of 700 shares occured, and in the next second the offer moved back to the 23.65 level, where it was for 6:29:59 of the trading day which lasted 6:30:00.

I must admit that I am very curious about this sequence of events and it does not seem credible that the sudden sharp decline of the offer price was entirely unrelated to the trade of 700 shares that occured during the same single second that the offer was so low. However, I am insufficiently knowledgable regarding the rules to know whether it is legal to front-run an incoming order by changing quote to make the fill seem more reasonable – certainly, if the quote had been 21.66-94 all day long, then a fill of a market order at 21.71 by an internal trade-matching algorithm would be quite reasonable and greatly appreciated.

It is unclear as to whether any front-running occurred at all, even if the change in quote and trade were related. It would be entirely rational for someone to place a limit order inside the quote (well inside the quote, in this case!) and then convert the order to a market order if not immediately filled – although the identity of the broker showing the 21.94 offer for one second is not available in the data I have, and the size was only 200 shares. It would be somewhat more normal for the offer to be allowed to stand for more than a second, as well. However, as became glaringly apparent during the Flash Crash, individual decisions made in the design of protocols and trading algorithms can start looking rather silly when conditions are different from those envisaged at design-time.

I will also point out that the data available to me reflect only the TMX data – I do not have a consolidated tape that would include quotations from Alpha, Pure, etc.

And finally, I will point out that I don’t really understand the relative identities of the buyers and sellers. It strains credulity to imagine that National’s cross of 700 shares was completely unrelated to the sale of 50 shares by Desjardins to National that occurred one second later; but definitive information regarding the precise order flow (back to the actual beneficial owner) is not available to me.

So I will leave it to those more familiar with the intricacies of UMIR and with more access to consolidated tapes to determine whether any jiggery-pokery occured.

All one can do is ask questions – the following eMail has been sent to the Exchange:

On 2012-6-7, the offer price reported by the TMX for IAG.PR.A was 23.65 for the entire day, except for one second commencing 14:56:19. In that second the offer price changed to 21.94 and a cross was executed at 21.71, which was down 1.87 from the closing price on 2012-6-6.

The time-weighted average spread for the full trading session was, according to my calculations using data supplied by the Toronto Stock Exchange, $1.47. The quoted spread exceeded this figure for over four hours in the course of the trading day (to be precise, 4:13:53) and was between $1.95 and $2.00 for nearly all this time (4:10:09).

Can you tell me:
i) Who is the market maker for this security?
ii) What commitments has the market maker made to the exchange regarding the bid-offer spread to be maintained for this security?
iii) When was the last review of the market-maker’s success in meeting the commitments made with respect to bid-offer spread?
iv) What were the results of the last review specified by (iii)?

Sincerely,

Issue Comments

EMA.PR.C Soft on Good Volume

Emera has announced:

that it has completed its public offering of ten million Cumulative Rate Reset First Preferred Shares, Series C for aggregate gross proceeds of $250 million. The offering was first announced on May 29, 2012 when Emera entered into an agreement with a syndicate of underwriters in Canada led by Scotiabank, RBC Capital Markets and TD Securities Inc.

The net proceeds of the offering will be used for general corporate purposes.

EMA.PR.C is a FixedReset, 4.10%+265, announced May 29. The issue will be tracked by HIMIPref™, but assigned to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

EMA.PR.C traded 503,021 shares today in a range of 24.75-87 before closing at 24.81-84, 25×2. Vital statistics are:

EMA.PR.C FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-06-07
Maturity Price : 23.04
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 3.77 %
Issue Comments

VNR.PR.A Firm on Good Volume

Valener Inc. has announced:

the closing of the previously announced public offering of Cumulative Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Shares”). Valener issued a total of 4,000,000 Series A Preferred Shares at a price of $25.00 per Series A Preferred Share, for gross proceeds of $100,000,000. The offering was made on a bought deal basis through a syndicate of underwriters co-led by BMO Capital Markets and TD Securities Inc.

The Series A Preferred Shares commence trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange today under the symbol VNR.PR.A.

“We are pleased that Valener has successfully completed its first distribution of Preferred Shares, which reflects the confidence the financial markets have in our company”, Mr. Pierre Monahan, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Valener, stated.

The net proceeds of the offering will be used by Valener to subscribe to additional units of Gaz Métro Limited Partnership (“Gaz Métro”) in order for Gaz Métro to finance part of its proposed acquisition of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the “CVPS Acquisition”) and any balance, for general corporate purposes. In the event the CVPS Acquisition does not proceed, Valener will use the net proceeds of the offering to repay amounts under its credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

Note that the issue size was upsized following announcement of the issue.

VNR.PR.A is a FixedReset, 4.35%+281, announced May 15. The issue will be tracked by HIMIPref™ and assigned to the FixedResets subindex.

VNR.PR.A traded 400,176 shares today in a range of 25.10-18 before closing at 25.14-15, 21×26. Vital statistics are:

VNR.PR.A FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2042-06-06
Maturity Price : 23.19
Evaluated at bid price : 25.15
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %
Better Communication, Please!

LFE.PR.A Tight-Lipped Regarding Special Retraction Results

It will be recalled that LFE.PR.A is undergoing a reorganization; a very important part of this reorganization was:

Shareholders who do not wish to remain invested in the Company under its reorganized share structure will have until the close of business on May 17, 2012 to provide the Company with notice through their CDS participant that they wish to have their Preferred Shares or Class A Shares redeemed pursuant to the 2012 Special Retraction Right, and to surrender their Shares for retraction. On such a special retraction, each holder of a Preferred Share will receive the lesser of (i) $10.00 and (ii) the net asset value per Unit calculated on May 31, 2012; while holder of a Class A Share will receive the net asset value per Unit calculated on May 31, 2012, less $10.00. Shareholders interested in exercising such retraction right should contact the CDS Participant through which they hold the Shares for further information and instructions as to how to exercise this right. Shareholders should note that the requirements of any particular CDS Participant may vary, and that Shareholders may need to inform their CDS Participant of any intention to exercise this retraction right in advance of the May 17 deadline. Payment for the Class A Shares or Preferred Shares so tendered for retraction pursuant to the 2012 Special Retraction Right will be made no later than June 19, 2012.

So – the company has known what the consolidation ratio was going to be for which issue (either the capital units or the preferreds) since … oh, call it the morning of May 18. In my innocence, I had assumed that the details of the consolidation would be made available on the NAV date of May 31 (or June 1, anyway!):

If more Class A Shares are tendered for retraction under the 2012 Special Retraction Right than Preferred Shares, the outstanding Preferred Shares will be consolidated so that following the retraction pursuant to the 2012 Special Retraction Right there would be an equal number of Preferred Shares and Class A Shares outstanding. Similarly, if more Preferred Shares are tendered for retraction than Class A Shares, the outstanding Class A shares will be consolidated so that again there would be an equal number of Preferred Shares and Class A Shares outstanding following implementation of the 2012 Special Retraction Right. The Company may implement this consolidation by adjusting the number of 2012 Preferred Shares, 2013 Warrants and 2014 Warrants to be issued to holders of Preferred Shares, in the event a consolidation of Preferred Shares is required.

No announcement has yet been made, so I inquired; the answer received was:

A news release will likely be disseminated close to the June 19th Special Retraction payment date.

Knowing the consolidation ratio is critical when evaluating credit quality of LFE.PR.A; it is also critical when evaluating the option value of LFE. But good old Quadravest is going to keep us in the dark; and I cannot even begin to fathom the purpose behind the delay.

All I can suggest is that according to the 2011 Financials, there were 10,712,753 units outstanding on 2011-11-30 and this number is reflected for each part of the unit on the TMX Money Website. Another possibility is to check SEDAR for filings that are only semi-publicized.

What a total waste of time.