Archive for September, 2018

BCE.PR.Q To Reset At 4.812%

Wednesday, September 5th, 2018

BCE Inc. has announced:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

1. Holders of BCE Inc. fixed-rate Series AQ Preferred Shares have the right to convert all or part of their shares, effective on October 1, 2018, on a one-for-one basis, into floating-rate Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AR of BCE Inc. (the “Series AR Preferred Shares”). In order to convert their shares, holders must exercise their right of conversion during the conversion period, which runs from September 4, 2018 until 5:00 p.m. (Montréal/Toronto time) on September 14, 2018.

2. Holders not wishing to convert or who do not comply with the instructions set out in paragraph 3 below by the appropriate deadline will, subject to paragraph 6 below, retain their Series AQ Preferred Shares and, accordingly, will continue to receive a fixed quarterly dividend as described in paragraph 4 below. However, but subject to paragraph 6 below, on September 30, 2023, and every five years thereafter, holders of both Series AQ Preferred Shares and Series AR Preferred Shares will have the right to convert their shares into shares of the other series.

3. In order to exercise its conversion right in respect of all or part of its Series AQ Preferred Shares, the registered holder must provide a written notice thereof, accompanied by its Series AQ Preferred Share certificates with the transfer form on the back thereof or other appropriate stock transfer power of attorney duly endorsed, and deliver them, at the latest by 5:00 p.m. (Montréal/Toronto time) on September 14, 2018, to one of the following addresses of AST Trust Company (Canada):
By Mail:
By Personal Delivery, Courier or Registered Mail:
P.O. Box 1036 Adelaide Street Postal Station Toronto, (Ontario) M5C 2K4
CANADA Attention: Corporate Actions
1 Toronto Street, Suite 1200
Toronto (Ontario) M5C 2V6
CANADA
Attention: Corporate Actions
Delivery may be done in person, by courier, by registered mail or by mail. However, if share certificates are delivered by courier, by registered mail or by mail, the registered shareholder must ensure that they are sent sufficiently in advance so that they are received by AST Trust Company (Canada) by the above-mentioned deadline.
Beneficial holders who wish to exercise their conversion right should communicate with their broker or other nominee to obtain instructions for exercising such right during the conversion period.

4. The Series AQ Preferred Shares will, should they remain outstanding, pay, on a quarterly basis, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE Inc., a fixed cash dividend for the following five years that will be based on a fixed rate equal to the sum of: (a) the yield to maturity compounded semi-annually (the “Government of Canada Yield”), computed on August 31, 2018 in accordance with the articles of BCE Inc., of a Canadian dollar denominated non-callable Government of Canada bond with a term to maturity of five years, and (b) 2.64%. The “Government of Canada Yield” computed on August 31, 2018 is 2.172%. Accordingly, the annual fixed dividend rate applicable to the Series AQ Preferred Shares for the period of five years beginning on September 30, 2018 will be 4.812%.

5. The Series AR Preferred Shares, if issued, will pay, for each quarterly period beginning with the quarterly period from and including September 30, 2018 up to but excluding December 31, 2018, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE Inc., a quarterly floating dividend rate equal to the “Floating Quarterly Dividend Rate” for such quarterly period. The “Floating Quarterly Dividend Rate” for any such quarterly period shall be equal to the rate, expressed as a percentage, equal to the sum of: (a) the “T-Bill Rate”, calculated in accordance with the articles of BCE Inc. on the 30th day prior to the first day of the new quarterly period, and (b) 2.64%, calculated on the basis of the actual number of days in such quarterly period divided by 365. The “T-Bill Rate” means, for any quarterly period, the average yield expressed as a percentage per annum on three-month Government of Canada Treasury Bills, as reported by the Bank of Canada, for the most recent treasury bills auction preceding the applicable calculation date. The “Floating Quarterly Dividend Rate” computed on August 31, 2018 and applicable to the Series AR Preferred Shares for the quarterly period beginning on September 30, 2018 will be 1.04578% (annual rate of 4.149%, based on an initial T-Bill Rate of 1.509%).

6. After the end of the conversion period on September 14, 2018, if BCE Inc. determines that there would be less than 1,000,000 Series AQ Preferred Shares outstanding after the conversion date (October 1, 2018), BCE Inc. will automatically convert all remaining Series AQ Preferred Shares into Series AR Preferred Shares. However, if BCE Inc. determines that there would be less than 1,000,000 Series AR Preferred Shares outstanding after the conversion date, then no Series AQ Preferred Shares will be converted into Series AR Preferred Shares.

7. For any questions about the steps to be followed, please contact AST Trust Company (Canada) at 1-800-561-0934, the transfer agent and registrar for BCE Inc.’s preferred shares.

DATED in Montréal, this 31st day of August, 2018
(signed)
Glen LeBlanc
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
BCE Inc.

BCE.PR.Q is a FixedReset that came into being through an Exchange from BAF.PR.E which in turn commenced trading 2013-2-14 as a FixedReset, 4.25%+264, after being announced 2013-1-30.

The most logical way to analyze the question of whether or not to convert is through the theory of Preferred Pairs, for which a calculator is available. Briefly, a Strong Pair is defined as a pair of securities that can be interconverted in the future (e.g., BCE.PR.Q and the FloatingReset that will exist if enough holders convert). Since they will be interconvertible on this future date, it may be assumed that they will be priced identically on this date (if they aren’t then holders will simply convert en masse to the higher-priced issue). And since they will be priced identically on a given date in the future, any current difference in price must be offset by expectations of an equal and opposite value of dividends to be received in the interim. And since the dividend rate on one element of the pair is both fixed and known, the implied average rate of the other, floating rate, instrument can be determined. Finally, we say, we may compare these average rates and take a view regarding the actual future course of that rate relative to the implied rate, which will provide us with guidance on which element of the pair is likely to outperform the other until the next interconversion date, at which time the process will be repeated.

We can show the break-even rates for each FixedReset / FloatingReset Strong Pair graphically by plotting the implied average 3-month bill rate against the next Exchange Date (which is the date to which the average will be calculated).

pairs_fr_180904
Click for Big

The market appears to be relatively uninterested in floating rate product; the implied rates until the next interconversion bracket the current 3-month bill rate as the averages for investment-grade and junk issues are at +1.44% and +1.34%, respectively. Whatever might be the result of the next few Bank of Canada overnight rate decisions, I suggest that it is unlikely that the average rate over the next five years will be lower than current – but if you disagree, of course, you may interpret the data any way you like.

Since credit quality of each element of the pair is equal to the other element, it should not make any difference whether the pair examined is investment-grade or junk, although we might expect greater variation of implied rates between junk issues on grounds of lower liquidity, and this is just what we see.

If we plug in the current bid price of the BCE.PR.Q FixedReset, we may construct the following table showing consistent prices for its soon-may-be-issued FloatingReset counterpart given a variety of Implied Breakeven yields consistent with issues currently trading:

Estimate of FloatingReset (received in exchange for BCE.PR.Q) Trading Price In Current Conditions
  Assumed FloatingReset
Price if Implied Bill
is equal to
FixedReset Bid Price Spread 2.00% 1.50% 1.00%
BCE.PR.Q 24.56 264bp 24.39 23.88 23.37

Based on current market conditions, I suggest that the FloatingResets that will result from conversion are likely to be cheap and trading below the price of their FixedReset counterparts. Therefore, it seems likely that I will recommend that holders of BCE.PR.Q continue to hold the issue and not to convert, but I will wait until it’s closer to the September 14 notification deadline before making a final pronouncement. I will note that once the FloatingResets commence trading (if, in fact, they do) it may be a good trade to swap the FixedReset for the FloatingReset in the market once both elements of each pair are trading and you can – presumably, according to this analysis – do it with a reasonably good take-out in price, rather than doing it through the company on a 1:1 basis. But that, of course, will depend on the prices at that time and your forecast for the path of policy rates over the next five years. There are no guarantees – my recommendation is based on the assumption that current market conditions with respect to the pairs will continue until the FloatingResets commence trading and that the relative pricing of the two new pairs will reflect these conditions.

New Issue : TD FixedReset, 4.75%+259

Tuesday, September 4th, 2018

As noted by Assiduous Reader FletcherLynd, The Toronto-Dominion Bank has announced:

a domestic public offering of Non-Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares (non-viability contingent capital (NVCC)), Series 20 (the “Series 20 Shares”).

TD has entered into an agreement with a group of underwriters led by TD Securities Inc. to issue, on a bought deal basis, 10 million Series 20 Shares at a price of $25.00 per share to raise gross proceeds of $250 million. TD has also granted the underwriters an option to purchase, on the same terms, up to an additional 2 million Series 20 Shares. This option is exercisable in whole or in part by the underwriters at any time up to two business days prior to closing.

The Series 20 Shares will yield 4.75% annually, with dividends payable quarterly, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of TD, for the initial period ending October 31, 2023. Thereafter, the dividend rate will reset every five years at a level of 2.59% over the then five-year Government of Canada bond yield.

Subject to regulatory approval, on October 31, 2023 and on October 31 every 5 years thereafter, TD may redeem the Series 20 Shares, in whole or in part, at $25.00 per share. Subject to TD’s right of redemption and certain other conditions, holders of the Series 20 Shares will have the right to convert their shares into Non-Cumulative Floating Rate Preferred Shares (NVCC), Series 21 (the “Series 21 Shares”), on October 31, 2023, and on October 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of the Series 21 Shares will be entitled to receive quarterly floating rate dividends, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of TD, equal to the three-month Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 2.59%.

The expected closing date is September 13, 2018. TD will make an application to list the Series 20 Shares as of the closing date on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The net proceeds of the offering will be used for general corporate purposes.

They later announced:

that as a result of strong investor demand for its previously announced domestic public offering of Non-Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares (non-viability contingent capital (NVCC)), Series 20 (the “Series 20 Shares”), the size of the offering has been increased to 16 million Series 20 Shares. The gross proceeds of the offering will now be $400 million. The offering will be underwritten by a group of underwriters led by TD Securities Inc.

The expected closing date is September 13, 2018. TD will make an application to list the Series 20 Shares as of the closing date on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The net proceeds of the offering will be used for general corporate purposes.

The new issue is quite expensive according to Implied Volatility Analysis:

impvol_td_180904
Click for Big

According to this analysis, the fair value of the new issue on September 4 is 24.38.

The ludicrously high figure of Implied Volatility is something I take to mean that the underlying assumption of the Black-Scholes model, that of no directionality of prices, is not accepted by the market; the market seems to be taking the view that since things seem rosy now, they will always be rosy and everything will trade near par in the future.

I balk at ascribing a 100% probability to the ‘all issues will be called, or at least exhibit price stability’ hypothesis. There may still be a few old geezers amongst the Assiduous Readers of this blog who can still (faintly) remember the Great Bear Market of 2014-16, in which quite a few similar assumptions made earlier turned out to be slightly inaccurate. The extra cushion implied by an Issue Reset Spread that is well over the market spread is worth something, even if nothing gets called.

Or, to put it another way, one can buy a whole lot of downside protection for very little extra money, relative to this issue. For instance, TD.PF.E, FixedReset, 3.70%+287, is bid at 24.92 (theoretical fair value of 25.06, according to the above analysis, which ignores the interim dividend shortfall). You’re giving up about $0.25 p.a. in dividends until it resets 2020-10-31, sure, but you’re getting a significant amount of protection in the event of a market downturn, and a bit more dividend afterwards. Is it worth it? Well, that will depend a lot on your aversion to loss … I’m just saying that buying the same amount of protection costs more in most other series of FixedResets.

DC.PR.E : Huffing and Puffing Begins

Tuesday, September 4th, 2018

Tim Kiladze wrote a piece in the Globe today titled Dundee Corp. faces investor spat over preferred share repayment:

On Tuesday, Maryland-based Roumell Asset Management, which says it holds 3.6 million shares, or 6.4 per cent of Dundee, released a public letter to the company’s board of directors asking for Dundee’s preferred shares that come due in 2019 to be extended and given a new, discounted price.

Dundee declined to comment Tuesday, but on an August conference call, executive chairman Jonathan Goodman addressed the complexity of the matter. “We’re in the very unique position that the preferred shareholders don’t want us to give them stock and neither do a lot of the common shareholders. But I think we have to be pragmatic,” he said, alluding to the company’s cash levels.

Assiduous Readers will remember that I wrote about DC.PR.E in August – that post contains links to posts from all the huffing and puffing in 2016 about the previous arrangement that gave rise to the existence of the issue.

The Roumell letter advocates:

We believe the company should offer the current Series 5 preferred shareholders appropriately discounted (from par value), and extended, preferred shares. Dundee’s financial position has deteriorated significantly since January 2016 and the discount offered to the Series 5 preferred shareholders must reflect this new reality. In the absence of the Series 5 preferred shareholders accepting a newly discounted, and extended, security, Roumell Asset Management would support honoring the obligation by issuing common stock. While we speak only for ourselves, we believe other large shareholders view the situation similarly.

So who’s Roumell? They run a fund:

The Roumell Opportunistic Value Fund (Institutional share/RAMSX) follows the same deep-value, Opportunistic Capital Allocation (OCA) strategy that we have adhered to since 1998. The Roumell Opportunistic Value Fund seeks to achieve its objective by holding a combination of equity, debt and cash reflecting a broad mandate to pursue value where we find it. In the absence of sufficient investment opportunities, the Fund will hold cash. The Fund is managed by Jim Roumell.

The appropriate benchmark for this kind of fund is difficult to determine, but they mention the Russell 2000 Value Index in their quarterly fact sheet, so let’s go with that until we’re told differently. The fund has achieved an “Average Annual Total Return as of Quarter Ending 6/30/2018” of 0.77% over the past five years compared to 11.72% for the Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares VRTVX in the five years to 2018-8-31. Sorry about the period mismatch, but it seems we’re not talking about fractions of a basis point here! Let’s just say I’m not busy mortgaging my house so I can place money with Roumell! They do give returns for other strategies in the 18Q2 Investors’ Letter … you can decide for yourselves whether you want to mortgage your houses.

DC.PR.E closed at 18.47 today … a good bounce off the lows, but hardly a vote of confidence in the company’s ability to redeem at par next year.

MAPF Performance : August, 2018

Monday, September 3rd, 2018

Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund’s Net Asset Value per Unit as of the close August 31, 2018, was $10.4276.

Returns to August 31, 2018
Period MAPF BMO-CM “50” Preferred Share Index TXPR*
Total Return
CPD – according to Blackrock
One Month +0.64% +0.59% +0.80% N/A
Three Months +2.36% +2.23% +2.24% N/A
One Year +11.56% +8.73% +6.89% +6.42%
Two Years (annualized) +17.96% +12.91% +10.76% N/A
Three Years (annualized) +12.13% +9.44% +7.97% +7.32%
Four Years (annualized) +4.23% +2.81% +1.57% N/A
Five Years (annualized) +5.62% +3.34% +2.57% +2.07%
Six Years (annualized) +4.48% +2.84% +1.96% N/A
Seven Years (annualized) +4.45% +3.25% +2.42% N/A
Eight Years (annualized) +5.68% +4.17% +3.16% N/A
Nine Years (annualized) +6.10% +4.40% +3.47% N/A
Ten Years (annualized) +10.45% +4.80% +3.77% +3.20%
Eleven Years (annualized) +9.32% +3.82% +2.91%  
Twelve Years (annualized) +8.81% +3.53%    
Thirteen Years (annualized) +8.59% +3.54%    
Fourteen Years (annualized) +8.44% +3.64%    
Fifteen Years (annualized) +9.05% +3.79%    
Sixteen Years (annualized) +9.61% +3.95%    
Seventeen Years (annualized) +9.47% +3.91%    
MAPF returns assume reinvestment of distributions, and are shown after expenses but before fees.
The full name of the BMO-CM “50” index is the BMO Capital Markets “50” Preferred Share Index. It is calculated without accounting for fees.
“TXPR” is the S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index. It is calculated without accounting for fees, but does assume reinvestment of dividends.
CPD Returns are for the NAV and are after all fees and expenses. Reinvestment of dividends is assumed.
Figures for National Bank Preferred Equity Income Fund (formerly Omega Preferred Equity) (which are after all fees and expenses) for 1-, 3- and 12-months are +0.54%, +1.87% and +5.96%, respectively, according to Morningstar after all fees & expenses. Three year performance is +7.54%; five year is +3.20%; ten year is +4.14%
Manulife Preferred Income Class Adv has been terminated by Manulife.
Figures for Horizons Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR) (which are after all fees and expenses) for 1-, 3- and 12-months are +0.74%, +2.23% & +7.93%, respectively. Three year performance is +9.49%, five-year is +3.97%
Figures for National Bank Preferred Equity Fund (formerly Altamira Preferred Equity Fund) are +0.64%, +2.0% and +7.00% for one-, three- and twelve months, respectively. Three year performance is +8.67%; five-year is +2.78%

According to the fund’s fact sheet as of June 30, 2016, the fund’s inception date was October 30, 2015. I do not know how they justify this nonsensical statement, but will assume that prior performance is being suppressed in some perfectly legal manner that somebody at National considers ethical.

The figures for the NAV of BMO S&P/TSX Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR) is +7.26% for the past twelve months. Two year performance is +12.98%, three year is +8.31%, five year is +0.76%.
Figures for Natixis Canadian Preferred Share Class Series F (formerly NexGen Canadian Preferred Share Tax Managed Fund) are +0.82%, +2.01% and +5.32% for one-, three- and twelve-months, respectively. Three year performance is +7.90%; five-year is +4.51%
Figures for BMO Preferred Share Fund (advisor series) according to Morningstar are +0.81%, +2.00% and +4.71% for the past one-, three- and twelve-months, respectively. Three year performance is +5.62%; five-year is +1.17%.
Figures for PowerShares Canadian Preferred Share Index Class, Series F are +6.96% for the past twelve months. The three-year figure is +9.79%; five years is +3.06%
Figures for the First Asset Preferred Share Investment Trust (PSF.UN) are no longer available since the fund has merged with First Asset Preferred Share ETF (FPR)
Figures for Lysander-Slater Preferred Share Dividend Fund according to Morningstar are +1.06%, +2.47% and +5.90% for the past one, three and twelve months, respectively. Three year performance is +6.39%.
Figures for the Desjardins Canadian Preferred Share Fund A Class, as reported by Morningstar are +0.64%, +1.97% and +5.79% for the past one, three and twelve months, respectively.

MAPF returns assume reinvestment of dividends, and are shown after expenses but before fees. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund or any other fund. For more information, see the fund’s main page. The fund is available either directly from Hymas Investment Management or through a brokerage account at Odlum Brown Limited.

The preferred share market seems to have paused its strong advance from the lows of late 2014 to early 2016, but I think that there is still room for outsized gains. The Seniority Spread (the interest-equivalent yield on reasonably liquid, investment-grade PerpetualDiscounts less the yield on long term corporate bonds) is still quite elevated (chart end-date 2018-8-10)

pl_180810_body_chart_1
Click for Big

… and the relationship between five-year Canada yields and yields on investment-grade FixedResets is also well within what I consider ‘decoupled panic’ territory (chart end-date 2018-8-10):

pl_180810_body_chart_5
Click for Big

In addition, I feel that the yield on five-year Canadas is unsustainably low (it should be the inflation rate plus an increment of … 1%? 1.5%? 2.0%?),and a return to sustainable levels is likely over the medium term.

FixedReset performance on the month was +0.81% vs. PerpetualDiscounts of +0.68% in August; over the past three months, the former class has outperformed slightly.:

himi_indexperf_180831
Click for Big

Floaters lost a little ground on the month, as they returned -1.68% for August and +30.0% for the past twelve months. But look at the long-term performance:

himi_floaterperf_180831
Click for Big

Some Assiduous Readers will be interested to observe that the ‘Quantitative Easing’ decline was not as bad as the ‘Credit Crunch’ decline, which took the sector down to the point where the 15-year cumulative total return was negative. I wrote about that at the time and still can’t get over it. Fifteen years!

As for the future, of course, it’s one thing to say that ‘spreads are unsustainable and so are government yields’ and it’s quite another to forecast just how and when a more economically sustainable environment will take effect. It could be years. There could be a reversal, particularly if Trump’s international trade policies cause a severe recession or even a depression. And, of course, I could be just plain wrong about the sustainability of the current environment.

I think that a broad, sustainable rally in FixedResets will require higher five-year Canada yields (or a widespread expectation of them) … and although I’m sure this will happen eventually, it would be foolish to speculate on just when it will happen!

Calculation of MAPF Sustainable Income Per Unit
Month NAVPU Portfolio
Average
YTW
Leverage
Divisor
Securities
Average
YTW
Capital
Gains
Multiplier
Sustainable
Income
per
current
Unit
June, 2007 9.3114 5.16% 1.03 5.01% 1.3240 0.3524
September 9.1489 5.35% 0.98 5.46% 1.3240 0.3773
December, 2007 9.0070 5.53% 0.942 5.87% 1.3240 0.3993
March, 2008 8.8512 6.17% 1.047 5.89% 1.3240 0.3938
June 8.3419 6.034% 0.952 6.338% 1.3240 $0.3993
September 8.1886 7.108% 0.969 7.335% 1.3240 $0.4537
December, 2008 8.0464 9.24% 1.008 9.166% 1.3240 $0.5571
March 2009 $8.8317 8.60% 0.995 8.802% 1.3240 $0.5872
June 10.9846 7.05% 0.999 7.057% 1.3240 $0.5855
September 12.3462 6.03% 0.998 6.042% 1.3240 $0.5634
December 2009 10.5662 5.74% 0.981 5.851% 1.1141 $0.5549
March 2010 10.2497 6.03% 0.992 6.079% 1.1141 $0.5593
June 10.5770 5.96% 0.996 5.984% 1.1141 $0.5681
September 11.3901 5.43% 0.980 5.540% 1.1141 $0.5664
December 2010 10.7659 5.37% 0.993 5.408% 1.0298 $0.5654
March, 2011 11.0560 6.00% 0.994 5.964% 1.0298 $0.6403
June 11.1194 5.87% 1.018 5.976% 1.0298 $0.6453
September 10.2709 6.10%
Note
1.001 6.106% 1.0298 $0.6090
December, 2011 10.0793 5.63%
Note
1.031 5.805% 1.0000 $0.5851
March, 2012 10.3944 5.13%
Note
0.996 5.109% 1.0000 $0.5310
June 10.2151 5.32%
Note
1.012 5.384% 1.0000 $0.5500
September 10.6703 4.61%
Note
0.997 4.624% 1.0000 $0.4934
December, 2012 10.8307 4.24% 0.989 4.287% 1.0000 $0.4643
March, 2013 10.9033 3.87% 0.996 3.886% 1.0000 $0.4237
June 10.3261 4.81% 0.998 4.80% 1.0000 $0.4957
September 10.0296 5.62% 0.996 5.643% 1.0000 $0.5660
December, 2013 9.8717 6.02% 1.008 5.972% 1.0000 $0.5895
March, 2014 10.2233 5.55% 0.998 5.561% 1.0000 $0.5685
June 10.5877 5.09% 0.998 5.100% 1.0000 $0.5395
September 10.4601 5.28% 0.997 5.296% 1.0000 $0.5540
December, 2014 10.5701 4.83% 1.009 4.787% 1.0000 $0.5060
March, 2015 9.9573 4.99% 1.001 4.985% 1.0000 $0.4964
June, 2015 9.4181 5.55% 1.002 5.539% 1.0000 $0.5217
September 7.8140 6.98% 0.999 6.987% 1.0000 $0.5460
December, 2015 8.1379 6.85% 0.997 6.871% 1.0000 $0.5592
March, 2016 7.4416 7.79% 0.998 7.805% 1.0000 $0.5808
June 7.6704 7.67% 1.011 7.587% 1.0000 $0.5819
September 8.0590 7.35% 0.993 7.402% 1.0000 $0.5965
December, 2016 8.5844 7.24% 0.990 7.313% 1.0000 $0.6278
March, 2017 9.3984 6.26% 0.994 6.298% 1.0000 $0.5919
June 9.5313 6.41% 0.998 6.423% 1.0000 $0.6122
September 9.7129 6.56% 0.998 6.573% 1.0000 $0.6384
December, 2017 10.0566 6.06% 1.004 6.036% 1.0000 $0.6070
March, 2018 10.2701 6.22% 1.007 6.177% 1.0000 $0.6344
June 10.2518 6.22% 0.995 6.251% 1.0000 $0.6408
August, 2018 10.4276 6.29% 0.997 6.309% 1.0000 $0.6579
NAVPU is shown after quarterly distributions of dividend income and annual distribution of capital gains.
Portfolio YTW includes cash (or margin borrowing), with an assumed interest rate of 0.00%
The Leverage Divisor indicates the level of cash in the account: if the portfolio is 1% in cash, the Leverage Divisor will be 0.99
Securities YTW divides “Portfolio YTW” by the “Leverage Divisor” to show the average YTW on the securities held; this assumes that the cash is invested in (or raised from) all securities held, in proportion to their holdings.
The Capital Gains Multiplier adjusts for the effects of Capital Gains Dividends. On 2009-12-31, there was a capital gains distribution of $1.989262 which is assumed for this purpose to have been reinvested at the final price of $10.5662. Thus, a holder of one unit pre-distribution would have held 1.1883 units post-distribution; the CG Multiplier reflects this to make the time-series comparable. Note that Dividend Distributions are not assumed to be reinvested.
Sustainable Income is the resultant estimate of the fund’s dividend income per current unit, before fees and expenses. Note that a “current unit” includes reinvestment of prior capital gains; a unitholder would have had the calculated sustainable income with only, say, 0.9 units in the past which, with reinvestment of capital gains, would become 1.0 current units.
DeemedRetractibles are comprised of all Straight Perpetuals (both PerpetualDiscount and PerpetualPremium) issued by BMO, BNS, CM, ELF, GWO, HSB, IAG, MFC, NA, RY, SLF and TD, which are not exchangable into common at the option of the company (definition refined in May, 2011). These issues are analyzed as if their prospectuses included a requirement to redeem at par on or prior to 2022-1-31 (banks) or 2025-1-31 (insurers and insurance holding companies), in addition to the call schedule explicitly defined. See OSFI Does Not Grandfather Extant Tier 1 Capital, CM.PR.D, CM.PR.E, CM.PR.G: Seeking NVCC Status and the January, February, March and June, 2011, editions of PrefLetter for the rationale behind this analysis.

The same reasoning is also applied to FixedResets from these issuers, other than explicitly defined NVCC from banks.

Yields for September, 2011, to January, 2012, were calculated by imposing a cap of 10% on the yields of YLO issues held, in order to avoid their extremely high calculated yields distorting the calculation and to reflect the uncertainty in the marketplace that these yields will be realized. From February to September 2012, yields on these issues have been set to zero. All YLO issues held were sold in October 2012.

These calculations were performed assuming constant contemporary GOC-5 and 3-Month Bill rates, as follows:

Canada Yields Assumed in Calculations
Month-end GOC-5 3-Month Bill
September, 2015 0.78% 0.40%
December, 2015 0.71% 0.46%
March, 2016 0.70% 0.44%
June 0.57% 0.47%
September 0.58% 0.53%
December, 2016 1.16% 0.47%
March, 2017 1.08% 0.55%
June 1.35% 0.69%
September 1.79% 0.97%
December, 2017 1.83% 1.00%
March, 2018 2.06% 1.08%
June 1.95% 1.22%
August, 2018 2.22% 1.53%

Significant positions were held in NVCC non-compliant regulated FixedReset issues on July 31, 2018; all of these currently have their yields calculated with the presumption that they will be called by the issuers at par prior to 2022-1-31 (banks) or 2025-1-31 (insurers and insurance holding companies) or on a different date (SplitShares) This presents another complication in the calculation of sustainable yield, which also assumes that redemption proceeds will be reinvested at the same rate. It will also be noted that my analysis of likely insurance industry regulation as updated is not given much weight by the market.

I will also note that the sustainable yield calculated above is not directly comparable with any yield calculation currently reported by any other preferred share fund as far as I am aware. The Sustainable Yield depends on:
i) Calculating Yield-to-Worst for each instrument and using this yield for reporting purposes;
ii) Using the contemporary value of Five-Year Canadas to estimate dividends after reset for FixedResets. The assumption regarding the five-year Canada rate has become more important as the proportion of low-spread FixedResets in the portfolio has increased.
iii) Making the assumption that deeply discounted NVCC non-compliant issues from both banks and insurers, both Straight and FixedResets will be redeemed at par on their DeemedMaturity date as discussed above.

MAPF Portfolio Composition: August, 2018

Sunday, September 2nd, 2018

Turnover was light in August at 4%.

There is extreme segmentation in the marketplace, with OSFI’s NVCC rule changes in February 2011 having had the effect of splitting the formerly relatively homogeneous Straight Perpetual class of preferreds into three parts:

  • Unaffected Straight Perpetuals
  • DeemedRetractibles explicitly subject to the rules (banks)
  • DeemedRetractibles considered by me, but not (yet!) by the market, to be likely to be explicitly subject to the rules in the future (insurers and insurance holding companies)

This segmentation, and the extreme valuation differences between the segments, has cut down markedly on the opportunities for trading.

To make this more clear, it used to be that there were 70-odd Straight Perpetuals and I was more or less indifferent as to which ones I owned (subject, of course, to issuer concentration concerns and other risk management factors). Thus, if any one of these 70 were to go down in price by – say – $0.25, I would quite often have something in inventory that I’d be willing to swap for it. The segmentation means that I am no longer indifferent; in addition to checking the valuation of a potential buy to other Straights, I also have to check its peer group. This cuts down on the potential for trading.

And, of course, the same segmentation has the same effect on trading opportunities between FixedReset issues.

There is no real hope that this situation will be corrected in the near-term. OSFI has indicated that the long-promised “Draft Definition of Capital” for insurers will not be issued “for public consultation in late 2012 or early 2013”, as they fear that it might encourage speculation in the marketplace. It is not clear why OSFI is so afraid of informed speculation, since the constant speculation in the marketplace is currently less informed than it would be with a little bit of regulatory clarity. While the framework has been updated, the modifications focus on the amount of capital required, not the required characteristics of that capital. However, OSFI has recently indicated that it would support a mechanism similar to the NVCC rule for banks, so we may see some developments as the IAIS deliberations regarding insurance capital continue.

As a result of this delay, I have extended the Deemed Maturity date for insurers and insurance holding companies by three years (to 2025-1-31), in the expectation that when OSFI finally does provide clarity, they will allow the same degree of lead-in time for these companies as they did for banks. This had a major effect on the durations of preferred shares subject to the change but, fortunately, not much on their calculated yields as most of these issues were either trading near par when the change was made or were trading at sufficient premium that a par call was expected on economic grounds. However, with the declines in the market over the past nine months, the expected capital gain on redemption of the insurance-issued DeemedRetractibles has become an important component of the calculated yield.

Due to the footdragging by OSFI, I will be extending the DeemedMaturity date for insurance issues by another few years in the near future.

Sectoral distribution of the MAPF portfolio on August 31 was as follows:

MAPF Sectoral Analysis 2018-08-31
HIMI Indices Sector Weighting YTW ModDur
Ratchet 0% N/A N/A
FixFloat 0% N/A N/A
Floater 0% N/A N/A
OpRet 0% N/A N/A
SplitShare 10.0% 4.67% 5.01
Interest Rearing 0% N/A N/A
PerpetualPremium 0% N/A N/A
PerpetualDiscount 11.6% 5.56% 14.56
Fixed-Reset 60.2% 6.52% 9.52
Deemed-Retractible 8.5% 7.27% 5.46
FloatingReset 0% N/A N/A
Scraps (Various) 9.4% 6.83% 13.19
Cash +0.3 0.00% 0.00
Total 100% 6.29% 9.62
Totals and changes will not add precisely due to rounding. Cash is included in totals with duration and yield both equal to zero.
DeemedRetractibles are comprised of all Straight Perpetuals (both PerpetualDiscount and PerpetualPremium) issued by BMO, BNS, CM, ELF, GWO, HSB, IAG, MFC, NA, RY, SLF and TD, which are not exchangable into common at the option of the company. These issues are analyzed as if their prospectuses included a requirement to redeem at par on or prior to 2022-1-31 (banks) or 2025-1-3 (insurers and insurance holding companies), in addition to the call schedule explicitly defined. See OSFI Does Not Grandfather Extant Tier 1 Capital, CM.PR.D, CM.PR.E, CM.PR.G: NVCC Status Confirmed and the January, February, March and June, 2011, editions of PrefLetter for the rationale behind this analysis.

Note that the estimate for the time this will become effective for insurers and insurance holding companies was extended by three years in April 2013, due to the delays in OSFI’s providing clarity on the issue.

Calculations of resettable instruments are performed assuming a constant GOC-5 rate of 2.22% and a constant 3-Month Bill rate of 1.53%

The “total” reflects the un-leveraged total portfolio (i.e., cash is included in the portfolio calculations and is deemed to have a duration and yield of 0.00.). MAPF will often have relatively large cash balances, both credit and debit, to facilitate trading. Figures presented in the table have been rounded to the indicated precision.

Credit distribution is:

MAPF Credit Analysis 2018-08-31
DBRS Rating Weighting
Pfd-1 0
Pfd-1(low) 0
Pfd-2(high) 27.9%
Pfd-2 32.3%
Pfd-2(low) 30.1%
Pfd-3(high) 3.0%
Pfd-3 3.0%
Pfd-3(low) 2.8%
Pfd-4(high) 0%
Pfd-4 0%
Pfd-4(low) 0%
Pfd-5(high) 0.6%
Pfd-5 0.0%
Cash +0.5%
Totals will not add precisely due to rounding.
The fund holds a position in AZP.PR.C, which is rated P-5(high) by S&P and is unrated by DBRS; it is included in the Pfd-5(high) total.
A position held in INE.PR.A is not rated by DBRS, but has been included as “Pfd-3” in the above table on the basis of its S&P rating of P-3.

Liquidity Distribution is:

MAPF Liquidity Analysis 2018-08-31
Average Daily Trading Weighting
<$50,000 27.7%
$50,000 – $100,000 46.9%
$100,000 – $200,000 22.6%
$200,000 – $300,000 1.2%
>$300,000 1.4%
Cash +0.3%
Totals will not add precisely due to rounding.

MAPF is, of course, Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund, a “unit trust” managed by Hymas Investment Management Inc. Further information and links to performance, audited financials and subscription information are available the fund’s web page. The fund may be purchased either directly from Hymas Investment Management or through a brokerage account at Odlum Brown Limited. A “unit trust” is like a regular mutual fund, but is sold by offering memorandum rather than prospectus. This is cheaper, but means subscription is restricted to “accredited investors” (as defined by the Ontario Securities Commission). Fund past performances are not a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in MAPF or any other fund.

A similar portfolio composition analysis has been performed on the Claymore Preferred Share ETF (symbol CPD) (and other funds) as of July 31, 2017, and published in the August, 2017, PrefLetter. It is fair to say:

  • MAPF credit quality is much better
  • MAPF liquidity is lower
  • MAPF Yield is higher
  • Weightings
    • MAPF is roughly equally exposed to Straight Perpetuals
      • Much less exposed to PerpetualPremiums
    • Neither portfolio is exposed to Operating Retractibles (there aren’t too many of those any more!)
    • MAPF is more exposed to SplitShares
    • MAPF is less exposed to FixFloat / Floater / Ratchet
    • MAPF is a little higher weighted in FixedResets, but has a greater emphasis on lower-spread issues